1The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 1
The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method
Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration
2The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 2
The need to the limit flammability creates a need
to define and assess flammability exposure
assessdefine
3The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 3
What is Flammability?
• In order to define flammability, we first need to define:
• Flash point: The flash point of a flammable fluid is the lowest temperature at which the application of a flame to a heated sample causes the vapor to ignite momentarily, or “flash”, and is determined by a simple, standardized test.
• Lower Flammability Limit (LFL): At any point below the LFL, the fuel vapor/air mixture is too lean to burn.
• Upper Flammability Limit (UFL): At any point above the UFL, the fuel vapor/air mixture is too rich to burn.
4The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 4
• Previous work has shown that the LFL and UFL can be defined, in terms of temperature as:• LFL= (Flash Point - 10) - Altitude/808, • UFL=(Flash Point + 63.5) - Altitude/512
(where temperature is in Deg F and altitude is in ft.)
What is Flammability?
5The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 5
• Add a slide here that shows a plot of fuel temp bounded by LFL/UFL, showing flammable range
6The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 6
The need to the limit flammability creates a need
to define and assess flammability exposure
assessdefine
7The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 7
Background
• The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method (FTFAM) is an Excel© based macro based on work originally performed by the 1998 ARAC Fuel Tank Harmonization Working Group.
• It is a comparative analysis tool to examine airplane fuel tank flammability.
• The program utilizes Monte Carlo statistical methods to determine several unknown variables, using standardized distributions in order to calculate the fleet average flammability exposure time of a given fuel tank.
• From 1998 – Present, the FAA has utilized input from industry and information gained from various research activities to help refine and improve the model’s capabilities.
8The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 8
Basics of the Monte Carlo Method
• The Monte Carlo method is based on the use of random numbers and the statistics of probability to help solve problems that don’t yield to simple mathematics.
• Modeling of a problem is done by assigning random values, based on known distributions, to each unknown variable and calculating the results for that case.
• Computing the average results or range of results over a significantly large number of cases, then reduces any errors associated with the calculation.
9The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 9
Basics of the Monte Carlo Method (cont.)
• As a simple example of the Monte Carlo method, consider somebody rolling a six-sided die. • What is the probability of each of the numbers coming up, if the
die is rolled just one time?• If the die is rolled 6 times, what will the distribution of numbers
be?• How about if it’s rolled 100 times, 1,000 times, or 1,000,000?
• In theory, the more times the die is rolled, the less error that is associated with the resulting distribution of numbers.
To Try This and Other MC Examples Click on the Dice
10The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 10
Background (cont.)
• The FTFAM utilizes these techniques to generate values for several unknown variables, utilizing standardized distributions.• Fuel flashpoint temperature• Ambient ground temperature• Ambient cruise temperature• Flight mission length
• Additional functionality of the program:• Single flight analysis (for troubleshooting)• Random Number Freeze (for troubleshooting)• Warm day analysis• Flammability Reduction Method (FRM) effectiveness analysis
11The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 11
Program Overview – Flammability Analysis
Determination of Fuel Tank Flammability Exposure
Surrounding Environment
Mission Data
Fuel Properties
Fuel Tank Thermal Characteristics
Mission Length
Fuel Management
Mach Number
Flashpoint Temp.
Ambient Temp.
Total Air Temp.
Temp. Differential
Exp. Time Constants
Calculated by Monte Carlo
Method
Calculated by Monte Carlo
Method
Calculated by Monte Carlo
Method
Calculated by Monte Carlo
MethodUser Input User Input User Input User Input
Ambient Pressure
Calculated by Model
Number of
Engines
User Input
12The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 12
Program Overview – Surrounding Environment
13The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 13
Surrounding Environment – Ambient Temperatures
• Ground and Cruise Ambient temperatures are calculated through Monte Carlo Method using distribution data generated by the 1998 ARAC
• Ground Ambient• Mean Temperature = 59.95 °F
• Standard Deviation Below 50% = 20.14 °F
• Standard Deviation Above 50% = 17.28 °F
• Cruise Ambient• Mean Temperature = -70 °F
• Standard Deviation = 8 °F
14The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 14
15The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 15
Surrounding Environment – Ambient Temperatures
• With Ground and Cruise temperatures defined, we now need a method for computing the transition from ground to cruise
• To do so, several things must be understood and taken into account:• In general, the ambient temperature decreases with increasing
altitude. The rate of this decrease is referred to as the Temperature Lapse Rate.
