drones ad hoc hearing testimony - baraa shiban

2

Click here to load reader

Upload: kgosztola3278

Post on 10-Nov-2014

26 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Testimony delivered at Congressional Progressive Caucus hearing on drones and oversight for the executive's "targeted killing" authority.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Drones Ad Hoc Hearing Testimony - Baraa Shiban

Congresswoman  Barbara,  thank  you  for  inviting  me  to  speak.  I’m  Baraa  Shiban,  and  I’m  Reprieve’s  Project  Coordinator  in  Yemen  investigating  targeted  killings.    I’m  also  a  Youth  representative  in  Yemen’s  National  Dialogue,  which  I’ll  say  more  about  later.    Today  I  want  to  explain  what  the  secret  air  war  has  meant  to  the  people  of  Yemen,  and  how  that  affects  US  interests.  I  want  to  be  clear:  Yemen  faces  many  challenges,  and  al-­‐Qaida  is  one  of  them.  But  I  firmly  believe  these  airstrikes  are  harming  the  interests  of  both  our  peoples.    You  have  already  heard  that  drones  lead  to  civilian  casualties.    But  that  bland  label  doesn’t  convey  the  magnitude  of  these  mistakes,  or  just  how  damaging  dead  innocents  are  to  the  US’  interests  in  Yemen.    One  reason  the  strikes  harm  US  and  Yemeni  interests  is  that  they  send  the  message  that  US  either  can’t  or  doesn’t  bother  to  sift  friend  from  foe.      Last  summer,  a  strike  in  Khashamir  in  southeast  Yemen  killed  an  anti-­‐al-­‐Qa’ida  imam  Salem  bin  Ali  Jaber,  and  his  21-­‐year-­‐old  nephew  Waleed.      Just  days  before  he  was  killed  the  imam  had  denounced  al-­‐Qa’ida’s  hateful  ideology.      I  spoke  to  the  imam’s  relative  Faisal,  who  said  the  family  had  feared  Salem  might  be  assassinated  by  militants.  They  had  no  idea  he’d  be  killed  by  a  US  drone.    And  while  Salem’s  family  only  want  justice,  others  will  certainly  exploit  this  sad  story  and  persuade  desperate  Yemenis  that  revenge  is  the  only  way.    Another  reason  strikes  are  more  damaging  than  the  US  realizes  is  that,  while  the  US  may  not  be  acknowledging  or  discussing  dead  civilians,  Yemenis  are.        Reprieve  interviewed  several  witnesses  to  the  strike  last  September  on  the  shuttle  between  Sabool  and  Radaa  villages.    At  least  12  civilians  died  in  this  strike.    One  young  farmer  we  spoke  to,  Ahmed,  lost  both  parents  and  his  ten-­‐year-­‐old  sister  in  the  attack.      The  US  government  has  not  investigated  these  deaths.  There  is  no  public  evidence  it  is  even  trying  to  count  them.  But  even  in  a  place  as  poor  as  Radaa,  many  villagers  have  a  camera  phone.    The  farmers  from  Sabool  showed  us  videos  of  people  pulling  charred  bodies  from  the  wreckage.  They  were  scarcely  recognizable.    But  besides  the  horror  of  it  all,  one  thing  struck  me  about  the  footage  I  watched.    In  it,  you  could  see  many  Yemeni  farmers  gathered  around  the  carnage  filming  exactly  the  same  thing.          This  is  how  stories  of  US  injustice  percolate  through  Yemen.  Terrible  images  like  those  I  saw  can  take  on  a  life  of  their  own.  US  aid  reaches  these  areas  rarely,  if  ever.  What  does  the  US  mean  to  these  people  now?  A  blasted  car,  and  gruesome  footage  of  dead  families.        This  is  not  a  pointless  popularity  contest  for  America.  Every  lethal  mistake  the  US  makes  is  kerosene  for  an  insurgency.  And  it  all  comes  at  a  critical  time  for  Yemen.    You  see,  we  Yemenis  are  currently  in  a  National  Dialogue.    Think  of  this  as  a  sort  of  Constitutional  Convention.    This  is  a  process  the  US  supports  to  the  tune  of  millions  of  

Page 2: Drones Ad Hoc Hearing Testimony - Baraa Shiban

dollars.  The  reason  for  this,  of  course,  is  that  the  US  rightly  believes  Yemen’s  stability  is  a  vital  national  security  interest.    But  from  my  many  conversations,  with  witnesses,  families,  government  officials  and  sheikhs,  I  can  say  that  the  secret  air  war  in  Yemen  threatens  to  destroy  this  process.      To  ordinary  Yemenis,  drones  make  a  mockery  of  the  National  Dialogue.  How  can  a  normal  citizen  believe  in  a  gradual  political  process  while  his  village  is  being  hit  by  air  strikes?  How  can  a  Yemeni  buy  in  to  “dialogue”  while  his  children  fear  going  to  school  because  of  drones  hovering  overhead?      In  2011  Yemeni  youth  took  to  the  streets  by  the  thousands  demanding  a  new,  democratic  civil  state.  We  carried  that  spirit  to  the  National  Dialogue.  But  every  strike  on  our  villages  and  cities  drains  this  process  of  legitimacy.  If  the  US  wants  the  Dialogue  to  succeed,  it  has  to  stop  these  self-­‐defeating  strikes.        Sad  to  say,  the  stories  I  told  are  not  the  only  such  stories  in  Yemen.  But  I  am  happy  to  know  that  American  officials  are  starting  to  listen  to  Yemeni  voices.  I  speak  to  you  as  one  of  those  voices.  We  youth  know  we  are  Yemen’s  future.    I  can  earnestly  say  that  we  want  a  positive  relationship  with  the  US.    But  we  also  know  that  this  air  campaign  threatens  the  chance  for  a  stable,  prosperous  Yemen.    I  hope  the  US  will  reconsider  it.    Thank  you  for  your  time.