drought risk map of finnish forests - metla · and created a drought-vulnerability map for finland....

1
Metla/853407/SElo/11.2014 Aim In boreal forests, some growing sites are more vulnerable to decreased soil moisture than others, which might result in stress symptoms in trees and thus affect their growth. The aim of this study was to examine the spatial and temporal occurrence of drought damage in boreal forests in Finland, and to identify the potentially drought- prone sites and their climatic conditions (Muukkonen et al. 2015). Material and methods Field data The study area covers entire Finland. The field data consisted of 620 (year 2005), 603 (year 2006), 606 (year 2007) and 488 (year 2008) study sites of the ICP-Level-1 grid, which is an annual tree-crown monitoring data of the pan-European monitoring program ICP Forests (International Co- operative Programme on the Assessment and Monitoring of Air Pollution Effects on Forests), initiated in 1985. GIS data We utilized and combined several different GIS data sets. Firstly, we used vector-type, digital topographic maps provided by the National Land Survey of Finland. Secondly, we calculated Topographic Wetness Index (TWI) based on the digital elevation model (DEM) also provided by the National Land Survey. Thirdly, we calculated Soil Water Indices (SWI) with model (Peltoniemi et al. 2015) based on standard daily weather data spatially interpolated to a 10-km regular grid provided by the Finnish Meteorological Institute. Fourthly, we utilized the data of the Finnish National Forest Inventory (NFI). Analysis We calculated a binary logistic regression and created a drought-vulnerability map for Finland. In this regression, the level of drought damage assumes values between 0 (no damage) and 1 (100% damage). After that, we produced drought risk map over the whole Finland. Figure 1. Soil water index (SWI) during the growing season of 2006. Figure 2. Predicted drought vulnerability in Finland. Vulnerability is the probability (0–100 %) of detecting drought symptoms in a forest during a extremely dry growing season. References Muukkonen, P., Nevalainen, S., Lindgren, M. & Peltoniemi, M. (2015). Spatial occurrence of drought-associated damages in Finnish boreal forests: results from forest condition monitoring and GIS analysis. Boreal Environment Research. In press. Peltoniemi, M., Markkanen, T., Härkönen, S., Muukkonen, P., Thum, T., Aalto, T. & Mäkelä, A. Consistent estimates of gross primary production of Finnish forests - comparison of estimates of two process models. Boreal Environment Research. In press. Conclusions Our results indicate that dry and warm summers may cause an increase in drought- related symptoms in trees. We concluded that the occurrences of drought damage differed spatially, with more drought damage observed in the southern part of the country. The main factor behind this is the higher temperature sum in the south. Additionally, bare rock formations with shallow soil profiles slightly increase the vulnerability to drought. These shallow soil profiles can efficiently narrow down trees’ possibilities to acclimate their root distribution to water acquisition. The TWI confirmed that hill summits are more vulnerable than lower lands in catchment areas. We suggest that the best and the only way to protect against drought is to select the best suitable tree species for each growing site. Acknowledgements This study is part of the EU Life+ project “Climforisk Climate change induced drought effects on forest growth and vulnerability” (LIFE09 ENV/FI/000571). Results The growing season 2006 was extremely dry. The SWI was at a normal level in the whole of Finland during the early stages of the growing season in 2006 (Fig. 1), but at the end of the growing season in the same year its value indicated that the conditions were much dryer than normally since the SWIs for July and August 2006 were only 62.2% and 23.6% of the 30-year average, respectively, while those for May and June 2006 were 100% and 97%, respectively. The binary logistic regression indicated that drought vulnerability can be predicted using variables such as temperature sum, proportion of spruce, proportion of bare rock areas and the TWI. The regression equation is logit(P) = a + bT + cS + dB + eTWI, where T is the temperature sum, S is the share of spruce trees, B is the proportion of bare rock areas and TWI is the topographic wetness index. Vulnerability is the probability (between 0 and 1) of observing drought symptoms in trees during an extreme drought event. The predicted drought vulnerability is highest in southern Finland (Fig. 2). June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 Drought damage sites Scaled SWI 0.00 0.40 0.80 1.20 Drought risk 55% 0% Contact: Mikko Peltoniemi, Finnish Forest Research Institute, P.O. Box 18, FI-01301 Vantaa, Finland [email protected] Drought risk map of Finnish forests Petteri Muukkonen, Seppo Nevalainen, Martti Lindgren & Mikko Peltoniemi f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f ores s st t t k k k k kn n n no o o o ow w w w w w w w w wl le e e e e e e e e e ed dg g g g ge e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e k k k kn no o ow w w wle e e ed dg ge e e e k kn n n n n now w w- -h h h ho o o o o o o ow w w w w w w w kn now-ho o o ow w w w w w w w w we e e e e e e e e el l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l ll l l l l l l l l l l-b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b be e e e e e e e e ei ing g g g g we el l l l l l l l ll l l l-b b b b b b b be e e e eing g g

Upload: others

Post on 03-Oct-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Drought risk map of Finnish forests - Metla · and created a drought-vulnerability map for Finland. In this regression, the level of drought damage assumes values between 0 (no damage)

Metla/853407/SElo/11.2014

AimIn boreal forests, some growing sites are more vulnerable to decreased soil moisture than others, which might result in stress symptoms in trees and thus affect their growth. The aim of this study was to examine the spatial and temporal occurrence of drought damage in boreal forests in Finland, and to identify the potentially drought-prone sites and their climatic conditions (Muukkonen et al. 2015).

