![Page 1: Sociolinguistics October 27, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032722/56649ce65503460f949b44ff/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Sociolinguistics
October 27, 2008
![Page 2: Sociolinguistics October 27, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032722/56649ce65503460f949b44ff/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Sociolinguistics: Methods
1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period
of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys and questionnaires 5. Accent Judgment Test 6. Language attitude studies 7. Role-playing 8. Discourse Completion Tests
![Page 3: Sociolinguistics October 27, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032722/56649ce65503460f949b44ff/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
1. Observations, interviews
Pronunciation of /r/ in Labov’s New York City Study:
![Page 4: Sociolinguistics October 27, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032722/56649ce65503460f949b44ff/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Ex 1: Labov: /r/ in New York City
the absence or presence of consonantal /r/ in postvocalic position
reason for that type of pronunciation.
Hypothesis: --There is a certain social
significance in the way of producing this sound, that there is a distinct difference in the social environment of the people with or without deletion of postvocalic /r/.
![Page 5: Sociolinguistics October 27, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032722/56649ce65503460f949b44ff/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Labov did his research in three New York stores.
Three stores: Saks 5th Avenue (upper middle class) Macy’s (lower middle class) S. Klein (working class)
informants---employees
![Page 6: Sociolinguistics October 27, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032722/56649ce65503460f949b44ff/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
To get comparable results Labov asked for a department on the fourth flour.
“Fourth floor.” “Excuse me?”
a more careful pronunciation of “Fourth floor” transcription of the pronounciation of /r/ in ``fourth'' and
``floor'' both in the first response and in the careful pronunciation
![Page 7: Sociolinguistics October 27, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032722/56649ce65503460f949b44ff/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Results of the New York City interviewsOverall Distribution of /r/ in Labov's Department Store Study,
NYC
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Saks' Macy's Klein
Department Store
variable /r/
100% /r/
![Page 8: Sociolinguistics October 27, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032722/56649ce65503460f949b44ff/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
% /r/ per repetition
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
fourth floor FOURTH FLOOR
Saks'
Macy's
Klein
![Page 9: Sociolinguistics October 27, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032722/56649ce65503460f949b44ff/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
1. Observations
The preferred dialect of pop music (social situation)
Trudgill Peter. 1983. ‘Acts of Conflicting Identity. The Sociolingistics of British Pop-Song Pronunciation’.
In 1960s British pop songs were usually sung with what was perceived as an American accent:
- flap for intervocalic /t/- /æ/ instead of /a:/ in dance, last, half, can’t etc. - rhotic /r/- [a:] instead of diphthongs for /life/, /my/ etc. - words like love with a long schwa- body, top etc.. with unrounded vowel. (No single British variety has all these features, although all can be found
somewhere in Britain.)
![Page 10: Sociolinguistics October 27, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032722/56649ce65503460f949b44ff/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Historical analysis:
The percentage of potential postvocal /r/s actually realized was 36% in 1950-60, and 4% in late 1970s (?).
Same pattern for /t/ and /æ/ instead of /a:/ (can’t, half)… except for Mick Jagger, who always uses /æ/.
Why? Because the need to imitate became
weaker: Britain dominated the field from the mid 1960s.
![Page 11: Sociolinguistics October 27, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032722/56649ce65503460f949b44ff/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
3. Interviews
-g dropping Trudgill (1983)
UMC LMC UWC LWC
Men 6.3 32.4 40.0 90.1
Women 0.0 1.4 35.6 58.9
![Page 12: Sociolinguistics October 27, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032722/56649ce65503460f949b44ff/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
5. Accent Judgment Tests
In these tasks, listeners hear speakers of different dialects and attempt to determine whether or not the speaker is or is not from a certain location.
![Page 13: Sociolinguistics October 27, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032722/56649ce65503460f949b44ff/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
5. Accent Judgment Tasks
Study: Perceptions of Utah English
In this study, listeners were asked to determine whether or not a speaker was from Utah
![Page 14: Sociolinguistics October 27, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032722/56649ce65503460f949b44ff/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
What do these signs have in common?
Utahisms!
![Page 15: Sociolinguistics October 27, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032722/56649ce65503460f949b44ff/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
5. Accent Judgment Tests
Research Questions:part 1: dialect recognition1. can native English speakers recognize the
difference between two very similar varieties of English?
