dr carl o’brien acom vice-chair
DESCRIPTION
ICES’ advice for 2010. Presentation to the BSRAC Demersal Working Group Tuesday 9 th June 2009 Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Copenhagen, Denmark. Dr Carl O’Brien ACOM Vice-chair. ICES’ advice for 2010. Released on the ICES’ web-site on 29 th May 2009 - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
1
Dr Carl O’Brien
ACOM Vice-chair
Presentation to the BSRACPresentation to the BSRAC
Demersal Working GroupDemersal Working Group
Tuesday 9Tuesday 9thth June 2009 June 2009
Ministry of Food, Agriculture and FisheriesMinistry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries
Copenhagen, DenmarkCopenhagen, Denmark
ICES’ advice for 2010
• Released on the ICES’ web-site on 29th May 2009
• Advice released concerns:– Cod, herring, sprat and salmon stocks– Sea trout and flatfishes– EC request on multi-annual management plan for
Baltic pelagic stocks
• Advice for Western Baltic herring is being developed in conjunction with the advice on North Sea herring and will be released on 26th June 2009
ICES’ advice for 2010
• Advice on pelagic stocks:
– Herring (excluding Western Baltic) and sprat
will be presented by Steen Christensen on behalf of ICES on 15th June 2009.
ICES’ advice for 2010
1. General approach
2. Benchmarking
3. Management plan evaluation
4. Work programme (calendar dates)
ICES’ advice process - aspects
1. • Begins with an assessment of the status of the fish
stocks involving scientists from the Baltic countries• The assessments are reviewed by experts not involved
with the assessments• Draft advice is developed based on this reviewed
assessment by scientists from the Baltic countries and the reviewers
• Advice is approved by the ICES’ Advisory Committee (ACOM):– constituted by one scientist from each of the 20 ICES’ member
countries plus a chair and four vice-chairs
ICES’ advice process - general
2. • Comprehensive and thorough investigation
– Biology … data … models … etcetera
• Inclusive process– Scientists … industry … policy … stakeholders …
• Stocks benchmarked in 2009 include:– Western Baltic cod– Eastern Baltic cod
• Results presented and discussed at BSRAC meeting on 18th March 2009
ICES’ advice process - benchmarking
3. • EC cod management plan evaluated by ICES in early March 2009:
– Western Baltic cod• Aim to reach and maintain a fishing mortality rate at 0.6; annual reduction
of fishing mortality by 10%
– Eastern Baltic cod• Aim to reach a fishing mortality rate no higher than 0.3; annual reduction of
fishing mortality by 10%
• Review Group on Cod Management Plans (16th – 27th March 2009)
– Coby Needle, UK– Jan Horbowy, Poland– Alexandre Kempf. Germany
ICES’ management plan evaluation
• ICES assumed that:
i. Current settings of the assessment model are largely maintained
ii. Effort reduction is fully achievediii. Biological parameters as assumed unchanged in the medium-
termiv. Exploitation pattern remains unchangedv. Observation error remains in the range of magnitude tested
• ICES concluded that each management plan is in accordance with the precautionary approach
– Applying the plan in its current design– Reference year of 2015
ICES’ management plan evaluation
4. • ICES’ WKROUND (16th – 23rd January 2009)
– Chair (Pamela Mace, New Zealand)– ICES’ co-ordinators (Chris Darby, Eero Aro)
• ICES’ Baltic Fisheries Assessment Working Group(22nd – 28th April 2009)
– Chair (Steen Christensen, Denmark)
• ICES’ Baltic Sea Review Group(11th – 15th May 2009)
– Chair (Asgeir Aglen, Norway)• ICES’ Baltic Sea Advice Drafting Group
(18th – 20th May 2009)– Chair (Reidar Toresen, Norway)
• ICES’ Advisory Committee(25th May 2009)
– Chair (Carl O’Brien, ICES)– Observers (Niki Sporrong, Ottilia Thoreson)
ICES’ advice process - dates
MP evaluation
10
Baltic cod and flatfish Baltic cod and flatfish stocksstocks
