The expanding universe
Lecture 1
The early universechapters 5 to 8chapters 5 to 8
Particle Astrophysics , D. Perkins, 2nd edition, Oxford
5. The expanding universe6 Nucleosynthesis and baryogenesis6. Nucleosynthesis and baryogenesis7. Dark matter and dark energy components8. Development of structure in early universe
Expanding universe : content• part 1 : ΛCDM model ingredients: Hubble flow, cosmological principle, geometry of universe
• part 2 : ΛCDM model ingredients: dynamics of expansion, energy density components in universe
• Part 3 : observation data – redshifts, SN Ia, CMB, LSS, light element abundances ‐ ΛCDM parameter fits
• Part 4: radiation density, CMB• Part 5: Particle physics in the early universe, neutrino density
• Part 6: matter‐radiation decoupling• Part 7: Big Bang Nucleosynthesis• Part 8: Matter and antimatter
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 3
The ΛCDM cosmological model• Concordance model of cosmology – in agreement with all observations = Standard Model of Big Bang cosmology
• ingredients:
Universe = homogeneous and isotropic on large scalesUniverse = homogeneous and isotropic on large scales
Universe is expanding with time dependent rate
Started from hot Big Bang, followed by short inflation period
Is essentially flat over large distances
Made up of baryons, cold dark matter and a constant darkade up o ba yo s, co d da atte a d a co sta t daenergy + small amount of photons and neutrinos
Dark energy is related to cosmological constant ΛDark energy is related to cosmological constant Λ
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 4
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 5
Lecture 3
Lecture 1re 2
Lectur
Lecture 3
Expanding Universe lect1 6© Rubakov
2013‐14
Lecture 4
Part 1Part 1ΛCDM ingredientsgHubble expansion – redshiftp
Cosmological principle
Geometry of the universe Robertson Walker metricGeometry of the universe – Robertson‐Walker metric
Some distances• Earth‐Sun = AU = 150 x 109 m = 150 x M km• Lightyear = Ly = 0.946 x 1016 m• 1 year = 31.5 106 s• parsec = pc = 3.3 Lyparsec pc 3.3 Ly• Mpc = 3.3 MLy• Radius Milky Way ª 15 kpc
ruler in cosmologyi O(M )• Radius Milky Way ª 15 kpc
• Sun to centre MW ª 8 kpcA d d l (M31) t th 800 k
is ~ O(Mpc)
• Andromeda galaxy (M31) to earth ª 800 kpc• Width Local Group of ª 30 galaxies ª 2 Mpc• Average inter‐galactic distance ªMpc• highest redshift observed : dwarf galaxy at z ª 11
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 8
Hubble law 1• Hubble(1929): spectral lines of distant galaxies are redshiftedfi galaxies move away from Earth
• Receding velocity increases with distance : Amount of shift Dl depends on apparent brightness (~distance D) of galaxyDl depends on apparent brightness ( distance D) of galaxy
Original Hubble plot
m/s) SuperNovae
Ia and II
elocity
(km
Ve
Cepeids
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 9Distance (Mpc)
Hubble law 2• Interpret redshift z as Doppler effect
• For relativistic objectsFor relativistic objects
( )11 11
obs emobs em em
βλ λ βλ λ λ βλ β− +
= = ⎯⎯⎯→ +Δλz =λ
• For close‐by objects, in non‐relativistic limit
( )1emλ β−λ
1 1obs
em
vz zc
λ β βλ
+ = ≈ + → ≈ =
• Hubble law becomes linear relation between velocity and Distance
em
H DDistance0z c v H D≈ =
• Confirms theories of Friedmann and Lemaître2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 10
Hubble law 3• H0 = Hubble constant today – best direct estimate (HST,
WFC3) t today=( ) ( )0 0( ) 73.8 2.4 km/sec /MpcH H t= = ±
• If H(t) is same at all times→ constant and uniform
0t today=0 100 / sec/ 0.738 0.024H km Mpc h h= → = ±i
• If H(t) is same at all times → constant and uniformexpansion
Ob ti h th t i t t t d• Observations show that expansion was not constant and that Hubble ‘constant’ depends on time
• Expansion rate evolves as function of changing energy‐matter density of universe (see Friedman equations)
