DOCUMENT RESUME

ED 069 607 SP 005 934

TITLE Bibliographies in Education: Teacher Evaluation..INSTITUTION Canadian Teachers' Federation, Ottawa (Onitario).PUB DATE Jun 72NOTE 27p.; C-72104, Report 29

EDRS PRICE MF-$0.65 HC-$3.29DESCRIPTORS *Bibliographic Citations; Bibliographies; *Faculty

Evaluation; *Reference Books; *Teacher Evaluation

ABSTRACTThis bibliography, prepared by the Canadian Teachers'

Federation, presents documents covering a 5-year period concerningteacher evaluation. One hundred twenty-seven books, 193 articles, and29 theses are listed. An introductory statement indicates sourcesconsulted and where the document may be obtained. (MN)

Sr P 1 7972

BIBLIOGRAPHIES IN EDUCATION

No. 29

June 1972

U S. OEPARTMENT OF HEAI.1H,EOUCATION & WELFAREOFFICE OF EOUCAIION

nuS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED EXACTLY AS RECENED FROMTHE PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORMINA liNG IT POINTS OF VIEW OR OPINIONS STATED DO NOI NECESSARILYREPRESENT OFFICIAL OFFICE or EDUCATION POSITION OR POLICY

CANADIAN TEACHERS' FEDERATION(il)! I F i ()1', A A uNTARlo

TEACHER EVALUATION

Sources consulted in preparing this bibliography include theBibliographie du Quebec, British Education Index (The LibraryAssociation), the Canadian Education Index (CCRE), the CumulativeBook Index (Wilson's), the Current Index to Journals in Education(CCM), the Directory of Education Studies in Canada (CEA), theEducation Index (Wilson's), Education Studies Completed in Cana-dian Universities (CEA), Research in Education (ERIC), and ResearchStudies in Education (Phi Delta Kappa). The period covered is

approximately five years.

Abstracts of material with an ED number may be found inResearch in Education. If marked "Available ERIC", hard copy ormicrofiche copies may be purchased through the Education DocumentReproduction Service of the ERIC system.

Material available on loan from the CTF Library is markedwith a single asterisk. The Library is also purchasing microfichecopies of the ERIC documents available. A double asterisk appearsbeside these titles, indicating the material is available on loanin microform only.

CONTENTS

Books 3

Articles . 13

Theses ... 24

1. Alberta Teachers' Association. Self-Evaluation; a Guide for theElementary School. Interim edition. Edmonton, ATA, 1966.112 p.

*2. Association for Student Teaching. The Supervising Teacher;Recommended Standards for Selection and Function. CedarFalls: AST, 1966. 9 p.

**3. Astiu, Alexander W. Is "Higher" Education Really "Better" Educa-tion? Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education,1971. 19 p. Available ERIC. ED 051 735.

**4. Attitude Change of Freshman College Students Toward Their Role asRaters of Teacher Behavior. Final report. Henderson:Freed-Hardeman College, 1970. ,29 g. Available ERIC. ED

043 313.

*5. Misted, Charles A. and Edmund T. Emmer. Personality Correlates ofTeacher Performance in a Micro-Teaching Laboratory. Austin:University of Texas, 1970. 13 p.

**6. Baird, Hugh. Evaluating Teaching Episodes. Provo: Brigham YoungUniversity, 1966. 6 p. Available ERIC. ED 028 152.

**7. Bannister, John and others. Evaluating College teaching. 'San

Jose: San Jose State College, 1961. .8 p. Available ERIC.ED 022 450.

*8. .Barr, A. S. and others. Wisconsin Studies of the Measurement andPrediction of Teacher Effectiveness; a summary of investi-gations. Madison: Dembar Publications, Inc., 1961. 156 p.

*9. Beecher, Dwight E. The Teaching Evaluation Record. Buffalo:Syracuse University Press, 1953. 15 p.

**10. Bhaerman, Bob. A Paradigm for Accountability. QuEST Paper 12.Washington, D.C.: American Federation of Teachers, 1970.10 p. Available ERIC, ED 041 870.

*11. Biddle, Bruce J. and others. Contemporary Research on TeacherEffectiveness. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston,1964. 352 p.

12. Blai, Borris. Evaluation of Faculty Instruction. 1968. 8 p.from journal: Scientia Paedagogica Experimentalis v. 5,no. 2, 1968. ED 029 642. Not available ERIC.

**13. Bohlken, Robert and Kim Giffen. ASchool Teacher Effectiveness.Annual Meeting of the Speech1970. 11 p. Available ERIC.

Paradigm for Determining HighPaper presented at the

Communication Association,ED 050 118.

**14. Bolton, Dale L. Selection and Evaluation of Teachers: An Inter-pretive Study of Research and Development. Final report.Seattle: University of Washington, 1970. 268 p. AvailableERIC. ED 054 088.

**15. Bolvin,. John 0. Evaluating Teacher Functions. Pittsburgh:Pittsburgh University, 1967. 17 p. Available ERIC. ED020 573.

**16. Boyer, Marcia. Teacher Evaluation: Toward improving Instruction.Los Angeles: American Association of Junior Colleges,1970. 4 p. Available ERIC. ED 035 408.

**17. Boze, Nancy S. and Weldon E. ray. Screening Points in SecondaryTeacher Education Programs. Austin: Texas TechnologicalCollege, 1968. 17 p. Available ERIC. ED 031 454.

*18. Brinkmeier, Oria A. and others. Inside the Organization Teacher;the Relationship Between Selected Characteristics ofTeachers and Their Membership in Teacher Organizations.Danville, Illinois: Interstate Printers and Publishers,1967. 119 p.

19. Brickner, Ann and others. Summative Evaluation of Listen Look.

Learn Cycles R-40, 1967-68. Huntington, N.Y.: EducationalDevelopmental Labs, Inc.: 1968. 51 p. ED 027 166. Notavailable ERIC.

20.. Brighton, S. F. Increasing Your Accuracy in Teacher Evaluation.Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1965. 64. p..

**21. Burkhart, Robert C. The Assessment Revolution: New Viewpointsfor Teacher Evaluation. Albany: New York State EducationDepartment, 1969. 343 p. Available ERIC. ED 036 485.

**22. Case, Chester H. Beyond Evaluation: the Quality Control Model ofEvaluation and the Development Model for Faculty Growth andEvaluation. 1971. 16 p. Available ERIC. ED 047 669.

*23. Chabassol, David J. and others. Research Design in the Study of-Teacher, Competency. Papers presented to the Western RegionalConference on Education, Banff, 1958. var. paging.

**24. Christian, Floyd T. Developing a County Program for EvaluatingTeaching in Elementary and Secondary Schools. Tallahassee:Florida State Department of Education, 1967. 14 p.Available ERIC. ED 019 724.

