draft proposed public transportation routes for waterville, me

1
Points of Interest Points of Interest Points of Interest Points of Interest Proposed Public Transportation Route for Waterville, Maine 16.32 3.4 South 27.22 5.6 West 15.36 3.2 North Time (min) Distance (Mi.) Route 16.32 3.4 South 24.24 5.1 West 12.48 2.6 North Time (min) Distance (Mi.) Route KMD Medical Offices Wal-Mart Shaw's Plaza Seton Hospital Hannaford and K-Mart Plaza Inland Hospital Colby College Corner of Drummond and Armory JFK Plaza Thayer Hospital Corner of Drummond and Oak Corner of Summer and Grove Alfond Youth Center Post Office Hub Hub Hub South Route West Route North Route Introduction: There is a significant population of residents in Waterville who also work in the city. Most of these residents walk to their workplace and around town, which takes a great deal of effort and time on their part. Other residents drive themselves around town, which adds traffic, carbon emissions, and has other negative impacts on the township. Currently, there is a public bus transportation route. However, it is not effective enough to meet the needs of the population. The city of Waterville and our research team hope to find where a route for public transportation system would run in order to optimize ridership and efficiency. Ridership in this situation refers to the amount of peoples who would best benefit from an efficient public transportation system. Methods: We used Network Analyst to find the optimal routes in the city. The Network Analyst tool calculates optimal routes, using existing street data, based on the input of stops, barriers, and impedances. Population density was manipulated as an impedance to run the tool. Ridership needed to be identified. To show the areas in Waterville that would most benefit from a public transportation system, certain data needed to be taken into consideration. We initially wanted to use population density and land parcel size to evaluate ridership throughout the city, but this data was not compatible with Network Analyst. Our research team decided that, based on census data provided by City Hall and discussions with city officials, high population density would be equated with an area of high ridership. Consequently, the population data needed to be attributed to the road layer. A detailed explanation of the creation of the Street Population Density (StreetsDen) and the creation of the geodatabase and network dataset with which Network Analyst was run can be found in Figure 1. Points of interest were derived based on more discussions with the city officials, which constituted the stops. Three different groups of points of interest were created into the North, West, and South routes. Network Analyst was then run for each of the designated routes. Results: Population Density – As suspected the population density for the year 2000 was higher in the Downtown, Southern, and Northern areas. Street Density – By intersecting the population density by block and the roads layers, the new StreetsDen layer accurately shows the population densities on the roads layer. Routes – Two different sets of routes were found: one with the shortest length between the selected stops and one that favored higher population density. All six routes created did not run a complete loop. Rather, once the final stop was reached, we propose that the bus should turn around and follow the same path back to the hub, as advised by the city consultant. As suspected, the three routes based on street density run longer and the three routes based on length followed had a more direct path to the final point of interest. Total time of each route was found based on the assumption by the city officials that all roads are 25 mph. Discussion: Difficulties – Our first plan was to unionize the parcel size layer with the population density data. We attempted to standardize the data, and weight the two attributes differently in order to emphasize population density over land parcel size and were eventually able to create an adequate union of the two attributes (we called this “ridership”). However, when we tried intersecting the roads with the new ridership, the population and parcel size data had blank areas that were the roads within the city. The intersect tool could not be used properly since there were no data values attributed to these areas. While the roads overlapped the population and parcel size data in some sections, the resulting intersect showed us bits and pieces of the overall road system that we had intended to create. Our final method rejected the land parcel size data in favor of population density to derive ridership. Our largest problem, now, has to do with map projections. As our metadata Works Cited/References: Data provided by: ESRI (street and census data). Projection: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 19N (Points of Interest, Streets Network Dataset) NAD 1983 State Plane Maine West (Dataframe) NAD 1927 State Plane West (TIF images) GCS North American 83 (Street Density, Population by Block) This project referenced a previous analysis entitled: “Revitalizing Transportation in Waterville” by Carrie Curtis, Michelle Easton, Brett McNeice, and J. David White in SO255, Spring 2007, T. Morrione. Tom Crikelair Associates. Review of Waterville Public Transportation. 9/27/07 Background photo from: www.rapidtransit-press.com A special thanks to Manuel Gimond: GIS and Quantitative Analysis Specialist Research Scientist, Environmental Studies, Colby College, and Philip Nyhus: Assistant Professor of Environmental Studies, Colby College. Thanks as well to Ann Beverage, Greg Brown, Paul Castonguay, and the Waterville City Hall for their cooperation. We also acknowledge the Oak Foundation for its generous contributions to our department. Frederick Freudenberger and Michelle Presby ES212: Introduction to GIS and Remote Sensing Environmental Studies, Colby College Spring 2008 Fig 1. Creating the Geodatabase and Network Dataset New Feature Dataset Import: Feature Class (Single)… chose StreetsDen and Junctions New Network Dataset: Selected roads and junctions Connectivity: Used Any Vertex option instead of End Point Add New Attribute: PopdenImp, usage type: cost, data type: double Evaluators: Type=field, Value=PopdenImp Creation of Network Dataset: Built the model New File Geodatabase Within roads data folder Creation of Street Population Density Layer ESRI Area, Population, and Population Density by Block data Population Density by Block standardized to create a Population Density Impedance (PopDenImp) column 1 - - X i X min X max X min - Where min=0 and max=0.0314 Resulting PopDenImp range: 0.686 - 1 Intersect Tool: Input – PopDenImp, streets layer, street junctions Output - line Run Intersect Tool: Street Density (StreetsDen) layer created Standardization Formula: Density by Block calculated manually Conclusions – Our analysis shows ideal public transportation routes for the city of Waterville based on population density. We acknowledge that this is not a complete plan for a public transportation system, only what we have concluded to be the optimal routes. If we were to improve on this study, we would include revised street data that recognized speed limits, one-way streets, and feasibility of bus maneuverability. We hope that this study will be helpful in implementing a future public transportation system that could serve the peoples of Waterville. notes, three different projections were used. Even though there was a discrepancy in the data, ArcMap was able to project all layers in a congruent manner. After a failed attempt at manually re-projecting all data layers to the same coordinate system, we judged this attempt superfluous and accepted ArcMap’s method as sufficient. Recognitions regarding routes – We discovered that a key road was missing in the data that connects the hub to an adjacent street. We were able to edit the roads layer to reflect reality so that ArcMap now recognizes this and has analyzed accordingly. However, other important roads are also missing in the data. For our map, this means that some stops on our routes do not reach the points of interest because the street data did not exists for all roads. We would like to note these so that we may acknowledge any time discrepancies between our analysis and potential reality: Wal-Mart, JFK, Plaza, and Hannaford and K-Mart Plaza. Also, we would like to note that we have not included waits at stops in our proposed route times.