( ) ( )( )( )
2
28
3NG c
R ttπ
= −2H t ktotρ
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 11
( )( )3 R t
Sources of redshift• Motion of object with respect to observer – Doppler effect(red and blue shifts): e.g. rotation of stars in galaxies – seegalaxy rotation curves (dark matter)
• Gravitational redshift : stretching of wavelength close toGravitational redshift : stretching of wavelength close to heavy object ‐ local effect – negligible over long distances
• Cosmological redshift : stretching of wavelength due to• Cosmological redshift : stretching of wavelength due to expansion of universe – dominant at high redshifts
( )( )
( )( )
0 01 obs t R tz
t R tλλ
+ = = R(t)=Scale of universe at time t( ) ( )em t R tλ
Also called a(t)
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 12
Cosmological redshift - time • Redshift is the measured quantity – it is related to a giventime during the expansion
• Large z means small t , or early during the expansion
0t t t0tz== ∞
0
0t tz==
todayBigBang
• Actual (proper) distance D from Earth to distant galaxy attime t
• D can only be measured for nearby objects( ) ( )D t r= ⋅R t
ca o y be easu ed o ea by objects
• r = co‐moving coordinate distance – in reference frame co‐moving with expansionmoving with expansion
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 13
Cosmological principle - large scales• universe is isotropic and homogeneous at large scales
• There is no preferred position or direction
• Expansion is identical for all observers
• Is true at scale of inter‐galactic distances : O(Mpc)
•2dF quasar surveyq y•Two slices in declination and right Rig
ascention•Plot redshift vs right ascension
ght ascenascension•Each dot = galaxy
nsion
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 14
Equatorial coordinates
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 15
Cosmic Microwave Background photons
WMAP 5 years data ‐ 2.75°K skyUniform temperature up to ΔT/T ~ 10‐5Uniform temperature up to ΔT/T 10
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 16
Cosmic Microwave Background photonsPLANCK 4 years of data – 2.75°K skyUniform temperature up to ΔT/T ~ 10‐5
© NASA ESA
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 17
© NASA, ESA
Structures - small scales• Over short distances universe is clumpy• Galaxy clusters O(10 Mpc) diameter• galaxies, eg Milky Way : 15 kpc COMA cluster: 1000 galaxies
20Mpc diameterM74 IR
p100 Mpc(330 Mly) from EarthOptical + IR
M74‐ IR
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 18
Milky WayCOBE ‐ radio
Olbers’ paradox• Olber (~1800): Why is the sky not bright at night?
• Suppose that universe is unlimited & filled uniformly withSuppose that universe is unlimited & filled uniformly withlight sources (stars) ‐ total flux expected is ~ rmax
The sky does not look dark because:The sky does not look dark because:
• Observable universe has finite age – for constant i li ht h f i O( t )expansion: light can reach us from maximum rmax = O(ct0 )
• Stars emit light during finite time Dt – flux reduced by factor Δt/t0
• Light is redshifted due to expansion ‐ eg red light Æ IR –finally undetectable flows
• CMB fills universe – dark matter does not light upg p
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 19
Robertson-Walker metric 1assume universe = homogeneous and isotrope fluid
• Distance between 2 ‘events’ in 4‐dimensional space‐timeDistance between 2 events in 4 dimensional space time
2 2 2 2 2 2ds c dt dx dy dz⎡ ⎤= − + +⎣ ⎦Co‐movingdistance dr
Universe is expanding
⎣ ⎦ distance dr
• scale factor R(t), identical at all locations, only dependenton time ( )22 2 2 2 2 2ds c dt dx dy dz⎡ ⎤= + +⎣ ⎦R ︵t ︶
• proper distance D from Earth to distant galaxy at time t
( )ds c dt dx dy dz⎡ ⎤= − + +⎣ ⎦R ︵t ︶• proper distance D from Earth to distant galaxy at time t