ICES’ advice for 2010
Western Baltic - Cod in Subdivisions 22-24– Estimated fishing mortality above target and has been
stable during the last three years– Discard estimates are considered uncertain, but not
very large compared to landings
ICES’ advice for 2010
Fishing Mortality
00.20.40.60.8
11.21.41.61.8
1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
F (
ag
es 3
-6)
Western Baltic - Cod in Subdivisions 22-24– Recent recruitments have been weak– Surveys indicate that the 2008 year-class may be the
strongest since the 2003 year-class
ICES’ advice for 2010
Recruitment (age 1)
050
100150200250300350400450
1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
Recru
itm
en
t in
millio
ns
Western Baltic - Cod in Subdivisions 22-24– Estimated biomass less than Bpa (23 kt)
– Benchmark process has revised the time-series of weights-at-age and proportion mature-at-age
ICES’ advice for 2010
Spawning Stock Biomass
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
SS
B in
1000 t
• Historical performance– Gives results of recent assessments for spawning stock biomass, fishing
mortality and recruitment• Possible retrospective over-estimation of fishing mortality and under-
estimation of spawning stock biomass– Less pronounced than previous analytical method used by ICES– Within confidence limits
ICES’ advice for 2010
Cod in Subdivisions 22 - 24
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1990 1995 2000 2005
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
1990 1995 2000 20050
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
0.16
1990 1995 2000 2005
Billions
ICES’ advice for 2010
Rationale Human Consumption
(2010)
Basis F Total(2010)
F HC
(2010)
F Disc
(2010)
Catch Total(2010)
Discards (2010)
SSB (2011)
%SSB change
1)
%TAC
change2)
Zero catch 0 F = 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.3 85% -100%
High long-term yield 8.6 Fsq*0.375 0.31 0.29 0.02 9.8 1.2 26.4 51% -47%
15.0 Fsq *0.7250.59 0.56 0.03 17.2 2.2 22.0 26%
-8%
Management plan 17.7 Fsq *0.9 0.74 0.70 0.04 20.3 2.6 20.1 16% +9%
Precautionary approach 13.3 B2011>Bpa 0.51 0.49 0.03 15.2 1.9 23.1 33% -19%
Status quo 7.0 Fsq*0.3 0.25 0.23 0.01 8.0 1.0 27.4 58% -57%
12.8 Fsq *0.60.49 0.47 0.03 14.7 1.9 23.4 35%
-21%
16.2 Fsq *0.8 0.66 0.62 0.03 18.6 2.4 21.2 22% 0%
17.7 Fsq *0.9 0.74 0.70 0.04 20.3 2.6 20.1 16% +9%
19.2 Fsq *1.0 0.82 0.78 0.04 22.1 2.9 19.2 10% 17%
20.6 Fsq *1.1 0.90 0.86 0.05 23.6 3.1 18.2 5% 26%
24.2 Fsq *1.4 1.15 1.09 0.06 28.0 3.7 15.8 -9% 48%
27.3 Fsq *1.7 1.39 1.32 0.07 31.6 4.3 13.8 -21% 67%
Eastern Baltic - Cod in Subdivisions 25-32– Estimated fishing mortality in 2008 uncertain but below Fpa (0.6) – Strong support for a declining trend in fishing mortality– Estimated mis-reporting has decreased to 6% in 2008,
compared to 32-45% in previous years– Discard estimates are uncertain but not high compared to
landings
ICES’ advice for 2010
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1966 1971 1976 1981 1986 1991 1996 2001 2006
F(a
ge
s 4
-7)
Fishing Mortality
F
Flim
Fpa
Eastern Baltic - Cod in Subdivisions 25-32– Recruitment has been low over the last 20 years– 2005 and 2006 year-classes are estimated to be the
strongest in 20 years
ICES’ advice for 2010
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1966 1971 1976 1981 1986 1991 1996 2001 2006
Re
cru
itm
en
t in
mil
lio
ns
Recruitment (age 2)
Eastern Baltic - Cod in Subdivisions 25-32– Estimated spawning stock biomass in 2008 is at a low
level but estimated to be twice as high as in 2005– Biomass reference points not defined
ICES’ advice for 2010
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
1966 1971 1976 1981 1986 1991 1996 2001 2006
SS
B i
n 1
00
0 t
Spawning Stock Biomass
• Historical performance– Gives results of recent assessments for spawning stock biomass, fishing
mortality and recruitment• No problems!
