economic and market watch report - keller williams...
TRANSCRIPT
Economic and Market Watch Report
2nd Quarter, 2009
*Click on a County to view economic and real estate information at the county and zip code level
© 2009 North Texas Real Estate Information Systems, Inc. andNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®
Reproduction, reprinting, or retransmission in any form is prohibited without writtenpermission.
North Texas Real Estate Information Systems, Inc.
Index
North Texas Real Estate Information Systems, Inc. (NTREIS) is a real estate information and technology solution provider serving the real estate community in a coverage area exceeding 16,000 square miles in North Texas, including the Dallas Fort Worth Metropolitan Area.
NTREIS provides information management services to over 16,000 MLS subscribers of its 18 shareholder REALTOR Associations, including over 3,000 real estate offices.
In addition to its information management platform; NTREIS researches, develops and delivers various technology products and services through strategic alliances, utilizing a sales and distribution network which includes its shareholder REALTOR Associations.
Economic and Market Watch Report
Local ReportTexas
1 Bosque County .............................................................................................................2 Callahan County ..........................................................................................................3 Cherokee County .........................................................................................................4 Coleman County ..........................................................................................................5 Collin County ...............................................................................................................7 Comanche County .......................................................................................................8 Cooke County ...............................................................................................................9 Dallas County ...............................................................................................................
12 Delta County ................................................................................................................13 Denton County .............................................................................................................15 Eastland County ..........................................................................................................16 Ellis County ..................................................................................................................18 Erath County ...............................................................................................................19 Fannin County .............................................................................................................21 Fisher County ...............................................................................................................22 Franklin County ..........................................................................................................23 Freestone County .........................................................................................................24 Grayson County ...........................................................................................................26 Hamilton County .........................................................................................................27 Haskell County .............................................................................................................28 Henderson County .......................................................................................................29 Hill County ...................................................................................................................30 Hood County ................................................................................................................31 Hopkins County ...........................................................................................................32 Hunt County .................................................................................................................34 Jack County .................................................................................................................35 Johnson County ...........................................................................................................
37 Jones County ................................................................................................................38 Kaufman County .........................................................................................................39 Lamar County ..............................................................................................................40 Limestone County ........................................................................................................41 Montague County ........................................................................................................42 Navarro County ...........................................................................................................43 Nolan County ...............................................................................................................44 Palo Pinto County ........................................................................................................45 Parker County .............................................................................................................47 Rains County ................................................................................................................48 Red River County ........................................................................................................49 Rockwall County .........................................................................................................50 Smith County ...............................................................................................................52 Somervell County ........................................................................................................53 Stephens County ..........................................................................................................54 Tarrant County ............................................................................................................57 Taylor County ..............................................................................................................59 Upshur County .............................................................................................................60 Van Zandt County .......................................................................................................61 Wise County .................................................................................................................63 Wood County ...............................................................................................................64 Young County ..............................................................................................................
65 Others ...........................................................................................................................
66Trends ...............................................................................................................................................67Chief Economist's Commentary* ...................................................................................................69Economic Monitor* .........................................................................................................................
*Reprinted from Real Estate Outlook: Market Trends and Insights. ©2009 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS ®.Used with permission. Reproduction, reprinting, or retransmission of this article in any form (electronic media included) is prohibited without permission. For subscription information please call 1-800-874-6500.
Local Report
Bosque County, TX
1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market
Buyer's Market
Employment increased by 210 jobs in Bosque County during April and May. However, the number of job seekers also increased. The combined effect of these two trends was an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 6.7% for the first quarter to 7% in the first two months of the second quarter. The solid job growth may provide home sales, while historically low mortgage rates boost affordability.
Labor Market :
Housing Market :
(Forecast)Q1' 09 Q2' 09 Q3' 09
$215,900Average Price $93,600
144# Homes on the Market * 177
5# Homes Sold ** 14
NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***
214Avg # of Days on Market 113 * Available as of Jun. 30, 2009.
*** During the first two months of 2nd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
76634 $128,300 78.69% 7 16.67% 93.6%16976649 $97,500 N/A 1 N/A 92.9%2776652 $91,500 -56.22% 1 0.00% 83.2%2776665 $34,000 -78.40% 1 -50.00% 98.8%16076671 $47,000 -66.43% 2 100.00% 97.4%4876689 $63,500 N/A 1 N/A 100.8%4776690 $31,000 N/A 1 N/A 100.0%51
1
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Callahan County, TX
1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market
Buyer's Market
Employment increased by 69 jobs in Callahan County during April and May. However, the number of job seekers also increased. The combined effect of these two trends was an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 4.8% for the first quarter to 5.3% in the first two months of the second quarter. The solid job growth may provide home sales, while historically low mortgage rates boost affordability.
Labor Market :
Housing Market :
(Forecast)Q1' 09 Q2' 09 Q3' 09
$135,300Average Price $119,200
74# Homes on the Market * 77
14# Homes Sold ** 35
NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***
118Avg # of Days on Market 130 * Available as of Jun. 30, 2009.
*** During the first two months of 2nd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
76443 $80,800 N/A 4 N/A 94.1%11579504 $159,100 100.13% 3 -25.00% 92.4%15079510 $117,700 -1.75% 26 85.71% 96.9%131
OTHER $155,000 0.19% 2 -33.33% 97.1%135
2
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Cherokee County, TX
1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market
Buyer's Market
Employment increased by 513 jobs in Cherokee County during April and May. However, the number of job seekers also increased. The combined effect of these two trends was an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 8.1% for the first quarter to 8.2% in the first two months of the second quarter. The solid job growth may provide home sales, while historically low mortgage rates boost affordability.
Labor Market :
Housing Market :
(Forecast)Q1' 09 Q2' 09 Q3' 09
NAAverage Price $1,055,000
NA# Homes on the Market * 10
NA# Homes Sold ** 1
NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***
NAAvg # of Days on Market 421 * Available as of Jun. 30, 2009.
*** During the first two months of 2nd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
75766 $1,055,000 104.85% 1 0.00% 84.4%421
3
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Coleman County, TX
1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market
Buyer's Market
Employment increased by 86 jobs in Coleman County during April and May. However, the number of job seekers also increased. The combined effect of these two trends was an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 6.1% for the first quarter to 6.3% in the first two months of the second quarter. The solid job growth may provide home sales, while historically low mortgage rates boost affordability.
Labor Market :
Housing Market :
(Forecast)Q1' 09 Q2' 09 Q3' 09
NAAverage Price $64,000
NA# Homes on the Market * 3
NA# Homes Sold ** 1
NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***
NAAvg # of Days on Market 320 * Available as of Jun. 30, 2009.
*** During the first two months of 2nd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
76834 $64,000 146.15% 1 0.00% 91.6%320
4
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Collin County, TX
1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market
Buyer's Market
Employment increased by 2,817 jobs in Collin County during April and May. However, the number of job seekers also increased. The combined effect of these two trends was an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 6.6% for the first quarter to 6.7% in the first two months of the second quarter. The solid job growth may provide home sales, while historically low mortgage rates boost affordability.
Labor Market :
Housing Market :
(Forecast)Q1' 09 Q2' 09 Q3' 09
$230,800Average Price $237,700
6,054# Homes on the Market * 7,646
2,038# Homes Sold ** 2,957
506# New Homes Built *** 475 ***
85Avg # of Days on Market 75 * Available as of Jun. 30, 2009.
*** During the first two months of 2nd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
75002 $204,900 -1.21% 246 -16.04% 97.4%6275009 $191,800 -13.25% 37 15.63% 97.3%9075013 $312,400 -8.17% 162 -22.12% 95.3%9275023 $177,500 -0.34% 141 -31.88% 98.1%4075024 $295,700 5.46% 117 -7.14% 95.5%10975025 $238,500 -5.81% 186 -15.07% 96.9%5475034 $409,200 5.98% 84 -57.79% 95.3%10975035 $227,200 3.04% 280 -5.08% 97.2%66
5
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Collin County, TX
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
75069 $211,400 7.26% 86 -20.37% 95.8%8475070 $228,800 -1.80% 399 -9.73% 96.4%7675071 $223,400 4.20% 163 -19.70% 97.2%8975074 $155,000 -8.12% 92 -31.85% 97.9%6475075 $179,400 -4.42% 93 -13.89% 97.6%5675078 $368,800 6.22% 65 -13.33% 95.1%11875093 $402,900 -16.41% 134 -24.72% 95.8%6375094 $278,100 -6.65% 79 -20.20% 94.5%8775098 $169,800 7.67% 184 -14.81% 96.4%8575166 $207,200 16.60% 15 15.38% 96.5%8975173 $162,900 4.49% 15 -28.57% 97.4%7675252 $275,000 -4.98% 77 2.67% 96.3%8475287 $280,900 -21.29% 49 -12.50% 95.7%5775407 $107,900 -10.60% 52 -8.77% 95.3%6675409 $128,200 1.83% 42 -30.00% 97.6%10375424 $120,000 105.13% 2 -50.00% 86.1%4075442 $99,800 69.44% 10 11.11% 98.1%12075454 $207,900 -7.02% 26 -13.33% 94.6%141
OTHER $221,500 -7.01% 121 -23.90% 96.5%72
6
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Comanche County, TX
1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market
Buyer's Market
In the first two months of the second quarter, 243 jobs were added to the payrolls of Comanche County. As a result of these new jobs, the average monthly unemployment rate fell from 5.4% during the first quarter to 5.1% for April and May. This steady job creation may help to maintain demand for home purchases. Favorable mortgage rates should support this trend.
Labor Market :
Housing Market :
(Forecast)Q1' 09 Q2' 09 Q3' 09
$126,700Average Price $163,600
84# Homes on the Market * 113
6# Homes Sold ** 12
NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***
133Avg # of Days on Market 166 * Available as of Jun. 30, 2009.
