econ1006 02 roots 091006a no blues

Upload: nitinusms

Post on 04-Apr-2018

221 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/29/2019 Econ1006 02 Roots 091006a No Blues

    1/32

    2.1 Balance of trade and wealth of nation

    2.2 The Quantity Theory of Money

    2.3 Efficiency in production

    2.4 Measuring national income

    UCL ECON1006. HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT. Hugh Goodacre.

    2. SOME ROOTS OF ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

  • 7/29/2019 Econ1006 02 Roots 091006a No Blues

    2/32

    2

    2.1 Balance of trade and wealth of nation

    Mercantilism (unfashionable term no single school of

    thought) / pre-classical economic thought: characteristics;

    Wealth-getting no longer considered sinful

    Government (prince) the principal economic agent

    Commercial wars between nation states.

    Increases in nations wealth a zero sum game

    Colonialism; beginnings of slave trade. Beginnings of systematic analysis of economic issues.

    Initial discussions on nature of wealth of nation.

  • 7/29/2019 Econ1006 02 Roots 091006a No Blues

    3/32

    3

    What is wealth of nation? An initial answer:

    Bullionism: Wealth identified with gold/ precious metals.

    Zero sum game:

    England has no gold mines, so get gold from Spain;

    letters of marque, etc.

    An early estimate of Englands national income

    (Petty, early 1670s) includes 60,000 taken from

    the Spaniards.

  • 7/29/2019 Econ1006 02 Roots 091006a No Blues

    4/32

    4

    Wealth of nation: a more subtle definition.

    A more elaborate form of mercantilism developed beyond

    bullionism to identify wealth with trade surplus.

    Antonio Serra.A brief treatise on the causes which canmakegold and silver plentiful in kingdoms where there are

    no mines. 1613.

    Thomas Mun.Englands treasure by foreign trade. 1621

    [published 1664].

  • 7/29/2019 Econ1006 02 Roots 091006a No Blues

    5/32

    5

    The two columns balance by definition / accounting identity / assumption.

    Exports 22,000 Imports 20,000

    Balance / inward specie flow /

    kingdom enriched

    2,000

    BALANCE: 22,000 22,000

    Balance of trade.

    Precious metals (specie) were the means of international payment.

    balance established through speciemovements.

    e.g. Muns example:

  • 7/29/2019 Econ1006 02 Roots 091006a No Blues

    6/32

    6

    Trade surplus / favourable balance of trade (BOT).

    Todays definitions:

    Balance of Trade (BOT):

    goodsexports and imports (visibles) only.

    Balance of Payments (BOP):

    BOT + invisible exports and imports: services,

    freight, tourism, etc.

    + interest payments, capital movements,

    etc., etc.

    Either way, there is always by definitiona balance, through

    international payments.

  • 7/29/2019 Econ1006 02 Roots 091006a No Blues

    7/32

    7

    (1) Exports (3) Imports

    (2) merchant gains, etc.

    (= invisible exports)

    (4) Payments to foreigners for their

    merchant gains, etc.

    (= invisible imports)

    (5) Balance (movements of specie)

    1 + 2 3 + 4 + 5

    Trade surplus / favourable balance of trade (BOT).

    BOT / BOP distinction not yet made by Mun; in trade, he includes

    not only goods but also all aspects of merchants mark-up: insurance,

    freight, merchant gains, etc., i.e. invisibles.

    The two columns balance by definition / accounting identity / assumption:

    1 + 2 = 3 + 4 + 5

  • 7/29/2019 Econ1006 02 Roots 091006a No Blues

    8/32

    8

    (1) Exports (3) Imports

    (2) merchant gains (invisible

    exports)

    (4) invisible imports

    (5) Balance (movements of specie)

    1 + 2 3 + 4 + 5

    Trade surplus / favourable balance of trade (BOT), contd

    Policy conclusions:

    Bullionists: get gold from Spain, etc.; prevent gold exports. Ensure (5) > 0 and maximise!

    Mercantilists: OK to export gold in the course of expanding trade,

    e.g. buying goods for re-export.

    i.e. Maximise (1+ 2) - (3 + 4)

  • 7/29/2019 Econ1006 02 Roots 091006a No Blues

    9/32

    9

    Balance of Trade (BOT) / BOP.

    Examples of merchants mark-up (Mun):

    Exported from

    England to Italy

    Fetched from

    England by Italian

    merchants

    Shipped to Italy

    by Englands

    merchants

    Merchant's

    mark-up

    Corn,

    per quarter

    25s. 50s25s

    = 100%Red herrings,

    per barrel20s. 40s

    20s.