( ) ( )D t r= ⋅R t• r = co‐moving coordinate distance2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 20
Stretching of the universe scaleExample: closed universe
R(t1) R(t2)
© L B t ö
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 21
© L. Bergström
Robertson-Walker metric 2space is not necessarily flat
• Introduce k = spatial curvature of universeIntroduce k spatial curvature of universe
• Distance between 2 events in 4‐dim space‐time
⎡ ⎤( ) ( )2
2 2 2 2 2 2 22 sin
1drds c dt r d d
rθ θ φ
⎡ ⎤= − + +⎢ ⎥−⎣ ⎦k
2R t
• k : curvature of space→ geometry – obtained from
⎣ ⎦
k : curvature of space geometry obtained fromobservations – can be ‐1,0,1
• R(t) : dynamics of expansion→ Friedman‐Lemaître• R(t) : dynamics of expansion → Friedman‐Lemaître equations – model dependent
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 22
Curvature k in FLRW model • k = +1, 0, ‐1 depends on space geometry
• Curvature is independent of timeCurvature is independent of time
• Curvature is related to total mass‐energy density of universe 2kuniverse
( ) ( ) ( )2
2 2 1totalct
H t R tΩ − =
k
• It affects the evolution of density fluctuations in CMB radiation – path of photon is different
• Therefore it affects pattern of the CMB radiation today
• For universe as a whole, over large distances, space‐timeFor universe as a whole, over large distances, space time seems to be flat: k=0 from CMB observations
( ) ( )t tρ ρ=
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 23
( ) ( )tot critt tρ ρ=
k from CMB observations
Curvature of universe
CMB photons
movie
z = 1100model
CMB photonst=380.000 y
k 0k>0
k<0 z = 0
observe
k=0
observe
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 24
C i d tiGlobal energy tCosmic destinyGlobal energydensity
geometry
k<0 expandsfor everfor ever
k=0 velocityasymptotically zero
k>0 big crunch
2013‐14 25Expanding Universe lect1
Excercise• D. Perkins, chapter 5
• Oplossing meebrengen op het examenOplossing meebrengen op het examen
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 26
Hubble time – Hubble distance• Expansion parameter H(t) has dimension of (time)‐1
• Hubble time = expansion time today for constant expansionHubble time expansion time today for constant expansion
90
1 13.6 10t yearH
= = ×
• Hubble distance = Horizon distance today in flat static
0H
universe ( )0 0 4.2HD t c t Gpc= =
• But! Look back time and distance in expanding universedepend on dynamics in H(t) (see part 2) depe d o dy a cs (t) (see pa t )
( ) ( )( )( )
22
28
3NG c
R ttπ
= −H t ktotρ
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 27
( )( )R t
Example: matter dominated flat universe• Integration of Friedman equation with k=0 and only non‐relativistic matter
( )13 2
392
GMR t t⎛ ⎞= ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠
( )2⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠
( )0 031 R t t 92 1 9 1 10t yr= = ×( )( )
0
0 0 2H R t= = 0
0
9.1 103
t yrH
= = ×
• Dating of earth crust and old stars shows that age of universe is of order 14 x 109 yru e se s o o de 0 y
• → Need other energy components (see part 2)
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 28
Part 2Part 2ΛCDM ingredientsg
Dynamics of the expansion – Friedman Lemaître y pequations
Energy density of universeEnergy density of universe
Dynamics of the expansion• Einstein field equations of general relativity
1 8R G Tℜ Λ82 NR g G T g
g
μν μν μν μνπ− ℜ = −Λ
Λ⎛ ⎞ Cosmological8
8NN
gG T
Gμν
μνππΛ⎛ ⎞
= −⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠
Cosmologicalconstant
Geometry of space‐timeRobertson‐Walker metric
Energy‐momentumFunction of energy content of universegyIs model dependent11 3 -1 -26.67 10 m kg sNG −= ×
• Friedmann & Lemaître (1922) : Solutions for uniform and homogeneous universe behaving as perfect frictionlessfluidfluid
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 30
