Download - The Absurdity of Philosophy
The Absurdity of Philosophy
The Absurdity Of
Philosophy
Jeff Smith-Luedke
Lulu, Inc. Morrisville, NC
Preface
The Absurdity of Philosophy
The Absurdity of Philosophy 1
1
2 The Absurdity of Philosophy
The Absurdity of Philosophy 3
4 The Absurdity of Philosophy
1
1 Nietzsche, Friedrich. Twilight of the Idols and The Antichrist. London, UK: Penguin
Books. 2003. Page 45.
The Absurdity of Philosophy 5
2
2
2 This opening paragraph is an allusion to the opening paragraph of “The Myth of
Sisyphus.” Camus, Albert. The Myth of Sisyphus. New York, NY: Vintage International. 1991. Page 119.
6 The Absurdity of Philosophy
The Absurdity of Philosophy 7
3
3
3 Plato. The Republic. PLATO: The Collected Dialogues Including the Letters.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 2002. Pages 747-752.
8 The Absurdity of Philosophy
4
5
The Absurdity of Philosophy 9
4
4 Nietzsche, Friedrich. Twilight of the Idols and The Antichrist. London, UK: Penguin
Books. 2003. Pages 52-65.
10 The Absurdity of Philosophy
5
6
5 Nietzsche, Friedrich. The Gay Science. New York, NY: Vintage Books. 1974.
§125.
The Absurdity of Philosophy 11
7 6
6 Nietzsche, Friedrich. The Will to Power. New York, NY: Barnes & Noble
Publishing, Inc. 2006. §585.
12 The Absurdity of Philosophy
7
7 Camus, Albert. The Myth of Sisyphus. New York, NY: Vintage International. 1991.
Page 3.
The Absurdity of Philosophy 13
14 The Absurdity of Philosophy
The Absurdity of Philosophy 15
8
16 The Absurdity of Philosophy
8
9
8 "To be delivered from the sickness of death is an impossibility, for the sickness and
its torment - and death - consist in not being able to die." Kierkegaard, Søren, Bretall, Robert, ed. "Sickness Unto Death." A Kierkegaard Anthology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 1973. Page 344.
9 "[Abraham] did it for God's sake because God required this proof of his faith." Ibid. “Fear and Trembling.” Page 133.
The Absurdity of Philosophy 17
10
9
10 “Instead of the objective uncertainty, there is a certainty, namely, that objectively it
is absurd and that is absurdity, held fast in the passion of inwardness, is faith. The Socratic ignorance is like a witty jest in comparison with the earnestness of facing the absurd; and the Socratic existential inwardness is like the Greek light-mindedness in comparison with the grave strenuosity of faith." Ibid. “Postscript.” Page 220.
18 The Absurdity of Philosophy
11
11 “Conversely, the compulsion to prolong life from day to day, anxiously consulting
doctors and accepting the most painful, humiliating conditions, without the strength to come nearer the actual goal of one’s life: this is far less worthy of respect. Religions provide abundant excuses to escape the need to kill oneself: this is how they insinuate themselves with those who are in love with life.” Nietzsche, Friedrich. Human, All Too Human. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press. 1996. §80.
The Absurdity of Philosophy 19
20 The Absurdity of Philosophy
12
10
12 Camus, Albert. The Myth of Sisyphus. New York, NY: Vintage International.
1991. Page 123.
The Absurdity of Philosophy 21
11
22 The Absurdity of Philosophy
The Absurdity of Philosophy 23
24 The Absurdity of Philosophy
12
The Absurdity of Philosophy 25
13
13 Descartes, René. Discourse on Method; New York, NY: Barnes & Noble
Publishing, Inc. 2004. Page 84.
26 The Absurdity of Philosophy
The Absurdity of Philosophy 27
14
15
14 “We make to ourselves pictures of facts. The picture presents the facts in logical
space, the existence and non-existence of atomic facts. The picture is a model of reality. To the objects correspond in the picture the elements of the picture. The elements of the picture stand, in the picture, for the objects.” Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. New York, NY: Barnes & Noble Publishing, Inc. 1927. Page 15, §§ 2.1 – 2.131.