    = 100%

    Price in

    England

    Bought from

    the Dutch in

    Amsterdam

    Mark-upBought in

    East IndiesMark-up

    Pepper,

    per pound2s = [24d.] 20d.

    4d.

    [= 16.7%]3d.

    21d.

    [= 700%]

    Remote or far countries trade far more profitable, e.g.

    12d (penny, pence) = 1s. (shilling).20s. = 1.

  • 7/29/2019 Econ1006 02 Roots 091006a No Blues

    10/32

    P

    100

    75

    50

    25

    S

    D

    Supply, demand, competition: Muns example.

    25 50 75 100 Q

    S'

    may raise above fifty upon the

    hundred in the quantity vented

    twenty five in

    the hundred less

    in the price

    Theme: Note the

    international context of

    these beginnings of S &

    D analysis!

  • 7/29/2019 Econ1006 02 Roots 091006a No Blues

    11/32

    11

    2.2 The Quantity Theory of Money (QTM)

    Topical issue in early modern period: influx of precious metals from

    Americas in 16th century rise in prices.

    first clear statements of QTM, i.e. M P

    Problem for bullionists: this would mean price inflation, whereas,even for Mun, etc., more gold is in general good.

    But mercantilists argued that this inflationary pressure would be

    neutralised:

    Lack of M (i.e. gold, silver) is an obstacle to trade.

    Equivalently, more M quickens trade / drives trade, i.e.

    stimulates an increase in transactions (T).

  • 7/29/2019 Econ1006 02 Roots 091006a No Blues

    12/32

    12

    Quantity Theory of Money (QTM) in early modern period, contd

    Quickening / driving trade in terms of Fisher (1911) Equation of

    Exchange:

    Assume V = V, (as was normally assumed), we have:

    M.V = P.T so that P = M/T.V

    Gold / silver from Americas M1 > M0BUT this quickens trade T1 >T0

    If we assume that M and T increase proportionately, then:

    M1/T1 = M0/T0

    We thus have:

    P1 = M1/T1.V = M0/T0.V = P0

    i.e. Increase of precious metals does not necessarily lead to price

    inflation.

  • 7/29/2019 Econ1006 02 Roots 091006a No Blues

    13/32

    13

    Note / preview: Assumption that V is stable:

    A characteristic of classical economics.

    Preview: challenged by Keyneshoarding, Liquidity Trap, etc.

    Estimating V today: Not measured directly; just use Equation of Exchange:

    Data for P Price Index

    (Consumer Price Index, Retail Price Index, etc.)Data for M Money Supply (Preview: Problem: M0? M1?

    M4?, etc.)

    Data for T Transactions within a given year

    i.e. Y (National Income)

    M.V = P. Y V = P.Y / M

    We have data for P, Y and M we just read off what V must be.

    i.e. V given as an identity; not measured directly.

  • 7/29/2019 Econ1006 02 Roots 091006a No Blues

    14/32

    14

    Pettys suggestion that V could be measured DIRECTLY.

    Petty suggests that V could be measured directly if enough data were

    available on transactions payments.

    He assumes V depends on frequency of payments of income:

    Estimates annual expense as 40m and assumes this is equal to

    income.

    If all income payments were weekly, as normal for wage-earners,then V would need to be 52, so 40m/52, or less than 1m, would be

    needed to drive the trade of the nation.

    If all payments were quarterly, as rent and tax payments were, then

    40m/4 would be needed, i.e. 10m.

    Petty assumes a mixture of the two; crudely calculates:

    10m + 1m = 11m.

    Halve this, and we have 5 m, which will be enough to drive

    trade.

  • 7/29/2019 Econ1006 02 Roots 091006a No Blues

    15/32

    Efficiency in production

    Beginnings of transition:from mercantilism focus on trade

    to classicalfocus on production.

    Mun: artificial trade more profitable than natural.

    (Arts = manufactures, technology.)Benefits of large population /number of people.

    Particularly those in arts.

    Early 17th century: promotion oftechnological progress.

    Advancement of useful learning (Bacon).

    Agricultural technology, etc.

  • 7/29/2019 Econ1006 02 Roots 091006a No Blues

    16/32

    Efficiency in production, contd

    Topical issue: Holland: small country, but a leading commercial

    power.