• As altitude is increased, a point known as the Tropopause is reached. This is the boundary between the troposphere and stratosphere, and at this point there is no variation in ambient temperature. The tropopause ranges in height from 26,400 ft to 58,080 ft.
• When a cold ground ambient temperature exists, the initial temperature lapse rate can be significantly different than on warmer days. At times, it can even go positive, causing an increase in ambient temperature with altitude. This effect is referred to as a Cold Day Inversion.
16The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 16
Surrounding Environment – Ambient Temperatures
• The program uses the following calculations to define the standard temperature lapse rate:• When the altitude is less than 10,000 ft
• When the altitude is greater than 10,000 ft
• The model defines the tropopause as the point at which the ambient temperature reaches the pre-selected cruise temperature, and at this point cuts off the lapse rate and holds the ambient temperature constant.
altTT grndamb 57.3
75.3 ambamb TT
17The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 17
Surrounding Environment – Ambient Temperatures
• To deal with the issue of the cold day inversion, the program sets a different initial temperature lapse rate for flights with a ground ambient temperature less than 40 °F
• The lapse rate for these flights when the altitude is less than 10,000 ft is:
AltT
T gndamb
10
3.4
18The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 18
19The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 19
Surrounding Environment – Ambient Temperatures
• For the landing portion of the flight, the program uses the same temperature lapse rates, however selects a new ground ambient temperature to ramp towards.
• In addition, the program takes into account that on long duration flights, an aircraft is flying into a new climate, thus causing a change in cruise temperatures.
• To handle this, for flights where the flight time is greater than 2 hours, the program ramps to a new cruise ambient temperature over a 45 minute period, starting just after the midpoint of the cruise cycle.
20The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 20
21The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 21
Surrounding Environment – Ambient Pressure
• Ambient pressure is calculated through direct relationship with altitude
22The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 22
Program Overview – Mission Data
23The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 23
Mission Data – Number of Engines
• Number of Engines is a user input that is used by the program to calculate the climb rate of the aircraft.
• This climb rate also depends on the percentage of the flight time (randomly generated) to the maximum flight time of the aircraft.
# of Engines <20% <40% <60% <80% <100%
2 20 20 30 30 353 25 30 35 35 404 25 35 40 40 45
% of Maximum Flight Time
Time (minutes) To Reach Initial Cruise Altitude
24The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 24
Mission Data – Mission Length
• Mission Length for each flight is selected at random through the Monte Carlo method
• The distribution data that is used in the Monte Carlo selection process comes from data determined by the 1998 ARAC and varies depending on the maximum mission length of the aircraft.
• The data is generated as a percentage of total flights existing in each 200 nm block up to the maximum mission length of the aircraft.
25The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 25
Sample Mission Range Distributions Based on
Maximum Range
26The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 26
Mission Data – Fuel Management
• The quantity of fuel in the tank at any point during flight has a direct impact on the thermal effects which determine fuel temperature, and thereby tank flammability.
• The model uses the quantity of fuel in the tank as part of the thermal model to determine the change in tank thermal time constants throughout the flight.
• To do this, the model assumes a constant rate of fuel usage between the time at which the tank starts to burn fuel and the point at which it is empty.
• The model uses this assumption of a linear rate of fuel usage to generate a linear change in tank thermal time constants.
