eap draft investment plan 20180413 v3jlb - wordpress.com · 2018. 4. 17. · •develop logistics...
TRANSCRIPT
DRAFTDRAFTDRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFTEastern Partnership
Transport Investment Plan Brussels, April 17, 2018
DRAFTDRAFTDRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
Substantial investment by IFIs already made on the core TEN-T network in EaP region
Some countries are nearing completion of their networks (Azerbaijan and Georgia) but others will need long-term investment plans
To expedite the completion of the TEN-T core network the EC has requested an investment framework with priority activities to 2020 and 2030
The purpose of the exercise is to align around a common set of priorities but also to resource high quality preparation to improve readiness for implementation
Investment priorities will also include facilities to improve the performance of the network including border crossings, multi-modal facilities and road safety
Background
DRAFTDRAFTDRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
The EaP core network consists of about 13,600 km of road, 13,200 km of rail, 12 airports and 13 ports
About 240 projects with an estimated value of Euro 47 billion have been reviewed to provide section specific information on cost estimates, traffic and condition etc.
Government and IFI financial data on sector expenditures, current commitments and forecast capital investment budgets have been collected
Projects have also been assessed according to their strategic relevance, policy criteria and readiness
Prioritization
Multimodal transport model updated to evaluate the network level priorities and to assess project level viability
The team has visited each country to discuss investment priorities in October/November, 2017 and followed up with our country office staff on key questions. This is the first full consultation on the main findings.
DRAFTDRAFTDRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
Prioritization Process
• Linear projects are assessed using an updated multi-modal transport model to verify the economic viability of network priorities at a strategic level for EaP countries
Project assessments
• Preparation of draft priority list: Combines both quick wins and long-term projects that fit in the funding envelope
Project identification
• Previously identified projects are assessed in light of information provided by IFIs and the relevant national authorities
• Project-level proposals are checked for strategic fit, based on network priorities, covering the proposals’ economic, financial, social and environmental aspects.
• Preparation of funding envelops for the period 2018-2030: Includes potential sources of funding and an assessment of implementation capacity
Funding analysis
• Potential priorities not identified by the countries but emerging from the transport model
DRAFTDRAFTDRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
Transport Model
DRAFTDRAFTDRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
Road: 13,597 kmAir: 12 airports
TEN-T Network
Rail: 13,216 kmSea: 13 ports
DRAFTDRAFTDRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
TEN-T Network: Road Conditions and Traffic Levels
DRAFTDRAFTDRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
TEN-T Network: Railway Status and Freight Volume
DRAFTDRAFTDRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
TEN-T Network: IWW/Port Freight Volumes and Air Traffic
DRAFTDRAFTDRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
Implementation and Funding Capacity (2020 horizon)Consideration Armenia Azerbaijan Belarus Georgia Moldova Ukraine
FISCAL SPACEheadroom @ 60% D:GDP
in 2020 [€m]228 11,581 3,703 2,923 1,771 -
IMPLEMENTATION
Historical IFI disbursement ratios 9.1% 9.3% 13.5% 8.3% 4.0% 7.2%
Projected IFI disbursements
by 2020 [€m]215 643 95 458 76 409
BUDGET SPACEAvg. past transport spending
as % GDP in 20170.76% 0.80% 0.35% 2.85% 0.27% .81%
3 yr. average capex spend [€m] 75 280 163 384 19 750
Est. or stated budget space up
through 2020 [€m]228 853 491 4,337 57 2,997
BEST ESTIMATE [€m] 215 853 491 458 76 409
DRAFTDRAFTDRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