*** During the first two months of 2nd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
76442 $105,000 -3.67% 8 -11.11% 91.4%15576444 $283,800 283.51% 2 0.00% 95.5%21476455 $480,000 N/A 1 N/A 91.9%202
OTHER $75,000 66.67% 1 0.00% 60.0%122
7
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Cooke County, TX
1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market
Buyer's Market
Employment increased by 537 jobs in Cooke County during April and May. However, the number of job seekers also increased. The combined effect of these two trends was an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 5.3% for the first quarter to 5.5% in the first two months of the second quarter. The solid job growth may provide home sales, while historically low mortgage rates boost affordability.
Labor Market :
Housing Market :
(Forecast)Q1' 09 Q2' 09 Q3' 09
$178,300Average Price $183,900
322# Homes on the Market * 422
44# Homes Sold ** 58
NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***
114Avg # of Days on Market 149 * Available as of Jun. 30, 2009.
*** During the first two months of 2nd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
76240 $175,400 17.64% 49 -33.78% 94.1%15776272 $220,000 -4.31% 3 -72.73% 99.5%49
OTHER $235,100 24.72% 6 -14.29% 92.3%137
8
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Dallas County, TX
1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market
Buyer's Market
In the first two months of the second quarter, 8,030 jobs were added to the payrolls of Dallas County. As a result of these new jobs, the average monthly unemployment rate fell from 7.4% during the first quarter to 7.2% for April and May. This steady job creation may help to maintain demand for home purchases. Favorable mortgage rates should support this trend.
Labor Market :
Housing Market :
(Forecast)Q1' 09 Q2' 09 Q3' 09
$175,800Average Price $204,200
14,069# Homes on the Market * 17,335
3,704# Homes Sold ** 5,284
564# New Homes Built *** 411 ***
95Avg # of Days on Market 77 * Available as of Jun. 30, 2009.
*** During the first two months of 2nd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
75001 $211,100 -14.43% 23 -41.03% 96.4%8775006 $146,300 3.39% 86 -36.30% 97.4%7175019 $292,100 -9.76% 156 -26.76% 98.0%4475038 $353,500 42.20% 37 -9.76% 94.9%9575039 $335,900 2.19% 16 -36.00% 92.2%10075040 $103,100 -4.98% 149 -8.02% 96.8%5975041 $93,800 5.87% 50 -28.57% 96.5%6975042 $89,600 -4.98% 55 -33.73% 96.4%7775043 $117,900 4.15% 147 -9.26% 97.2%73
9
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Dallas County, TX
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
75044 $181,600 0.94% 123 -8.89% 96.0%6975048 $158,100 -8.93% 55 -1.79% 98.1%6975050 $73,700 -30.14% 36 -29.41% 95.3%8375051 $86,800 4.70% 60 -6.25% 99.1%8675052 $119,300 -7.45% 161 -14.81% 97.1%8175054 $189,000 -13.50% 2 0.00% 99.0%26875060 $99,100 -17.83% 66 -35.29% 96.1%6975061 $109,000 -4.97% 62 -12.68% 94.7%7575062 $126,900 -2.46% 82 -28.70% 95.3%8475063 $260,200 -1.74% 102 -28.17% 97.0%7475080 $172,100 -5.18% 108 -19.40% 98.2%4375081 $153,200 -4.07% 86 -15.69% 96.7%6275082 $182,300 -13.89% 3 -57.14% 95.2%4575088 $143,300 -0.49% 59 -30.59% 96.4%8975089 $142,000 -7.43% 119 -26.99% 97.5%7775104 $137,400 0.66% 157 -24.52% 97.0%8075115 $125,100 -7.47% 188 -22.95% 96.8%9075116 $94,100 8.54% 43 -6.52% 94.0%10775134 $82,500 -6.46% 60 -28.57% 97.4%10675137 $105,700 -1.21% 51 -28.17% 95.8%8075141 $35,400 -36.90% 4 100.00% 99.0%2275146 $84,900 -12.56% 66 -1.49% 95.5%8275149 $75,700 -10.73% 141 -20.34% 98.3%6375150 $83,100 -2.12% 100 -35.48% 98.3%7675159 $77,700 -22.14% 35 -16.67% 95.8%10975172 $85,500 -29.10% 1 0.00% 100.0%6375180 $65,400 -18.25% 36 -38.98% 96.6%7875181 $128,000 -6.36% 81 -22.12% 98.4%6575182 $321,900 -7.84% 11 -54.17% 94.5%10275201 $314,400 -35.49% 32 23.08% 96.2%7975202 $174,000 -18.96% 4 -33.33% 98.0%3575203 $50,500 -50.25% 8 0.00% 92.3%3675204 $243,200 -6.28% 80 -19.19% 95.7%9475205 $974,900 -1.12% 74 -47.14% 96.2%10475206 $277,100 -5.62% 125 0.00% 95.7%8875208 $246,100 12.89% 50 -38.27% 96.6%85
10
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Dallas County, TX
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
75209 $531,500 0.93% 60 -35.48% 96.3%8775211 $96,900 7.43% 59 -11.94% 96.0%6575212 $88,600 -5.44% 13 -13.33% 95.7%11575214 $383,600 -1.64% 170 -18.27% 96.2%7975215 $94,100 28.03% 10 -28.57% 96.2%11775216 $47,500 -4.81% 34 -38.18% 96.2%8075217 $55,000 -5.50% 134 -11.26% 97.4%5175218 $234,200 -4.84% 100 -7.41% 96.7%5875219 $314,700 11.64% 119 -17.36% 97.6%11075220 $240,700 -36.66% 51 -27.14% 91.7%8075223 $211,700 -1.44% 14 -53.33% 95.6%5575224 $87,700 -6.00% 33 -47.62% 96.8%7675225 $1,035,300 -16.69% 78 -26.42% 94.3%11175226 $246,000 -26.41% 1 -50.00% 100.8%28475227 $71,000 -18.48% 73 -33.64% 93.9%8675228 $112,300 -0.71% 128 -10.49% 97.2%6275229 $404,800 -11.31% 100 5.26% 96.9%8075230 $569,100 -8.08% 115 -1.71% 95.1%10175231 $199,800 -8.81% 35 -23.91% 96.5%7175232 $65,100 -2.40% 55 -5.17% 97.8%8875233 $96,100 -4.09% 20 -4.76% 98.1%6275234 $141,200 -20.32% 63 -12.50% 95.3%5575235 $139,600 22.67% 24 60.00% 94.9%7275236 $154,500 34.58% 15 -21.05% 97.4%12475237 $79,500 -25.28% 17 21.43% 97.4%9075238 $239,700 -1.80% 90 -29.69% 96.7%5375240 $180,600 -27.06% 26 0.00% 94.3%7075241 $55,100 -11.56% 56 -23.29% 97.4%5475243 $182,100 11.31% 78 -21.21% 96.8%7475244 $280,400 -16.02% 40 -21.57% 96.9%16175246 $114,900 -43.40% 2 -33.33% 102.6%8175248 $266,700 -13.52% 114 -16.79% 96.5%6175249 $113,900 10.37% 43 -12.24% 99.1%9675253 $79,700 -14.21% 21 -41.67% 93.9%9675254 $206,400 -23.95% 37 -15.91% 98.1%80
OTHER $130,400 -22.43% 66 -41.07% 96.9%81
11
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Delta County, TX
1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market
Buyer's Market
In the first two months of the second quarter, 17 jobs were added to the payrolls of Delta County. As a result of these new jobs, the average monthly unemployment rate fell from 7.2% during the first quarter to 7% for April and May. This steady job creation may help to maintain demand for home purchases. Favorable mortgage rates should support this trend.
Labor Market :
Housing Market :
(Forecast)Q1' 09 Q2' 09 Q3' 09
$38,300Average Price $73,600
56# Homes on the Market * 68
2# Homes Sold ** 12
NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***
105Avg # of Days on Market 113 * Available as of Jun. 30, 2009.
*** During the first two months of 2nd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
75432 $75,400 -20.96% 11 22.22% 91.4%11375469 $54,000 92.86% 1 0.00% 80.0%109
12
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Denton County, TX
1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market
Buyer's Market
A total of 2,402 jobs were created during April and May. The new jobs in Denton County were offset by a proportional increase in the number of job seekers. The net result was no change in the average monthly unemployment rate for the first two months of the second quarter from the 6.4% rate of the first quarter. The new jobs should help demand. Coupled with historically low mortgage rates, these two patterns should help to keep the market moving.
Labor Market :
Housing Market :
(Forecast)Q1' 09 Q2' 09 Q3' 09
$205,200Average Price $215,600
5,102# Homes on the Market * 6,478
1,471# Homes Sold ** 2,408
239# New Homes Built *** 300 ***
82Avg # of Days on Market 72 * Available as of Jun. 30, 2009.