Upload: others

Post on 04-Oct-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Points of InterestPoints of InterestPoints of InterestPoints of Interest

Proposed Public Transportation Route for Waterville, Maine

16.323.4South

27.225.6West

15.363.2North

Time (min)Distance (Mi.)Route

16.323.4South

24.245.1West

12.482.6North

Time (min)Distance (Mi.)Route

KMD Medical OfficesWal-Mart

Shaw's Plaza Seton HospitalHannaford and K-Mart Plaza

Inland HospitalColby CollegeCorner of Drummond and Armory

JFK PlazaThayer HospitalCorner of Drummond and Oak

Corner of Summer and GroveAlfond Youth CenterPost Office

HubHubHub

South RouteWest RouteNorth Route

Introduction:There is a significant population of residents in

Waterville who also work in the city. Most of these residents walk to their workplace and around town, which takes a great deal of effort and time on their part. Other residents drive themselves around town, which adds traffic, carbon emissions, and has other negative impacts on the township. Currently, there is a public bus transportation route. However, it is not effective enough to meet the needs of the population. The city of Waterville and our research team hope to find where a route for public transportation system would run in order to optimize ridership and efficiency. Ridership in this situation refers to the amount of peoples who would best benefit from an efficient public transportation system.

Methods:We used Network Analyst to find the optimal routes in the city. The Network Analyst tool calculates optimal routes, using existing street data, based on the input of stops, barriers, and impedances. Population density was manipulated as an impedance to run the tool.

Ridership needed to be identified. To show the areas in Waterville that would most benefit from a public transportation system, certain data needed to be taken into consideration. We initially wanted to use population density and land parcel size to evaluate ridership throughout the city, but this data was not compatible with Network Analyst. Our research team decided that, based on census data provided by City Hall and discussions with city officials, high population density would be equated with an area of high ridership. Consequently, the population data needed to be attributed to the road layer. A detailed explanation of the creation of the Street Population Density (StreetsDen) and the creation of the geodatabase and network dataset with which Network Analyst was run can be found in Figure 1.

Points of interest were derived based on more discussions with the city officials, which constituted the stops. Three different groups of points of interest were created into the North, West, and South routes. Network Analyst was then run for each of the designated routes.

Results:Population Density – As suspected the population density for the year 2000 was higher in the Downtown, Southern, and Northern areas.