    William Petty (1623-87) on the benefits of spatial compactness

    An early attempt at a theory of productivity.

    Focussed on fact that Holland was most dynamic European

    economy and most densely populated.

  • 7/29/2019 Econ1006 02 Roots 091006a No Blues

    17/32

    William Petty (1623-87) on the benefits of spatial compactness,

    contd

    Pettys argument: Spatial compactness of population (as in Holland)

    living compactly gives conditions for:

    Economies of scale.

    Though note: administration / social overheads rather thanproduction process itself.

    Technological progress.

    London the supreme example.

    Division of labour.

    Specialisation, etc.. (Nothing new in itselfancients too!)

  • 7/29/2019 Econ1006 02 Roots 091006a No Blues

    18/32

    William Petty (1623-87) on the benefits of spatial compactness,

    contd

    Pettys policy proposals to increase compactness:

    Multiply the people, i.e. encourage higher birth rate.

    Wealth of nation lies in high populationpopular idea at the

    time.

    Forced inward migration to England from Ireland

    (transplantation). Give England same advantages of population compactness

    as Holland.

  • 7/29/2019 Econ1006 02 Roots 091006a No Blues

    19/32

    19

    Today:

    Three measures:

    Expenditure

    Income

    Product (Output)Quoted figure (UK) is average of all three.

    Early modern anticipations: Mun had already urged an annual account of balance of trade.

    Petty: first suggested theoretical framework for National

    Income accounting.

    Expenditure

    Product

    Income

    2.4 Measuring national income

  • 7/29/2019 Econ1006 02 Roots 091006a No Blues

    20/32

    20

    National income: first attempt at theoretical framework: Petty, c. 1667.

    Expenditure m Income m

    Personal expenditure of6m persons at 6.67 per

    head 40

    Rent of land 8

    Yield on money and

    other personal estates 7

    The labour of the

    people 25

    TOTAL 40 40

    Note: Anticipates concept of factors of production:

    Land, Capital, Labour

    But Capital is weakly anticipated in Pettys Money and other

    personal estates: all kinds of things jumbled inhousing, shipping,

    livestock, precious metals, merchandise, furniture, etc.

  • 7/29/2019 Econ1006 02 Roots 091006a No Blues

    21/32

    21

    LEFT HAND COLUMN:

    EXPENDITURE

    MEASURE:

    Population:

    6m

    Expenditure per head:6. 13s. 4d. p.a.,

    or 4 d. per diem.

    Thus total expenditure is:6m x 6 2/3

    = 40m.

  • 7/29/2019 Econ1006 02 Roots 091006a No Blues

    22/32

    22

    RIGHT HAND COLUMN:

    INCOME MEASURE:

    Income of landowners, i.e. rent:

    8m p.a.

    The value of land is 18 years purchase, i.e.

    8m x 18 = 144m

    The rent therefore represents yield on land of

    8 / 144 = 5.5 %.

    Income on money and other personal estates

    Value is estimated at 106m (by adding up housing, shipping, livestock, etc.)

    So at same yield as rent, the income (interest, etc.) would be 5.5 % of 106m

    = 5.89m.

    But these earn more than rent, so suppose it to yield 7m

  • 7/29/2019 Econ1006 02 Roots 091006a No Blues

    23/32

    23

    RIGHT HAND COLUMN:

    INCOME MEASURE, contd.

    We now have:

    Income of landowners: 8m. Income on money, etc.: 7m

    i.e. These account for 15m of income.

    Total expenditure is 40m.

    So wages must account for the rest:

    i.e. 40m15m = 25m.

    i.e. Wages are estimated as the residual.

  • 7/29/2019 Econ1006 02 Roots 091006a No Blues

    24/32

    24

    Motivation for the calculation / Pettys political arithmetic:

    Pettys calculation (c. 1667) addressed monarchys need for war

    finance.

    (Second of three Anglo-Dutch wars, 1665-7.)

    This calculation indicated that a greater burden of tax could fall on

    wage-earners: 25 / 40 = 5/8, or 0.625.

    Method was largely excise, i.e. indirect taxation: beer and other

    goods consumed by labouring class.

    Less sensible to labourers than direct taxes.

    Remained a popular idea; avoid tax revolts.

    Note: Illustrated end of egalitarian ideals of Civil War period.

  • 7/29/2019 Econ1006 02 Roots 091006a No Blues

    25/32

    25

    The value of the people.

