The Cooling Airflow of Heavy Trucks - a Parametric Study
Thomas Hällqvist, Scania CV AB
Company Logo
2008-01-1171
2
Introduction Study of the influence on the cooling airflow
from various installation parameters on a Heavy duty truck.
Analysis performed by means of 3D CFD. The focus of the paper is on the system
pressure loss, flow distribution and cooling capacity.
2008-01-1171
3
Physical Model
2008-01-1171
Complete 2-axle tractor. Air enters in the front via mesh
screens. Cooling package includes:
Condensor Oil cooler EGR cooler CAC cooler Radiator
Pictures show the surface mesh
4
Physical Model
2008-01-1171
Fan diameter of 750 mm (default). Fan placement depends on engine
type. Both V8 and inline six engines are
considered. High level of details in the engine
compartment.
Pictures show the surface mesh
5
Simulation Technique 3D isothermal CFD simulation. LBM solver by EXA corp. Coupling to 2D heat exchanger calculation. Fan modeled via MRF. Heat exchangers and mesh screens modeled as
porous media.
2008-01-1171
6
Model Size and Accuracy Statistical convergence within <1 %. Absolute accuracy within 6 % for massflow (rel. MP). 40-50·106 volume elements. Simulated on 128 cpu’s Linux cluster. Total runtime of approx. 22-30 h.
2008-01-1171
data sampling interval
MP: Micro Probe measurements
7
General Boundary Conditions
2008-01-1171
Virtual windtunnel with moving ground. Windspeed of 30 km/h. Ambient temperature of 25°C. Fan speed of 1700 rpm.
inletoutlet
L = 170 mW = 60 mH = 45 m
8
Parameter Variations
2008-01-1171
Front opening area. Fan-to-radiator spacing. Fan-to-engine spacing. Width of cooling module. Fan diameter. Fan projection into shroud.
9
Results
Study of the impact from various parameter settings on: the flow character, the total pressure loss, the flow distribution through the radiator, the cooling capacity.
2008-01-1171
10
Results: general flow character
2008-01-1171
The underhood includes different subsystems. Subsystems installed in serial or in parallel. The fan shroud has large influence on the pressure loss. All subsystems, but the HX’s, must be optimized w.r.t dP. A HX with large dP generally comes with large heat transfer
capacity.
Fan shroudCooling pacakge
RAD
11
Results: general flow character
2008-01-1171
Airflow enters via the front. Static pressure decreases
until the fan, where the pressure is build up to Pamb + dPrear underhood.
Three main flow directions below the cab.
Flow also underneath the engine.
12
Results: general flow character
2008-01-1171
V8: fan in high position S6: fan in low position Fan placement and engine type
influences the flow distribution.
V8: Fan on top of crossmember. S6: Fan in front of crossmember. Strong influence on dP below the
engine.
V8 setup Inline-six setup (S6) V8 setup Inline-six setup
13
0.98
1
1.02
1.04
1.06
0 20 40 60 80 100dx (mm)
ma
ssf
low
/ m
as
sflo
w (
Ca
se-R
EF
)
V8 cases
S6 cases
Results: fan-to-radiator spacing
2008-01-1171
V8 setup
Inline-six setup
Fan shrouds with different depths tested. Default setup V8 has a deeper shroud. dx more critical for S6-cases. At same depth the V8 setup features higher
dPtot than S6.
Case REF*
14
Results: fan-to-radiator spacing
2008-01-1171
N
i
i
U
u
Nuniformity
1
12
11
0.86
0.87
0.88
0.89
0.9
0.91
0.92
0.93
0.94
Case REF* Case FS Case dx60+
un
ifo
rmit
y
dx also influences the flow distribution. So also the shape of the shroud. Bad uniformity for RAD higher dPRAD.
V8 setup
15
Results: fan diameter / width of RAD
2008-01-1171
The geometrical shape of the fan shroud influences the flow distribution. A wide cooler gives low flow rates in the outer regions. A larger fan improves the uniformity. A larger fan can geometrically be compared to a deeper fan shroud.
V8 default case setup 20 % wider cooling package 20 % larger fan
uniformity = 0.87 (Case NF) uniformity = 0.88 uniformity = 0.91
16
Results: fan projection into shroud
2008-01-1171
FPiS determines the flow direction behind the fan. FPiS should be tuned for each specific installation. Large FPiS axial fan behavior, high dP for large engine silhouette. Small FPiS radial fan behavior, high rates of leak flows. The smaller fan-tip to fan-ring spacing the smaller FPiS is possible.
axial fan behavior
leak flows
17
1
1.01
1.02
1.03
1.04
1.05
0.86 0.88 0.9 0.92 0.94 0.96 0.98 1uniformity
CC
/CC
*
0.95
1
1.05
1.1
1.15
1.2
1.25
1 1.05 1.1 1.15 1.2 1.25
normalized massflow
no
rma
lize
d c
oo
ling
pe
rfo
rma
nc
e
Results: cooling performance (1/CC)
2008-01-1171
Influence from flow uniformity Influence from massflow
The flow uniformity has some effect on the cooling performance.
The character of the flow distribution is also relevant.
Within the present interval the cooling performance has a linear relation to the massflow.
The non-uniform and the uniform flow show the same trends.
non-uniform flow
uniform flow
),()(
HXuniformitykUhA
QCC
18
Conclusions The underhood involves several subsystems. The design of the fan shroud is crucial. The flow distribution is important w.r.t. to dP. For the cooling performance the massflow is
of main importance, uniformity of less.
19
Future Work Additional parameter settings. Extend the study w.r.t. fan configuration. Study the effect from fan modeling. Extend the thermodynamic analysis.