This article was downloaded by: [University Of Maryland]On: 08 May 2014, At: 15:30Publisher: Taylor & FrancisInforma Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office:Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK
Journal of Macromolecular Science, Part B:PhysicsPublication details, including instructions for authors and subscriptioninformation:http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/lmsb20
Water‐Responsive Shape MemoryPolyurethane Block Copolymer Modified withPolyhedral Oligomeric SilsesquioxaneYong Chae Jung a , Hyang Hwa So a & Jae Whan Cho aa Department of Textile Engineering , Konkuk University , Seoul , KoreaPublished online: 16 Aug 2006.
To cite this article: Yong Chae Jung , Hyang Hwa So & Jae Whan Cho (2006) Water‐Responsive Shape MemoryPolyurethane Block Copolymer Modified with Polyhedral Oligomeric Silsesquioxane, Journal of MacromolecularScience, Part B: Physics, 45:4, 453-461, DOI: 10.1080/00222340600767513
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222340600767513
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”)contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and ourlicensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, orsuitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publicationare the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor &Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independentlyverified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for anylosses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilitieswhatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to orarising out of the use of the Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantialor systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, ordistribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and usecan be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
Water-Responsive Shape Memory PolyurethaneBlock Copolymer Modified with Polyhedral
Oligomeric Silsesquioxane
YONG CHAE JUNG, HYANG HWA SO, AND JAE WHAN CHO
Department of Textile Engineering, Konkuk University, Seoul, Korea
Nanostructured polyurethane block copolymers with shape memory were synthesizedby using polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS) molecules and poly(ethyleneglycol) (PEG), which acted as the hydrophobic and hydrophilic groups, respectively.The hard segment domains appeared to be dominantly governed by POSS moleculesaccording to X-ray diffraction and Fourier transform-infrared (FT-IR) measurements.As the POSS content increased, the phase separation between hard and soft segmentsgradually developed, followed by the crystallization of POSS molecules, and the meltingtemperature and heat of fusion for POSS crystals increased. The water-responsive shapememory behavior which resulted from the dissolution of soft segments was demonstratedat 308C. More than 70% shape recovery was achieved in the water-responsive shaperecovery test, which depended on the POSS content.
Keywords POSS, shape memory, water-responsive, polyurethane, block copolymer
1 Introduction
Shape memory materials have been utilized in many applications, such as actuator,
biomedical robot, medical, and industrial applications. Up to now, shape memory
alloys, like Nitinol, have been primarily used; however, shape memory polymer has
recently received increasing attention as a substitute or competing material for shape
memory alloys. Shape memory polymer has many advantages compared with shape
memory alloys, for example, lightness, flexibility, easy processing, high shape recovery,
and low cost.
The shape memory effect of polymers was achieved by thermal stimulation due to
heating above a transition temperature such as the glass transition temperature or
melting temperature. Polyurethane block copolymer (PU) is a typical example of such
shape memory polymers.[1,2] However, some other stimulating sources, such as pH,
electric field, and chemicals, may also be useful for actuating shape memory
polymers.[3,4] Recently, electroactive shape memory has been reported in polyurethane
block copolymer composites containing carbon nanotubes.[3,5]
An interesting water-responsive shape memory polymer may be created by introdu-
cing hydrophilic and hydrophobic groups in the soft and hard segments, respectively.
Received 2 January 2006; Accepted 8 January 2006.Address correspondence to Jae Whan Cho, Department of Textile Engineering, Konkuk
University, Seoul 143-701, Korea. E-mail: [email protected]
Journal of Macromolecular Sciencew, Part B: Physics, 45:453–461, 2006
Copyright # Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
ISSN 0022-2348 print/1525-609X online
DOI: 10.1080/00222340600767513
453
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity O
f M
aryl
and]
at 1
5:30
08
May
201
4
Polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS) is one of potential candidates as the hydro-
phobic group. It is composed of a polyhedral silicon oxygen nanostructured skeleton with
intermittent siloxane chains, and has novel mechanical properties due to its cage-like
molecule.[6 – 8] Polyurethane containing POSS molecules in the polymer chain has a
strongly enhanced tensile modulus and strength due to the presence of POSS molecules
as nanoscale reinforcement agents as well as formation of well phase-separated hard
segment domains from soft segments.[9 – 13] Block copolymers containing poly(ethylene
oxide) (PEO) as the hydrophilic block, like Pluronic polymers, have high solubility in
water due to their excellent hydrophilicity.[14,15] Recently some interesting research on
PEO-containing amphiphilic block copolymers was also reported in applications of
water-swellable elastomers. Some PEO-POSS amphiphilic triblock copolymers show
significantly improved properties compared with other triblock copolymers.
