dtm ecuador report 4 - 7 may 2016

12
1 www.humanitarianresponse.info/en/operations/ecuador/coordinaci%C3%B3n-y-gesti%C3%B3n-de-campamentos [email protected] International Organization for Migration (IOM) Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM) Ecuador Earthquake 2016 Site assessments – Round 1 In response to the earthquake in Pedernales, Ecuador, the International Organization for Migration (IOM) is currently implementing the Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM). DTM Ecuador is collecting information regarding the locations, the numbers, the needs and the vulnerabilities of the population displaced as a result of the earthquake. This first report of DTM Ecuador presents the main findings derived from the information collected in 76 sites hosting 10 or more displaced families in various regions affected by the earthquake 1 . The evaluation was implemented in different cantons in the provinces of Manabí and Esmeraldas between the 4 th and 7 th of May 2016. Methodology The assessment was carried out by three IOM mobile teams with a questionnaire administered to key informants 2 in order to obtain updated information on the conditions of the sites where displaced persons are hosted. The unit of assessment is a site (i.e. camp, lodgings or collective centers, spontaneous sites and host families) and data from the Ministry of Social and Economic Inclusion (MIES) was used as the basis for identifying the sites on the ground. The data collected includes, among others: Site classification. Use of the site before the arrival of displaced population. Demographic data of the displaced population. Information on vulnerable groups. Conditions in the sites and needs by sector (e.g. water, health, food etc.). Perceptions of security, privacy and dignity. 1 Some of the evaluated sites could have less than 10. Note also that there can be cases of sites hosting 10 or more families which have not been captured by the first evaluation. In future evaluations, DTM will include a greater number of geographical areas in order to provide a more complete view of displacement caused by the earthquake. 2 Including staff from the Ministry of Social and Economic Inclusion, Armed Forces, community leaders and displaced persons.

Upload: international-organization-for-migration-iom

Post on 29-Jul-2016

223 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM) in close coordination with the Government of Ecuador, has released the first findings of the main needs and vulnerabilities currently faced by displaced people in Manabi and Esmeraldas, two of the six provinces in Ecuador affected by the 16th April 2016 earthquake. #GlobalDTM

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: DTM Ecuador report 4 - 7 May 2016

1 www.humanitarianresponse.info/en/operations/ecuador/coordinaci%C3%B3n-y-gesti%C3%B3n-de-campamentos [email protected]

International Organization for Migration (IOM) Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM)

Ecuador Earthquake 2016 Site assessments – Round 1

In response to the earthquake in Pedernales, Ecuador, the International Organization for

Migration (IOM) is currently implementing the Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM). DTM

Ecuador is collecting information regarding the locations, the numbers, the needs and the

vulnerabilities of the population displaced as a result of the earthquake.

This first report of DTM Ecuador presents the main findings derived from the information

collected in 76 sites hosting 10 or more displaced families in various regions affected by the

earthquake1. The evaluation was implemented in different cantons in the provinces of Manabí

and Esmeraldas between the 4th and 7th of May 2016.

Methodology

The assessment was carried out by three IOM mobile teams with a questionnaire administered to

key informants2 in order to obtain updated information on the conditions of the sites where

displaced persons are hosted.

The unit of assessment is a site (i.e. camp, lodgings or collective centers, spontaneous sites and

host families) and data from the Ministry of Social and Economic Inclusion (MIES) was used as the

basis for identifying the sites on the ground.

The data collected includes, among others:

Site classification.

Use of the site before the arrival of displaced population.

Demographic data of the displaced population.

Information on vulnerable groups.

Conditions in the sites and needs by sector (e.g. water, health, food etc.).

Perceptions of security, privacy and dignity.

1 Some of the evaluated sites could have less than 10. Note also that there can be cases of sites hosting 10 or more families which have not been captured by the first evaluation. In future evaluations, DTM will include a greater number of geographical areas in order to provide a more complete view of displacement caused by the earthquake. 2 Including staff from the Ministry of Social and Economic Inclusion, Armed Forces, community leaders and displaced persons.

Page 2: DTM Ecuador report 4 - 7 May 2016

2 www.humanitarianresponse.info/en/operations/ecuador/coordinaci%C3%B3n-y-gesti%C3%B3n-de-campamentos [email protected]

Assessed provinces and cantons

The majority of assessed sites were in cantons of the Manabí province, Manta standing out with

14 affected sites and Jama and Portoviejo with 7 sites each. The remaining 23 sites are located in

the Esmeraldas province in the Muisne canton.

