drilling the solid earth: global geodynamic cycles and earth … · 2017-04-10 · drilling the...

15
1 3 Int J Earth Sci (Geol Rundsch) (2015) 104:1573–1587 DOI 10.1007/s00531-014-1073-y ORIGINAL PAPER Drilling the solid earth: global geodynamic cycles and earth evolution John W. Shervais · Nicholas Arndt · Kathryn M. Goodenough Received: 17 March 2014 / Accepted: 24 August 2014 / Published online: 12 October 2014 © The Author(s) 2014. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com study global geodynamic processes, review past successes in this realm that were sponsored in part by ICDP, and sug- gest potential new targets for drilling campaigns that focus on solid earth evolution. This paper builds on discussions at the 2013 ICDP Science Meeting on the future of continen- tal scientific drilling, held in Potsdam in November 2013. Keywords Global geodynamics · Plate tectonics · Continental scientific drilling · Heat and mass transfer Introduction The geodynamic evolution of Earth began shortly after accretion at 4.57 Ga and continues today. This evolution includes, at its most fundamental level, the physical and chemical fractionation of the Earth, core formation, and outgassing to form the atmosphere and oceans. The geody- namic processes that drive this evolution include some that are truly cyclic, and others that are largely unidirectional (e.g., core formation). The products of these global-scale processes are commonly preserved in the Earth’s crust and in many cases can be studied very effectively through Con- tinental Scientific Drilling (Harms et al. 2007). This paper summarizes discussions of key questions to be addressed in global geodynamics by participants at the ICDP Science Meeting in Potsdam, November 2013, We focus on fundamental research driven by the need to understand how the Earth operates, both at present and throughout geological history. We do not ignore the impor- tance of applied aspects, such as the need to understand earthquakes, predict volcanic eruptions and discover energy and mineral resources, but we anticipate that these are treated elsewhere in this volume. The focus of this paper is thus on the understanding of large-scale Earth processes Abstract The physical and chemical evolution of the Earth is driven by geodynamic cycles that are global in scale, operating over 4.57 Ga of Earth’s history. Some pro- cesses are truly cyclic, e.g., the Wilson Cycle, while oth- ers are irreversible (e.g., core formation). Heat and mass transfer between the lowermost mantle (e.g., core-mantle boundary) and the surface drives these global geodynamic processes. Subduction of lithospheric plates transfers cool fractionated material into the lower mantle and leads indi- rectly to the formation of new oceanic lithosphere, while the rise of thermochemical plumes recycles the remnants of these plates back to the surface, driven by heat transfer across the core–mantle boundary. These global geodynamic cycles are responsible for hotspot volcanism, the formation of continental crust, collisional orogenies, continental rift- ing, subduction zone processes (arcs, accretionary prisms), and ore deposits. Each of these presents opportunities for investigation by continental scientific drilling. In addition, these cycles affect other processes that are targets of conti- nental scientific drilling: the origin and evolution of life and an oxygenated atmosphere, the impact of large volcanic eruptions on climate, and geological hazards such as earth- quakes and volcanic eruptions. In this paper, we present the scientific rationale for continental scientific drilling to J. W. Shervais (*) Department of Geology, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322-4505, USA e-mail: [email protected] N. Arndt ISTerre, University of Grenoble, Grenoble, France K. M. Goodenough British Geological Survey, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3LA, UK

Upload: others

Post on 17-Jul-2020

8 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Drilling the solid earth: global geodynamic cycles and earth … · 2017-04-10 · Drilling the solid earth: global geodynamic cycles and earth evolution John W. Shervais · Nicholas

1 3

Int J Earth Sci (Geol Rundsch) (2015) 104:1573–1587DOI 10.1007/s00531-014-1073-y

ORIGINAL PAPER

Drilling the solid earth: global geodynamic cycles and earth evolution

John W. Shervais · Nicholas Arndt · Kathryn M. Goodenough

Received: 17 March 2014 / Accepted: 24 August 2014 / Published online: 12 October 2014 © The Author(s) 2014. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com

study global geodynamic processes, review past successes in this realm that were sponsored in part by ICDP, and sug-gest potential new targets for drilling campaigns that focus on solid earth evolution. This paper builds on discussions at the 2013 ICDP Science Meeting on the future of continen-tal scientific drilling, held in Potsdam in November 2013.

Keywords Global geodynamics · Plate tectonics · Continental scientific drilling · Heat and mass transfer

Introduction

The geodynamic evolution of Earth began shortly after accretion at 4.57 Ga and continues today. This evolution includes, at its most fundamental level, the physical and chemical fractionation of the Earth, core formation, and outgassing to form the atmosphere and oceans. The geody-namic processes that drive this evolution include some that are truly cyclic, and others that are largely unidirectional (e.g., core formation). The products of these global-scale processes are commonly preserved in the Earth’s crust and in many cases can be studied very effectively through Con-tinental Scientific Drilling (Harms et al. 2007). This paper summarizes discussions of key questions to be addressed in global geodynamics by participants at the ICDP Science Meeting in Potsdam, November 2013,

We focus on fundamental research driven by the need to understand how the Earth operates, both at present and throughout geological history. We do not ignore the impor-tance of applied aspects, such as the need to understand earthquakes, predict volcanic eruptions and discover energy and mineral resources, but we anticipate that these are treated elsewhere in this volume. The focus of this paper is thus on the understanding of large-scale Earth processes

Abstract The physical and chemical evolution of the Earth is driven by geodynamic cycles that are global in scale, operating over 4.57 Ga of Earth’s history. Some pro-cesses are truly cyclic, e.g., the Wilson Cycle, while oth-ers are irreversible (e.g., core formation). Heat and mass transfer between the lowermost mantle (e.g., core-mantle boundary) and the surface drives these global geodynamic processes. Subduction of lithospheric plates transfers cool fractionated material into the lower mantle and leads indi-rectly to the formation of new oceanic lithosphere, while the rise of thermochemical plumes recycles the remnants of these plates back to the surface, driven by heat transfer across the core–mantle boundary. These global geodynamic cycles are responsible for hotspot volcanism, the formation of continental crust, collisional orogenies, continental rift-ing, subduction zone processes (arcs, accretionary prisms), and ore deposits. Each of these presents opportunities for investigation by continental scientific drilling. In addition, these cycles affect other processes that are targets of conti-nental scientific drilling: the origin and evolution of life and an oxygenated atmosphere, the impact of large volcanic eruptions on climate, and geological hazards such as earth-quakes and volcanic eruptions. In this paper, we present the scientific rationale for continental scientific drilling to

J. W. Shervais (*) Department of Geology, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322-4505, USAe-mail: [email protected]

N. Arndt ISTerre, University of Grenoble, Grenoble, France

K. M. Goodenough British Geological Survey, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3LA, UK

Page 2: Drilling the solid earth: global geodynamic cycles and earth … · 2017-04-10 · Drilling the solid earth: global geodynamic cycles and earth evolution John W. Shervais · Nicholas

1574 Int J Earth Sci (Geol Rundsch) (2015) 104:1573–1587

1 3

and secular changes in those processes. A feature that distinguishes most solid Earth projects from others spon-sored by the International Continental Drilling Program (ICDP) is their focus on the deep past, extending from the relatively recent Snake River HOTSPOT project through to mid-Archaean Barberton.

Over-arching themes in solid earth evolution

Two over-arching themes in solid Earth evolution have been identified by ICDP as important areas for future research: global geodynamic cycles, and heat and mass transfer. These themes were recognized, at the ICDP Sci-ence Meeting in 2013, as major focus areas for understand-ing geoprocesses, with implications for societal challenges such as natural hazards, energy and mineral resources, and climate and ecosystem evolution. In this section, we review the major questions that can be addressed by continental scientific drilling within these themes, and identify link-ages with other ICDP themes. This broad review represents a potential starting point from which detailed proposals for specific drilling projects might develop.

Global geodynamic cycles in earth evolution

The solid Earth evolves through geodynamic cycles that operate on a range of timescales. The most fundamental of these is plate tectonics, which continuously forms and destroys oceanic crust, and leads to the growth of conti-nental crust through arc magmatism at convergent plate boundaries. Oceanic crust forms by partial melting of the upper mantle at divergent plate boundaries and is eventu-ally recycled back into the mantle at subduction zones, taking with it the signatures of interaction with the atmos-phere and oceans. Fractionation of trace elements during partial melt extraction and fluid loss from the subducting crust imparts a distinctive geochemical signature to mag-mas generated in subduction zones. These arc magmas not only add new material to continental crust, but also drive formation of many of the ore deposits that are fundamental to modern society. Superimposed on this cycle are mantle plumes, which are discussed below.

