dr. york chow chairperson equal opportunities commission hong kong 23 july 2013 women’s equal...
TRANSCRIPT
Dr. York CHOW
ChairpersonEqual Opportunities Commission
Hong Kong
23 July 2013
Women’s Equal Opportunities
– The Hong Kong
Experience 1
Historical Review (I)
Before 1960s:
women were mostly family carers.
1960s:
Creation of a vast amount of blue-collar and white-collar job opportunities;
Higher education level, simpler family structure, and better employment opportunities and economic prospects also encouraged more women to participate in economic activities.
1970s:
The Government started to provide 6-year free basic education to local boys and girls in 1971 and the free education was extended to a period of 9 years in 1978.;
In 1975, female civil servants began to enjoy equal pay as their male counterparts.
2
Historical Review (II)
1980s and 1990s: Legislation was passed for paid maternity leave; the enactment of the former Domestic Violence Ordinance; the passage of the Inland Revenue (Amendment) Ordinance, which provided for separate taxation for married women; the right for female indigenous villagers to inherit land in the New Territories in the absence of a will; the enactment of the Sex Discrimination Ordinance and the establishment of the Equal Opportunities Commission.
Extension of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) to Hong Kong.
21st Century:Since the 1980s, local women’s groups have been advocating the establishment of a central mechanism on women’s affairs. The Government set up Women’s Commission on 15 January 2001.
3
Legal Protection against Sex Discrimination
The Basic LawThe Hong Kong Bill of Rights OrdinanceInternational Covenant on Civil and Political
Rights (ICCPR)International Covenant on Economic, Social and
Cultural Rights (ICESCR)Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of
Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW)Sex Discrimination Ordinance (SDO)Family Status Discrimination Ordinance (FSDO)
4
Birth of the Sex Discrimination Ordinance
Sexual Discrimination Ordinance – a private initiative
Ms Anna Wu, the then legislative councillor , introduced the Equal Opportunities Bill (EOB) in the form of a Private Member’s Bill in the Legislative Council of Hong Kong in 1994.
Outlawing discrimination on various grounds including sex, disability, family responsibility, sexuality, age, race, religious, etc. Under pressure, the Government agreed to introduce
legislation against sex and disability discrimination (the Sex Discrimination Bill and Disability Discrimination Bill).
The Sex Discrimination Ordinance was passed in 1995.
5
The Sex Discrimination Ordinance (SDO)
Outlaw discrimination on the basis of sex, marital status and pregnancy, and sexual harassment;
Examples: Cannot dismiss or transfer a pregnant woman into a lower paying
position; Unlawful for an employer to discriminate against a job applicant on
the basis of sex unless if a person's sex is a genuine occupational qualification for the job.
Applies to both males and females;Code of Practice on employment under the SDO;
Provides for the establishment of the Equal Opportunities Commission (EOC).
6
Enquiries & Complaints related to Sex Discrimination
Sex Discrimination Ordinance Related Enquiries & Complaints
An average of 87% of the complaints related to sex discrimination are made lodged by women for the past three and a half years.
An average of 94% of sexual harassment complaints are raised by women from January 2010 to June 2013.
2010 2011 2012 2013 (Jan-June)
No. of SDO related enquiries
822 878 1045 604
No. of SDO related complaints
303 262 282 110
No. of pregnancy discrimination complaints
150 130 97 43
No. of sexual harassment complaints
83 64 115 43
8
Family Status Discrimination Ordinance
Passed in 1997.
Unlawful for anyone or any organisation to discriminate against a person, male or female, on the basis of family status.
Applies to the same seven areas as what the SDO covers .
Example: An employer CANNOT turn down an employee’s promotion
or transfer him/her because of his/her family status, e.g. after knowing that the employee is the only carer of his/her young son at home .
9
The Equal Opportunities Commission
A statutory body established under the SDO on 20 May 1996.
Commenced operation on 20 September 1996.Independent of the Government .S63(7) of the SDO: the EOC “shall not be
regarded as a servant, or agent of the Government” .
