Download - The role of valuation of ecosystem services for decision making & Methods of Economic Valuation
IWC7: pre-workshop on economic valuation, Bridgetown, 26-27 Oct 2013 1
The role of valuation of ecosystem services for decision making &
Methods of Economic Valuation
Eduard Interwies
IWC7: pre-workshop on economic valuation, Bridgetown, 26-27 Oct 2013
Decision making and ecosystem services valuation – general considerations
Valuation of Ecosystem Services- Ecosystem Services – concept & classification.- Different methodologies for ES evaluation.
Decision making and ES valuation – specific thoughts
2
Outline
IWC7: pre-workshop on economic valuation, Bridgetown, 26-27 Oct 2013
Paradigm shift from sectoral to ecosystem-oriented management approaches:
Economic perspective: treat, count & invest in water/marine/coastal ecosystems (ES) as elements of development infrastructure - as a stock of facilities, services & equipment needed for economic growth & for society to develop & function
So: maintain & improve ES to meet both today’s needs & those of intensifying demands & pressures in the future — just like any other component of infrastructure.
3
Background
IWC7: pre-workshop on economic valuation, Bridgetown, 26-27 Oct 2013
If one does not value ecosystems when taking decisions on allocating land, water & marine resources and investment funds: far-reaching economic costs possible…
In the past, ecosystem values – or the benefits of Ecosystem Services (ES) - have been almost ignored in decision-making. Reason: failure of markets that often do not to assign an economic value to the public benefits of ES, but attribute value to the private goods and services, which production may lead to ecosystem damage.
Let´s get a better picture of ES values & move towards better decision-making!
4
Background
IWC7: pre-workshop on economic valuation, Bridgetown, 26-27 Oct 2013
A variety of socio-economic factors need to be considered when taking policy decisions:
Economic growth needs/related investments;
Livelihood & distributional aspects
Costs and benefits of specific policy decisions
Cost-Benefit/Multi-criteria-analysis etc….
BUT ALSO: how does a decision influence the functioning of ES and the related values…
So, valuation of ES is “only” one part of socio-economic considerations for policy making! Important also for TDA-SAP process
5
ES & Decision making
IWC7: pre-workshop on economic valuation, Bridgetown, 26-27 Oct 2013 6
Valuation of Ecosystem Services
…can help to address:
• human well-being & ES• trade-offs between ES, conservation and other
priorities• a reduction of uncertainty: decision making is often
based on estimates, scenarios & incomplete knowledge; valuation is an additional factor in the attempt to gain the most complete picture
• evaluate interactions of ES with other determinants of human well-being
IWC7: pre-workshop on economic valuation, Bridgetown, 26-27 Oct 2013 7
Valuation of Ecosystem Services
Economic valuation of ES assesses both:
- the immediate economic gains („benefits“) of ecosystems (raw materials, food, clean water etc.)…
“provisioning services“ or “direct and indirect use values“;
- …but also benefits that are difficult to evaluate in monetary terms (landscape beauty, optional use for future generations, existence of biodiversity etc.).
“option values and non-use values“
IWC7: pre-workshop on economic valuation, Bridgetown, 26-27 Oct 2013
The classification into „provisioning services“, „regulating services“ etc. was developed initially in the Millenium Ecosystem Assessment (MA 2005), and slightly adapted/changed in the TEEB Report (De Groot et al. 2009)
8
Valuation of Ecosystem Services
IWC7: pre-workshop on economic valuation, Bridgetown, 26-27 Oct 2013 9
Classification of ES according to the TEEB Report:
IWC7: pre-workshop on economic valuation, Bridgetown, 26-27 Oct 2013
The classification into use and non-use values stems from the TEV (Total Economic Value) framework:
“The concept of the total economic value is a method of
creating a single monetary metric that combines all activities
within an LME [or river basin] and to express the levels of each
activity in units of a common monetary measure, such as US
dollars.” (Hoagland et al. 2006)
10
Valuation of Ecosystem Services
IWC7: pre-workshop on economic valuation, Bridgetown, 26-27 Oct 2013 11
Evaluation of Ecosystem Services
First Meeting of the Socio-Economic and Trade Working Group (SET WG), 16-18 September 2013, Dakar
IWC7: pre-workshop on economic valuation, Bridgetown, 26-27 Oct 2013 12
Valuation of Ecosystem Services
Generally, economic valuation of ES assesses the values derived from the existence and functioning of the relevant ecosystems!
Therefore: To be excluded/not an ES: extraction and mining of mineral resources/oil.
As – contrary to the idea of Ecosystem Services - the impact of extraction activities deteriorates the quality of ES and endangers their long-term provision!
Of course, such activities have to be considered when performing a socio-economic assessment of an LME/RB
IWC7: pre-workshop on economic valuation, Bridgetown, 26-27 Oct 2013 13
Methodologies for valuing ES:
IWC7: pre-workshop on economic valuation, Bridgetown, 26-27 Oct 2013
Methods used in the ES-valuation in the CCLME (ongoing – together with FAO) and GCLME (completed – with UNIDO)
Both studies aim at presenting a first rough estimation (“Just do it”!) of the value - for human wellbeing, social welfare and economic growth - of the Ecosystem Services provided by the Canary/Guinea Current Large Marine Ecosystem´s marine and coastal ecosystems…
Thus: do not what until all information is available (will never be…) but start with what is there, clearly indicating limitations and assumptions as well as main future work needed…get better over time!