Oceanic crust lies in deep water in ocean basins, and only the uppermost part can normally be accessible to dredging: drilling a complete section through the crust is a long-term goal of ocean drilling projects. All of today’s ocean crust is younger than 200 Ma, so efforts to under-stand older ocean crustal processes must seek locations where such crust has been preserved on land as obducted ophiolites. Continental crust, in contrast, is far older, hav-ing first formed as cratonic nuclei in the early Archaean or Hadean, and having continued to grow through time. As a

result, continental crust contains the only accessible record of Earth processes and events prior to 200 Ma, and in many areas, the full length of this record can only be studied by scientific drilling. The processes by which the early conti-nental crust formed are still not well understood and debate continues over the timing of the onset of plate tectonics and over the geodynamic processes that operated in the first part of Earth’s history (e.g., Shervais 2006; Hamilton 2007; Stern 2008). In a modern context, the initiation and development of subduction zones can only be studied in a handful of places; continental scientific drilling offers the opportunity to investigate both active and fossil subduction zones in greater detail.

An important element of the plate tectonics paradigm is the “Wilson Cycle,” which starts with continental rifting and ocean basin formation and is followed by destruction of the ocean basin through subduction, collision, and the re-amal-gamation of continental crustal blocks (Wilson 1966). Colli-sional orogens generate large tracts of metamorphosed crust, including the recently recognized ultra-high-pressure (UHP) metamorphic terranes, which preserve crustal rocks that were subducted to mantle depths before being rapidly trans-ported to the surface (e.g., in the Dabie Shan-Sulu terrane of China: Xu et al. 2009). The most recent example of a con-tinental collision zone, the Himalayan-Karakoram-Alpine orogeny (e.g., Searle 2013), has produced topography that drives enhanced erosion and sedimentation and influences climatic cycles. The Wilson Cycle operates on timescales of several hundred million years, forming “supercontinents” that comprise most of Earth’s continental crust (Murphy and Nance 1992; Nance and Murphy 2013). The Phanerozoic to Neoproterozoic supercontinents of Pangaea, Gondwana, and Rodinia are now relatively well understood, but reconstruc-tions of older supercontinents are still being developed. The changes in continental accretion processes through time, and the effects that the supercontinent cycle had on global climate and the evolution of life, are targets ripe for investi-gation by well-targeted continental scientific drilling projects (Behrman and Yang 2007; Nance and Murphy 2013).

These tectonic cycles link not only to cycles of fluid flow and element transport within the crust, but also to cycling between the atmosphere and hydrosphere and the solid earth. Cycling of water and carbon from the surface into the mantle are notable examples of this process. The deep carbon cycle is inextricably linked to the tectonic cycles mentioned above (e.g., Walter et al. 2011; Dasgupta 2013), and interactions with the atmosphere, hydrosphere, and biosphere have been vital in the origin and evolution of life, and in the generation of fossil fuels. In addition to understanding this natural cycle, we also need to investi-gate how CO2 can be rapidly locked back into the Earth’s crust in the process of carbon capture and storage (Kele-men et al. 2011).

Page 3: Drilling the solid earth: global geodynamic cycles and earth … · 2017-04-10 · Drilling the solid earth: global geodynamic cycles and earth evolution John W. Shervais · Nicholas

1575Int J Earth Sci (Geol Rundsch) (2015) 104:1573–1587

1 3

Equally important are one-way processes such as core formation, the growth of cratonic nuclei in the Archaean, outgassing of the mantle to form the oceans and primitive atmosphere, oxygenation of the atmosphere, and the evo-lution of life, all of which have had profound impacts on the geochemical and geodynamic evolution of Earth. Cata-strophic events such as bolide impacts probably dominated Earth’s evolution throughout the Hadean (based on our knowledge of impact histories of the Moon and telluric planets). Catastrophic impacts have declined in frequency and intensity since the end-Hadean “late heavy bombard-ment,” but, together with major volcanic eruptions, are known to have had a significant effect on Earth’s history and the evolution of life (Simonson et al. 2000; Koeberl 2006; Koeberl and Milkereit 2007).

Mass and heat transfer

The dominant driving mechanisms for global geodynamics are the twin engines of heat and mass transfer: the sinking of cold lithospheric plates at convergent plate boundaries and the rise of thermo-chemical plumes from the lower mantle or the core−mantle boundary (Fig. 1).

The subduction of tectonic plates drives sea-floor spreading, mid-ocean ridge volcanism, arc volcanism, and most surface tectonics, e.g., arc-continent and continent–continent collisions (Carlson et al. 1983; Vigny et al. 1991). The rise of thermo-chemical plumes recycles some of this subducted lithosphere from the lower mantle back to the surface, along with heat from lower mantle and core (Hof-mann and White 1982; Zhong et al. 2000). As these plumes approach the surface, they partially melt to form “hotspots” (DePaolo and Manga 2003). Melting in the heads of start-ing plumes leads to the formation of large igneous prov-inces (LIPs), including oceanic plateaux and continental flood basalts, while the decapitated plume tails form time-transgressive volcanic chains (e.g., ocean island chains and

their continental equivalents; Hill 1991). LIPs play a signif-icant role in mass extinctions and rapid climate change, and the interplay between LIPs and impacts has triggered some of the major tipping points in Earth’s history. The composi-tions of volcanic rocks in LIPs indicate that plumes were more important in the Archaean when the Earth was hotter; they contributed to the formation of greenstone belts, which preserve the sole record of volcanism in this time period, and are commonly associated with Ni, Cu–Zn–Pb, and Au mineralization (Arndt et al. 2012). Plumes also contribute to crustal growth in continents by under-plating magmas and re-enriching continental lithosphere (Hill 1991, 1993).

At a more local scale, the circulation of fluids and mag-mas in the oceanic and continental crust is a vital mecha-nism of heat and mass transfer. These processes are instru-mental in the evolution of the continents and the formation of magmatic and hydrothermal ore deposits, and also in the evolution of the compositions of the atmosphere, hydro-sphere, and biosphere. It is now recognized (e.g., Simmons and Graham 2003) that many geothermal systems repre-sent the surface expression of nascent ore deposits and that both are commonly associated with either subduction-related or plume-related magmatism. Circulation of fluids through the oceanic crust not only generates hydrother-mal ore deposits, but also provides one possible site for the emergence and early evolution of life (e.g., Corliss et al. 1981; Miller and Bada 1988; Nisbet and Sleep 2001), another being terrestrial geothermal systems (e.g., Mulkid-janian et al. 2012). As a result, drilling projects designed to explore volcanic arc or hotspot processes may also serve to investigate geothermal systems, volcanoes, ore deposits, or early life.

Major questions

Fundamental questions related to global geodynamic cycles and heat and mass transfer that can be addressed by

Fig. 1 Schematic diagram depicting transfer of heat and mass between Earth’s surface and the core–mantle boundary, and principal geodynamic set-tings discussed in this paper

Page 4: Drilling the solid earth: global geodynamic cycles and earth … · 2017-04-10 · Drilling the solid earth: global geodynamic cycles and earth evolution John W. Shervais · Nicholas

1576 Int J Earth Sci (Geol Rundsch) (2015) 104:1573–1587

1 3

continental scientific drilling include (but are by no means limited to):

• When did plate tectonics start? And how did it evolve to the modern plate tectonic regime?

• How and at what rate did the continental crust form?• What are the processes by which rifting of continental

crust leads to development of new oceanic crust?• How did the formation and accretion of continental

crust, and the development of supercontinents, influence the formation of major Earth resources?

• How have impacts and major volcanic eruptions affected the evolution of life?

• What were the drivers for the oxygenation of Earth and the evolution of life?

• What are the key controls on element cycling from the hydrosphere, atmosphere and biosphere, into the crust and mantle; and how have these changed over time?

Continental scientific drilling should not solely focus on the recent past by way of shallow boreholes. It is important that the ICDP addresses the full breadth of geological time, including deep time—the Archaean, Proterozoic, and older Phanerozoic—as well as the full spectrum of Earth’s his-tory as it relates to global geodynamics (e.g., Behrman and Yang 2007). The issues discussed here, which bear on the origin and evolution of the solid Earth, are critical if we are to understand how our planet functions and the manner in which it evolved through its entire history. In many cases, the rock record that can be used to answer these questions is buried and dismembered by tectonic processes; continen-tal scientific drilling offers an opportunity to obtain coher-ent sections that complement surface exposures.