4

**25. Clark, Kenneth E. Will Improved Skill in Teaching be Recognized?Washington, D.C.: American Educational Research Association,1970. 10 p. Available ERIC. ED 038 912.

**26. Coats, William D. Student Perceptions of Teachers -- A FactorAnalytic Study. Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University,1970. 15 p. Available ERIC. ED 041 302.

**27. Cohen, Arthur M.,and Florence B. Brawer. Measuring Faculty Per-formance. Washington, D.C.: American Association ofJunior Colleges, 1969. 90 p. Available ERIC. ED 031 222.

**28. Daniel, K. Fred. A Catalog of Analysis of Variance Pilot StudiesEmploying Data From the Official Florida Teacher EvaluationForm. Part II. Tallahassee: Florida Department of Educa-tion, 1967. 86 p. Available ERIC. ED 018 863.

**29. . The Measurement and Evaluation of Teaching,.A Con-ceptualization of a Plan for Use in State Educational Leader-ship. Tallahassee: Florida State Department of Education,1967. 133 p. Available ERIC. ED 018 862.

30. Delaney, Jack James. The Good Teacher: How Teachers Judge Teachers.New York: Philosophical Library, Inc., 1970. 114 p.

**31. DiPasquale, Vincent C. Teacher Selection as as Imperative forthe Improvement of Our Schools. 1970. 24 p. Available ERIC.ED 049 164.

*32. Duncan, John W. Governin Board - Superintendent Expectation andPerception on the Teacher Role. Burlingame CaliforniaTeachers Association, 1971. (Supp. Res. report #18).

**33. Eble, Kenneth E. The Reco nition and Evaluatin of Teachin .

Salt Lake City: Project to Improve College Teaching, 1970.117 p. Available ERIC. ED 046 350.

**34. Elms, Glen D. Closed Circuit Television Model Program. ArlingtonHeights: Elk Grove Training and Development Center, 1969.60 p. Available ERIC. ED 034 407.

**35. ERIC Abstracts: A Collection of ERIC Document Resumes on Evaluat-ing Teacher Effectiveness. ERIC Abstracts Series, NumberTwenty. Eugene: University of Oregon, 1971. 28 p.Available ERIC. ED 055 311.

**36. Fagan, Edward R. Evaluating Tomorrow's English Teachers. Burling-ame: California Association of Secondary School Administra-tors, 1964. 5 p. Available ERIC. ED 034 748.

5

1

**37. Faunce, R. W. Attitudes and Characteristics of Effective and NotEffective. Teachers of Culturally Disadvantaged Children.Minneapolis: Minneapolis Public Schools, 1969. 18 p.Available ERIC. ED 039 289.

**38. Fawcett, Claude W. The Skills of Teaching. Los Angeles:University of California, 1965. 121 p. Available ERIC.ED 016 605.

*39. Flanagan, John C. Principles and Procedures in Evaluating Per-formance. Pittsburgh: American Institute for Research,1952. 19 p.

*40. The Ford Foundation. The N.w Teacher. New York: Ford Foundation,1962. 39 p.

**41. Gage, N. L. and others. Equilibrium Theory and Behaviour Change:An Experiment in Feedback from Pupils to Teachers. Urbana:University of Illinois, 1960. 132 p. Available ERIC. ED049 177.

**42. . Explorations of the Teachers' Effectiveness in Ex-21211y1 E. Technical report no. 4, Stanford Center forResearch and Development in Teaching. Stanford: StanfordUniversity, 1968. 59 p. Available ERIC. ED 028 147.

**43. Gardner, James M. Training Proficiency Scale (Form A). Manual.Columbus: Ohio State Institute, 1969. 23 p. AvailableERIC. ED 044 011.

*44. Gerhard, Muriel. Effective Teaching Strategies with the BehavioralOutcomes Approach. West Nyack: Parkes Publishing Company,1971. 256 p.

**45. Gilbert, Harry B. Needed Research in the Area of Teacher Selec-tiOn. Brooklyn, N.Y.: New York City Board of Education,1967. 5 p. Available ERIC. ED 014467.

*46. Guthrie, E. R. The Evaluation of Teaching. Seattle: Universityof Washington, 1954. 19 p.

**47. Harsh, J. Richard. A Look at Teacher. Evaluation. Paper presentedat the Annual Conference of the American Association ofSchool Personnel Administrators, 1970. 20 p. AvailableERIC. ED 046 993.

**48. Hayes, Robert B. A Way to Evaluate and to Improve ClassroomTeaching Effectiveness. Harrisburg: Pennsylvania StateDepartment of Education, 1968. 10 p. Available ERIC. ED048 095.

**49. Heinz, Ed. Student Opinion Survey, Grossmont College. El Cajon:Grossmont College, 1967. Available ERIC. ED 017 233.

6

**50. Hildebrand, Milton and Robert C. Wilson. Effective UniversityTeaching and its Evaluation. Berkeley: University ofCalifornia, 1970. 41 p. Available ERIC. ED 039.860.

**51. Holmes, Monica Bychowski and others. Interaction Patterns as aSource of Error in Teachers' Evaluations of Head Start Chil-dren. Final report. New York: Associated YM-YWHAS ofGreater New York, 1968. 67 p. Available. ERIC. ED 023 453.

**52. Hook, J. N. and others. Illinois Self-Rating Scale for StudentEnglish Teachers (Beginning and Experienced). Urbana:Illinois State-Wide Curriculum.Study Center in the Prepara-tion of Secondary English Teachers, 1971. 27 p. AvailableERIC. ED 049 300.

**53. Howe, Nancy M. A Study of Wyoming Business Education Teachers'Knowledge and Understanding of Vocational Education. Finalreport. Cheyenne: Wyoming Research Coordinating Unit inVocational-Technical Education, 1969. 57 p. Available ERIC.ED 030 740.

**54. Howell, John J. Performance Evaluation in Relation to Teacher Edu-cation.and Teacher Certification. 1971. 27 p. Availab]eERIC. ED 055 974.

53. Huddy, James A. The Employment and Evaluation Cycle in Education.Washington, D.C.: Educational Service Bureau, 1968. 60 p.

ED 029 385. Not available ERIC.

*56. Huggett, Albert J., and T. M. Stinnett. Professional Problems ofTeachers. New York: Macmillan, 1956. 468 p.

*57. Hughes, Marie (Morrison) and others. Assessment of the Qualityof Teaching in Elementary Schools. A research report. SaltLake City: University of Utah, 1959. 314 p.

**58. Israel, Jack W. Innovation in Evaluation: Teacher Assessment byObjectives. 1969, 29 p. Available ERIC. ED 029 625.

**59. Jackson, Mary Lynn and Frances F. Fuller, Influence of.SocialClass on Students' Evaluations of Their Teachers. AppendixD. Austin: University of Texas, 1966. 5 p. AvailableERIC. ED 055 984.