27The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 27
28The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 28
Mission Data – Mach Number
• The mach number at cruise is given by a user input• Mach number changes with altitude are defined as:
• Altitude < 10,000 ftMach = 0.4
• 10,000 ft Altitude < 30,000 ft
• Altitude 30,000 ftMach = Cruise mach number
4.020
4.010
cruiseMach
AltMach
29The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 29
30The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 30
Mission Data – Miscellaneous
• There are a number of additional assumptions that the program makes in order to develop the full mission profile:
• The descent rate used is the same for all flights and is 2500 ft/min down to 4000 ft and 500 ft/min below 4000 ft.
• Any changes in cruise altitude are treated by the program to be instantaneous.
• For very short duration flights of less than 50 minutes, the climb rate is set to be 1750 ft/min.
• Preflight ground time is defined by the following table
• Postflight ground time is 30 mins for all flights.
< 3 hrs
Between 3 and 4
hrs > 4 hrsPreflight Ground
Time30 mins 45 mins 90 mins
Flight Time
31The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 31
Mission Data – Miscellaneous
• Three different cruise altitude steps are allowed to be defined by the user. These are treated differently depending on the length of each flight as follows:
• Flight Times < 50 min – This is a short up/down flight and the first cruise altitude step is never reached. 40% of the flight time is allocated for climb, and 60% for descent.
• Flight Times Between 50 and 100 minutes – The flight cruises at the first altitude step and does not step to the other levels.
• Flight Times Between 100 and 200 minutes – Two altitude steps are used with the step increase occurring midway through the cruise time.
• Flight Times > 200 min – All three altitude steps are used with the cruise time equally split between them.
32The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 32
33The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 33
Program Overview – Fuel Properties
34The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 34
Fuel Properties – Flashpoint
• The Standard Specification for Aviation Turbine Fuels (ASTM D 1655), specifies a minimum flashpoint value of 100 °F for Jet A fuel.
• Similar standards for other aviation fuels also only specify a minimum value.
• In attempt to determine the actual flashpoint of jet fuel as used in service, the FAA conducted a study in which 293 samples were taken from both domestic and international flights. Results of this study are published in FAA report DOT/FAA/AR-07/30.
• The results of that study are used by the program to develop the standardized distribution of flashpoints from which a Monte Carlo analysis can be performed.
35The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 35
Mean = 120°F
Std Dev. = 8°F
36The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 36
Program Overview – Fuel Tank Thermal Characteristics
37The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 37
Program Overview - Fuel Tank Thermal Characteristics
• As the fuel tank is heated or cooled by a change in outside air temperature or by heat input from various engines/systems, the fuel temperature will increase or decrease respectively.
• The program assumes that the response of the fuel temperature to these changes follows an exponential decay law.
• This exponential trend is represented in the program by utilizing several exponential decay time constants and equilibrium temperatures that the fuel will eventually reach if given sufficient time.
• In order to determine these inputs, sufficient flight test data and analysis of the thermal behavior of the fuel tank is required.
38The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 38
Program Overview - Fuel Tank Thermal Characteristics
• For Ground Conditions, the input data required is:• Fuel temp., relative to ground ambient temp. that the fuel will
reach if given sufficient time.• Exponential time constant for a near empty fuel tank.• Exponential time constant for a near full fuel tank.
These inputs are required both for an engine on and engine off condition
• For Flight Conditions, the input data required is:• Fuel temp., relative to TAT that the fuel will reach if given
sufficient time.• Exponential time constant for a near empty fuel tank.• Exponential time constant for a near full fuel tank.
39The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 39
Program Overview - Fuel Tank Thermal Characteristics
• As discussed previously, the program assumes a linear rate of fuel usage, and therefore the time constant values move in a linear fashion from the tank full to tank empty values.