Linkages with other themes

In addition to the fundamental questions listed above, global geodynamic cycles and heat and mass transfer link to other themes identified by ICDP as significant areas for future research (e.g., climate and ecosystem evolution, energy and mineral resources, natural hazards, and hidden biosphere). Key linking questions include:

• How does the origin and evolution of life relate to tec-tonic cycles in the Hadean and Archaean?

• How is oxygenation of the Earth and its atmosphere linked to global geotectonic cycles?

• What is the role of impacts and Large Igneous Prov-inces on climate and ecosystem evolution throughout geological time?

• How are mineral resources related to the tectonic and supercontinent cycles, and to Global Oxygenation Events?

• How are energy and mineral resources, including geo-thermal energy, linked to major global geodynamic pro-cesses such as subduction and mantle plumes?

• How are major geodynamic processes such as the growth of mountain chains linked to the evolution of global climate and ecosystems?

• What lessons can we learn about natural hazards through study of plate margin structures, such as faults and subduction zones, in the geological record?

As a result of these linkages, many projects aligned with the general themes of global geodynamics and heat and mass transfer will have impacts on other topics central to continental scientific drilling. Many drilling projects can and should be structured to address multiple questions that cut across nominal theme and discipline boundaries, and involve a broad spectrum of science investigators. This is important because drilling is expensive, and projects that can address multiple themes will win wider support and result in more scientific impact, than projects that are lim-ited to a single issue or theme. Examples of the synergy that results from successful projects with multiple themes include lake-drilling projects that address both climate change and impact processes (Brigham-Grette et al. 2013) and projects that address volcanic processes and geother-mal energy (Shervais et al. 2013a) or magmatic processes and ore formation.

Summary of ICDP successes

Many successful projects addressing questions of global geodynamics and heat and mass transfer have been spon-sored in whole or part by ICDP. These projects, which are profiled on the current ICDP Web site, are listed in Table 1. For convenience, these may be grouped into three broad groups: (1) the geodynamic effects of thermochemical plumes; (2) plate margins; and (3) geodynamic processes in deep time. Each of these groups exhibits linkages with other themes, as discussed above. For example, deep time links to thermochemical plumes and plate margins (both divergent and convergent), as well as passive continental margins.

Geodynamic effects of thermochemical plumes

Continental scientific drilling to explore the geodynamic effects of thermochemical plumes has been discussed in detail at several ICDP, NSF, and ESF sponsored work-shops (e.g., Neal et al. 2008; Walton et al. 2009; DePaolo and Weis 2007; Shervais et al. 2013b). Targets identi-fied by these workshops include large igneous provinces and continental flood basalts, time-transgressive oceanic

Page 5: Drilling the solid earth: global geodynamic cycles and earth … · 2017-04-10 · Drilling the solid earth: global geodynamic cycles and earth evolution John W. Shervais · Nicholas

1577Int J Earth Sci (Geol Rundsch) (2015) 104:1573–1587

1 3

Tabl

e 1

Sum

mar

y of

com

plet

ed I

CD

P pr

ojec

ts r

elat

ed to

glo

bal g

eody

nam

ic c

ycle

s

Titl

eSu

btitl

eTa

rget

Loc

atio

nD

ates

Key

wor

ds

Kol

aK

ola

Supe

rdee

p B

oreh

ole

Upp

er to

mid

dle

cont

inen

tal c

rust

Nor

thea

ster

n Sc

andi

navi

an S

hiel

d,

Rus

sia

69°2

3′N

, 30°

36′E

1970

–199

4 (p

re-I

CD

P)R

ocks

and

min

eral

s at

gre

at d

epth

s an

d on

the

surf

ace,

ore

dep

osits

Win

disc

hesc

henb

ach

Ger

man

Con

tinen

tal D

eep

D

rilli

ng P

rogr

amU

pper

to m

iddl

e co

ntin

enta

l cru

stG

erm

any,

Bav

aria

; 49°

48′5

5.38″N

12

°07′

13.0

1″E

1990

–199

4 (p

re-I

CD

P)C

onve

rgen

t mar

gins

, col

lisio

n zo

nes,

ther

mal

reg

imes

, dee

p bi

osph

ere:

elu

cida

tion

of s

truc

-tu

re a

nd e

volu

tion

of th

e in

teri

or

zone

s in

a f

orm

er m

ount

ain

chai

n

Haw

ai’i

Haw

ai’i

Sci

entifi

c D

rilli

ng P

roje

ct

(HSD

P)M

auna

Kea

Vol

cano

Haw

aii,

USA

; 19°

42′5

2.41″N

, 15

5°3′

15.0

3″W

1999

Geo

chem

ical

and

geo

phys

ical

pr

oces

ses

with

in m

antle

plu

mes

fo

rmin

g “m

idpl

ate”

vol

cano

es

Koo

lau

Roc

k C

orin

g K

oola

u V

olca

noSu

baer

ially

exp

osed

lava

s of

K

oola

u V

olca

noH

awai

’i, U

SA; 2

1°20′3

9.36″N

, 15

7°52′2

2.36″W

Apr

il–M

ay 2

000

Ori

gin

and

evol

utio

n of

the

Haw

aiia

n pl

ume

and

the

man

tle;

enri

ched

man

tle1

endm

embe

r;

deep

man

tle r

ecyc

ling

of c

rust

Don

ghai

Chi

nese

Con

tinen

tal S

cien

tific

Dri

lling

Pro

gram

Dab

ie-S

ulu

UH

PM B

elt

Dab

ie-S

ulu,

Chi

na: 3

4°24′3

6″N

, 11

8°40′1

2″E

2001

–200

5U

ltra-

high

-pre

ssur

e (U

HP)

m

etam

orph

ic b

elt:

conv

erge

nt

mar

gins

, nat

ure

and

timin

g of

m

etam

orph

ism

; exh

umat

ion

of

the

UH

P ro

cks;

flui

d ci

rcul

atio

n an

d m

iner

aliz

atio

n in

the

crus

t an

d up

per

man

tle

Out

okum

puO

utok

umpu

Dee

p D

rilli

ng P

roje

ctPr

oter

ozoi

c gr

eens

tone

bel

tO

utok

umpu

, Fin

land

; 62°

43′4″N

, 29

°3′4

3″E

2004

–200

5O

phio

lites

, Pre

cam

bria

n or

ogen

e-si

s, s

alin

e flu

ids,

ther

mal

reg

imes

, or

e de

posi

ts

Fenn

osca

ndia

Fenn

osca

ndia

Arc

tic R

ussi

a—

Dri

lling

ear

ly e

arth

pro

ject

Prot

eroz

oic

Iman

dra-

Var

zuga

G

reen

ston

e B

elt

Kol

a Pe

nins

ula,

Rus

sia;

68°

N,

36°E

May

–Oct

ober

200

7Pa

laeo

prot

eroz

oic

volc

ano-

sedi

-m

enta

ry s

ucce

ssio

ns; g

enes

is a

nd

timin

g of

the

abru

pt e

stab

lish-

men

t of

the

mod

ern

Ear

th s

yste

m

thro

ugh

earl

y Pa

laeo

prot

eroz

oic

time

Snak

e R

iver

Snak

e R

iver

Sci

entifi

c D

rilli

ng

Proj

ect

Con

tinen

tal v

olca

nics

Snak

e R

iver

Pla

in, U

SA;

42°5

6′18″N

, 115

°21′

18″W

2010

–201

2A

ctiv

e m

antle

plu

me

volc

anis

m

in a

n in

tra-

cont

inen

tal s

ettin

g;

basa

lts, c

limat

e ch

ange

, con

tinen

-ta

l evo

lutio

n, h

ot s

pots

, man

tle

plum

es, t

herm

al r

egim

es

Bar

bert

onB

arbe

rton

Dri

lling

Pro

ject

: Pe

erin

g in

to th

e C

radl

e of

Lif

eA

rcha

ean

gree

nsto

ne b

elt

Bar

bert

on, S

outh

Afr

ica:

25

°54′

25″S

, 31°

6′19″E

2011

–201

2M

id-A

rcha

ean

(3.5

–3.2

Ga)

vo

lcan

ic a

nd s

edim

enta

ry r

ocks

: A

rcha

ean

volc

anic

pro

cess

es;

dyna

mic

s of

Arc

haea

n cr

ust a

nd

man

tle; e

rosi

on a

nd s

edim

enta

-tio

n on

the

earl

y E

arth

, com

posi

-tio

n an

d te

mpe

ratu

re o

f Arc

haea

n se

awat

er

Page 6: Drilling the solid earth: global geodynamic cycles and earth … · 2017-04-10 · Drilling the solid earth: global geodynamic cycles and earth evolution John W. Shervais · Nicholas

1578 Int J Earth Sci (Geol Rundsch) (2015) 104:1573–1587

1 3

island chains, and time-transgressive “hotspot tracks” on continental crust. For this paper, we highlight two recent examples of drilling projects that investigate plume-derived magmatism.