2. what factors influence this ability (linguistic, listener, speaker characteristics)?
part 2: dialect prejudice3. for stigmatized varieties, can/do listeners
distinguish between non-standard features and dialect specific features?
![Page 16: Sociolinguistics October 27, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032722/56649ce65503460f949b44ff/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
method
participants: Adult American English Speakers (n=63)
demographics: online test
judging:
scale from 0 (no Utah accent) to 6 (strong Utah accent)
![Page 17: Sociolinguistics October 27, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032722/56649ce65503460f949b44ff/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Linguistic items noted as part of variety
phonological items lexical1. fail/fell merger2. cord/card merger3. bowl/bull merger4. intrusive ‘t’ (else as
eltse)5. glottal stop
(mountain as moun’ an)
6. intrusive glottal stop (conference as con?ference)
7. singing as singkingk8. pronounced ‘l’ (in
words like folk)
1. lurpy 2. sluff3. ignert4. oh my heck!
(interesting expletives)
syntactic1. propredicate do2. time + that3. up to the store4. we was5. might could
![Page 18: Sociolinguistics October 27, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032722/56649ce65503460f949b44ff/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
stimuli: part 1
12 speakers, 6 from Utah, 6 from other Western states differed in age (20, 40, or 60 years old) and gender read paragraph full of Utahisms
Man, tests really stress me out. I think they’re giving me ulcers. My mom says the calcium in warm milk really helps, but I think she’s full of it. Sometimes I just feel rotten like there’s no pleasure in life.
a. b. c.
![Page 19: Sociolinguistics October 27, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032722/56649ce65503460f949b44ff/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
stimuli: part 1
12 speakers, 6 from Utah, 6 from other Western states differed in age (20, 40, or 60 years old) and gender read paragraph full of pronunciations of Utahisms
Man, tests really stress me out. I think they’re giving me ultcers. My mom says the caltcium in warm melk really helps, but I think she’s foll of it. Sometimes I just fill ro??en like there’s no playzure in life.
![Page 20: Sociolinguistics October 27, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032722/56649ce65503460f949b44ff/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
research question 1
can native English speakers recognize the difference between Utah and non-Utah speakers?
![Page 21: Sociolinguistics October 27, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032722/56649ce65503460f949b44ff/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Utah vs. non Utah
0
1
2
3
4
5
Utah Non Utah
3.39
2.72
p<.0001
*
YES!
![Page 22: Sociolinguistics October 27, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032722/56649ce65503460f949b44ff/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
research question 1 (cont.)
are native speakers of the variety (Utah speakers) better at recognizing their variety than are non speakers (Westerners and Non-Westerners)?
are the aspects used to recognize speakers of Utah English the same for participants regardless of their native variety of English (Utahans, Westerners, Others)
![Page 23: Sociolinguistics October 27, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032722/56649ce65503460f949b44ff/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
place of origin and dialect recognition
0
1
2
3
4
5
Utahns Westerners Other
Utahns Non Utahns
*
Non-Westerners, people from places other than Utah and the West could not recognize the Utah from non-Utah speakers
p<.05
kind of . . .
*
![Page 24: Sociolinguistics October 27, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032722/56649ce65503460f949b44ff/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
research question 2 what factors influence dialect recognition?
linguistic factors phonological aspects that differ from other
surrounding varieties speaker demographic factors
age gender
![Page 25: Sociolinguistics October 27, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032722/56649ce65503460f949b44ff/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
1. fail/fell merger2. deal/dill merger3. pool/pole merger4. cord/card merger5. bowl/bull merger6. intrusive ‘t’ (else as eltse)7. glottal stop (mountain as moun’ an)8. intrusive glottal stop (conference as con?
ference)9. singing as singkingk10. pronounced ‘l’ (in words like folk)11. Sunday as Sundee
1. linguistic factors
![Page 26: Sociolinguistics October 27, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032722/56649ce65503460f949b44ff/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
1. fail/fell merger2. deal/dill merger3. pool/pole merger4. cord/card merger5. bowl/bull merger6. intrusive ‘t’ (else as eltse)7. glottal stop (mountain as moun’ an)8. intrusive glottal stop (conference as con?
ference)9. singing as singkingk10. pronounced ‘l’ (in words like folk)11. Sunday as Sundee
1. linguistic factors
combined: r2 = .98
![Page 27: Sociolinguistics October 27, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032722/56649ce65503460f949b44ff/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
linguistic factors
are the aspects used to recognize speakers of Utah English the same for participants regardless of their native variety of English (Utahans, Westerners, Others)
![Page 28: Sociolinguistics October 27, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032722/56649ce65503460f949b44ff/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
linguistic factors
Utahans Westerners Others
fail/fell r = .78 fail/fell r = .59intrusive /t/ r = .94folk with /l/ r = .96
fail/fell r = .78deal/dill r = .84
Yes!
