dragger vent
DESCRIPTION
Dragger ventTRANSCRIPT
Volume-Targeted Ventilation in
Newborn Respiratory Support
Martin Keszler, MD
Professor of Pediatrics
Brown University
Women and Infants Hospital
Providence, RI
Ventilatory Support in Neonatology:
State-of-the-Art 2011
PSV ?
??
??
?
Outline of Lecture:
Basic Concepts of Mechanical
Ventilation and Lung Injury
Pros-cons of Volume vs. Pressure
Volume -Targeted vs. Volume-
Controlled Ventilation
Evidence base for VG
Practical aspects of VG ventilation
Unique Challenges in NB Ventilation Children ≠ Small Adults!
Newborns ≠ Small Children!
Transitional circulation
Compliant chest wall, stiff lungs
Unfavorable chest wall mechanics
Limited muscle strength and endurance
Immature respiratory control
Rapid RR, short time constants
Small trachea, high ETT resistance
Uncuffed ETT
Location of flow sensor
Need for a specialty Neonatal Ventilator
Volume or Pressure Ventilation?
Bourns LS104 BP 200
Volume vs. Pressure Ventilation Volume Ventilation
- Controls the set flow rate
- Cycles when set volume is delivered
- Pressure rises passively
Pressure Ventilation - Controls the set pressure
- Cycles when set time or flow is
reached
- Volume depends on compliance
Volume vs. Pressure Ventilation Volume Ventilation
- Controls the set flow rate
- Cycles when set volume is delivered
- Pressure rises passively
Pressure Ventilation - Controls the set pressure
- Cycles when set time or flow is
reached
- Volume depends on compliance
Pressure-limited IMV
Patient Patient
Spont.
breath
Continuous flow Continuous flow
Pressure
limit
Expiration Inspiration
Leak
PEEP
valve
Limitations of Volume - Controlled Ventilation in Newborns
Tubing System and Humidifier
Respiratory
System
VTLung = VT set CT
CRS
1
1 + *
Actual tidal volume is influenced by:
1) Ratio of circuit compliance to
respiratory system compliance
Flow Sensor
C T V .
Vent
V .
CRS
Humid
C RS
2) compressible volume of the circuit, including humidifier
Leak
Why Volume-Targeted
Ventilation?
Volutrauma not Barotrauma
Inadvertent hyperventilation is common (Luyt
2001)
Hypocarbia is bad for the brain and the lungs
Adult-type volume controlled ventilation
doesn’t work well in NB
Effect of Pressure v. Volume on Lung Injury Hernandez, et al, J Appl Physiol 1989
Capillary
filtration
coefficient:
measure of
acute lung
injury
Dreyfuss D et al. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1988;137:1159-1164.
10
8
6
4
2
0
Qwl/BW
(mL/kg)
DLW/BW
(g/kg)
Albumin space
(%)
* * 1.2
0.9
0.6
0.3
0
100
0
80
60
40
20
Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury:
Volutrauma, not Barotrauma
Rodents ventilated
with 3 modes:
- High pressure
(45 cm H2O),
high volume
- Low (negative)
pressure, high
volume
- High pressure
(45 cm H2O), low
volume (strapped
chest & abdomen) *P<0.01.
*
PIP is Excessive Relative to Compliance!
!
P
VT
FRC
E
I
!!
Hypocarbia in First 3 Days of Life Proportion of infants with PaCO2 < 25 mm Hg
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
IMV
PTV
Luyt, et al 2001
Both High and Low PCO2 Increase Risk of IVH Fabres, et al, Pediatrics 2007
Modalities of Volume -Targeted Ventilation
Controls Adjusts Based on
Servo (PRVC) VT to circuit PIP Inspiratory VT
of last breath
VIP Bird (VAPS) Minimum VT
to patient Inspiratory time ( )
Inspiratory VT
Bear Cub 750 (Volume Limit)
Max. VT to patient
Inspiratory time ( )
Inspiratory VT
Avea (VAPS + VL)
Min/Max VT
to circuit/pt Inspiratory time ( )
Inspiratory VT
P. Bennett 840 (Volume Vent +)
VT to circuit Inspiratory time / flow
Inspiratory VT
Babylog 8000+ & VN 500 (VG)
VT to patient
PIP Exhaled VT of
last breath
Comparison between ventilator and Bicore CP-100
Tidal Volume Measurement Chow, et al, Pediatr Pulmonol 2002
PRVC/VG Control Algorithm
Volume Limit
PRESSURE
FLOW
VOLUME
Volume Limit
Pressure limited breaths
Volume limited breath
Decreased
compliance
or decreased
patient effort
Increased compliance or increased patient effort
Volume Limit
Volume Guarantee Principles of Operation
Pressure limit Working Pressure
VT = VT set by user
The PIP (“working
pressure”) is servo-
regulated within preset
limits (“pressure limit”)
to achieve VT that is
set by the user.
