early intervention to prevent gang involvement and youth ... · early intervention to prevent gang...

16
Early intervenon to prevent gang involvement and youth violence A PRACTICAL GUIDE STEPHANIE WADDELL JONATHON TOY

Upload: phamtu

Post on 29-Apr-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Early intervention to prevent gang involvement and youth violence

A PRACTICAL GUIDE

STEPHANIE WADDELL JONATHON TOY

This guidance has been produced in collaboration with the Home Office. © Early Intervention Foundation 2015. We encourage the wide use of this document. However you may not use this work for commercial purposes; nor alter, transform, or build upon this work except with our express written permission.

The Early Intervention Foundation’s (EIF) aim is to shift spending, action and support for children and families from Late to Early Intervention, from picking up the pieces to giving everyone the best start in life. We want to see a pre-emptive approach which focuses on addressing the root causes of problems before they become entrenched. Not only can this shift in attitude and spending improve outcomes for the next generation and their families, it has the potential to reap significant financial savings. As a What Works Centre, sitting alongside the Col-lege of Policing What Works Centre for Crime Reduction, we use evidence to inform policy and practice with the goal of driving improvements to children’s outcomes and breaking inter-generational patterns of disadvantage and dysfunction. We are delighted to have worked with the Home Office to produce this practical guide to early intervention. One of the key priorities of the Home Office’s Ending Gang Violence and Exploita-tion programme is to ‘Promote early intervention - using evidence from the Early Intervention Foundation to identify and support vulnerable children and young people’. The Home Office wants to intervene early to stop young people from becoming involved in gang and youth vio-lence in the first place. This guide draws on EIF’s work to look at the risk indicators for gang involvement and youth violence, and to look at the key features of programmes shown to be effective in preventing these or related outcomes. It also draws on wider but highly relevant EIF reports, including our review of social and emotional skills development. We hope that you find this guide useful and we look forward to continuing to support the Ending Gang Violence and Exploitation programme. Carey Oppenheim Chief Executive, Early Intervention Foundation

This Guide draws together the conclusions of work completed by the Early Intervention Foundation to look at what’s known about effec-tive approaches to the prevention of gang in-volvement, gang-related exploitation and youth violence. It also draws upon other resources and on the experiences of those working with vulner-able young people to provide practical advice, case studies and links to further resources.

1. Intervening early to prevent gang-related violence and exploitation

2. Identifying vulnerable children and young people

We’d welcome your feedback

This is a live Guide. We’ll be adding to it and refining it over time. We’d welcome your thoughts

about how helpful it is, what things we’ve missed, and what areas we could strengthen. We’d

also love to hear about interesting or innovative practice in your area, which we can add to the

case studies, or about your experiences of working with individual children, young people or fam-

ilies. Lastly, we’d be very interested to hear about any problems or barriers you’re facing in trying

to implement early intervention locally.

If you have any comments on the content of this Guide, please send them to

[email protected]

Early intervention to prevent gang involvement and youth violence

FILM CLIPS

3. Providing the right support: what we know about what works

4. Partnership working

5. Core components of early intervention programmes for gang and youth violence

Professor Mark Bellis, Public Health Wales

explaining why violence should be treated

as a public health issue, and how early

intervention can prevent problems later

on.

Karyn McCluskey, Scottish Violence

Reduction Unit, speaking at the Home

Office International Crime and Policing

Conference 2015.

6. EIF Maturity Matrix: assessing progress

£5.2bn Estimated annual cost of Late Intervention to deal with crime and antisocial behaviour. For more on the fiscal costs of Late Intervention, click here.

“Prevention is always better than cure, and that’s

why we have a moral mission to provide

compassionate support as soon as problems

emerge...”

Secretary of State for Education, speaking at EIF

National Conference in February 2015

The importance of early intervention to prevent gang violence

and exploitation

WHAT IS EARLY INTERVENTION?

Early intervention involves taking action as soon as possible in response to signals of risks to children’s development and outcomes. Its purpose is to re-duce the likelihood of poor long-term outcomes for children and their families in a cost-effective way.