**60. JrAnson, Charles E., and Jerold P. Bauch. Competency Based TeacherEvaluation Guide. GEM Bulletin 70-3. Athens: Universityof Georgia, 1970. 25 p. Available ERIC. ED 042 698,

**61. Kilpatrick, Gordon. Another Look at Teacher Evaluation in AmericanJunior Colleges, El Camino: El Camino College, 1967. 38 p.

Available ERIC. ED 020 720.

7

62. Krupka, John G. Report on'Faculty and Student Evaluation of Instruc-

tor Rating Questionnaite. Northampton, Pa.: Northampton

County Area. Community College, 1970. 11 p. ED 038 964.

Not available ERIC.

**63. Kurth, Edwin L., and Paul C. Gianini. Professional Competencies

of Teachers of Technical Education in Florida. Tallahassee:

Florida State Department of-Education, 1967. 76 p, Availabln

ERIC, ED 017 687.

**64. Lawson, Dene R. Indicators of Teacher Ability to Relate to Students.

Paper presented at AERA,annuaLmeeting, New York, 1970.

Stanford: Stanford University, 1971. Available ERIC. ED

050 008.

**65. Leigh, Terry. A Selected and Annotated Bibliography on Evaluating

Performance of College Faculty Members. Lexington: University

of Kentucky, 1969. 30 p. Available ERIC. ED 035 376.

**66. Lewis, Robert W. A Garland of Ratings, or, Just Try to Know

Thyself. Champaign: National Council of Teachers of English,

1964. 4 p. Journal Cit. -- College English v.25, no.5,

pp. 587-90, My'64. Available ERIC. ED 031 508.

**67. Masonis, Edward J. Problems and Procedures in Planning a Situation

Based Video Test on Teaching. Princeton, N.J.: Educational

Testing Service, 1971. 8 p. Available ERIC. ED 057 095.

68. McCahon, David and others. Instructional Consultant Checklist.

Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University, 1969. 2 p. ED 047 018.

Not available ERIC.

**69. McKenna, Bernard H. and others. Teacher Evaluation: An Annotated.

Bibliography. Washington, D.C.: ERIC Clearinghouse on

Teacher Education, 1971. 29 p. Available ERIC. ED 055 988.

**70. McNeil, John D. Performance Tests: Assessing Teachers of Reading.

San Diego: California Educational Research Association,1971. 10 p. Available ERIC. ED 054 200.

**71. Medley, Donald M., and Russell A. Hill. Cognitive Factors in

Teaching Style. Paper presented at the AERA meeting,

Minneapolis, 1970. 18 p. Available ERIC. ED 038 380.

*72. Metropolitan Toronto School Board. Quality Teaching Study.

Toronto: Metropolitan Toronto School Board, 1969. var.

paging.

**73. Mitzel, Harold E. Criterion Problems in Validating Teacher Selec-

tion Policies and Procedures. Brooklyn, N.Y.: New York

City Bow:d of Education, 1967. 5 p. Available ERIC. ED

014 466.

8

**74. Mood, Alexander M. Do Teachers Make a Difference? Paper presentedat a conference sponsored by the Office of Education,Washington, D.C., 1970. 28 p. Available ERIC. ED 040 253.

**75. Murdock, Royal P. The Effect of Student atings of Their Instruc-tor on the Student's Achievement and Rating. Final report.Available ERIC. ED 034 715.

**76. Musella, Donald. Perceptual-Cognitive Style as Related to Self-Evaluation and Supervisor Rating by Student Teachers. Ottawa:CORE, 1969. 11. p. Available ERIC. EU 031 450.

77. Musgrove, William R. Relationship of Occupational Experience,Teaching Experience, Technical Training and College Trainingto Rated Teaching Effectiveness of Vocational ElectronicsTeachers. Ann Arbor: University Microfilms, Inc., 1968.136 p. ED 025 625. Not available ERIC.

*78. National Education Association. Evaluation of Classroom Teachers.Washington, D.C.: NEA, 1964. 125 p.

*79. National Education Association. Educational Research Service.Evaluating Administrative/Supervisory Performance. ERSCircular No. 6, 1971. Washington: NEA, 1971. 60 p.

*80. . Evaluating Teaching Performance. Washington: NEA,1969. 62 p.

*81. . Evaluating Teaching Performance. ERS Circular No. 2,1972. Washington: NEA, 1972. 60 p.

**82. NEA Speaks Out on ... Teacher Evaluation. Trenton: New JerseyEducation Association, 1970. 5 p. Available ERIC. ED045 600.

**83. O'Connor, Edward F., and Thomas B. Justiz. Identifying the EffectiveInstructor. Los Angeles: University of California, 1970.34 p. Available ERIC. ED 035 416.

**84. Overing, R. L. R. Research Related to the Evaluation of Graduatesof Teacher Preparation Programs. Paper presented at annualmeeting AERA, Minneapolis, 1970. 19 p. Available ERIC. ED039 200.

85. Palmer, Orville. Seven Classic Ways of Grading Dishonesty.Champaign, Illinois: National Council of Teachers of English,1962. 4 p. ED 022 789. Not available ERIC.

**86. Panitz, Adolf and Thomas C. Olivo. National Occupational CompetencyTesting Project. A Consortium for Occupational CompetencyTesting of Trade and Industrial/Technical Teachers. Phase I:Planning-Organizing-Pilot Testing. Volume 3, Handbook forDeveloping and Administering Occupational Competency Tests.Taw Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers, The State University, 1971.171 p. Available ERIC. ED 057 217.

9

**87. . National Occupational Competency Testing Project. AConsortium for OcccrJational Competency Testing of Trade andIndustrial/Technical Teachers. Phase II: Directions for:Area Test Center Coordination Test Development, and TestAdministration. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers, The StateUniversity, 1971. 59 p. Available ERIC. ED 057 218.

**88. The State of the Art of Occupational CompcitencyTesting. National Occupational Competency Testing Project,Volume 2, Phase one. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers, TheState University, 1970. 88 p. Available ERIC. ED 051 378.

**89. Performance-Based Teacher Education: An Annotated Bibliography.Washington, D.C.: American Association of Colleges forTeacher Education, 1971. 37 p. Available ERIC. ED 050034.

90. Pi Lambda Theta. The Evaluation of Teaching. A report of the 2ndPi Lambda Theta Catena. Washington, D.C.: Pi Lambda Theta,1967. 260 p.

**91. Politzer, Robert L. Performance Criteria for the Foreign Language_Teacher. Technical report no. 1A. Stanford: StanfordUniversity, 1967. 62 p. Available ERIC. ED 034 733.