Accountable to the public .Governed by a Board comprising of a full-time
Chairperson and 16 members from different backgrounds .
10
What the EOC has done to achieve
Women’s Equal Opportunities
Elimination of Discriminatory Advertisements;
Remove the gender-based discriminatory elements in the Secondary School Places Allocation (SSPA) System;
Eliminate Gender Stereotyping in Textbooks;Cracking the Dress Code Combating Pregnancy Discrimination; andEliminate Sexual Harassment.
14
Discriminatory Advertisements
Unlawful to publish discriminatory Advertisements under the discrimination ordinances in HK, including the SDO and the FSDO.
(i) Education and publicity:
The EOC regularly monitor recruitment advertisements and work closely with publishers, advertisers and employment agencies;
(ii) Legal proceedings The EOC has power under the discrimination ordinances to bring
legal proceedings against publishers and advertisers.
In the year 1997/98, the EOC has taken court action on 18 advertisements appearing in 5 newspapers and fines were imposed.
(iii) Significant drop in discriminatory advertisements: December 1996 -- 37% advertisements in print media were
discriminatory; March 1998 – Less than 1%.
15
Fostering Fairer Access to Education
Secondary School Places Allocation (SSPA) System A System used by the Education Department to allocate places for
Primary 6 students into Secondary Schools since 1978.
Formal Investigation The EOC received complaints. Formal investigation by the EOC into
SSPA System started in September; The SSPA System was discriminatory on the basis of sex in 3 areas:
a. the scaling of internal assessment scores using separate gender curves;
b. the banding of students by sex; and
c. the sex quotas for placement in co-educational secondary schools. The SSPA system led to systematic scaling down of the best girls’
scores and scaling up the best boys’ scores which restricted girls’ access to the best schools.
The EOC recommended: the Government should develop an allocation system without any discriminatory elements to ensure that boys and girls are placed into secondary schools fairly.
16
Fostering Fairer Access to Education
Judicial Review of the SSPA System
August 1999 – The EOC investigation report found that the SSPA system discriminatory;
April 2000 – The Education Department (ED) said that there were good reasons to keep the SSPA System as it was;
July 2000 – The EOC applied to the court for judicial review of the SSPA System;
June 2001 -- The High Court ruled that all three gender-based mechanisms in the SSPA System challenged by the EOC are discriminatory and unlawful under the SDO;
July 2001 – The ED introduced relief measures to place affected students;
2002 – The ED removed the 3 gender-based features of the SSPA System with effect from the 2002 allocation.
17
Gender Stereotyping in Textbooks
Content analysis on textbooks and teaching materials in respect of stereotyping was conducted in late 1999;
Examined nearly 70,000 references to human characters and interviewed students, teachers and publishers;
Analysis showed: Female characters occurred less often than male; Reinforced traditional family roles with the father working
and contributing to society with achievers tending to be male, while mothers stayed at home; and
There was only one mention of single parenthood. The study also prepared a set of guidelines for the
development of education materials;and Teacher and publishers agreed that guidelines would be a
useful reference in avoiding stereotypes in educational materials.
18
Cracking the Dress Code
2010 The EOC granted legal assistance to a complainant who alleged that she was discriminated against by the school on the ground of her sex by imposing on her a dress code under which all female teachers were required to wear a dress or a skirt to work, and eventually she was pressurized to resign;
The case raises a question of sex discrimination in the field of employment; and
After a writ was issued by the EOC, the school agreed to settle the matter giving an apology and monetary payment to the complainant. The school also undertook to review its dress code.
19
Eliminate Pregnancy Discrimination
1. Resignation under pressure is a dismissal: February 2001 – the Court ruled that the
employer discriminated against the plaintiff because of her pregnancy, and that she was victimized after she had lodged a complaint with the EOC.
The ruling made it clear that a resignation under pressure would be treated as constructive dismissal.