Early intervention starts once problems or risks have begun to develop but before they get too seri-ous. It requires good assessment to identify the un-derlying causes and a comprehensive and purposeful response.

In the context of gang involvement and youth vio-lence, including gang–related exploitation, early intervention involves identifying individuals, fami-lies and communities that may be at risk of running into difficulties and providing timely and effective support. This might include identification of young people’s involvement with negative peer groups.

ADVERSE CHILDHOOD EXPERIENCES (ACE)

ACE refers to the sources of stress that children may suffer early in life. These include abuse, neglect, violence between parents or caregivers, alcohol and substance misuse, and peer or community violence.

Considerable and prolonged stress in childhood has lifelong consequences. It can increase the like-lihood of involvement in violence and a range of other problems.

Early intervention programmes such as parenting support can enable parents to provide safe, nurtur-ing environments for their children.

CONDUCT PROBLEMS

There is a strong association between conduct problems in childhood and later involvement in crime, including violent crime.

Parenting support, aimed at improving the quality of the parent-child relationship, can significantly improve a child’s behaviour.

To find out more, please click here.

KEY MESSAGES

Strong predictors of later involvement in gangs or youth violence can be identified in children as young as seven. The earlier these indicators are identified, the greater the chance of working positively with the child to increase protective factors, build resilience and significantly improve life chances.

Any risk assessment tool needs to be based on an understanding of the strongest predictors of risk. Its purpose needs to be clear.

Risk assessment tools can be helpful, but cannot compensate for skilled professional judgement.

SIGNALS OF RISK

The EIF report “Preventing Gang and Youth Violence: A review of risk and protective factors” (authored by Cordis Bright Consulting) uses the findings of longitudinal studies to identi-fy the strongest indicators of risk of involvement in gang or youth violence. The report groups indicators under five domains:

Examples of strong predictors of later involvement in youth violence or gangs include:

Substance use (age 7-9) Aggressive behaviour (age 7-9) Low self esteem (age 13-15) Low academic achievement (primary school) Delinquent peers (ages 7-15)

To read the full report, please click here.

Identifying vulnerable children and young people

Identifying signals of risk

Practitioners should consider the following when designing tools to identify risk in young people: The purpose of any risk assessment tool needs

to be clear. For example, is it to identify a group of young people who could benefit from a tar-geted intervention?

Any tool should be constructed around the most

predictive indicators of risk and protective fac-tors. It may be helpful to use scoring and weighting mechanisms.

It’s important to consider the level of expertise

needed to complete a risk assessment. Some risks are not simple to identify and require par-ticular skills or knowledge.

The usability of any risk tool must be consid-

ered. Whilst it’s desirable to have a comprehen-sive tool, this needs to be balanced with the time available to complete the assessment.

It’s important to differentiate between behav-

ioural risk indicators such as truancy and previ-ous offending, and explanatory factors such as low empathy.

Behavioural indicators are very useful for

identifying who to work with and will provide higher levels of predictive power but will not necessarily provide information about how best to work with a young person.

The EIF Guidebook is an online resource for those who wish to find out more about how to commis-sion and deliver effective early intervention. It will evolve and we will add more programmes as we do new reviews as to ‘what works’ for differ-ent outcomes for children. The Guidebook enables you to search for programmes by key outcomes, including crime, violence and antisocial behaviour. We have in-cluded a brief section on how to use Guidebook ratings at Appendix 1. It also includes advice on effective commission-ing, including ways to compare costs, benefits and value for money. You can also find infor-mation about the evidence base behind different programmes and approaches at the links below:

The What Works Centre for Crime Reduction Toolkit

Project Oracle: children and youth evidence hub for London.

The Knowledge Hub - Gang and Youth Violence Special Interest Group

Providing the right support: what works?