40The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 40
Program Overview - Fuel Tank Thermal Characteristics
• Using the tank thermal time constant and equilibrium temperature values, the program calculates the fuel temperature at each time step utilizing the following exponential decay law:
• This equation can also be used to solve for time constant input values, provided sufficient flight test data is obtained.
t
ifuelequil
ifuelifuel eTT
TT
11,
1,,
41The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 41
42The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 42
43The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 43
Program Overview - Fuel Tank Thermal Characteristics
• From this example, the following inputs are determined:• Equilibrium Fuel Temp. on the Ground = Ambient Temp.• Equilibrium Fuel Temp. in Flight = TAT – 25°F• Exponential Time Constant, Tank Near Full = 149.8• Exponential Time Constant, Tank Near Empty = 29.9
• A comparison then of the model outputs and flight test data must be made to ensure accuracy of these inputs.
44The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 44
45The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 45
46The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 46
Program Overview – Flammability Analysis
Determination of Fuel Tank Flammability Exposure
Surrounding Environment
Mission Data
Fuel Properties
Fuel Tank Thermal Characteristics
Mission Length
Fuel Management
Mach Number
Flashpoint Temp.
Ambient Temp.
Total Air Temp.
Temp. Differential
Exp. Time Constants
Calculated by Monte Carlo
Method
Calculated by Monte Carlo
Method
Calculated by Monte Carlo
Method
Calculated by Monte Carlo
MethodUser Input User Input User Input User Input
Ambient Pressure
Calculated by Model
Number of
Engines
User Input
47The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 47
Answers to Questions From Tuesday
1. What are the major differences between version 9a and 10 of the FTFAM? Are there user’s manuals available from each of the previous versions?• The major differences are the way in which the time constants are calculated throughout
the flight, but there were numerous other changes. A file is available which lists all of the differences, and this will be made available. Either way, the only acceptable version is 10.
2. What is the basis for the time constant of 3500 for calculating oxygen evolution?
• Change in Partial Pressure (PP) of O2 in fuel = (PP of O2 in Ullage - PP of O2 in Fuel) *(1-e^-t/tau)
• Based on gradients between ullage and liquid. So, by setting tau at 3500 you are saying that under quiescent conditions, the O2 is going to come out of the fuel very very very slowly. Setting it to 100 during climb creates a much more rapid evolution of O2 out of the fuel. This is what you would expect as the fuel now is being agitated. There is a report of O2 evolution and some tests ran (DOT/FAA/AR-05/25) These time constants were derived from comparing some of these calculations to the test data, doing some curve fitting. Also, one is not required to use these time constants, or this method for taking the O2 evolution effect into account. This is merely one method that is approved. If one is able to perform tests and validate some other way of modeling it, then they certainly can. Also, the GBI report had some additional data, that report # is DOT/FAA/AR-01/63.
48The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 48
Answers to Questions From Tuesday
3. Although both the ground and cruise ambient temperatures are chosen from a standardized distribution, are the two linked? For instance, if a ground ambient is a very hot temperature, would the cruise ambient be chosen as a warmer than usual temperature?• No, they are not linked...each is randomly generated
independent of the other. Remember, the temperature decays according to the defined lapse rate, so depending on the temperatures generated, the cruise temperature may never be reached.
4. What is the rational behind the discretization of the mission length histograms into 200 knot blocks?• No specific rationale for the 200 nm blocks...at least not that
we know of. Just how the data was broken down at ARAC, and then carried over to this version
49The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 49
Program Overview
• The program itself is split into several separate worksheets, which can be categorized as shown below.
• In all of these worksheets, a yellow cell denotes a user input cell.• Any cell not shaded yellow must remain unchanged by the user
unless approved by the FAA
50The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 50
Program Overview – Worksheet Descriptions
• Intro
Provides a brief statement of the model’s intended purpose as well as notes and limitations of its use.
• User Inputs & Results
Main interface of the FTFAM. This worksheet contains all user inputs necessary for performing a Monte Carlo flammability analysis as well as results from the analysis.