Oceanic plumes: the Hawaii Scientific Drilling Project (HSDP). The Hawaiian Islands represent the classic exam-ple of a time-transgressive oceanic hotspot track, as pro-posed by Wilson (1963). The islands become progressively older from SE to NW and then turn northward to form the Emperor seamount chain, whose ages increase to the north (Sharp and Clague 2006). The change in orientation of the island/seamount chain is thought to represent a profound change in plate motion that occurred with the onset of sub-duction in the Izu-Bonin-Mariana arc system circa 50 Ma (Sharp and Clague 2006).

The HSDP was designed to investigate the evolution of an oceanic plume tail province and, in particular, the con-cept of a compositionally zoned plume (DePaolo et al. 1996; Stolper et al. 2009). This 3,300-m deep hole recov-ered a 0.5 Ma record of volcanism from the two main Hawaiian volcanoes, Mauna Loa (100 Ka) and Mauna Kea (400 Ka). This project produced a wealth of petrological, geochemical, isotopic, and volcanological data that docu-ment the chemical and stratigraphic evolution of these immense volcanoes (Fig. 2). Among the discoveries of this project are a new model for plume-tail structure in the man-tle (Farnetani et al. 2012), a stratigraphic growth model for development of the volcano and its subsidence below sea-level (Stolper et al. 2009), and an immense freshwater aqui-fer (Thomas et al. 2012).

Continental plumes: the Snake River Scientific Drill-ing Project (HOTSPOT). Project Hotspot was designed to explore the impact of deep-seated mantle plumes on con-tinental crust and lithosphere, and the influence of conti-nental lithosphere on plume-derived magmas (Shervais et al. 2013a). The Snake River Plain (SRP) of southern Idaho records the track of the Yellowstone hotspot, a deep-seated mantle plume that has been imaged seismically to depths of over 1,000 km and forms a curtain of hot mantle that pen-etrates the subducting Farallon slab (Obrebski et al. 2010; James et al. 2011). Magmas associated with melting of the plume head erupted under eastern Oregon and Washing-ton circa 17 Ma, forming the Columbia River basalts and related rhyolite eruptive centers under northern Nevada and southwestern Idaho. Magmas associated with melting of the plume-tail form a series of time-transgressive rhyo-lite caldera complexes overlain by a veneer of basalt up to 2 km thick (Shervais et al. 2005). Project Hotspot drilled three ~2-km deep holes in distinct tectonic settings (Fig. 3). The first two holes, located in the central Snake River Plain near Twin Falls, Idaho, form an off-set pair that samples a nearly 4-km thick composite section of rhyolite overlain by basalt. The third hole, located in the western SRP, samples

basalts and sediments found in a major graben that formed contemporaneously with the central–eastern SRP (Shervais et al. 2013a). Preliminary work on the cores from these holes document a continuous history of magmatism over 10 Ma, with massive rhyolite eruptive events followed by cyclic enrichment-fractionation cycles of basaltic magmas, high geothermal gradients, and a magmatic flux consistent with typical LIPs (Shervais et al. 2013a).

Plate margins and crustal geodynamics

There have already been a number of successful projects sponsored in part by ICDP that address crustal geodynam-ics and plate margin processes. The very nature of active plate margins means that most of these proposals are asso-ciated with the International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP) and/or the GeoPRISMS program (Geodynamic Processes at Rifting and Subducting Margins). ICDP has been involved in projects including those aimed at drilling currently active margins and those studying plate margins in the geological record.

Two super-deep holes have been drilled in the continen-tal crust: the 12,262-m deep Kola hole in northern Russia (Kozlovsky 1987) and the 9,101-m deep KTB hole at Wind-ischeschenbach, in southeastern Germany (Emmermann and Lauterjung 1997). The Kola deep drill hole preceded organ-ization of ICDP, while the KTB hole represented its inau-gural effort. Although it could be argued that these projects represented more a technological challenge than a source of scientific data, both provided useful sections through the upper to middle sections of the continental crust.

Many of the active margin projects aim to understand both the processes that take place at plate margins and the natural hazards associated with them. Key examples include the SAFOD (San Andreas Fault Zone Observatory at Depth) and Alpine Fault projects that have drilled into major plate-bounding faults exposed on land. ICDP has also supported IODP programs to drill into active subduc-tion zones, such as those in the Nankai Trough (NanTro-Seize) and Japan trench (J-FAST).

Between 2002 and 2007, the SAFOD project drilled and instrumented an inclined borehole across the San Andreas Fault Zone near Parkfield, California, reaching a depth of 3.2 km. The primary aim of this project was to monitor and study the physical and chemical processes controlling earthquake generation along the fault zone, and the core collected during drilling also provides valuable information on the nature of plate-bounding faults. Cores and geophysi-cal logs show that the San Andreas Fault comprises several discrete, 2–3 m wide, weak, and actively deforming zones, separated by blocks of strong crust (Zoback et al. 2011).

Collisional processes in the geological record are the subject of an ongoing drilling program, the COSC project

Page 7: Drilling the solid earth: global geodynamic cycles and earth … · 2017-04-10 · Drilling the solid earth: global geodynamic cycles and earth evolution John W. Shervais · Nicholas

1579Int J Earth Sci (Geol Rundsch) (2015) 104:1573–1587

1 3

(Collisional Orogeny in the Scandinavian Caledonides), which will aim to provide new information on the pro-cesses operating in continent–continent collision belts. A notable past success for ICDP was the Chinese Continen-tal Scientific Drilling Program, which investigated subduc-tion and exhumation of the continental crust in the Dabie Shan-Sulu ultra-high-pressure terrane of China (Xu et al. 2005, 2009; Liou et al. 2009). This area contains clear evi-dence that continental crustal material was subducted to depths of >150 km during Mesozoic collisional orogenesis. The main borehole for the project was drilled to a depth of 5,158 m, and research on the core has shown that the slab of continental crust was rapidly subducted (4.8–6.1 km/Ma) to ~150 km where it underwent ultra-high-pressure

metamorphism (Fig. 4). Exhumation to the upper crust was equally rapid and accompanied by the development of duc-tile shear zones and crustal melting (Xu et al. 2005, 2009).

Deep time

Two ICDP projects have focused on the first part of Earth’s history. The aim of the FAR-DEEP project in Fennoscan-dian Russia (Melezhik et al. 2013) was to sample volcano-sedimentary sequences that straddled the Great Oxygena-tion Event, the period in the Paleoproterozoic that saw the first major rise in the oxygen abundance of the atmos-phere. A total of 15 cores were drilled at 5 sites, mainly in sedimentary rocks in the Pechenga and Imandra/Varzuga

Fig. 2 Hawaii Scientific Drill-ing Project. Top: bathymetric map of the Hawaiian Islands showing the location of the Hawaiian Drilling Project (from Eakins et al. 2003). Bottom: plots of silica at 13 % MgO and Zr/Y versus depth, from Rhodes and Vollinger 2004. Mauna Loa and Mauna Kea lavas are distinct from one another both chemically and isotopically, and Mauna Kea lavas form five distinct compositional groups

Page 8: Drilling the solid earth: global geodynamic cycles and earth … · 2017-04-10 · Drilling the solid earth: global geodynamic cycles and earth evolution John W. Shervais · Nicholas

1580 Int J Earth Sci (Geol Rundsch) (2015) 104:1573–1587

1 3

greenstone belts and the Onega basin in Karelia (Fig. 5). The three major goals of the project were (1) to obtain a well-characterized, well-dated, and well-archived suc-cession of cores for the period of 2,500–2,000 Ma; (2) to document the changes in the biosphere and the geosphere associated with the rise in atmospheric oxygen; and (3) to develop a self-consistent model to explain the genesis and timing of the establishment of the aerobic Earth System.

The cores provided a record of widespread rifting, some of the earlier global glaciation, an increase of oceanic sulfate, and the formation of some of the oldest known phosphorite and petroleum deposits. Analysis of S, C, and other stable isotopes indicates that the Great Oxidation took place over millions of years, in a series of small events and not as a single pulse.

