downstream loading and trends in water quality in the wabash and white rivers - usgs
DESCRIPTION
United States Department of Interior. Downstream loading and Trends in Water Quality in the Wabash and White Rivers - USGS. Jeff Frey, USGS November 4, 2011. White River at Hazleton, Ind. USGS Programs that Monitor the Wabash River System - Active. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Downstream loading and Trends in Water Quality in the Wabash and White Rivers - USGS](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568163ab550346895dd4bd39/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Downstream loading and Trends in Water Quality in the
Wabash and White Rivers - USGS
United States Department of Interior
Jeff Frey, USGS
November 4, 2011White River at Hazleton, Ind.
![Page 2: Downstream loading and Trends in Water Quality in the Wabash and White Rivers - USGS](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568163ab550346895dd4bd39/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
USGS Programs that Monitor the Wabash River System - Active
–National Stream Quality Accounting Network (NASQAN)• Wabash River at New Harmony, IN
(1973-1983, 1996-present)• White River at Hazleton, IN
(1973-1983, 2007-present)
–National Water Quality-Assessment Program (NAWQA)• White River at Hazleton, IN (1991-present)
![Page 3: Downstream loading and Trends in Water Quality in the Wabash and White Rivers - USGS](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568163ab550346895dd4bd39/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Location of the Active Wabash and White River sites
Sugar Creek at New Palestine, IN, 2003
![Page 4: Downstream loading and Trends in Water Quality in the Wabash and White Rivers - USGS](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568163ab550346895dd4bd39/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Location for the Major
Sub-basins of the
Mississippi River
![Page 5: Downstream loading and Trends in Water Quality in the Wabash and White Rivers - USGS](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568163ab550346895dd4bd39/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Smith and others, 1982, used seasonal Kendall test at NASQAN sites for Total Phosphorus
![Page 6: Downstream loading and Trends in Water Quality in the Wabash and White Rivers - USGS](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568163ab550346895dd4bd39/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Sources of Nutrients
Nutrient Primer
From Nutrient Circular, Dubrovsky and others, 2010
![Page 7: Downstream loading and Trends in Water Quality in the Wabash and White Rivers - USGS](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568163ab550346895dd4bd39/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Nitrogen and Phosphorus nonpoint inputs – come primarily from fertilizer in the White and Miami River Basins
![Page 8: Downstream loading and Trends in Water Quality in the Wabash and White Rivers - USGS](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568163ab550346895dd4bd39/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Wabash River at New Harmony, Ind.
Total Phosphorus
http://toxics.usgs.gov/pubs/of-2007-1080/methods.html
![Page 9: Downstream loading and Trends in Water Quality in the Wabash and White Rivers - USGS](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568163ab550346895dd4bd39/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Wabash River at New Harmony, Ind.