Implementation and Funding Capacity (2030 horizon)Consideration Armenia Azerbaijan Belarus Georgia Moldova Ukraine
FISCAL SPACEheadroom @ 60% D:GDP
in 2030 [€m] 1,394 24,097 7,907 6,346 1,690 17,633
IMPLEMENTATION
Historical IFI disbursement ratios 9.1% 9.3% 13.5% 8.3% 4.0% 7.2%
Projected IFI disbursements by 2030 [€m] 1,207 3,614 534 2,572 430 2,301
BUDGET SPACEAvg. past transport spending
as % GDP in 2017 0.76% 0.80% 0.35% 2.85% 0.27% .81%
Est. or stated budget space up through 2030 [€m] 1,026 3,847 2,167 16,690 272 13,528
BEST ESTIMATE [€m] 1,207 3,847 2,167 2,572 430 2,301
DRAFTDRAFTDRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
Benchmarks
DB Indicator (2018) EaPC Average Rank /190
Dealing with construction permits 84
Trading across borders 64
Enforcing contracts 43
Resolving insolvency 81
WGI Indicator (2016) EaPC Average Score /100
Control of corruption 34.3
Government effectiveness 44.5
Political Stability and Absence of Violence/Terrorism
28.4
Procuring Infrastructure PPPs (2018) EaPC Average Score /100
Preparation of PPPs 50.8
Procurement of PPPs 57.3
PPP contract management 38
DRAFTDRAFTDRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
Priority Projects in Armenia
AM/ROAD/3: M7 Vanadzor - Gyumri - Akhurik, Vanadzor-Guimri section (not TEN-T)Finance: Potential IFIsInvestment: €50.8mEIRR: 6%
ROAD LONG-TERM
AM/ROAD/2: North-South Road Corridor: Gyumri-Bavra (Tranche 5)Finance: EIB consideringInvestment: €41mEIRR: 8%
ROAD LONG-TERM
BLACK SPOTSSyunik Region (2017)Accidents: 169Fatalities: 22Injuries: 247
Kapan (2017)Accidents: 70Fatalities: 6Injuries: 85
Meghri (2017)Accidents: 15Fatalities: 1Injuries: 20
Goris (2017)Accidents: 51Fatalities: 4Injuries: 81
Sisian (2017)Accidents: 33Fatalities: 11Injuries: 61
Syunik section of M2/H45 (southern road rehabilitation) Finance: Potential IFIsInvestment: €50m - €200m (potential for segmentation of rehabilitation work)EIRR: 30%+ (similar projects used as a benchmark)
ROAD LONG-TERM
DRAFTDRAFTDRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
Trade with Russia
Traffic to TbilisiCross-borderConnectivity
IN FO
CUS
DRAFTDRAFTDRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
Armenia: Key Financing and Implementation Aspects
Key implementation :• Ongoing works on two main parts of TEN-T• Possible need to rethink the TEN-T and include the M7 road
to create a N-S corridor compatible with Georgian network• Weak coordination and project implementation capacity• Urgent need for project prioritization
Priorities for 2020• Completion of on-going works• Developing design documents for identified priorities, and• Developing prioritized transport network
Key funding aspects:• Decreasing year on year spending on transport• Strong fiscal constraints – IFIs have indicated no new lending
prior to 2020• Government spending on CAPEX is small -6-10% of total
budget• Key priorities on core TEN-T need high capex
Priorities to 2030:• Limited program to 2030 on core network• Need to refocus effort on non-core network• Reassess viability of some proposed projects i.e. different
design standards
TOTAL INVESTMENT AMOUNT
SPENDING SPACE
€0.5bn€1.2bn
DRAFTDRAFTDRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
Priority Projects in Azerbaijan
AZ/RAIL/1: East-West railways: remaining signaling, telecommunications and electrificationFinance: Potential IFIsInvestment: €328mEIRR: 11.7%
RAIL LONG-TERM
AZ/LC/1: Alyat Free Trade Zone and logistics centerFinance: PPPInvestment: €410mEIRR: 5.3% (FS ongoing)
LOGISTICS LONG-TERM
AZ/LC/2: Creation of Logistics CentersFinance: PPPInvestment: €369mEIRR: 20%
LOGISTICS LONG-TERM
DRAFTDRAFTDRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
Logistics Centers
IN FO
CUS
Create an enabling environment for transit trade• Strengthen the role of the country as a regional
logistics and trade hub
• Complete the ongoing infrastructure investments along the east-west and north-south corridors
• Improve logistics services
Higher value addition to transit trade• Increase the role of Baku as a regional trade
center
• Established export-orientated productions
• Develop logistics centers