Click here for CASE STUDIES

GANG AND YOUTH VIOLENCE

EIF’s Rapid Review of What Works to Prevent Gang Involvement, Youth Violence and Youth Crime provides commissioners with guidance about the kinds of programmes which have been shown to work and identifies the following key features of effective programmes:

KEY MESSAGES

There are many ‘gangs prevention’ programmes running across the country. The evidence-base for these is not strong in the UK, so in the majority of cases we do not know if these programmes are effec-tive, ineffective, or potentially harmful.

Commissioners should satisfy themselves that evaluation plans are in place and that they are able to assess the impact and value for money of the programmes they commission.

Commissioning decisions should be based on an awareness the current evidence base, and the key principles of effective and ineffective practice outlined in our report.

To access EIF’s report including

advice on commissioning mentor-

ing programmes, click here.

Seeking to create positive change in young

people’s lives, giving them the skills to make

healthy and positive choices, as well as aiming

to prevent negative outcomes.

Schools-based or family-focused, involving skills

practice, parent training or therapy.

Skilled, trained facilitators, often working with

children or young people as part of their

professional role.

Implementation fidelity: sticking to the original

programme specification and ensuring good

implementation quality.

The EIF Evidence Standards

Evidence rating as it appears on the Guide-

book & website

Classification in future re-ports

4 Evidence-based

3 Evidence-based

2 Preliminary

1

No evidence yet at Level 2

0 No evidence yet at Level 2

-

Found not to be effective in at least one rigorously conducted

study

The Early Intervention Foundation recognises the importance of supporting local areas in develop-ing effective, evidence-based early intervention programmes. The EIF publication “What works to prevent gang involvement, youth violence and crime” highlighted that whilst the evidence base is still limited, partnership programmes that are most likely to be effective

seek to create positive changes and prevent negative outcomes,

work with clients in their natural environ-ment and

are delivered by trained facilitators, acting in their professional capacity.

Such an approach requires well co-ordinated partnership working and a shared specification.

Advice in this section is drawn from our experi-ence of working with local areas and our expert knowledge of early help.

Partnership working

“Preventing youth violence requires a

comprehensive approach that addresses

social determinants of violence, such as

income inequality, rapid demographic

and social change and low levels of social

protection” (WHO –Preventing Youth

Violence 2015)

INTEGRATED APPROACHES We know that several local areas are integrating their work to prevent gang involvement with wider work to support children, young people and families. These approaches often involve some degree of co-location with partners, and require strong information sharing processes. EIF will be looking at the effectiveness of some of these ways of working as part of a wider project to look at integrated early help systems.

Things to think about

It is often effective to consider strategic align-ment of priorities, resources and operational in-tegration. Therefore you may want to consider the specific questions below: Is your plan to prevent gang-related violence

and exploitation based on a full understanding of the needs of children and young people at greater risk?

Are these needs identified in your Joint

Strategic Needs Assessment? Is your plan fully integrated into wider early

help or intervention strategies and consistent with other partnership strategies including the Health and Wellbeing Strategy?

Are your success measures aligned to wider,

shared partnership goals around improving children’s lives?

Are there opportunities to pool resources for

early intervention to prevent gang-related vio-lence and exploitation alongside other negative outcomes for children and young people?

Are there clear, aligned processes for

identifying, assessing and providing appropriate help to children, young people and families at risk of gang involvement, and are these understood and agreed by all relevant partners?

For practical advice from the

Information Sharing Centre of

Excellence, please click here.

Lesson 1 - Intelligent information Information gathered from front line practi-tioners providing a full understanding of the needs of the local community, or through detailed case history knowledge related to the person, group or family. The information should include an appropriate risk assess-ment tool, using the risk and protective fac-tors highlighted above.

Lessons for effective Early Intervention systems

Incredible Years BASIC Pre-School Pro-

gramme - for parents with serious concerns

about the behaviour of a child between the

ages of three and six. Parents attend weekly

group sessions but practitioners visit the par-

ents in their homes prior to the start of the

programme and then keep in touch with the

parents individually through weekly phone

calls.

Evidence - Rated 4 (highest score) in the EIF

Guidebook. Assessed by NREPP, RAND and

others. See Appendix 1 for a guide to using

and interpreting Guidebook ratings.

