The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
LEAD and MEPI Students’
Feedback Survey
Prepared by
Ola Anwar The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Spring
2012
Page 2 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Table of Contents Page
Executive Summary 3
Part I: General Demographics Information Please identify yourself 4 Gender 4 What is your cohort number? 4
Part II: LEAD Students 6
Section I: a. Does the coordinator try his/her best to treat all students with equality? 7 b. Please specify Please indicate your level of agreement regarding the following statements. 7 Section II: Student life values: Please indicate your level of agreement regarding the following statements. 13 Section III: Cross tabulations questions. 16 Section IV: Please suggest any areas for improvement. 35 Please feel free to add any other comments. 37
Part III: MEPI Students 38 Section I: a. Does the coordinator try his/her best to treat all students with equality? 39 b. Please specify Please indicate your level of agreement regarding the following statements. 39 Section II: Student life values: Please indicate your level of agreement regarding the following statements. 43 Section III: Cross tabulations questions. 46 Section IV: Please suggest any areas for improvement. 65 Please feel free to add any other comments. 65
Page 3 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Executive Summary
Introduction
As part of the Leadership for Education and Development Program (LEAD) and Middle East Partnership
Initiative Tomorrow's Leaders (MEPI TL) at the American University in Cairo (AUC), the LEAD/MEPI TL
program, conducted in cooperation with the Office of Institutional Research (IR) an online survey to
solicit the LEAD/MEPI TL students’ feedback about their coordinators within the LEAD/MEPI program
mission and objective. The LEAD/MEPI TL office intends to use the survey findings to improve their
program.
In May 16th, 2012 the Office of Institutional Research, emailed survey invitations to 275 students (233
LEAD and 42 MEPI). Two survey email reminders were sent on May 24 and June 12, 2012 and the survey
remained accessible until June 20th, 2012. When the survey was closed, from them there were 88 LEAD
students (37.8%) and 27 MEPI students (64.3%) completed the survey.
Methodology and Organization of the Report
This report is divided into three Parts.
Part I, general demographics’ information are presented as frequencies and as charts.
Part II, LEAD students and divided into four sections. Section I, includes the students’ evaluations to the
coordinators as frequencies and as charts. Student’s life values are presented in Section II, as
frequencies and as charts. In Section III, cross tabulation questions are presented in frequency tables. In
Section IV, the respondents’ comments and suggestions for more improvement are presented.
Part III, MEPI students and divided into four sections. Section I, includes the students’ evaluations to the
coordinators as frequencies and as charts. Student’s life values are presented in Section II, as
frequencies and as charts. In Section III, cross tabulation questions are presented in frequency tables. In
Section IV, the respondents’ comments and suggestions for more improvement are presented.
Page 4 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
The LEAD students presented 76.5% and the MEPI students presented 23.5%. Students’ gender
was 33% ‘male’, and 67% ‘female’.
The students’ cohort number was reported as follows: 4.3% of the students were from ‘cohort #
4’, 4.3% from ‘cohort #5’, 9.6% from ‘cohort # 6’, 16.5% from ‘cohort #7’; 40.9% from ‘cohort #8;
2.6% of the students were from ‘cohort # 9’; 2.6% of the students were from ‘cohort #10’, 7%
from ‘cohort #11’; 10.4% from ‘cohort #12’ and 1.7% did not report this question .
Table 1
Students' Category Frequency Percent
LEAD Student 88 76.5%
MEPI Student 27 23.5%
Total 115 100%
Figure 1
Table 2
Gender Frequency Percent
Male 38 33.0%
Female 77 67.0%
Total 115 100%
Figure 2
Part I
Students’ Demographics Information
Page 5 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Table 3
Cohort # Frequency Percent
4 5 4.3%
5 5 4.3%
6 11 9.6%
7 19 16.5%
8 47 40.9%
9 3 2.6%
10 3 2.6%
11 8 7.0%
12 12 10.4%
Missing 2 1.7%
Total 115 100%
Figure 3
Page 6 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Part II
LEAD Students
Page 7 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
In this section, when the LEAD students were asked “Does the coordinator try his/her best to treat all
students with equality?”, 65.9%% reported “Yes”, 29.5%% reported “No” and 4.5% did not answer this
question.
For the question, “My coordinator has an understanding of AUC’s liberal education system”, 45.5%
of the students reported ‘strongly agree’, 35.2% reported ‘agree’, 14.8% reported ‘neutral’, 3.4%
reported ‘disagree’, 1.1% reported ‘strongly disagree’.
For the question, “Individual and group meetings with my coordinator are sufficient”, 29.5% of the
students reported ‘strongly agree’, 36.4% reported ‘agree’, 12.5% reported ‘neutral’, 14.8% reported
‘disagree’, 5.7% reported ‘strongly disagree’ and 1.1% of the students did not report this question.
For the question, “My coordinator highlights the objectives of activities and link them to LEAD’s
overall outcomes and objectives”, 26.1% of the students reported ‘strongly agree’, 40.9% reported
‘agree’, 14.8% reported ‘neutral’, 9.1% reported ‘disagree’, 6.8% reported ‘strongly disagree’ and
2.3% did not answer this question.
For the question, “My coordinator encourages participatory planning and implementation of
activities”, 25% of the students reported ‘strongly agree’, 37.5% reported ‘agree’, 19.3% reported
‘neutral’, 12.5% reported ‘disagree’, 2.3% reported ‘strongly disagree’ and 3.4% did not report this
question.
For the question, “My coordinator encourages commitment to professionalism (e.g. meeting
deadlines, arriving on time and active class participation”, 42% of the students reported ‘strongly
agree’, 36.4% reported ‘agree’, 12.5% reported ‘neutral’, 5.7% reported ‘disagree’, 1.1% reported
‘strongly disagree’ and 2.3% did not report this question.
For the question, “My coordinator fosters team spirit and group work among students”, 27.3% of
the students reported ‘strongly agree’, 39.8% reported ‘agree’, 14.8% reported ‘neutral’, 10.2%
reported ‘disagree’, 5.7% reported ‘strongly disagree’ and 2.3% did not answer this question.
For the question, “My coordinator regularly asks for my feedback”, 23.9% of the students reported
‘strongly agree’, 26.1% reported ‘agree’, 25% reported ‘neutral’, 17% reported ‘disagree’, 6.8%
reported ‘strongly disagree’ and 1.1% did not report this question.
For the question, “My coordinator measures my learning though various assignment (e.g., post
training assignments, reflection forms and group projects)”, 21.6% of the students reported
‘strongly agree’, 46.6% reported ‘agree’, 14.8% reported ‘neutral’, 13.6% reported ‘disagree’, 2.3%
reported ‘strongly disagree’ and 1.1% did not answer this question.
Part II Section I
Page 8 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
For the question, “My coordinator encourages me to implement my leadership and civic
engagement activities in real life”, 29.5% of the students reported ‘strongly agree’, 40.9% reported
‘agree’, 11.4% reported ‘neutral’, 9.1% reported ‘disagree’, 5.7% reported ‘strongly disagree’ and
3.4% did not report this question.
For the question, “My coordinator is challenging me to use my maximum potential”, 25% of the
students reported ‘strongly agree’, 36.4% reported ‘agree’, 17% reported ‘neutral’, 13.6% reported
‘disagree’, 5.7% reported ‘strongly disagree’ and 2.3% did not answer this question.
For the question, “My coordinator monitors my academic progress and gives support if needed”,
34.1% of the students reported ‘strongly agree’, 37.5% reported ‘agree’, 12.5% reported ‘neutral’,
5.7% reported ‘disagree’, 9.1% reported ‘strongly disagree’, and 1.1% did not report this question.
Page 9 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Descriptive Analysis For
Part II Section I
Table 4
Does the coordinator try his/her best to treat all students with equality?
Frequency Percent
Yes 58 65.9%
No 26 29.5%
Missing 4 4.5%
Total 88 100%
Table 5
Strongly
Agree Agree Neutral Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Missing data
Total
My coordinator has an understanding of AUC's liberal education system
40 31 13 3 1 - 88
45.5% 35.2% 14.8% 3.4% 1.1% 0% 100%
Individual and group meetings with my coordinator are sufficient.
26 32 11 13 5 1 88
29.5% 36.4% 12.5% 14.8% 5.7% 1.1% 100%
My coordinator highlights the objectives of activities and link them to LEAD'S overall outcomes and objectives.
23 36 13 8 6 2 88
26.1% 40.9% 14.8% 9.1% 6.8% 2.3% 100%
My coordinator encourages participatory planning and implementation of activities.
22 33 17 11 2 3 88
25.0% 37.5% 19.3% 12.5% 2.3% 3.4% 100%
My coordinator encourages commitment to professionalism (e.g meeting deadlines, arriving on time and active class participation).
37 32 11 5 1 2 88
42.0% 36.4% 12.5% 5.7% 1.1% 2.3% 100%
My coordinator fosters team spirit and group work among students.
24 35 13 9 5 2 88
27.3% 39.8% 14.8% 10.2% 5.7% 2.3% 100%
My coordinator regularly asks for my feedback. 21 23 22 15 6 1 88
23.9% 26.1% 25.0% 17.0% 6.8% 1.1% 100%
My coordinator measures my learning though various assignment (e.g., post training assignments, reflection forms and group projects).
19 41 13 12 2 1 88
21.6% 46.6% 14.8% 13.6% 2.3% 1.1% 100%
My coordinator encourages me to implement my leadership and civic engagement activities in real life.
26 36 10 8 5 3 88
29.5% 40.9% 11.4% 9.1% 5.7% 3.4% 100%
My coordinator is challenging me to use my maximum potential.
