1 © 2017 TMIT
May 18, 2017 Webinar Month 102
For resource downloads go to: www.safetyleaders.org
Sepsis: The Basics Part 1
Pragmatic Sepsis Care For Providers:
2 © 2017 TMIT
Charles Denham, MD Chairman, TMIT TMIT High Performer Webinar May 18, 2017
Welcome
3 © 2017 TMIT
With regard to webinar sound volume, please check: o WebEx volume o Computer volume o External speaker volume
With regard to webinar sound volume, please check: o WebEx volume o Computer volume
With regard to webinar sound volume, please check: o WebEx volume
4 © 2017 TMIT
If you are still having difficulty hearing the webinar: Please click on Participants
If you are still having difficulty hearing the webinar: Please click on Participants
Then the “Request Phone”
button to receive a toll dial-in
5
6 © 2017 TMIT
If you wish to follow us on Twitter, go to: http://twitter.com/TMIT1 or use #safetyleaders hashtag
Also, go to: www.facebook.com/SafetyLeaders
and related sites
7 © 2017 TMIT
TMIT Purpose Statement Our Purpose: We will measure our success by how we protect and enrich the lives of families…patients AND caregivers. Our Mission: To accelerate performance solutions that save lives, save money, and create value in the communities we serve and ventures we undertake.
8 © 2017 TMIT
Disclosure Statement The following panelists certify: that unless otherwise noted below, each presenter provided full disclosure information; does not intend to discuss an unapproved/investigative use of a commercial product/device; and has no significant financial relationship(s) to disclose. If unapproved uses of products are discussed, presenters are expected to disclose this to participants. None of the participants have any relationship medication or device companies discussed in their presentations.
Jeanne M. Huddleston, MD, FACP, FHM, is a past President of the Society of Hospital Medicine, the founder of Hospital Medicine and past Program Director of the Hospital Medicine Fellowship at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. She is Chairperson of Mayo Clinic's Mortality Review Subcommittee, a multi-disciplinary group of providers that review every death in search of where the health care delivery system may have failed the providers and/or the patient. She has nothing to disclose. Ryan Arnold, MD, is an emergency medicine physician at Christiana Care Health System and is the Director of Research, participating in over 60 different research projects. He has nothing to disclose. Charles Denham, MD, is the Chairman of TMIT; a former TMIT education grantee of CareFusion and AORN with co-production by Discovery Channel for Chasing Zero documentary and Toolbox including models; and an education grantee of GE with co-production by Discovery Channel for Surfing the Healthcare Tsunami documentary and Toolbox, including models. HCC is a former contractor for GE and CareFusion, and a former contractor with Siemens and Nanosonics, which produces a sterilization device, Trophon. HCC is a former contractor with Senior Care Centers. HCC is a former contractor for ByoPlanet, a producer of sanitation devices for multiple industries. He does not currently work with any pharmaceutical or device company. His current area of research is in threat management to institutions and continuing professional education and consumer education. Dr. Denham is a collaborator with Professor Christensen.
9 © 2017 TMIT
Speakers and Reactors
Jeanne Huddleston Ryan Arnold, MD Charles Denham MD
10 © 2017 TMIT
Charles Denham, MD Chairman, TMIT TMIT High Performer Webinar May 18, 2017
In the News and National Survey Highlights: News Update and
March 2017 Webinar National Survey
© 2006 HCC, Inc. CD000000-0000XX 11 © 2017 TMIT
In The News …
Source: Propublica May 12, 2017
May 12, 2017
© 2006 HCC, Inc. CD000000-0000XX 12 © 2017 TMIT
In The News …
Among the 2855 patients who were 30-day survivors of an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest during the period from 2001 through 2012, a total of 10.5% had brain damage or were admitted to a nursing home and 9.7% died during the 1-year follow-up period. During the study period, among the 2084 patients who had cardiac arrests that were not witnessed by emergency medical services (EMS) personnel, the rate of bystander CPR increased from 66.7% to 80.6% (P<0.001), the rate of bystander defibrillation increased from 2.1% to 16.8% (P<0.001), the rate of brain damage or nursing home admission decreased from 10.0% to 7.6% (P<0.001), and all-cause mortality decreased from 18.0% to 7.9% (P = 0.002). In adjusted analyses, bystander CPR was associated with a risk of brain damage or nursing home admission that was significantly lower than that associated with no bystander resuscitation (hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47 to 0.82), as well as a lower risk of death from any cause (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.99) and a lower risk of the composite end point of brain damage, nursing home admission, or death (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.84). The risks of these outcomes were even lower among patients who received bystander defibrillation as compared with no bystander resuscitation… In our study, we found that bystander CPR and defibrillation were associated with risks of brain damage or nursing home admission and of death from any cause that were significantly lower than those associated with no bystander resuscitation. (Funded by TrygFonden and the Danish Heart Foundation.)