The second deep time project was subtitled “Peering into the Cradle of Life” (Arndt et al. 2012). Five holes were drilled in the 3.5–3.2 Ga Barberton Greenstone Belt in South Africa, two in ultramafic volcanic rocks (komatiites), and three in sedimentary sequences (Fig. 6). The aims of this project were to understand conditions in the Archaean mantle and the nature of volcanism at that time, the circulation of fluids through the ocean crust, the origin of Archaean sedimentary rocks, and the physical characteristics and chemical composition of Archaean seawater. Study of the volcanic rocks has led to a new model of melting deep in the Archaean mantle; study of chemical sediments has clarified the origin of cherts; multi-isotope investigations help define conditions on the Archaean sea floor. The identification of new biomarkers and proxies provided information on some of the earliest traces of life.

Future

Future targets for continental scientific drilling depend on the significance of the scientific questions being asked, practicality, and the need to drill. Projects related to ther-mochemical plumes, plate margins, volcanic systems, and magma chambers, deep time, crustal geodynamics, and ore deposits all stand out as areas in which signifi-cant progress can be made through continental scientific drilling. Within these themes, some projects will be more attractive than others, based on cost versus anticipated scientific return. This is an area where linkages with other themes and programs become important, because some projects that cannot be justified on the basis of a single issue become attractive targets when they address mul-tiple themes across a range of disciplines. The value of onshore–offshore projects has been emphasized a several workshops over the last 8 years (Neal et al. 2008; Walton et al. 2009; Shervais et al. 2013a), leveraging coopera-tion between IODP, ICDP, and various national funding agencies.

Demonstration of the need to drill is particularly impor-tant. Unlike oceanic drilling when the rocks are otherwise inaccessible on continents, samples can be taken from outcrops, and in such cases, it must be demonstrated that drilling provides material that is not available at the sur-face. In some cases, drilling provides unweathered samples

Fig. 3 Lithologic logs from HOTSPOT: Snake River Scientific Drill-ing Project. Hotspot completed three holes, each almost 2-km deep. The first two core holes comprise an off-set pair that overlap in age, representing some 10 Ma of volcanism. The third hole documents two phases of volcanism separated by a quiescent phase of lake dep-osition during the Pliocene–Pleistocene transition. Over 5,320 m of core was recovered from the three holes (Shervais et al. 2014). Black and white blocks represent basalt, yellow is sediment, blue is rhyolite

Page 9: Drilling the solid earth: global geodynamic cycles and earth … · 2017-04-10 · Drilling the solid earth: global geodynamic cycles and earth evolution John W. Shervais · Nicholas

1581Int J Earth Sci (Geol Rundsch) (2015) 104:1573–1587

1 3

within a precise stratigraphic context that typically cannot be duplicated in outcrop; in others, drilling can provide samples of rocks that are not exposed due to lack of uplift and erosion, or where uplift is accompanied by deforma-tion that masks primary relationships. Each project must be evaluated on its own merits in this regard, and project pro-ponents must clearly establish the need to drill before fund-ing will be approved. A map summarizing potential targets is presented in Fig. 7.

Thermochemical plumes

Thermochemical plumes that form Large Igneous Provinces (LIPs) have been implicated in the breakup of continents and mass extinctions (Courtillot et al. 1986, 1999; Wignall 2001), and may also be responsible for Oceanic Anoxic Events (OAE) (Sinton and Duncan 1997). It has been sug-gested that the long Cretaceous normal magnetic polarity

epoch may be related to a super plume in the SW Pacific Ocean that gave rise to the Ontong Java plateau (Tarduno et al. 1991), and it has recently been established that the deep mantle super plume under Africa is connected to the surface by smaller plumes (Bagley and Nyblade 2013).

There are several potential targets for continental drill-ing of thermochemical plumes. One of the most important is the Deccan Traps (Courtillot et al. 1986), which repre-sent a plume-head LIP that contributed to the Cretaceous–Tertiary mass extinction—it was perhaps the major driver of this extinction, with bolide impact delivering the coup de grace. Combined onshore–offshore drilling (ICDP-IODP) can provide a link between the Deccan continental flood basalts and the currently active plume at Reunion Island (Richards et al. 1989; Neal et al. 2008). Current drilling in the Deccan is targeted at reservoir-induced seismicity, and additional holes may be required to fully sample the Dec-can onshore.

Fig. 4 Lithologic logs from upper 2,000 m of the Dabie Shan main deep drill hole, from 77. Coesite-bearing eclogite, paragneiss, and orthogneiss document deep subduction of continental crust during col-lision of the North and South China cratons

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

500

550

600

650

700

750

800

850

900

950

1000

1000

1050

1100

1150

1200

1250

1300

1350

1400

1450

1500

1500

1550

1600

1650

1700

1750

1800

1850

1900

1950

2000

Dep

th (

m)

Eclogite Retrogressiveeclogite and amphibolite

Paragneiss Orthogneiss Ultramafic rock Coesite-bearinginclusion in zircon

Page 10: Drilling the solid earth: global geodynamic cycles and earth … · 2017-04-10 · Drilling the solid earth: global geodynamic cycles and earth evolution John W. Shervais · Nicholas

1582 Int J Earth Sci (Geol Rundsch) (2015) 104:1573–1587

1 3

Fig. 5 Diagram showing the major paleoenvironmental and tectonic events during the Paleoproterozoic sampled dur-ing the Fennoscandian Arctic Russia drilling project (from Melezhik et al. 2012)

Fig. 6 Left: part of the log of BARB4, cored in the upper sedimentary part of the greenstone belt. This section contains abundant banded iron formations interbedded with chert; right: cores from three holes showing volcanic rocks from BARB1 and two types of sedimentary rock from BARB3 and BARB4

Page 11: Drilling the solid earth: global geodynamic cycles and earth … · 2017-04-10 · Drilling the solid earth: global geodynamic cycles and earth evolution John W. Shervais · Nicholas

1583Int J Earth Sci (Geol Rundsch) (2015) 104:1573–1587

1 3

Other potential targets include the Caribbean Plateau, which formed in the eastern Pacific Ocean then moved into its current location (Kerr et al. 1997; Hoernle et al. 2004), the North Atlantic Igneous Province (which includes Ice-land, the Skaergaard intrusion, Giant’s Causeway, and other features; Saunders et al. 1997), and the Central Atlantic Magmatic Province (CAMP), which is linked to the open-ing of the Central Atlantic Ocean and the breakup of Pan-gaea (Marzoli et al. 1999).

Plate margins and volcanic systems

Subduction zones are among the largest zones of mass transfer on Earth, but the processes by which they initiate and develop can be studied only at a handful of localities

on the Earth’s surface, such as the Izu-Bonin-Mariana arc. Shallow drilling on the volcanic islands can investigate the volcanic architecture of these arcs; deeper holes may also sample plutonic and metamorphic rocks of the middle to lower crust (Behrman and Yang 2007). Island arcs are an ideal setting for combined ICDP-IODP land–sea drilling campaigns.

Analogs for developing subduction zones exist around the world in ophiolites, slabs of ocean crust, and uppermost mantle preserved on continental margins (Shervais 2001; Stern et al. 2012; Ishizuka et al. 2014). Drilling in a well-exposed ophiolite potentially provides an unrivaled three-dimensional understanding of processes at oceanic ridges, the tectonic emplacement mechanisms of ophiolites at convergent boundaries, and the development of subduction

Fig. 7 World map showing a selection of past or current ICDP suc-cesses (letters), and potential future projects (numbered). Past/cur-rent: SAFOD San Andreas Fault Observatory at Depth, Nan Nankai Trough, JF J-Fast, Alp Alpine Fault, HSDP Hawaii Drilling Project, SRP Snake River Plain (Hotspot), IDDP Iceland Deep Drilling Pro-ject, KTB German Deep Borehole, Kola Russian Deep Borehole, FAR FAR-DEEP, COSC Scandinavian Caledonides, Dabie Dabie Shan-Sulu UHP, Barb Barberton Greenstone belt, CF Campi Flegrei, Unz

Unzen, Mut Mutnovsky. Potential Future ICDP Targets: 1 Plumes; 1a Deccan (onshore/offshore); 1b North Atlantic Igneous Province; 1c Caribbean Plateau; 1d CAMP; 1e Kerguelen; 2 Plate Margins; 2a IBM Islands, Chichijima; 2b Talkeetna arc; 2c Agean Arc; 3 Ophi-olites 3a Oman; 3b Josephine; 3c Bay of Islands. 4 Crustal Geody-namics. 4a Hellenides; 4b Franciscan complex; 4c Qilian Mountains; 4d Alleghanian orogeny. 5 Deep Time. 5a Pilbara; 5b Canadian shield; 5c Sudbury complex; 5d Bushveld complex

Page 12: Drilling the solid earth: global geodynamic cycles and earth … · 2017-04-10 · Drilling the solid earth: global geodynamic cycles and earth evolution John W. Shervais · Nicholas

1584 Int J Earth Sci (Geol Rundsch) (2015) 104:1573–1587

1 3

zones. In particular, the way in which magmas move through the lower crust and upper mantle above a subduc-tion zone can be studied in detail and linked to the chemi-cal composition of those magmas. Such drilling would also offer opportunities for understanding the cycling of ele-ments between the hydrosphere and lithosphere above sub-duction zones. Linkages with IODP drilling above active subduction zones offer the way forward to a truly com-prehensive understanding of this aspect of Earth’s tectonic cycle.