22 32 15 12 5 2 88
25.0% 36.4% 17.0% 13.6% 5.7% 2.3% 100%
My coordinator monitors my academic progress and gives support if needed.
30 33 11 5 8 1 88
34.1% 37.5% 12.5% 5.7% 9.1% 1.1% 100%
Page 10 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Figure 5
Page 11 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Does the coordinator try his/her best to treat all students with equality? Please specify:
Negative comments:
1. She sometimes treat some students well unlike others
2. Students who are used to visit her office regularly are the ones who take the biggest share of
her interest. Those who do not, she does not even know their names and she does not ask
about them. For example, we did presentations this semester. Her close students got 16 out of
16 although they were not that perfect whereas the rest do not exceed 11 or 12 out of 16 and
she kept picking their mistakes in a non-constructive way!!
3. She is not fair at all and she does not equally treat all of students. She discriminates between
Christians and Muslims. She is very tough and not fair with Muslims while she is so generous to
Christians in grades, help and the manner of speaking and the way she treats them.
4. She is biased towards the feminist element in the cohort; she goes out a lot with them. She
can't isolate her personal life and her professional one. she is still very immature in taking
decisions
5. Our coordinator treats students who she likes well and gives them the highest grades in LPI.
Also, when some of us ask her about the semester abroad she tells them to give up because
they do not have the opportunity. During our presentations, some of us did not exert any effort
and they just got high marks while others who (I witnessed the situation) really exerted great
effort didn't get fair marks because our coordinator simply does not like them.
6. Yes, but she needs to try harder as some students still feel that they are not treated equally and
fairly.
7. She does not treat us equally and she does not hear anything but her own voice. Once I asked
her to change that date of Portfolio, which was only 2 days after our finals, because of the
presidential elections that were only 2 days after our finals, the same two days and we had to
travel to vote in our own governorate, she refused and only said, "I do not like to change my
decisions"!!!!!
8. She prefers some students and deal with them better than others.
9. She is completely far from equality. She loves some students, so she gives them more time,
more grades, accept their excuses, even if they do not make sense: 1- In a presentation, she
told one of those she loves, to say anything more, she even suggested for him some aspects to
mention and left him to add present them in an extra two minutes. 2- Once she disagreed with
one student and said to her, "if you do not like it, leave it" meaning the scholarship.
10. she is more biased to some students than to the rest of the students and she does not treat us
equally
11. There is a different treatment somehow in dealing with students. she sometimes ignores
serious excuses like academic circumstances
12. I think in the presentations, my coordinator was not that fair in grading the presentations. For
example, she allowed someone to re do the presentation! We did not know the rubric or the
criteria for grading. the thing was not that serious
Page 12 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
13. I think her mood affects her attitudes a lot!
14. May be she tries but doesn't succeed in doing so. she gives some students, who are close to
her, the chance to talk with her , meet her without appointment, and spend around two hours
with them in the office talking, and others not. She takes some students' opinions about
changes in the programs and schedules and others not.
15. she discriminates between students, for example: when we did our presentation she allowed a
student to repeat his presentation because she wasn't satisfied with his presentation on the
other hand she didn't give other students enough time to present and she always interrupted
them and told them to finish and hurry because she wanted to take the bus; moreover, it wasn't
a professional presentation because she didn't pay attention to some students because she was
thinking about the bus and gave us bad grades.
16. She likes students more than others and sometimes i feel ignored while i am in the same session
with them all. She asks for some opinions and just as if i do not exist in that situation she likes to
advise students more than others. She understands some students' situations and gives them
some privileges and because she does not have the same level of information and
understanding for others, she does not give them this privilege.
Positive Comments 1. She gives us more trainings and sessions to be good
2. She is great
3. Yes, no one is treated in a different or special way.
4. Our coordinator is just AWESOME!!
5. She always make sure that she sets with every one when needed
6. Although she may have close relationship with some of the student but she treat us all equally
and fairly.
7. She's fair to all regardless of who they are or where they're from.
General Comments 1. Most of the cases all the students get the chance to express themselves freely, but I guess that
there might be a thing between agreement with the coordinator's opinions in overall or what is
known in the LEAD office community as (attitude) and LPI grades. Some of office staff face any
opposing point of view as a negative attitude while whoever doing so might be trying to tell his
opinion in brief the staff need to be more welcoming to opposing point of views from students
with open mind and students too need to deliver their opinion accurately.
2. I have not seen her treating us differently or with bias
Page 13 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
In this section, the students indicate to what extent their life values were significant.
For the question, “My coordinator encourages diverse perspectives (i.e. discussions in religion, political
beliefs, culture, etc. ..), 25% of the students reported ‘strongly agree’, 36.4% reported ‘agree’, 14.8%
reported ‘neutral’, 12.5% reported ‘disagree’, 6.8% reported ‘strongly disagree’ and 4.5% did not report
this question.
For the question, “My coordinator encourages a two way dialogue with students”, 23.9% of the students
reported ‘strongly agree’, 30.7% reported ‘agree’, 21.6% reported ‘neutral’, 12.5% reported ‘disagree’,
6.8% reported ‘strongly disagree’ and 4.5% did not answer this question.
For the question, “My coordinator encourages me to express my opinion freely even if I disagree with
his/her opinion”, 35.2% of the students reported ‘strongly agree’, 28.4% reported ‘agree’, 13.6% reported
‘neutral’, 8% reported ‘disagree’, 10.2% reported ‘strongly disagree’ and 4.5% did not report this
question.
For the question, “My coordinator gives timely feedback/advice when needed”, 25% of the students
reported ‘strongly agree’, 43.2% reported ‘agree’, 14.8% reported ‘neural’, 6.8% reported ‘disagree’, 5.7%
reported ‘strongly disagree’ and 4.5% did not report this question.
For the question, “My coordinator creates a safe environment, where I can express myself”, 28.4% of
the students reported ‘strongly agree’, 28.4% reported ‘agree’, 13.6% reported ‘neutral’, 12.5% reported
‘disagree’, 11.4% reported ‘strongly disagree’, and 5.7% did not report this question.
For the question, “My coordinator explains the reason behind decisions/actions (i.e. selection process,
semester abroad, etc..)”, 23.9% of the students reported ‘strongly agree’, 33% reported ‘agree’, 20.5%
reported ‘neutral’, 4.5% reported ‘disagree’, 13.6% reported ‘strongly disagree’ and 4.5% did not answer
this question.
For the question, “My coordinator offers guidance/constructive feedback for my personal and
professional growth when needed”, 29.5% of the students reported ‘strongly agree’, 35.2% reported
‘agree’, 13.6% reported ‘neutral’, 5.7% reported ‘disagree’, 11.4% reported ‘strongly disagree’ and 4.5%
did not report this question.
For the question “My coordinator encourages participation in different learning/development
opportunities”, 31.8% of the students reported ‘strongly agree’, 36.4% reported ‘agree’, 17% reported
‘neutral’, 3.4% reported ‘disagree’, 5.7% reported ‘strongly disagree’ and 5.7% did not answer this
question.
Part II Section II
Page 14 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
For the question, “My coordinator has a solid understanding of AUC student life values which are:
integrity, professionalism, inclusivity, student centeredness and social responsibility”, 38.6% of the
student reported ‘strongly agree’, 37.5% reported ‘agree’, 12.5% reported ‘neutral’, 2.3% reported
‘disagree’, 2.3% reported ‘strongly disagree' and 6.8% did not report this question.
Descriptive Analysis For
Part II Section II
Table 6
Strongly
Agree Agree Neutral Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Missing Data
Total
My coordinator encourages diverse perspectives (i.e. discussions in religion, political beliefs, culture, etc..)
22 32 13 11 6 4 88
25.0% 36.4% 14.8% 12.5% 6.8% 4.5% 100%
My coordinator encourages a two way dialogue with students.
21 27 19 11 6 4 88
23.9% 30.7% 21.6% 12.5% 6.8% 4.5% 100%
My coordinator encourages me to express my opinion freely even if I disagree with his/her opinion.
31 25 12 7 9 4 88
35.2% 28.4% 13.6% 8.0% 10.2% 4.5% 100%
My coordinator gives timely feedback/advice when needed.
22 38 13 6 5 4 88
25.0% 43.2% 14.8% 6.8% 5.7% 4.5% 100%
My coordinator creates a safe environment, where I can express myself.
25 25 12 11 10 5 88
28.4% 28.4% 13.6% 12.5% 11.4% 5.7% 100%
My coordinator explains the reason behind decisions/actions, (i.e. selection process, semester abroad, etc..).
21 29 18 4 12 4 88
23.9% 33.0% 20.5% 4.5% 13.6% 4.5% 100%
My coordinator offers guidance/constructive feedback for my personal and professional growth when needed.
26 31 12 5 10 4 88
29.5% 35.2% 13.6% 5.7% 11.4% 4.5% 100%
My coordinator encourages participation in different learning/development opportunities.
28 32 15 3 5 5 88
31.8% 36.4% 17.0% 3.4% 5.7% 5.7% 100%
My coordinator has a solid understanding of AUC student life values which are: integrity, professionalism, inclusivity, student centeredness and social responsibility.
34 33 11 2 2 6 88
38.6% 37.5% 12.5% 2.3% 2.3% 6.8% 100%
Page 15 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Figure 6
Page 16 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
[The cohort #] by the level of agreement regarding different statements (Q.4)]
Table 7A
My coordinator has an understanding of AUC's liberal education system.