**92. Popham, W. James. Performance Tests of Instructor Competence forTrade and Technical Education. Final report. Los Angeles:University of California, 1968. 150 p. Available ERIC.ED 027 418.

**93. Popham, W. James and. Eva L. Baker. A Performance Test of TeachingEffectiveness. Paper presented at the American EducationalResearch Association Meeting, Chicago, 1969. Available ERIC.ED 015 144.

94. Randhava, Bikkar S. Similarity of Factor Solutions and Reliabili-ties of Instructor Effectiveness Rating Scale Items FromTwo Weighting Procedures. Saskatoon: University ofSaskatchewan, 1970. 9 p. (Staff study).

**95. Rayder, Nicholas F. College Student Ratings of Instructors. 13 p.Available ERIC, ED 021 527.

*96. Redfern, George B. How to Appraise Teaching Performance. Columbus,Ohio: School Management Institute Inc., 1963. 100 p.

**97. . Will Teacher Militancy Make Evaluation of TeacherPerformance Obsolete? Paper presented at the AnnualMeeting of the American Association of School Administrators,Atlantic City, N.J., 1969. 15 p. Available ERIC. ED 027 635.

10

*98. Report of Teacher Evaluation Study in the Sevier School District,4ehfieLLUtah May 1955 to September 1958. Salt LakeCity: Utah School Merit Study Committee, 1958. var. pagiaa.

99. Robichaud, Les Educateurs Montreal:BeauchenrIta. 1971. 80 P.

**100. Ronan;: W. W. Development of an Instrument to Evaluate CollegeClassroom.Teaching Effectiveness. Final report. Atlanta:Georgia. Institute of Technology, 1971. 169 p,: AvailableERIC. ED 056 647.

*101. Rondeau, Clement H. Pour une Education de' Qualite au Quebec.Montreal: Les Presses Libres, 1971. 70 p.

*102. Ryans, n.,id G. Characteristics of Teachers, Their Description,Comarison, and. Appraisal. Washington: American Council onEducation, 1960. 416 p.

**103. Teacher Evaluation Research, Part I: Consideration ofCritical Issues, Feasibility of. Collaborative Research, andOverall Design., Final report. Honolulu: University ofHawaii, 1971. 37 p. Available ERIC. ED 055 991.

*104. Sabine, Gordon A. How Students Rate Their Schools and Teach!2grs.Washington, D.C.: National Association of Secondary SchoolPrincipals, 1971. 76 p.

**105. Schafer, Michael I. Faculty Evaluation Working Papers: 1970-71Revision. Florida Community Junior College. Inter-institu-tional Research Council, 1971. 130 p. Available ERIC. ED047 663.

**106. Scott, Myrtle. Some Parameters of Teacher Effectiveneea 41). ,tasessedby an Ecological Approach. Nashville: George PeabodyCollege for Teachers, 1969. 27 p. Available ERIC. ED 032 928.

**107. Scriven, Michael. Social Science Education Consortium. Publication110, the Methodology of Evaluation. Lafayette: PurdueUniversity, 1966. 61 p. Available. ERIC. ED 014 001.

**108. Seager, G. Bradley. Evaluation of a Diagnostic Instrument of Super-vision. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the AmericanEducational Research Association, New York, 1971. 16 p.Available ERIC. ED 052 222.

**109. Selden, David. Evaluate Teachers? WEST papers Series #4. Wash-ington, D.C.: American Federation of Teachers, 1969. 6 p.Available ERIC. ED 032 271.

110. Shah, M. M. .,An Aptitude Test for Secondary School Teachers. India:University of Baroda, 1965. 340 p.

11

11

**111. Simpson, Ray H., and Jerome M. Seidman. Student Evaluation ofTeachingand Learning. Washington, D.C.: AmericanAssociation of Colleges for Teacher Education, 1962. 43 p.Available ERIC. ED 039 184.

*112. Smith, B. Othanel and others. A Study of the Logic of Teaching.Urbana: University of Illinois, 1962. 231 p.

*113. Standlee, Lloyd S., and W. James Popham. Professional andAcademic Preparation of Teachers Related to Two Indices ofTeaching Performance. Bloomington: University of Indiana,1958. 17 p.

114. Stemnock, Suzanne K. The Evaluatee Evaluates the Evaluator. ERSCircular No. 5. Washington, D.C.: Educational ResearchService, 1970. 54 p. ED 044 378. Not available ERIC.

115. . Evaluating Teaching Performance. Educational ResearchService Circular Number Three. Washington, D.C.: AmericanAssociation of School Administrators, 1969. 64 p. ED 033448. Not available ERIC.

**116. Student Evaluation of Teaching. Presentations at a Conference.Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh, 1970. 23 p.Available ERIC. ED 054 724.

117. Teacher Evaluation. Washington, D.C.: Educational Service Bureau,1967. 53 p. ED 030 204. Not available ERIC.

**118. Teacher Evaluation: Interface on Learning. Columbus: OhioEducation Association, 1970. 182 p. Available ERIC. ED057 008.

**119. Teacher Evaluation. PREP-21. Washington, D.C.: National Centerfor Educational Communication, 1971. 57 p. Available ERIC.ED 044 546.

**120. Tucker, Ellis E. Accountability in Education: A Bibliography.1971. 21 p. Available ERIC. ED 055 990.

*121. Veldman, Donald J. Pupil Evaluation of Student Teachers and TheirSupervisors. Austin: University of Texas, 1969. 5 p.(Rep. Series No. 17).

**122. . . Student Evaluation of Teaching. Austin: Universityof Texas, 1970. 17 p. Available ERIC. ED 055 979.

**123. Voege, Richard B. Procedures for Evaluating Classroom Teachersin Certain School Districts in the State of Washington.Seattle: School Information and Research Service, 1970.5 p. Available ERIC. ED 044 437.

12

*124. 'Walsh, John P. Teacher Competencies in Trade and IndustrialEducation. Washington, D.C.: U.S. -- Office of Education,1960. 64 p. (OE - 84006).

125. Werdell, Philip R. Course and Teacher Evaluation. Washington,

D.C.: National Student Education Association, 1967. 104 p.

ED 050 693. Not available ERIC.

126. Willingham, David Coye. A Study of the Relationship of SelectedStudent and Teacher Characteristics to the Effectiveness ofInstruction in the Biological Sciences as Perceived by JuniorCollege Students. Austin: University of Texas, 1970. 123 p.

ED 053 975. Not available ERIC.

**127. Wilson, David A. An Annotated Bibliography of Published WorksFrom R & D Center for Teacher Education. R & D Report

Series No. 22. Available ERIC. ED 033 096.

B. Articles

*1. Allen, Wendell C. and others. Performance criteria for educationalpersonnel development: a state approach to standards.J Teach Ed 20:133-5 Summer'69.