Incentives for logistics and trade• Increase private sector participation in logistics
Targets
Complete ongoing investments by 2021/22• Roads and railways along the Core TEN-T network
Focus on corridor management and logistics• Improve Logistics Performance Index (LPI)
score from 125 to 30 by 2020
• Focus upon corridor management
• Develop Baku’s role as a regional trade center
• Improve intermodal terminals
• Develop ICT systems to link transport system operators and improve the tracking of freight
• Harmonizing national laws and regulations with those of the EU
• Establish Alyat as a modern green port with a free-trade zone
• Harmonize regulations and laws with EU standards
• Create incentives for private sector participation in logistics and corridor management/operations
Focus on vocational training
Priorities in Azerbaijan
DRAFTDRAFTDRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
Azerbaijan: Key Financing and Implementation Aspects
Key implementation aspects:• Advanced level of implementation of core and
comprehensive TEN-T network• Role of MoT is currently being defined; currently
responsibility on strategy and priorities is split between agencies
Priorities for 2020• Focus on improving railways efficiency and implementation of
ongoing projects• Focus on logistics activities (national priority to reach top 30
LPI by 2020, from 125)
Key funding aspects:• Focus on attracting private sector: law on PPP under
preparation• Low debt levels• Substantial IFI portfolio, largest in EaP region• Going forward more constraints on budget due to falling oil
prices.
Priorities for 2030:• Focus on attracting private sector participation in logistics
activities
TOTAL INVESTMENT AMOUNT
SPENDING SPACE
€2bn€3.8bn
DRAFTDRAFTDRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
Priority Projects in Belarus: Railways
BY/RAIL/2: Electrification of Zhlobin - Kalinkovichi - Barbarov(143km) Railway TrackFinance: EIB/EBRD Investment: €79.5mEIRR: 13%
RAIL LONG-TERM
BY/RAIL/1: Modernization of the Contact Network at Zhdanovichi-Molodechno Section of Minsk RegionFinance: EIB/EBRD Investment: €35.3mEIRR: 13%
RAIL QUICK WIN
DRAFTDRAFTDRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
Priority Projects in Belarus: Roads
BY/ROAD/3: Road M-7/ E 28 Minsk – Oshmyany – Border of the Republic of Lithuania (Kamenny Log), km 57.7 – km 148.752Finance: Possible EIBInvestment: €82mEIRR: 15.6%
ROAD
BY/ROAD/10: ITS for M-1 / E30 on sections Brest -Baranowichi and Minsk - the Border of Russian Federation Finance: App. for NDPTL GrantInvestment: €10.4mEIRR: 32.3%
ROAD QUICK WIN
BY/ROAD/11: Reconstruction of the Road Border Crossing Point "Kamenny Log" (Lithuania - Belarus) Finance: Possible EIBInvestment: €23.8mEIRR: 13.7%
ROAD QUICK WIN
LONG-TERM
BY/ROAD/6 & 7: Sections of M-10 Border of Russian Federation (Selische) – Gomel – Kobrin (km 0-27, km 193.2-320.3)Finance: Likely IFIsInvestment: €305mEIRR: 9.5%
ROAD LONG-TERMBY/ROAD/4: Road M-10 Border of Russian Federation (Selische) – Gomel – Kobrin, km 109.9 – km 195.15Finance: PPP (EBRD Structuring)Investment: €207.5mEIRR: 12%
ROAD LONG-TERM
BY/ROAD/9: Pedestrian crossings on M-1Finance: App. for NDPTL GrantInvestment: €0.3mEIRR: 27.5%
ROAD QUICK WIN
BY/ROAD/5: M-8/E 95 Border of Russian Federation (Ezerische) – Vitebsk – Gomel – Border of Ukraine (Novaya Guta), km 87.9 – km 151.0Finance: Likely IFIsInvestment: €139.4mEIRR: 10.1%
ROAD LONG-TERM
BY/ROAD/2 & 8: Road R-20 Vitebsk - Polotsk - Border of LatviaFinance: Likely IFIsInvestment: €155.8mEIRR: 23%
ROAD LONG-TERM
DRAFTDRAFTDRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
Inland Waterways
BY/IWW/1: Restoration of the International Waterway E40 in Belarus
The proposed E40 water way will connect the Baltic and Black seas through the Vistula in Poland, the Pripyat in
Belarus and the Dnieper in Ukraine. The project will require an extensive feasibility study but improvement of
the Pripyat in Belarus has not been prioritized in this exercise because:
• Traffic volumes are low and there is limited potential for diversion (but there is limited data)