Total Strongly
Agree Agree Neutral Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Cohort #
4 2 2 - - - 4
50.0% 50.0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
5 3 2 - - - 5
60.0% 40.0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
6 6 5 - - - 11
54.5% 45.5% 0% 0% 0% 100%
7 14 3 1 1 - 19
73.7% 15.8% 5.3% 5.3% 0% 100%
8 14 19 11 2 1 47
29.8% 40.4% 23.4% 4.3% 2.1% 100%
Total 39 31 12 3 1 86
45.3% 36.0% 14.0% 3.5% 1.2% 100%
Table 7B
Individual and group meetings with my coordinator are sufficient.
Total Strongly
Agree Agree Neutral Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Cohort #
4 2 1 1 - - 4
50.0% 25.0% 25.0% 0% 0% 100%
5 1 3 - - - 4
25.0% 75.0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
6 7 2 2 - - 11
63.6% 18.2% 18.2% 0% 0% 100%
7 7 6 1 4 1 19
36.8% 31.6% 5.3% 21.1% 5.3% 100%
8 8 19 7 9 4 47
17.0% 40.4% 14.9% 19.1% 8.5% 100%
Total 25 31 11 13 5 85
29.4% 36.5% 12.9% 15.3% 5.9% 100%
Part II – Section III Cross Tabulation Questions
Page 17 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Table 7C
My coordinator highlights the objectives of activities and link them to LEAD'S overall
outcomes and objectives. Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
Cohort #
4 1 2 - - 1 4
25.0% 50.0% 0% 0% 25.0% 100%
5 - 3 - 2 - 5
0% 60.0% 0% 40.0% 0% 100%
6 5 3 2 - - 10
50.0% 30.0% 20.0% 0% 0% 100%
7 6 8 2 2 1 19
31.6% 42.1% 10.5% 10.5% 5.3% 100%
8 10 19 9 4 4 46
21.7% 41.3% 19.6% 8.7% 8.7% 100%
Total 22 35 13 8 6 84
26.2% 41.7% 15.5% 9.5% 7.1% 100%
Table 7D
My coordinator encourages participatory planning and implementation of activities.
Total Strongly
Agree Agree Neutral Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Cohort #
4 2 1 - 1 - 4
50.0% 25.0% 0% 25.0% 0% 100%
5 2 1 2 - - 5
40.0% 20.0% 40.0% 0% 0% 100%
6 5 2 1 1 1 10
50.0% 20.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 100%
7 3 11 2 1 1 18
16.7% 61.1% 11.1% 5.6% 5.6% 100%
8 9 17 12 8 - 46
19.6% 37.0% 26.1% 17.4% 0% 100%
Total 21 32 17 11 2 83
25.3% 38.6% 20.5% 13.3% 2.4% 100%
Page 18 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Table 7E
My coordinator encourages commitment to professionalism (e.g. meeting deadlines, arriving
on time and active class participation). Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
Cohort #
4 2 2 - - - 4
50.0% 50.0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
5 3 2 - - - 5
60.0% 40.0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
6 5 3 2 - - 10
50.0% 30.0% 20.0% 0% 0% 100%
7 6 10 2 1 - 19
31.6% 52.6% 10.5% 5.3% 0% 100%
8 20 14 7 4 1 46
43.5% 30.4% 15.2% 8.7% 2.2% 100%
Total 36 31 11 5 1 84
42.9% 36.9% 13.1% 6.0% 1.2% 100%
Table 7F
My coordinator fosters team spirit and group work among students.
Total Strongly
Agree Agree Neutral Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Cohort #
4 1 2 1 - - 4
25.0% 50.0% 25.0% 0% 0% 100%
5 1 4 - - - 5
20.0% 80.0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
6 6 3 1 - - 10
60.0% 30.0% 10.0% 0% 0% 100%
7 7 4 5 2 1 19
36.8% 21.1% 26.3% 10.5% 5.3% 100%
8 9 21 5 7 4 46
19.6% 45.7% 10.9% 15.2% 8.7% 100%
Total 24 34 12 9 5 84
28.6% 40.5% 14.3% 10.7% 6.0% 100%
Page 19 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Table 7G
My coordinator regularly asks for my feedback.
Total Strongly
Agree Agree Neutral Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Cohort #
4 1 2 - 1 - 4
25.0% 50.0% 0% 25.0% 0% 100%
5 1 3 0% 1 - 5
20.0% 60.0% 0.0% 20.0% 0% 100%
6 4 1 2 3 - 10
40.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 0% 100%
7 7 4 6 1 1 19
36.8% 21.1% 31.6% 5.3% 5.3% 100%
8 7 13 13 9 5 47
14.9% 27.7% 27.7% 19.1% 10.6% 100%
Total 20 23 21 15 6 85
23.5% 27.1% 24.7% 17.6% 7.1% 100%
Table 7H
My coordinator measures my learning though various assignment (e.g., post training
assignments, reflection forms and group projects). Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
Cohort #
4 2 2 - - - 4
50.0% 50.0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
5 1 3 - 1 - 5
20.0% 60.0% 0% 20.0% 0% 100%
6 4 4 1 1 - 10
40.0% 40.0% 10.0% 10.0% 0% 100%
7 5 5 6 3 - 19
26.3% 26.3% 31.6% 15.8% 0% 100%
8 6 26 6 7 2 47
12.8% 55.3% 12.8% 14.9% 4.3% 100%
Total 18 40 13 12 2 85
21.2% 47.1% 15.3% 14.1% 2.4% 100%
Page 20 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Table 7I
My coordinator encourages me to implement my leadership and civic engagement activities in real
life. Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
Cohort #
4 1 2 1 - - 4
25.0% 50.0% 25.0% 0% 0% 100%
5 1 4 - - - 5
20.0% 80.0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
6 6 3 1 - - 10
60.0% 30.0% 10.0% 0% 0% 100%
7 8 7 1 2 1 19
42.1% 36.8% 5.3% 10.5% 5.3% 100%
8 9 19 7 6 4 45
20.0% 42.2% 15.6% 13.3% 8.9% 100%
Total 25 35 10 8 5 83
30.1% 42.2% 12.0% 9.6% 6.0% 100%
Table 7J
My coordinator is challenging me to use my maximum potential.
Total Strongly
Agree Agree Neutral Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Cohort #
4 1 - 2 1 - 4
25.0% 0% 50.0% 25.0% 0% 100%
5 1 3 1 - - 5
20.0% 60.0% 20.0% 0% 0% 100%
6 4 3 - 2 - 9
44.4% 33.3% 0% 22.2% 0% 100%
7 5 8 3 2 1 19
26.3% 42.1% 15.8% 10.5% 5.3% 100%
8 11 16 9 7 4 47
23.4% 34.0% 19.1% 14.9% 8.5% 100%
Total 22 30 15 12 5 84
26.2% 35.7% 17.9% 14.3% 6.0% 100%
Page 21 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Table 7K
My coordinator monitors my academic progress and gives support if needed.
Total Strongly
Agree Agree Neutral Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Cohort #
4 2 2 - - - 4
50.0% 50.0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
5 1 4 - - - 5
20.0% 80.0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
6 5 3 2 - - 10
50.0% 30.0% 20.0% 0% 0% 100%
7 8 10 - 1 - 19
42.1% 52.6% 0% 5.3% 0% 100%
8 13 14 8 4 8 47
27.7% 29.8% 17.0% 8.5% 17.0% 100%
Total 29 33 10 5 8 85
34.1% 38.8% 11.8% 5.9% 9.4% 100%
Page 22 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Cross tabulation question [The cohort # by the level of agreement regarding other different statements (Q.5)]
Table 8A
My coordinator encourages diverse perspectives (i.e. discussions in religion, political beliefs,
culture, etc..) Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
Cohort #
4 1 1 1 1 - 4
25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 0% 100%
5 1 2 1 - - 4
25.0% 50.0% 25.0% 0% 0% 100%
6 5 2 2 1 - 10
50.0% 20.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0% 100%
7 4 9 3 2 1 19
21.1% 47.4% 15.8% 10.5% 5.3% 100%
8 10 17 6 7 5 45
22.2% 37.8% 13.3% 15.6% 11.1% 100%
Total 21 31 13 11 6 82
25.6% 37.8% 15.9% 13.4% 7.3% 100%
Table 8B
My coordinator encourages a two way dialogue with students.
Total Strongly
Agree Agree Neutral Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Cohort #
4 1 2 1 - - 4
25.0% 50.0% 25.0% 0% 0% 100%
5 1 2 1 - - 4
25.0% 50.0% 25.0% 0% 0% 100%
6 5 2 1 2 - 10
50.0% 20.0% 10.0% 20.0% 0% 100%
7 4 8 3 3 1 19
21.1% 42.1% 15.8% 15.8% 5.3% 100%
8 9 13 12 6 5 45
20.0% 28.9% 26.7% 13.3% 11.1% 100%
Total 20 27 18 11 6 82
24.4% 32.9% 22.0% 13.4% 7.3% 100%
Page 23 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Table 8C
My coordinator encourages me to express my opinion freely even if I disagree with his/her
opinion. Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
Cohort #
4 1 2 1 - - 4
25.0% 50.0% 25.0% 0% 0% 100%
5 2 1 - 1 - 4
50.0% 25.0% 0% 25.0% 0% 100%
6 6 1 1 2 - 10
60.0% 10.0% 10.0% 20.0% 0% 100%
7 8 7 3 - 1 19
42.1% 36.8% 15.8% 0% 5.3% 100%
8 13 13 7 4 8 45
28.9% 28.9% 15.6% 8.9% 17.8% 100%
Total 30 24 12 7 9 82
36.6% 29.3% 14.6% 8.5% 11.0% 100%
Table 8D
My coordinator gives timely feedback/advice when needed.