In this study, polyurethane block copolymer modified with POSS were synthesized,
and their structural characteristics and water-responsive shape memory were investigated.
2 Experimental
2.1 Synthesis of POSS-PU and Film Preparation
Poly(ethylene glycols) (PEG) with molecular weights of 10,000 g/mol (Aldrich Co.) were
purified by the process of precipitation by n-hexane from tetrahydrofuran solution,
followed by drying in a vacuum oven. 1-[2-Ethyl-2-[(3-dimethylsiloxy) propoxymethyl]-
1,3-propanediol]-3,5,7,9,11,13,15-isobutylpenta cyclo-[9.5.1.1.1]-octasiloxane (POSS,
95%, Hybrid Plastics) and 1,4-phenyldiisocyanate (PDI, 98%, Mw ¼ 160.13 g/mol,
Aldrich Co.) were used as received.
The PU used in this study was synthesized in a one-step polymerization method.
Determined amounts of PEG and POSS were dissolved in toluene. Various mole ratios
of PDI were added to the reactor, which was heated at 508C. After the reaction mixture
was heated to 908C, dibutyltin dilaurate (95%, Aldrich Co.) was added through a
syringe. The reaction was kept at 908C for 2 h under nitrogen atmosphere before com-
pletion. Then the reacted solution was precipitated into an excess amount of n-hexane,
filtered, and dried. The final film was obtained by casting a solution of 10 wt% in
toluene. A schematic description of the polymerization procedure is shown in Fig. 1.
Molecular weight of the polymers was measured, it was dependent on the mole ratio of
POSS:PEG as represented in Table 1. It was measured by using a gel permeation
chromatograph (Waters 2414) equipped with Styragel HR2, HR4, and HR5 columns.
2.2 Characterization of Samples
The Fourier transform-infrared (FT-IR) spectra using film were obtained with a Jasco
FT-IR 300E spectrometer equipped with attenuated total reflectance. X-ray diffractograms
were obtained with a Rigaku Rint 2100 series X-ray diffractometer, using CuKa radiation
at a scan rate of 58/min. Differential scanning calorimetric (DSC) measurements were
carried out with a TA instrument (DSC 2010). Samples were heated from room tempera-
ture to the melt at a rate of 108C/min in a nitrogen atmosphere. The surface topology of the
spin-coated samples was obtained using a Seico SPI-300HV SPM in the contact mode with
a Pt coated tip.
The water-triggered shape recovery was measured by immersing the sample in ring
form in the water at 308C. Shape-fixing was made by bending a rectangular strip with
Y. C. Jung et al.454
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity O
f M
aryl
and]
at 1
5:30
08
May
201
4
2 mm width and 20 mm length in a ring form at 608C, followed by quenching into a dry-ice
bath. Then, images of shape recovery were recorded by using a video camera, and change
in curvature was measured to calculate shape recovery (SR) using Eq. (1).
SR ð%Þ ¼ ðð90� uÞ=90Þ � 100 ð1Þ
Hence, u (degree) indicated an angle between a tangential line at a midpoint of the sample
and a line connecting the midpoint and end of the curved sample.
3 Results and Discussion
Polyurethanes having POSS and PEG groups as the hard and soft segments, respectively,
were synthesized in a one-step polymerization as shown in Fig. 1. From the FT-IR
measurements, formation of the urethane linkages due to reaction between the hydroxyl
Figure 1. Polymerization procedure of the POSS-PU block copolymer.