    Yield on Land + Money, etc. = 8 + 7 = 15mValue of = 144 + 106 = 250m

    So Yield is 15 / 250 = 6%

    Or equivalently:

    Value is 250 / 25 (= 16 2/3) times the annual yield.

    Yield on people is 25m.

    So value of the people must be 16 2/3 times 25m.

    = 417m

    There are 6m people, so their value is 417m / 6m

    = 69 each.

    Th l f th l d

  • 7/29/2019 Econ1006 02 Roots 091006a No Blues

    26/32

    26

    The value of the people, contd

    Petty explicitly associates this concept with slave prices.

    Various estimates in Pettys writings:

    African slave: 25 for adult, 5 for child.

    He also estimates:

    The value of the Slaves, brought out of Africa, to serve in our

    American Plantations, Twenty thousand pounds (c. 1673).

    i.e. 20,000 / 25 = 800 adults?

    Value of French and Irish: worth less than English.But note: value of Irish can increase with residence in England:

    Through prolonged residence in England / intermarriage

    with English, Irish can be transmuted into English.

    Value will increase from 7 to 10, i.e. 42%.

  • 7/29/2019 Econ1006 02 Roots 091006a No Blues

    27/32

    27

    Pettys Bank for war:

    there being 3 Years of Peace in these Nations for one of Warr, the said

    3 Years Overplus will be 3324 Thousand Pounds; which, added to 2676

    Thousand Pounds, will make a Bank of 6 Millions Pounds for the oneYear of War.

    Kings

    revenue

    Peacetime

    expenditure

    Revenue net of

    peacetime

    expenditure

    Cumulative fund /

    bank for war

    Year 1 2.676m 1.568m 1.108m 1.108m

    Year 2 2.216m

    Year 3 3.324m

    i.e. in Year 3, total revenue of King:

    2.676m + 3.324m = 6m

    Enough to fight a war.

  • 7/29/2019 Econ1006 02 Roots 091006a No Blues

    28/32

    Characteristics of early modern economic thought

    State still the principal economic agent.

    War aims / raising finance for war still dominant concern

    fiscal-military:

    90% state revenue was for war.

    Economic issues not yet a distinct field of inquiry, let alone

    a discipline.

    Not differentiated from political, geographical, religious

    issues, etc.

  • 7/29/2019 Econ1006 02 Roots 091006a No Blues

    29/32

    Characteristics of early modern economic thought, contd

    Pettys policy proposal illustrates all these characteristics:

    State policies to multiply the people.

    State action / forced inward migration to England from

    Ireland (transplantation).

    Give England same advantages of population

    compactness as Holland.

    Aim: Bank for war from 2m extra annual state revenue.

    His compactness concept was spatial /geographical,

    concerned government and administration as well as

    economic ends; would also solve religious and political

    issuesend Irish rebellions, etc.

  • 7/29/2019 Econ1006 02 Roots 091006a No Blues

    30/32

    Main themes:

    Overseas / open economy: Beginnings of economic discussions concern surplus and

    deficit internationally.

    Same for early QTM and Supply and Demand analysis.

    Colonialism, beginnings of slave trade, etc.

    War finance dominant in fiscal debates.

    Crisis:

    Trade crisis with Holland in 1620s.

    Civil wars in England.

    War generally: kind of cycle!

  • 7/29/2019 Econ1006 02 Roots 091006a No Blues

    31/32

    Transition / forward pointers:

    Division of society into three great classes, each with own

    source of revenue.

    Labour produces a surplus, which is distributed as rent and

    yield on money, etc..

    Beginnings of wider theories of production / output /

    efficiency rather than just trade; i.e. away from

    mercantilism and transition towards classical tradition.

    Quantitative calculations and quantitative mode ofexpression; Pettys political arithmetic.

    Economic not yet separated from other spheres of

    discussion.

    2 ROOTS OF ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

  • 7/29/2019 Econ1006 02 Roots 091006a No Blues

    32/32

    2. ROOTS OF ECONOMIC ANALYSISsummary.

    2.1 Balance of trade and wealth of nation

    From bullionism to Mun, etc. Importance of overseas trade.

    Beginnings of Supply and Demand analysis.

    2.2 The Quantity Theory of Money

    Arguments against and for bullionism. Velocity of circulation and its

    measurement.

    2.3 Efficiency in production

    Beginnings of transition from mercantilism to classical tradition.

    Example: Petty, Holland, and spatial compactness.

    2.4 National income

    First attempt at calculation. Labour income as residual. Indirect

    taxation Fiscal military motivation