Total Strongly
Agree Agree Neutral Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Cohort #
4 1 3 - - - 4
25.0% 75.0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
5 1 3 - - - 4
25.0% 75.0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
6 4 3 3 - - 10
40.0% 30.0% 30.0% 0% 0% 100%
7 7 11 1 - - 19
36.8% 57.9% 5.3% 0% 0% 100%
8 8 18 8 6 5 45
17.8% 40.0% 17.8% 13.3% 11.1% 100%
Total 21 38 12 6 5 82
25.6% 46.3% 14.6% 7.3% 6.1% 100%
Page 24 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Table 8E
My coordinator creates a safe environment, where I can express myself.
Total Strongly
Agree Agree Neutral Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Cohort #
4 1 2 1 - - 4
25.0% 50.0% 25.0% 0% 0% 100%
5 1 1 1 1 - 4
25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 0% 100%
6 4 2 3 1 - 10
40.0% 20.0% 30.0% 10.0% 0% 100%
7 7 6 1 2 2 18
38.9% 33.3% 5.6% 11.1% 11.1% 100%
8 11 13 6 7 8 45
24.4% 28.9% 13.3% 15.6% 17.8% 100%
Total 24 24 12 11 10 81
29.6% 29.6% 14.8% 13.6% 12.3% 100%
Table 8F
My coordinator explains the reason behind decisions/actions, (i.e. selection process, semester
abroad, etc..). Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
Cohort #
4 2 2 - - - 4
50.0% 50.0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
5 2 2 - - - 4
50.0% 50.0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
6 4 1 2 2 1 10
40.0% 10.0% 20.0% 20.0% 10.0% 100%
7 5 7 5 - 2 19
26.3% 36.8% 26.3% 0% 10.5% 100%
8 7 16 11 2 9 45
15.6% 35.6% 24.4% 4.4% 20.0% 100%
Total 20 28 18 4 12 82
24.4% 34.1% 22.0% 4.9% 14.6% 100%
Page 25 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Table 8G
My coordinator offers guidance/constructive feedback for my personal and professional growth
when needed. Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
Cohort #
4 1 2 - 1 - 4
25.0% 50.0% 0% 25.0% 0% 100%
5 2 2 - - - 4
50.0% 50.0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
6 5 3 1 1 - 10
50.0% 30.0% 10.0% 10.0% 0% 100%
7 8 7 2 - 2 19
42.1% 36.8% 10.5% 0% 10.5% 100%
8 9 17 8 3 8 45
20.0% 37.8% 17.8% 6.7% 17.8% 100%
Total 25 31 11 5 10 82
30.5% 37.8% 13.4% 6.1% 12.2% 100%
Table 8H
My coordinator encourages participation in different learning/development opportunities.
Total Strongly
Agree Agree Neutral Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Cohort #
4 1 2 - 1 - 4
25.0% 50.0% 0% 25.0% 0% 100%
5 3 1 - - - 4
75.0% 25.0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
6 4 5 1 - - 10
40.0% 50.0% 10.0% 0% 0% 100%
7 8 7 4 - - 19
42.1% 36.8% 21.1% 0% 0% 100%
8 12 15 10 2 5 44
27.3% 34.1% 22.7% 4.5% 11.4% 100%
Total 28 30 15 3 5 81
34.6% 37.0% 18.5% 3.7% 6.2% 100%
Page 26 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Table 8I
My coordinator has a solid understanding of AUC student life values which are: integrity,
professionalism, inclusivity, studentcenteredness and social responsibility. Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
Cohort #
4 1 3 - - - 4
25.0% 75.0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
5 3 1 - - - 4
75.0% 25.0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
6 5 5 - - - 10
50.0% 50.0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
7 10 8 - - - 18
55.6% 44.4% 0% 0% 0% 100%
8 14 15 11 2 2 44
31.8% 34.1% 25.0% 4.5% 4.5% 100%
Total 33 32 11 2 2 80
41.3% 40.0% 13.8% 2.5% 2.5% 100%
Page 27 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Cross tabulation questions
[Gender by the level of agreement regarding different statements (Q.4)]
Table 9A
My coordinator has an understanding of AUC's liberal education system.
Total Strongly
Agree Agree Neutral Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Gender
Male 16 9 4 - - 29
55.2% 31.0% 13.8% 0% 0% 100%
Female 24 22 9 3 1 59
40.7% 37.3% 15.3% 5.1% 1.7% 100%
Total 40 31 13 3 1 88
45.5% 35.2% 14.8% 3.4% 1.1% 100%
Table 9B
Individual and group meetings with my coordinator are sufficient.
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
Gender
Male 9 14 3 3 - 29
31.0% 48.3% 10.3% 10.3% 0% 100%
Female 17 18 8 10 5 58
29.3% 31.0% 13.8% 17.2% 8.6% 100%
Total 26 32 11 13 5 87
29.9% 36.8% 12.6% 14.9% 5.7% 100%
Table 9C
My coordinator highlights the objectives of activities and link them to LEAD'S overall
outcomes and objectives. Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
Gender
Male 9 14 1 3 - 27
33.3% 51.9% 3.7% 11.1% 0% 100%
Female 14 22 12 5 6 59
23.7% 37.3% 20.3% 8.5% 10.2% 100%
Total 23 36 13 8 6 86
26.7% 41.9% 15.1% 9.3% 7.0% 100%
Page 28 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Table 9D
My coordinator encourages participatory planning and implementation of activities.
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
Gender
Male 8 10 4 5 - 27
29.6% 37.0% 14.8% 18.5% 0% 100%
Female 14 23 13 6 2 58
24.1% 39.7% 22.4% 10.3% 3.4% 100%
Total 22 33 17 11 2 85
25.9% 38.8% 20.0% 12.9% 2.4% 100%
Table 9E
My coordinator encourages commitment to professionalism (e.g. meeting deadlines, arriving
on time and active class participation). Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
Gender
Male 12 9 5 1 - 27
44.4% 33.3% 18.5% 3.7% 0% 100%
Female 25 23 6 4 1 59
42.4% 39.0% 10.2% 6.8% 1.7% 100%
Total 37 32 11 5 1 86
43.0% 37.2% 12.8% 5.8% 1.2% 100%
Table 9F
My coordinator fosters team spirit and group work among students.
Total Strongly
Agree Agree Neutral Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Gender
Male 8 13 3 4 - 28
28.6% 46.4% 10.7% 14.3% 0% 100%
Female 16 22 10 5 5 58
27.6% 37.9% 17.2% 8.6% 8.6% 100%
Total 24 35 13 9 5 86
27.9% 40.7% 15.1% 10.5% 5.8% 100%
Page 29 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Table 9G
My coordinator regularly asks for my feedback.
Total Strongly
Agree Agree Neutral Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Gender
Male 10 6 10 2 - 28
35.7% 21.4% 35.7% 7.1% 0% 100%
Female 11 17 12 13 6 59
18.6% 28.8% 20.3% 22.0% 10.2% 100%
Total 21 23 22 15 6 87
24.1% 26.4% 25.3% 17.2% 6.9% 100%
Table 9H
My coordinator measures my learning though various assignment (e.g., post training
assignments, reflection forms and group projects). Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
Gender
Male 6 13 4 5 - 28
21.4% 46.4% 14.3% 17.9% 0% 100%
Female 13 28 9 7 2 59
22.0% 47.5% 15.3% 11.9% 3.4% 100%
Total 19 41 13 12 2 87
21.8% 47.1% 14.9% 13.8% 2.3% 100%
Table 9I
My coordinator encourages me to implement my leadership and civic engagement activities in real
life. Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
Gender
Male 12 8 2 5 - 27
44.4% 29.6% 7.4% 18.5% 0% 100%
Female 14 28 8 3 5 58
24.1% 48.3% 13.8% 5.2% 8.6% 100%
Total 26 36 10 8 5 85
30.6% 42.4% 11.8% 9.4% 5.9% 100%
Page 30 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Table 9J
My coordinator is challenging me to use my maximum potential.
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
Gender
Male 10 10 5 3 - 28
35.7% 35.7% 17.9% 10.7% 0% 100%
Female 12 22 10 9 5 58
20.7% 37.9% 17.2% 15.5% 8.6% 100%
Total 22 32 15 12 5 86
25.6% 37.2% 17.4% 14.0% 5.8% 100%
Table 9K
My coordinator monitors my academic progress and gives support if needed.
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
Gender
Male 14 9 2 2 1 28
50.0% 32.1% 7.1% 7.1% 3.6% 100%
Female 16 24 9 3 7 59
27.1% 40.7% 15.3% 5.1% 11.9% 100%
Total 30 33 11 5 8 87
34.5% 37.9% 12.6% 5.7% 9.2% 100%
Page 31 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Cross tabulation question [Gender by the level of agreement regarding other different statements (Q.5)]
Table 10A
My coordinator encourages diverse perspectives (i.e. discussions in religion, political beliefs,
culture, etc..) Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
Gender
Male 7 13 3 2 - 25
28.0% 52.0% 12.0% 8.0% 0% 100%
Female 15 19 10 9 6 59
25.4% 32.2% 16.9% 15.3% 10.2% 100%
Total 22 32 13 11 6 84
26.2% 38.1% 15.5% 13.1% 7.1% 100%
Table 10B
My coordinator encourages a two way dialogue with students.
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
Gender
Male 8 9 4 4 - 25
32.0% 36.0% 16.0% 16.0% 0% 100%
Female 13 18 15 7 6 59
22.0% 30.5% 25.4% 11.9% 10.2% 100%
Total 21 27 19 11 6 84
25.0% 32.1% 22.6% 13.1% 7.1% 100%
Table 10C
My coordinator encourages me to express my opinion freely even if I disagree with his/her
opinion. Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
Gender
Male 9 11 2 3 - 25
36.0% 44.0% 8.0% 12.0% 0% 100%
Female 22 14 10 4 9 59
37.3% 23.7% 16.9% 6.8% 15.3% 100%
Total 31 25 12 7 9 84
36.9% 29.8% 14.3% 8.3% 10.7% 100%
Page 32 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Table 10D
My coordinator gives timely feedback/advice when needed.