2. Anderson, J. M. Skeleton in the academic closet. Tex Outl 52:

28-9 D'68.

*3. Anker, W. What has happened to effective teaching? Clearing House

41:527-8 My'67.

4. Bates, A. W. A technique for recording and analysing lessons.J Ed Tech 1:160-72 0'70.

5. Beard, Richard L. The professor today: a jaundiced view.ImprovingCol & Univ Teach 19:93-5 Spring'71.

*6. Beduz, L. B. How do you deal with incompetence. BC Teach 50:

300-3 My-Je'71.

*7. Beller, E. Kuno. Teacher evaluation: why, what, and how. Peabody

J Ed 48:125-39 Ja'71.

*8. Berenson, D. H. Effects of systematic human relations trainingupon classroom performance of elementary school teachers.

J Res & Dev Ed 4:70-85 Winter'71.

*9. Bhaerman, Robert. Accountability: how can it really work for

the teacher? Sch Prog 40:27-9 F171.

10. Billett, R. E. Evaluation: the golden fleece. NY State Ed

55:42-3+Ja'68.

13

13

11. Blankenburg, R. M., and A. G. Thompson. Microteaching. Momentum2:35-7 F'71.

*12. Bledsoe, J. C. and others. Factors related to pupil observationreports of teachers and attitudes toward their teacher.J Ed Res 65:119-26 N'71.

13. Breyer, Norman L. and others. Behavioral consulting from adistance. Psych Sch 8:172-6 Ap'71.

14. Broudy, H. S. Continuing search for criteria. Am Assn Col TeachEd Yrbk 20:30-9 '67.

*15. Brown, A. F. How administrators view teachers. Can Ed Res D6:34-51 Mr'66.

16. Brown, B. B. Observer-judge ratings of teacher competence.Childh Ed 44:205-7 N'67.

*17. Brown, L. Good teacher. Tor Ed Q 7:26-7 Winter-Spring'68.

*18. Bryan, R. C. As students see their teachers. NEA J 57:20-1 Ap'68.

*19. . High school students view classroom control. ClearingHouse 42:345-7 F'68.

20. Buckley, D. W., and D. K. Hess. To see ourselves as others seeus. Ill Ed 55:174-5 D'66.

*21. Buski, J. S. Evaluation of teacher competence. CSA Bul 8:31-46D'68.

22. Buskin, Martin. Putting the screws to inservice training. InstrDev 2:1,4,6 F'71.

*23. Caldwell, Harrie E. Activity categories: a quantitative modelfor planning and evaluating science lessons. Sch Sci & Math71:55-63 Ja'71.

*24. Cameron, J. M. Teacher evaluation by students. OSSTF Bul 48:107-8 Mr'68.

25. Campbell, D. N. Report card for teachers. Pa Sch J 120:13-14S'71.

26. Cartmell, A. E. The use of CCTV in the assessment of teachereffectiveness. Programmed Learning 8:173-85 J1'71.

*27. Chabassol, D. J., and D. C. Thomas. Anxiety, aptitude, achievementand performance in male elementary teachers. Alberta J Ed Res14:233-7 D'68.

14

*28. Chambers, Margaret A., and Richard A. Graham. Competence: the

measure of tomorrow's teacher. Peabody J Ed 48:218-27

*29. Cheong, George S. C. Can successful teaching be empiricallydetermined. J Teach Ed 21:185-8 Summert70.

*30. Clement, S. L. Why is it? teachers shun evaluation. Clearing

House 42:465-7 Ap'68.

*31. Dalton, E. L. Pupil selection of teachers. Ed Lead 28:476-9FI71; reply L. DiFrancesco. Ed Lead 29:183 N'71.

32. Daly, Patrick L. Certification by performance. Changing Ed

4:23-4 Spring'70.

33. De Hart, Florence E. Teacher evaluation by students. J Ed Libr

10:33-8 Summert69.

34. Dial, D. E. Self-appraisal; new approach to teacher evaluation.Sch & Com 56;22-3 F'70.

35. Dickson, George E., and Dennis E. Hinkle. A study of thefeasibility of the Ohio teacher education model. J Res

& Dev Ed 3:56-67 Spring'70.

*36. Dillman, Terry. When college students grade the faculty. Todays

Ed 59:62+F'70.

*37. Drummond, William H. The meaning and application of performancecriteria in staff. Phi Delta Kappan 52:32-5 S'70.

*38. Dyer, Henry S. Can we measure the performance of educationalsystems? NASSP Bul 54:96-105 My'70.

*39. Egnatoff, J. G. New look at evaluating teacher performance. Ed

Can 11:19-21 D'71.

40. Elliot, John and John Hipkin. What makes man human? Times Ed

La 2919:4 Ap 30'71.

41. Ellis, Elmer C., and Lutian R. Wootton. Valid evaluation of teach-

ing is imperative. Kappa Delta Pi Rec 6:139-40 Ap'70.

*42. Engel, Ross A. Teacher evaluates teacher for pay differentials.Clearing House 45:407-9 Mr'71.

**43. Evaluation of teaching competence. NEA Res Bul 47:67-75 0'69.

*44. Farmer, D. E. Teacher behaviour and pupil development. Ont Ed

Res Council Newsl #9. 12 p.

15

45. Field, T. W. and others. Identifying patterns of teacher behaviorfrom student evaluations. J Applied Psych 55:466-9 0'71.

46. Figurski, Arthur J. Teaching excellence. J Ind Arts Ed 29:8-9S-0'69.

*47. Flanders, Ned A., and Anita Simon, pp. 1423-37 in Ebel, Robert(ed.) Encyclopedia of Educational Research, fourth edition.New York: Macmillan, 1969.

*48. Flower, G. E. Will-o'-the-wisp assessments of teaching performance.McGill J Ed 11:3-8 Spring'67.

49. Fox, A. M., and Dennis.D. Hein. Teacher perceptions in effectiveteaching. Colorado J Ed Res 10:45-9 Spring'71.

*50. Fox, W., and R. D. Jones. Plan for evaluation of teacher effi-ciency through cooperative goal-setting. Clearing House44:541-3 My'70.

51. Fritschel, A. L. Minimum standards for teacher competence. Ill Ed55:347-8 Ap'67.

*52. Fuller, F. F. and others. Tape recordings, feedback and prospec-tive teachers' self-evaluation. Alberta J Ed Res 12:301-7D'66.

53. Gates, Maxine and Collins W. Burnett. Students' perceptions ofprofessors. Improving Col & Univ Teach 17:234-6 Autumn'69.

54. Grady, Mary L. An assessment ofdisadvantaged children. J

55. Grant, L. M. Power Hof positive

Ap'68.