• The route is environmentally sensitive and would require a new canal to be built in Poland and investments
in Ukraine on the Dnieper
• There are alternative modes of transport on this route including a rail line and a road link (GO highway)
IN FO
CUS
Kyiv Lock and Pool Above• Lock at high risk of failure• Optimum traffic flow is hindered
Kaniv Lock and Pool Above• Individual systems present a
medium risk of failure• Optimum traffic flow is hindered
Kremenchuk Lock and Pool Above• Lock at high risk of failure• Optimum traffic flow is hindered
Kamenskye Lock and Pool Above• Lock at high risk of failure• River not navigable
Zaporijjya Lock and Pool Above• Lock at high risk of failure• Optimum traffic flow is hindered
Kahovka Lock and Pool Above• Lock at high risk of failure• Optimum traffic flow is hindered
River/lock assessment: 2017 Royal HaskoningDHV/EBRD Sustainable Transport TA Programme
DRAFTDRAFTDRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
Belarus: Key Financing and Implementation Aspects
Key implementation aspects:• Advanced level of implementation of TEN-T network• Most key priorities have preparatory work• Good approaches to maintenance of existing assets• Good coordination from relevant authorities
Priorities for 2020:• Large investments in logistics centers: these are under-
utilized, need to improve efficiency (TA)• Implement existing pipeline of projects
Key funding aspects:• Significant road fund with good spending on maintenance• Low budget spending on transport although no visibility of
railway spending• No major lending constraints
Priorities for 2030:• Undertake comprehensive FS for waterways corridor• Work on attracting PPP for infrastructure finance
TOTAL INVESTMENT AMOUNT
SPENDING SPACE
€1.2bn€2.2bn
DRAFTDRAFTDRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
Priority Projects in Georgia: Logistics
GE/LC/1: Tbilisi Kumisi Logistic CentreFinance: EIB ProposedInvestment: €78.3mEIRR: 21%
LOGISTICS LONG-TERM
GE/LC/2: Logistic Center in KutaisiFinance: ADB ProposedInvestment: €61.5mEIRR: 27%
LOGISTICS LONG-TERM
GE/LC/3: Cargo Terminal in Kutaisi AirportFinance: Likely PPPInvestment: €61.5mEIRR: 20%
LOGISTICS LONG-TERM
DRAFTDRAFTDRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
ROADGE/ROAD/8: Sadakhlo Friendship BridgeFinance: EBRDInvestment: €5.7mEIRR: 15%
QUICK WIN
Priority Projects in Georgia: Roads
GE/ROAD/5: Rehabilitation of Grigoleti – Poti RoadFinance: EIB ProposedInvestment: €123mEIRR: 10%
ROAD LONG-TERM
GE/ROAD/6: Tbilisi BypassFinance: ADB ProposedInvestment: €287mEIRR: 18%
ROAD LONG-TERM
GE/ROAD/1: East-West Highway: Section Chumateleti -Argveta of E60 Finance: EIB/EBRD/WB/JICAInvestment: €779mEIRR: 13.6%
ROAD LONG-TERM
GE/ROAD/2: Rustavi - Red Bridge HighwayFinance: EIB ProposedInvestment: €102.5mEIRR: 16.2
ROAD LONG-TERMGE/ROAD/3: Construction of new road Batumi Bypass - Sarpi(Border of Turkey)Finance: EIB/EBRD/WB/JICAInvestment: €90.2mEIRR: 18%
ROAD LONG-TERM
GE/ROAD/4: Rehabilitation of Grigoleti – CholoqiFinance: EIBInvestment: €73.8mEIRR: 12.3%
ROAD LONG-TERM
GE/ROAD/7: Sadakhlo-AlgetiFinance: EIBInvestment: €73.8mEIRR: 15.2%
ROAD LONG-TERM
DRAFTDRAFTDRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
Logistics Centers
Like Azerbaijan, Georgia is at an advanced stage of TEN-T implementation.Priorities in Georgia• Promotion of multi-modality (rail services are at a
disadvantage when compared with road transport)• Optimization logistics network and ensure ICT
integration• Liberalization of rail transport• Focus on vocational trainingChallenges: • Ports lacks reliability• Road border-crossing points are bottlenecks• Port costs are unreasonably high
IN FO
CUS
DRAFTDRAFTDRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
Georgia: Key Financing and Implementation Aspects
Key implementation aspects:• Advanced level of implementation of TEN-T network
• Most of key priorities have preparatory work
• Very good coordination from relevant authorities
Priorities for 2020:• Completion of EW highway
• Future activities to focus on improved logistics and attracting
private sector
Key funding aspects:• Government forecast a large increase in transport spending to
11% of GDP??