15 Russell, Bertrand. "Is There a God?" 1952. Evan's Experientialism. <http://evans-experientialism.freewebspace.com/russell10.htm>.
28 The Absurdity of Philosophy
16
16 Gödel, Kurt. "On Formally Undecidable Propositions in Principia Mathematica and
Related Systems." IBM Research. 1931. <http://www.research.ibm.com/people/h/hirzel/papers/canon00-goedel.pdf>.
The Absurdity of Philosophy 29
13
17
17 Popper, Karl. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London, UK: Routledge. 2000.
30 The Absurdity of Philosophy
The Absurdity of Philosophy 31
14
18
18 Morningstar, Chip. "How To Deconstruct Almost Anything: My Postmodern
Adventure." 1993. <http://www.fudco.com/chip/deconstr.html>.
32 The Absurdity of Philosophy
19
19 Derrida, Jacques. Of Grammatology. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins
University Press. 1997.
The Absurdity of Philosophy 33
15
34 The Absurdity of Philosophy
16
20
20 “There is no outside-text.” Ibid. Page 158.
The Absurdity of Philosophy 35
21
1722
21 Waylessness; being perpetually lost with no sense of direction. 22 Derrida, Jacques. Acts of Religion. New York, NY: Routledge. 2002.
36 The Absurdity of Philosophy
18
19
20
The Absurdity of Philosophy 37
38 The Absurdity of Philosophy
23
24
23 This sentence was first used by William J. Rapaport in Linguist List, 1972. Using
the place of Buffalo (e.g., NY), buffalo the animal, and buffalo the verb, this sentence reads something like, “The bison from New York that other bison from New York push around, themselves push around other New York bison.”
24 Goldberg, Dr. Bruce. University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Philosophy of Mind coursework lecture notes of S. Mazzoni. Fall term, 1993.
The Absurdity of Philosophy 39
21
22
40 The Absurdity of Philosophy
The Absurdity of Philosophy 41
23
42 The Absurdity of Philosophy
24
25
The Absurdity of Philosophy 43
25
25 Diamond, Cora, ed. Wittgenstein’s Lectures on the Foundations of Mathematics,
Cambridge 1939. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. 1976. Page 19.
44 The Absurdity of Philosophy
The Absurdity of Philosophy 45
26
46 The Absurdity of Philosophy
27
28
The Absurdity of Philosophy 47
29
26
26 Everett, Daniel. “Cultural Constraints on Grammar and Cognition in Pirahã,”
Current Anthropology, Volume 46, Number 4, August-October 2005. PNG Language Resources. Summer Institute of Linguistics. <http://www.pnglanguages.org/americas/brasil/PUBLCNS/ANTHRO/PHGrCult.pdf>.
48 The Absurdity of Philosophy
30
27
28
27 Pinker, Steven. The Stuff of Thought. New York, NY: Viking Penguin. 2007.
Page 4. 28 Heidegger, Martin. Being and Time. Albany, NY: State University of New York
Press. 1996. Page 67.
The Absurdity of Philosophy 49
31
32
50 The Absurdity of Philosophy
29
30
33
31
29 Suter, Ronald. Interpreting Wittgenstein: A Cloud of Philosophy, A Drop of
Grammar. Philadelphia, PA: Temple university Press. 1989. 30 Staten, Henry. Wittgenstein and Derrida. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska
Press. 1984. This is the argument that Henry Staten put forward and Derrida called “a big step forward in the field.”
31 Derrida, Jacques. Of Grammatology. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press. 1997.
The Absurdity of Philosophy 51
52 The Absurdity of Philosophy
The Absurdity of Philosophy 53
54 The Absurdity of Philosophy
32
32 These three propositions summarize the thesis of Gorgias’s On Nature or the Non-
Existent, discussed by Sextus Empiricus in Against the Professors, and in various other works of antiquity on rhetoric. The book itself has unfortunately been lost to posterity.
