Simulating Two-way Interactive Simulating Two-way Interactive Vegetation-Biophysical Processes and Vegetation-Biophysical Processes and Atmospheric-Mesoscale Circulations Atmospheric-Mesoscale Circulations
During 2001 Santarem Field Campaign During 2001 Santarem Field Campaign Using SiB-RAMS ModelUsing SiB-RAMS Model
Lixin Lu1,2, Scott Denning1, Ian Baker1, Marek Uliasz1
1 Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University,
Fort Collins, CO; and 2 ATOC/CIRES, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO
Collaborators: Marcos Longo, Maria A. da Silva-Dias, Pedro da Silva-Dias, Saulo Freitas
Tropical plays an important role in global carbon budget
Flux towers in “end-member” ecosystems (intact forest, selective logging, pasture site) measure local fluxes and help understand processes controlling them
Models can be tested against flux towers, and extrapolated to regional scales using remote sensing and other spatial data products
Regional up scaling and inverse modeling need to consider the unique “tower meteorology”
Amazon Carbon Balance
Objectives
Our numerical experiments aim to:
Evaluate SiBRAMS simulated surface fluxes against eddy flux tower observations.
Understand the mesoscale circulation patterns in Satarem region, and how they affect the regional carbon balance.
Investigate the potential impact of river CO2 effluxes on regional carbon balance.
Numerical Experiment Design MODEL: SiBRAMS,
Prognostic vegetation CO2 fluxes
3-D CO2 transport; Freitas (2000)
CONTROL EXPERIMENT:
No river water CO2 effluxes;
Sfc water CO2 flux = 5 μ mol m-2 s-1
MODELED PERIOD:
START: Aug 1, 2001
STOP: Aug 15, 2001
BOUNDARY FORCING:
CPTEC Analysis
GRID MESH: 4-level nested grids
Coarsest: 100 km
Finest: 1 km
1
2
3
4
Topography and Vegetation Distribution
August 2001 Synoptic Situation
Horizontal wind at 500 mb
August 2001 Synoptic Situation
Observed accumulated precipitation 1 through 15 August 2001 from automatic weather stations located in western Para
Equivalent potential temperature from CPTEC analysis, at longitudi-nal cross section of 54.375W, and 700 mb level. The line corresponds to Santarem region.
3-4 days easterly wave oscillation
Runs Broadly Agree With Observations
Runs Broadly Agree With Observations
Runs Broadly Agree With Observations
Runs Broadly Agree With Observations
363
366
369
372
375
378
381
384
387
0 3600 7200
time (s)
CO2 concentration measured by a continuous analyzer flown at 300 m elevation over the Amazon River (blue) and adjacent forest (green) on the morning of August 13. Two legs of over 100 km each were flown, one over the forest, and the other over the River.
Concentrations over the river were elevated by more than 10 ppm.
Turbulent variations of [CO2] were much greater over the forest.
River Forest
Aircraft Measured CO2 at 300 m
Time
Differences in Domain-averaged [CO2]
Strong diurnal cycle relate to CO2 uptake at the sfc and PBL meteorology
More impact during night
Strong PBL mixing during the day reduce the signal of the river CO2 efflux
Accumulation during night eludes tower observation due to calm condition and drainage flow
[CO2] Distribution Averaged Over Entire Simulation
With River CO2 Effluxes Without Differences
Increase Northwest-Southeast [CO2] gradient More of impact downwind (lee of the river) Drainage flows facilitate the accumulation of [CO2] at lowlands River CO2 efflux altered [CO2] distribution pattern
Domain-averaged, Vegetated Sfc CO2 Flux
Strong diurnal cycle relate
to CO2 uptake at the sfc
More impact during day when photosynthetic uptake in progress
Increased regional vegetation uptake of carbon.
Net effect of river CO2 effluxes on regional carbon balance increase carbon source.
Amazon continue to be a carbon sink after the river CO2 effluxes are accounted for.
River CO2 Efflux on Regional Carbon Budget
Area: River=27.1024%; Land=72.8967%
River CO2 effluxes = 5 umol/m2/s
Vegetated SFC:With River CO2 effluxes: -2.19287 umol/m2/sWithout River CO2 effluxes: -2.12198 umol/m2/s
Land and water: With River CO2 effluxes: -0.8378 umol/m2/sWithout River CO2 effluxes: -2.12198 umol/m2/s
Low-Level Convergence (LLC)
Low-level cumulus clouds appear persistently in the study area, and seem to favor the east bank of Tapajos River.
This cloud band is frequently observed both locally and in satellite imagery.
Previous research has stressed the role of the thermally driven “river breeze” effect (Silva Dias et al, 2003).