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
Gender
Male 8 13 1 2 1 25
32.0% 52.0% 4.0% 8.0% 4.0% 100%
Female 14 25 12 4 4 59
23.7% 42.4% 20.3% 6.8% 6.8% 100%
Total 22 38 13 6 5 84
26.2% 45.2% 15.5% 7.1% 6.0% 100%
Table 10E
My coordinator creates a safe environment, where I can express myself.
Total Strongly
Agree Agree Neutral Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Gender
Male 10 9 2 3 1 25
40.0% 36.0% 8.0% 12.0% 4.0% 100%
Female 15 16 10 8 9 58
25.9% 27.6% 17.2% 13.8% 15.5% 100%
Total 25 25 12 11 10 83
30.1% 30.1% 14.5% 13.3% 12.0% 100%
Table 10F
My coordinator explains the reason behind decisions/actions, (i.e. selection process, semester
abroad, etc..). Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
Gender
Male 8 8 6 2 1 25
32.0% 32.0% 24.0% 8.0% 4.0% 100%
Female 13 21 12 2 11 59
22.0% 35.6% 20.3% 3.4% 18.6% 100%
Total 21 29 18 4 12 84
25.0% 34.5% 21.4% 4.8% 14.3% 100%
Page 33 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Table 10G
My coordinator offers guidance/constructive feedback for my personal and professional growth
when needed. Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
Gender
Male 9 9 3 3 1 25
36.0% 36.0% 12.0% 12.0% 4.0% 100%
Female 17 22 9 2 9 59
28.8% 37.3% 15.3% 3.4% 15.3% 100%
Total 26 31 12 5 10 84
31.0% 36.9% 14.3% 6.0% 11.9% 100%
Table 10H
My coordinator encourages participation in different learning/development opportunities.
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
Gender
Male 11 8 4 1 1 25
44.0% 32.0% 16.0% 4.0% 4.0% 100%
Female 17 24 11 2 4 58
29.3% 41.4% 19.0% 3.4% 6.9% 100%
Total 28 32 15 3 5 83
33.7% 38.6% 18.1% 3.6% 6.0% 100%
Table 10I
My coordinator has a solid understanding of AUC student life values which are: integrity,
professionalism, inclusivity, student centeredness and social responsibility. Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
Gender
Male 11 11 1 1 - 24
45.8% 45.8% 4.2% 4.2% 0% 100%
Female 23 22 10 1 2 58
39.7% 37.9% 17.2% 1.7% 3.4% 100%
Total 34 33 11 2 2 82
41.5% 40.2% 13.4% 2.4% 2.4% 100%
Page 34 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
“Cohort #” by the question “Does the coordinator try his/her best to treat all students with equality?”
Table 11
Does the coordinator try his/her best to treat all students with equality?
By Cohort
Total
Yes No
Cohort # 4
4 - 4
100% 0% 100%
5 2 2 4
50.0% 50.0% 100%
6 8 2 10
80.0% 20.0% 100%
7 15 4 19
78.9% 21.1% 100%
8 27 18 45
60.0% 40.0% 100%
Total 56 26 82
68.3% 31.7% 100%
“Gender” by the question “Does the coordinator try his/her best to treat all students with
equality?”
Table12
Does the coordinator try his/her best to
treat all students with equality?
By Gender
Total
Yes No
Gender
Male 20 5 25
80.0% 20.0% 100%
Female 38 21 59
64.4% 35.6% 100%
Total 58 26 84
69.0% 31.0% 100%
Page 35 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Q. 7: Please suggest any areas for improvement:
1. She is doing her best to make us good leaders
2. The coordinator must listen to us more and she has to know that she is there to make our lives
easier not to make it more complicated by refusing our requests and keep asking us to do things
with explaining any reasons. Easier and more effective communication please. The trainings,
the retreats and the sessions we take with LEAD are not beneficial at all and most of us think
they just waste our time and we do not learn something new through them; you can see this
through our evaluation after every session.
3. 1. for the past few semesters, retreats were fun, i won't deny that, but there was minimal
benefits out of it if any, I would say budgets should be spent more wisely. like for example, we
visited governorates and discussed with governors in our first year, which is when we didn't
have such necessary skills to be able to really 'discuss' and make the most use out of the
program. then, when we were one or two years from graduation, which is when we should be
more challenged, or even given more practical and professional trainings, we only went on
outings and retreats. it was good, but it was not structured like a cohort retreat, there were no
collective or team activities that got us as a team to work with or even get to know each other
better, but every group considered it a different outing. Which i don't believe is the objective of
the retreat. 2. Major advantages, that we get as LEAD students, aren't clearly communicated
to us, like for example the option that the LEAD can cover conference expenses if the student is
participating in an international conference. I personally did not know anything about this, until I
asked, only after my department couldn't get me a conference grant and my professor asked if
my scholarship program could cover it. In the end, it wasn't covered because I asked less than
one month ahead, but what annoyed me is that this is a right we should be clearly informed of,
imagine that every student gets the chance to have one conference completely covered, which
would help much in their development, and has no idea about this. 3. I do not personally feel
that the office cares about the best for the LEAD students, if so, why doesn't it inform students
who have credits to pay that the sooner they pay for it, the better for them? why doesn't it
spend the budget in a way that ensures that as LEAD students graduate they are extremely
developed not just 'had a nice time'. 4. Why didn't the office discuss with us Islam Kamel's
case, and put into consideration he was almost done! we all know the reason he got his F grades
is that he was involved in some serious situation in Tahrir, we all believe the LEAD office could
have done more and literally saved Islam future. 5. As a graduating senior, I am really very
thankful, that I am lucky enough to have had a full scholarship at AUC, I do not want to send a
wrong message, and say it was full of mistakes. But it is not only a full scholarship! it's not paying
my expenses for buses, courses and books, it's supposed to developing me too, and I do find the
Part III Section IV
LEAD General comments
Page 36 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
LEAD program responsible for thinking about all the ways that can develop students, not leave
that to student's suggestions specifically during finals week!. LEAD program should think of the
most beneficial trainings and events and encourage students to go and participate and LEAD and
help us develop throughout the process. I hope the LEAD program solves these issues and
provides better opportunities to current LEAD students, because they deserve better.
4. treating students with equality
5. She is the best and I’m honestly saying the truth not for any extra points :D as you know she is
leaving , so all what I’m saying is just to show how much she is amazing. i just want to say that
any word of appreciation will not be sufficient to express how much am grateful to have her as
coordinator and a friend. I'm really going to miss her and wish her the best of luck.
6. The coordinator has to look for what's best for the students and walk them through it, but not
choose the easy path that makes them in safety and waste an opportunity for them.
7. I think it would be better if the coordinator can effectively separate between work and
friendship. I think that the coordinator is a good friend for some student while others want to
keep this as a healthy work professional relationship.
8. Training should be meeting students' expectations.
9. she needs to listen to us when we ask her to push the deadlines a little bit.
10. I hope that the training sessions won't clash with important events held by the university like
the career mart in the coming years.
11. I would prefer to change her. Or at least put someone above her to find her/him when she
treats us like this
12. there should be more discussion and democracy in making decisions
13. I suggest changing her a survey per semester will not be enough. Also, I suggest a supervisor to
watch her as she is really too unprofessional especially with some of us who disagree with her.
14. She should treat students equally and care more for our academic life not only the activities.
15. She needs to be more flexible. this doesn't mean to break the rules I am totally against that but
some sometimes I feel that she somehow aggressive
16. I guess, the way of communication can be improved, no need for complementing students too
much to the extent that i don't feel it real. she can encourage us without this over
complementing We should be informed with the criteria or the rubric for the grading.
17. Our coordinator has many great and professional skills that I, honestly, benefit from. But i think
she should give all of us the same chances to express ourselves. She doesn't give me feedback,
except when I ask her! But I think it's better to give me feedback, when she notice something
about me and won't wait till she give me the LPI to improve myself. I think it's better to keep
feeding me with notices and advice to improve myself faster and better.
18. My coordinator has a non-friendly approach while dealing with professional requirements, so i
suggest that she deals with us from the perspective of understanding and being on our side and
at the same time, follow the LEAD rules and we will submit the requirements but in a more
loving way bearing in mind that she wants to follow the rules but she totally understand how we
feel and why we are asking for certain things. In other words, i need to feel her trust and care
for my benefit while applying LEAD regulations.
Page 37 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
19. Equality between students; not to prefer one to the other. Less meetings and training.
Training, retreats and meetings to be more effective and useful.
Q.8: Other comments:
Negative Comment:
1. She is unfair
2. We need: 1-more care from the coordinator; she has never sent any individual mails!! 2-
accepting our valid excuses. 3-easier and more effective communication. 4-more organized
and effective sessions with more efficient and interesting topics. 5-mor consideration about
our busy time and about our academic life while deciding on the timing of any session or
any retreat or deadlines. 6-more consideration about our values, especially for Muslims.
While asking us for doing some team building games.
3. The rules of the LEAD program are not strict at all. When I ask my coordinator about
something related to LEAD regulations, the answer is always "It depends on the situation" I
have some decisions to make that are very important and related to a strict yes or no.
4. The coordinator should be changed
5. I just hope to feel justice even justice in applying injustice to feel that our work is not invain.
6. I guess there is also a kind of discrimination between students! I can see that. However, I did
not have something personal to be honest!