Well-evidenced programmes including this component

Lesson 2 - Clearly defined focus, objec-tives and Theory of Change Effective early intervention programmes tend to have clearly specified objectives and recipient groups and a theory of change which has a basis in evidence or science. Generic and universal pro-grammes seeking to achieve multiple out-comes for diverse groups do not tend to work.

Multidimentional Treatment Foster Care -

Adolescent (also known as Treatment Fos-

ter Care Oregon) - For families with a child

aged 10-17 who is at risk of placement in

foster care because of delinquent behav-

iour. Children are placed with a ‘treatment

foster family’ trained in the MTFC-A model,

which can help to fix maladaptive parent/

child interactions .

Evidence - Rated 4 (highest score) in the EIF

Guidebook. Assessed by the Commissioning

Toolkit and CEBC.

The Early Intervention Foundation publication “What works to prevent gang involvement, youth violence and crime”, has identified a num-ber of lessons to be learned for building effective systems of early intervention to prevent these issues. These components should not be considered as an exhaustive list but provides a framework for commissioners in designing early intervention programmes. The evidence ratings included come from the EIF Guidebook, and a guide for interpreting and using these ratings is included at Appendix 1.

Multisystemic Therapy for Problem Sexual

Behaviour - for families with a young person

who has demonstrated sexually abusive be-

haviour. Therapists deliver individually to

families in their homes, working closely with

the family to understand the risks and devel-

op a plan.

Evidence - Rated 4 (highest score) in the EIF

Guidebook. Assessed by OJP and others.

Well-evidenced programmes including this component

Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioural Therapy - therapeutic intervention for children and families who have been exposed to a traumatic event. Based on the theory that children have difficulty processing complex emotions that re-sult from traumatic events.

Evidence - Rated 4 (highest score) in the

EIF Guidebook. Assessed by OJP, NREPP

and CEBC.

Lesson 3 - Highly skilled facilitators - who

have a high level of training in their profes-

sional field and have been trained to under-

stand the risk and protective factors related

to gang and youth violence. These might be

teachers, youth workers, health practitioners

or highly skilled mentors providing 1-1 sup-

port.

Lessons for effective Early Intervention systems

Multisystemic Therapy (MST) - for fami-

lies of young people who have exhibited

serious antisocial behaviour. Specially

trained MST therapists provide them with

therapy to improve the young person’s

behaviour.

Evidence - Rated 4 (highest score) in the

EIF Guidebook. Assessed by OJP, RAND

and others.

Well-evidenced programmes including this component

Lesson 4 - Clear referral pathway

A key element for any successful early in-

tervention programme is the ability to have

a clear referral pathway for any client who

is identified as needing more specialist sup-

port, or for front line facilitators who re-

quire additional guidance.

Multidimensional Family Therapy (MFT) -

for families with an adolescent with behav-

iour or substance misuse problems. Fami-

lies work with an MDFT therapist to devel-

op problem-solving skills for dealing with

multidimensional issues. Referral is struc-

tured, coming from the health system, the

justice system, schools, or social services.

Evidence - Rated 4 (highest score) in the EIF

Guidebook. Assessed by OJP, CEBC and

others.

Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioural Therapy - therapeutic intervention for chil-dren and families who have been exposed to a traumatic event. Based on the theory that children have difficulty processing com-plex emotions that result from traumatic events.

Evidence - Rated 4 (highest score) in the EIF

Guidebook. Assessed by OJP, NREPP and

CEBC.

Well-evidenced programmes including this component

Stepping Stones Triple P - for parents of

children (aged up to 12 years) diagnosed

with a serious physical or learning disability,

such as Down’s Syndrome or Autistic Spec-

trum Disorder. Parents are typically referred

into the programme through professionals.

Parents receive a screening call to make sure

that their level of need is appropriate for the

intensity of the programme.

Evidence - Rated 4 (highest score) in the EIF

Guidebook. Assessed by the Commissioning

Toolkit.

