Download - What Makes a Great Debater
-
7/29/2019 What Makes a Great Debater
1/3
What makes a great debater?
Debating is a match of ideas. It gives the audience the chance to hear the ideas
of one team and the counter arguments of the other team. Being on a debate team can
be a great experience. Moreover, learning how to debate is a great skill to have.
Apparently, for many professions such as being a lawyer, a person needs to be able to
debate an argument in order to succeed. The knowledge about what a person is talking
about and the ability to express these ideas make a great debater.
A great debater is very much knowledgeable of what he is talking about. Initially,
one should spend time in researching, seeking and reviewing his assigned topics.
Furthermore, one needs to study the historical background of the topic and why it is a
matter of current interest. One should be familiarized not only with his argument, but
also his opponents arguments. In this way, one will already know what his opponent will
say and by this, one can be ready by analyzing the opponents points in order to get
strong counter-arguments to those points and catch his opponent off guard. One should
make sure that his facts are right for the reason that inaccurate data and information
can grant an opening to the opponent. A great debater should come to a debate with
the confidence that he is arguing with the right and accurate facts.
People love to hear great stories and they admire good storytellers. Get a great
story related to your point of view and deliver it well. Whenever one encounters a really
clever opponent, do not panic. Ones reaction to the opponents points can make or
break the likelihood of winning. Make use of concise and humorous phrases to tone
down the effect and erase the impact of the opponents approach. Let the audience and
judges feel your passion for the topic. Ones ability to catch the attention of the audience
will pay in the end.
A debate is a dialogue with a lot of construction. Incomplete sentences are equal
to deficient ideas. These deficient ideas can weaken a strong argument. A debater
cannot afford to be sloppy in a debate. The articulation, pitch, diction and enunciation
are significant. The strongest and powerful points of a debater must be argued with
-
7/29/2019 What Makes a Great Debater
2/3
clarity and conviction. It is through a debaters delivery that the points about the
argument are comprehended.
A great debater is someone who is very much familiar with his piece. He must
get to know every side of his argument for him to be able to answer all the questions
competitively and throw witty and clever questions back to his opponent. A great
debater must be a good speaker. He must be able to convey his arguments precisely
and effectively all the time. For a good debater knows how to say the things he know in
a way that all people will understand.
Najarro, Violeta Jr. M
BSLM IA
The Last Debate
-
7/29/2019 What Makes a Great Debater
3/3
Civil disobedience is a moral weapon in the fight for justice. This is the
argument stated by James Farmer Jr. What is civil disobedience? It is the refusal to
obey certain laws and commands of the government. How can disobedience ever be
moral?. James Farmer Jr. related a story about the rule of Gen. Reginald Dyer, where
ten thousand people protested about the British rule. Gen. Dyer trapped them in a
courtyard and ordered his troops to fire into them. Three hundred seventy nine were
killed including men, women and children. Dyer said that he taught him a moral
lesson. He then compared it with Mahatma Gandhis response with no violence and
compared the definition of moral to Dyers victory or Gandhis victory.
The next speaker was their opponent from Harvard. He said that civil
disobedience is not moral because it is nonviolent. He added that fighting for the
country can be deeply moral, demanding the greatest sacrifice of all. Nonviolence is the
mask civil disobedience wears to conceal its true face: anarchy.
Samantha Booke then said, Gandhi believes one must always act with love and
respect for ones opponents. Law breakers must accept the legal consequences for
their actions. According to her, civil obedience is not something for us to fear.
The debater from Harvard quoted Henry David Thoreau with Any man more
right than his neighbours constitutes a majority of one. He said that the beauty of and
the burden of democracy is that no idea prevails without the support of the majority. The
people decide the moral issues of the day, not a majority of one.
Samantha answered that majorities do not decide what is wrong right or wrong
but the conscience does. She said that we must never kneel down before the tyranny of
a majority.
The debater from Harvard said that a person cannot decide which laws to obeyand to ignore. Nothing that erodes the rule of law can be moral no matter what name is
given to it.
James Farmer Jr. quoted, An unjust law is no law at all according to Saint
Augustine.