Annexure C Principal Risk Assessment
Table of Contents
1.0 ASSESSMENT PARTICIPANTS 2
1.1 Venue 2
1.2 Assessment Requested By 2
1.3 Facilitator 2
1.1 Attendees 2
2.0 OVERVIEW 2
3.0 SCOPE OF WORK 2
4.0 OBJECTIVE 3
5.0 SCOPE 3
6.0 STAKEHOLDERS 3
7.0 RISK METHODOLOGY 3
8.0 RISK ASSESSMENT SUMMARY 3
9.0 RISK CONTROL 3
10.0 PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR AUTHORISATION AND IMPLEMENTING RISK CONTROL 3
11.0 METHOD OF MONITORING IMPLEMENTED RISK CONTROLS 3
12.0 NOMINATED TRIGGER FOR A REVIEW OF THE RISK ASSESSMENT 4
13.0 NOMINATED ACCOUNTABLE PERSON TO REVIEW THE RISK ASSESSMENT 4
14.0 NON-CONSENSUS MATTERS 4
15.0 RISK MATRIX 4
16.0 ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT 4
17.0 WORKPLACE RISK ASSESSMENT 4
18.0 POTENTIAL EMERGENCIES FOR THE PROJECT 5
19.0 HAZARDS AND RISKS 6
20.0 HEALTH SURVEILLANCE/MONITORING 7
21.0 EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION 8
22.0 TEMPORARY WORKS/TEMPORARY SUPPORT STRUCTURES 9
23.0 HIGH RISK WORK 10
APPENDIX 1 RISK MATRIX 14
APPENDIX 2 ENVIRONMENTAL RISK MATRIX 15
Rork ProjectsAnnexures [V02R03] – 2016 – 11
Page 1 of 16
1.0 Assessment Participants1.1 VenueRork Projects Head Office and Site Visits
1.2 Assessment Requested ByName: Shane Kennedy
1.3 Assessment Approved ByName: XXXX – State General Manager
1.4 FacilitatorMatrix Systems & Rork Projects
1.1 Attendees
Name Position Role in Risk Assessment Signature
XXXX State General Manager
Review and Approve HIRAC
XXXX Project Manager Participate and Review
XXXX Site Manager Participate and Review
Shane Kennedy Systems Manager Participate and Review
2.0 OverviewThe major hazard involved with this type of project is working at heights and electrical.
Known incidents on this type of project include:
Fall from heights
Falling Objects
Manual Handling
Slips, trips and falls
Electrical non conformances
Cuts and abrasions
Rork ProjectsAnnexures [V02R03] – 2016 – 11
Page 2 of 16
3.0 Scope of WorkWorks will include:
1) XXXX
4.0 ObjectiveThe objective of this assessment is to highlight and quantify the risks associated with Rork Projects operations.
This Risk Assessment has been conducted to ensure that all foreseeable risks have been assessed and adequate controls have been put in place to either eliminate or minimise the risks.
The Risk Assessment was undertaken using the Maximum Reasonable Consequence & Likelihood
5.0 ScopeThis risk assessment relates to activities associated with the Bourke Rd project managed by Rork Projects. The risk assessment will highlight those components of the works that require special attention to ensure the safety of all people involved, the protection of the environment and the quality of the works.
6.0 StakeholdersThis risk assessment applies to employees, suppliers, sub-contractors and visitors to the project who are associated with and have some interaction with the construction works.
7.0 Risk MethodologyA risk assessment using the Principals outlined in ISO 31000:2009 methodologies was conducted for the project operations in August 2016.
To assist in the identification of hazards, a team has reviewed applicable legislation, regulations, standards, codes of practice and associated, SWMS, JSA’s, other Risk Assessments, management plans, and accident/incident reports. Refer to Legislation Reference Retgister for a listing of applicable legislation, regulations, standards and codes of practice relevant to the project.
8.0 Risk Assessment SummaryNo hazards identified were deemed unacceptable with Rork Projects controls in place.
9.0 Risk ControlRegular review of the project management plan, Regular Site Inspections and Safety Observations/Spot Inspections, SWMS’s, hazard identification and frequent risk register reviews.
10.0 Person Responsible for Authorisation and Implementing Risk ControlRork Projects Project Management team.
Rork ProjectsAnnexures [V02R03] – 2016 – 11
Page 3 of 16
11.0 Method of monitoring implemented risk controls Regular Site Inspections,
Safety Audits;
Regular communication and consultation.
12.0 Nominated Trigger for a Review of the Risk Assessment Incidents and Injuries
Change in scope of work of design for the project
Environmental incident
13.0 Nominated Accountable Person to Review the Risk AssessmentRork Projects Management team in consultation with Matrix Systems.