• Single Flight
Allows the user to simulate and evaluate a particular flight scenario, either by entering specific data or by selecting a flight from the MC analysis. Results from this single flight are also displayed here.
51The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 51
Program Overview – Worksheet Descriptions
• FRMAllows the user to evaluate the effectiveness of an FRM. It contains all necessary user inputs and the results for an FRM analysis. This worksheet is only needed if an FRM analysis is being conducted
• Summary of n CasesDisplays the results of each flight in tabular format, sorted by the percentage of flammable time.
• Internal Calculations WorksheetsThese four worksheets contain all of the essential information processed by the model. All data inputs, claculated values, and results are stored here for use by the program and/or user. These worksheets should not be modified by the user in any way, and information contained in them is provided to the user for troubleshooting purposes only.
52The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 52
User Inputs & Results Worksheet
53The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 53
FTFAM Usage - User Inputs
• User inputs for the program are divided into six categories• Airplane Data• Flight Data• Fuel Tank Usage Data• Body Tank Input Data• Tank Thermal Data• Multi-Flight Monte Carlo Data
54The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 54
FTFAM Usage - User Inputs
• User inputs for the program are divided into six categories• Airplane Data
• Maximum range of aircraft
• Number of engines
• OAT cutoff temperature
• Flight Data• Fuel Tank Usage Data• Body Tank Input Data• Tank Thermal Data• Multi-Flight Monte Carlo Data
55The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 55
FTFAM Usage - User Inputs
• User inputs for the program are divided into six categories• Airplane Data• Flight Data
• Cruise Mach number
• Tank ram recovery
• Cruise altitude steps
• Fuel Tank Usage Data• Body Tank Input Data• Tank Thermal Data• Multi-Flight Monte Carlo Data
56The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 56
FTFAM Usage - User Inputs
• User inputs for the program are divided into six categories• Airplane Data• Flight Data• Fuel Tank Usage Data
• Tank full/empty times
• Engine/equipment start time
• Body Tank Input Data• Tank Thermal Data• Multi-Flight Monte Carlo Data
57The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 57
FTFAM Usage - User Inputs
• User inputs for the program are divided into six categories• Airplane Data• Flight Data• Fuel Tank Usage Data• Body Tank Input Data (This refers to tanks completely enclosed in the
fuselage, or similar container with no direct cooling to ambient air)
• Is the tank in the fuselage?
• If yes, then what is the temperature of compartment surrounding tank?
• Is the tank pressurized?
• If yes, then what is the pressure differential?
• Tank Thermal Data• Multi-Flight Monte Carlo Data
58The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 58
FTFAM Usage - User Inputs
• User inputs for the program are divided into six categories• Airplane Data• Flight Data• Fuel Tank Usage Data• Body Tank Input Data• Tank Thermal Data
• Fuel temperature differentials relative to ambient• Exponential time constants (define how fuel heats/cools in
response to heat input)
• Multi-Flight Monte Carlo Data
59The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 59
FTFAM Usage - User Inputs
• User inputs for the program are divided into six categories• Airplane Data• Flight Data• Fuel Tank Usage Data• Body Tank Input Data• Tank Thermal Data• Multi-Flight Monte Carlo Data
• Number of Flights
• Random number freeze? (y/n)
• Warm day analysis? (y/n)
60The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 60
Program Overview - Main Calculations
61The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 61
62The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 62
63The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 63
FTFAM Usage - Outputs
• Monte Carlo Flammability Analysis• Table displaying the following
data for each flight (<5000):• Preflight ground time
• Flight time
• Ambient temperature
• Cruise temperature
• Fuel flashpoint temperature
• Amount of time that the tank was flammable
• % of flight time that the tank was flammable
• Table displaying warm day (ground ambient temperature > 80F) results
• Chart showing a summary of the Multi-Flight Monte Carlo Analysis
Fleet Average Flammability Exposure
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 200 400 600 800 1000
Mission NumberF
lam
mab
ilit
y- p
erce
nt
Fleet Average Flammability Exposure %
22.62%
64The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 64
FTFAM Usage - Outputs
• Single Flight Analysis• Time-based and altitude-based plots of fuel temperature, TAT,
LFL and UFL
Flammability studies
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
Time- minutes
Tem
per
atu
re-
Deg
F
0
20
40
60
80
100
tfuel
tat
LFL
UFL
Flammability %
Tank Flammable
Ambient and TAT Temperatures vs Altitude
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
-40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
Temperature Deg F
Alt
itu
de
100
0's
ft TAT
FuelTemp
LFL
UFLTank Flammable
65The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 65
FTFAM Usage – Modifications to the Program
• There are certain aspects of the program’s code that may need to be modified by the user based on acquired aircraft data.