Regulation of PIP is in
response to exhaled VT
to minimize artifact
due to ETT leak.
Breath terminates if
130% of TVT reached.
Separate algorithm for
spontaneous and
machine breaths.
Working Pressure
VOLUME
Target tidal volume
Pressure Limit
PRESSURE
Benefits of VG
Maintenance of (relatively) constant tidal volumes / avoidance of hypocapnia
Prevention of overdistention and volutrauma due to
• Surfactant administration
• Lung volume recruitment
• Clearance of lung fluid
Automatic lowering of pressure support level during weaning – weans in “real-time”
Compensation for variable respiratory drive
• stabilization of tidal volume and minute ventilation due to changes of respiratory drive (periodic breathing)
The benefits of VTV can not be
realized without ensuring that the
tidal volume is evenly distributed
throughout an “open lung”!!!
Expiration
Inspiration Ventilated
Stable
Ventilated
Unstable Unventilated
“Atelectotrauma”
Non-Homogenous Aeration in RDS Recruitment/ de-
recruitment injury
Shear
forces
Adequate PIP, Adequate PEEP
COP CCP
FRC
P
V
VT
P
Good oxygenation, low FiO2, minimal lung injury
CCP = critical closing pressure; COP = critical opening pressure
OLC Prevents Lung Injury
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
VT>6/kg PaCO2<35
A/C
A/C+VG
* *
Proportion of Values Outside the
Target Range
Keszler, et al. Ped Pulmonol ‘04 * p < 0.001
Spontaneous Hyperventilation and VG
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
PIP
PIP limit
PEEP
VT
Set VT
Breath #
PIP (cm H2O) VT (ml)
Note the large VT, generated by the infant, while the PIP
drops near the PEEP level as the ventilator in VG mode
responds appropriately to the large VT by reducing PIP.
VG Combined with A/C v. SIMV
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
VT variance SpO2 variance
A/C + VG
SIMV + VG
* P < 0.001
*
*
Variance of VT and SpO2
Abubakar, et al, J Perinatol 2005
VG Combined with A/C v. SIMV Ventilator Variables – Mechanical Breaths
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
PIP MAP VT MV (L/min x
10)
A/C + VG
SIMV + VG
# P < 0.005
#
#
Abubakar, et al, J Perinatol 2005
Lung Volume
Patient’s
Pleural
Pressure
Machine
Generated
Pressure
Lung Volume
SIMV vs. A/Cor PSV: Work of Breathing and VT
CPAP/SIMV (unsupported) A/C or PSV
Machine
Generated
Pressure
Patient’s
Pleural
Pressure
Lung Volume
SIMV (supported)
Patient’s
Pleural
Pressure
Machine
Generated
Pressure
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
ml/
kg
SIMV SIMV+PS3 SIMV SIMV+PS6
VT SIMV VT spont
SIMV: Uneven VT (Osorio, et al. J Perinat Apr 05)
VG Combined with A/C v. SIMV Cardio-Respiratory Variables
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
HR RR SpO2
A/C + VG
SIMV + VG
*
*
*
* P < 0.001 Abubakar,et al, J Perinatol 2005
VG vs NAVA or PAV
Extreme Periodic Breathing Owen, et al, ADC 2010
Cochrane Review: Duration of MV Wheeler, et al 2010
Cochrane Review: Death or BPD @ 36 wk Wheeler, et al 2010
Cochrane Review: Pneumothorax Wheeler, et al 2010
Effect of VG on Markers of Lung Inflammation Lista, et al 2005 & 2006
Two prospective randomized trials
A/C vs. A/C + VG
BAL on days 1,3,5
VG @ 5 mL/kg reduced pro-
inflammatory cytokine levels and
decreased duration of ventilation
VG @ 3 mL/kg increased pro-
inflammatory cytokine levels
Low PEEP (3-4 cm H2O)
Summary of VG Studies
When compared to PLV, VG results in:
Same or lower PIP 1,2,3
More stable VT 1,3
Less hypocapnia 3
Faster recovery from forced exhalation episodes3
Works better with A/C than SIMV 4
Faster recovery from suctioning 4
Pro-inflammatory cytokines decreased @ 5 ml/kg5
Faster weaning from mechanical ventilation5
Higher VT needed in RLBW* infants 6
Higher VT needed with advancing post-natal age 3
1 Herrera et al, 2 Cheema, et al, 3 Keszler, et al, 4 Abubakar, et al, 5 Lista, et al
6 Montazami, et al * RLBW = Ridiculously low birth weight infant (<600g)
VG-Clinical Guidelines Initiation
VG should be implemented immediately upon initiation of mechanical ventilation.
The usual starting target VT is 4 - 5 mL/kg during the acute phase of the illness.
