economic consequences of brexit oecd april 2016

35
THE ECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES OF BREXIT: A TAXING DECISION 27 April 2016 http:// www.oecd.org/economy/the-economic-consequences-of-brexit-a-taxing-de cision.htm @OECD @OECDeconomy

Upload: oecd-economics-department

Post on 16-Apr-2017

81.205 views

Category:

Economy & Finance


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Economic consequences of brexit OECD April 2016

THE ECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES OF BREXIT:

A TAXING DECISION

27 April 2016

http://www.oecd.org/economy/the-economic-consequences-of-brexit-a-taxing-decision.htm

@OECD@OECDeconomy

Page 2: Economic consequences of brexit OECD April 2016

2

Key results

Page 3: Economic consequences of brexit OECD April 2016

3

Impact of Brexit in the United Kingdom through channels and over time

Source: OECD calculations.

Difference in real GDP relative to the UK staying in the EU

GDP(%)

GBP cost equivalent

per household

Riskpremia

Confidence Trade FDI Skills Immigration Deregulation

Near term: 2020 -3.3% -2200 x x x x

Central -5.1% -3200 x x x x x

Optimistic -2.7% -1500 x x x x x

Pessimistic -7.7% -5000 x x x x

Longer term: 2030

Scenarios

Outcomes Channels

Page 4: Economic consequences of brexit OECD April 2016

4

The context

Page 5: Economic consequences of brexit OECD April 2016

5

Since EU membership in 1973, UK living standards have risen more than in peers

1. In constant purchasing power parities.

Source: OECD (2016), OECD National Accounts Statistics (database), April.

Real GDP1 per capita, percentage change between 1973 and 2014

Page 6: Economic consequences of brexit OECD April 2016

6

1. Data for GDP adjusted for purchasing power parity (PPP) refer to 2014. Data for population refer to 2013. Population figures for Canada and the European Union refers to 2012. Data for trade (i.e. sum of exports and imports of goods and services) refer to 2014. Trade data for the United Kingdom and the European Union exclude intra-EU trade. Data for territory refer to 2015.

Source: IMF (2015), World Economic Outlook Database, October 2015, International Monetary Fund; OECD (2016), OECD Population Statistics (database), April; and World Bank (2016), World Development Indicators (database), April.

Percentage share of world total1

Global economic power of the United Kingdom is greater through the European Union

Page 7: Economic consequences of brexit OECD April 2016

7

Uncertainty has started to affect the economy

Page 8: Economic consequences of brexit OECD April 2016

8

People’s voting intentions are neck and neck

Source: Polling agencies and ECO calculations.

Weighted average of available opinion polls, percentage

Page 9: Economic consequences of brexit OECD April 2016

9

Economic policy uncertainty is increasing1

1. The newspaper-based Economic Policy Uncertainty Index for the United Kingdom is constructed based on articles drawn from two newspapers: The Times of London and Financial Times. The number of newspaper articles containing the terms uncertain or uncertainty, economic or economy, and one or more policy-relevant terms are counted and then scaled by a measure of the number of articles in the same newspaper and month. Newspaper-level monthly series are standardised to unit standard deviation prior to 2011. The country-level index is calculated as an unweighted average of the standardised newspaper-level monthly series, which is then normalised to a mean of 100 prior to 2011.

Source: NIESR (2016), “April 2016 GDP estimates”, Press Release, National Institute of Economic and Social Research; and www.policyuncertainty.com.

Page 10: Economic consequences of brexit OECD April 2016

10

Brexit risk has begun to affect financial markets in the United Kingdom and the euro area

1. Five-year senior debt, mid-rate credit default swap (CDS) spreads for sovereign bonds.

Source: Datastream.

Page 11: Economic consequences of brexit OECD April 2016

11

Uncertainty about Brexit has led to capital outflows and a weaker exchange rate

Source: Datastream.

Page 12: Economic consequences of brexit OECD April 2016

12

Brexit generates an important interest in the United Kingdom and beyond

Adjusted for population size.

Source: Google Trends.

Page 13: Economic consequences of brexit OECD April 2016

13

Near-term consequences of Brexit

Page 14: Economic consequences of brexit OECD April 2016

14

1. All data are three month moving averages, ending in the current month. The corporate bond spread is the spread between 10-year BBB corporate bonds and the 10-year government bond rate. Policy uncertainty is measured by the Economic policy Uncertainty Index.

Source: OECD calculations based on Datastream and www.policyuncertainty.com/.

Corporate bond spreads are correlated with policy uncertainty and equity volatility

Page 15: Economic consequences of brexit OECD April 2016

15

Financing of the large current account deficit of the United Kingdom requires substantial inflows

As a percentage of GDP1

1. Figures refer to half-yearly data that is calculated as an average of two quarters.2. Other investment includes portfolio investment, financial derivatives, trade credit, loans, currency and deposits and other assets and liabilities as well as reserve assets.

Source: OECD (2016), OECD Economic Outlook: Statistics and Projections (database), April and ONS (2016), "Balance of Payments: Oct to Dec and annual 2015", Office for National Statistics, March.