14.0 Non-Consensus Matters
For documented evidence, this section verifies by signature, should consensus not be achieved. The concerns of dissenting persons must be detailed in the section below. (If all participants agree, this section is not applicable.)
Name Reason for Non Consensus Signature Date
15.0 Risk MatrixRefer to Appendix 1 & 2 that identifies the Risk Matrix structure used in this Risk Assessment.
16.0 Environmental Risk AssessmentRefer to Risk Register that identifies the Environmental Risk Assessment.
17.0 Workplace Risk AssessmentRefer to Risk Register resulting from the Principal Risk Assessment (PRA) that identifies the hazards and control measures to be implemented for this project. The risk register will provide more detail stemming from the initial Project Risk Assessment aimed at identifying, assessing and specifying minimum control measures to be implemented in accordance with the Hierarchy of control. For specific guidance on High Risk Work activities refer to the Hazard and Risk table section 20.0 and the High Risk Work Table in Section 23 of this document.
The Project Manager, Site Manager and WHSE Manager are encouraged to write additional information into the site specific column based on consultation with trades, SWMS reviews and as a result of conditions changing as the project progresses. These changes are discussed during the monthly PMP review.
The induction brief and site rules shall also be updated to include site-specific hazard and risk controls.
Rork ProjectsAnnexures [V02R03] – 2016 – 11
Page 4 of 16
Following hand over of the site specific PMP, the project team shall be inducted into the plan with particular reference to the PRA, risk register, site rules, induction brief and emergency procedures
which are updated during the PRA planning meeting so they are site specific.
18.0 External Documentation Review and Stakeholder engagementIdentify information available that is to be communicated to stakeholders. Consider WHS requirements, hazards and risks of the client and neighbouring properties/businesses, document below and include controls in the project risk register.
DocumentApplicable
Location and Method of CommunicationY N
Hazardous Material Survey/building reports
Asbestos Register
Design Risk Assessment
Client Brief/Drawings etc.
Building Hazard Registers
Other
Stakeholder Name(client, neighbours, public)
Company Contact Details Comments
Rork ProjectsAnnexures [V02R03] – 2016 – 11
Page 5 of 16
19.0 Potential Emergencies for the ProjectDuring the PRA, the project team is to update the emergency procedures so they are site specific. Where there is an emergency identified there must be a response procedure established applicable to the potential emergency scenario.
The site specific emergency procedures must be prominently posted on the site, communicated at induction and available at the time of an emergency. An evacuation drill, based on a potential emergency, is to be conducted at the commencement of the project and scheduled at 6 monthly intervals. Additional specific emergency scenario drills may be conducted at the discretion of the Site Manager in consultation with workers.
A review of the emergency response and emergency arrangements is conducted following each drill and also during monthly PMP reviews.
Procedures and emergency specific controls are outlined within Annexure F Emergency Procedures to deal with the potential emergency, which is site specific.
An evaluation of the first aid arrangements specific to project risks is to be conducted as a part of the Annexure F Emergency Procedures review and requirements assessed - detail within the Emergency Warning, Equipment and First Aid Checklist.
Note: following the establishment of the site specific emergency procedure, the trained Area Warden is to conduct a review of the suitability of the emergency procedures and equipment (documented
within the Emergency Warning Equipment and First Aid Checklist).
Rork ProjectsAnnexures [V02R03] – 2016 – 11
Page 6 of 16
20.0 Hazards and RisksTypical hazards/energy sources for consideration during the risk assessment, may include, but not be limited to:
Hazard Potential Harm Applicable Controls in Risk Register – Ref #
Manual Tasks Overexertion or repetitive movement can cause muscular strain
Gravity Falling objects, falls, trips of people can cause fractures, bruises, lacerations, dislocations, concussion, permanent injuries or death
Electricity Potential ignition source. Exposure to live electrical wires can cause shock, burns or death from electrocution
Machinery and equipment
Being hit by moving vehicles, or being caught by moving parts of machinery can cause fractures, bruises, lacerations, dislocations, permanent injuries or death
Hazardous Chemicals
Chemicals (such as acids, hydrocarbons, heavy metals) and dust (such as asbestos and silica) can cause respiratory illnesses, cancers, burns or skin irritants
Extreme Temperatures
Heat can cause burns, heat stroke or fatigue. Cold can cause hypothermia or frost bite
Noise Exposure to loud noise can cause permanent hearing damage
Radiation Ultra violet, welding arc flashes, micro waves and lasers can cause burns, cancer or vision impairment
Biological Micro-organisms can cause hepatitis, legionnaires disease, Q fever, HIV/AIDS or allergies
Psychosocial hazards
Effects of work related stress, bullying, violence and work-related fatigue
Public/Clients Workforce
Injury to member of the public or clients workforce as a result of unauthorized access or interaction.