Use corrected VT if ETT leak (VN 500)
Larger VT is needed with SIMV, in ELBW infants, those with MAS and older infants with BPD!
PIP limit should be set 20% above the PIP currently needed to deliver the target VT in order to give the device adequate room to adjust PIP.
Record both the PIP limit and the working pressure.
VT in infants with MAS Sharma, et al ESPR 2011
Relationship of Birthweight and VT
Montazami,et al, Ped Pulmonol 2009
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
6.5
0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9
Weight (kg)
VT
(m
l/k
g)
R= -0.563 p<0.001
ELBW RLBW *
*RLBW = Ridiculously LBW
Conventional Physiology Anatomical dead-space = 2mL/kg. Instrumental dead-space is fixed.
Anatomical + Instrumental dead-space = 3mL in a typical 1 kg infant
Anatomical + Instrumental dead-space = 2.5mL in a typical 0.5 kg infant
Alveolar ventilation = tidal volume – dead-space volume) x RR
VT = 5mL , DS=3mL VT = 4mL , DS=3mL VT = 3mL , DS=3mL
Alveolar ventilation = X Alveolar ventilation
= 0.5 X
Alveolar ventilation
= 0
Time to Eliminate CO2 from Test Lung 2.5 mm ETT, DS = 3.5 ml
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
DS + 2 DS+ 1 DS DS -0.5 DS - 1 DS -1.5Tidal Volume (ml)
Seconds
Keszler, et al. ADC FN in print (Published Online 18 November 2011)
Fresh gas inflow spikes through DS gas
Mixing when flow abruptly stops
Exhaled gas spikes through mixed DS gas
Gas Flow Through Narrow ETT
Henderson’s Experiment 1915
Relationship of Post-Natal
Age and VT (mL/Kg)
Keszler,et al, Arch Dis Child ‘09
Day 1-2
n = 251
Day 5-7
n = 185
Day 14-17
n = 216
Day 18-21
n = 176
VT (mL/kg) 5.15 + 0.6 5.24 + 0.7 5.63 + 1.0 6.07 + 1.4
PCO2 (torr) 44.0 + 5.4 46.3 + 5.2 53.9 + 7.3 53.9 + 6.2
MV and Anatomical Dead Space
in ELBW Infants
As gas is delivered under pressure to the newborn lung, the airway expands in proportion to its compliance.1
Over time, elasticity is lost and airway becomes larger than normal.
Preterm infants who are mechanically ventilated have larger tracheal widths than nonventilated neonates (Figure)2
1. Greenspan JS, et al. Neonatal Netw. 2006;25:159-166.
2. Bhutani VK, et al. Am J Dis Child. 1986;140:449-452.
750 1,000 1,250 1,500
Study Weight, g
Tra
chea
l Wid
th, m
m
0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
Ventilated
Non-ventilated
VG Clinical Guidelines: Subsequent Adjustments
Adjustment to target VT may be made, based on
PaCO2. Usual increment is 0.5 mL/kg.
PIP limit needs to be adjusted from time to time to
keep the PIP limit close to the actual PIP.
PIP will default to the limit if sensor is out or when
giving a manual breath!
Consider light sedation if infant is agitated despite
good support
Pay attention to alarms, graphics (beware of leaks)!
If the low VT alarm sounds repeatedly, increase the
pressure limit AND INVESTIGATE THE CAUSE
VG Clinical Guidelines: Weaning
If target VT is set at low normal (usually ~4 mL/kg in first few days, higher later on) and PaCO2 is allowed to rise to the mid - high 40s (pH <7.35), weaning occurs automatically (“self-weaning”). Avoid VT <4 mL/kg.
If VT is set too high and/or the pH is too high, the baby will not have a respiratory drive and will not “self-wean”.
Avoid sedation during the weaning phase!
If significant oxygen requirement persists, PEEP may need to be increased to maintain mean airway pressure as PIP is automatically lowered.
Most infants can be extubated when they consistently maintain VT at or above the target value with working PIP < 10-12 cm H2O (< 12-15 cm H2O in infants > 1 kg) with FiO2 < 0.35 and good sustained respiratory effort.
Work of Breathing @ Different VT target Patel, et al Pediatrics 2009
VG-SIMV: Minute Ventilation Herrera, et al, Pediatr 2002
0
50
100
150
200
250
SIMV SIMV+VG4.5 SIMV+VG3
Total
Mech
Spont
ml/kg/min
Troubleshooting
There will be more alarms (interactive mode, gives useful information, pay attention to it)
Avoid excessive alarms (they get ignored!
Common causes: - Limits are too tight (most often pressure limit)
- Excessive ETT leak (change ETT if leak > 40% (Much less of a problem with the VN 500)
- Forced exhalation episodes
- Agitation • Excessive noise
• handling
• lack of boundaries
Thank You