Page 16: Economic consequences of brexit OECD April 2016

16

1. European Union excluding the United Kingdom.2. The balance on primary income shows net primary income flows between resident and non-resident institutional units. Primary income captures returns for the provision of labour and financial assets and renting of natural resources. The balance on secondary income captures further redistribution of income through current transfers, such as by governments or charitable organisations. Whereas primary income affects national income, secondary income, together with primary income, affects gross national disposable income.Source: ONS (2016), "Balance of Payments: Oct to Dec and annual 2015", Office for National Statistics, March; and Eurostat (2016), Annual National Accounts (database), April.

The United Kingdom and the European Union are important trade partners

Page 17: Economic consequences of brexit OECD April 2016

17

UK exports of financial services are large

Exports of financial services, as a percentage of GDP1

EBOPS: extended balance of payments services (classification).

Source: OECD (2016), "Trade in services by partner country", in OECD International Trade and Balance of Payments (database), April.

Page 18: Economic consequences of brexit OECD April 2016

18

Possible post-Brexit arrangements with the European Union

Source: OECD compilation.

Arrangement Example Characteristics

- contributions to the EU budget- free movement of goods, capital, services and people- outside the EU Customs Union- very limited influence on regulation

- contributions to the EU budget- requires trade agreements with individual EU countries and across industry sectors- no passporting rights for banks- outside the EU Customs Union- very limited influence on regulation

- tariff-free access to most of the EU Single Market, except for financial services- adoption of EU external tariffs for non-EU trade- very limited influence on regulation

- mostly tariff-free Single Market access, but compliance needed with EU standards and product regulations- no full access for services and no automatic passporting rights for banks

World Trade Organization - Most-Favoured Nation - trade with the EU subject to the EU’s common external tariff

Free Trade Agreement

European Economic Area (EEA)Iceland,

Norway and Liechtenstein

European Free Trade Association (EFTA) Switzerland

Customs union Turkey

Page 19: Economic consequences of brexit OECD April 2016

19

Length of Free Trade Agreement negotiations, examples

Source: OECD compilation.

Negotiation Time (years)

Switzerland – China 4EU – Korea 4

EU – Mexico 4US – Australia 3

EU – Canada 5 (not yet in force)EU – Switzerland 10

Page 20: Economic consequences of brexit OECD April 2016

20

MFN rules for trade with the EU and other countries

FTA with the EU and MFN rules for trade with other countries

Total UK exports -8.1% -6.4%

IntermediatesUK exports -8.4% -6.4%

UK exports to the EU -5.8% -3.1%

UK imports from the EU -9.4% -6.3%

Final private consumption goodsUK exports -8.2% -6.9%UK exports to the EU 0.9% -5.9%UK imports from the EU -9.7% -5.6%

Capital goodsUK exports -6.1% -5.6%UK exports to the EU 6.4% 0.3%UK imports from the EU -1.1% 2.2%

Source: OECD compilation.

Decomposition of the near-term trade shock

Page 21: Economic consequences of brexit OECD April 2016

21

Near-term effects of Brexit on real GDP in the United Kingdom and the European Union

Source: OECD calculations.

Difference from baseline, per cent

Page 22: Economic consequences of brexit OECD April 2016

22

Longer-term consequences of Brexit

Page 23: Economic consequences of brexit OECD April 2016

23

Immigration from the European Union has been rising

Inflows of migrants to the United Kingdom in thousands1

1. Rolling annual data.2. EU15 estimates are for Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Republic of Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Portugal, Spain and Sweden. EU8 estimates are for Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia and Slovenia. EU2 estimates are for Bulgaria and Romania. There is a structural break in the data in 2010. The source for the figures for the period prior to 2010 is the International Passenger Survey, while after 2010 it is the Long-Term International Migration Statistics.

Source: ONS (2016), "Migration Statistics Quarterly Report: February 2016", Office for National Statistics.

Page 24: Economic consequences of brexit OECD April 2016

24

European Union immigrants are well attached to the job market and have good skills

1. PAK: Pakistan. BGD: Bangladesh. Africa excluding South Africa. RoW: Rest of the World. EU27 consists of all 27 EU member states excluding the UK. EU14 refers to Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Portugal, Spain and Sweden. EU8 refers to Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovak Republic and Slovenia. EU refers to Romania and Bulgaria.2. Data refer to population aged between 15 and 64.

Source: ONS (2016), "Labour Market Statistics, March 2016", Office for National Statistics; and Eurostat (2016), "Distribution of the population by educational attainment level", in Migration Integration Indicators (database), January.

Page 25: Economic consequences of brexit OECD April 2016

25

Immigration is an important driver of employment and GDP growth in the United Kingdom

1. The sum of contributions of employment growth by country of birth does not equal the sum of total employment as the series for total employment also includes people who do not state their country of birth or nationality.

Source: ONS (2016), "UK Labour Market: March 2016", Statistical Bulletin, Office for National Statistics; and OECD (2016), OECD Economic Outlook: Statistics and Projections (database), April.