Table 1Specification of POSS-PU samples synthesized in this study
Samples code
Feed mole ratioMW
(g/mol) Mw/Mn
HS content
(wt%) DPS (%)PEG POSS PDI
10K-P-134 1 3 4 34,189 6.26 28 49.42
10K-P-145 1 4 5 25,696 6.95 33 49.81
10K-P-156 1 5 6 22,438 8.91 38 49.61
10K-P-167 1 6 7 30,223 9.36 43 49.77
10K-P-178 1 7 8 17,945 7.69 49 49.53
HS: hard segment, DPS: degree of phase separation.
Shape Memory Polymers Modified with POSS 455
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity O
f M
aryl
and]
at 1
5:30
08
May
201
4
groups of PEG and diisocyanates of PDI and the hydroxyl groups of POSS diol and
diisocyanates could be seen.
Figure 2 shows FT-IR spectra of the PUs at different POSS:PEG mole ratios. Two
characteristic peaks near 1703 cm21 and 1727 cm21 are ascribed to the stretching
vibration of carbonyl (–C55O) groups in the hard segments.[16 – 18] The former peak is
due to the presence of hydrogen-bonded carbonyl groups formed by phase separation
and intermolecular interaction with 22NH in hard segments, whereas the latter peak
is due to the presence of nonhydrogen-bonded carbonyl groups due to their dissolution
in the matrix of soft segments. These absorption peaks near 1703 cm21 and 1727 cm21
are useful to evaluate the phase separation of PU. That is, the degree of phase
separation (DPS) based on the carbonyl groups can be calculated by the following
equation.
DPS ¼ R=ð1þ RÞ ð2Þ
Where R indicates a ratio of A1727 to A1703, and A1703 and A1727 are the absorbance values
at 1703 cm21 and 1727 cm21, respectively.
The calculated DPS values are presented in Table 1, and essentially do not change
with the mole ratio of POSS:PEG or hard segment content. The phase separation
increases with increasing hard segment content in most cases of polyurethane. Our
results indicate that the phase separation for our PU samples may be not completely
governed by the carbonyl groups, recalling that the DPS value is calculated from the
phase separation based on the hydrogen and nonhydrogen bonds due to the carbonyl
group in hard segments. In other words, it may be explained by the fact that the hard
segment content is primarily governed by POSS molecules in spite of the significant
contribution of carbonyl groups in the hard segments.
The X-ray diffraction profiles of POSS:PEG are shown in Fig. 3. The pure PEG shows
reflections at 2u ¼ 21.48 (4.10 A), 24.28 (3.68 A), and 36.58 (2.46 A), corresponding to the
(110), (200), and (020) reflections of the usual orthorhombic PEG crystal structure.[19] The
PUs in this study show additional peaks at 2u ¼ 8.28 (11.04 A) and 10.78 (8.23 A) besides
Figure 2. FT-IR spectra of PU samples with different POSS:PEG mole ratio.
Y. C. Jung et al.456
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity O
f M
aryl
and]
at 1
5:30
08
May
201
4
diffraction peaks at 2u ¼ 21.48, 24.28, and 36.58 due to PEG crystals. These clearly
correspond to the reflections of POSS crystals.[6,9,13] This indicates that the POSS
molecules in this study are not individually dispersed at a molecular level, but form the
crystals in the polyurethane copolymer. As the POSS content increases, the relative
intensity corresponding to each reflection of the POSS and PEG crystals changes
gradually. That is, the PUs has two separate crystalline components, of POSS and PEG.
This indicates that the POSS molecules play an important role in formation of the hard
segments in PU. As a result, the crystallization in the hard segment domain is primarily
governed by aggregation of POSS molecules.
Figure 4 shows DSC thermograms of PU samples, which were obtained during
heating at a rate of 108C/min. All the samples exhibit two endothermic peaks near
458C and 1158C.[20,21] The peaks at lower and higher temperatures are due to the
melting temperatures of PEG soft segment crystals and POSS hard segment crystals,
respectively. It can also be seen that the PEG endothermic area is relatively larger than
the POSS endothermic area. This is because of the low crystallinity due to crystallization
or aggregation of POSS molecules. According to Waddon et al.[6] it is impossible for the
POSS molecules in polyethylene-POSS copolymer to crystallize in three-dimensions of
crystals due to considerable spatial constraints imposed on the crystal shape, and they
develop in two-dimensional crystals. On the other hand, the melting temperature and
heat of fusion of the hard segment domain increase, whereas those of the soft segment
domain decrease with an increase in POSS content as shown in Figs. 5 and 6. This
reflects the dependence of phase separation on the mole ratio of POSS:PEG.