Subduction zones are not the only localities at which magma chamber processes can be usefully studied by continental drilling; large-scale magmatism within the continents, formed in continental rifts and above plumes, also offers excellent targets. The Bushveld complex is the Earth’s largest mafic–ultramafic intrusion, compris-ing lower units of olivine and pyroxene cumulates grading upward into gabbro and diorite. It is also the source of more than 75 % of the world’s resources of chrome and plati-num-group elements. Despite more than a century of inves-tigation by petrologists and economic geologists, many aspects of the complex remain poorly understood. The pet-rological and geochemical characteristics of rocks from the complex provide a record of melting in an abnormally hot part of the mantle, probably a plume, and of strong inter-action between magma and rocks of the continental crust. Yet it is not known how these magmas migrated through the crust, how they evolved into magmas of diverse compo-sitions that were injected into the intrusion, and especially why the magmas were trapped within the crust instead of erupting at the surface as in other large igneous provinces.

Crustal geodynamics

Mountain building events (orogenies) are some of the most significant episodes in Earth’s history because they typi-cally record continent–continent or continent-arc collisions that result in the amalgamation cratons and the uplift of mountain belts that affect everything from erosion rates to thermal regimes in the crust and mantle. The discovery of ultra-high-pressure metamorphic assemblages in many continental orogens demonstrated that buoyant continen-tal crust can be subducted to mantle depths and exhumed over relatively short geologic timescales (Chopin 2003). The anatomy and evolution of fossil orogens are important because they record changes in these processes through time and allow us to see the internal architecture of the oro-genic collage, which is commonly not exposed in young, active orogens. This strategy was central to the Dabie Shan-Sulu ultra-high-pressure terrane drilling in China, and it could provide a road map for similar projects in other major orogenic belts. Current and potential future targets include the Alleghanian orogen in the eastern USA, and the

Qilian Mountains of western China, which may represent an extension of the Dabie Shan-Sulu UHP belt (Behrman and Yang 2007).

A more ambitious goal would be sampling a continu-ous section through the lower part of the continental crust, although such a hole would cost the equivalent of several times the annual ICDP budget. Sound scientific goals would need to be defined, and it would have to be demonstrated that the possibility of obtaining in situ samples, as opposed to those offered in crustal xenoliths and granulite massifs, would be worth the investment. Other potential targets for scientific drilling are accretionary complexes formed above subduction zones, seaward of the volcanic arcs. The archi-tecture of accretionary wedges and their relationship to the formation and exhumation of high-pressure and ultra-high-pressure rocks from depth, in the absence of terrane col-lisions, is still poorly understood (Maruyama et al. 1996). Competing models such as corner flow (Cloos 1982, 1984) and tectonic denudation (Plate 1986, 1993) have yet to be resolved, and the conditions under which each of these models may prevail are not established. Potential targets include the Franciscan complex of California (USA) and the “Hellenic Collision Factory” of the eastern Mediterra-nean, highlighted by Behrman and Yang (2007).

Deep time

The success of the Far-Deep and Barberton projects (Melezhik et al. 2013; Arndt et al. 2012) illustrates the value of shallow, stratigraphy-controlled drilling in Pre-cambrian regions. The principal attraction of such drill-ing stems from the possibility of obtaining (1) complete sections of rocks that normally are poorly exposed at the surface, and (2) samples of rocks that are not subject to surface-related alteration and weathering that obscures or destroys many of the petrographic, geochemical, and bio-chemical proxies that record conditions at the surface of the planet during the Precambrian. Drilling projects of this type yield invaluable information on secular changes in the compositions and physical conditions of the mantle, crust, and surface envelopes (atmosphere, oceans), and on the links between internal geodynamics and surface pro-cesses, and oxygenization and evolution of life. Possible target areas include the Pilbara region in Australia, where a sequence of drilling projects has already gone ahead (Buick 2010) without support from ICDP and various parts of the Canadian shield, where well-preserved but poorly exposed volcano-sedimentary sequences are common.

A time of particular interest to be addressed by scien-tific drilling is the Neoproterozoic Era, the time of forma-tion and break-up of the Rodinia supercontinent. This era was characterized by major climate change and global-scale glaciations, a possible second global oxygenation

Page 13: Drilling the solid earth: global geodynamic cycles and earth … · 2017-04-10 · Drilling the solid earth: global geodynamic cycles and earth evolution John W. Shervais · Nicholas

1585Int J Earth Sci (Geol Rundsch) (2015) 104:1573–1587

1 3

event marked by a pulse of banded iron formation deposi-tion, and the rapid diversification of life on Earth. Drilling of Neoproterozoic targets will underpin assessment of the interlinkages between super continental tectonics, climate change, oxygenation of the Earth and evolution of life at a key juncture in the Earth’s history.

Ore deposits

The growing need to supply metals to meet current demand justifies scientific drilling designed to understand how min-eral deposits form and how new deposits might be found. Increasing worldwide demand has meant that most major deposits in easily accessible regions and in near-surface settings have been discovered (Australian Academy of Sci-ence 2012). To supply the metals needed by future genera-tions will require that buried deposits are located, and this will require considerable improvement of geological, geo-chemical, and geophysical exploration methods. One major justification for scientific drilling is the need to calibrate such methods both in regions of known mineralization and in regions known to be sterile.

Currently, a major mineral exploration company like Rio Tinto or Anglo American drills in a single week the amount of core that ICDP drills in a year (G. Chunnett, pers comm 2013). It might then be argued that this drilling should to able to provide all the core and test facilities needed to develop and improve exploration methods. The problem is that most industry drilling consists either of greenfields exploration in regions where the geological context and mineralization potential is unknown, or targeted drilling designed to prove the extent of mineralization surrounding known ore depos-its. What is needed are dedicated projects in which academia and industry collaborate to define specific goals of interest to both groups. If such collaboration can be achieved, it is reasonable to expect that the costs would be shared between ICDP and government agencies and industry.

Obvious targets for such drilling are the large-layered intrusions that host magmatic ore deposits such as Bush-veld in South Africa and Sudbury in Canada (Cawthorn 1996). Although the broad elements of the origin of the mineral deposits in these intrusive complexes are under-stood, the processes that triggered their crystallization remain obscure. In both cases, the scientific goals would extend to petrological issues and, in the case of Sudbury, to the consequences of meteorite impact (French 1967). Other targets of interest to both academia and industry are alkaline igneous intrusions that host potential depos-its of “critical metals” such as rare earth elements; grani-toid intrusions, as outlined in the “drill to magma” project; and banded iron formations, which provide a record of the Great Oxidation event and the proto-ore of major iron deposits.

Summary

Continental Scientific Drilling has a major part to play in continued development of the knowledge based on geodynamic cycles and heat and mass transfer within the Earth. Recent projects have studied a range of questions, from early evolution of life and the oxygenation of Earth, to the processes operating at the present time in active fault zones and above mantle plumes. Future ICDP pro-jects are likely to link processes in the deep Earth and in deep time with applied themes such as natural hazards or the search for resources. Such links may be very direct (e.g., drilling into major layered igneous intrusions to study igneous features and the processes by which ore-bearing layers formed) or may be more subtle (e.g., drill-ing ophiolites to understand processes at modern subduc-tion zones).

These themes have been discussed at length in previous ICDP science plans (DePaolo and Weis 2007; Behrman and Yang 2007) but progress toward fulfilling these investiga-tions has been halting. If we are to realize the goals set for-ward here, it is critical that the solid earth science commu-nity maintains a focus on how continental scientific drilling can be used to study these themes and that ICDP maintains global geodynamic cycles as a central component of the international drilling planning process.