*** During the first two months of 2nd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
75007 $176,300 -0.62% 137 -18.93% 98.3%5775010 $247,200 -2.02% 68 -16.05% 97.0%6575022 $417,200 9.16% 92 -10.68% 96.4%5975028 $242,300 -3.39% 203 -4.69% 97.7%5875034 $312,600 -5.93% 293 -8.15% 96.3%7775056 $208,600 -7.90% 198 -8.33% 96.3%7975057 $139,100 -13.44% 15 50.00% 96.9%8575065 $150,500 -8.34% 34 -33.33% 97.2%90
13
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Denton County, TX
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
75067 $152,200 3.47% 145 -32.56% 98.0%6675068 $162,700 6.62% 195 -11.36% 97.7%7475077 $230,700 -1.62% 134 -26.37% 97.1%6176201 $119,700 6.88% 18 -45.45% 97.3%3476205 $155,400 -9.44% 31 6.90% 96.6%9676207 $144,400 -3.28% 39 -4.88% 98.0%8976208 $180,000 -5.41% 50 -26.47% 96.5%9376209 $121,500 7.05% 61 -18.67% 97.0%11276210 $172,500 -3.79% 187 -5.08% 97.7%6876226 $315,300 -8.50% 101 -15.83% 95.9%7976227 $145,900 2.39% 112 -9.68% 97.9%7176247 $132,400 -7.99% 56 9.80% 96.7%6476249 $122,100 -22.48% 17 -46.88% 98.1%7276258 $156,200 0.26% 9 -43.75% 90.0%9876259 $159,700 27.15% 18 -5.26% 97.1%4976262 $231,400 -11.54% 69 -17.86% 95.1%8576266 $156,700 22.81% 41 -19.61% 94.5%143
OTHER $236,200 -19.30% 85 -14.14% 97.3%64
14
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Eastland County, TX
1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market
Buyer's Market
Employment increased by 130 jobs in Eastland County during April and May. However, the number of job seekers also increased. The combined effect of these two trends was an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 6.2% for the first quarter to 6.8% in the first two months of the second quarter. The solid job growth may provide home sales, while historically low mortgage rates boost affordability.
Labor Market :
Housing Market :
(Forecast)Q1' 09 Q2' 09 Q3' 09
$104,000Average Price $109,200
78# Homes on the Market * 92
11# Homes Sold ** 17
NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***
120Avg # of Days on Market 74 * Available as of Jun. 30, 2009.
*** During the first two months of 2nd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
76435 $57,500 -87.19% 1 0.00% 79.3%13376437 $25,000 -53.79% 1 0.00% 83.3%1076448 $124,500 13.28% 13 -27.78% 88.8%5576470 $77,500 11.03% 2 -33.33% 92.3%204
15
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Ellis County, TX
1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market
Buyer's Market
In the first two months of the second quarter, 490 jobs were added to the payrolls of Ellis County. As a result of these new jobs, the average monthly unemployment rate fell from 7% during the first quarter to 6.9% for April and May. This steady job creation may help to maintain demand for home purchases. Favorable mortgage rates should support this trend.
Labor Market :
Housing Market :
(Forecast)Q1' 09 Q2' 09 Q3' 09
$150,200Average Price $159,700
995# Homes on the Market * 1,234
280# Homes Sold ** 346
106# New Homes Built *** 60 ***
113Avg # of Days on Market 98 * Available as of Jun. 30, 2009.
*** During the first two months of 2nd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
75101 $40,000 -33.33% 1 0.00% 72.7%075119 $120,000 1.10% 28 -50.00% 95.7%12175125 $84,900 25.59% 8 60.00% 98.4%5975152 $84,600 -4.51% 8 0.00% 93.6%6975154 $148,500 -4.81% 71 -27.55% 97.4%11475165 $141,500 -4.13% 92 -14.02% 95.8%8375167 $216,900 8.40% 20 -16.67% 95.5%11476064 $375,000 68.69% 1 -66.67% 94.0%13876065 $186,800 0.97% 105 -16.00% 97.4%99
16
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Ellis County, TX
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
76651 $225,200 169.06% 4 -50.00% 118.7%10576670 $230,000 283.33% 1 0.00% 93.9%366
OTHER $211,200 10.11% 7 -50.00% 97.7%40
17
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Erath County, TX
1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market
Buyer's Market
Employment increased by 581 jobs in Erath County during April and May. However, the number of job seekers also increased. The combined effect of these two trends was an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 5.1% for the first quarter to 5.2% in the first two months of the second quarter. The solid job growth may provide home sales, while historically low mortgage rates boost affordability.
Labor Market :
Housing Market :
(Forecast)Q1' 09 Q2' 09 Q3' 09
$121,700Average Price $123,700
314# Homes on the Market * 420
36# Homes Sold ** 62
NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***
98Avg # of Days on Market 95 * Available as of Jun. 30, 2009.
*** During the first two months of 2nd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
76401 $121,100 -8.05% 49 -39.51% 94.6%9476433 $227,300 -5.49% 3 0.00% 89.4%5176446 $112,100 22.92% 9 125.00% 81.2%124
OTHER $45,000 -79.32% 1 -83.33% 90.0%24
18
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Fannin County, TX
1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market
Buyer's Market
In the first two months of the second quarter, 111 jobs were added to the payrolls of Fannin County. As a result of these new jobs, the average monthly unemployment rate fell from 7.8% during the first quarter to 7.5% for April and May. This steady job creation may help to maintain demand for home purchases. Favorable mortgage rates should support this trend.
Labor Market :
Housing Market :
(Forecast)Q1' 09 Q2' 09 Q3' 09
$104,900Average Price $113,100
280# Homes on the Market * 390
49# Homes Sold ** 54
NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***
133Avg # of Days on Market 77 * Available as of Jun. 30, 2009.
*** During the first two months of 2nd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
75413 $27,000 N/A 1 N/A 90.3%3575418 $97,400 -20.81% 25 -30.56% 95.1%7675438 $78,900 108.73% 3 200.00% 85.6%5375439 $72,000 -40.50% 1 -50.00% 90.0%14775446 $80,000 -32.83% 2 -50.00% 88.9%20575447 $82,500 N/A 2 N/A 94.4%2375452 $182,000 101.33% 9 -18.18% 96.9%8375476 $95,500 30.82% 1 -50.00% 95.5%075479 $86,000 -17.31% 3 0.00% 98.5%108
19
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Fannin County, TX
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
75488 $273,000 115.98% 1 -66.67% 94.1%16875490 $142,300 18.78% 3 -66.67% 98.5%56
OTHER $106,200 103.06% 3 200.00% 97.0%35
20
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Fisher County, TX
1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market
Buyer's Market
Employment increased by 53 jobs in Fisher County during April and May. However, the number of job seekers also increased. The combined effect of these two trends was an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 5.1% for the first quarter to 5.4% in the first two months of the second quarter. The solid job growth may provide home sales, while historically low mortgage rates boost affordability.
Labor Market :
Housing Market :
(Forecast)Q1' 09 Q2' 09 Q3' 09
$38,000Average Price $39,600
1# Homes on the Market * 1
1# Homes Sold ** 1
0# New Homes Built *** 0 ***
14Avg # of Days on Market 10 * Available as of Jun. 30, 2009.
*** During the first two months of 2nd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
79543 $39,600 N/A 1 N/A 111.3%10
21
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Franklin County, TX
1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market
Buyer's Market
A total of 81 jobs were created during April and May. The new jobs in Franklin County were offset by a proportional increase in the number of job seekers. The net result was no change in the average monthly unemployment rate for the first two months of the second quarter from the 5.6% rate of the first quarter. The new jobs should help demand. Coupled with historically low mortgage rates, these two patterns should help to keep the market moving.
Labor Market :
Housing Market :
(Forecast)Q1' 09 Q2' 09 Q3' 09
$450,000Average Price $207,000
43# Homes on the Market * 55
1# Homes Sold ** 5
NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***
131Avg # of Days on Market 181 * Available as of Jun. 30, 2009.
*** During the first two months of 2nd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
OTHER $207,000 338.56% 5 66.67% 89.2%182
22
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Freestone County, TX
1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market
Buyer's Market
A total of 209 jobs were created during April and May. The new jobs in Freestone County were offset by a proportional increase in the number of job seekers. The net result was no change in the average monthly unemployment rate for the first two months of the second quarter from the 5% rate of the first quarter. The new jobs should help demand. Coupled with historically low mortgage rates, these two patterns should help to keep the market moving.
Labor Market :
Housing Market :
(Forecast)Q1' 09 Q2' 09 Q3' 09
$117,000Average Price $120,700
66# Homes on the Market * 83
12# Homes Sold ** 25
NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***
126Avg # of Days on Market 96 * Available as of Jun. 30, 2009.
*** During the first two months of 2nd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
75840 $101,600 -14.19% 13 44.44% 94.4%8475848 $60,000 N/A 1 N/A 95.2%4975859 $274,400 88.46% 3 -57.14% 93.8%16875860 $81,200 -27.04% 5 25.00% 94.0%9176693 $236,600 37.96% 1 0.00% 102.9%103
OTHER $85,000 77.08% 2 100.00% 92.4%109
23
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Grayson County, TX
1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market
Buyer's Market
In the first two months of the second quarter, 411 jobs were added to the payrolls of Grayson County. As a result of these new jobs, the average monthly unemployment rate fell from 7.4% during the first quarter to 7.2% for April and May. This steady job creation may help to maintain demand for home purchases. Favorable mortgage rates should support this trend.
Labor Market :
Housing Market :
(Forecast)Q1' 09 Q2' 09 Q3' 09
$102,500Average Price $121,100
1,086# Homes on the Market * 1,407
186# Homes Sold ** 272
1# New Homes Built *** 1 ***
108Avg # of Days on Market 126 * Available as of Jun. 30, 2009.