The Absurdity of Philosophy 55
33
34
33 Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations. Malden, MA: Blackwell
Publishing. 2001. §454.
56 The Absurdity of Philosophy
35 34
34 “Think of the tools in a tool-box: there is a hammer, pliers, a saw, a screw-driver, a
rule, a glue-pot, glue, nails and screws. –The functions of words are as diverse as the functions of these objects. (And in both cases there are similarities.)” Ibid. §11.
The Absurdity of Philosophy 57
35
35 “In the practice of the use of language one party calls out the words, the other acts
on them. In instruction in the language the following process will occur: the learner names the objects; that is, he utters the word when the teacher points to the stone. - And there will be this still simpler exercise: the pupil repeats the words after the teacher - both of these being processes resembling language… I will call these games ‘language-games’ and will sometimes speak of a primitive language as a language-game.” Ibid. §7.
58 The Absurdity of Philosophy
The Absurdity of Philosophy 59
60 The Absurdity of Philosophy
The Absurdity of Philosophy 61
62 The Absurdity of Philosophy
The Absurdity of Philosophy 63
64 The Absurdity of Philosophy
The Absurdity of Philosophy 65
36
66 The Absurdity of Philosophy
36
37
36 “If you say he sees a private picture before him, which he is describing, you have
still made an assumption about what he has before him… If you admit that you haven’t any notion what kind of thing it might be that he has before him – then what leads you into saying, in spite of that, that he has something before him? Isn’t it as if I were to say of someone: ‘He has something. But I don’t know whether it is money, or debts, or an empty till.’” Ibid. §294.
The Absurdity of Philosophy 67
38
68 The Absurdity of Philosophy
39
37
37 Wittgenstein, Ludwig. The Blue and Brown Books. New York, NY: Harper
Torchbooks. 1965. Page 4.
The Absurdity of Philosophy 69
38
38 "For a large class of cases - though not for all - in which we employ the word
‘meaning’ it can be defined thus: the meaning of a word is its use in the language" Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. 2001. §43.
70 The Absurdity of Philosophy
The Absurdity of Philosophy 71
40
72 The Absurdity of Philosophy
41
42
The Absurdity of Philosophy 73
74 The Absurdity of Philosophy
The Absurdity of Philosophy 75
39
39 Witmer, D. Gene. “Atheism, Reason, and Morality: Responding to Some Popular
Christian Apologetics.” 2006. Gator Freethought. <http://grove.ufl.edu/~aasa/witmer%20talk%201.pdf>.
76 The Absurdity of Philosophy
40
40 “It is not enough for a man to speak or write; he must also be listened to or read. It
is no mean thing to have a person’s attention, to have a wide audience, to be allowed to speak under certain circumstances, in certain gatherings, in certain circles. We must not forget that by listening to someone we display a willingness to eventually accept his point of view… Frivolous discussions that are lacking in apparent interest are not always entirely unimportant, inasmuch as they contribute to the smooth working of an indispensable social mechanism.” Perelman, Chaim, and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press. 1969. Page 17.
The Absurdity of Philosophy 77
43
78 The Absurdity of Philosophy
The Absurdity of Philosophy 79
44
45
41
41 Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations. Malden, MA: Blackwell
Publishing. 2001. §38.
80 The Absurdity of Philosophy
42
42 Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations. Malden, MA: Blackwell
Publishing. 2001. §38.
The Absurdity of Philosophy 81
46
82 The Absurdity of Philosophy
The Absurdity of Philosophy 83
43
43 “Uncritical semantics is the myth of a museum in which the exhibits are meanings
and the words are labels. To switch languages is to switch labels.” Quine, Willard Van Orman. Ontological Relativity & Other Essays. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. 1969. Page 27.
See also: “Two Dogmas of Empiricism,” From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 1980.