The project team must review the Risk Register template and remove hazards and trade activities that are not relevant and add site-specific hazard/risk controls and information. The induction brief and site rules should also be updated to include site-specific hazard and risk controls.
Rork ProjectsAnnexures [V02R03] – 2016 – 11
Page 7 of 16
21.0 Health Surveillance/MonitoringRork Projects is to establish the provision for health surveillance for all workers who have been identified, as a part of the Principal Risk Assessment, as having a significant risk to their health as a result of their exposure to any of the following Hazards Substances listed in the table below. The type of health surveillance to be considered is listed in the second column of the table.
Tick applicable:
Hazardous Substance/Source
Type of health surveillance to be considered
Asbestos Demography, occupational and medical history and health advice. Physical examination if indicated. Records of personal exposure.
Crystalline silica Demography, occupational and medical history and health advice. Completion of a standardised respiratory questionnaire. Standardised respiratory function tests such as FEV1, FVC and
FEV1/FVC. Chest X-ray, full size PA view. Records of personal exposure.
Vibration Construction vibration monitoring may be required due to the nature of the works and the proximity to neighbouring structures.
Rork Projects will assess the need for Environmental monitoring during the initial planning stage and the review of the PRA.
Noise (refer 2.10 noise monitoring)
Radiation Exposure to the eyes causes ‘arc eye’ or ‘welders flash’ which is a painful inflammation of the cornea. The cornea can repair itself in one to two days, however, if the cornea becomes infected it may lead to some loss of vision. The worker must seek medical attention is symptoms present themselves.
Risk Register to be updated as applicable to specify health monitoring and surveillance requirements as agreed upon with – refer to NOHSC 7039 for guidance in relation to legislative requirements surrounding health surveillance for prescribed occupations/substances that may require mandatory surveillance.
Refer to WHS Regulation Schedule 11 for guidance if there is potential soil contamination or if a hazardous materials report indicates the presence of hazardous material.
Rork ProjectsAnnexures [V02R03] – 2016 – 11
Page 8 of 16
22.0 Equipment CalibrationEquipment that may be subject to calibration for this project has been identified below. Workers are advised via the project risk register and/or during induction of the requirement to carry out equipment calibration and maintenance and provide Project Management with records of equipment calibration. Where applicable, equipment must be calibrated by a NATA accredited assessor. Common types of construction measuring/test equipment that must be calibrated include the following:
Activity Tests RequiredNATA
Accredited Certification
Tick Applicable
Survey Theodolites, dumpy levels, EDMs etc.
Earthworks Compaction testing equipment, grading sieves
Piling Load measuring/stress/strain gauges
Concrete Manufacture Scales
Concrete Testing Load/stress gauges, water/moisture meters, destructing testing equipment
Steelwork Welding equipment, NDT equipment
Paintwork Thickness meters
Mech/Elec/etc Services
Pressure gauges, electrical instruments and meters, computer software, commissioning apparatus etc.
Air monitoring Dust/gas particle meters
Water monitoring Electronic pH meters, etc.
Noise/Vibration Sound level metres, ground-article velocity apparatus, etc.
Rork ProjectsAnnexures [V02R03] – 2016 – 11
Page 9 of 16
23.0 Temporary Works/Temporary Support Structures
Type Applicable Works Supervisor Competency
Specialist Contractor
engaged to assist with the design
and signoff of the structure
External Certification/
Inspection requirements &
Competency
Horizontal loads
Lateral Stability
Bracing/Propping
Formwork
Falsework
Jack extensions
Grillages
Proprietary Equipment
Scaffolding Manager Yes – Licensed Scaffolder
Licensed Scaffolder
Façade retention
Hoarding
ShoringExperience relevant to types of temporary works:
Has completed formal temporary works coordinator training.
Has a degree or formal qualification relevant to the type of temporary works.
Is a chartered civil/structural engineer.
Rork ProjectsAnnexures [V02R03] – 2016 – 11
Page 10 of 16
24.0 High Risk WorkThe risks associated with all High Risk Work as specified in the table below are to be identified, assessed and controlled in accordance with the Hierarchy of Control. Additional site-specific controls must be nominated within the Site Specific Controls column of the Project Risk Register against the relevant section.
