economic impacts of cultural diversity in the netherlands: productivity, utility, and sorting
DESCRIPTION
Economic Impacts of Cultural Diversity in the Netherlands: Productivity, Utility, and Sorting. Hamilton, April 2012 Jessie Bakens , Peter Mulder , Peter Nijkamp VU University Amsterdam Department of Spatial Economics. Average results. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Economic Impacts of Cultural Diversity in the Netherlands:
Productivity, Utility, and SortingHamilton, April 2012
Jessie Bakens, Peter Mulder, Peter NijkampVU University AmsterdamDepartment of Spatial Economics
Average resultsVariables ln(wage) ln(housing price)
I (all cities)
II (largest )
I(all cities)
II(largest )
Diversity index 0.01 (0.31) 0.89**(0.33)
3.07***(0.37) 2.96***(0.83)
Share of high-educated 5.15***(0.39)
4.92***(0.57)
ln(no jobs in 45 minutes)
1.25***(0.16)
0.54**(0.23)
ln(income per resident) 1.09***(0.06) 0.89***(0.16)
No of observations 176 25 176 25
R2 0.46 0.76 0.61 0.78***significant at 1%, ** at 5%, * at 10%. Heteroskedasticity‐robust standard error in parentheses.Source: own calculations based on CBS(GBA, SSB), NVM, ABF‐Real Estate monitor.
But……….
• Assumption of homogeneous agents
• No role for sorting: spatial selection based on heterogeneous characteristics of residents
• Parallel labour and housing markets
• No role for local amenities
Data• Dutch micro panel-data
• Transaction costs houses (1999-2008)
• Owner/worker characteristics
• Firm characteristics
• Amenities (cultural and other)
• 126,959 observations (of 61,738 individuals)
Research Question•What is the effect of cultural diversity on
productivity and utility of Dutch residents?
Identification strategy step IFramework inspired by Combes et al. (2008)*
• Wage equation (1):
• Housing price equation (2):
*Combes, P., G. Duranton and L. Gobillon (2008). Spatial Wage Disparities: Sorting Matters!, Journal of Urban Economics, no. 63, pp. 723-742.
Variance decomposition (1): resultsEffect labour market
St. Dev. Correlation with ln(wage)
Residuals 0.15 0.37
Individual effects 0.37 0.89
Age effect 0.36 0.34
Sector effect 0.04 0.11
Sector-age effect 0.01 -0.01
Area-year effect 0.04 -0.07
Variance decomposition (2): resultsEffect housing market
St. Dev. Correlation with ln(housing price)
Residuals 0.13 0.43
Individual effects 0.25 0.82
Age effect 0.35 0.19
Maintenance inside outside
0.020.01
0.080.1
Pre-1930 construction 0.01 0.16
House type 0.05 0.28
Area-year effect 0.16 0.50
Identification strategy step II• Labour market area-effect (wage residuals) (3):
• Housing market area-effect (housing price residuals) (4):
Results step IIVariables Area-year effect
labour marketArea-year effect housing market
Area-year effect labour market
-0.25*** (0.07)
Area-year effect housing market
-0.06*** (0.02)
Diversity index 0.03 (0.03) -0.31*** (0.04)
Share of high-educated 0.03 (0.05) 0.79*** (0.07)
ln(no jobs in 45 minutes) 0.16*** (0.01)
ln(population ) -0.01*** (0.004)
Historic centre 0.01 (0.01) 0.07*** (0.02)
Year dummies Yes Yes
No of observations 689 689
R2 0.33 0.67***significant at 1%, ** at 5%, * at 10%. Heteroskedasticity‐robust standard error in parentheses.Source: own calculations based on CBS(GBA, SSB), NVM, ABF‐Real Estate monitor.
Results step II cont’d Variables Area-year effect housing market
Model I Model II Model III Model IVlabour market -0.25***
(0.07)-0.21*** (0.07) -0.23***
(0.07)-0.20*** (0.07)
Diversity index -0.31*** (0.04) 1.05*** (0.32) -0.38** (0.05) -0.09 (0.06)
QoL index 0.13*** (0.02) 0.07*** (0.01)
Interaction term -0.21*** (0.06)
Restaurant ind’tor
0.08*** (0.02) 0.10*** (0.02)
Share of high-educated
0.79*** (0.07) 0.67*** (0.07) 0.71*** (0.07) 0.51*** (0.07)
ln(no jobs in 45 minutes)
0.16*** (0.01) 0.15*** (0.01) 0.17*** (0.01) 0.16*** (0.01)
Historic centre 0.07*** (0.02) 0.05*** (0.01) 0.05*** (0.01) 0.03** (0.02)
Year dummies Yes Yes Yes Yes
No of observations
689 689 689 689
R2 0.67 0.70 0.68 0.71***significant at 1%, ** at 5%, * at 10%. Heteroskedasticity‐robust standard error in parentheses.Source: own calculations based on CBS(GBA, SSB), NVM, ABF‐Real Estate monitor.
Conclusions• Cultural diversity impacts productivity and utility
mainly through sorting. How does this black-box work: Creative class likes multi-culti environment?
• In the housing market, area characteristics also matter
▫Negative effect of cultural diversity on rent residuals
▫Socio-economic effects outweigh migrant induced amenities
Future research
Acknowledgement• Financial support from NORFACE research programme
(MIDI-REDIE project) on Migration in Europe - Social, Economic, Cultural and Policy Dynamics, is acknowledged.
• The data on housing prices used in this research is provided by the Dutch association of real estate agencies: de Nederlandse Vereniging van Makelaars o.g. en vastgoeddeskundigen NVM.
• CBS (Statistics Netherlands) provided data on Dutch residents and firms.
• Ministry of Internal Affairs provided data from the Quality of Living index (Leefbaarometer).
Thank you for your attention!