Street Density – By intersecting the population density by block and the roads layers, the new StreetsDen layer accurately shows the population densities on the roads layer.

Routes – Two different sets of routes were found: one with the shortest length between the selected stops and one that favored higher population density. All six routes created did not run a complete loop. Rather, once the final stop was reached, we propose that the bus should turn around and follow the same path back to the hub, as advised by the city consultant. As suspected, the three routes based on street density run longer and the three routes based on length followed had a more direct path to the final point of interest. Total time of each route was found based on the assumption by the city officials that all roads are 25 mph.

Discussion:Difficulties – Our first plan was to unionize the parcel size

layer with the population density data. We attempted to standardize the data, and weight the two attributes differently in order to emphasize population density over land parcel size and were eventually able to create an adequate union of the two attributes (we called this “ridership”).

However, when we tried intersecting the roads with the new ridership, the population and parcel size data had blank areas that were the roads within the city. The intersect tool could not be used properly since there were no data values attributed to these areas. While the roads overlapped the population and parcel size data in some sections, the resulting intersect showed us bits and pieces of the overall road system that we had intended to create. Our final method rejected the land parcel size data in favor of population density to derive ridership. Our largest problem, now, has to do with map projections. As our metadata

Works Cited/References:Data provided by: ESRI (street and census data).Projection: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 19N (Points of Interest, Streets Network Dataset)NAD 1983 State Plane Maine West (Dataframe)NAD 1927 State Plane West (TIF images)GCS North American 83 (Street Density, Population by Block)This project referenced a previous analysis entitled: “Revitalizing Transportation in Waterville” by Carrie Curtis, Michelle Easton, Brett McNeice, and J. David White in SO255, Spring 2007, T. Morrione.Tom Crikelair Associates. Review of Waterville Public Transportation. 9/27/07Background photo from: www.rapidtransit-press.com

A special thanks to Manuel Gimond: GIS and Quantitative Analysis Specialist Research Scientist, Environmental Studies, Colby College, and Philip Nyhus: Assistant Professor of Environmental Studies, Colby College.Thanks as well to Ann Beverage, Greg Brown, Paul Castonguay, and the Waterville City Hall for their cooperation. We also acknowledge the Oak Foundation for its generous contributions to our department.

Frederick Freudenberger and Michelle PresbyES212: Introduction to GIS and Remote Sensing

Environmental Studies, Colby CollegeSpring 2008

Fig 1. Creating the Geodatabaseand Network Dataset

New Feature Dataset

Import:Feature Class

(Single)… chose StreetsDen

and Junctions

New Network Dataset:

Selected roads and junctions

Connectivity:Used Any Vertex option instead of

End Point

Add New Attribute:

PopdenImp, usage type: cost, data

type: double

Evaluators:Type=field,

Value=PopdenImp

Creation of Network Dataset:Built the model

New File GeodatabaseWithin roads data folder

Creation of Street Population Density Layer

ESRI Area, Population, and

Population Density by Block data

Population Density by Block standardized to create a Population Density Impedance

(PopDenImp) column

1 --Xi Xmin

Xmax Xmin-

Where min=0 and max=0.0314

Resulting PopDenImprange: 0.686 - 1

Intersect Tool:Input – PopDenImp, streets layer, street

junctionsOutput - line

Run Intersect Tool:Street Density

(StreetsDen) layer created

Standardization Formula:

Density by Block calculated manually

Conclusions – Our analysis shows ideal public transportation routes for the city of Waterville based on population density. We acknowledge that this is not a complete plan for a public transportation system, only what we have concluded to be the optimal routes. If we were to improve on this study, we would include revised street data that recognized speed limits, one-way streets, and feasibility of bus maneuverability.

We hope that this study will be helpful in implementing a future public transportation system that could serve the peoples of Waterville.

notes, three different projections were used. Even though there was a discrepancy in the data, ArcMap was able to project all layers in a congruent manner. After a failed attempt at manually re-projecting all data layers to the same coordinate system, we judged this attempt superfluous and accepted ArcMap’s method as sufficient.

Recognitions regarding routes – We discovered that a key road was missing in the data that connects the hub to an adjacent street. We were able to edit the roads layer to reflect reality so that ArcMapnow recognizes this and has analyzed accordingly. However, otherimportant roads are also missing in the data. For our map, this means that some stops on our routes do not reach the points of interest because the street data did not exists for all roads. We would like to note these so that we may acknowledge any time discrepancies between our analysis and potential reality: Wal-Mart, JFK, Plaza, and Hannaford and K-Mart Plaza. Also, we would like to note that we have not included waits at stops in our proposed route times.