Acknowledgments This paper is the product of discussions with several participants in the ICDP Science Meeting held at Potsdam in November 2013. We are grateful to ICDP for support to attend this workshop. KG publishes with the permission of the Executive Direc-tor of the British Geological Survey.

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Crea-tive Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribu-tion, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.

References

Arndt NT, Wilson A, Hofmann A, Mason P, Bau M, Byerly G, Chun-nett G (2012) Peering into the cradle of life: scientific drilling in the Barberton Greenstone Belt. Scientific Drilling 13:71

Australian Academy of Science (2012) Searching the deep earth: the future of Australian resource discovery and utilization. Australian Academy of Science, Canberra. ISBN 978 0 85847 288 4

Bagley B, Nyblade NA (2013) Seismic anisotropy in eastern Africa, mantle flow, and the African superplume. Geophys Res Lett 40:1500–1505

Behrman JH, Yang J (2007) Convergent Plate Boundaries and Colli-sion Zones. In: Harms U, Koeberl C, Zoback MH (eds) Continen-tal scientific drilling: a decade of progress, and challenges for the future. Springer, Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg, pp 289–335

Brigham-Grette J, Melles M, Minyuk P, Andreev A, Tarasov P, DeConto R, Koenig S, Nowaczyk N, Wennrich V, Rosen P, Haltia-Hovi E, Cook T, Gebhardt T, Meyer-Jacob C, Snyder J, Herzschuh U (2013) Pliocene warmth, polar amplification, and

Page 14: Drilling the solid earth: global geodynamic cycles and earth … · 2017-04-10 · Drilling the solid earth: global geodynamic cycles and earth evolution John W. Shervais · Nicholas

1586 Int J Earth Sci (Geol Rundsch) (2015) 104:1573–1587

1 3

stepped pleistocene cooling recorded in NE Arctic Russia. Sci-ence 340:1421–1427

Buick R (2010) Deep-time drilling in the Australian Archean: the Agouron Institute geobiological drilling project. AGU abstract, 2010

Carlson RL, Hilde TWC, Uyeda S (1983) The driving mechanism of plate tectonics: relation to age of the lithosphere at trenches. Geo-phys Res Lett 10:297–300

Cawthorn RG (ed) (1996) Layered intrusions. Elsevier, AmsterdamChopin C (2003) Ultrahigh-pressure metamorphism: tracing con-

tinental crust into the mantle. Earth Planet Sci Lett 212:1–14. doi:10.1016/S0012-821X(03)00261-9

Cloos M (1982) Flow melanges: numerical modelling and geologic constraints on their origin in the Franciscan subduction complex, California. In: Raymond LA (ed) Melanges: their nature, origin, and significance. Bull Geol Soc Am 93: 330–345

Cloos M (1984) Flow melanges and the structural evolution of accre-tionary wedges. Geol Soc Am Spec Pap 198:71–79

Corliss JB, Baross JA, Hoffmann SE (1981) An hypothesis concern-ing the relationship between submarine hot springs and the origin of life on earth. Oceanol Acta 4:59–69

Courtillot V, Besse J, Vandamme D, Montigny R, Jeagger JJ, Cappetta H (1986) Deccan flood basalts at the cretaceous/tertiary bound-ary? Earth Planet Sci Lett 80:361–374

Courtillot V, Jaupart C, Manighetti I, Tapponnier P, Besse J (1999) On causal links between flood basalts and continental breakup. Earth Planet Sci Lett 166:177–195

Dasgupta R (2013) Ingassing, storage, and outgassing of terrestrial of carbon through geologic time. Rev Mineral 75:183–229

DePaolo DJ, Manga M (2003) Deep origin of hotspots: the mantle plume model. Science 300:920–921

DePaolo DJ, Weis D (2007) Hotspot volcanoes and large igneous provinces. In: Harms U, Koeberl C, Zoback MD (eds) Continen-tal scientific drilling: a decade of progress and challenges for the future. Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg, pp 259–288

DePaolo DJ, Stolper EM, Thomas DM et al (1996) The Hawaii Scien-tific Drilling project: summary of preliminary results. GSA Today 6(8):1–8

Eakins BW, Robinson JE, Kanamatsu T, Naka J, Smith JR, Takahashi E, Clague DA (2003) Hawaii’s volcanoes revealed: U.S. Geologi-cal Survey Geologic Investigations Series Map I-2809, 1 plate, http://pubs.usgs.gov/imap/2809/)

Emmermann R, Lauterjung J (1997) The German continental deep drilling program KTB: overview and major results. J Geophys Res: Solid Earth 102:18179–18201

Farnetani CG, Hofmann AW, Class C (2012) How double volcanic chains sample geochemical anomalies from the lowermost man-tle. Earth Planet Sci Lett 298:240–247

French BM (1967) Sudbury structure, Ontario: some petrographic evidence for origin by meteorite impact. Science 156:1094–1098

Hamilton WB (2007) Earth’s first two billion years: the era of inter-nally mobile crust. In: Hatcher RD Jr., Carlson MP, McBride JH, Martínez Catalán JR (eds.), 4-D Framework of continental crust: geological society of America Memoir 200, p. 233–296

Harms U, Koeberl C, Zoback MD (2007) Continental scientific drill-ing: a decade of progress, and challenges for the future. Springer Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg

Hill RI (1991) Starting plumes and continental breakup. Earth Planet Sci Lett 104:398–416

Hill RI (1993) Mantle plumes and continental tectonics. Lithos 30:193–206

Hoernle K, Hauff F, van den Bogaard P (2004) 70 m.y. history (139–69 Ma) for the caribbean large igneous province. Geology 32:697–700

Hofmann AW, White WM (1982) Mantle plumes from ancient oce-anic crust. Earth Planet Sci Lett 57:421–436

Ishizuka O, Tani K, Reagan MK (2014) Izu-Bonin-Mariana forearc crust as a modern ophiolite analogue. Elements 10:115–120

James DE, Fouch MJ, Carlson RW, Roth JB (2011) Slab fragmenta-tion, edge flow and the origin of the Yellowstone hotspot track. Earth Planet Sci Lett 311:124–135

Kelemen PB, Streit L, Matter J, Rudge J, Curry W, Blusztajn J (2011) Rates and mechanisms of peridotite carbonation: preliminary data from Oman, recipes for enhanced, in situ CO2 capture and stor-age, and avenues for continued research. Ann Rev Earth Planet Sci 39:545–576. doi:10.1146/annurev-earth-092010-152509

Kerr AC, Tarney J, Marriner GF, Nivia A, Saunders AD (1997) The Caribbean–Colombian cretaceous igneous province: the internal anatomy of an oceanic plateau. In: Mahoney JJ, Coffin MF (eds) Large igneous provinces: continental, oceanic and planetary flood volcanism. AGU, Washington

Koeberl C (2006) The record of impact processes on the early earth: a review of the first 2.5 billion years. Geol Soc Am Spec Pap 405:1–22. doi:10.1130/2006.2405(01

Koeberl C, Milkereit B (2007) Continental drilling and the study of impact craters and processes: an ICDP perspective. pp. 95–161 In: Harms U, Koeberl C, Zoback MD Continental scientific drill-ing. Springer Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg

Kozlovsky YA (1987) The superdeep well of the Kola Peninsula. Springer Verlag, Berlin

Liou JG, Ernst WG, Zhang RY, Tsujimori T, Jahn BM (2009) Ultrahigh-pressure minerals and metamorphic terranes: the view from China. J Asian Earth Sci 35:199–231. doi:10.1016/j.jseaes.2008.10.012

Maruyama S, Liou JG, Terabayashi M (1996) Blueschists and eclog-ites of the world and their exhumation. Int Geol Rev 38:490–596

Marzoli A, Renne PR, Piccirillo EM, Ernesto M, Bellieni G, De Min A (1999) Extensive 200-million-year-old continental flood basalts of the central Atlantic magmatic province. Science 284:616–618

Melezhik VA, Prave AR, Fallick AE, Kump LR, Strauss H, Lepland A, Hanski EJ (eds) (2012) Reading the archive of earth’s oxygen-ation. Volume 1: The Palaeoproterozoic of Fennoscandia as Con-text for the Fennoscandian Arctic Russia—Drilling Earth Project. Frontiers in earth sciences. Springer, Berlin

Melezhik V, Prave AR, Fallick AE, Kump LR, Strauss H, Lepland A, Hanski EJ (2013) Reading the archive of earth’s oxygenation. Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg, vol 1, 491 pp