2. Set precedent by awarding damages in a pregnancy discrimination case:
May 2003 – The Court held that an elderly home unlawfully discriminated against a pregnant woman by refusing to employ her as a supervisor.
The Court awarded damages of 3 different components: Loss of income; Injury to feelings; and Punitive damages.
20
Eliminate Sexual Harassment
Court case: In 2010, an employer was held by the Court that it was vicariously
liable for employee’s act of sexual harassment as it did not take reasonable practicable steps to prevent sexual harassment in the workplace.
Damages of HK$80,000 was awarded to the complainant.
Surveys in 2011 and 2013: An EOC survey on the Students’ Sexual Attitudes and Views on Sexual
Harassment found that 50% of the responded students experienced various forms of sexual harassment during the past one year.
An EOC questionnaire survey found that 47% of the 321 respondents said that their schools have not yet adopted any sexual harassment policy.
Seminars: The EOC held 4 seminars in early July to promote the formulation of a
comprehensive and effective sexual harassment policy in schools; more than 800 school principals, vice-principals and senior teachers attended.
21
Women in the Labour Force
Labour Force and Labour Force Participation Rates of Hong Kong (LFPRs) by Sex
Source: Census and Statistics Department
Male Female
Period Number (’000)
LFPR (%) Number (’000)
LFPR (%)
1982 1 600.3 81.3 897.8 47.5
1987 1 727.5 80.3 1000.7 48.7
1992 1 766.0 78.1 1026.3 46.3
1997 1 954.9 75.1 1279.9 47.9
2002 1 958.1 72.4 1514.5 51.9
2007 1 953.6 70.4 1668.7 53.1
2012 1 972.1 68.7 1813.1 53.6
22
Educational Attainment
Number of Female Students in University Grants Committee-Funded Programmes (Excluding Sub-degree programmes)
Source: Women’s Commission
Women’s Population in Hong Kong (Foreign Domestic Helper Excluded)
Source: Census and Statistics Department
Sex 1986/87 1991/92 1996/97 2001/02 2006/07 2010/11
Female 6,660
(37.2%)
15,833
(41.2%)
28,939
(46.2%)
32,612
(51.5%)
32,917
(52.3%)
35,516
(52.5%)
1996 2001 2006 2011
Population 3,067,000 3,209,600 3,362,900 3,480,700
Proportion 48.8% 49.5% 50.7% 51.3%
23
Women Professionals
1. Certified Public AccountantsThousands (%)
Source: Hong Kong Institute of Certified Public Accountants
24
Women Professionals (II)
2. Solicitors Holding Practising CertificatesThousands (%)
Source: The Law Society of Hong Kong
25
Women Professionals (III)
3. Fully Qualified EngineersThousands (%)
Source: The Hong Kong Institution of Engineers
26
Women in Poverty
Poverty Rate by Sex in Hong Kong (2001 – 2011)
Source: The Hong Kong Council of Social Service
27
Employment Earnings (2010)
Source: Women’s Commission
Educational Attainment
Median (HK$)
Female Male
No schooling / Pre-primary
5,500 7,500
Primary 6,000 9,000
Lower secondary
6,800 9,500
Upper secondary / Sixth-form
10,000 11,500
Post-secondary: non-degree
12,000 14,000
Post-secondary: degree
20,000 28,000
Overall 10,000 12,000
28
Women on Board
Aggregate percentage of women on boards in 2011
Global 10.5%
Hong Kong 9.4%
China 8.5%
Japan 1.1%
South Korea 1.9%
India 5.2%
Taiwan 5.8%
Singapore 7.0%
UK 10.7%
USA 12.6%
Norway 36.3%
Source: GMI Rating’s 2012 Women on Boards Survey
29
Social and Political Participation
1. Female Members in Legislature/Lower House of Parliament
2. Female Directorate Officers in the Civil Service Source: Census and Statistics Department
Legislative Council of Hong Kong(2012-2016)
World Eastern Asia Western Europe
Proportion 16% 17% 14% 29%
Source: Legislative Council of Hong Kong and Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations
30