ecole polytechnique fédérale de lausanne · ecole polytechnique fédérale de lausanne laboratory...
TRANSCRIPT
NSLS-II Workshop
March 15, 2004
László Forró
School of Basic Sciences
Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Laboratory of Nanostructures and Novel Electronic Materials
00 0.2
hole per CuO2
Tempe
ratu
re
anti
ferr
omag
neti
c
superconducting
T*
Non-Fermi liquid
Fermi liquid
Phase diagram
Pseudo-gap
Optimallydoped
underdoped overdoped
∆? Goal: to study the superconducting gap
How can we study ∆ (at NSLS)?• Electron in - electron out
– EELS : SC → vacuum keV– Tunnelling : SC → metal meV
• Photon in - electron out– Photoemission eV
• Electron in - photon out– Inverse Photoemission
• Photon in - photon out– Optical reflectivity– Optical transmission meV– Raman scattering
• 300K = 25 meV = 200cm-1 = 6 THz• Low Tc : 3.5x3K = 100 GHz µwave• High Tc : 3.5x100K = 230cm-1 FIR
Our choice
Low Tc 1/τ ≈ 1013 Hz, 2∆ ≈1010 Hz
ω
σ1 σ21/ω
2∆ ω
2∆2∆ω ω
1.r
t
σdc
Total brightness
Total darkness
In transmission it is « easier » !!
refl
ecti
vity
tran
smis
sion
1
0
2212 100 nm thick single crystal, self-supported over 0.9 mm hole, platinum substrate
Our method:transparent single crystals of Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8
2212 150 nm thick single cystal, self-supported over 0.6 mm hole, contacted for resistivity, sapphire substrate
The first « good » results (from U4IR)
No peak in transmission ratios -> gaplesssuperconductivity!
Forró et al., PRL, 65, 1941 (1990)
Counter-argument for the absence ofthe gap feature: Clean limit
2∆
T>Tc
1/τ
σ1
ω (cm-1)Very small oscillatory strength → Difficult to observe
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
0 200 400 600 800
ρ ab (m
Ωcm
)
T (K)
Bi2Sr
2Ca
1-xY
xCu
2O
8
p=0.16
0.12
0.096
0.08
0.058
T*
0 100
1 102
2 102
3 102
4 102
5 102
6 102
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
R (Ω
)
T (K)
p = 1bar
0.1
0.01
0.001
Bi2Sr
2CaCu
2O
8+δ
Leaving the « clean limit » by introducingdefects: by electron irradiation, off-stoichiometry, substitution
e.g.: by Oxygen depletion
Infrared transmission of 2212 up to high temperatures (500 °C) (U4IR)
Thermocouple
Gold coated sapphire holder
heater
electrodes
Reference hole φ =0.6 mm2212 sample
Leaving « clean limit »:e-beam induced defects, heattreatment, substitution – still no gap feature!
Mandrus et ak, 70, 2629 (1993)
Cuprates are unconventional, d-wave superconductors!
Pressure dependence
L. Forró, R. Gaál, H. Berger, P. Fazekas, K. Penc, I. Kézsmárki and G. MihályPhys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1938 (2000).
Phase diagram
Optical conductivity in the infrared rangeambient pressure under pressure
C. Homes, et al. – NSLS U10A beamline (2001-2002)
∆ = 700 K
100 10000
100
200
300
400
500
600
700 p TMI ∆
18 kbar 17 K 260 K 16 kbar 26 K 320 K 15.7 kbar 27 K 390 K 14.6 kbar 31 K 410 K 1 bar 70 K 750 K
σ 1 (Ω
-1cm
-1)
ω (cm-1)
10 K
HP optical cell
Blue bronzePeierls transition at 180 K
Quasi-1D organic CDW conductors2H-NbSe2: a conventionallayered superconductor
Other correlated systems studied (U4IR)
Hernadi et al., Catalysis Lett. 59, 229 (1997)
Supporter (Alumina, Zeolite)
Catalyticparticles(Fe, Co, Ni…)
Single walled CNTs Multi walled CNTs
Structured Nanotube Filmsby Soft Lithography
1 mM 10 mM
40 mM 50 mM
Kind et al., Langmuir (2000)
Patterned CNT structures
Flat panel screen
ZnO phosphor(anode)
Mo gate (for pixel control)Nanotube emitters
Back contact
to emitters
(cathode)
Substarte
Glass
Samsung:
4.5" color screen
Choi et al., APL 75, 3129 (1999)
•Good metallic behavior for E||
Drude fit for E||:ε0 4.71
ωp 7300
γ 1200
•Large anisotropy
R. Gaál et al., in preparation
Parallel olarization
Perpendicular polarization
300 K
Experiment on SWNT ropes
• Insulates like diamond (Broun et al., Nature’98)
• Semiconducts (Porath et al., Nature’2000); Tran et al., Phys.Rev.Lett.’2000).
• Conducts like a metal (Fink et al., Nature’99).
• Superconducts (proximity effect) (Kasumov et al. Science’2001).
Charge Transport in DNA
Aligned bundle of λ-DNA
Self-supportedoriented DNA bundle,
~10µm width
Light polarized ||and ⊥ to the bundle
Coppergrid
0100 200 3000
Wavenumber (cm-1)
100
Tra
nsm
ittan
ce (%
)
400
A broad, localised
mode
No conduction in d.c. limit
the low energy part… (on U12IR)
L. Forró et al., in preparation
Results… (on U10B)
2000 4000 6000500Wavenumber (cm-1)
0
100
Tra
nsm
ittan
ce (%
)
Parallel polarization
Perpendicular polarization
Phonon structure of a protein: their variationcan be used for diagnostic purposes
0
0.2
0.4
Wavenumber (cm-1)4000 2000
Inte
nsit
y
N-H stretch in proteins C-H
stretch in lipids
C=O stretch
in α-helix
PO2stretch
Alzheimer’s plaques are misfol -ded β-amyloid protein.
Alzheimer’s tangles are hyper-phosphorylated tau protein the forms paired helical filaments.
Plaques and tangles are thought to damage surrounding neurons.
Plaques-like structures, by staining, have recently been identified in other organs: liver, pancreas, ovary, testis, thyroid.
Amyloid plaques
Neurofibrillary tangles
20 µm
20 µm
Normal Alzheimer’sAlzheimer’s disease
1800 1500 1300
Wavenumber (cm-1)
Inte
nsit
y(u
.a.)
AD brain byopsis
α-helix
β-sheet Humain cortexhealthy
Alzheimer’s disease
Conformation change of a protein
Cortex AD plaques
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
y p
ositi
on [µ
m]
150100500 x position [µm]
0.80
0.75
0.70
0.65
intensity a.u.
Acknowledgments…G. Williams H. BergerLarry Carr R. Gaal
Lisa Miller A. Radenovic
Laszlo Mihaly A. Kis
C. Homes
D. Mandrus J. Miklossy
M. Martin S. Kasas
I. Kezsmarki
G. Mihaly
N. Barisic