*** During the first two months of 2nd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
75020 $102,900 -26.18% 61 -19.74% 94.2%12375021 $90,000 -20.98% 9 -25.00% 93.8%15075058 $188,100 13.72% 6 -50.00% 91.7%9775076 $134,600 -22.82% 25 -26.47% 92.5%15475090 $105,100 -4.19% 40 -35.48% 95.9%13575092 $137,800 8.50% 57 -25.97% 95.2%11075414 $197,000 110.70% 5 0.00% 96.8%24575459 $124,700 -7.08% 8 -46.67% 93.1%20575489 $110,000 12.24% 3 -50.00% 95.8%144
24
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Grayson County, TX
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
75491 $79,100 -16.21% 7 -36.36% 94.3%8275495 $176,400 1.79% 17 -22.73% 92.0%12776233 $80,900 20.57% 5 -28.57% 99.0%8476245 $69,400 -33.33% 7 16.67% 94.9%26276264 $55,000 -74.75% 1 -66.67% 91.8%2476268 $45,300 N/A 1 N/A 107.8%1076271 $161,000 69.83% 3 200.00% 97.0%10176273 $120,300 -26.96% 16 45.45% 95.6%57
OTHER $47,600 -78.84% 1 0.00% 89.9%11
25
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Hamilton County, TX
1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market
Buyer's Market
Employment increased by 138 jobs in Hamilton County during April and May. However, the number of job seekers also increased. The combined effect of these two trends was an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 4.3% for the first quarter to 4.7% in the first two months of the second quarter. The solid job growth may provide home sales, while historically low mortgage rates boost affordability.
Labor Market :
Housing Market :
(Forecast)Q1' 09 Q2' 09 Q3' 09
$62,600Average Price $460,000
45# Homes on the Market * 63
2# Homes Sold ** 6
NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***
38Avg # of Days on Market 112 * Available as of Jun. 30, 2009.
*** During the first two months of 2nd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
76457 $528,600 343.83% 5 -50.00% 105.5%12776531 $117,200 136.29% 1 -50.00% 93.7%41
26
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Haskell County, TX
1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market
Buyer's Market
A total of 87 jobs were created during April and May. The new jobs in Haskell County were offset by a proportional increase in the number of job seekers. The net result was no change in the average monthly unemployment rate for the first two months of the second quarter from the 4.8% rate of the first quarter. The new jobs should help demand. Coupled with historically low mortgage rates, these two patterns should help to keep the market moving.
Labor Market :
Housing Market :
(Forecast)Q1' 09 Q2' 09 Q3' 09
$28,100Average Price $118,500
2# Homes on the Market * NA
2# Homes Sold ** 2
NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***
91Avg # of Days on Market 62 * Available as of Jun. 30, 2009.
*** During the first two months of 2nd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
79544 $191,000 N/A 1 N/A 100.0%85OTHER $46,000 N/A 1 N/A 102.2%39
27
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Henderson County, TX
1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market
Buyer's Market
In the first two months of the second quarter, 662 jobs were added to the payrolls of Henderson County. As a result of these new jobs, the average monthly unemployment rate fell from 7.3% during the first quarter to 6.9% for April and May. This steady job creation may help to maintain demand for home purchases. Favorable mortgage rates should support this trend.
Labor Market :
Housing Market :
(Forecast)Q1' 09 Q2' 09 Q3' 09
$158,300Average Price $198,100
438# Homes on the Market * 564
39# Homes Sold ** 70
9# New Homes Built *** 4 ***
79Avg # of Days on Market 117 * Available as of Jun. 30, 2009.
*** During the first two months of 2nd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
75124 $277,800 183.47% 3 -25.00% 91.2%16475148 $327,700 460.17% 9 350.00% 95.9%12075156 $227,300 65.31% 22 -45.00% 95.6%13175163 $98,900 -56.01% 4 100.00% 90.2%3475751 $149,400 -25.97% 13 -7.14% 95.0%13275752 $180,300 -69.98% 6 50.00% 77.4%12975770 $186,500 -38.65% 1 -83.33% 95.6%2075778 $176,900 -69.76% 1 0.00% 98.6%147
OTHER $118,100 -39.71% 11 -38.89% 93.5%93
28
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Hill County, TX
1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market
Buyer's Market
In the first two months of the second quarter, 474 jobs were added to the payrolls of Hill County. As a result of these new jobs, the average monthly unemployment rate fell from 6.9% during the first quarter to 6.8% for April and May. This steady job creation may help to maintain demand for home purchases. Favorable mortgage rates should support this trend.
Labor Market :
Housing Market :
(Forecast)Q1' 09 Q2' 09 Q3' 09
$112,900Average Price $115,600
288# Homes on the Market * 373
29# Homes Sold ** 49
0# New Homes Built *** 0 ***
109Avg # of Days on Market 119 * Available as of Jun. 30, 2009.
*** During the first two months of 2nd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
76055 $108,000 36.54% 1 -66.67% 100.0%10276621 $151,300 N/A 2 N/A 106.1%9676627 $62,000 -39.57% 1 -66.67% 87.9%8576631 $40,000 -75.76% 1 0.00% 91.5%38076636 $93,500 -77.72% 1 -80.00% 85.0%7476645 $86,100 -19.98% 15 -25.00% 98.2%8376648 $71,800 46.53% 3 -25.00% 85.3%4176692 $147,300 7.83% 23 -34.29% 93.1%149
OTHER $81,000 -29.75% 2 0.00% 95.0%126
29
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Hood County, TX
1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market
Buyer's Market
Employment increased by 546 jobs in Hood County during April and May. However, the number of job seekers also increased. The combined effect of these two trends was an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 5.9% for the first quarter to 6.1% in the first two months of the second quarter. The solid job growth may provide home sales, while historically low mortgage rates boost affordability.
Labor Market :
Housing Market :
(Forecast)Q1' 09 Q2' 09 Q3' 09
$188,800Average Price $202,400
735# Homes on the Market * 1,003
129# Homes Sold ** 179
0# New Homes Built *** 2 ***
109Avg # of Days on Market 103 * Available as of Jun. 30, 2009.
*** During the first two months of 2nd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
76048 $195,200 -19.47% 64 -37.86% 94.4%9176049 $210,400 5.68% 111 -26.00% 96.3%11376476 $98,000 -38.25% 4 0.00% 94.2%41
30
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Hopkins County, TX
1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market
Buyer's Market
In the first two months of the second quarter, 470 jobs were added to the payrolls of Hopkins County. As a result of these new jobs, the average monthly unemployment rate fell from 5.2% during the first quarter to 5.1% for April and May. This steady job creation may help to maintain demand for home purchases. Favorable mortgage rates should support this trend.
Labor Market :
Housing Market :
(Forecast)Q1' 09 Q2' 09 Q3' 09
$124,200Average Price $139,400
219# Homes on the Market * 270
51# Homes Sold ** 61
NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***
130Avg # of Days on Market 96 * Available as of Jun. 30, 2009.
*** During the first two months of 2nd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
75420 $120,700 -10.26% 3 50.00% 98.2%15475431 $305,000 358.65% 1 -50.00% 93.8%53075433 $135,000 4.17% 3 50.00% 98.0%14975437 $750,000 451.47% 1 -66.67% 89.8%18675478 $190,000 N/A 2 N/A 95.0%2475482 $123,100 -0.16% 49 -3.92% 92.2%83
OTHER $135,000 72.41% 2 -33.33% 86.0%73
31
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Hunt County, TX
1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market
Buyer's Market
In the first two months of the second quarter, 266 jobs were added to the payrolls of Hunt County. As a result of these new jobs, the average monthly unemployment rate fell from 7% during the first quarter to 6.8% for April and May. This steady job creation may help to maintain demand for home purchases. Favorable mortgage rates should support this trend.
Labor Market :
Housing Market :
(Forecast)Q1' 09 Q2' 09 Q3' 09
$103,500Average Price $102,200
632# Homes on the Market * 779
131# Homes Sold ** 162
12# New Homes Built *** 4 ***
108Avg # of Days on Market 100 * Available as of Jun. 30, 2009.
*** During the first two months of 2nd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
75135 $109,600 -14.24% 22 29.41% 93.6%7975401 $80,900 23.70% 24 20.00% 90.7%10975402 $107,300 -15.97% 41 -6.82% 95.3%9875422 $56,000 -60.03% 3 -62.50% 84.9%4475423 $52,000 -63.99% 2 0.00% 91.3%27775428 $72,100 -23.13% 6 -57.14% 93.5%12875453 $110,300 -6.68% 7 40.00% 96.1%9275458 $125,000 N/A 1 N/A 89.3%12875474 $86,400 -30.43% 31 -22.50% 91.9%104
32
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Hunt County, TX
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
75496 $90,000 4.77% 2 -60.00% 95.7%86OTHER $145,700 -5.63% 23 -28.13% 95.9%99
33
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Jack County, TX
1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market
Buyer's Market
Employment increased by 72 jobs in Jack County during April and May. However, the number of job seekers also increased. The combined effect of these two trends was an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 4.9% for the first quarter to 5.7% in the first two months of the second quarter. The solid job growth may provide home sales, while historically low mortgage rates boost affordability.
Labor Market :
Housing Market :
(Forecast)Q1' 09 Q2' 09 Q3' 09
$89,500Average Price $68,100
19# Homes on the Market * 20
1# Homes Sold ** 3
NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***
77Avg # of Days on Market 88 * Available as of Jun. 30, 2009.
*** During the first two months of 2nd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
76458 $71,100 -92.06% 2 -33.33% 83.7%93OTHER $62,000 -6.34% 1 0.00% 91.2%79
34
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Johnson County, TX
1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market
Buyer's Market
Employment increased by 612 jobs in Johnson County during April and May. However, the number of job seekers also increased. The combined effect of these two trends was an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 6.7% for the first quarter to 7.3% in the first two months of the second quarter. The solid job growth may provide home sales, while historically low mortgage rates boost affordability.
Labor Market :
Housing Market :
(Forecast)Q1' 09 Q2' 09 Q3' 09
$114,100Average Price $120,900
983# Homes on the Market * 1,204
243# Homes Sold ** 346
106# New Homes Built *** 100 ***
85Avg # of Days on Market 95 * Available as of Jun. 30, 2009.