Material and methods

Field dataThe study area covers entire Finland. The field data consisted of 620 (year 2005), 603 (year 2006), 606 (year 2007) and 488 (year 2008) study sites of the ICP-Level-1 grid, which is an annual tree-crown monitoring data of the pan-European monitoring program ICP Forests (International Co-operative Programme on the Assessment and Monitoring of Air Pollution Effects on Forests), initiated in 1985.

GIS dataWe utilized and combined several different GIS data sets. Firstly, we used vector-type, digital topographic maps provided by the National Land Survey of Finland. Secondly, we calculated Topographic Wetness Index (TWI) based on the digital elevation model (DEM) also provided by the National Land Survey. Thirdly, we calculated Soil Water Indices (SWI) with model (Peltoniemi et al. 2015) based on standard daily weather data spatially interpolated to a 10-km regular grid provided by the Finnish Meteorological Institute. Fourthly, we utilized the data of the Finnish National Forest Inventory (NFI).

AnalysisWe calculated a binary logistic regression and created a drought-vulnerability map for Finland. In this regression, the level of drought damage assumes values between 0 (no damage) and 1 (100% damage). After that, we produced drought risk map over the whole Finland.

Figure 1. Soil water index (SWI) during the growing season of 2006.

Figure 2. Predicted

drought vulnerability

in Finland. Vulnerability is the probability

(0–100 %) of detecting

drought symptoms in a forest during a extremely dry

growing season.

ReferencesMuukkonen, P., Nevalainen, S., Lindgren, M. & Peltoniemi,

M. (2015). Spatial occurrence of drought-associated damages in Finnish boreal forests: results from forest condition monitoring and GIS analysis. Boreal Environment Research. In press.

Peltoniemi, M., Markkanen, T., Härkönen, S., Muukkonen, P., Thum, T., Aalto, T. & Mäkelä, A. Consistent estimates of gross primary production of Finnish forests - comparison of estimates of two process models. Boreal Environment Research. In press.

ConclusionsOur results indicate that dry and warm summers may cause an increase in drought-related symptoms in trees. We concluded that the occurrences of drought damage differed spatially, with more drought damage observed in the southern part of the country. The main factor behind this is the higher temperature sum in the south. Additionally, bare rock formations with shallow soil profiles slightly increase the vulnerability to drought. These shallow soil profiles can efficiently narrow down trees’ possibilities to acclimate their root distribution to water acquisition. The TWI confirmed that hill summits are more vulnerable than lower lands in catchment areas. We suggest that the best and the only way to protect against drought is to select the best suitable tree species for each growing site.

AcknowledgementsThis study is part of the EU Life+ project “Climforisk − Climate change induced drought effects on forest growth and vulnerability” (LIFE09 ENV/FI/000571).

ResultsThe growing season 2006 was extremely dry. The SWI was at a normal level in the whole of Finland during the early stages of the growing season in 2006 (Fig. 1), but at the end of the growing season in the same year its value indicated that the conditions were much dryer than normally since the SWIs for July and August 2006 were only 62.2% and 23.6% of the 30-year average, respectively, while those for May and June 2006 were 100% and 97%, respectively.

The binary logistic regression indicated that drought vulnerability can be predicted using variables such as temperature sum, proportion of spruce, proportion of bare rock areas and the TWI. The regression equation is logit(P) = a + bT + cS + dB + eTWI, where T is the temperature sum, S is the share of spruce trees, B is the proportion of bare rock areas and TWI is the topographic wetness index. Vulnerability is the probability (between 0 and 1) of observing drought symptoms in trees during an extreme drought event. The predicted drought vulnerability is highest in southern Finland (Fig. 2).

June 2006 July 2006 August 2006

Drought damage sites

Scaled SWI 0.00 0.40 0.80 1.20

Drought risk55%

0%

Contact: Mikko Peltoniemi, Finnish Forest Research Institute, P.O. Box 18, FI-01301 Vantaa, [email protected]

Drought risk map of Finnish forestsPetteri Muukkonen, Seppo Nevalainen, Martti Lindgren & Mikko Peltoniemi

ffffffffffffffffffffffforesssttt kkkkknnnnooooowwwwwwwwwwlleeeeeeeeeeeddgggggeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee kkkknnooowwwwleeeeddggeeee kknnnnnnowww--hhhhoooooooowwwwwwww knnow-hooooww wwwwwwwweeeeeeeeeellllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll-bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbeeeeeeeeeeiinggggg weelllllllllllll-bbbbbbbbeeeeeinggg