Figure 3. X-ray reflections of samples with different mole ratio of POSS:PEG.
Shape Memory Polymers Modified with POSS 457
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity O
f M
aryl
and]
at 1
5:30
08
May
201
4
The scanning probe microscopy (SPM) topographical images of thin films prepared by
spin-coating are shown in Fig. 7. The bright areas correspond to POSS absorption, and thus
the phase separated morphology differs with POSS content. As the POSS content increases,
the POSS molecules are dispersed in smaller domains, indicating that a more developed
phase separation of hard and soft segments appears with the increased POSS content. The
most developed phase-separation is seen for the 7:1 POSS:PEG sample, and it is apparent
that the POSS has a dominant effect on the phase separation.
Figure 8 shows the water-responsive shape recovery behavior of a rectangular PU strip
when it is immersed into water at 308C. The initial straight shape of the sample was fixed in a
Figure 4. DSC thermograms of samples with different mole ratio of POSS:PEG obtained on heating.
Figure 5. Melting temperatures of samples vs. mole ratio of POSS:PEG.
Y. C. Jung et al.458
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity O
f M
aryl
and]
at 1
5:30
08
May
201
4
ring form by deforming at 608C and cooling to room temperature. The original shape of the
sample is nearly recovered in 300 seconds when the ring sample is immersed into water at
308C. It was also found that water-responsive shape recovery is dependent on the tempera-
ture of water used. That is, as temperature of water is increased, more rapid recovery
Figure 6. The heat of fusion of samples vs. mole ratio of POSS:PEG.
Figure 7. SPM images of samples with a different mole ratio of POSS : PEG: (a) 3:1, (b) 4:1, (c) 5:1,
(d) 6:1, (e) 7:1.
Shape Memory Polymers Modified with POSS 459
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity O
f M
aryl
and]
at 1
5:30
08
May
201
4
appears, for example, the shape recovery in water at 608C was 10 seconds; above the melting
temperature of PEO crystals, very rapid shape recovery occurs due to combined effects of
water absorption and thermal heating. Shape recovery greater than 70% is observed in
the water-responsive shape recovery test, as shown in Fig. 9. The best shape recovery of
85% is observed in the sample at a mole ratio of 5:1 POSS:PEG.
4 Conclusion
From investigation of structure and properties of polyurethane block copolymers modified with
POSS, the following conclusions were derived. The hard segment domain was governed by
crystallization of POSS molecules due to the phase separation. As the POSS content
increased, higher melting temperature and crystallinity due to POSS crystals were obtained,
whereas the melting temperature and crystallinity due to PEG soft segments were lowered.
Water-responsive shape recovery at 308C of more than 70% was achieved for all samples. Con-
sequently, POSS-PU may be useful for the water-responsive shape memory materials.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Korea Research Foundation Grant (KRF-2004-041-
D00827).
Figure 8. Typical example of water-sensitive shape recovery behavior of POSS-PU sample at 358C.
Figure 9. Water-sensitive shape recovery of samples vs. mole ratio of POSS:PEG.
Y. C. Jung et al.460
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity O
f M
aryl
and]
at 1
5:30
08
May
201
4
References
1. Lendlein, A.; Kelch, S. Shape-memory polymers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 2034.
2. Lee, B.S.; Chun, B.C.; Chung, Y.C.; Sul, K.I.; Cho, J.W. Structure and thermomechanical
properties of polyurethane block copolymers with shape memory effect. Macromolecules
2001, 34, 6431.
3. Cho, J.W.; Kim, J.W.; Jung, Y.C.; Goo, N.S. Electroactive shape-memory polyurethane compo-
sites incorporating carbon nanotubes. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2005, 26, 412.
4. Lendlein, A.; Jiang, H.; Junger, O.; Langer, R. Light-induced shape-memory polymers. Nature
2005, 434, 879.