Friedmann-Lemaître equation• Time dependent evolution of universe = Friedman‐Lemaître equation
( ) ( ) ( )2
22 8 NR t G cπ⎛ ⎞
⎜ ⎟k( ) ( )
( ) ( )( )( )
22
83
NR t G cR t R t
tπ⎛ ⎞= −⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠H t k
totρ≡
curvature term=2
2kcR
( ) energy density of universe globally, 'at large'=ttoρ t
( ) expansion rate = Hubble 'constant' at time t=H t( )( ) ( )( )expansion rate = Hubble constant at time t
km= 73.8 2.4 /Mpc = Hubble constant todays
=
= ±0 0HH
H t
t
• energy density ρ is model dependent - ΛCDM model :
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
( )s
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 31
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )baryon coldDM rad DarkEntot t t t tρ ρ ρ ρ ρ= + + +
Second Friedman equation• Consider universe = perfect fluid with energy density ρc2
• Conservation of energy in volume element dV ; P = pressure of fluid
dE PdV= − ( )223 RP c
Rcρ ρ
⎛ ⎞= − + ⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠( ) ( )2 3 3d c R Pd Rρ ⋅ = −
• Differentiate 1st Friedman equation & substitute
Rc⎝ ⎠
43
NG RdRRdt
π⎛ ⎞⎛ ⎞= = − ⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠⎝ ⎠ 2
3Pρ +c
Equation of state
• ΛCDM model : Energy density consists of 3 components: matter, radiation (incl. relativistic particles), constant vacuum energy
3dt ⎝ ⎠⎝ ⎠ c
with 8matter vacuum vacradiation G
ρ ρ ρ ρ ρ ρπ ΛΛ
= + + = =
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 32
8 NGπ
Equations of state 11. Matter component: ‘dust’ of non‐relativistic particles
(v<<c) – matter pressure from kinetic energy2
22
2 23 3
knon rel
E vP c v cV c
ρ−
⎛ ⎞⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞= = × <<⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠
0non relP − ≈
2. Radiation component: radiation & relativistic particles –di ti f id l
3 3V c⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠
radiation pressure of ideal gas21
3 3relE cPV
ρ= =
3. Vacuum energy – negative pressure equivalent to
3 3rel V
3 acuu e e gy egat e p essu e equ a e t togravitational repulsion
2vacP c cstρ= − =
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 33
Equation of state 2• Relation between pressure and energy ‐ introduce w
P w=2 wcρ
=
( ) R⎛ ⎞ R⎛ ⎞( )223 RP c
Rcρ ρ
⎛ ⎞= − + ⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠( )2
23 1 Rc wRc
ρ ρ⎛ ⎞
= − + ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠
( ) ( ) ( )3 1 3 11w wconst R zρ
− + += ∝ +
• For small t assume that ~R tβ ( ) ( )2
3 1 wR t t
+∼
1di ti1
2R13
0
radiation w
matter w
=
=
2
23
R t
R t
∼
∼
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 34
1&vacuum w constρ= − = HtR e∼
( ) ( )3 11 w++( ) ( )1 zρ ∝ +
1 0 22013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 35
© J. Frieman1 0.2DarkEnergyw = − ±
Critical density• flat universe (k=0) = equilibrium between open and close universe
• Friedmann equation becomes
( ) ( )( )
2 22
2
8 33 8
N
N
cR t G HH tR t G
πρπ
⎛ ⎞≡ = ⇒ =⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠
cρ
• density ρc is called critical density
( ) 3 8 NR t Gπ⎝ ⎠
ρc
• Value today is( )
227 30
03 9.6 10
8cHt kg mG
ρπ
− −= = ×
2 3 3
8
5.4 5 protons at rest per mN
c
G
c GeV m
π
ρ = ≈
• Observations →universe is geometrically flat, so present averagedensity of universe, away from galaxies, is a few protons per m3
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 36
closure parameter• Define closure parameter W
( ) ( )( )c
tt
ρρ
=Ω t
• For general geometry with k≠0, Friedmann equation becomes
( )cρ
2 2 22
2
83
N
c c
G H H kcHR
π ρρ ρ
⎛ ⎞= ⇒ = −⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠
( )( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
2
2 21t kcρ
= − ⇒2
2 2kc1 = Ω t -
H t R t
3 c c Rρ ρ⎝ ⎠
• Define curvature term
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )2 2c t H Rρ 2 2H t R t
Observations: 2
2 2K
c
kcH R
ρρ