Table 1. Number of assessed sites by province and canton

Province Canton Number of sites

Esmeraldas Muisne 23

Manabí Bolívar 1

Chone 1

Flavio Alfaro 4

Jama 7

Jaramijó 1

Manta 14

Montecristi 2

Pedernales 4

Portoviejo 7

Rocafuerte 4

San Vicente 6

Sucre 2

Total 76

Muisne30%

Bolívar4%

Chone1%

Flavio Alfaro3%Jama

9%Jaramijó

1%

Manta19%

Montecristi3%

Pedernales5%

Portoviejo9%

Rocafuerte5%

San Vicente8%

Sucre3%

Chart 1. Assesed sites per canton

Page 3: DTM Ecuador report 4 - 7 May 2016

3 www.humanitarianresponse.info/en/operations/ecuador/coordinaci%C3%B3n-y-gesti%C3%B3n-de-campamentos [email protected]

Displaced population

The 76 sites assessed by IOM are currently hosting 2,989 families with a total of 11,274 individuals.

As mentioned above, the number includes only families and persons in sites hosting 10 or more

families. The number captured by DTM is, thus, smaller than the number reported by MIES and

the estimates of the Ministry of Urban Development and Housing (MIDUVI) (based on an

assessment of affected homes).

73,000 estimated living based on evaluation of

by MIDUVI

33,000 identified by MIES

11,274 monitored by IOM/DTM

Page 4: DTM Ecuador report 4 - 7 May 2016

4 www.humanitarianresponse.info/en/operations/ecuador/coordinaci%C3%B3n-y-gesti%C3%B3n-de-campamentos [email protected]

Map 1. Displaced population (individuals) by canton

Page 5: DTM Ecuador report 4 - 7 May 2016

5 www.humanitarianresponse.info/en/operations/ecuador/coordinaci%C3%B3n-y-gesti%C3%B3n-de-campamentos [email protected]

Use of the sites before displacement

The majority of sites are located in open lots. However, it is important to note that 19 assessed

sites – 25% of the total – were used as schools before accommodating the displaced population.

Water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH)

In terms of WASH, it is important to note that the distribution and quantity of water varies

depending on factors such as location of sites (i.e. rural or urban) and the presence of authorities

like MIES and the Armed Forces.

More than 50% of the sites report receiving more than two liters of drinking water per person per

day. Nonetheless, around 37% reported that they had received drinking water distributions, while

in approximately 6% it was reported that less than two liters of water per person were received.

A similar situation presents itself with regard to water for domestic consumption purposes: the

majority of sites evaluated report receiving sufficient water daily, but a considerable number does

not receive water or the quantity is insufficient.

2019 19

8 8

2

0

5

10

15

20

25

Lote abierto Otro Escuela Parque oplaza

Centrodeportivo

Edificioprivado

Chart 2: Site use before displacement

Page 6: DTM Ecuador report 4 - 7 May 2016

6 www.humanitarianresponse.info/en/operations/ecuador/coordinaci%C3%B3n-y-gesti%C3%B3n-de-campamentos [email protected]

Sites accommodating displaced people in rural areas present deficient and in some cases critical

conditions, in terms of equipment for sanitation and hygiene. The number of available latrines in

the majority of sites is insufficient and there are sites in which there are no latrines or where the

number of persons per latrines is higher than 100: in the evaluated sites, 18 do not have latrines

and in 4 there are more than 100 people per latrine.

53%

6%

37%

1% 3%

Chart 3. Daily distribution of drinking water

Sí, más de 2L porpersona

Sí, menos de 2L porpersona

No

No sabe

No info

60%8%

28%

1% 3%

Chart 4. Daily distribution of water for domestic use

Sí, más de 15L porpersona

Sí, menos de 15Lpor persona

No

No sabe

No info

Page 7: DTM Ecuador report 4 - 7 May 2016

7 www.humanitarianresponse.info/en/operations/ecuador/coordinaci%C3%B3n-y-gesti%C3%B3n-de-campamentos [email protected]

Similarly, it was confirmed that a considerable number of sites do not have

latrines/bathrooms and separate bathing areas for men and women.

Diet and nutrition

In terms of diet and nutrition, it is reported that in 34% of the assessed sites food distribution is

irregular, meanwhile in 22% it is daily and in 18% it is distributed two times per week. The majority

of sites report that there is no distribution of supplementary nutrition to lactating mothers,

pregnant women and children.