The asymmetry and persistence of LLC under strong trade wind conditions suggests that
other mechanisms may be involved
LLC Also Appear on GOES Imagery
Simulated Low-Level Convergence
8/1/2001, 10AM 8/3/2001, Noon 8/6/2001, 6 PM
Elevated topography block the easterly trade Sfc roughness length differences between water and land Channel the wind from Amazon to Tapajos River—northerly flow Slow down of sfc wind – convergence
Possible Mechanisms
Why is the low-level cumulus cloud often better organized on the east bank of the
Tapajos River? Wind Vector
Tapajos River
Amazon River
Elevated Topography
Wind Vector
Tap
ajos
Riv
er
These mechanically forced updrafts lead to increased cumulus clouds and sometimes precipitation.
Tower Observations Confirm Cloud Passing
Mid-day NEE dip frequently observed
Nearly constant Bowen ratio
at mid-day indicates cloud effects rather than water stress
The timing of simulated maximum surface convergences relate to the mid-day cloud passing
Observed net radiation from an nearby met station confirms the existence of midday cloudiness
Lagrangian Particle Model Coupled With SiB-RAMS
Transect of ten 60-m towers every 4 km
X = 143, 147, …, 171, 179 km, Y = -62 km
Virtual tower #8 corresponds to KM67 location
18,000 particles/hour at each tower, tracked backward in time; influence function was calculated for hourly concentration sampling at each tower
Time series of [CO2] coming to each tower from sfc fluxes (veg. photosynthesis and respiration, river CO2 efflux) within radius of 100-km
24 hour composite from 13 days Red line / Yellow - [CO2] at a tower Blue - fraction of [CO2] coming from water
X=143kmY=-62km
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24
time of day [hours]
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
CO2 [ppm]
Contribution of [CO2] Sources
X=147kmY=-62km
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24
time of day [hours]
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
CO2 [ppm]
Contribution of [CO2] Sources
X=151kmY=-62km
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24
time of day [hours]
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
CO2 [ppm]
Contribution of [CO2] Sources
X=155kmY=-62km
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24
time of day [hours]
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
CO2 [ppm]
Contribution of [CO2] Sources
X=159kmY=-62km
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24
time of day [hours]
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
CO2 [ppm]
Contribution of [CO2] Sources
X=163kmY=-62km
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24
time of day [hours]
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
CO2 [ppm]
Contribution of [CO2] Sources
X=167kmY=-62km
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24
time of day [hours]
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
CO2 [ppm]
Contribution of [CO2] Sources
X=171kmY=-62km
Location: Km 67Yellow: vegetation;
Blue: water CO2 efflux
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24
time of day [hours]
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
CO2 [ppm]
Contribution of [CO2] Sources
X=175kmY=-62km
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24
time of day [hours]
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
CO2 [ppm]
Contribution of [CO2] Sources
X=179kmY=-62km
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24
time of day [hours]
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
CO2 [ppm]
Contribution of [CO2] Sources
120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190x [km]
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1 river CO2 / land CO2
Relative Contribution in Tower Observed CO2
120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190x [km]
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
river CO2 / total CO2
Relative Contribution in Tower Observed CO2
120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190x [km]
0
1
2
3
land CO2 / total CO2
Relative Contribution in Tower Observed CO2
Summary and Conclusion Mesoscale simulation of the SMC reproduces many aspects of the
observed fluxes and [CO2] Topographic distribution, landscape feature, and heterogeneous
vegetation produce easily detectable spatial structure in simulated CO2 River CO2 efflux enhance vegetation carbon uptake, and modifies
regional carbon budget River CO2 efflux modifies [CO2] concentration distribution, especially
at night Low-level convergence is simulated on many days along the east bank
of the Tapajos River during strong, steady Trade Winds Cumulus clouds associated with this convergence line are frequently
observed by satellite imagery, and flux measurements often indicate reduced NEE due to resulting cloud shading
The mechanical forcings are likely the dominant factors to form LLC, while thermal forcing can be secondary during steady trade winds
Particle model can be used to quantify different sources of [CO2], and their contribution to tower-observed [CO2]
Flux tower data interpretation must consider LLC effects
Publications in Progress
Mesoscale circulations and atmospheric CO2 variations in the Tapajos Region, Para, Brazil. JGR-Atmosphere, 110, D21102, doi: 10.1029/2004JD005757.
Lu, L., et al. 2008: Simulating the two-way interactions between vegetation biophysical processes and mesoscale circulations during 2001 Santarem field campaign. JGR. To be submitted.
The potential influence of river CO2 efflux on regional carbon balance in the Tapajos region, Para, Brazil. GRL. In preparation.
Why the low-level cumulus clouds are often better organized on the east-side of Tapajos River – A mechanistic study. JAS. In Preparation.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge NASA LBA-Ecology Grant, NCC5-707, for support of our research.
We thank Prof. Steven Wofsy, for his support of using KM 67 tower data for our analysis.
Additional Figures
NDVI distribution