Page 26: Economic consequences of brexit OECD April 2016

26

Immigrant households make a positive net contribution to public finances

Average net direct fiscal contribution of households by migration status of the household head, 2007-2009 average, EUR (PPP adjusted) thousand

Source: OECD (2013), International Migration Outlook 2013..

Page 27: Economic consequences of brexit OECD April 2016

27

The United Kingdom is an attractive destination for foreign direct investment (FDI)

1. EU15 refers to Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden and United Kingdom.

Source: UNCTAD (2016), Foreign Direct Investment (database), United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, April and ONS (2015), "Foreign Direct Investment, 2014", Office for National Statistics, December.

Page 28: Economic consequences of brexit OECD April 2016

28

Estimated gains to the level of labour productivity from reforms related to managerial quality

Percentage points

Source: Adalet McGowan, M. and D. Andrews (2015), "Labour Market Mismatch and Labour Productivity: Evidence from PIAAC Data", OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 1209, OECD Publishing.

Page 29: Economic consequences of brexit OECD April 2016

29

Regulation of network industries is low in the United Kingdom, leaving little scope for further reductions

Index scale of 0-6 from least to most restrictive

Source: OECD (2013), OECD Product Market Regulation Database.

Page 30: Economic consequences of brexit OECD April 2016

30

Source: OECD calculations.

Assumptions for longer-term scenarios

Optimistic Central Pessimistic

Trade % -10 -15 -20

Inward FDI stock % -10 -30 -45

Annual net immigration In thousands -56 -84 -116

Business R&D % of GDP -0.11 -0.29 -0.48

ETCR reduction ETCR index -0.4 -0.2 0

Decline in management quality % -5 -10 -20

UnitScenarios

Page 31: Economic consequences of brexit OECD April 2016

31

Longer-term effects of Brexit on real GDP in the United Kingdom

Difference from baseline, 2030

Source: OECD calculations.

Optimistic scenario Central scenario Pessimistic scenario-6 000

-5 000

-4 000

-3 000

-2 000

-1 000

0

B. GBP cost equivalent per household

Optimistic scenario Central scenario Pessimistic scenario-8

-7

-6

-5

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

A. Impact on real GDPPer cent

Page 32: Economic consequences of brexit OECD April 2016

32

Longer-term effects of Brexit on UK net worth

Difference from baseline, in 2005 prices, 2030

Source: OECD calculations.

Optimistic scenario Central scenario Pessimistic scenario-6 000

-5 000

-4 000

-3 000

-2 000

-1 000

0

B. Impact on net worth per capitaIn GBP

Optimistic scenario Central scenario Pessimistic scenario-6

-5

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

A. Impact on real net worthPer cent

Page 33: Economic consequences of brexit OECD April 2016

33

Conclusion

Page 34: Economic consequences of brexit OECD April 2016

34

Comparison of recent studies on the impact of Brexit on the United Kingdom

Source: OECD calculations; CBI/PwC study: PwC (2016), “Leaving the EU: Implications for the UK economy”, PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) report commissioned by The Confederation of British Industry (CBI).; LSE/CEP study: Dhingra, S., G. Ottaviano, T. Sampson and J. Van Reenen (2016), “The consequences of Brexit for UK trade and living standards”, Centre for Economic Performance (CEP), London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE); and Treasury: HM Treasury (2016), "HM Treasury analysis: the long-term economic impact of EU membership and the alternatives", April 2016.

OECD

WTO/FTA FTA WTOOptimistic ("FTA")

Pessimistic ("WTO")

EEA FTA WTO

Near term 2020GDP (% ) -3.3% -3.1% -5.5% -1.3% -2.6%

GBP cost equivalent per household -2200 -2100 -3700 -900 -1700

Longer term 2030GDP (% ) -5.1% -1.2% -3.5% -3.8% -6.2% -7.5%

Range -2.7% to -7.7% -6.3% to -9.5% -3.4% to -4.3% -4.6% to -7.8% -5.4% to -9.5%GBP cost equivalent per household -3200 -600 -1800 -2600 -4300 -5200

Range -1520 to -5000 -4200 to -6400 -2400 to -2900 -3200 to -5400 -3700 to -6600

Uncertainty in short-term x x x

Tariffs on goods trade with the EU until 2023 x x xNon-tariff barriers on trade with the EU x x x x x x xCurrent FTAs with non-EU countries maintained/replaced

x from 2026 x x

Fall in migration x x xFall in FDI x x x x x XLower private R&D spending x x x XLower managerial skills xDeregulation x x xLower or zero contributions to EU budget x x x x x X x X

CBI / Pw C LSE / CEP Treasury

Outcomes

2020 Static

2030 Dynamic Impact of leaving the EU after 15 years

Channels

gradually replaced

Page 35: Economic consequences of brexit OECD April 2016

35

For more information

Underlying data is available from within the Policy paper document at the following web page.

Disclaimers: The statistical data for Israel are supplied by and under the responsibility of the relevant Israeli authorities. The use of such data by the OECD is without prejudice to the status of the Golan Heights, East Jerusalem and Israeli settlements in the West Bank under the terms of international law.

This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area.

http://www.oecd.org/economy/the-economic-consequences-of-brexit-a-taxing-decision.htm