5. Watanabe, M.; Wakimoto, N.; Hirai, T.; Yokoyama, M. Thermal switching of the actuation
ability of an electroactive polymer actuator. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2005, 95, 1566.
6. Zheng, L.; Waddon, A.J.; Farris, R.J.; Coughlin, E.B. X-ray characterizations of polyethylene
polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane copolymers. Macromolecules 2002, 35, 2375.
7. Schwab, J.J.; Lichtenhan, J.D. Polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS)-based polymers.
Appl. Organomet. Chem. 1998, 12, 707.
8. Bharadwaj, R.K.; Berry, R.J.; Farmer, B.L. Molecular dynamics simulation study of norbonone-
POSS polymers. Polymer 2000, 41, 7209.
9. Phillips, S.H.; Haddad, T.S.; Tomczak, S.J. Developments in nanoscience: polyhedral
oligomeric silsesquioxane-polymers. Curr. Opin. Solid St. M. 2004, 8, 21.
10. Pyun, J.; Mtyjaszewski, K.; Wu, J.; Kim, G.-M.; Chun, S.B.; Mather, P.T. ABA triblock copo-
lymers containing polyhedral oligomeric silesquioxane pendant groups: synthesis and unique
properties. Polymer 2003, 44, 2739.
11. Fu, B.X.; Lee, A.; Haddad, T.S. Styrene-butadiende-styrene triblock copolymers modified with
polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes. Macromolecules 2004, 37, 5211.
12. Zheng, L.; Farris, R.J.; Coughlin, E.B. Novel polyolefin nanocomposites: synthesis and
characterizations of metallocene-catalyzed polyolefin polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane
copolymers. Macromolecules 2001, 34, 8034.
13. Fu, B.X.; Lee, A.; Haddad, T.S. Styrene-butadiende-styrene triblock copolymers modified with
polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes. Macromolecules 2004, 37, 5211.
14. Li, G.; Cai, Q.; Bei, J.; Wang, S. Relationship between morphology structure and composition of
polycaprolactone/poly(ethylene oxide)/polylactides copolymeric microspheres. Polym. Advan.
Technol. 2002, 13, 636.
15. Su, Y.-I.; Wang, J.; Liu, H.-Z. Melt, hydration, and micellization of the PEO-PPO-PEO block
copolymer studied by FTIR spectroscopy. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 2002, 251, 417.
16. Wang, F.C.; Feve, M.; Lam, T.M.; Pascault, J.P. FTIR analysis of hydrogen bonding in
amorphous linear aromatic polyurethanes. I. influence of temperature. J. Polym. Sci. Polym.
Phys. 1994, 32, 1305.
17. Wang, F.C.; Feve, M.; Lam, T.M.; Pascault, J.P. FTIR analysis of hydrogen bonding in
amorphous linear aromatic polyurethanes. II. influence of styrene solvent. J. Polym. Sci.
Polym. Phys. 1994, 32, 1315.
18. Garrett, J.T.; Xu, R.; Cho, J.; Runt, J. Phase separation of diamine chain-extended
poly(urethane) copolymers: FTIR spectroscopy and phase separation. Polymer 2003, 44, 2711.
19. Schmalz, H.; Knoll, A.; Muller, A.J.; Abetz, V. Synthesis and characterization of ABC triblock
copolymers with two different crystalline end blocks: influence of confinement on crystalliza-
tion behavior and morphology. Macromolecules 2002, 35, 10004.
20. Saiani, A.; Daunch, W.A.; Verbeke, H.; Leenslag, J.-W.; Higgins, J.S. Origin of multiple
melting endotherms in a high hard block content polyurethane. 1. thermodynamic investigation.
Macromolecules 2001, 34, 9059.
21. Saiani, A.; Rochas, C.; Eckhaut, G.; Daunch, W.A.; Leenslag, J.S.; Higgins, J.S. Origin of
multiple melting endotherms in a high block content polyurethane. 2. structural investigation.
Macromolecules 2004, 37, 1411.
Shape Memory Polymers Modified with POSS 461
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity O
f M
aryl
and]
at 1
5:30
08
May
201
4