84 The Absurdity of Philosophy
47
44
44 Popper, Karl. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London, UK: Routledge. 2000.
The Absurdity of Philosophy 85
45
45 Ronald Suter called this ‘criteriology’ in his Understanding Wittgenstein: A Cloud of
Philosophy, A Drop of Grammar (1989), and makes the argument, among others, that this is a more proper understanding of Wittgenstein’s philosophy of psychology and distinguishes Wittgenstein’s approach from the behaviorist approach.
86 The Absurdity of Philosophy
46
46 “We had been picturing the rejection of the law of excluded middle, ‘p or ~p’, mainly
as a rejection of classical negation. I have now directed the intuitionist’s case rather at the alteration. Actually the distinction is unreal; once you upset the interrelations of the logical operators, you may be said to have revised any or all. Anyway, the intuitionist’s negation is deviant also on its own account: the law of double negation lapses… The intuitionist should not be viewed as controverting us as to the true laws of certain fixed logical operations, namely, negation and alternation. He should be viewed rather as opposing our negation and alternation as unscientific ideas, and propounding certain other ideas, somewhat analogous, of his own.” Quine, Willard Van Orman. Philosophy of Logic. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 1986. Page 87.
The Absurdity of Philosophy 87
48
88 The Absurdity of Philosophy
49
The Absurdity of Philosophy 89
50
90 The Absurdity of Philosophy
The Absurdity of Philosophy 91
51
47
52
47 Carroll, Lewis, with an introduction and notes by Martin Gardner. The Annotated
Alice. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company. 2000. Page 213.
92 The Absurdity of Philosophy
48
48 McWhorter, John. Your Own Thing: The Degradation of Language and Why We
Should, Like, Care. New York, NY: Gotham Books. 2003. Page 17. For anyone interested in grammar and other peculiarities of language, I highly recommend McWhorter’s Word on the Street: Debunking the Myth of "Pure" Standard English and Language Myths, edited by Laurie Bauer and Peter Trudgill.
The Absurdity of Philosophy 93
53
94 The Absurdity of Philosophy
54
55
The Absurdity of Philosophy 95
49
49 “This was our paradox: no course of action could be determined by a rule, because
every course of action can be made out to accord with the rule. The answer was: if everything can be made out to accord with the rule, then it can also be made out to conflict with it. And so there would be neither accord nor conflict.” Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. 2001. §201.
96 The Absurdity of Philosophy
56
50
50 “To acquire language, a child must devise a hypothesis compatible with presented
data – he must select from the store of potential grammars a specific one that is appropriate to the data available to him. It is logically possible that the data might be sufficiently rich and the class of potential grammars sufficiently limited so that no more that a single permitted grammar will be compatible with the available data at the moment of successful language acquisition, in our idealized ‘instantaneous’ model. In this case, no evaluation procedure will be necessary as a part of linguistic theory – that is, as an innate property of an organism or a device capable of language acquisition.” Chomsky, Noam. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 1965. Pages 36-37.
The Absurdity of Philosophy 97
51
baxy �� x a b �x y
y xa b �ny 1�ny � 2�ny
0�ny 11 �y 12 �y
3y 1�ny � 2�ny � 11� 3y 2� 4y
1�ny � 2�ny � 21� 4y 3�
51 “Thinking of language as an instinct inverts the popular wisdom, especially as it has
been passed down in the canon of the humanities and social sciences. Language is no more a cultural invention than is upright posture. It is not a manifestation of a general capacity to use symbols: a three-year-old… is a grammatical genius, but is quite incompetent at the visual arts, religious iconography, traffic signs, and the other staples of the semiotics curriculum.” Pinker, Steven. The Language Instinct. New York, NY: Harper Perennial Modern Classics. 2007. Page 5.
98 The Absurdity of Philosophy
52
bax � y
52 Everett, Daniel. “Cultural Constraints on Grammar and Cognition in Pirahã,”
Current Anthropology, Volume 46, Number 4, August-October 2005. PNG Language Resources. Summer Institute of Linguistics. <http://www.pnglanguages.org/americas/brasil/PUBLCNS/ANTHRO/PHGrCult.pdf>.