N:grIcerEsd'47=s4=171.

teaching. Sch & Com 54:13+

56. Gray, Charles E. The teaching model and evaluation of teachingperformance. J Higher Ed 40:636-42 N'69.

*57. Gulo, E. V. Rural students' attitudes toward their teachers.J Ed Res 62:88-93 0'68.

*58. Hain, J. H., and G. J. Smith. How principals rate teachers. AmSch Bd J 155:16-18 F'68.

*59. Hall, W., and R. L. R. Overing. Some impressions of quality teach-ing. McGill J Ed 11:9-13 Spring'67.

60. Hampton, Everett. Seven teaching sins as seen by seniors. ImprovingCol & Univ Teach 19:247-9 Summer'71.

61. Hanke, John E. and others. Researching the effective college teacher:a perceptual approach. J Student Pers Assn Teach Ed 9:51-4Winter'71.

16

. 16

*62. Harris, A. J. Effective teacher of reading. Read Teach 23:195-204+D'69.

Hedahl, B. M., and G. A. Sabine. How students rate their highschool teachers. Sch Guidance W 24:36-40 D'68.

64. Hein, Dennis. Effectiveness of teaching. Colorado J Ed Res 10:18-22 Winter'71.

65. Henry, George H. Style of teaching and teacher evaluation. Engl J59:921-7 0'70.

66. Hill, W. Ryland. Student rating of teachers. Engl Ed 60:107-80'69.

67. Hoops, M. Dean and J. R. Neil. Have you seen yourself teachlately? Excep Child 36:358-9 Ja'70.

*68. Hdenecke, D. Knowledge of curriculum works: its relation toteaching practice. J Teach Ed 21:478-83 Winter'70.

*69. Ingils, C. R. Let's do away with teacher evaluation. ClearingHouse 44:451-6 Ap'70.

**70. Jarrett, James L. The self-evaluating college teacher. Todays Ed58:40-1 Ja'69.

71. Johnson, D. J. Degrees for working teachers. Forum 11:65-6Spring'69.

*72. Johnson, James A., and Byron F. Radebaugh. Excellent teachers --what makes them outstanding? Clearing House 44:152-6 N'69.

73. Joselyn, E. Gary. Performance contracts, tests, and measurement.Changing Ed -:10-11 Ap'71.

*74. Justiz, T. B. Reliable measure of teacher effectiveness. Ed Lead27:49-55 0'69.

75. Kahn, Michael. The name of the game is teaching. Tech Ed News29:20-1 Ja-F'70.

76. Karmen, Thomas A. Faculty evaluation. Liberal Ed 15:539-44 D'69.

77. Kellough, R. D. Evaluation of teachers by students: let uscomprehend the nature of this demand. Sci Ed 55:439-40 0'71.

**78. Kerlinger, Fred N. Student evaluation of faculty professors.Sch & Soc 99:353-6 0'71.

79. Kirkton, Carole Masley. An ERIC guide to microteaching evaluation.Engl Ed 2:142-9 Spring'71.

17

. 17

80. Kleinman, G. S. Assessing teaching effectiveness: the state of

the art. Sci Ed 50:234-8 Ap'66,

81. Kramer, David W. Preparing for the renaissance of college teaching.

Bio Sci 21:1080-1 N'71.

*82. Ledford, Robert K. Teacher role perception as a function of

performance. IAR Res Bul 12:4-6 N'71,

63. Ledgerwood, C. D. Microteaching makes better teachers. Ed Media

1:14 S-0'69.

84. Leonard,Charles B. Computer-graded examinations: evaluation of a

teacher. Chem Ed 47:149-51 F'70.

*85. Levinthal, Charles F. and others. Student evaluations of teacher

behaviors as estimations of real-ideal discrepancies: a

critique of teacher rating methods. J Ed Psych 62:104-9

Ap'71.

*86. Lindemann, B. C. Teacher evaluation: barrier to communication?

Ed Lead 28:207-8 N'70.

87. Lindsey, Alfred J. An inexpensivesecondary teachers. Ill Sch

reliable plan to re-educate

Res 7:51-5 Spring'71.

*88. Locksley, N. Mathematical( ?)look atSci & Math 67:797-8 D'67.

evaluation of teaching. Sch

89. Lovett, Robert. Professional accountability in the schools. Kappa

Delta Pi Record 7:4-6 0'70.

*90. MacCurdy, Robert D. The judging of the one hundred great teachers.

Progress report No. 2. Ed 90:153-7 N-D'69.

*91. MacKay, D. A. Evaluation of teaching: a new look. Can Admin

10:15-19 Ja'71.

92. Maizels, Joan. How school-leavers rate teachers. New Society

16:535-7 S 24'70.

*93. Malone, C. F. Design for productive classroom evaluation. Clearing

House 42:348-54 F'68.

**94. Marshall, M. S. Reverse grading. Ed Lead 28:663-5 Mr'71.

95. May, C. R., and N. W. Earp. Professional performance level. Tex

Outl 51:35-6 Mr'67.

*96. McDaniel, Ernest and John F. Feldhusen. College teaching effective-

ness. The results of a survey of 4,484 college students.

Todays Ed 60:27 Mr' 71.

18

18

*132. . Practical ways of improving curriculum via measurable

objectives. NASSP Bu]. 55:76-90 My'71.

*133. . Teaching skill under scrutiny. Phi Delta Kappan

52:599-602 Je'71.

134. Powell, J. P. Teaching and interacting. Contemp Ed 41:137-8

Ja'70.

135. Psencik, Leroy F. Analyzing the classroom behavior of social

studies teachers. Southwestern J Soc Ed 1:23-34 Fall'70.

136. Quarles, N. K. Evaluation: teacher rating by pupils. Ag Ed Mag

38:270-1 Je'66.

*137. Quirk, Thomas J. and others. Development of the program forlearning in accordance with needs teacher observation scale:a teacher observation scale for indi1idualized instruction.

J Ed Psych 62:188-200 Je'71.

*138. Radebaugh, B. F., and J. A. Johnson. Excellent teachers: what

makes them outstanding? Clearing House 45:410-18 Mr'71.

*139. Randhawa, B. S., and H. W. Savage. Student criteria for evaluating

college instructor's effectiveness. Man J Ed 6:35-44 N'70.

*140. Ratsoy, Eugene W. Accounting for differences in teacher effective-

ness criteria. Can Admin 10:05.)-9 My'71.

*141. Resnik, H. S. Are there better ways to teach teachers? Sat R

55:46-50 Mr 4'72.

142. Ringkamp, H. Escalation in evaluation. Cath Sch J 66:128+S'66.

*143. Robertson, J. R., and J. D. Haas. Teacher personality and the new

social studies. J Ed Res 64:133-8 N'70.

144. Ross, I.,and R. Daniells. Two faculty of arts committees take a

hard look at teaching. UBC Reports 16:2-3 F 5'70.