*** During the first two months of 2nd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
76009 $96,700 9.14% 40 -16.67% 96.1%10076028 $149,100 -5.57% 112 -30.86% 95.9%8876031 $121,400 6.68% 25 -10.71% 94.9%13376033 $133,800 14.46% 70 -29.29% 96.8%9576044 $188,100 21.91% 8 14.29% 97.5%5376050 $121,600 -35.97% 10 -9.09% 93.9%10876058 $67,900 -41.62% 45 -4.26% 94.1%8276059 $74,600 -15.61% 13 225.00% 98.5%108
35
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Johnson County, TX
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
76061 $32,000 N/A 1 N/A 80.2%14676084 $71,100 13.94% 13 -7.14% 95.1%76
OTHER $129,900 -23.95% 9 -55.00% 101.9%143
36
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Jones County, TX
1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market
Buyer's Market
In the first two months of the second quarter, 74 jobs were added to the payrolls of Jones County. As a result of these new jobs, the average monthly unemployment rate fell from 6.9% during the first quarter to 6.6% for April and May. This steady job creation may help to maintain demand for home purchases. Favorable mortgage rates should support this trend.
Labor Market :
Housing Market :
(Forecast)Q1' 09 Q2' 09 Q3' 09
$67,800Average Price $105,400
45# Homes on the Market * 62
11# Homes Sold ** 19
NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***
60Avg # of Days on Market 78 * Available as of Jun. 30, 2009.
*** During the first two months of 2nd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
79501 $99,600 -0.30% 4 0.00% 94.3%4679520 $40,000 -41.94% 1 -90.00% 80.8%3779525 $131,700 57.54% 5 -16.67% 97.4%8779553 $65,000 N/A 2 N/A 96.4%169
OTHER $110,900 -20.44% 7 16.67% 100.3%73
37
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Kaufman County, TX
1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market
Buyer's Market
In the first two months of the second quarter, 319 jobs were added to the payrolls of Kaufman County. As a result of these new jobs, the average monthly unemployment rate fell from 7.4% during the first quarter to 7.2% for April and May. This steady job creation may help to maintain demand for home purchases. Favorable mortgage rates should support this trend.
Labor Market :
Housing Market :
(Forecast)Q1' 09 Q2' 09 Q3' 09
$134,100Average Price $122,700
904# Homes on the Market * 1,129
216# Homes Sold ** 277
10# New Homes Built *** 20 ***
94Avg # of Days on Market 86 * Available as of Jun. 30, 2009.
*** During the first two months of 2nd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
75114 $76,200 -30.16% 14 7.69% 94.9%9775126 $142,700 -8.23% 151 0.00% 98.3%7675142 $88,000 -6.98% 33 -34.00% 93.4%9175143 $91,500 -12.52% 10 -33.33% 93.4%7175147 $54,700 -47.10% 4 -60.00% 91.2%8275158 $171,300 22.97% 4 -50.00% 93.2%16775160 $109,900 -11.66% 50 -19.35% 94.6%11775161 $80,100 -48.36% 9 -40.00% 94.6%61
OTHER $212,500 1.09% 2 -66.67% 96.8%77
38
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Lamar County, TX
1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market
Buyer's Market
In the first two months of the second quarter, 480 jobs were added to the payrolls of Lamar County. As a result of these new jobs, the average monthly unemployment rate fell from 7% during the first quarter to 6.5% for April and May. This steady job creation may help to maintain demand for home purchases. Favorable mortgage rates should support this trend.
Labor Market :
Housing Market :
(Forecast)Q1' 09 Q2' 09 Q3' 09
$102,100Average Price $136,000
137# Homes on the Market * 167
24# Homes Sold ** 33
NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***
117Avg # of Days on Market 120 * Available as of Jun. 30, 2009.
*** During the first two months of 2nd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
75411 $90,500 N/A 1 N/A 95.4%13575416 $235,000 203.23% 1 0.00% 96.0%18475435 $100,000 N/A 1 N/A 71.7%26575460 $102,800 16.16% 15 -6.25% 96.3%14475462 $159,300 -8.71% 11 -35.29% 85.9%7475468 $380,000 199.21% 1 0.00% 96.2%775473 $129,200 -33.44% 3 -40.00% 96.4%143
39
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Limestone County, TX
1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market
Buyer's Market
In the first two months of the second quarter, 286 jobs were added to the payrolls of Limestone County. As a result of these new jobs, the average monthly unemployment rate fell from 5.6% during the first quarter to 5.3% for April and May. This steady job creation may help to maintain demand for home purchases. Favorable mortgage rates should support this trend.
Labor Market :
Housing Market :
(Forecast)Q1' 09 Q2' 09 Q3' 09
$63,000Average Price $67,500
9# Homes on the Market * 20
1# Homes Sold ** 3
NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***
73Avg # of Days on Market 98 * Available as of Jun. 30, 2009.
*** During the first two months of 2nd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
76667 $102,000 55.02% 1 -66.67% 110.3%21OTHER $50,300 N/A 2 N/A 70.8%138
40
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Montague County, TX
1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market
Buyer's Market
Employment increased by 330 jobs in Montague County during April and May. However, the number of job seekers also increased. The combined effect of these two trends was an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 5.4% for the first quarter to 6.3% in the first two months of the second quarter. The solid job growth may provide home sales, while historically low mortgage rates boost affordability.
Labor Market :
Housing Market :
(Forecast)Q1' 09 Q2' 09 Q3' 09
$1,272,400Average Price $143,700
90# Homes on the Market * 103
4# Homes Sold ** 16
NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***
133Avg # of Days on Market 152 * Available as of Jun. 30, 2009.
*** During the first two months of 2nd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
76230 $162,500 88.30% 6 -33.33% 92.7%8576239 $242,300 -54.71% 2 100.00% 97.6%16976255 $119,000 -1.65% 5 25.00% 90.9%19076265 $81,700 -31.34% 3 0.00% 95.5%213
41
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Navarro County, TX
1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market
Buyer's Market
In the first two months of the second quarter, 142 jobs were added to the payrolls of Navarro County. As a result of these new jobs, the average monthly unemployment rate fell from 7.2% during the first quarter to 7% for April and May. This steady job creation may help to maintain demand for home purchases. Favorable mortgage rates should support this trend.
Labor Market :
Housing Market :
(Forecast)Q1' 09 Q2' 09 Q3' 09
$106,100Average Price $107,500
313# Homes on the Market * 389
58# Homes Sold ** 65
NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***
85Avg # of Days on Market 95 * Available as of Jun. 30, 2009.
*** During the first two months of 2nd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
75102 $37,500 -86.58% 1 0.00% 98.7%1475109 $146,900 -5.47% 6 -57.14% 94.3%12175110 $100,100 -7.57% 47 -26.56% 95.7%9175144 $106,300 -60.35% 2 -75.00% 92.6%3475153 $289,300 152.66% 2 0.00% 93.3%22575155 $118,500 43.64% 2 -50.00% 83.2%7576626 $62,800 -15.14% 2 -33.33% 101.2%15976639 $40,000 N/A 1 N/A 69.6%6976641 $84,500 -2.09% 2 -50.00% 102.5%66
42
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Nolan County, TX
1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market
Buyer's Market
Employment increased by 190 jobs in Nolan County during April and May. However, the number of job seekers also increased. The combined effect of these two trends was an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 5.5% for the first quarter to 5.6% in the first two months of the second quarter. The solid job growth may provide home sales, while historically low mortgage rates boost affordability.
Labor Market :
Housing Market :
(Forecast)Q1' 09 Q2' 09 Q3' 09
NAAverage Price $48,000
NA# Homes on the Market * 5
NA# Homes Sold ** 2
NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***
NAAvg # of Days on Market 79 * Available as of Jun. 30, 2009.
*** During the first two months of 2nd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
79545 $64,000 N/A 1 N/A 91.4%3279556 $32,000 -52.59% 1 -80.00% 88.9%126
43
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Palo Pinto County, TX
1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market
Buyer's Market
Employment increased by 210 jobs in Palo Pinto County during April and May. However, the number of job seekers also increased. The combined effect of these two trends was an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 6.4% for the first quarter to 6.7% in the first two months of the second quarter. The solid job growth may provide home sales, while historically low mortgage rates boost affordability.
Labor Market :
Housing Market :
(Forecast)Q1' 09 Q2' 09 Q3' 09
$178,900Average Price $285,700
358# Homes on the Market * 475
42# Homes Sold ** 58
NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***
132Avg # of Days on Market 139 * Available as of Jun. 30, 2009.
*** During the first two months of 2nd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
76067 $90,800 -29.01% 26 -3.70% 91.7%8876449 $508,100 19.24% 19 0.00% 91.5%18776453 $86,300 -38.75% 2 -33.33% 91.0%14576472 $62,600 N/A 2 N/A 87.2%5176475 $546,700 -37.90% 6 20.00% 87.9%18976484 $50,100 -74.24% 1 -80.00% 111.5%63
OTHER $462,500 -23.94% 2 -75.00% 85.6%306
44
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Parker County, TX
1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market
Buyer's Market
Employment increased by 444 jobs in Parker County during April and May. However, the number of job seekers also increased. The combined effect of these two trends was an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 6.4% for the first quarter to 6.9% in the first two months of the second quarter. The solid job growth may provide home sales, while historically low mortgage rates boost affordability.
Labor Market :
Housing Market :
(Forecast)Q1' 09 Q2' 09 Q3' 09
$171,900Average Price $178,100
1,209# Homes on the Market * 1,576
240# Homes Sold ** 326
176# New Homes Built *** 37 ***
108Avg # of Days on Market 90 * Available as of Jun. 30, 2009.