Source: Kragholm K., Wissenberg, M., et al. Bystander Efforts and 1-Year Outcomes in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. The NEJM. 2017 May 4.
May 4, 2017
Bystander Efforts And 1-year Outcomes In Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest
© 2006 HCC, Inc. CD000000-0000XX 13 © 2017 TMIT
In The News …
According to numerous open-source reports, a widespread ransomware campaign is affecting various organizations with reports of tens of thousands of infections in as many as 150 countries, including the United States, United Kingdom, Spain, Russia, Taiwan, France, and Japan. The software can run in as many as 27 different languages. The latest version of this ransomware variant, known as WannaCry, WCry, or Wanna Decryptor, was discovered the morning of May 12, 2017, by an independent security researcher and has spread rapidly over several hours, with initial reports beginning around 4:00 AM EDT, May 12, 2017. Open-source reporting indicates a requested ransom of .1781 bitcoins, roughly $300 U.S.
Source: FBI Flash: Indicators associated with WannaCry ransomware. FBI and DHS. 2017 May 13.
May 13, 2017
FBI Flash: indicators associated with WannaCry Ransomware
© 2006 HCC, Inc. CD000000-0000XX 14 © 2017 TMIT
In The News …
The 2017 Identity Fraud Study, released by Javelin Strategy & Research, found that $16 billion was stolen from 15.4 million U.S. consumers in 2016, compared with $15.3 billion and 13.1 million victims a year earlier. In the past six years identity thieves have stolen over $107 billion. Following the introduction of microchip equipped credit cards in 2015 in the United States, which make the cards difficult to counterfeit, criminals focused on new account fraud. New account fraud occurs when a thief opens a credit card or other financial account using a victim’s name and other stolen personal information … Medical/healthcare organizations were affected by 377 breaches (34.5 percent of total breaches).
Source: Source for Javelin 2017 Report: Identity Theft Research Center Report and website. Available at: http://www.iii.org/fact-statistic/identity-theft-and-cybercrime
2017
Identity Theft and Cybercrime
15 © 2016 TMIT
I am interested in MORE DETAIL ON FAILURE TO RESCUE.
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
15%
Very Strongly
Agree
10
Strongly Agree
9
Agree
8
Agree
7
Very Strongly Disagree
1
Disagree
3
Strongly Disagree
2
Neutral
6
Neutral
5
Negative to Neutral
4
99% Agreed and 76% Strongly or Very Strongly Agreed, and 59% Very Strongly Agreed
59%
17%
1%
Source: TMIT High Performer Webinar Series; 2017 Threats & Safety Failure to Rescue: Bedside Patient Rescue A Great Opportunity – April 20, 2017
Anonymous Survey Questions
8%
16 © 2016 TMIT
• Best players on the team! • Bowel obstructions • Building efficiency in nursing staffing and work patterns to
obtain data that feed "nurse worry" • Clinical alarm fatigue • Device integration to aide in real time documentation for
improved decision support using a ews model • Discussion of most common failure points • Early identification of sepsis • Geriatric patients • How to implement in a smaller facility • How to manage in smaller, rural hospitals • How to use a portion of this research in a small community
hospital (no residents) where nursing has to escalate because there is no "real time" supervising MD
• Implementation of an EWS in a smaller hospital • More detail on these types of EWS • More details on triage • More on sepsis Nursing intuition on patient care • Outcome measurements of RRT performance • Sepsis - qsofa • Slow bleeds
• What are best effective recognition activities when an early warning system is not in place
• What is the next step to utilized this information • What type of training do nurses receive on MEWS and other
early warning systems? • Worry factor scoring
FAILURE TO RESCUE topics I would like to be FURTHER covered include:
Source: TMIT High Performer Webinar Series; 2017 Threats & Safety Failure to Rescue: Bedside Patient Rescue A Great Opportunity – April 20, 2017
17 © 2016 TMIT
I am interested in FAILURE TO RESCUE performance improvement topics.