Nitrate plus Nitrite
http://toxics.usgs.gov/pubs/of-2007-1080/methods.html
![Page 10: Downstream loading and Trends in Water Quality in the Wabash and White Rivers - USGS](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568163ab550346895dd4bd39/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
Wabash River at New Harmony, Ind.Ammonia Flux (metric tons as N)
![Page 11: Downstream loading and Trends in Water Quality in the Wabash and White Rivers - USGS](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568163ab550346895dd4bd39/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Total Nitrogen Loads for the Major Sub-basins of the Mississippi River
Ohio River
… 1980-1996 average__ 5 year moving average
![Page 12: Downstream loading and Trends in Water Quality in the Wabash and White Rivers - USGS](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568163ab550346895dd4bd39/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Total Nitrogen Flow-weighted Concentrations: Major Sub-basins of the Mississippi River
Ohio River
… 1980-1996 average__ 5 year moving average
![Page 13: Downstream loading and Trends in Water Quality in the Wabash and White Rivers - USGS](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568163ab550346895dd4bd39/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Total Phosphorus Loads for the Major Sub-basins of the Mississippi River
Ohio River
… 1980-1996 average__ 5 year moving average
![Page 14: Downstream loading and Trends in Water Quality in the Wabash and White Rivers - USGS](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568163ab550346895dd4bd39/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Total Phosphorus Flow-weighted Concentrations: Major Sub-basins of the Mississippi River
Ohio River
… 1980-1996 average__ 5 year moving average
![Page 15: Downstream loading and Trends in Water Quality in the Wabash and White Rivers - USGS](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568163ab550346895dd4bd39/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Nitrate Flow-weighted Concentrations: Major Sub-basins of the Mississippi River
Wabash River
Ohio River
![Page 16: Downstream loading and Trends in Water Quality in the Wabash and White Rivers - USGS](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568163ab550346895dd4bd39/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Ammonia Flow-weighted Concentrations: Major Sub-basins of the Mississippi River
Wabash River
Ohio River
![Page 17: Downstream loading and Trends in Water Quality in the Wabash and White Rivers - USGS](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568163ab550346895dd4bd39/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
PO4 Flow-weighted Concentrations: Major Sub-basins of the Mississippi River
Wabash River
Ohio River
![Page 18: Downstream loading and Trends in Water Quality in the Wabash and White Rivers - USGS](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568163ab550346895dd4bd39/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
TP Flow-weighted Concentrations: Major Sub-basins of the Mississippi River
Total Phosphorus
Wabash River
Ohio River
![Page 19: Downstream loading and Trends in Water Quality in the Wabash and White Rivers - USGS](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568163ab550346895dd4bd39/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Atrazine Flow-weighted Concentrations: Major Sub-basins of the Mississippi River
Total Phosphorus
Wabash River
Ohio River
![Page 20: Downstream loading and Trends in Water Quality in the Wabash and White Rivers - USGS](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568163ab550346895dd4bd39/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Super Gage White River at Hazleton, IN (03374100)
http://www.ipcamhost.net/test_player.jsp?id=18&path=usgs-in
http://waterdata.usgs.gov/in/nwis/uv/?site_no=03374100
![Page 21: Downstream loading and Trends in Water Quality in the Wabash and White Rivers - USGS](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568163ab550346895dd4bd39/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Suspended Sediment vs. Turbidity
White River at Hazleton, IN
1 10 100 100010
100
1000
Turbidity, Formazin nephelometric units
Susp
ende
d se
dim
ent c
once
ntra
-tio
n, m
g/L
R2 = 0.96RSE = 0.082N = 13
![Page 22: Downstream loading and Trends in Water Quality in the Wabash and White Rivers - USGS](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568163ab550346895dd4bd39/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
QA/QC leads to accurate data
White River at Hazleton, IN
8/1 8/3 8/5 8/7 8/9 8/11 8/13 8/150
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
Turbidity, raw data Turbidity, corrected Gage height
Turb
idity
, For
maz
in n
ephe
lo-
met
ric u
nits
Gag
e he
ight
, fee
t
Initial Turbidity Raw 48 Corrected 48
Final Turbidity Raw 106 Corrected 76
Peak Turbidity Raw 161 Corrected 140
![Page 23: Downstream loading and Trends in Water Quality in the Wabash and White Rivers - USGS](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568163ab550346895dd4bd39/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Suspended Sediment vs. Turbidity
Eagle Creek at Zionsville, IN
1 10 100 10001
10
100
1000
Turbidity, Formazin nephelometric units
Susp
ende
d se
dim
ent c
once
ntra
-tio
n, m
g/L
R2= 0.99RSE = 1.359N=13
![Page 24: Downstream loading and Trends in Water Quality in the Wabash and White Rivers - USGS](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568163ab550346895dd4bd39/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
More information
National Stream Quality Accounting Network (NASQAN)
http://water.usgs.gov/nasqan/
National Water Quality-Assessment Program (NAWQA)
http://water.usgs.gov/nawqa/