*** During the first two months of 2nd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
76008 $258,300 -6.14% 39 -53.01% 96.0%8676066 $41,100 -75.82% 2 100.00% 102.8%16476082 $101,500 -14.71% 48 -18.64% 96.7%8476085 $153,800 -5.35% 34 -2.86% 96.6%8976086 $121,400 4.12% 54 -31.65% 96.7%7776087 $202,900 -7.35% 80 -22.33% 96.9%9176088 $198,600 6.43% 20 -37.50% 98.1%14176487 $209,500 25.45% 3 -57.14% 98.6%93
45
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Parker County, TX
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
OTHER $226,500 1.48% 46 35.29% 96.6%95
46
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Rains County, TX
1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market
Buyer's Market
A total of 6 jobs were created during April and May. The new jobs in Rains County were offset by a proportional increase in the number of job seekers. The net result was no change in the average monthly unemployment rate for the first two months of the second quarter from the 6.8% rate of the first quarter. The new jobs should help demand. Coupled with historically low mortgage rates, these two patterns should help to keep the market moving.
Labor Market :
Housing Market :
(Forecast)Q1' 09 Q2' 09 Q3' 09
$119,600Average Price $155,200
102# Homes on the Market * 123
11# Homes Sold ** 14
NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***
164Avg # of Days on Market 113 * Available as of Jun. 30, 2009.
*** During the first two months of 2nd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
75440 $195,700 8.30% 9 -10.00% 95.5%6375472 $92,400 -19.09% 4 -71.43% 89.1%236
OTHER $41,700 -81.26% 1 -50.00% 92.7%80
47
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Red River County, TX
1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market
Buyer's Market
In the first two months of the second quarter, 62 jobs were added to the payrolls of Red River County. As a result of these new jobs, the average monthly unemployment rate fell from 8.2% during the first quarter to 8% for April and May. This steady job creation may help to maintain demand for home purchases. Favorable mortgage rates should support this trend.
Labor Market :
Housing Market :
(Forecast)Q1' 09 Q2' 09 Q3' 09
$66,900Average Price $233,100
26# Homes on the Market * 26
3# Homes Sold ** 3
NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***
58Avg # of Days on Market 148 * Available as of Jun. 30, 2009.
*** During the first two months of 2nd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
75412 $472,300 N/A 1 N/A 82.2%38975426 $132,000 6.02% 1 -75.00% 88.3%2475436 $95,000 19.20% 1 -50.00% 102.7%31
48
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Rockwall County, TX
1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market
Buyer's Market
In the first two months of the second quarter, 263 jobs were added to the payrolls of Rockwall County. As a result of these new jobs, the average monthly unemployment rate fell from 6.5% during the first quarter to 6.3% for April and May. This steady job creation may help to maintain demand for home purchases. Favorable mortgage rates should support this trend.
Labor Market :
Housing Market :
(Forecast)Q1' 09 Q2' 09 Q3' 09
$211,300Average Price $205,400
916# Homes on the Market * 1,168
223# Homes Sold ** 309
98# New Homes Built *** 74 ***
91Avg # of Days on Market 87 * Available as of Jun. 30, 2009.
*** During the first two months of 2nd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
75032 $266,200 -10.34% 109 -26.35% 94.9%9475087 $188,600 -6.82% 119 11.21% 96.4%9075132 $151,400 -18.82% 4 -33.33% 98.5%4675189 $143,500 4.36% 53 -19.70% 97.5%86
OTHER $158,400 15.87% 24 20.00% 99.3%58
49
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Smith County, TX
1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market
Buyer's Market
A total of 1,126 jobs were created during April and May. The new jobs in Smith County were offset by a proportional increase in the number of job seekers. The net result was no change in the average monthly unemployment rate for the first two months of the second quarter from the 6.7% rate of the first quarter. The new jobs should help demand. Coupled with historically low mortgage rates, these two patterns should help to keep the market moving.
Labor Market :
Housing Market :
(Forecast)Q1' 09 Q2' 09 Q3' 09
$155,700Average Price $172,800
212# Homes on the Market * 260
22# Homes Sold ** 33
27# New Homes Built *** 22 ***
132Avg # of Days on Market 110 * Available as of Jun. 30, 2009.
*** During the first two months of 2nd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
75701 $64,900 -45.23% 3 50.00% 89.6%9275702 $76,000 7.80% 2 0.00% 93.8%19775703 $98,000 -76.09% 1 -75.00% 98.5%8475704 $201,500 N/A 1 N/A 100.8%7975707 $335,700 N/A 2 N/A 95.2%4675709 $140,600 18.15% 1 0.00% 100.8%13275750 $235,000 -31.63% 1 -75.00% 95.9%5275757 $152,500 N/A 2 N/A 94.9%142
50
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Smith County, TX
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
75771 $156,700 -18.98% 17 -26.09% 96.9%10275791 $120,300 -49.88% 2 100.00% 96.7%74
OTHER $800,000 515.38% 1 0.00% 100.0%360
51
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Somervell County, TX
1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market
Buyer's Market
Employment increased by 89 jobs in Somervell County during April and May. However, the number of job seekers also increased. The combined effect of these two trends was an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 5.8% for the first quarter to 6.2% in the first two months of the second quarter. The solid job growth may provide home sales, while historically low mortgage rates boost affordability.
Labor Market :
Housing Market :
(Forecast)Q1' 09 Q2' 09 Q3' 09
$181,100Average Price $190,100
81# Homes on the Market * 102
11# Homes Sold ** 13
NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***
109Avg # of Days on Market 85 * Available as of Jun. 30, 2009.
*** During the first two months of 2nd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
76043 $157,100 -19.02% 9 -55.00% 91.9%8376070 $180,000 N/A 1 N/A 90.5%5676077 $164,000 -24.91% 1 -50.00% 100.0%151
OTHER $356,900 239.90% 2 100.00% 94.8%76
52
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Stephens County, TX
1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market
Buyer's Market
Employment increased by 129 jobs in Stephens County during April and May. However, the number of job seekers also increased. The combined effect of these two trends was an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 5.2% for the first quarter to 5.6% in the first two months of the second quarter. The solid job growth may provide home sales, while historically low mortgage rates boost affordability.
Labor Market :
Housing Market :
(Forecast)Q1' 09 Q2' 09 Q3' 09
$131,500Average Price $121,200
14# Homes on the Market * 14
3# Homes Sold ** 5
NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***
185Avg # of Days on Market 263 * Available as of Jun. 30, 2009.
*** During the first two months of 2nd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
76424 $99,300 -13.43% 3 -72.73% 94.4%159OTHER $153,900 -67.60% 2 100.00% 88.8%420
53
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Tarrant County, TX
1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market
Buyer's Market
In the first two months of the second quarter, 7,397 jobs were added to the payrolls of Tarrant County. As a result of these new jobs, the average monthly unemployment rate fell from 6.9% during the first quarter to 6.8% for April and May. This steady job creation may help to maintain demand for home purchases. Favorable mortgage rates should support this trend.
Labor Market :
Housing Market :
(Forecast)Q1' 09 Q2' 09 Q3' 09
$167,900Average Price $177,100
11,703# Homes on the Market * 14,635
3,313# Homes Sold ** 4,806
888# New Homes Built *** 701 ***
82Avg # of Days on Market 78 * Available as of Jun. 30, 2009.
*** During the first two months of 2nd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
76001 $143,300 -10.38% 101 -27.86% 98.1%6076002 $138,100 -2.26% 133 -26.52% 98.9%6976006 $194,300 15.24% 27 -34.15% 95.2%9776010 $63,300 -2.91% 64 -17.95% 94.8%9076011 $95,700 -19.78% 16 -42.86% 94.5%9576012 $158,700 -18.11% 66 -8.33% 96.6%7376013 $148,500 9.68% 59 -38.54% 96.1%8576014 $80,200 -2.20% 39 -41.79% 97.8%9276015 $111,200 2.68% 32 -8.57% 95.7%85
54
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Tarrant County, TX
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
76016 $171,100 3.51% 105 -18.60% 95.8%7576017 $130,700 -8.92% 131 -25.57% 97.2%6376018 $103,500 -1.71% 77 -31.86% 98.5%6476019 $115,000 N/A 1 N/A 100.0%1276020 $142,600 -0.70% 41 -44.59% 95.0%9176021 $181,800 1.39% 105 -30.00% 97.2%5576022 $122,100 -0.57% 27 -22.86% 98.5%6176034 $473,700 -2.47% 90 -28.00% 97.1%8076036 $117,500 -17.77% 58 -33.33% 96.8%8276039 $169,700 6.39% 61 -32.22% 96.6%5576040 $141,700 -8.05% 59 5.36% 96.3%8276051 $259,800 5.74% 108 -43.16% 96.5%5976052 $193,400 0.10% 68 -40.87% 96.0%8476053 $112,000 -11.95% 64 -23.81% 97.7%4976054 $191,300 -2.00% 30 -46.43% 97.4%4276060 $203,400 -19.45% 22 57.14% 95.0%8976063 $185,000 -6.71% 220 -19.41% 96.8%7176092 $600,300 -3.30% 110 -27.63% 96.5%10276102 $304,800 37.61% 6 -62.50% 93.2%16676103 $71,100 -7.78% 39 -2.50% 95.6%12076104 $123,400 94.03% 15 25.00% 95.0%15776105 $35,400 -32.05% 20 66.67% 95.1%9676106 $63,200 0.32% 21 -19.23% 93.9%7576107 $246,300 -10.34% 79 -28.18% 94.5%9376108 $119,400 8.35% 121 -11.68% 97.1%8876109 $341,100 -4.43% 90 1.12% 95.6%7376110 $206,400 -6.18% 48 -26.15% 95.4%8576111 $76,200 -7.19% 32 -15.79% 97.0%6076112 $106,500 12.34% 74 -32.73% 97.9%8176114 $72,800 -35.52% 56 9.80% 97.1%8176115 $56,100 -10.67% 13 -13.33% 97.1%6176116 $183,200 -3.07% 98 -11.71% 95.6%6676117 $73,000 -8.29% 40 -36.51% 97.7%5176118 $133,800 11.13% 45 -31.82% 98.7%8476119 $51,400 -2.65% 30 -26.83% 97.9%7276120 $125,000 -1.19% 36 -10.00% 97.4%56
55
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Tarrant County, TX
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
76123 $130,300 -1.14% 118 -23.38% 97.8%8476126 $203,900 15.72% 58 -31.76% 94.4%10376131 $137,300 -0.44% 111 -33.53% 97.6%7976132 $251,900 -29.14% 48 -31.43% 94.1%8876133 $102,200 -1.73% 137 -16.46% 97.8%7476134 $88,000 -1.12% 56 -32.53% 98.0%11076135 $107,500 -27.76% 51 -22.73% 97.7%5876137 $129,700 -1.82% 169 -26.20% 98.4%6776140 $77,000 -17.74% 65 -37.50% 96.9%8476148 $98,000 -3.26% 86 -9.47% 96.8%4976164 $70,300 1.01% 6 -25.00% 101.2%6676177 $152,100 -1.62% 15 -37.50% 99.0%4276179 $167,600 -3.07% 197 -28.10% 97.6%9276180 $182,200 0.66% 167 -19.32% 97.1%7376248 $224,100 -0.44% 478 -18.98% 96.9%80
OTHER $217,900 -9.47% 267 -18.60% 96.3%103
56
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Taylor County, TX
1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market
Buyer's Market
In the first two months of the second quarter, 642 jobs were added to the payrolls of Taylor County. As a result of these new jobs, the average monthly unemployment rate fell from 4.9% during the first quarter to 4.8% for April and May. This steady job creation may help to maintain demand for home purchases. Favorable mortgage rates should support this trend.