Lesson 5 - Regular and frequent contact

Many successful programmes benefit from

structured and regular contact, for example

weekly and over a number of weeks.

Lessons for effective Early Intervention systems

Functional Family Therapy - successful

with young people and their families. Pro-

gramme provides 8-30 week sessions,

structured around 5 phases - engagement

in change, motivation to change, relation-

ship assessment and change planning,

behavioural change, generalisation.

Evidence - Rated 4 (highest score) in the

EIF Guidebook. Assessed by OJP, CEBC

and others.

Well-evidenced programmes including this component

Lesson 6- Continuous review

All of the programmes that demonstrated

degrees of success have built in a continu-

ous review process. These reviews are not

limited to the success and challenges of

the programme. They include staff reviews

or clinically based reviews, and in some

cases have included client feedback .

Incredible Years BASIC Pre-School Pro-

gramme - for parents with serious concerns

about the behaviour of a child between the

ages of three and six. Review is provided by

supervisors from the host agency and feed-

back from practitioners and parents.

Evidence - Rated 4 (highest score) in the EIF

Guidebook. Assessed by NREPP, RAND and

others.

Well-evidenced programmes including this component

Multisystemic Therapy (MST) - for families of young people who have exhibited serious antisocial behaviour. MST therapists provide them with therapy to improve the young per-son’s behaviour. Review is through weekly conversations with the trainer assigned to the programme, onsite clinical supervision and Bi-Annual implementation reviews.

Evidence - Rated 4 (highest score) in the EIF

Guidebook. Assessed by OJP, RAND and

others.

Botvin LifeSkills Training (LST) - school-

based substance misuse prevention pro-

gramme designed to help young people

(aged eight to 18) avoid tobacco, alcohol, and

drug abuse. The programme consists of struc-

tured and regular contact both in its intensive

version (2 – 3 sessions per week) and its ex-

tended version (one session per week)

Evidence - Rated 4 (highest score) in the EIF

Guidebook. Assessed by OJP, Blueprints and

others.

Early intervention to prevent gang-related violence and exploitation -

sources of evidence-based or promising practice

The following table sets out a number of repositories which include early intervention programmes to prevent gang and youth violence. In some cases the programmes have been evaluated and have a clear evidence base of success. In others, the programmes should be considered as promising practice but may not have been ro-bustly evaluated. Interventions which have been shown to work in one location and with one population may not work in a different context and not all programmes successfully translate from one area to another. There-fore, practitioners should use these links as a guide and consider each programme both in terms of the local context and against the core components set out above.

KEY INFORMATION SOURCES

(Correct at time of publication)

Source Information link

Ending Gang

Violence and

Exploitation

Knowledge Hub

Online Knowledge Hub network which any professional working to tackle gang-related

violence and exploitation can join to connect, share good practice, and access useful in-

formation and tools. Members of the online network include voluntary and community

organisations, local authority leads, safeguarding and community safety, police, proba-

tion, youth workers and government policy advisors.

www.khub.net

Youth Justice Ministry of Justice website providing a catalogue of programmes including early interven-

tion programmes, especially related to gang involvement and weapons.

www.Justice.gov.uk

Project Oracle Repository of evidence-based programmes with an assessed theory of change. Accredita-

tion standards 1-5 where 1 is good evidence. Includes youth-based and early intervention

models.

www.project-

oracle.com

Foundation

Years

Provides a valuable knowledge hub of evidence-based programmes and case studies re-

lated to child development and early intervention for children and families. The website

focuses on early years from birth to 16 years old.

www.foundationyea

r.org.uk

Information

Sharing Centre

of Excellence

Hosted by Leicestershire County Council, the centre supports local areas in identifying

the barriers to the flow of information in their partnerships. The website provide case

studies on partnerships that it works with. This includes gang and youth violence pro-

grammes, such as the Margate Task Force.

www.Informationsh

aring.org.uk

Early Interven-

tion Foundation

A registered charity and one of the government’s “What Works” centres, reviewing evi-

dence and supporting early interventions activity in local areas, as well as conducting

evaluation and policy analysis.