Miller SL, Bada JL (1988) Submarine hot springs and the origin of life. Nature 334:609–611. doi:10.1038/334609a0

Mulkidjanian AY, Bychkov AY, Dibrova DV, Galperin MY, Eugene V, Koonin EV (2012) Origin of first cells at terrestrial, anoxic geothermal fields. PNAS 109(14):E821–E830. doi:10.1073/pnas.1117774109

Murphy JB, Nance RD (1992) Mountain belts and the supercontinent cycle. Sci Am 266:84–91

Nance RD, Murphy JB (2013) Origins of the supercontinent cycle. Geosci Front 4(4):439–448. doi:10.1016/j.gsf.2012.12.007

Neal CR, Coffin MF, Arndt NT, Duncan RA, Eldholm O, ErbA E, Farnetani C, Fitton JG, Ingle SP, Ohkouchi N, Rampino MR, Reichow MK, Self S, Tatsumi Y (2008) Investigating large igne-ous province formation and associated paleoenvironmental events: a white paper for scientific drilling. Sci Drill 6:4–18

Nisbet EG, Sleep N (2001) The habitat and nature of early life. Nature 409:1083–1091

Obrebski M, Allen RM, Xue M, Hung S-H (2010) Slab-plume interaction beneath the Pacific Northwest. Geophys Res Lett 37:L14305. doi:10.1029/2010GL043489

Platt JP (1986) Dynamics of orogenic wedge and the uplift of high-pressure metamorphic rocks. Bull Geol Soc Am 97:1037–1053

Platt JP (1993) Exhumation of high pressure rocks: a review of con-cepts and processes. Terra Nova 5:119–133

Page 15: Drilling the solid earth: global geodynamic cycles and earth … · 2017-04-10 · Drilling the solid earth: global geodynamic cycles and earth evolution John W. Shervais · Nicholas

1587Int J Earth Sci (Geol Rundsch) (2015) 104:1573–1587

1 3

Rhodes JM, Vollinger MJ (2004) Composition of basaltic lavas sam-pled by phase-2 of the Hawaii Scientific Drilling Project: geo-chemical stratigraphy and magma types. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 5:Q03G13. doi:10.1029/2002GC000434

Richards MA, Duncan RA, Courtillot VE (1989) Flood basalts and hotspot tracks: plume heads and tails. Science 246:103–107

Saunders AD, Fitton JG, Kerr AC, Norry MJ, Kent RW (1997) The North Atlantic Igneous Province. In: Mahoney JJ, Coffin MF (eds) Large igneous provinces: continental, oceanic and planetary flood volcanism. Am Geophysal Union, Washington, pp 95–122

Searle M (2013) Colliding continents: a geological exploration of the Himalaya, Karakoram, and Tibet. Oxford University Press, Oxford 464 pp

Sharp WD, Clague DA (2006) 50-Ma initiation of hawaiian-emperor bend records major change in pacific plate motion. Science 313:1281–1284

Shervais JW (2001) Birth, death, and resurrection: the life cycle of suprasubduction zone ophiolites. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 2. doi:10.1029/2000GC000080

Shervais JW (2006) Significance of subduction-related accretionary complexes in early earth processes. In: Reimold WU, Gibson RL (eds) Early earth processes, geological society of America, Spe-cial Paper 405: 173–192

Shervais JW, Kauffman JD, Gillerman VS, Othberg KL, Vetter SK, Hobson VR, Zarnetske M, Cooke MF, Matthews SH, Hanan BB (2005) Basaltic volcanism of the central and western Snake River plain: a guide to field relations between twin falls and mountain Home, Idaho. In: Pederson J, Dehler CM (eds) Guide to Field trips in the western United States, Field Guide Volume 6. Geo-logical Society of America, Boulder Co, 26 pp

Shervais JW, Schmitt DR, Nielson DL, Evans JP, Christiansen EH, Morgan L, Shanks WCP, Lachmar T, Liberty LM, Blackwell DD, Glen JM, Champion D, Potter KE, Kessler JA (2013a) First results from HOTSPOT: the Snake River Plain Scientific Drill-ing Project, Idaho, USA. Scientific Drilling 15. doi:10.2204/iodp.sd.15.06.2013

Shervais JW, Evans JP, Clark A, Eichelberger JC, Kirkpatrick J, Toy V (2013b) White papers: drilling active tectonics and magmatism (Volcanics, Geoprisms, and Fault Zones Post-SAFOD): Geology Faculty Publications. Paper 386. http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/geology_facpub/386

Shervais JW, Evans JP, Schmitt D, Christiansen EH, Alexander Prokopenko A (2014) HOTSPOT: the snake river scientific drilling project. EOS Trans Am Geophys Union 95(10):85–86. doi:10.1002/2014EO100001

Simmons SF, Graham I (2003) Volcanic, geothermal, and ore-forming fluids: rulers and witnesses of processes within the earth. Spec Publ Soc Econ Geol 10:354. doi:10.5382/SP.10

Simonson, BM, Koeberl, C., McDonald, I. and Reimold, WU (2000). Geochemical evidence for an impact origin for a Late Archean spherule layer, Transvaal Supergroup, South Africa. Geology, v28, 1103-1106. doi:10.1130/0091-7613(2000)28<1103:GEFAIO>2.0.CO;2

Sinton CW, Duncan RA (1997) Potential links between ocean plateau volcanism and global ocean anoxia at the Cenomanian–Turonian boundary. Econ Geol 92:836–842

Stern RJ (2008) Modern-style plate tectonics began in neoproterozoic time: an alternative interpretation of earth’s tectonic history. In: Condie K, Pease V (eds) When did plate tectonics begin? Geol Soc Am Spec Pap 440: 265–280

Stern RJ, Reagan M, Ishizuka O, Ohara Y, Whattam S (2012) To understand subduction initiation, study forearc crust: to under-stand forearc crust, study ophiolites. Lithosphere 4:469–483

Stolper EM, DePaolo DJ, Thomas DM (2009) Deep drilling into a mantle plume volcano, the Hawaii Scientific drilling project. Sci Drill 7:4–14

Tarduno JA, Sliter WV, Kroenke L, Leckie M, Mayer H, Mahoney JJ, Musgrave R, Storey M, Winterer EL (1991) Rapid formation of Ontong Java plateau by Aptian mantle plume volcanism. Science 254:399–403

Thomas DM, Paillet FL, Conrad ME (2012) Hydrogeology of the Hawaii Scientific Drilling Project borehole KP-1: 2. Groundwa-ter geochemistry and regional flow patterns. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 101(B5):11683–11694

Vigny C, Ricard Y, Froidevaux C (1991) The driving mechanism of plate-tectonics. Tectonophysics 187:345–360

Walter MJ, Kohn SC, Araujo D, Bulanova GP, Smith CB, Gaillou E, Wang J, Steele A, Shirey SB (2011) Deep mantle cycling of oce-anic crust: evidence from diamonds and their mineral inclusions. Science 334:54–57

Walton AW, Clyde W, Colman S, Hickman S, Koeberl C, Miller KH, Shervais JW (2009) The future of continental scientific drilling: a U.S. perspective. DOSECC Workshop Publication #1: Proceed-ings of a workshop held June 4-5, 2009, Denver, Colorado

Wignall PB (2001) Large igneous provinces and mass extinctions. Earth Sci Rev 53:1–33

Wilson JT (1963) A possible origin of the Hawaiian Islands. Can J Phys 41:863–870

Wilson JT (1966) Did the Atlantic close and then re-open? Nature 211:676–681

Xu Z, Yang J, Robinson PT (2005) Deep drilling in the Dabie-Sulu Ultrahigh Pressure Metamorphic Belt, China, Eos, v86, No. 8, 77–78

Xu Z, Yang W, Ji S, Zhang Z, Yang J, Wang Q, Tang Z (2009) Deep root of a continent–continent collision belt: evidence from the Chinese Continental Scientific Drilling (CCSD) deep borehole in the Sulu ultrahigh-pressure (HP-UHP) metamorphic terrane, China. Tectonophysics 475:204–219

Zhong S, Zuber M, Moresi L, Gurnis M (2000) Role of temperature- dependent viscosity and surface plates in spherical shell models of mantle convection. J Geophys Res 105:11063–11082. doi:10.1029/2000JB900003

Zoback M, Hickman S, Ellsworth W (2011) Scientific drilling into the San Andreas fault zone: an overview of SAFOD’s first 5 years. Sci DrilL 11:14–28