• Fuel Management• As discussed previously, the program assumes a constant rate
of fuel usage, thereby resulting in a linear rate of change in the tank thermal time constants.
• It does not account for unique fuel management techniques, such as fuel transfer systems.
• If the linear decay model that the program uses does not adequately represent the fuel burn process, this portion of the program code can be modified.
• Any code modification must be shown, by flight test and a detailed analysis of the tank’s usage of fuel backed up by data, to provide an accurate representation of fuel usage by the tank.
66The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 66
FTFAM Usage – Modifications to the Program
• Tank Thermal Characteristics• As discussed previously, the thermal behavior of the fuel tank
due to its surroundings is based on calculations using the fuel temperature differential relative to ambient temperature and TAT, as well as the exponential tank thermal time constants.
• If flight test data and a detailed analysis of the tank’s thermal behavior shows that this method cannot yield an accurate representation of the actual fuel temperature profile, then this portion of the program code can be modified.
• Any code modification must be shown, by flight test and a detailed analysis of the tank’s thermal behavior backed up by data, to provide an accurate representation of the fuel temperature profile.
67The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 67
FTFAM Usage – Modifications to the Program
68The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 68
The latest version of the FTFAM and its associated
User’s Manual can be downloaded at the
FAA’s Fire Safety Section Website at:
http://www.fire.tc.faa.gov/systems/fueltank/FTFAM.stm
Any updates to either the FTFAM or its associated User’s Manual will be posted in the Federal Register
69The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 69
Example* – Heated Center Wing Tank
• Consider an example aircraft with a heated center wing tank (CWT). The aircraft has 4 engines, a maximum range of 10,000 nm, and is designed to fly with a typical cruise speed of mach 0.81. A flight test is flown to determine the CWT’s thermal characteristics.
Click Here to Open a Spreadsheet with Sample Data and Calculations to Determine Inputs to the FTFAM
• The following slides show screenshots of the FTFAM displaying inputs to the program based on this data as well as a comparison of the calculated results to the sample flight data results.
*note that this example, or any other contained within this presentation, do not represent any particular aircraft or fuel tank configuration, and any data provided is for
demonstration purposes only.
70The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 70
71The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 71
Single-Flight Conditions1320 max
Flight time 398.0 MinutesT.O. Ambient Temp 80.0 Deg F Flammability ExposureEarly Cruise Ambient -63.6 Deg F 80.31 %Late Cruise Ambient* -63.6 Deg FLanding Ambient* 80.0 Deg FFlash Point 115.0 Deg F
Run selected flight from Monte Carlo as a single flightEnter Case number
Flammability studies
-40-20
020406080
100120140160180200
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
Time- minutes
Tem
pera
ture
- Deg
F
0
20
40
60
80
100
Fuel Temp
TAT
LFL
UFL
Flammability %
Ambient and TAT Temperatures vs Altitude
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
-60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
Temperature Deg F
Alti
tude
100
0's
ft
TAT
FuelTemp
LFL
UFL
Run Single Flight
Run Selected Flight
Return to Input page
72The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis
Federal AviationAdministration 72