Labor Market :
Housing Market :
(Forecast)Q1' 09 Q2' 09 Q3' 09
$123,900Average Price $138,800
891# Homes on the Market * 1,056
265# Homes Sold ** 411
51# New Homes Built *** 28 ***
93Avg # of Days on Market 73 * Available as of Jun. 30, 2009.
*** During the first two months of 2nd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
79508 $151,700 21.36% 2 0.00% 96.4%5479530 $947,700 N/A 1 N/A 135.6%4179536 $99,500 30.58% 4 -55.56% 96.2%4279541 $80,000 -62.62% 1 0.00% 91.4%13079562 $224,000 28.15% 17 -5.56% 98.1%8379601 $114,400 -10.20% 30 -37.50% 95.5%7879602 $146,700 -8.43% 105 6.06% 97.7%8779603 $75,400 -5.63% 56 -34.12% 97.1%7479605 $108,300 12.11% 90 -23.73% 94.6%59
57
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Taylor County, TX
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
79606 $178,000 11.39% 105 -11.76% 95.2%71
58
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Upshur County, TX
1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market
Buyer's Market
Employment increased by 80 jobs in Upshur County during April and May. However, the number of job seekers also increased. The combined effect of these two trends was an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 6.3% for the first quarter to 7% in the first two months of the second quarter. The solid job growth may provide home sales, while historically low mortgage rates boost affordability.
Labor Market :
Housing Market :
(Forecast)Q1' 09 Q2' 09 Q3' 09
$143,900Average Price $345,000
10# Homes on the Market * 11
3# Homes Sold ** 1
NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***
159Avg # of Days on Market 16 * Available as of Jun. 30, 2009.
*** During the first two months of 2nd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
75755 $345,000 -19.20% 1 0.00% 95.8%16
59
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Van Zandt County, TX
1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market
Buyer's Market
Employment increased by 634 jobs in Van Zandt County during April and May. However, the number of job seekers also increased. The combined effect of these two trends was an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 5.9% for the first quarter to 6.1% in the first two months of the second quarter. The solid job growth may provide home sales, while historically low mortgage rates boost affordability.
Labor Market :
Housing Market :
(Forecast)Q1' 09 Q2' 09 Q3' 09
$155,300Average Price $136,500
411# Homes on the Market * 503
45# Homes Sold ** 70
NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***
140Avg # of Days on Market 121 * Available as of Jun. 30, 2009.
*** During the first two months of 2nd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
75103 $136,500 4.12% 26 4.00% 95.6%11775117 $257,200 85.44% 8 14.29% 90.4%19375140 $88,500 -8.10% 4 -69.23% 94.7%17275169 $103,600 -22.74% 22 -26.67% 93.5%10375754 $133,000 -42.27% 2 -66.67% 92.0%4275790 $160,600 1.84% 5 66.67% 91.8%138
OTHER $82,000 -15.98% 3 -50.00% 94.6%65
60
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Wise County, TX
1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market
Buyer's Market
Employment increased by 233 jobs in Wise County during April and May. However, the number of job seekers also increased. The combined effect of these two trends was an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 6.9% for the first quarter to 7.9% in the first two months of the second quarter. The solid job growth may provide home sales, while historically low mortgage rates boost affordability.
Labor Market :
Housing Market :
(Forecast)Q1' 09 Q2' 09 Q3' 09
$152,000Average Price $147,000
510# Homes on the Market * 675
85# Homes Sold ** 104
NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***
107Avg # of Days on Market 108 * Available as of Jun. 30, 2009.
*** During the first two months of 2nd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
76023 $95,100 -46.18% 3 -57.14% 95.2%18276071 $133,300 13.25% 5 -16.67% 96.2%11576073 $159,900 -15.40% 6 -50.00% 93.2%5576078 $129,300 7.75% 21 -16.00% 90.9%9176225 $112,000 -19.71% 1 -92.86% 94.5%3776234 $185,400 -5.60% 30 -38.78% 96.3%13476426 $138,900 -9.51% 25 -30.56% 93.3%11076431 $145,000 -6.99% 1 -87.50% 100.0%32
61
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Wise County, TX
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
OTHER $114,500 -46.24% 12 9.09% 91.0%94
62
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Wood County, TX
1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market
Buyer's Market
In the first two months of the second quarter, 448 jobs were added to the payrolls of Wood County. As a result of these new jobs, the average monthly unemployment rate fell from 7% during the first quarter to 6.9% for April and May. This steady job creation may help to maintain demand for home purchases. Favorable mortgage rates should support this trend.
Labor Market :
Housing Market :
(Forecast)Q1' 09 Q2' 09 Q3' 09
$240,600Average Price $147,600
250# Homes on the Market * 343
26# Homes Sold ** 33
NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***
148Avg # of Days on Market 144 * Available as of Jun. 30, 2009.
*** During the first two months of 2nd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
75410 $250,300 -42.62% 3 -50.00% 95.4%11475494 $118,700 5.04% 11 -8.33% 93.1%18575497 $146,000 -38.37% 1 -75.00% 94.3%19575765 $482,500 286.93% 1 -75.00% 60.3%23175773 $133,300 -31.25% 13 -7.14% 95.2%10575783 $113,000 -39.25% 4 -66.67% 90.0%147
63
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Young County, TX
1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market
Buyer's Market
Employment increased by 305 jobs in Young County during April and May. However, the number of job seekers also increased. The combined effect of these two trends was an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 5.4% for the first quarter to 5.7% in the first two months of the second quarter. The solid job growth may provide home sales, while historically low mortgage rates boost affordability.
Labor Market :
Housing Market :
(Forecast)Q1' 09 Q2' 09 Q3' 09
$89,000Average Price $109,600
26# Homes on the Market * 36
5# Homes Sold ** 6
NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***
83Avg # of Days on Market 124 * Available as of Jun. 30, 2009.
*** During the first two months of 2nd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
76450 $109,600 -27.27% 6 20.00% 95.5%125
64
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
Local Report
Others
Zip Code Average Price Price Change***
Total #Homes Sold
(Quarter)
% Change in #Homes Sold
***
Average Dayson Market
% of Asking Price(Sold/
List Price)
Data by Zip Codes for Q2 2009
74728 $99,300 N/A 5 N/A 92.6%19674764 $73,500 N/A 1 N/A 83.1%4375455 $256,800 -21.97% 2 -50.00% 95.1%13675501 $37,600 -9.62% 5 0.00% 86.1%12775503 $45,300 -35.19% 2 100.00% 85.7%4575551 $62,000 37.78% 1 0.00% 103.3%1075567 $126,700 283.94% 1 0.00% 94.6%1375571 $215,000 53.57% 1 0.00% 78.2%7875636 $33,500 N/A 1 N/A 90.3%875686 $57,500 N/A 2 N/A 77.8%11375956 $68,500 N/A 1 N/A 94.0%2276539 $29,600 -59.00% 1 0.00% 74.0%9176705 $46,000 N/A 1 N/A 98.1%4076712 $100,800 N/A 1 N/A 100.0%12776801 $32,900 -42.58% 3 -40.00% 89.6%2976802 $94,500 98.95% 1 -50.00% 96.5%15276856 $70,500 N/A 2 N/A 96.9%4076933 $31,100 N/A 1 N/A 76.2%12276945 $28,900 -24.15% 1 0.00% 96.7%4977334 $42,500 N/A 1 N/A 100.0%2477340 $109,900 -31.95% 2 0.00% 86.2%3579529 $149,900 N/A 1 N/A 93.7%34179549 $77,000 79.07% 3 50.00% 88.8%5279761 $110,000 N/A 1 N/A 97.8%17
65
*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.