– Note that whilst the estimated fishing mortality for 2008 is considered to be rather uncertain, there is strong support for a declining trend in fishing mortality
ICES’ advice for 2010
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
1990 1995 2000 2005
SSB ('000 tonnes)
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
1.40
1.60
1990 1995 2000 2005
Fishing mortality: 4-7
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
1990 1995 2000 2005
Billions
Recruitment. Age: 2
ICES’ advice for 2010
Rationale Landings (2010)1
Basis Total F(2010)
F Lan-dings (2010)1
F Discards (2010)
Discards(2010)
Total Catch(2010)1
)
SSB(2011)
%SSB change 2)
%TAC change 3)
Zero catch 0.0 F=0 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.0 469.2 45% -100%
Status quo 17.6 Fsq *0.2 0.05 0.05 0.001 0.50 18.1 449.4 39% -64%
42.6 Fsq *0.5 0.12 0.12 0.001 1.22 43.8 421.4 30% -14%
62.1 Fsq *0.75 0.18 0.18 0.002 1.80 63.9 399.6 23% 26%
73.4 Fsq *0.9 0.22 0.21 0.002 2.13 75.5 387.1 19% 49%
80.7 Fsq *1 0.24 0.24 0.003 2.36 83.0 378.9 17% 63%
98.2 Fsq *1.25 0.30 0.30 0.003 2.90 101.1 359.4 11% 99%
114.8 Fsq *1.5 0.36 0.36 0.004 3.43 118.2 341.0 5% 133%
130.5 Fsq *1.75 0.42 0.42 0.005 3.94 134.5 323.7 0% 164%
145.5 Fsq *2 0.48 0.48 0.005 4.44 149.9 307.2 -5% 195%
Precautionary limits
21.7 F(pa) *0.1 0.06 0.06 0.001 0.61 22.3 444.8 37% -56%
52.2 F(pa) *0.25 0.15 0.15 0.002 1.50 53.7 410.7 27% 6%
97.7 F(pa) *0.5 0.30 0.30 0.003 2.88 100.6 360.0 11% 98%
137.4 F(pa) *0.75 0.45 0.45 0.005 4.17 141.6 316.1 -3% 178%
162.6 F(pa) *0.9 0.54 0.53 0.006 4.96 167.6 288.1 -11% 229%
180.7 Fpa = Fsq *2.61 0.60 0.59 0.007 5.52 186.2 268.0 -17% 266%
198.8 F(pa) *1.1 0.66 0.65 0.007 6.07 204.8 247.9 -24% 303%
225.9 F(pa) *1.25 0.75 0.74 0.008 6.89 232.8 217.7 -33% 357%
271.1 F(pa) *1.5 0.90 0.89 0.010 8.27 279.3 167.4 -48% 449%
Management plan 56.8 +15% TAC deviation 4) 0.16 0.16 0.002 1.64 58.4 405.6 25% 15%
21
Baltic flatfish stocksBaltic flatfish stocks
… … no advice categoryno advice category
ICES’ advice for 2010
Flounder in Subdivisions 22-32– Stock structure is not clear (migration studies)– Uncertainties in age-reading are inadequate to establish reliable
assessments based on commercial landings data and to evaluate stock trends
– Considerable uncertainty about the level of discarding– State of the stock is unknown– No scientific basis for an advice
• Future analytical assessment– Improvement in basic data quality– Age-reading exchange programmes and reference collection of
otoliths– Discard sampling and analyses
ICES’ advice for 2010
• Landings have increased since the late 1990s
ICES’ advice for 2010
Flounder in SD 24 - 25 Total Landing [metric tonnes]
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
1975
1977
1979
1981
1983
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
SD other
SD 25
SD 24
Brill in Subdivisions 22-32– Available information (landings: 1994-1996 ?)
is inadequate to evaluate stock trends– State of the stock is unknown– No scientific basis for an advice
ICES’ advice for 2010
Landings
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
19
70
19
72
19
74
19
76
19
78
19
80
19
82
19
84
19
86
19
88
19
90
19
92
19
94
19
96
19
98
20
00
20
02
20
04
20
06
20
08
La
nd
ing
s in
t
Dab in Subdivisions 22-32– Available information (landings) is inadequate
to evaluate stock trends– State of the stock is unknown– No scientific basis for an advice
ICES’ advice for 2010
Landings
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
1970
1972
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Land
ings
in t
Plaice in Subdivisions 22-32– Available information (landings) is inadequate
to evaluate stock trends– State of the stock is unknown– No scientific basis for an advice
ICES’ advice for 2010
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
1970
1972
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Lan
din
gs in
t
Landings
Turbot in Subdivisions 22-32– Available information (landings) is inadequate
to evaluate stock trends– State of the stock is unknown– No scientific basis for an advice
ICES’ advice for 2010
Landings
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,4001965
1967
1969
1971
1973
1975
1977
1979
1981
1983
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
Land
ings
in t
28
Baltic cod and flatfish Baltic cod and flatfish stocks:stocks:
Comments and questionsComments and questions
ICES’ advice for 2010