Activity
Applicable to Project Requirement
Site Specific Controls (selected IAW hierarchy of
risk control)
Approved by Documents requiredYes No
Management of Risk of Fall >2m Hazards and control measures are the be listed
within the Project Risk Register to ensure the safest reasonably practical work methods are to be employed to eliminate the need to conduct work at height or effectively prevent the fall of people or materials.Subcontractors SWMS to nominate controls IAW the hierarchy of controls
*Risk of fall areas and safe access/egress nominated and marked on A3 site layout drawing.
Specific controls for managing the risk of fall from height (IAW hierarchy of risk control) must be individually listed and included in project risk register.
Rork Projects
Scaffold Designer
SWMS
Scaffolding Plan
Work on Telecommunications Tower
The WHS Plan/Risk Register identifies all hazards and assigns risks and controls to each identified hazard relating to the task. Subcontractors to submit detailed SWMS for the taskWork is to be coordinated with the electrical provider
Rork ProjectsElectrical Authority
SWMS
Demolition There is a demolition plan which identifies all hazards relating to this work task, and assigns risks and controls to each identified hazard.
A demolition permit is to be issued by the principal contractor which identifies all necessary supporting documentation and ensure a safe work environment is established and maintained.
A demolition permit is to be issued by the principal contractor which identifies all necessary supporting documentation and ensure a safe work environment is established and maintained.
Rork Projects Demolition Plan
Demolition PermitSWMS
Rork ProjectsAnnexures [V02R03] – 2016 – 11
Page 11 of 16
ActivityApplicable to Project Requirement Site Specific Controls
(selected IAW hierarchy of risk control)
Approved by Documents requiredYes No
Structural Alterations / temporary Support Structures
There is a demolition/construction plan which identifies all hazards relating to this work task, and assigns risks and controls to each identified hazard.
Scaffolding Plan is to be in place for any scaffold intended for use as a temporary support structure. Specific design risks for complicated scaffold designs are to be supported by a Design report which highlights design specifications.
Scaffolding Plan is to be in place for any scaffold intended for use as a temporary support structure. Specific design risks for complicated scaffold designs are to be supported by a Design report which highlights design specifications.
Rork Projects
Scaffold Designer/ Structural Engineer
Licenced Scaffold Contractor
Demolition PlanWHS PlanSWMS
Scaffolding Plan
Asbestos There is a demolition/construction plan which identifies assesses and controls all risks relating to the disturbance or removal of asbestos in accordance with the relevant legislation and statutory requirements
Rork ProjectsWorkSafe
Asbestos Removal PlanHAZMAT ReportSWMS
Confined Space Work There is a confined space risk assessment which identifies all hazards relating to this work task, and assigns risks and controls to each identified hazard. Permit System in place. Ticketed workers only to enter confined space.
Rork Projects Confined Space Risk Assessment and PermitConfined Space competency
SWMSTrenching or Excavation work >1.5 m
There is a trenching risk assessment, which identifies all hazards relating to this work task, and assigns risks and controls to each identified hazard. Permit System in place.
*Include Details of service searches
Rork Projects Trenching Risk AssessmentSWMSPermit
Use of Explosives There is a demolition/construction plan which identifies all hazards relating to this work task, and assigns risks and controls to each identified hazard
Rork Projects SWMS
Rork ProjectsAnnexures [V02R03] – 2016 – 11
Page 12 of 16
ActivityApplicable to Project Requirement Site Specific Controls
(selected IAW hierarchy of risk control)
Approved by Documents requiredYes No
Pressurized gas There is a demolition/construction plan which identifies all hazards and assigns risks and controls to each identified hazard.
Rork Projects WHS PlanRisk AssessmentSWMS
Construction work is being carried out on or near Chemical, Fuel or Refrigerant Lines
There is an appropriate WHS plan which identifies all hazards and assigns risks and controls to each identified hazard relating to the task. Subcontractors may be required to submit additional information as outlined in the WHS Plan/SWMS or Rork Projects risk register
*Include Details of service searches
Rork Projects WHS PlanRisk AssessmentSWMS
Construction work is being carried out on or near energized electrical installations or services
Refer Project Risk Register and Subcontractor SWMS *Include Details of service
searches, overhead power lines etc.