The Absurdity of Philosophy 99
a x b
53
53 Quine, Willard Van Orman. “Two Dogmas of Empiricism,” From a Logical Point of
View. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 1980.
100 The Absurdity of Philosophy
57
54
54 “It can be seen that there is a misunderstanding here from the mere fact that in the
course of our argument we give one interpretation after another; as if each one contented us at least for a moment, until we thought of yet another standing behind it. What this shews [sic] is that there is a way of grasping a rule which is not an interpretation, but which is exhibited in what we call ‘obeying the rule’ and ‘going against it’ in actual cases.” Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. 2001. §201.
The Absurdity of Philosophy 101
58
55
55 “In my view, the real ‘private language argument’ is to be found in the sections
preceding §243. Indeed, in §202 the conclusion is already stated explicitly: ‘Hence it is not possible to obey a rule ‘privately’: otherwise thinking one was obeying a rule would be the same thing as obeying it.’ I do not think that Wittgenstein here thought of himself as anticipating an argument he was to give in greater detail later. On the contrary, the crucial considerations are all contained in the discussion leading up to the conclusion stated in §202.” Kripke, Saul. Wittgenstein: On Rules and Private Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 1982. Page 3.
102 The Absurdity of Philosophy
59
60
56
57
56 Kripke, Saul. Wittgenstein: On Rules and Private Language. Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press. 1982. Pages 56-57. 57 Suter, Ronald. Interpreting Wittgenstein: A Cloud of Philosophy, A Drop of
Grammar. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press. 1989. Suter explains the criteriologist position at length in order to show in just what ways Wittgenstein was not a behaviorist.
The Absurdity of Philosophy 103
104 The Absurdity of Philosophy
61
The Absurdity of Philosophy 105
106 The Absurdity of Philosophy
62
The Absurdity of Philosophy 107
63
108 The Absurdity of Philosophy
64
65
The Absurdity of Philosophy 109
58
58 Martin, Robert M. The Meaning of Language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
1987. Page 29.
110 The Absurdity of Philosophy
66
67
The Absurdity of Philosophy 111
68
69
59
59 Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations. Malden, MA: Blackwell
Publishing. 2001. §303.
112 The Absurdity of Philosophy
70
The Absurdity of Philosophy 113
71
72
114 The Absurdity of Philosophy
73
The Absurdity of Philosophy 115
116 The Absurdity of Philosophy
74
The Absurdity of Philosophy 117
118 The Absurdity of Philosophy
75
The Absurdity of Philosophy 119
76
120 The Absurdity of Philosophy
60
60 Actually, this part of the story confuses me. Some versions have the little pigs
being eaten one-by-one and other versions have the pigs rushing off to the next pig’s house. In consideration for my younger readers, I will bypass the pornographic violence and use the latter version of the story.
The Absurdity of Philosophy 121
122 The Absurdity of Philosophy
The Absurdity of Philosophy 123
61 Twain, Mark. “My First Lie, And How I Got Out Of It.” The Complete Works of
Mark Twain. 1900. <http://www.mtwain.com/My_First_Lie,_And_How_I_Got_Out_Of_It/0.html>.
124 The Absurdity of Philosophy
77
62
62 And if you do, there is no way to equate what you find to what I find. There is no
public exchange, no language game. See Ludwig Wittgenstein’s private language argument as it regards beetles in boxes in §293 of Philosophical Investigations.
The Absurdity of Philosophy 125
78
7963
63 Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations. Malden, MA: Blackwell
Publishing. 2001. Page 190.