= = −kΩ ( ) ( ) 1kt tΩ +Ω =flat universeand Ω=1 at
ll ti
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 37
cρ all times
Observed energy densities 1• Energy density is composed of: dust/matter (non‐rel), radiation (incl. rel particles), vacuum energy (L)
• Relative contributions unfluence dynamics of expansion( ) 1k kΩ+Ω = +Ω =m r ΛΩ + Ω + Ω
• Relative contributions unfluence dynamics of expansion
Present‐day observations:
1. Radiation (from CMB energy density)
( )( )0 55 10radtρ
−Ω
2 Luminous baryonic matter : p n nuclei in stars gas dust
( )( )( )
50
0
5 10radrad
ct
tρ−Ω = ≈ ×
2. Luminous baryonic matter : p,n,nuclei in stars, gas, dust
0.01lumlum
ρρ
Ω = <
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 38
cρ
Observed energy densities 23. total baryon density – from fit of the model of primordial
nucleosynthesis to measurements of light elementabundances (chapter 6)
30.26 baryons bn m−≈
4 T t l tt d it f fit t CMB d t i l
28 3
y
4.0 10 0.04b
b bkg mρ − −≈ × ⇒ Ω ≈
4. Total matter density – from fit to CMB data ‐ is clumpy
in ΛCDM model this is composed of baryons and (mostlycold) dark matter
0.31m DMbΩ = Ω +Ω =
5. Neutrino density – relics of early universe – from fit to CMB data 0 01Ω ≤
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 39
0.01νΩ ≤
Observed energy densities 35. total density: fit of ΛCDM cosmological model to large set
of observation data (CMB, SN, …) – PDG 2013
6 By subtraction we obtain the vacuum energy density
1 1.0005 0.0033ktotalΩ = −Ω = ± 0k ≈6. By subtraction we obtain the vacuum energy density
non clumpy – homogeneous effect – PDG 2013
Conclusions:0.692 0.010ΛΩ = ±
– 95% of energy content of universe is of unknown type
– Today most of it is dark vacuum energy0 31Ω
y gy
– See further in chapter 7 0.310.69
m
Λ
Ω ≈Ω ≈
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 40
Λ
Evolution of energy components 1• Cosmological redshift is related to the expansion rate
( ) ( )01 0R t
( ) ( )3 1 w+
1 R di ti h t d l ti i ti ti l
( )( ) ( )0
01 0z z tR t
+ = = ( ) ( )3 11 wzρ +∝ +
1. Radiation = photons and relativistic particles
( )2 23 3 4
1 1 1E hc cνρ ρλ
= ⇒∼ ∼ ∼( )( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
3 3 4
2 44 40 21 1
radV R R Rc t R t
z c z
ρ ρλ
ρρ= = + ⇒ +∼
2 Non relati isti matter l mp matter
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )2 40
1 1rad
z c zc t R t
ρρ
= = + ⇒ +∼
2. Non‐relativistic matter – clumpy matter
( ) ( )32 23 3 3
1 1 1E mc c zρ ρ= ⇒ +∼ ∼ ∼ ∼
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 41
( ) ( )3 3 3 1m
c c zV R R R
ρ ρ⇒ +
Evolution of energy components 23. Vacuum energy is constant in our model
4. Curvature term( )2c cstρ
Λ=
4. Curvature term
( ) ( )2
22 2 1 1kcc c zρ ρ−= ⇒ +∼ ∼( ) ( )2 2 2 1
kc c z
H R Rρ ρ= ⇒ +
• Dynamics of expansion can be rewritten
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )2 8 Gπ⎡ ⎤( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
2
20
83 m r k
k
GH t t t t t
H t t t t
π ρ ρ ρ ρΛ
Λ
⎡ ⎤= + + +⎣ ⎦
⎡ ⎤= Ω +Ω +Ω +Ω⎣ ⎦( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
( )( ) ( )( ) ( ) ( )( )0 0
0
30
4 220 01 1 1
m r k
m r kt
H t t t t
H z t z zt t
Λ
Λ
⎡ ⎤Ω +Ω +Ω +Ω⎣ ⎦⎡ ⎤= + + + + Ω+ +Ω Ω⎣Ω ⎦
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 42
⎣ ⎦
Summary
( )42 1radiation c zρ +∼ ( )( )32
2
1matter c z
t
ρ +∼
( )
2
22 1
vacuum c cst
curvature c z
ρ
ρ +
∼
∼
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 43
Lookback time
dz( )( )0
11 1 zdR dRHR dt R t
tH H
d dRR+
= ⇒ = =
( )1dzdtz H
= −⎡ ⎤+⎣ ⎦
( )0R dt R tH HR
( ) ( ) ( )00 2
1dR t
R t R tR zd−= ⇒ =( ) ( )
( )0 21 1z z+ +
• Time elapsed between emission of a photon at expansion time tE by object at redshift zE and todayE E
( ) ( )
0
0
0t
Edzt t dt− = = −
⎡ ⎤∫ ∫ ( ) ( )0 1EE
Et z
t t dtz H z⎡ ⎤+⎣ ⎦
∫ ∫
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 44
age of the universe• Age of universe from integrationFrom Big Bang time ( t=0 and z=∞) to present time ( t=t0) 0and z=0)