• A lot of resources to accommodate E-W highway
• Debt levels good and no major constraints on fiscal space
Priorities for 2030:• Substantial 2030 program, needs good preparation
• Focus on logistics will require good cooperation with private
sector
TOTAL INVESTMENT AMOUNTSPENDING SPACE€2.4bn€2.5bn
DRAFTDRAFTDRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
Priority Projects in Moldova: Roads and Ports
ML/ROAD/4: Chisinau Ring Highway (section 2-4)Finance: IFIsInvestment: €41mEIRR: 16.6%
ROADS LONG-TERM
Implementation of Weight in Motion Finance: IFIs/National Budget Investment: €16.4mEIRR: 59.5%
ROADS QUICK WINML/ROAD/2: M-14 - Section Balti - Criva (rehabilitation)Finance: IFIsInvestment: €128.7mEIRR: 7.6%
ROADS LONG-TERM
ML/ROAD/3: M-21 Chisinau - Dubasari - Goianul Nou - Ukrainian Border (rehabilitation)Finance: IFIsInvestment: €47.6mEIRR: 9.7%
ROADS LONG-TERM
ML/ROAD/6: M14 Chisinau – Kuciurgan (UA)Finance: IFIsInvestment: €66.4mEIRR: 14%
ROADS LONG-TERM
ML/PORT/1: Giurgiulesti Port Infrastructure Finance: IFIs/National Budget Investment: €3.3mEIRR: 11.2%
PORT QUICK WIN
DRAFTDRAFTDRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
Southern Railways
IN FO
CUS
Giurgiulesti – Abaclia Rail Link
• Not yet part of the TEN-T network, despite having the heaviest flow of rail traffic in Moldova at 5,018 ton/day
DRAFTDRAFTDRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
Moldova: Key Financing and Implementation Aspects
Key implementation aspects:• Most on-going investment and preparation work not on the
core TEN-T network• There is a need to rethink the TEN-T network• Poor implementation performance is key constraint to new
investment
Priorities for 2020:• Key priority for 2020 is a focus on project preparation and
project implementation• Currently developments on links to Transnistria may play a
key role in project prioritization going forward
Key funding aspects:• Lowest disbursement ration in EaP of IFI loans• Lowest spending on transport in the EaP region• Deteriorating fiscal situation and stagnating
Priorities to 2030:• Rethink prioritization of rail network related to core
network• Start implementation of routes to the North and East to
connect with Ukraine
TOTAL INVESTMENT AMOUNTSPENDING SPACE€0.4bn€0.4bn
DRAFTDRAFTDRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
Priority Projects in Ukraine: Rail, IWW, Ports and Airports
UKR/IWW/1: Dnipro Locks Reconstruction as part of the Dnipro Development InitiativeFinance: Possible EIBInvestment: €57.4mEIRR: 47%
IWW QUICK WIN
UKR/PORT/1 & 3: Dredging/Berth Reconstruction in Yuzhniy PortFinance: National Budget/PPP Investment: €284.5mEIRR: 4% (further analysis needed)
PORT LONG-TERM
UKR/RAIL/4: Increase of the Train Handling Capacity within Section Hrebinka – PoltavaFinance: Likely IFIsInvestment: €24.6mEIRR: 30%
RAIL LONG-TERM
UKR/RAIL/3: Zhytomyr - Vapnyarka rail lineFinance: Likely IFIsInvestment: €205mEIRR: 22%
RAIL LONG-TERM
Second Runway at Odessa Airport Finance: Likely IFIs Investment: €98.4mEIRR: 36%
AIR LONG-TERM
UKR/RAIL/2: Implementation of Railway Service Mukachevo – Chop –Zahony (Hungary)/Chierna-nad-Tisoj (Slovakia)Finance: Possible EIBInvestment: €13.3mEIRR: 47%
RAIL QUICK WIN
UKR/PORT/3: Berth Reconstruction in Chernomorsk Port Finance: PPP Investment: €69.7mEIRR: 9%
PORT LONG-TERM
UKR/RAIL/1: Modernization of the Railway Gauge 1435 mm on the Section Kovel – Yagodyn – State Border with Further ElectrificationFinance: Possible EIBInvestment: €41mEIRR: 19%
