![Page 1: The Fragility of interdependency: Coupled networks and switching phenomena Sergey Buldyrev Department of Physics Yeshiva University Collaborators: Gabriel](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062714/56649d155503460f949ea5b6/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The Fragility of interdependency: Coupled networks and switching phenomena
Sergey BuldyrevDepartment of Physics
Yeshiva UniversityCollaborators:
Gabriel Cwilich (YU), Nat Shere(YU),Shlomo Havlin (BIU), Roni Parshani (BIU), Antonio Majdandzic,
Jianxi Gao, Gerald Paul, Jia Shao, and
H. Eugene Stanley(BU)Thanks to DTRA
![Page 2: The Fragility of interdependency: Coupled networks and switching phenomena Sergey Buldyrev Department of Physics Yeshiva University Collaborators: Gabriel](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062714/56649d155503460f949ea5b6/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
![Page 3: The Fragility of interdependency: Coupled networks and switching phenomena Sergey Buldyrev Department of Physics Yeshiva University Collaborators: Gabriel](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062714/56649d155503460f949ea5b6/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Electricity, Communication,TransportWater …..
Two types of links:ConnectivityDependency
For want of a nail the shoe was lost.For want of a shoe the horse was lost.For want of a horse the rider was lost.For want of a rider the battle was lost.For want of a battle the kingdom was lost.And all for the want of a horseshoe nail.
• Modern systems are coupled together and therefore should be modeled as interdependent networks.
• Node in A fails node in B fails
• Node in B fails node in C fails
• This leads to the cascade of failures
![Page 4: The Fragility of interdependency: Coupled networks and switching phenomena Sergey Buldyrev Department of Physics Yeshiva University Collaborators: Gabriel](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062714/56649d155503460f949ea5b6/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
The modelof mutual percolation
Giant component of network A at the I stage of the cascade
Giant component of network B at the II stage of the cascade
![Page 5: The Fragility of interdependency: Coupled networks and switching phenomena Sergey Buldyrev Department of Physics Yeshiva University Collaborators: Gabriel](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062714/56649d155503460f949ea5b6/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Blackout in Italy (28 September 2003)
CASCADE OF FAILURES
Railway network, health care systems, financial services, communication systems
Power grid
InternetSCADA
Cyber Attacks-CNN Simul.02/10
Rosato et allInt. J. of Crit.Infrastruct. 4,63 (2008)
![Page 6: The Fragility of interdependency: Coupled networks and switching phenomena Sergey Buldyrev Department of Physics Yeshiva University Collaborators: Gabriel](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062714/56649d155503460f949ea5b6/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
SCADA
Power grid
Blackout in Italy (28 September 2003)
SCADA=Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition
![Page 7: The Fragility of interdependency: Coupled networks and switching phenomena Sergey Buldyrev Department of Physics Yeshiva University Collaborators: Gabriel](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062714/56649d155503460f949ea5b6/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Blackout in Italy (28 September 2003)
Power grid
SCADA
![Page 8: The Fragility of interdependency: Coupled networks and switching phenomena Sergey Buldyrev Department of Physics Yeshiva University Collaborators: Gabriel](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062714/56649d155503460f949ea5b6/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Blackout in Italy (28 September 2003)
Power grid
SCADA
![Page 9: The Fragility of interdependency: Coupled networks and switching phenomena Sergey Buldyrev Department of Physics Yeshiva University Collaborators: Gabriel](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062714/56649d155503460f949ea5b6/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Robustness of a single network: PercolationRemove randomly (or targeted) a
fraction 1-p nodes
ER: 1/
SF, ( ) (2 3) :
0 very robust
c
c
p k
p k k
p
FOR RANDOM REMOVAL
ORDER PARAMETER:
μ∞(p) Size of the largest
connected component (cluster)
2nd order
(ER) (SF)
Broader degree-more robust
Breakdown threshold cp
μ∞(p) can be expressed in terms ofgenerating functions of the degreedistribution
![Page 10: The Fragility of interdependency: Coupled networks and switching phenomena Sergey Buldyrev Department of Physics Yeshiva University Collaborators: Gabriel](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062714/56649d155503460f949ea5b6/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
In the infinite randomly connected networks, the probability of loops is negligible. These networks can be modeled as branching processes in which each open link of a growing aggregate is randomly attached to a node with k-1 outgoing links with a probability kP(k)/<k>, where P(k) is the degree distribution.For the branching processes the apparatus of generating functions is applicable.