00
0t
dzt dt− = = −∫ ∫• Example: flat universe (Wk=0) withWm=0.24, WΛ=0.76
( ) ( )00
01
t dtz H t∞
= =⎡ ⎤+⎣ ⎦
∫ ∫Example: flat universe (Wk 0) withWm 0.24, WΛ 0.76 (WMAP results)
( )0 13.95 0.4t Gyr= ±
• Uitwerking meebrengen op examen• Uitwerking meebrengen op examen
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 45
Age of the universe
( ) 1m r kΛΩ +Ω +Ω +Ω =
0=rΩ00.24
=
=k
m
ΩΩ
H t 1 0.76Λ = − =mΩ Ω0 0H t
( )0 0
0
1.02613.95 0.4
H tt Gyr
=
= ±( )0 y
Only matter
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 46
Only matter
mΩ
Particle horizon 1 • Maximum distance accessible via light signals to an observer at given time t0 ?0
• In static flat universe
• In an expanding FLRW universe for a photon following a
( )0 0 4.2static flatHD t ct Gpc− = =
• In an expanding FLRW universe, for a photon following a line with fixed θ and φ
( )2
2 2 2 ⎡ ⎤dr2 0ds = ( )2 2 2
21c R t
kr⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥−⎣ ⎦
drdt =
• Proper distance travelled by photon emitted at time tE and comoving position rE ( ) ( )0 0ED t r R t= ⋅E
• Observed at time t0 and position r=0
( ) ( )0 0ED t r R t
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 47
Particle horizon 2• Particle horizon for observer at time t0 : tE→0
td dt⎡ ⎤( ) ( ) ( ) ( )0 0 020 0
0
1H
Er t cD dr dt R t R tR tkr
t⎡ ⎤= =⎢ ⎥
−⎣ ⎦∫ ∫i
• Expanding, flat, radiation dominated universe1
( )( )0 0
12R t t
R t t⎛ ⎞
= ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠
( )0 02HD t ct=
• Expanding, flat, matter dominated universe( )0 0R t t⎝ ⎠
( )( )0 0
23R t t
R t t⎛ ⎞
= ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠
( )0 03HD t ct=
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 48
( )0 0R t t⎝ ⎠
Particle horizon 3• For a more complex cosmological model
( )( ) ( )0 2
00 1
r cI zdr cdzR tH Hkr
= − =−
∫ ∫
( )( )( ) ( )( ) ( ) ( )( )3 4 20
121 1 1
z dzI zt t t t
=⎡ ⎤Ω + +Ω + +Ω +Ω +∫
• ForWk=0,Wm=0.24,WΛ=0.76 and integration to z=∞
( )( ) ( )( ) ( ) ( )( )00 0 0 01 1 1m r Kt z t z t t zΛ
⎡ ⎤Ω + +Ω + +Ω +Ω +⎣ ⎦
For Wk 0, Wm 0.24, WΛ 0.76 and integration to z
03.3 3.3 14BBexpansionH
cD ct GpcH
=∼ ∼0H
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 49
Deceleration parameter 1• Taylor expansion of expansion parameter around t0(present time)
( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( )( )20 0 0 0 0
12
R t R t R t t t R t t t⎛ ⎞= + − + − +⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠
( )( ) ( )( ) ( ) ( )
( )( )( )22
0 0 0 0
2
11R t
H t t t H t t t
⎝ ⎠⎡ ⎤⎛ ⎞= + − − +⎢ ⎥⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠−− 0 0
2
R t R t( ) ( )( )
( )( )( )
( ) ( ) ( )
0 0 0 00
22
2
11
R t
R tH t t H t t
⎢ ⎥⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠ ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦
⎛ ⎞+ +⎜ ⎟
20R t
q( )( ) ( ) ( )2
0 0 0 00
12
H t t H t tR t
= + − − +⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠
− 0q
• Deceleration parameter q(t): acceleration or decelerationof expansion at time tof expansion at time t
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 50
Deceleration parameter 2• Deceleration parameter q(t) is related to energy density attime t – for flat universe (k=0)
( )2
2
RR R Rq tR R R
⎛ ⎞⎛ ⎞= − = −⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠⎝ ⎠ ( ) 0 0q t R deceleration> ⇒ < ⇒
( ) ( )22 2
4 133
R R R
Gq t c Pc Hπ ρ
⎝ ⎠⎝ ⎠⎡ ⎤ ⎛ ⎞= − − + ⎜ ⎟⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦ ⎝ ⎠
( ) 0 0q t R acceleration< ⇒ > ⇒
• Energy‐pressure relation: equations of state for
( )3c H⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦ ⎝ ⎠
– Dust/matter
– Radiation/relativistic particlesp
– Vacuum energy( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
2m
rt
q t t tΛΩ
= +Ω −Ω
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 51
2
Acceleration or deceleration?