Rork Projects Project Risk RegisterSWMS
Contaminated/Flammable Atmosphere
Refer to Rork Projects risk register if applicable. Subcontractor SWMS to include suitable controls
Rork Projects SWMS
Tilt UpPrecast Concrete
The method of erecting the panels has been assessed and documented, and installation and bracing of such panels is in accordance with documented procedures compliant with AS3850 and specifications for proprietary items used
Rork Projects SWMSEngineer/supplier certificates
Work carried out adjacent to road, railway, shipping lane or other traffic corridor that is in use by traffic other than pedestrians
Traffic movement has been assessed and subsequent traffic management plans and controls have been established. Traffic management plans are approved by the relevant local authority
Rork Projects and Local Authority
Traffic Management PlanSWMS
Rork ProjectsAnnexures [V02R03] – 2016 – 11
Page 13 of 16
ActivityApplicable to Project Requirement Site Specific Controls
(selected IAW hierarchy of risk control)
Approved by Documents requiredYes No
Movement of Powered mobile plant
Licensed and Competent workers only to operate mobile plant. Subcontractor SWMS to include suitable controls. Rork Projects to verify inspection and maintenance records.
Rork Projects Plant Risk AssessmentLicense or Competency certificateSWMSInspection and Maintenance Records
Artificial extremes of Temperature
There is an appropriate WHS plan which identifies all hazards and assigns risks and controls to each identified hazard relating to the task. Subcontractors may be required to submit additional information as outlined in the WHS Plan/SWMS or Rork Projects risk register
Rork Projects SWMS
Work is being carried out at or near water or other liquid that involves a risk of drowning or Diving Work
There is an appropriate WHS plan which identifies all hazards and assigns risks and controls to each identified hazard relating to the task. Subcontractors may be required to submit additional information as outlined in the WHS Plan/SWMS or Rork Projects risk register
Rork Projects SWMS
Other as identified by project
Rork ProjectsAnnexures [V02R03] – 2016 – 11
Page 14 of 16
Appendix 1 Risk Matrix
How severely could it hurt someone?OrHow ill could it make someone?
How likely is it to be that bad?
1 – VERY LIKELYCould happen at any time
2 – LIKELYCould happen sometime
3 – UNLIKELYCould happen but very
rarely
4 – VERY UNLIKELYCould happen but
probably never will
A – Kill or cause permanent disability or ill health H1 H2 H4 M7
B – Long Term illness or serious injury H3 H5 M8 M11
C – Medical Attention and several days off work H6 M9 M12 L14
D – First Aid Needed M10 M13 L15 L16
HIGH 1 – 6
UNACCEPTABLE: STOP WORK IMMEDIATELY.
Work is not to proceed until controls are implemented to reduce the residual risk to Medium or Low. HRW SWMS required. Permit with applicable manager sign off as necessary. Provide ongoing monitoring and competent supervision of works.
MEDIUM 7 –13ONGOING MONITORINGRisk must be managed in line with As Low As Reasonably Practicable (ALARP). Risk assessment and Permit as required. Provide ongoing monitoring and competent supervision of works.
LOW 14 – 16ROUTINE MONITORING
No further action is required where residual risks are Low. However, ongoing monitoring is still required to ensure the risk does not escalate.
Rork ProjectsAnnexures [V02R03] – 2016 – 11
Page 15 of 16
Appendix 2 Environmental Risk MatrixStep 1: Determine Probability Step 2: Determine Consequences Step 3: Calculate the Risk
(Likelihood + Consequence = Level of Risk)ProbabilityLikelihood
PeopleConsequences
Business/ EnvironmentalConsequences
LikelihoodA B C D E
ACommon or Frequent occurrence likely to reoccur
1Fatality or permanent disability
Extreme damage extreme business interruption. Irreversible environment impact
Cons
eque
nce
1 E1 E3 E5 E7 S11
BHas happened before or a near miss has been recorded
2Serious Injury or illness (lost time)
High-level damage, significant business interruption. Serious environmental impact
2 E2 E4 E8 S12 M16
CCould occur or I have heard of it happening in the industry
3Disability or short term injury (lost time)
Medium level damage, serious production disruption. Reversible environmental impact
3 E6 E9 S13 M17 M20
DNot likely to occur within the business or industry
4Medical treatment injury Low level damage, slight
production disruption. Minor environmental impact
4 S10 S14 M18 L21 L23
EPractically impossible
5First Aid or no injury Negligible damage, minimal
production disruption. No environmental impact
5 S15 M19 L22 L24 L25
Key: Residual Risk Rating Action:
1 – 9 E Extreme Risk Rating 1 – 9 Extreme Risk Immediate action required – redesign/review
10 – 15 S Significant Risk Rating 10 – 15 Significant Risk Controls to reduce risk and monitoring required
16 – 20 M Moderate Risk Rating 16 – 20 Moderate Risk Controls to reduce risk and monitoring required
21 – 25 L Low Risk Rating 21 – 25 Low Risk Monitor as required
Rork ProjectsAnnexures [V02R03] – 2016 – 11
Page 16 of 16