![Page 11: The Fragility of interdependency: Coupled networks and switching phenomena Sergey Buldyrev Department of Physics Yeshiva University Collaborators: Gabriel](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062714/56649d155503460f949ea5b6/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Generating Functions
![Page 12: The Fragility of interdependency: Coupled networks and switching phenomena Sergey Buldyrev Department of Physics Yeshiva University Collaborators: Gabriel](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062714/56649d155503460f949ea5b6/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
![Page 13: The Fragility of interdependency: Coupled networks and switching phenomena Sergey Buldyrev Department of Physics Yeshiva University Collaborators: Gabriel](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062714/56649d155503460f949ea5b6/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
RANDOM REMOVAL – PERCOLATION FRAMEWORK
Equivalent to random removal
Nodes in the giantcomponent
Nodes in the giantcomponent
Equivalent to random removal
Nodes left afterinitial random removal
Nodes in the giantcomponent
![Page 14: The Fragility of interdependency: Coupled networks and switching phenomena Sergey Buldyrev Department of Physics Yeshiva University Collaborators: Gabriel](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062714/56649d155503460f949ea5b6/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Recursion Relations
=pgA(y)gB(x)
![Page 15: The Fragility of interdependency: Coupled networks and switching phenomena Sergey Buldyrev Department of Physics Yeshiva University Collaborators: Gabriel](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062714/56649d155503460f949ea5b6/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Graphical solution for SF networks
Our model predicts the existence of the all or nothing, first order phase transition, in the vicinity of which failure of a small fraction of nodes in one of the networks may lead to completedisintegration of both metworks
![Page 16: The Fragility of interdependency: Coupled networks and switching phenomena Sergey Buldyrev Department of Physics Yeshiva University Collaborators: Gabriel](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062714/56649d155503460f949ea5b6/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
n
after n-cascades of failures
Catastrophic cascadesjust below cp
For a single network 1/cp k
ER networkSingle realizations
RESUTS: THEORY and SIMULATIONS: ER Networks
Removing 1-p nodes in A
( 1)/21/ (2 (1 )); e f fcp k f f f
20.28467, 2.4554 / ; (1 )c cf p k P p f
2.45 / cp k p
FIRST ORDER TRANSITION
min1, 2.4554k
μn(p)
![Page 17: The Fragility of interdependency: Coupled networks and switching phenomena Sergey Buldyrev Department of Physics Yeshiva University Collaborators: Gabriel](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062714/56649d155503460f949ea5b6/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Probability of existence of mutual giant component for ER
![Page 18: The Fragility of interdependency: Coupled networks and switching phenomena Sergey Buldyrev Department of Physics Yeshiva University Collaborators: Gabriel](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062714/56649d155503460f949ea5b6/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
PDF of number of cascades n at criticality for ER of size N
1/4n N
![Page 19: The Fragility of interdependency: Coupled networks and switching phenomena Sergey Buldyrev Department of Physics Yeshiva University Collaborators: Gabriel](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062714/56649d155503460f949ea5b6/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
IN CONTRAST TO SINGLE NETWORKS, COUPLED NETWORKS ARE MORE VULNERABLE WHEN DEGREE DIST. IS BROADER
All with 4k
Buldyrev, Parshany, Paul, Stanley, S.H. Nature 2010
![Page 20: The Fragility of interdependency: Coupled networks and switching phenomena Sergey Buldyrev Department of Physics Yeshiva University Collaborators: Gabriel](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062714/56649d155503460f949ea5b6/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Networks with correlated degrees
• Why coupled networks with broadrer degree distribution are more vulnerable?
• Because “hubs” in one network can depend on isolated nodes in the other.
• What will happen if the hubs are more likely to depend on hubs?
• This situtation is probably more realistic.
![Page 21: The Fragility of interdependency: Coupled networks and switching phenomena Sergey Buldyrev Department of Physics Yeshiva University Collaborators: Gabriel](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062714/56649d155503460f949ea5b6/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Identical degrees of mutually dependent nodes
Randomly coupled networks:
Correspondenty coupled networks:
PRE 83, 016112 (2011)
![Page 22: The Fragility of interdependency: Coupled networks and switching phenomena Sergey Buldyrev Department of Physics Yeshiva University Collaborators: Gabriel](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062714/56649d155503460f949ea5b6/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Indeed, for CCN the networks the robustness increases with the broadness of the degree distribution.