RAIL QUICK WIN
UKR/PORT/4: Improve railway access to Odessa and Mykolaiv PortsFinance: Likely IFIsInvestment: €16.4mEIRR: 11.6%
PORT QUICK WIN
UKR/RAIL/5: Electrification of the Railway Section Berdychiv – Korosten – BerezhestFinance: Discussions with EIBInvestment: €135.4mEIRR: 16%
RAIL LONG-TERM
UKR/PORT/2: Construction of Berth No. 8 of Mykolaiv Sea PortFinance: EIBInvestment: €9mEIRR: 10%
PORT QUICK WIN
UKR/PORT/1: Yuzhny State Stevedoring Company ConcessionFinance: PPP
PORT QUICK WINUKR/PORT/3: Chornomorsk State Stevedoring Company ConcessionFinance: PPP
PORT QUICK WIN
DRAFTDRAFTDRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
Priority Projects in Ukraine: Road
Implementation of E-tolling, weight in motion and automatic speed enforcementFinance: Likely PPP Investment: €41mEIRR: 118.9%
ROAD QUICK WIN
UKR/ROAD/9: M-03 Chutove – KharkivFinance: WB Investment: €191.1mEIRR: 16.5%
ROAD LONG-TERM
UKR/ROAD/5: H-02 Lviv – TernopilFinance: Potential PPP Investment: €133m (assuming rehabilitation)EIRR: 14%
ROAD LONG-TERM
UKR/ROAD/4: H-11 Dnipro – MykolaivFinance: IFIsInvestment: €321m (assuming rehabilitation)EIRR: 8.5%
ROAD LONG-TERM
DRAFTDRAFTDRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
Go Highway
IN FO
CUS
Currently the GO highway serves mainly local traffic. While the highway is well-used, only 10 trucks per day traverse the entire road from Odessa to Krakovets. The optimum strategy for the improvement of this highway will probably be a combination of capacity expansion on key parts of the route, some have been prioritized here, but also the rehabilitation of the existing road where returns will be higher. An on-going feasibility study will identify the exact strategy.
Capacity Improvement to Category 1 • EIRR: 2.4%
Rehabilitation of Existing Road• EIRR: 12%
DRAFTDRAFTDRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
Ukraine: Key Financing and Implementation Aspects
Key implementation aspects:• Good level of completion of core TEN-T road network (main
T) – maintenance serious concern• Rail network generally better managed• Poor absorptive capacity• Government priorities change regularly, priorities not
technically informed, master Plan to start soon
Priorities for 2020:• Focus on implementation of 2020 priorities – approx. Eur 1.8
billion• Address poor implementation performance – undisbursed
balances exceed Euro 1 Billion• Increase spending on project preparation and
implementation• Implement network efficiency quick wins• To prepare and approve the transport master plan
Key funding aspects:• Currently constrained fiscal space but projected to improve• Road fund to begin in 2018 will bring additional resources to
the road sector• Second lowest disbursement ratio of IFI loans in EaP region• Projecting big increase in transport budget for 2018 and
doubling of CAPEX
Priorities for 2030:• Increase efforts to attract private sector capital• Focus on linking Odessa with Europe – through GO Highway• Review design standards to insure cost effective use of
resources
TOTAL INVESTMENT AMOUNT
SPENDING SPACE €2.7bn€2.3bn
DRAFTDRAFTDRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFTITS for M-1 / E30
Network efficiency
TOW
ARDS
BET
TER
Training: Private operators rate the reliability of journey times as paramount. Professional logistics operators are the key.