145. Rouleau, J. N. Les revoltes etudiantes remettent en question le

role de l'enseignant. Ed Qua 1:22-3 jn'68.

146. Ryder, Sarah. Evaluating the teacher. Improving Col teliniv Teach

18:272-4 Ag'70.

*147. Saadeh, I. Q. Teacher effectiveness or classroom efficiency: a

new direction in the evaluation of teaching. J Teach Ed

21:73-91 Spring'70.

148. Sanders, R. Stimulus variation in the classroom. Sch & Com

58:36-7 F'72.

21

. 21

*149. Schmidt, Linda and June Gallessich. Adjustment of Anglo-Americanand Mexican-American pupils in self-contained and team-teaching classrooms. J Ed Psych 62:328-32 Ag'71.

150. Selden, William. Evaluation, the key to progress. Balance Sheet52:12-13 S'70.

151. Sharpe, D. J. Supervision in the urban classroom. Cath Ed R67:145-54 N'69.

*152. Silbermen, M. L. Behavioral expression of teachers' attitudestoward elementary school students. J Ed Psych 60:402-70'69.

153. Slagle, A. T. How teachers get that way. Wis J Ed 99:10-11Mr'67.

154. Smythe, Jack. Emerging approaches to the evaluation of personnel:supervisor's role in teacher self-evaluation. Nat Bsns Ed AssnYrbk No. 7:203-7.

155. Soar, R. S. New developments in effective teaching. Am BiolTeach 30:43-7 Ja'68.

*156. Stanton, H. E. The diagnostic rating of teacher performance scale.Australian J Ed 15:95-103 Mr'71.

*157. Start, K. B. Intent and inference in references. Ed R 20:218-23Je'68.

*158. . Rater-ratee personality in the assessment of teachingability. Brit J Ed Psych 38:14-20 F'68.

*159.. Relation of teaching ability to measures of personality.

Brit J Ed Psych 36:158-65 Ja'66.

*160. Stradley, W. E. Getting to the top of the staff totem pole.Clearing House 45:538-40 My'71; reply P. J. Viel 46:200-2

*161. Streeter, C. E. Teacher competency and classroom use of educationalmedia. AV Instr 14:60-2 Ja'69.

*162. Strom, R. D., and C. Galloway. Becoming a better teacher. J TeachEd 18:285-92 Fall'67.

163. Taft, Martin I. A systematic method for evaluating teachers.J Engl Ed 59:852-7 Mr'69.

*164. Teacher education. ATA Mag 50:28-31 Ap'70 (Special issue: Teachingand learning/1999).

22

. 22

165. Teacher evaluators: California school plans rating checklist.Nations Sch 84:50 S'69.

166. Teacher evaluators; Cubberley High School rating checklist.Nations Sch 84:50 S'69.

*167. Teachers' favorable image; Gallup survey of the public's attitudestoward the public schools, 1971. Sch & Soc 100:76-8 F'72.

*168. Teaching. ATA Mag 50:18-22 Ap'70 (Special issue: Teaching andlearning/1999).

169. Thomson, J. A note on the evaluation of teaching performance.J Ed Admin 9:74-8 My'71.

*170. Trivett, J.V. Accountability. BC Teach 50:18-21 S-0'70.

*171. Tuckman, B. W., and W. F. Oliver. Effectiveness of feedback to. teachers as a function of source. J Ed Psych 59:297-301

Ag'68.

172. Vaidya, N. Microteaching. Teaching 43:57-63 D'70.

*173. Van Winkle, H. Score card for rating teacher performance.Clearing House 42:287 Ja'68.

174. Vittetoe, J. O. Evaluating teachers. Sch & Com 57:7-8 F'71.

*175. Wagoner, D, E. Do you know anything at all about how well or howmuch your teachers teach? Am Sch Bd J 158:21-2 Ag'70.

176. Wagoner, R. L., and J. P. O'Hanlon. Teacher attitude towardevaluation. J Teach Ed 19:471-5 Winter'68.

177. Waimon, Morton D. Judging the effectiveness of teaching. J

Curric Studies 1:269-77 N'69.

*178 Waimon, Morton D., and Gary C. Ramseyer. Effects of video feedbackon the ability to evaluate teaching. J Teach Ed 21:92-5Spring'70.

*179. Washington, Eva. The expert teacher action study: a new approachto teacher evaluation. J Teach Ed 21:258-63 Summer'70.

180. Weathersby, Rita. Minicourses for teachers. Instr Dev 2:3 F'71.

181. Wiegand, D. B. Teachers write the evaluation criteria at Ladde.Sch & Com 57:24 Ja'71.

*182. Weigel, Richard G. and others. Differences in course grades andstudent ratings of teacher performance. Sch & Soc 99:60-2Ja'71.

23

183. Weisse, E. B. Teacher competition: agent for educational change.Ed Forum 34:247-50 Ja'70.

*184. Wilshaw, D. R. Let's take another look at teacher evaluation.NY State Ed 56:20-1 F'69.

185. Wilson, C. H. Educational innovation: are public schools goingoverboard? Nations Sch 80:65-8 N'67.

186. Wood, Robert W., and Roger Wess. A program in microteaching forprospective elementary teachers. Supery Q 6:24-8 F'70.

*187. Workshop; evaluating staff performance. Sch Mgt 11:15 Je'67.

**188. Workshop; evaluating teacher effectiveness provides students withmagic slates. Sch Mgt 11:9 D'67.

189. 7targer, Sam J. Behavioral objectives: where and where not. KappaDelta Pi Record 7:99-102 Ap'71.

*190. Young, J. Confusion is certification by performance. NY State Ed57:20-3 F'70.

*191. Zax, Manuel. Outstanding teachers: who are they? Clearing House45:285-9 Ja'71.

*192. Zollitsch, Herbert G., and Richard A. Kaimann. Should studentsevaluate faculties. Ed Media 2:10-12 My'70.

193. Zverev, I. D. Changeover of grades 1-3 to the new curricula andscientific-pedagogical measures for assisting the school.Soviet Ed 13:3-4, 37-60 Ja-F'71.

C. These:

1. Amsterdam, Anne R. A Comparison of the Effectiveness of ThreeSelected Groups of Married Women Elementary Teachers.Ph.D. thesis, University of New York, 1967. DA 889-A.

2. Bane, Robert King. Relationships Between Measures of ExperimentalCognitive, and Affective Teaching Behavior and SelectedTeacher Characteristics. Ph.D. thesis, University ofFlorida, 1969.

3. Barck, Philip Harry. Teacher Attitudes Toward Self-Appraisal.Ph.D. thesis, University of Arizona, 1969. DA1765-A.

4. Bishop, William E. Characteristics of Teachers Judged Success-ful by Intellectually Gifted, High Achieving High SchoolStudents. Ph.D. thesis, Kent State University, 1966.