www.eif.org.uk

World Health

Organisation

Provides a wealth of international research on violence, including research on youth vio-

lence, as well as examples of early intervention and prevention programmes.

www.who.int

Youth.gov A US programme directory of evidence-based programmes to prevent young crime and

problem behaviour.

www.youth.gov

College of Polic-

ing

Provides a number of publications and research studies on what works in terms of polic-

ing, partnership and crime prevention.

www.college.police.

uk

Useful sources of research in early intervention programmes

Manchester Metropolitan University

www.mmu2.ac.uk

There are a number of universities that have undertaken evidence-based research into early intervention to address youth violence and gang involvement. The information be-low provides a useful (though not exhaustive) link to recent research.

Research into the effectiveness of crime and dis-

order reduction partnerships, crime and eco-

nomics, mentoring siblings of gang members.

UCL Jill Dando Institute of Security and

Crime Science

www.ucl.ac.uk

Middlesex University

www.mdx.ac.uk

Bedfordshire University

www.beds.ac.uk

University of Central Lancashire

www.uclan.ac.uk

Liverpool Centre for Advance Policing

Studies - Liverpool John Moores University

www.LJMU.ac.uk

Kent Univerity

www.kent.ac.uk

Cardiff University

www.cardiff.ac.uk

Research into place-based policing and evalua-

tion of evidence-based interventions.

Research into gang violence and the socio-

economic links to gang involvement.

Research into problem-solving interventions and

their effectiveness. World renowned crime sci-

ence research including forensics

Research on evidence-based policing , domestic

violence and sexual offenders, gun crime culture

in Preston, assessing risk and aiding prevention.

Research into the impact of neglect on child de-

velopment and the impact of behavioural chal-

lenges including violence.

Research into exploitation of women and girls in

gangs.

Research into the health impacts of alcohol,

alcohol-related violence, and the night time

economy.

Any approach to intervening early to prevent involvement in gang-related violence and exploitation needs to be integrated with a place’s broader approach to early intervention. Different places are at different stages of the journey of implementing early intervention fully. The full EIF maturity matrix sets out the journey that a local area might go on as it works towards this. It is designed to help places identify what they are doing well and what needs further development, to make sure that vulnerable children and families get the support they need, when they need it. The Early Intervention to Prevent Gang and Youth Violence Maturity Matrix draws on this full tool to set out some of the questions that those leading work locally to tackle gang involvement and youth violence may want to ask of themselves and their wider partners. It offers a way in which local areas might assess their own progress towards a fully integrated approach to preventing gang and youth violence through early intervention. The tables at the end of the matrix are for you to consider and note your evidence for your self-assessed level of progress. We will be developing this tool further as we learn more about what works from evidence and evaluation, and from places that are delivering early intervention in practice.

EIF Maturity Matrix: Assessing Progress

Click here to access the Early Intervention to Prevent Gang and Youth

Violence Maturity Matrix

Appendix 1 - Using EIF Guidebook ratings

How the assessment was made, and caveats In 2014 EIF created an online library of programmes that provides an accessible overview of the evidence on 50 programmes chosen from 15 authoritative Clearinghouses. We did not revalidate the ratings of these clearinghouses (for more details please see our blog). We merely presented this evidence within a single framework of standards of evidence as a first step in our work as a What Works centre. This rating will reflect what these clearinghouses have to say about the strength and findings of the preponderance of the international evidence for a given programme over time. These ratings are not the product of an exhaustive and complete process; the clearinghouses themselves may not include and reflect the most recently conducted and published studies, given that these ratings are not continuously updated.

How to use the evidence rating The majority of programmes in the Guidebook have some evidence of being effective. However, we do not validate them in the sense of suggesting that they will inevitably work, because that would be an over statement of what the evidence can tell us. The assessment of the evidence can inform certain parts of a commissioning decision, but not every aspect – including consideration of costs and benefits and local implementability. Please see here for more detail.

Contact us E [email protected]

T +44 (0)20 3542 2481

@TheEIFoundation