126 The Absurdity of Philosophy
80
81
The Absurdity of Philosophy 127
82
128 The Absurdity of Philosophy
83
The Absurdity of Philosophy 129
84
130 The Absurdity of Philosophy
The Absurdity of Philosophy 131
85
132 The Absurdity of Philosophy
86
The Absurdity of Philosophy 133
87
134 The Absurdity of Philosophy
88
The Absurdity of Philosophy 135
89
136 The Absurdity of Philosophy
90
91
The Absurdity of Philosophy 137
92
138 The Absurdity of Philosophy
93
94
The Absurdity of Philosophy 139
95
140 The Absurdity of Philosophy
96
97
The Absurdity of Philosophy 141
98
142 The Absurdity of Philosophy
99
The Absurdity of Philosophy 143
144 The Absurdity of Philosophy
The Absurdity of Philosophy 145
146 The Absurdity of Philosophy
The Absurdity of Philosophy 147
148 The Absurdity of Philosophy
100
64
64 Nietzsche, Friedrich. The Gay Science. New York, NY: Vintage Books. 1974.
§57.
The Absurdity of Philosophy 149
101
65
65 Wittgenstein, Ludwig, and Kenny Anthony ed. “Lecture on Ethics,” The
Wittgenstein Reader. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. 1994.
150 The Absurdity of Philosophy
The Absurdity of Philosophy 151
66
66 “For years, political people and lawyers - who, by the way, are the worst
communicators - used the phrase ‘estate tax.’ And for years they couldn't eliminate it. The public wouldn't support it because the word "estate" sounds wealthy. Someone like me comes around and realizes that it's not an estate tax, it's a death tax, because you're taxed at death. And suddenly something that isn't viable achieves the support of 75 percent of the American people. It's the same tax, but nobody really knows what an estate is. But they certainly know what it means to be taxed when you die. I argue that is a clarification; that's not an obfuscation.” Luntz, Frank. "Interview with Frank Luntz." Frontline: The Persuaders 15 Dec 2003.
<http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/persuaders/interviews/luntz.html>.
152 The Absurdity of Philosophy
67
67 Wittgenstein, Ludwig, and Kenny Anthony ed. “Lecture on Ethics,” The
Wittgenstein Reader. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. 1994. Page 291.
The Absurdity of Philosophy 153
154 The Absurdity of Philosophy
The Absurdity of Philosophy 155
156 The Absurdity of Philosophy
68
68 Wittgenstein, Ludwig, and Kenny Anthony ed. “Lecture on Ethics,” The
Wittgenstein Reader. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. 1994. Page 294.
The Absurdity of Philosophy 157
102
158 The Absurdity of Philosophy
The Absurdity of Philosophy 159
160 The Absurdity of Philosophy
103
104
105
The Absurdity of Philosophy 161
162 The Absurdity of Philosophy
106
69
69 Camus, Albert. “Create Dangerously,” Resistance, Rebellion, and Death. New
York, NY: Vintage International. 1988. Page 253.
The Absurdity of Philosophy 163
164 The Absurdity of Philosophy
The Absurdity of Philosophy 165
107
166 The Absurdity of Philosophy
The Absurdity of Philosophy 167
108
168 The Absurdity of Philosophy
109
110 70
70 A philosophical tool I developed in my first book, The Perpetual Wound (2006), for
extrapolating a deeper sense of emotion from a text.
The Absurdity of Philosophy 169
111
112
113
170 The Absurdity of Philosophy
The Absurdity of Philosophy 171
71
71 Andersen, Hans Christian. “The Emperor's New Clothes.” Wikisource. 1872.
Wikipedia. <http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Emperor's_New_Clothes>.
172 The Absurdity of Philosophy
The Absurdity of Philosophy 173
114
115
174 The Absurdity of Philosophy
The Absurdity of Philosophy 175
176 The Absurdity of Philosophy
The Absurdity of Philosophy 177
178 The Absurdity of Philosophy
72 116
72 Smith-Luedke, Jeff. “Will to Pride.” 2007.
The Absurdity of Philosophy 179
117
73
73 Camus, Albert. Notebooks 1935-1942. New York, NY: The Modern Library.
1965. Page 10.
180 The Absurdity of Philosophy
74
74 Twain, Mark. Letters From the Earth. New York, NY: Perennial Classics. 2004.
The Absurdity of Philosophy 181
182 The Absurdity of Philosophy
The Absurdity of Philosophy 183
Bibliography