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10% 7%
Very Strongly
Agree
10
Strongly Agree
9
Agree
8
Agree
7
Very Strongly Disagree
1
Disagree
3
Strongly Disagree
2
Neutral
6
Neutral
5
Negative to Neutral
4
100% Agreed and 89% Strongly or Very Strongly Agreed, and 73% Very Strongly Agreed
73%
16%
Source: TMIT High Performer Webinar Series; 2017 Threats & Safety Failure to Rescue: Bedside Patient Rescue A Great Opportunity – April 20, 2017
Anonymous Survey Questions
4%
18 © 2016 TMIT
• Change management and nursing involvement • How to implement in a smaller facility • Process breakdown detection • Real time documentation entry to improve accuracy of the
scores • Building inter professional communication pathways to improve
responsiveness to alerts • Same • Training the nurse of <1 year to increase perception of patient
deterioration • More detail about evidence based computerized early warning
tools and alerting,; what elements are important; and other opportunities to address other common failures
• How does the RRT integrate into the alert system described
FAILURE TO RESCUE topics I would like to be covered first include:
Source: TMIT High Performer Webinar Series; 2017 Threats & Safety Failure to Rescue: Bedside Patient Rescue A Great Opportunity – April 20, 2017
19 © 2016 TMIT
I am interested in TRIAGE performance improvement topics.
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10% 10%
Very Strongly
Agree
10
Strongly Agree
9
Agree
8
Agree
7
Very Strongly Disagree
1
Disagree
3
Strongly Disagree
2
Neutral
6
Neutral
5
Negative to Neutral
4
90% Agreed and 73% Strongly or Very Strongly Agreed, and 43% Very Strongly Agreed
43%
30%
8%
Source: TMIT High Performer Webinar Series; 2017 Threats & Safety Failure to Rescue: Bedside Patient Rescue A Great Opportunity – April 20, 2017
Anonymous Survey Questions
8% 3%
20 © 2016 TMIT
• How to pick which patients go to which floor • Sepsis • Care team efficiency and ensuring that the patient is admitted to
the correct area more on admission to appropriate location from the ED
• Wrong level of care or inappropriate level of care and how to make sure patients are admitted to the floor that can care for them appropriately
• Direct admissions • Directing end stage disease process patient to better resources
such as hospice and palliative directing end stage disease process patient to better resources such as hospice and palliative care
• Stroke versus MI patient • CVAs, ectopic pregnancies, aortic aneurisms • Admission triage
TRIAGE topics I would like to be covered first include:
Source: TMIT High Performer Webinar Series; 2017 Threats & Safety Failure to Rescue: Bedside Patient Rescue A Great Opportunity – April 20, 2017
21 © 2017 TMIT
Meaningful Use is dead. Long live something better! High Impact Care Hazards to Patients, Students, and Employees
A Medical-Tactical Approach undertaken by clinical and non-clinical people can have enormous impact on loss of life and harm from very common hazards:
• High Impact Care Hazards are
frequent, severe, preventable, and measurable.
• Lifeline Behaviors undertaken by anyone can save lives.
The Program: • Free afterschool courses for grade
three and above. • Courses for Boy and Girl Scouts,
Clubs, and Communities. • Courses for non-clinical staff and
families ideal for healthcare institutions.