7. I don't really feel comfortable with my coordinator, because she doesn't listen to me, and if
she doesn't take my words as real. I feel afraid of her. She disappoints me every time I tell
her any problem I face.
8. She is neither fair nor democratic. She doesn't take our opinions in making decisions and
choosing retreats places or sessions topics.
Positive Comments:
1. Thank you LEAD program, I appreciate your efforts so far, and appreciate the surveys I hope
our points will be considered.
2. She is one of the best coordinators of the office. Thank you and thanks to her for everything.
I am learning a lot and changing because of the environment offered for me
General comments:
1. She needs to be more fixable and accept our excuses.
2. We should have the chance to choose the trainings that we need not the coordinator.
3. Hoda is the best coordinator i have ever dealt with. She is so professional and caring. She gives
me all the help i need and she always tries to make me realize who i am. Although it has been
only one year since she became the coordinator of LEAD 7, but i really learnt a lot from her. She
really made me grow up and look at other things from different ways.
Page 38 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Part III
MEPI Students
Page 39 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
In this section, when the MEPI students were asked “Does the coordinator try his/her best to treat all
students with equality?”, 88.9%% reported “Yes”, 3.7%% reported “No” and 7.4% did not answer this
question.
For the question, “My coordinator has an understanding of AUC’s liberal education system”,
students reported only 85.2% ‘strongly agree’ and 14.8% reported ‘agree’,
For the question, “Individual and group meetings with my coordinator are sufficient”, 55.6% of the
students reported ‘strongly agree’, 33.3% reported ‘agree’, 7.4% reported ‘neutral’, 3.7% reported
‘disagree’, and no one reported ‘strongly disagree’.
For the question, “My coordinator highlights the objectives of activities and link them to LEAD’s
overall outcomes and objectives”, 63% of the students reported ‘strongly agree’, 18.5% reported
‘agree’, 14.8% reported ‘neutral’, no one reported ‘disagree’, or ‘strongly disagree’ and 3.7% did not
answer this question.
For the question, “My coordinator encourages participatory planning and implementation of
activities”, students reported only 59.3% ‘strongly agree’ and 40.7% reported ‘agree’.
For the question, “My coordinator encourages commitment to professionalism (e.g. meeting
deadlines, arriving on time and active class participation”, 70.4% of the students reported ‘strongly
agree’, 18.5% reported ‘agree’, 11.1% reported ‘neutral’, no one reported ‘disagree’, or ‘strongly
disagree’.
For the question, “My coordinator fosters team spirit and group work among students”, 59.3% of
the students reported ‘strongly agree’, 37% reported ‘agree’, 3.7% reported ‘neutral’, no one
reported ‘disagree’, or ‘strongly disagree’.
For the question, “My coordinator regularly asks for my feedback”, 48.1% of the students reported
‘strongly agree’, 22.2% reported ‘agree’, 22.2% reported ‘neutral’, 7.4% reported ‘disagree’, no one
reported ‘strongly disagree’.
For the question, “My coordinator measures my learning though various assignment (e.g., post
training assignments, reflection forms and group projects)”, 51.9% of the students reported
‘strongly agree’, 33.3% reported ‘agree’, 11.1% reported ‘neutral’, 3.7% reported ‘disagree’, no one
reported ‘strongly disagree’.
Part III Section I
Page 40 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
For the question, “My coordinator encourages me to implement my leadership and civic
engagement activities in real life”, 66.7% of the students reported ‘strongly agree’, 22.2% reported
‘agree’, 11.1% reported ‘neutral’, no one reported ‘disagree’, or ‘strongly disagree’.
For the question, “My coordinator is challenging me to use my maximum potential”, 51.9% of the
students reported ‘strongly agree’, 18.5% reported ‘agree’, 18.5% reported ‘neutral’, 7.4% reported
‘disagree’, 3.7% reported ‘strongly disagree’.
For the question, “My coordinator monitors my academic progress and gives support if needed”,
63% of the students reported ‘strongly agree’, 18.5% reported ‘agree’, 18.5% reported ‘neutral’, no
one reported ‘disagree’, or ‘strongly disagree’.
Descriptive Analysis
For
Part III Section I
Table 13
Does the coordinator try his/her best to treat all students with equality?
Frequency Percent
Yes 24 88.9%
No 1 3.7%
Missing 2 7.4%
Total 27 100%%
Page 41 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Table 14
Strongly
Agree Agree Neutral Disagree
Strongly disagree
Missing Data
Total
My coordinator has an understanding of AUC's liberal education system
23 4 - - - - 27
85.2% 14.8% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
Individual and group meetings with my coordinator are sufficient.
15 9 2 1 - - 27
55.6% 33.3% 7.4% 3.7% 0% 0% 100%
My coordinator highlights the objectives of activities and link them to LEAD'S overall outcomes and objectives.
17 5 4 - - 1 27
63.0% 18.5% 14.8% 0% 0% 3.7% 100%
My coordinator encourages participatory planning and implementation of activities.
16 11 - - - - 27
59.3% 40.7% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
My coordinator encourages commitment to professionalism (e.g meeting deadlines, arriving on time and active class participation).
19 5 3 - - - 27
70.4% 18.5% 11.1% 0% 0% 0% 100%
My coordinator fosters team spirit and group work among students.
16 10 1 - - - 27
59.3% 37.0% 3.7% 0% 0% 0% 100%
My coordinator regularly asks for my feedback.
13 6 6 2 - - 27
48.1% 22.2% 22.2% 7.4% 0% 0% 100%
My coordinator measures my learning though various assignment (e.g., post training assignments, reflection forms and group projects).
14 9 3 1 - - 27
51.9% 33.3% 11.1% 3.7% 0% 0% 100%
My coordinator encourages me to implement my leadership and civic engagement activities in real life.
18 6 3 - - - 27
66.7% 22.2% 11.1% 0% 0% 0% 100%
My coordinator is challenging me to use my maximum potential.
14 5 5 2 1 - 27
51.9% 18.5% 18.5%% 7.4% 3.7% 0% 100%
My coordinator monitors my academic progress and gives support if needed.
17 5 5 - - - 27
63.0% 18.5% 18.5% 0% 0% 0% 100%
Page 42 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Figure 14
Does the coordinator try his/her best to treat all students with equality? Please specify:
She's fair to all regardless of who they are or where they're from.
She doesn't treat anyone in a special way, everyone is equally helped and equally encouraged to
participate in different activities.
Page 43 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
In this section, the students indicate to what extent their life values were significant.
For the question, “My coordinator encourages diverse perspectives (i.e. discussions in religion, political
beliefs, culture, etc. ..), 70.4% of the students reported ‘strongly agree’, 22.2% reported ‘agree’, no one
reported ‘neutral’, ‘disagree’, or ‘strongly disagree’ and 7.4% did not report this question.
For the question, “My coordinator encourages a two way dialogue with students”, 55.6% of the students
reported ‘strongly agree’, 37% reported ‘agree’, no one reported ‘neutral’, ‘disagree’, or ‘strongly
disagree’ and 7.4% did not answer this question.
For the question, “My coordinator encourages me to express my opinion freely even if I disagree with
his/her opinion”, 70.4% of the students reported ‘strongly agree’, 22.2% reported ‘agree’, no one
reported ‘neutral’, ‘disagree’, or ‘strongly disagree’ and 7.4% did not report this question.
For the question, “My coordinator gives timely feedback/advice when needed”, 63% of the students
reported ‘strongly agree’, 25.9% reported ‘agree’, no one reported ‘neural’, 3.7% reported ‘disagree’, no
one reported ‘strongly disagree’ and 7.4% did not report this question.
For the question, “My coordinator creates a safe environment, where I can express myself”, 63% of the
students reported ‘strongly agree’, 25.9% reported ‘agree’, 3.7% reported ‘neutral’, no one reported
‘disagree’, or ‘strongly disagree’, and 7.4% did not report this question.
For the question, “My coordinator explains the reason behind decisions/actions (i.e. selection process,
semester abroad, etc..)”, 59.3% of the students reported ‘strongly agree’, 25.9% reported ‘agree’, 3.7%
reported ‘neutral’, no one reported ‘disagree’, or ‘strongly disagree’ and 11.1% did not answer this
question.
For the question, “My coordinator offers guidance/constructive feedback for my personal and
professional growth when needed”, 63% of the students reported ‘strongly agree’, .22.2% reported
‘agree,’ 3.7% reported ‘neutral’, 3.7% reported ‘disagree’, no one reported ‘strongly disagree’ and 7.4%
did not report this question.
For the question “My coordinator encourages participation in different learning/development
opportunities”, 74.1% of the students reported ‘strongly agree’, 18.5% reported ‘agree’, no one reported
‘neutral’, ‘disagree’, or ‘strongly disagree’ and 7.4% did not answer this question.
Part III
Section II
Page 44 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
For the question, “My coordinator has a solid understanding of AUC student life values which are:
integrity, professionalism, inclusivity, student centeredness and social responsibility”, 66.7% of the
student reported ‘strongly agree’, 25.9% reported ‘agree’, no one reported ‘neutral’, ‘disagree’ or
‘strongly disagree' and 7.4% did not report this question.
Descriptive Analysis For
Part III Section II
Table 15
Strongly
Agree Agree Neutral Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Missing Data
Total
My coordinator encourages diverse perspectives (i.e. discussions in religion, political beliefs, culture, etc..)
19 6 - - - 2 27
70.4% 22.2% 0% 0% 0% 7.4% 100%
My coordinator encourages a two way dialogue with students.
