The New, the Good, and the Desirable
Barriers and Opportunities for Social AppropriationSheila JasanoffHarvard UniversitySocial Appropriation of Science, Technology, and Innovation Universidad EAFIT, Medellin, October 20, 2007
10/20/10 Medellin-ASCTI 2
What innovation, whose appropriation? ASCTI: descriptive or normative?
Society does appropriate STI Society should appropriate STI
Conventional wisdom Blurs distinction Blames society for lack of uptake
Contrary view Normative theories of appropriation need to be made explicit, unpacked, and critiqued
10/20/10 Medellin-ASCTI 3
What Is Innovation? “Some men see things as they are and say why. I dream things that never were and say why not.” Ted Kennedy, quoting Robert F. Kennedy (1968)
But what have we learned since 1968? Even dreamers need resources to dream with.
Where do those resources come from? Who gets to do the dreaming?
10/20/10 Medellin-ASCTI 4
Social Contract The right to govern seen as a contract between ruler and ruled.
The people give up some rights but hold the king or ruler to responsible exercise of powers.
10/20/10 Medellin-ASCTI 5
The Social Contract for Science
Science--The Endless Frontier (1945)
Basic research as “pacemaker of technological progress.”
Contract: Funds and autonomy for science in exchange for innovation.
10/20/10 Medellin-ASCTI 6
Contractual Assumptions Central dogmas of US S&T policy after
WWII: More science = more innovation More innovation (in science) = more
social welfare National governments have a duty to
foster S&T innovation S&T are self-regulating institutions and
should be left free to set own agendas for innovation
Imperfections exist in the ideal contract, but they can be rectified by three mechanisms of governance (market, regulation, ethics)
10/20/10 Medellin-ASCTI 7
20th Century Technological Visions
10/20/10 Medellin-ASCTI 8
“Big Science”: A Brief History
Focal points: Weapons (Manhattan Project) Instruments (Sputnik, Hubble) Facilities (Superconducting Supercollider) Projects (war on cancer, moon landing, HGP)
Common elements National undertakings Not just science but also technology Big money Distinct (and tangible) endpoints
Assumptions Linear model: discovery, innovation, uptake States know what innovation is good for society
10/20/10 Medellin-ASCTI 9
An Innovative Moment – Buzz Aldrin’s Moon Landing
10/20/10 Medellin-ASCTI 10
Illustrations: 1950-1990 Privatization of nuclear power and “atoms for peace”
Expansion of National Institutes of Health
Establishment of National Science Foundation
Apollo Program and NASA Presidential ethics commissions (1970s-) Bayh-Dole Act (1980) Product framing of biotechnology (1984-)
10/20/10 Medellin-ASCTI 11
Changes in the Landscape Changing face of S&T: technoscience; “Mode 2”;
mission-oriented science; dual use technologies… Disasters and crises of confidence: Bhopal,
TMI, Chernobyl, Challenger, BSE, GM crops, 9/11, financial markets, research misconduct, “capital misconduct”…
Globalization of “the environment” New “convergent” technologies and their social
problems: nanotech, synthetic biology, robotics…
From managing risk to managing ignorance and uncertainty
10/20/10 Medellin-ASCTI 12
Missing Perspectives on Innovation Collaborative and reflexive research on hybrid (cross-disciplinary) knowledge
Long-term studies of Mode 2 knowledge-making: impacts, learning, and transformations
Social science paradigm shifts and “emergence studies”
Knowledge-making outside the lab Cross-cultural studies of science and policy Ethnographies of power (“studying up”) Failure and disaster studies
10/20/10 Medellin-ASCTI 13
Alternative visions for scholars Instrumental (for policy, for discipline) Give policymakers what they want Use opportunities for field development
Interpretive Explain what is going on Critique existing dominant understandings from other standpoints (S&T critics)
Normative Address what is to be done, but not (necessarily) from inside dominant policy framings
10/20/10 Medellin-ASCTI 14
New Frame: Co-Production
Making the worlds we study (e.g., global knowledge, populations [at risk], “geneticization,” digitization)
Focal points Emergence Controversy Intelligibility and portability (standardization) Cultures and practices of research (ethical assumptions)
Mechanisms Identities Institutions Discourses Representations
10/20/10 Medellin-ASCTI 15
Object: Publics Who are the publics the research intends to benefit, and are they included in research design?
How do relevant publics assess the need for more knowledge?
What are the attitudes of such publics with respect to knowledge (Luddites, passive consumers, active producers, patronized outsiders)?
When is consultation appropriate, and with/between/among whom?
10/20/10 Medellin-ASCTI 16
Innovating Forms of Life
10/20/10 Medellin-ASCTI 17
Assumptions of Competence
Innovator Imagined Publics
Gandhi Political competence
Martin Luther King Civic competence
Muhammad Yunus Economic competence
Tim Berners-Lee Reading competence
J.K. RowlingImaginative competence
Mark Zuckerberg Social competence
10/20/10 Medellin-ASCTI 18
Global Asymmetries Captive technological imaginations
Call centers Clinical trials
Liberated social imaginations Khadi movement Grameen Bank
Links and translations National Institutes of Health vs. Ashoka
10/20/10 Medellin-ASCTI 19
Constitutional Moments Formal constitutional amendments are rare in many countries
However, informal changes occur and can be constitutional in effect
Constitutional moments Redefine relations between states and citizens
in fundamental ways Change the terms and/or venues of public
reasoning and justification Reformulate epistemic rights and
responsibilities Are we at a constitutional moment for ASCTI
10/20/10 Medellin-ASCTI 20
US Case: Stirrings of Openness 1946 Administrative Procedure Act Historical context
New Deal struggles and compromises Courts, Congress, and the Presidency
Further developments Social movements and participatory engagements in the 1960s
NEPA (1969) and its environmental progeny
10/20/10 Medellin-ASCTI 21
Rights of the Knowledge-Able Citizen
Epistemic rights of citizenship in post-1960s United States: Right to know
• Of exposure to risks• For informed consumption• To level the economic and social playing field
Right to give informed consent Right to demand reasons Right to participate and offer expertise Right to challenge irrational decisions Right to appeal
10/20/10 Medellin-ASCTI 22
Privatization, Ethics, Engagement 1980s: a sea change
Deregulation End of bipolar world order Rise of neo-liberalism and “market fundamentalism”
Birth of public ethics Introduction of “public engagement”
Persistence of deficit model
10/20/10 Medellin-ASCTI 23
Is “public engagement” discourse a new constitutional moment? New language and concepts
Engagement (not participation), upstream, interactional
New problematizations of the “public” Empty signifier, deficit model, constructed interlocutor of the state, partner, “evidence-based”
New forums and processes Juries, consensus conferences, consultations, referenda
New horizons Anticipation, scenarios, futures
10/20/10 Medellin-ASCTI 24
What should we appropriate, and is “public engagement” the way to get it?
If it restores communication between emotion and intellect, affect and reason, imagination and argument
If it abandons procedures that have Bureaucratized technical reason Privatized values and emotions Delegated deliberation to experts (e.g., climate change)
If it restores Value conflicts to the public sphere Contestation among imaginations of the future Demote science to same level as other modes of democratic
imagination