CCN are more robust than RCN with the same degree distribution
For CCN with 2<<3 pc=0 as
for single networks, and the transition becomes of the second order
For =3,
![Page 23: The Fragility of interdependency: Coupled networks and switching phenomena Sergey Buldyrev Department of Physics Yeshiva University Collaborators: Gabriel](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062714/56649d155503460f949ea5b6/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
GENERALIZATION: PARTIAL DEPENDENCE: Theory and Simulations
P
Parshani, Buldyrev, S.H.PRL, 105, 048701 (2010)arXiv:1004.3989
Strong q=0.8:1st Order
Weak q=0.1:2nd Order
q-fraction of dependency links
![Page 24: The Fragility of interdependency: Coupled networks and switching phenomena Sergey Buldyrev Department of Physics Yeshiva University Collaborators: Gabriel](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062714/56649d155503460f949ea5b6/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Strong Coupling Weak Coupling
P P
q=0.8 q=0.1
![Page 25: The Fragility of interdependency: Coupled networks and switching phenomena Sergey Buldyrev Department of Physics Yeshiva University Collaborators: Gabriel](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062714/56649d155503460f949ea5b6/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Analogous to critical point in liquid-gas transition:
PARTIAL DEPENDENCE
![Page 26: The Fragility of interdependency: Coupled networks and switching phenomena Sergey Buldyrev Department of Physics Yeshiva University Collaborators: Gabriel](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062714/56649d155503460f949ea5b6/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Network of Networks
Jianxi Gao et al (arXiv:1010.5829)
n=5
For ER, , full coupling , ALL loopless topologies (chain, star, tree):
Vulnerability increases significantly with m
m=1 known ER- 2nd order
1/cp k
P
ik k
m=1
m=2
m=5
m
{
![Page 27: The Fragility of interdependency: Coupled networks and switching phenomena Sergey Buldyrev Department of Physics Yeshiva University Collaborators: Gabriel](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062714/56649d155503460f949ea5b6/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Multiple random support links
Removal of 1-pA from network A
Removal of 1-pB from network B
Degree distribution support links from A to B is PAB(k)
Degree distribution support links from B to A is PBA(k)
Fraction of autonomous nodes in B is 1-qAB
Fraction of autonomous nodes in A is 1-qBA
![Page 28: The Fragility of interdependency: Coupled networks and switching phenomena Sergey Buldyrev Department of Physics Yeshiva University Collaborators: Gabriel](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062714/56649d155503460f949ea5b6/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Most general case of network of networks
qji fraction of nodes in i which depends on j
Gji generation function of the Degree distribution of the support links
from j to i
![Page 29: The Fragility of interdependency: Coupled networks and switching phenomena Sergey Buldyrev Department of Physics Yeshiva University Collaborators: Gabriel](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062714/56649d155503460f949ea5b6/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Summary and Conclusions
• First statistical physics approach --mutual percolation-- for Interdependent Networks—cascading failures
• Generalization to Partial Dependence: Strong coupling: first order phase transition; Weak: second order
• Generalization to Network of Networks: 50ys of classical percolation is a limiting case. E.g., only m=1 is 2nd order; m>1 are 1st order
• Extremely vulnerable, broader degree distribution - more robust in single network becomes less robust in interacting networks
Network A
Network B
Rich problem: different types ofnetworks and interconnections. Buldyrev et al, NATURE (2010)Parshani et al, PRL (2010);arXiv:1004.3989
![Page 30: The Fragility of interdependency: Coupled networks and switching phenomena Sergey Buldyrev Department of Physics Yeshiva University Collaborators: Gabriel](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062714/56649d155503460f949ea5b6/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Conclusions• Interdependent networks are more vulnerable than
independent networks. They disintegrate via all-or-nothing, first order, phase transition.
• Among the interdependent networks with the same average degree the networks with broader degree distribution are the most vulnerable.
• Scale free interdependent networks with 2<λ<3 have non-zero pc
• Our model allows many generalizations: more than two interdependent networks; some nodes are independent, some nodes depend on more than one node, networks embedded in d dimensions, etc.
• Analytical solutions exists for the case of randomly connected uncorrelated networks with arbitrary degree distributions. They are important because they give us general phenomenology as van der Waals does.
![Page 31: The Fragility of interdependency: Coupled networks and switching phenomena Sergey Buldyrev Department of Physics Yeshiva University Collaborators: Gabriel](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062714/56649d155503460f949ea5b6/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Switching in the dynamic Watts opinion model
![Page 32: The Fragility of interdependency: Coupled networks and switching phenomena Sergey Buldyrev Department of Physics Yeshiva University Collaborators: Gabriel](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062714/56649d155503460f949ea5b6/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
(1) Visit every node in the network. Set its internal state to ”0”, with probability p. This
part simulates the failures of internal integrity.
(2) Visit every node in the network for the second time. For each node found in internalstate ”0”, we check the time elapsed from its last internal failure. If that time is equal to
τ, the node’s internal state becomes ”1”. This part simulates recovery of internalintegrity from a failure after recovery time has elapsed.
(3) Now we check the neighborhood of each node i. If a node i has more then m neighbors with total state active, we set its external state to ”1”. In contrast, if a node has
less or equal to m active neighbors, with probability p2 the node i is set to have external
state ”0” and with probability 1 − p2 it is set to have external state ”1”.
(4) Determine new total states of nodes, using Table 1. These are used in the next iteration (t + 1).
Rules of the game
![Page 33: The Fragility of interdependency: Coupled networks and switching phenomena Sergey Buldyrev Department of Physics Yeshiva University Collaborators: Gabriel](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062714/56649d155503460f949ea5b6/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Hysteresis
![Page 34: The Fragility of interdependency: Coupled networks and switching phenomena Sergey Buldyrev Department of Physics Yeshiva University Collaborators: Gabriel](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062714/56649d155503460f949ea5b6/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Switching Phenomena
![Page 35: The Fragility of interdependency: Coupled networks and switching phenomena Sergey Buldyrev Department of Physics Yeshiva University Collaborators: Gabriel](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062714/56649d155503460f949ea5b6/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Simulations of ST2 water near the liquid-liquid critical point