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )2
mr
tq t t tΛ
Ω= +Ω −Ω
• A universe dominated by matter decelerates due to gravitational collapse :gravitational collapse :
( ) ( ) 0 0mq t t RΩ > ⇒ <∼
• A universe dominated by vacuum energy accelerates
( ) ( ) 0 0q t t RΛ≈ −Ω < ⇒ >
• Observations show that today( ) ( )
( ) ( )0 00 0r m q t R tΛ
Ω Ω ⎫⇒ < ⇒ >⎬Ω > Ω ⎭
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 52
mΛΩ > Ω ⎭
Part 3Observation dataObservation dataRedshift measurementsRedshift measurementsLuminosity distance
S N ISuperNovae IaCosmic Microwave Background
Large galaxy surveysLight element abundances
Measuring redshift• Atoms emit light at certain wavelengths – is measuredin laboratory (atom at rest)
• Atoms in quasars emitRestframe wavelength (Å)
2000 4000 6000
Atoms in quasars emitsame spectrum but light isredshifted when reaching
Restframe wavelength (Å)
CIV redshifted when reachingEarth
• Comparison of observed• Comparison of observedspectrum with labspectrum gives redshift zspectrum gives redshift z
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 54
examples
( )( )
01 obs tz
tλλ
+ =( )em tλ
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 55
Magnitude and distance• Luminosity distance DL to star with intrinsic luminosity L
• F = power measured at Earth LF =
• Absolute magnitude M = magnitude at 10pc distance
24 LF
Dπ
• Effective magnitude m of star with absolute magnitude M
2.5logM L cst= − +
( ) 10
g
5log 251Mpc
z M⎛ ⎞
− = +⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠
LDm
• Large negative magnitude = bright star: e.g. m(Sun)=‐26 ; m(Sirius,
1Mpc⎝ ⎠
g g g g g ( ) ; ( ,brightest star) = ‐1.7
• Far away object is dimmer and has larger (=smaller negative) m
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 56
SN Ia as standard candlesS I b i ht li ht f di t t SN b• Supernovae Ia are very bright – light from very distant SN can beobserved – up to z=1.7
• Are hydrogen poor• Are hydrogen poor
• All have roughly the same luminosity curve
M101 at 20 MlySN2011feSN2011fe Flashed on 18 december 2011
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 57
SN Ia as standard candles1995 (H Phili ) l ti b t k l i it d d li• 1995 (Hamuy, Philips): relation between peak luminosity and declinerate
• Measure Δm > obtain M e• Measure Δm15 ‐> obtain M
magnitude
solute
mAbs
Δm15
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 58
SN Ia – Nobel Prize 2011• S. Perlmutter ‐ Supernova Cosmology Project (SCP)
http://supernova.lbl.gov/
• A. Riess & B. Schmidt – High‐z Supernova Search Team (HZSNS) http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/supernova//HighZ.html
• High statistics SN monitoring– Distance: observed magnitude
18 December 1998
g
+ absolute magnitude from lightcurve
– Redshift from spectrak h hk h h f hf h
Redshift from spectra
• 1998: discover accelerated
osmi e pansion
BreakthroughBreakthrough of the of the yearyear
cosmic expansion
• Probe history at z < 2
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 59
Deceleration in past & acceleration nowThe principlePerlmutter, 2003
0% matter
00%100% matter
High density
Low densityAccelerated expansion
e D(z)
High densityDecelerated expansion
istanc
d
Redshift z pastnow
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 60( ) ( )01 0.5R z R t= = ×
Recent survey of SuperNovae
arXiv:1105.3470v1
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 61
Abundances of light elements• Model of Big Bang Nucleosynthesis predicts abundances of light nuclei: H, D, He, Li , ..