15 10 - - - 2 27
55.6% 37.0% 0% 0% 0% 7.4% 100%
My coordinator encourages me to express my opinion freely even if I disagree with his/her opinion.
19 6 - - - 2 27
70.4% 22.2% 0% 0% 0% 7.4% 100%
My coordinator gives timely feedback/advice when needed.
17 7 - 1 - 2 27
63.0% 25.9% 0% 3.7% 0% 7.4% 100%
My coordinator creates a safe environment, where I can express myself.
17 7 1 - - 2 27
63.0% 25.9% 3.7% 0% 0% 7.4% 100%
My coordinator explains the reason behind decisions/actions, (i.e. selection process, semester abroad, etc..).
16 7 1 - - 3 27
59.3% 25.9% 3.7% 0% 0% 11.1% 100%
My coordinator offers guidance/constructive feedback for my personal and professional growth when needed.
17 6 1 1 - 2 27
63.0% 22.2% 3.7% 3.7% 0% 7.4% 100%
My coordinator encourages participation in different learning/development opportunities.
20 5 - - - 2 27
74.1% 18.5% 0% 0% 0% 7.4% 100%
My coordinator has a solid understanding of AUC student life values which are: integrity, professionalism, inclusivity, student centeredness and social responsibility.
18 7 - - - 2 27
66.7% 25.9% 0% 0% 0% 7.4% 100%
Page 45 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Figure 15
Page 46 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
[The cohort #] by the level of agreement regarding different statements (Q.4)] Table 16A
My coordinator has an understanding of
AUC's liberal education system.
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree
Cohort #
4 1 - 1
100% 0% 100%
9 2 1 3
66.7% 33.3% 100%
10 3 - 3
100% 0% 100%
11 6 2 8
75.0% 25.0% 100%
12 11 1 12
91.7% 8.3% 100%
Total 23 4 27
85.2% 14.8% 100%
Table 16B
Individual and group meetings with my coordinator are sufficient.
Total Strongly
Agree Agree Neutral Disagree
Cohort #
4 1 - - - 1
100% 0% 0% 0% 100%
9 - 2 1 - 3
0% 66.7% 33.3% 0% 100%
10 3 - - - 3
100% 0% 0% 0% 100%
11 3 4 - 1 8
37.5% 50.0% 0% 12.5% 100%
12 8 3 1 - 12
66.7% 25.0% 8.3% 0% 100%
Total 15 9 2 1 27
55.6% 33.3% 7.4% 3.7% 100%
Part III – Section III
Cross Tabulation Questions
Page 47 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Table 16C
My coordinator highlights the objectives of activities and link
them to LEAD'S overall outcomes and objectives. Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral
Cohort #
4 1 - - 1
100% 0% 0% 100%
9 - 2 1 3
0% 66.7% 33.3% 100%
10 3 - - 3
100% 0% 0% 100%
11 3 1 3 7
42.9% 14.3% 42.9% 100%
12 10 2 - 12
83.3% 16.7% 0% 100%
Total 17 5 4 26
65.4% 19.2% 15.4% 100%
Table 16D
My coordinator encourages
participatory planning and
implementation of activities.
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree
Cohort #
4 1 - 1
100% 0% 100%
9 1 2 3
33.3% 66.7% 100%
10 3 - 3
100% 0% 100%
11 2 6 8
25.0% 75.0% 100%
12 9 3 12
75.0% 25.0% 100%
Total 16 11 27
59.3% 40.7% 100%
Page 48 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Table 16E
My coordinator encourages commitment to
professionalism (e.g. meeting deadlines, arriving on time and
active class participation). Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral
Cohort #
4 1 - - 1
100% 0% 0% 100%
9 1 2 - 3
33.3% 66.7% 0% 100%
10 3 - - 3
100% 0% 0% 100%
11 2 3 3 8
25.0% 37.5% 37.5% 100%
12 12 - - 12
100% 0% 0% 100%
Total 19 5 3 27
70.4% 18.5% 11.1% 100%
Table 16F
My coordinator fosters team spirit and group work among
students. Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral
Cohort #
4 1 - - 1
100% 0% 0% 100%
9 - 3 - 3
0% 100% 0% 100%
10 3 - - 3
100% 0% 0% 100%
11 2 6 - 8
25.0% 75.0% 0% 100%
12 10 1 1 12
83.3% 8.3% 8.3% 100%
Total 16 10 1 27
59.3% 37.0% 3.7% 100%
Page 49 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Table 16G
My coordinator regularly asks for my feedback.
Total Strongly
Agree Agree Neutral Disagree
Cohort #
4 1 - - - 1
100% 0% 0% 0% 100%
9 1 1 - 1 3
33.3% 33.3% 0% 33.3% 100%
10 3 - - - 3
100% 0% 0% 0% 100%
11 2 - 5 1 8
25.0% 0% 62.5% 12.5% 100%
12 6 5 1 - 12
50.0% 41.7% 8.3% 0% 100%
Total 13 6 6 2 27
48.1% 22.2% 22.2% 7.4% 100%
Table 16H
My coordinator measures my learning though various assignment (e.g., post
training assignments, reflection forms and group projects). Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree
Cohort #
4 1 - - - 1
100% 0% 0% 0% 100%
9 - 1 2 - 3
0% 33.3% 66.7% 0% 100%
10 3 - - - 3
100% 0% 0% 0% 100%
11 2 4 1 1 8
25.0% 50.0% 12.5% 12.5% 100%
12 8 4 - - 12
66.7% 33.3% 0% 0% 100%
Total 14 9 3 1 27
51.9% 33.3% 11.1% 3.7% 100%
Page 50 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Table 16I
My coordinator encourages me to implement my leadership
and civic engagement activities in real life. Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral
Cohort #
4 1 - - 1
100% 0% 0% 100%
9 - 1 2 3
0% 33.3% 66.7% 100%
10 3 - - 3
100% 0% 0% 100%
11 2 5 1 8
25.0% 62.5% 12.5% 100%
12 12 - - 12
100% 0% 0% 100%
Total 18 6 3 27
66.7% 22.2% 11.1% 100%
Table 16J
My coordinator is challenging me to use my maximum potential.
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
Cohort #
4 1 - - - - 1
100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
9 - 1 1 - 1 3
0% 33.3% 33.3% 0% 33.3% 100%
10 3 - - - - 3
100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
11 3 1 3 1 - 8
37.5% 12.5% 37.5% 12.5% 0% 100%
12 7 3 1 1 - 12
58.3% 25.0% 8.3% 8.3% 0% 100%
Total 14 5 5 2 1 27
51.9% 18.5% 18.5% 7.4% 3.7% 100%
Page 51 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Table 16K
My coordinator monitors my academic progress and gives
support if needed. Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral
Cohort #
4 1 - - 1
100% 0% 0% 100%
9 - 1 2 3
0% 33.3% 66.7% 100%
10 3 - - 3
100% 0% 0% 100%
11 5 1 2 8
62.5% 12.5% 25.0% 100%
12 8 3 1 12
66.7% 25.0% 8.3% 100%
Total 17 5 5 27
63.0% 18.5% 18.5% 100%
Page 52 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Cross tabulation question [The cohort # by the level of agreement regarding other different statements (Q.5)]
Table 17A
My coordinator encourages diverse
perspectives (i.e. discussions in
religion, political beliefs, culture,
etc..)
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree
Cohort #
4 1 - 1
100% 0% 100%
9 2 1 3
66.7% 33.3% 100%
10 2 - 2
100% 0% 100%
11 4 4 8
50.0% 50.0% 100%
12 10 1 11
90.9% 9.1% 100%
Total 19 6 25
76.0% 24.0% 100%
Table 17B
My coordinator encourages a two way dialogue with
students. Total
Strongly Agree
Agree
Cohort #
4 1 - 1
100% 0% 100%
9 1 2 3
33.3% 66.7% 100%
10 2 - 2
100% 0% 100%
11 4 4 8
50.0% 50.0% 100%
12 7 4 11
63.6% 36.4% 100%
Total 15 10 25
60.0% 40.0% 100%
Page 53 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Table 17C
My coordinator encourages me to
express my opinion freely even if I disagree with
his/her opinion.
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree
Cohort #
4 1 - 1
100% 0% 100%
9 1 2 3
33.3% 66.7% 100%
10 2 - 2
100% 0% 100%
11 6 2 8
75.0% 25.0% 100%
12 9 2 11
81.8% 18.2% 100%
Total 19 6 25
76.0% 24.0% 100%
Table 17D
My coordinator gives timely feedback/advice when needed.