![Page 29: Sociolinguistics October 27, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032722/56649ce65503460f949b44ff/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
2. demographic factors: speakers specific features examined:
age gender
![Page 30: Sociolinguistics October 27, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032722/56649ce65503460f949b44ff/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
speaker’s age
0
1
2
3
4
5
20 year olds 40 year olds 60 year olds
2.7
3.9
*p<.001
3.5
*
![Page 31: Sociolinguistics October 27, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032722/56649ce65503460f949b44ff/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
speaker’s gender
0
1
2
3
4
5
Male Female
3.94
3.16
*p<.001
*
![Page 32: Sociolinguistics October 27, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032722/56649ce65503460f949b44ff/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
part 2: research question 3
can/do listeners distinguish between non-standard features and dialect specific features?
![Page 33: Sociolinguistics October 27, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032722/56649ce65503460f949b44ff/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
part 2: stimuli
4 female speakers (average age: 22) none of speakers were from Utah read sentences with typical lexical and
syntactic characteristics of either Utah English or non-standard American English
![Page 34: Sociolinguistics October 27, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032722/56649ce65503460f949b44ff/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
part 2: procedure
judged whether the speaker was or was not from Utah on same 6 point Likert scale
typical Utah: And oh my heck! You can’t believe
how many people were trying to get through it at the same time.
Well, it’s been at least a year that we haven’t talked to each other.
typical non-standard: She just said that I might could be on
the team.
I told her we was going to the game.
![Page 35: Sociolinguistics October 27, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032722/56649ce65503460f949b44ff/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
typical characteristics of Utah and non-standard American EnglishUtahisms ‘boughten’ ‘sluff’ ‘my heck’ ‘reservoir’ ‘for cute’ propredicate do
(‘I used to do’) time that compass directions ‘moisture’ ‘tend’ for babysitting ‘frontage road’
Non Standard Features focuser/quotative ‘like’ ‘you bet’ ‘might could’ ‘pop’ positive ‘anymore’ ‘there’s’ comparative ‘way’ ‘come with’ ‘what’s that?’ ‘ain’t’ double negatives ‘we was’
![Page 36: Sociolinguistics October 27, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032722/56649ce65503460f949b44ff/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
typical characteristics of Utah and non-standard American EnglishUtahisms ‘boughten’ ‘sluff’ ‘my heck’ ‘reservoir’ ‘for cute’ propredicate do
(‘I used to do’) time that compass directions ‘moisture’ ‘tend’ ‘frontage road’
Non Standard Features focuser/quotative ‘like’ ‘you bet’ ‘might could’ ‘pop’ positive ‘anymore’ ‘there’s’ comparative ‘way’ ‘come with’ ‘what’s that?’ ‘ain’t’ double negatives ‘we was’
![Page 37: Sociolinguistics October 27, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032722/56649ce65503460f949b44ff/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
non-standard items vs. Utah items do listeners identify the same non-standard
items as properties of Utah English regardless of their native variety of English (Utahans, Westerners, Others)?
![Page 38: Sociolinguistics October 27, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032722/56649ce65503460f949b44ff/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
non-standard items vs. Utah items
All Utahan Western Other
my heck reservoir my heck my heck
won them my heck won them for cute
for cute pop pop pop
pop tend sluff won them
boughten sluff might could sluff
reservoir you’re ok boughten quotative like
tend for cute for cute boughten
![Page 39: Sociolinguistics October 27, 2008. Sociolinguistics: Methods 1. Observation 2. Observation of a small group over a period of time 3. Interview 4. Surveys](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032722/56649ce65503460f949b44ff/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
non-standard items vs. Utah items
All Utahan Western Other
my heck reservoir my heck my heck
won them my heck won them for cute
for cute pop pop pop
pop tend sluff won them
boughten sluff might could sluff
reservoir you’re ok boughten quotative like
tend for cute for cute boughten