You’ve Got to Fall Before You Can Pick Yourself Up By Ken Fears Manager, Regional Economics The national housing market peaked in 2006, but some local markets peaked before this period, while others were still on the upswing through 2007. Today, most markets are in decline as a result of the economic recession, problems in the mortgage markets and a hangover from the subprime mess. Critical to a recovery is eliminating the perception of the local market as being in decline and crucial to this change is defining the “bottom” in the market covered by North Texas Real Estate Information Systems. Nationally, the median price peaked in the third quarter of 2005. Since then, it has fallen 23.5%. Over the last 12 months, the median home price has fallen 15.7%. Thus, 60.4% of the national price decline took place in the last 12 months ending in June of this year. Sales have followed suit. After peaking in the third quarter of 2005, the quarterly sales volume declined 34.5%, but only 3.6% in the 12 month period ending in June. The bulk of the decline in sales, 92.9%, occurred prior to the large price declines of the last 12 months. This pattern makes sense. After years of a strong sellers’ market, sellers were reluctant to recognize the change in affordability as mortgage rates began to creep up in the middle of 2005. As financing and demand dried up, sellers were forced to re‐evaluate their asking prices in an environment of excess supply and economic pessimism. The delay to re‐price exacerbated the price correction.
$ 0
$ 5 0 ,0 0 0
$ 1 0 0 ,0 0 0
$ 1 5 0 ,0 0 0
$ 2 0 0 ,0 0 0
$ 2 5 0 ,0 0 0
200 5Q1
200 5Q3
200 6Q 1
20 06Q 3
20 07Q 1
20 07Q 3
20 08Q 1
20 08Q 3
2 009Q1
2 ,0 0 0
3 ,0 0 0
4 ,0 0 0
5 ,0 0 0
6 ,0 0 0
7 ,0 0 0
8 ,0 0 0
N ati on a l M e dia n P r ice (Pin k ) an d S a le Vo lu m e (B l ue)
Locally, the housing market reached its peak price in the second quarter of 2007 with an average price of $205,304. Today, 8 quarters later, the average price stands at $190,520, a peak‐to‐date decline of 7.2%. Over the last twelve months the average price has fallen $10,998 which accounts for roughly 74.4% of the total peak‐to‐date price decline. Sales are down 31.7% since their peak in the second quarter of 2007 through the second quarter of 2009. Over the last 12 months, sales have fallen 21.0%, making it too early to tell if the seasonally‐adjusted pattern of local decline is over. Nationally, neither sales nor prices appear to have clearly defined a bottom, yet. When that process is done, consumers are more likely to gain the confidence that they need to get in the market. 66
Commentary
67
“Appraising” the Situationby Lawrence Yun, NAR Chief Economist
As I write this, we are about to celebrate the 4th of July – Independence Day. What started as arevolt against unfair taxes became a revolution against an imperial government intruding intothe lives and business activities of colonial citizens. Tea tax, stamp tax, burdensomeregulations and rules that impede the free flow of goods and trade. Thank goodness we areblessed to live in the land of the free.
Of course, for many households and businesses today, independence is tempered by thecurrent economic environment. We have seen improvement in our economy, but we need tosee more – especially in the real estate sector. Let first take a look at the latest developments.
The latest residential housing market figures do indeed give me some hope. Existing-homesales rose 2.4 percent in May. May’s increase follows a rise in re-sales in April as well. That’sthe first back-to-back monthly increase in existing-home sales since September of 2005.Pending sales also rose. And while May’s pending home sales index of 90.7 represented amere 0.1 percent from the previous month’s (upwardly revised) reading of 90.6, it was 6.7percent higher than the index in May 2008. Indeed, May’s pending home sales index was thefourth consecutive monthly gain since October of 2004. Housing affordability continues athistorically high levels as well. NAR's Housing Affordability Index in May was 171.6. While thatis off from April’s revised reading of 178.8, the index last May was 129.8. And remember thatApril’s index was the highest reading ever recorded since NAR began tracking housingaffordability in 1970.
So what’s holding back our “independence” from the current recession and a true housingrecovery? First and foremost – jobs. June’s employment figures showed that employers cut467,000 payroll jobs during the month – a much larger number than most analysts expected.And the good news that May’s job cuts were smaller than originally estimated (322,000 ratherthan 345,000) was offset by revised April employment figures which showed 15,000 morelayoffs than originally thought. The national unemployment rate rose to 9.5 percent – that’s thehighest level in 26 years. It’s likely that the unemployment rate will surely breach the double-digit threshold before it starts to trend back down in 2010.
But another factor which seems to be impeding a housing recovery is new appraisal rules andthey could be impacting the time it takes from contract to closing. There is a growing lag timebetween the pending home sales and closed sales. Traditionally, sales close one to twomonths after a contract is signed.In the past month, we’ve heard from a number of REAL TORS® that the appraisal process istaking longer.
The appraisal issue is a bit complicated. For instance, distressed homes often are selling for20 percent less than normal homes in the same area. (In May, distressed propertiesaccounted for almost a third of all existing-home sales.) But some appraisals don’t distinguishbetween traditional homes and distressed properties.
68
Commentary
In many cases appraisers from outside the area are being used. They are hired by large,national lenders, perhaps with little knowledge about a local real estate market. The intentionsof the new appraisal rules were to improve accuracy by removing undue pressure for inflationvaluations. But the pendulum may have swung too far in the other direction, leading tounintended negative consequences, including consumers paying higher fees, and appraisersreceiving lower compensation.
Another consequence is a “lower quality” of appraisals – many appraisers themselves (andREALTORS® as well) have indicated to me that they’ve seen lower quality of appraisalsbecause those appraisals do not take into consideration unique housing features. The result ofall of these “unintended consequences” from the new appraisal rules: the housing marketrecovery being unnecessarily delayed.
(More details about the new appraisal rules, current legislation under consideration andNAR’s efforts on this issue are available at www.realtor.org. The Association also has a“blog” on which you can share your concern and latest experiences with the new appraisalrules.)
All real estate is local and appraisals should be done by an expert with local expertise. Speedyclarification of the appraisal rules could smooth a housing market recovery and support theoverall economy. NAR is currently conducting a study to assess the degree to which newappraisal rules are imp acting home sales. And NAR is working with policymakers to ensurethat appraisals are conducted so that home buyers and sellers can conduct their transactionswith REALTORS® in a cost-effective and time-efficient manner.
So let’s declare a bit more of our independence – and freedom from restrictive rules that areholding back a vigorous housing recovery. Only when that happens will we be free from thereins – and the reign – of our recession.
Mortgage Rates remain at historic lows. The average rate on a 30-yearfixed mortgage loan was 5.42% in June. While an increase from May’saverage rate of 4.86%, it is well below the 6.32% average in June of 2008.As the economy begins to turn the corner, look for mortgage rates to inchupward although remaining well below 6% for the foreseeable future.
Existing Home Sales r2.4% in May to a seasonally adjusted annual rateof 4.77 million units. The inventory of existing homes available for sale fellto 3.80 million units – a 9.6 month supply at the current sales pace. Thenational median sales price for an existing home was $173,000 in May, a16.8% decline from the price registered a year ago.
New Home Sales slipped in May, posting a seasonally adjusted annualizedrate of 342,000 units. The pace is 0.6% off the revised April level of344,000 units, and 32.8% below the level registered in May of 2008. Newhome inventory continued to decline, with 292,000 units available for sale atthe end of May – a 10.2 month supply at the current sales rate.Housing Starts rose in May to a seasonally adjusted annualized rate of532,000 units – a 17.2% increase from April’s level, but 45.2% off the levelin May of 2008. Single-family starts increased 7.5% from the previousmonth. Building permits – generally a reliable indicator of future starts –also rose in May – by 4.0% – but were still 47.0% down from their level ayear ago.
Employment The job market continues to hold back any meaningful“quick start” to the economic recovery. Employers cut 467,000 payrolls inJune. Businesses will continue to hold back on hiring until the creditmarkets loosen up and they are convinced that the economy is moving inthe right direction.
Economic Growth GDP growth in the first quarter declined 5.5%(SAAR) – slightly better than earlier estimates. This is the third and finalestimate of GDP based on more complete data. Among the factors“raising” the GDP figure was the level of imports which droppedsignificantly more than earlier estimated. Consumer spending increased1.4% – the highest it has been in almost two years.
Housing Affordability continues to be at historic highs. NAR’s housingaffordability index (HAI) in May posted a reading of 171.6 – down fromApril’s record-setting level of 178.8, but well above the 129.8 indexregistered in May of 2008. Affordability has been consistently above the170.0 mark since the beginning of the year.
Economic Monitor
This table reflects data available throughJuly 3rd of 2009.
June 09 5.42%May 09 4.86%June 08 6.32%
Could spike ifinflationappears
Monthly IndicatorForecastRecent
Statistics
Likely DirectionOver the Next
Six Months
May 09 4,770Apr 09 4,660May 08 4,950
Momentum buildingand broadening tomore geographicregions
Very few spechome sales
Recovery takinghold only from2010
Tough job marketin 2009
Sluggish rebound
Very high already
Notes: All rate are seasonally adjusted. New home sales, existing home sales, and housing starts are shown in thousands. Employment growth is shown asmonth-to-month change in thousands. Inflation is shown as the month-to-month change in the Consumer Price Index. Sources: NAR, Bureau of theCensus, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Freddie Mac, and the Mortgage Bankers Association
69
June 09 -467May 09 -32212-monthtotal: -5,664
2009:I -5.5%2008:IV -6.3%2008:I -1.0%
May 09 342Apr 09 344May 08 509
May 09 532Apr 09 454May 08 971
May 09 171.6Apr 09 178.8May 08 129.8