5% 4%

9%

21%

37%

24%

Chart5. Number of persons per latrine

Más de 100

Entre 76 y 100

Entre 51 y 75

Entre 26 y 50

Menos de 25

Sin letrinas

65%

35%

Chart 6. Latrines separated for men and women

No

75%

25%

Chart 7. Shower facilities separated for men and women

No

Page 8: DTM Ecuador report 4 - 7 May 2016

8 www.humanitarianresponse.info/en/operations/ecuador/coordinaci%C3%B3n-y-gesti%C3%B3n-de-campamentos [email protected]

Health

The primary health issue reported in 33% of the sites are acute respiratory infections, while 20%

cite diarrhea. Given the sanitation conditions in the majority of visited sites, it is possible that

infections will increase in frequency as many interviewees have mentioned the presence of flies

and mosquitos is rising.

26

17

14

9

42

1 1 1 1

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Irregular Todos losdías

Dosveces porsemana

Una vezpor

semana

Nunca No info Una vezal mes

Porcuentapropia

Cada dossemanas

No sabe

Chart 8. Frequency of food distributions

25

15

10

64 3

2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Chart 9. Principal health concerns

Page 9: DTM Ecuador report 4 - 7 May 2016

9 www.humanitarianresponse.info/en/operations/ecuador/coordinaci%C3%B3n-y-gesti%C3%B3n-de-campamentos [email protected]

Although the majority of sites covered by the assessment have health service points or receive

assistance through mobile clinics, 32% of sites reported that the displaced population has no

secure Access to health services and installments.

Livelihoods

Given that the earthquake-affected zones are on Ecuador’s coast, 34 sites (45% of the total) cited

fishing as the occupation of the majority of men, with 11 sites (14% of the total) reporting

agriculture as men’s main occupation, and 7 sites (9% of the total) reporting the majority of men

to be employed in the informal sector. Meanwhile, in 29 of assessed sites (38% of the total)

women’s main occupation is in domestic work, with 10 sites (13%) reporting that the majority of

women work in fishing.

64%

32%

3% 1%

Chart 10. Secure access to health services and installations

No

34

11

7 6

11

3 2 1 1

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Chart 11. Principal occupation of men in assessed sites

Page 10: DTM Ecuador report 4 - 7 May 2016

10 www.humanitarianresponse.info/en/operations/ecuador/coordinaci%C3%B3n-y-gesti%C3%B3n-de-campamentos [email protected]

In 60% of assessed sites it was reported that less than 25% of households currently have access

to income-generating activities, with fishing activities in the zone affected by the earthquake.

Security, dignity and privacy

The majority of assessed sites did not report significant security issues. This is largely due to the

frequent presence of police and army in or nearby displacement sites. Nevertheless, 37% of

assessed sites reported that there is no permanent presence of security forces.

29

109

8

5

14

1

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Ama de casa Pesca Ninguno No info Comercioinformal

Otro No sabe

Chart 12. Principal occupation of women in assessed sites

60%24%

1%5%

7%

3%

Chart 13. Percentage of households with access to income-generating activities

Menor al 25%

De 26% a 50%

De 51% a 75%

De 76% a 100%

No info

No responde

Page 11: DTM Ecuador report 4 - 7 May 2016

11 www.humanitarianresponse.info/en/operations/ecuador/coordinaci%C3%B3n-y-gesti%C3%B3n-de-campamentos [email protected]

It is also noteworthy that a significant number of assessed sites reported not having lighting in

communal areas or, where lighting exists, that it is insufficient. Less than half of the assessed sites

have adequate lighting in communal areas.

Meanwhile, in 25% of assessed sites did key informants confirm that there are places on site which

women and girls prefer to avoid.

37%

62%

1%

Chart 14. Permanent security presence on site

No

No info

None21%

Adequate48%

Deficient30%

No info1%

Chart 15. Lighting in communal areas

Page 12: DTM Ecuador report 4 - 7 May 2016

12 www.humanitarianresponse.info/en/operations/ecuador/coordinaci%C3%B3n-y-gesti%C3%B3n-de-campamentos [email protected]

Access to Information

In 22 assessed sites (29% of the total) the displaced population mentioned more information

about access to humanitarian assistance as the primary information need, whilst in 9 sites (12%

of the total) they expressed a primary wish for more information about security, and in 7 sites (9%

of the total) more information about the situation in areas of origin was considered most

important.

74%

25%

1%

Chart 16. Prevalence of areas which women and girls tend to avoid

No Sí No info

22

119

7 75

4

8

2 1

0

5

10

15

20

25

Chart 17. Additional information which would be useful