• Continuing Education for Clinical Caregivers (CME, CEU, and continuing ed for most caregivers)
Cardiac Arrest
Opioid Overdose
Common Accidents
Bullying
Choking & Drowning
Anaphylaxis
Major Trauma
Transportation Accidents
© 2006 HCC, Inc. CD000000-0000XX 22 © 2016 TMIT
Meaningful Use is dead. Long live something better! High Impact Care Hazards to Patients, Students, and Employees
A National Trauma Care System: Integrating Military and Civilian Trauma Systems to Achieve Zero Preventable Deaths After Injury
Source: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. A national trauma care system: Integrating military and civilian trauma systems to achieve zero preventable deaths after injury. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Dr. Don Berwick Chairman
The Opportunity for YOU SAFETY
LEADERS
23 © 2016 TMIT
I am interested in helping develop a MED TAC PROGRAM in my community.
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
18%
Very Strongly
Agree
10
Strongly Agree
9
Agree
8
Agree
7
Very Strongly Disagree
1
Disagree
3
Strongly Disagree
2
Neutral
6
Neutral
5
Negative to Neutral
4
56% Agreed and 33% Strongly or Very Strongly Agreed, and 32% Very Strongly Agreed
32%
2%
11%
Source: TMIT High Performer Webinar Series; 2017 Threats & Safety Why Hospitals Should Fly: Mortality Reviews & Harm from Omission, Med Tac, and Healthcare Violence– March 16, 2017
Anonymous Survey Questions
5%
12% 9%
4% 2% 7%
24 © 2016 TMIT
• Already have a committee going • Cardiac arrest • Continued diagnosis and treatment in the ED hold area • How to begin a med tac program • How to do it • How to get my institution and community to understand the
need for Med Tac • If we have a county search and rescue program would they be
the ones to oversee/incorporate this program or would it be under our local EMS service?
• Means of organizing misc. Medical personnel for emergency responses from main hospital areas. How can lpn's and medical assistants become part of volunteer, community TAC unit in case of major disasters and national emergencies.
• N/a • Not qualified to help develop Med Tac program, but interested in
every TMIT topic presented • Not sure, need to learn more overall first • Not yet • Opioid crisis; infection prevention • Public school education • Workplace violence
The topics I would like to know more about starting a MED TAC PROGRAM include:
Source: TMIT High Performer Webinar Series; 2017 Threats & Safety Why Hospitals Should Fly: Mortality Reviews & Harm from Omission, Med Tac, and Healthcare Violence– March 16, 2017
25 © 2017 TMIT
Sepsis Introduction What we Learned from Mortality Reviews
Jeanne M. Huddleston, MD, FACP, FHM Hospitalist Chairperson of Mortality Review Subcommittee Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN TMIT High Performer Webinar May 18, 2017
26 © 2017 TMIT
Pragmatic Sepsis Care For Providers: Aligning evidence, guidelines, mandates and policy to inform your daily practice.
Ryan Arnold, MD Emergency Medicine PhysicianDirector of ResearchChristiana Care Health SystemNewark, Delaware TMIT High Performer Webinar May 18, 2017
Pragmatic sepsis care for providers
Ryan Arnold, MD Director of Research, Department of Emergency Medicine
Clinical Investigator, Value Institute [email protected]
Aligning evidence, guidelines, mandates and policy to inform your daily practice
Pragmatic sepsis care for providers
Aligning evidence, guidelines, mandates and policy to inform your daily practice
Objectives:
Preaching to the choir: • Summarize challenges in
sepsis definition misalignment
Caring for actual patients: • Provide an operational
approach for sepsis identification and response
Making sepsis an actual emergency: • Outline an ED-based sepsis
alerting and response effort
Objectives:
Preaching to the choir: • Summarize challenges in