Tolling systems: Provide much needed revenue to the sector, future revenues can be securitized to raise private finance for investments
Automatic speed enforcement: Cutting speed saves lives
Weight control systems: Automated systems can increase revenues, limit corruption and protect key infrastructure assets
Intelligent highways: provide information to manage journey times to avoid congestion, limit border crossing times, provide emergency response, link to multi-modal systems
Weight in Motion
E-tolling and automatic speed enforcement
• Very large economic returns
• Initial investments are relatively modest
• Private sector can finance investments and subsequent operations
• Payback periods are often between 1 and 5 years infrastructure
• Possibility to generate revenues
DRAFTDRAFTDRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
Absorptive capacity
TOW
ARDS
BET
TER
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
Armenia Azerbaijan Belarus Georgia Moldova,Republic of
Ukraine
Ave
rage
Dis
burs
emen
t Rat
io
DISBURSEMENT RATIOS BY IFIS IN EAPCOUNTRIES
EBRD EIB WB ADB Wgt. Avg.
Key issues include:• Inadequate project preparation• Weak procurement systems• Weak local industry• Lack of transparence• Corruption
DRAFTDRAFTDRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
Private Sector
Participation
TOW
ARDS
BET
TER
- 1 2 3 4
ArmeniaAzerbaijan
BelarusGeorgia
Republic of MoldovaUkraine
Number of PPP Transactions by Country and Sector Since Yr. 2000
RoadsRailwaysPortsAirports
Airports4
Ports5
Railways2
Roads0
Treatment plant
1
Water Utility
7
Electricity48
ICT17
Natural Gas14
# of PPP Transactions in EAP countries since yr. 2000
Airports409
Ports675
Railways579
Roads-
Treatment …
Water Utility
637 Electricity
4,772
ICT17,427
Natural Gas
3,448
US$ mil. PPP Transactions in EAP countries since yr. 2000
DRAFTDRAFTDRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
Maintenance
TOW
ARDS
BET
TER
This presentation focuses on prioritization of new investments but the first priority should always be on the maintenance of existing assets
• Investment in maintenance will always deliver the highest economic returns – for every $ spent on maintenance at least $3 will be saved in vehicle operating costs
• Countries should invest in good asset management systems and regular data collection to measure condition of infrastructure assets
• Good maintenance will save lives, reduce emissions and improve the public and investor perception of the transport system
DRAFTDRAFTDRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
Project Preparation
TOW
ARDS
BET
TER
The key recommendation emerging from this study is that more attention and resources should be given to high quality project preparation and implementation
The results from this work suggest that there is weak pipeline of projects and implementation of existing projects is slow
We would recommend setting up a multi-agency fund to finance this work with an agreed level of counterpart funding from government.
The fund would finance preparation and implementation activities associated with the agreed investment plan contained in this document. Specifically it would:• Finance preparation of FS, detailed engineering, social and environmental work and bidding
documents• Finance support to implementing agencies to effectively manage the preparation process• Finance support to implementing agencies to effectively implement the projects
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Armenia Azerbaijan Belarus Georgia Moldova Ukraine
Number of Identified Feasibility Studies
Ongoing analysis of BCP’s
Verification of key model parameters and
deeper model assessments
No data on large bilaterals including China and Russia
Additional prioritization processes in particular
for Ukraine
Additional railways data needed for Ukraine and
BelarusFurther consultation with the countries
Outstanding issues
Thank you!