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Disagree
Cohort #
4 1 - - 1
100% 0% 0% 100%
9 1 1 1 3
33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 100%
10 2 - - 2
100% 0% 0% 100%
11 3 5 - 8
37.5% 62.5% 0% 100%
12 10 1 - 11
90.9% 9.1% 0% 100%
Total 17 7 1 25
68.0% 28.0% 4.0% 100%
Page 54 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Table 17E
My coordinator creates a safe environment, where I can
express myself. Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral
Cohort #
4 1 - - 1
100% 0% 0% 100%
9 1 1 1 3
33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 100%
10 2 - - 2
100% 0% 0% 100%
11 3 5 - 8
37.5% 62.5% 0% 100%
12 10 1 - 11
90.9% 9.1% 0% 100%
Total 17 7 1 25
68.0% 28.0% 4.0% 100%
Table 17F
My coordinator explains the reason behind
decisions/actions, (i.e. selection process, semester
abroad, etc..). Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral
Cohort #
4 1 - - 1
100% 0% 0% 100%
9 1 1 1 3
33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 100%
10 2 - - 2
100% 0% 0% 100%
11 3 5 - 8
37.5% 62.5% 0% 100%
12 9 1 - 10
90.0% 10.0% 0% 100%
Total 16 7 1 24
66.7% 29.2% 4.2% 100%
Page 55 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Table 17G
My coordinator offers guidance/constructive feedback for my personal and professional growth when
needed. Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree
Cohort #
4 1 - - - 1
100% 0% 0% 0% 100%
9 1 - 1 1 3
33.3% 0% 33.3% 33.3% 100%
10 2 - - - 2
100% 0% 0% 0% 100%
11 4 4 - - 8
50.0% 50.0% 0% 0% 100%
12 9 2 - - 11
81.8% 18.2% 0% 0% 100%
Total 17 6 1 1 25
68.0% 24.0% 4.0% 4.0% 100%
Table 17H
My coordinator encourages participation
in different learning/development
opportunities. Total
Strongly Agree
Agree
Cohort #
4 1 - 1
100% 0% 100%
9 3 - 3
100% 0% 100%
10 2 - 2
100% 0% 100%
11 4 4 8
50.0% 50.0% 100%
12 10 1 11
90.9% 9.1% 100%
Total 20 5 25
80.0% 20.0% 100%
Page 56 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Table 17I
My coordinator has a solid understanding of AUC
student life values which are: integrity,
professionalism, inclusivity, student centeredness and
social responsibility.
Total
Strongly Agree Agree
Cohort #
4 1 - 1
100% 0% 100%
9 1 2 3
33.3% 66.7% 100%
10 2 - 2
100% 0% 100%
11 4 4 8
50.0% 50.0% 100%
12 10 1 11
90.9% 9.1% 100%
Total 18 7 25
72.0% 28.0% 100%
Page 57 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Cross tabulation questions
[Gender by the level of agreement regarding different statements (Q.4)]
Table 18A
My coordinator has an understanding of
AUC's liberal education system.
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree
Gender
Male 9 - 9
100% 0% 100%
Female 14 4 18
77.8% 22.2% 100%
Total 23 4 27
85.2% 14.8% 100%
Table 18B
Individual and group meetings with my coordinator are sufficient.
Total Strongly
Agree Agree Neutral Disagree
Gender
Male 4 4 1 - 9
44.4% 44.4% 11.1% 0% 100%
Female 11 5 1 1 18
61.1% 27.8% 5.6% 5.6% 100%
Total 15 9 2 1 27
55.6% 33.3% 7.4% 3.7% 100%
Table 18C
My coordinator highlights the objectives of activities and link
them to LEAD'S overall outcomes and objectives.
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral
Gender
Male 5 3 1 9
55.6% 33.3% 11.1% 100%
Female 12 2 3 17
70.6% 11.8% 17.6% 100%
Total 17 5 4 26
65.4% 19.2% 15.4% 100%
Page 58 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Table 18D
My coordinator encourages
participatory planning and
implementation of activities.
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree
Gender
Male 6 3 9
66.7% 33.3% 100%
Female 10 8 18
55.6% 44.4% 100%
Total 16 11 27
59.3% 40.7% 100%
Table 18E
My coordinator encourages commitment to professionalism (e.g. meeting deadlines, arriving
on time and active class participation).
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral
Gender
Male 7 1 1 9
77.8% 11.1% 11.1% 100%
Female 12 4 2 18
66.7% 22.2% 11.1% 100%
Total 19 5 3 27
70.4% 18.5% 11.1% 100%
Table 18F
My coordinator fosters team spirit and group work among
students. Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral
Gender
Male 6 3 - 9
66.7% 33.3% 0% 100%
Female 10 7 1 18
55.6% 38.9% 5.6% 100%
Total 16 10 1 27
59.3% 37.0% 3.7% 100%
Page 59 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Table 18G
My coordinator regularly asks for my feedback.
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree
Gender
Male 3 4 2 - 9
33.3% 44.4% 22.2% 0% 100%
Female 10 2 4 2 18
55.6% 11.1% 22.2% 11.1% 100%
Total 13 6 6 2 27
48.1% 22.2% 22.2% 7.4% 100%
Table 18H
My coordinator measures my learning though various assignment (e.g., post
training assignments, reflection forms and group projects).
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree
Gender
Male 4 4 1 - 9
44.4% 44.4% 11.1% 0% 100%
Female 10 5 2 1 18
55.6% 27.8% 11.1% 5.6% 100%
Total 14 9 3 1 27
51.9% 33.3% 11.1% 3.7% 100%
Table 18I
My coordinator encourages me to implement my leadership
and civic engagement activities in real life.
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral
Gender
Male 7 - 2 9
77.8% 0% 22.2% 100%
Female 11 6 1 18
61.1% 33.3% 5.6% 100%
Total 18 6 3 27
66.7% 22.2% 11.1% 100%
Page 60 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Table 18J
My coordinator is challenging me to use my maximum potential.
Total Strongly
Agree Agree Neutral Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Gender
Male 4 2 3 - - 9
44.4% 22.2% 33.3% 0% 0% 100%
Female 10 3 2 2 1 18
55.6% 16.7% 11.1% 11.1% 5.6% 100%
Total 14 5 5 2 1 27
51.9% 18.5% 18.5% 7.4% 3.7% 100%
Table 18K
My coordinator monitors my academic progress and gives
support if needed. Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral
Gender
Male 5 3 1 9
55.6% 33.3% 11.1% 100%
Female 12 2 4 18
66.7% 11.1% 22.2% 100%
Total 17 5 5 27
63.0% 18.5% 18.5% 100%
Page 61 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Cross tabulation question [Gender by the level of agreement regarding other different statements (Q.5)]
Table 19A
My coordinator encourages diverse
perspectives (i.e. discussions in religion,
political beliefs, culture, etc..)
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree
Gender
Male 7 1 8
87.5% 12.5% 100%
Female 12 5 17
70.6% 29.4% 100%
Total 19 6 25
76.0% 24.0% 100%
Table 19B
My coordinator encourages a two way
dialogue with students. Total
Strongly Agree
Agree
Gender
Male 3 5 8
37.5% 62.5% 100%
Female 12 5 17
70.6% 29.4% 100%
Total 15 10 25
60.0% 40.0% 100%
Table 19C
My coordinator encourages me to
express my opinion freely even if I disagree with his/her opinion.
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree
Gender
Male 6 2 8
75.0% 25.0% 100%
Female 13 4 17
76.5% 23.5% 100%
Total 19 6 25
76.0% 24.0% 100%
Page 62 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Table 19D
My coordinator gives timely feedback/advice when needed.
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Disagree
Gender
Male 5 3 - 8
62.5% 37.5% 0% 100%
Female 12 4 1 17
70.6% 23.5% 5.9% 100%
Total 17 7 1 25
68.0% 28.0% 4.0% 100%
Table 19E
My coordinator creates a safe environment, where I can
express myself. Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral
Gender
Male 5 2 1 8
62.5% 25.0% 12.5% 100%
Female 12 5 - 17
70.6% 29.4% 0% 100%
Total 17 7 1 25
68.0% 28.0% 4.0% 100%
Table 19F
My coordinator explains the reason behind
decisions/actions, (i.e. selection process, semester abroad,
etc..).
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral
Gender
Male 6 2 - 8
75.0% 25.0% 0% 100%
Female 10 5 1 16
62.5% 31.3% 6.3% 100%
Total 16 7 1 24
66.7% 29.2% 4.2% 100%
Page 63 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Table 19G
My coordinator offers guidance/constructive feedback for my personal and professional growth when
needed. Total
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree
Gender
Male 4 3 1 - 8
50.0% 37.5% 12.5% 0% 100%
Female 13 3 - 1 17
76.5% 17.6% 0% 5.9% 100%
Total 17 6 1 1 25
68.0% 24.0% 4.0% 4.0% 100%
Table 19H
My coordinator encourages
participation in different
learning/development opportunities.
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree
Gender
Male 6 2 8
75.0% 25.0% 100%
Female 14 3 17
82.4% 17.6% 100%
Total 20 5 25
80.0% 20.0% 100%
Table 19I
My coordinator has a solid understanding of AUC student life values
which are: integrity, professionalism,
inclusivity, student centeredness and social
responsibility.
Total
Strongly Agree
Agree
Gender
Male 5 3 8
62.5% 37.5% 100%
Female 13 4 17
76.5% 23.5% 100%
Total 18 7 25
72.0% 28.0% 100%
Page 64 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Cohort #” by the question “Does the coordinator try his/her best to treat all students with equality?”
Table 20
Does the coordinator try his/her best to
treat all students with equality?
Total
Yes No
Cohort #
4 1 - 1
100% 0% 100%
9 2 1 3
66.7% 33.3% 100%
10 2 - 2
100% 0% 100%
11 8 - 8
100% 0% 100%
12 11 - 11
100% 0% 100%
Total 24 1 25
96.0% 4.0% 100%
“Gender” by the question “Does the coordinator try his/her best to treat all students with equality?”
Table 21
Does the coordinator try
his/her best to treat all students with
equality?
Total
Yes No
Gender
Male 8 - 8
100% 0% 100%
Female 16 1 17
94.1% 5.9% 100%
Total 24 1 25
96.0% 4.0% 100%
Page 65 The Office of Institutional Research/AUC
Please suggest any areas for improvement:
1. My coordinator is perfect
2. Group organization needs to be more explained and taken seriously by the MAPI's
3. She is perfect the way she is.
4. The separation between MEPI and LEAD offices because I believe it's about time MEPI develops
its own system.
Please feel free to add any other comments:
There were no any students’ comments.
Part III Section IV
MEPI General Comments