• They were formed at t ~20min when kT ~ KeV and z>>1100
• Abundances are measured today• Abundances are measured today
• probe expansion model at redshift z >> 1100, beforeti f CMBcreation of CMB
• Allow to measure baryon density 0.044 0.005BΩ = ±
• See lecture 2See ectu e
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 62
Big Bang Nucleosynthesis( )• when kT ~ 3 MeV , left with ( )
,,
, ,,,
,, ,e
ne
p nep
ν ν μ
γ
τ−+
• Neutrinos decouple, anti‐particles are annihilated
F t f b ? Bi B N l th i d l
,, , , ppγ
• Fate of baryons? → Big Bang Nucleosynthesis model
• Protons and neutrons in equilibrium due to weakinteractions
• Neutrons are ‘saved’ by binding to protons → deuteronse nepν ++ ↔ + eepn ν−→ + +
• At kT ~ 80 KeV (20 mins)
2.22n p D MeVγ+ ↔ + +
2.22n p D MeVγ+ → + +• At kT 80 KeV (20 mins)
• Formation of light nuclei
2.22n p D MeVγ+ → + +
2 3 43, , ,, ..H He HeH• Fractions of elements predicted by BBN model2012‐13 Expanding Universe 63
Cosmic Microwave Backgroundf f i f li h l i (BBN d l) d 20 i• after formation of light nuclei (BBN model) around t=20 mins
• Plasma of H+, He++ , … nuclei, plus e‐ and photons – in thermal equilibriumequilibrium
• At recombination (380’000 y) , when E < eV (ionisation potentials) nuclei + e‐→ atoms + CMB photonsnuclei + e → atoms + CMB photons
( )1 1100 d 380 000 d T 3000K
CMBe p H γ− + → +
• Matter radiation decoupling
( ) dec1 1100 and 380.000 and T 3000decdecz t y K+ ≈ ≈ ≈
• Matter‐radiation decoupling
• Expect to see γ’s today as uniform Cosmic Microwave Background
Ob d 3K b k d h t di ti ith bl k b d t• Observed 3K background photon radiation with black body spectrum
• Probe history at z = 1100
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 64
Cosmic Microwave Background
Matter
photonsare released
© U i O
are released
© Univ Oregon
Baryons/nuclei and Photons decouple/freeze‐outBaryons/nuclei and photons in thermal equilibrium
Photons decouple/freeze outDuring expansion they cool
downExpect to see today a uniform
γ radiation which behaves like a bl k b d di ti
2012‐13 Expanding Universe 65
black body radiation
A i t i iStructure Anisotropies in atom distributionare ‘frozen’ in CMB
Structure formation in
early universe? are frozen in CMBy
hCMB photonsare released
© Univ Oregon
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 66
What can we learn from CMB?• Density (pressure) anisotropies in photon‐baryon fluid at time of
decoupling should leave imprint in distribution of g’s today• observe temperature anisotropies O(10‐5)
• Growth of anisotropies depends on evolution of matter, radiation and dark energy during expansion
• Angular distance between 2 photon
directions depends on curvature
of space
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 67
Large Scale Structures• Redshift measurements of large samples of galaxies
• For ex.: Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS 2000‐2014): millionFor ex.: Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS 2000 2014): million of galaxies being recorded
• On average uniform population• On average uniform population
• Galaxies = baryonic matter
• Density (pressure) anisotropies in photon‐baryon fluid attime of decoupling are expected to leave imprint in distribution of galaxies today
• ‐> Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) observations
• probe universe at z <~ 5 – or evolution during last 7Gyearsy
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 68
2dF quasar redshift survey 2003
SDSS survey of local skyLow z – recent universe
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 69
Baryon Acoustic Oscillations
Fit ΛCDM model to observationspdg.lbl.gov
ΛΩSN Ia distance‐redshift surveys
ΛΩ
CMB anisitropiespsurvey by WMAP
Anisotropies in l
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 70mΩ
galaxy surveys
Fit ΛCDM model to observationsPdg.lbl.govg g
2013‐14 Expanding Universe lect1 71