14
Focus here
IWC7: pre-workshop on economic valuation, Bridgetown, 26-27 Oct 2013 15
Key Methodologies
* Market Prices
* Damage Avoided/Replacement Costs
* Benefit transfers (also from studies based on the Contingent Valuation Methods/CVM)
Of course: if one does a more detailed/specific study for a “hotspot”/specific issue, then also other methods become relevant (travel cost, choice experiments etc.)
IWC7: pre-workshop on economic valuation, Bridgetown, 26-27 Oct 2013 16
Market price method
• Applicable to direct use values• The value is an estimate from the price in
commercial markets.• Constraints: market imperfections (subsidies, lack
of transparency) which distort the market
IWC7: pre-workshop on economic valuation, Bridgetown, 26-27 Oct 2013 17
Damage cost avoided & replacement cost methods
• Applicable to indirect use values (e.g. coastal protection, erosion & pollution control, water retention etc.)
• Estimated by calculating the costs that would occur for building necessary infrastructures to replace the service (e.g. treatment plants) or by calculating the estimated damage of a hazardous event (storm).
• Main constraint: assumption that cost of avoided damage or substitutes match the original benefit; external circumstances may change the value of the original expected benefit, leading to under- or overestimates. Therefore: use with caution
IWC7: pre-workshop on economic valuation, Bridgetown, 26-27 Oct 2013 18
Contingent Valuation Method• Applicable e.g. to Tourism and Non-Use values• Important “for it´s own”, but also in Benefit Transfers,
see below• Asking people directly how much they would be willing
to pay for specific environmental services. Often the only way to estimate the non-use values. It is also referred to as a “stated preference method”
• Various sources of possible bias in the interview techniques. Plus: would people actually pay the amounts stated in the interviews? Nevertheless, it is one of the few ways to assign monetary values to non-use values of ecosystems that do not involve market purchases.
IWC7: pre-workshop on economic valuation, Bridgetown, 26-27 Oct 2013 19
Benefit TransferA transfer of valuation results from a specific „study site” to a different „policy site“ Advantages:• Cost- and labor-efficient (if no resources for various
own surveys)• Compensates (partly) fragmentary data availabilityConstraints: • Great number of uncertainties/inaccuracies:
situations are never identical• Dependability on quality of study site work• Unit value estimates can quickly become outdated
IWC7: pre-workshop on economic valuation, Bridgetown, 26-27 Oct 2013 20
Benefit TransferNevertheless: often best/only solution at hand, since lack of data/specific studies, so important for first rough estimations!
Steps:
Step 1: Identification of existing relevant data of other studies.
Step 2: Checking of transferability of this data:
- analysis of features and qualities of services.
- analysis of the quality of the study to be used.
Step 3: Adjusting the data to the policy site:
- calibration with existing data of the policy site (i.e. income level etc.).
Step 4: Calculation of the values of ES
IWC7: pre-workshop on economic valuation, Bridgetown, 26-27 Oct 2013 21
Linking results of first ES valuations to decision making
Upfront: “just” with an ES valuation study, it is not possible to make detailed decisions how the LME/River Basin needs to be developed/which projects to do, and which not
But it is possible to understand:
* which ecosystems have been underestimated in the past in regard to their social and economic benefits and
* that activities, which at a first glance appear to be economically profitable, provoke not only environmental damage but also cause significant economic loss.
Therefore, a first valuation exercise will help to identify explicit and also hidden trade-offs in the use of ES and other (economic) activities – and thus support decision making!
IWC7: pre-workshop on economic valuation, Bridgetown, 26-27 Oct 2013 22
Linking results to decision making •Since 1990ies: increasing importance of valuation studies•BUT: progress in practical application/use of results in natural resource use planning & decision making hasbeen slow;•Some possible reasons:
•practical integration of such valuation studies is a complex process - combined with a general lack of understanding &
knowledge regarding the importance of ES •various methodological issues e.g. for the valuation of
(mostly) non-market benefits jeopardize the credibility of/trust in this work!
•Studies often being “desk top” – little participation & ownership…
IWC7: pre-workshop on economic valuation, Bridgetown, 26-27 Oct 2013 23
Linking results to decision making
More specific,” hot-spot” oriented valuation studies will possibly be used more directly?
Overall (Berkes et al. (2007)):
"Resource management is at a crossroads. Problems are complex, values are in dispute, facts are uncertain, and predictions are possible only in a limited sense. The scientific system that
underlies resource management is facing a crisis in legitimacy and power. Top-down resource management does not work for a
multitude of reasons, and the era of expert-knows-best decision making is all but over“
Possible ways ahead: participation for “quality & ownership”; less quantitative, more qualitative results?
IWC7: pre-workshop on economic valuation, Bridgetown, 26-27 Oct 2013
Thank you!
Contact: [email protected]
24