24

24

5. Bridgman, John Northan. Selected Teacher Characteristics and TheirRelationships with Certain Behavior Patterns and TeachingEffectiveness. Ph.D. thesis, University of North Carolina,1967. DA 3524-A.

6. Burron, Arnold Herbert. The Relationship of Selected Pre-ServiceBiographical Factors and Administrator-Evaluated Competencyor Incompetence in Teaching. P.D. thesis, Ball StateUniversity, 1969.

7. Chauvette, Jean-Louis. Les Criteres Generaux de 1'Evaluation del'Efficacite des Enseignants dans Quatre CommissionsScolaires Locales. M.Ed. thesis, Universite de Montreal,1969. 175 p.

8. Cooney, Thomas James. An Analysis of Teachers' Vetl'al BehaviorUsing the Theory of Relations. Ph.D. thesis, Universityof Illinois, 1969.

9. Echternacht, Gary James. Evaluation of Innovations to ImproveTeacher Competencies. Ph.D. thesis, Iowa State University,1969.

10. Eissey, Edward Michael. Selected Variables in Teacher Preparationand Subsequent Evaluation of Teaching Performance. Ph.D.

thesis, Florida State University, 1967. DA 2115-A.

11. Gianini, Paul Charles. Professional Competencies of Teachers of

Technical Education in the State of Florida. Ph.D.

thesis, University of Florida, 1968.

12. Hasson, Allen. A Comparison of Student Evaluation of Teaching,and Teacher Self-Evaluation. Ph.D. thesis, Arizona StateUniversity, 1966.

13. Justiz, Thomas Benson. A Method for Identifying the EffectiveTeacher. Ph.D. thesis, University of California (LosAngeles) 1968. DA 3022-A.

14. Margules, Morton. Comparison of Supervisors' Ratings of MostEffective and Least Effective Industrial Arts Teachers onThree Competency Dimensions. Ph.D. thesis, University of

Ottawa, 1968. 79 p.

15. McCullough, James Lewis. A Study of Teacher Attitude and Teacher.Rating. Ph.D. thesis, University of Nebraska, 1968.DA 444-A.

16. Morrison, B. M. The Reactions of Internal and External Childrento Patterns of Teaching Behaviour. Ph.D. thesis, Universityof Michigan, 1966. 149 p.

25

17. Nichols, M. Gene. A Study of the Influences of Selected VariablesInvolved in Student Evaluations of Teacher Effectiveness.Ph.D. thesis, University of South Dakota, 1967. DA 2908-A.

18. Olson, Miles Curtis. A Study of Relationships Between StudentRating of Teacher Voice and Classroom Interaction. Ph.D.thesis, University of Nebvaska, 1968. DA 4355-A.

19. Potter, Neil R. The Relationships of Selected Student Characteristicsto Teacher Ratings. Ph.D. thesis, Colorado State University.DA 1404-A.

20. Robitaille, David F. Selected Behaviours and Attributes of EffectiveMathematics Teachers. Ph.D. thesis, Ohio State University,and the Montreal Catholic School Commission, 1969. 190 p.

21. Rogers, Kenneth Gordon. An Empirical Study of the Criteria ofTeacher Evaluation Employed by High School Principals inAlberta. M.Ed. thesis, University of Alberta, 1970.

22. Sangster, Cecil Henry. Patterns of Teaching Effectiveness AmongFifth Grade Teachers. Ph.D. thesis, University of Minnesota,1967. DA 4960-A.

23. School System Personnel: Administrative Practices and Problems.Edmonton: University of Alberta, 1971. 78 p.'

24. Seville, Saturnino. Study of the Actual and Ideal Guidance Roleof Elementary School Teachers. Ph.D. thesis, Universityof Ottawa, 1970.

25. Strohmeyer, Eric Richard. Predicting Teacher Effectiveness fromTeacher and Student Values. Ph.D. thesis, Colorado StateUniversity, 1969. DA 4288-A.

26. Stutzman, Carl Raymond. An Examination of the Relationships BetweenTeacher Effectiveness and Patterns of Professional Prepara-tion. Ph.D. thesis, Pacific University, 1968. DA 1469-A.

27. Thomas, E. Barrington. An Examination of the Criteria of TeacherEvaluation Employed by High School Principals in Victoria,Australia. M.Ed. thesis, University of Alberta, 1969. 156 p.

28. Torreson, Don T. A Comparative Study of Evaluation Proceduresfor Non-Tenure Teachers in Selected Urban School Systems.Ph.D. thesis, University of Indiana, 1967.

29. Williamson, John Anderson. Personality Characteristics ofEffective Texas Teachers. Ph.D. thesis, University ofArkansas, 1967. DA 67-A.

26

BIBLIOGRAPHIES IN EDUCATION SERIES

No. 1 June 1969

No, 2 June 1969No. 3 Oct. 1969No. 4 Nov. 1969

No. 5

No. 6

No. 7

No. 8No. 9

No.10No.11No.12No.13No.lANo.15

No, 16

No.17No.18

Dec. 1969Jan. 1970Feb. 1970March 1970April 1970June 1970Aug. 1970Oct. 1970Nov. 1970Nov. 1970Dec. 1970Dec. 1970Jan. 1971Feb. 1971

No.19 March 1971No.20 April 1971.No.21 May 1971No,22 June 1.971No.23 Oct. 1971No.24 Dec. 1971No.25 Dec. 1971No.26 Jan. 1972No.27 March 1972No.28 May 1972No.29 June 1972

Pre-Service Teacher Education in Canada (0/p)(Addenda, October 1971) ED 034 726School Dropouts (o/p) (Add!nda, February 1971)Flexible Scheduling in Secondary Schools (o/p)Computer Uses in Instructional ProgramsED 034 728Microteaching (o/p) ED 036 480Reporting to ParentsTeacher Aides (included in No, 16) ED 037 406Sex EducationDisadvantaged Children in Canada ED 041 965School. Year Plans (Addenda, January 1972)Education Finance in CanadaIndependent Study (o/p) ED 045 585Individualized Instruction (o/p) ED 046 881Histories of Teachers' Associations in Canada (o/p)Differentiated Staffing (o/p) ED 045 608Paraprofessional School Personnel ED 048 102Open Area Schools (Addenda, December 1971)Parent Involvement in School Programs (o/p)ED 054 270Behavioral. Objectives in Education ED 051 127Teacher Workload (o/p) ED 054 060Merit Rating ED 057 433Team Teaching ED 055 044Collective Bargaining for TeachersTraining Teachers for Inner City Schools ED 058 172Systems Analysis in Education ED 058 171Community CollegesSchool DisciplineEarly Childhood Education'Teacher Evaluation