sepsis definition misalignment
Caring for actual patients: • Provide an operational
approach for sepsis identification and response
Making sepsis an actual emergency • Outline an ED-based sepsis
alerting and response effort
Spectrum of acute organ dysfunction secondary to an infection
Septic Shock Sepsis Infection
Org
an F
ailu
re
0
Renal GI
Respiratory Neuro
Cardiovascular
The Sepsis Spectrum
• Refractory Hypotension
• Vasopressor Initiation • Hypoxia
• Confusion
• Bili > 2.0 • Creat > 2.0
Septic Shock Sepsis Infection
Org
an F
ailu
re
0
Septic Shock Sepsis Infection
CMS
CMS
Org
an F
ailu
re
0
After 30 cc/kg: -SBP < 100 or -Lactate ≥ 4
-RR>22 -New O2 requirement -SBP < 100 -Confusion -Creatinine > 2 -Platelets < 150 -Lactate > 2
• HR > 90 • RR > 20 • Temp >38 or <36 • WBC > 12 or <4 • >10% bands
SIRS Organ Failure
Septic Shock Sepsis Infection
SEPSIS-3
SEPSIS-3
Org
an F
ailu
re
0
-MAP < 70 -P/F Ratio < 400 -GCS < 15 -Bilirub >1.2 -Creatinine > 1.2 -Platelets < 150
-Vasopressor requirement + -Lactate > 2
SOFA
Septic Shock Sepsis Infection
CMS
CMS
SEPSIS-3
SEPSIS-3
Org
an F
ailu
re
0
Metabolic: Lactate > 2.0
Systolic BP < 90 mmHg
Anti-infective treatment
- or -
Viral PCR (+)
Cardiovascular: Shock Index > 1.0
Shared Sepsis-3 definition
Unique Sepsis:IOS
Sepsis Definition Comparison
Infection Organ Failure Shock
Shared CMS definition
MAP < 70 mmHg
Hypo-perfusion
Renal: Urine output = 0 x 12 hours BUN > 20 Creatinine > 50% from base
Respiratory: Hypoxia (SpO2 < 95%) New oxygen requirement SpO2 / FiO2 ratio < 421
Hematopoietic: WBC < 4,000 c/mcL
Gastrointestinal Bilirubin > 1.2 mg/dL
Neurologic: Confusion-acute
Mechanical ventilation
Creatinine > 1.2
GCS ≤ 14
Creatinine > 2.0
Platelets < 150,000 c/mcL
Platelets < 100,000 c/mcL
Bilirubin > 2 mg/dL
End-Organ System Dysfunction
Vasopressor use
Lactate > 4
MAP < 65 mmHg -after IV fluids
-sustained >60 mins
-with lactate > 2.0
Hypotension: sBP < 90 mmHg
Unique CMS definition
Competing objectives…
Septic Shock Sepsis Infection
CMS
CMS
SEPSIS-3
SEPSIS-3
Org
an F
ailu
re
0
Objectives:
Preaching to the choir: • Summarize challenges in
sepsis definition misalignment
Caring for actual patients: • Provide an operational
approach for sepsis identification and response
Making sepsis an actual emergency • Outline an ED-based sepsis
alerting and response effort
Trauma
Illne
ss S
ever
ity
Stroke
Acute MI
Sepsis
Sepsis: The perfect patient safety initiative
Day: 1 2 3 0 4 5
S.E.P.S.I.S.: Sepsis Early Prediction Support Implementation System Timeline: 10/2015 –10/2018 Spec Aims: Design and employ data mining, machine learning, predictive analytics and optimization to identify :
1. identify diagnosed patients with sepsis who are deteriorating within the sepsis spectrum
2. corresponding outcomes and personalized therapeutic intervention
Retrospective observational data
– 30 months of consecutive patient visits – 146,552 patients – 244,215 unique visits
46 Program Solicitation NSF 13-543. NSF Proposal ID: 1522072
SEPSIS: Operational definition
Objective - To identify an EHR-based approach to allow for real-time
identification of patients with infection and sepsis
Requirements - EHR-based criteria - No requirement for direct chart review - Scalable to allow real-time identification
- e.g. cannot require ICD-10
Infection
SEPSIS: Operational definition
Infection - administration of a single dose any anti-infective
(antibiotic, antiviral, or antifungal). - Positive PCR test (viral infection)
Infection
Inflammation
SEPSIS: Operational definition
Inflammation - The presence of an abnormality within any of the inflammatory criteria will define a
positive inflammatory state. - Each dysfunction is summative representing an inflammatory burden.
Cellular Response: • WBC > 12,000 • Bandemia > 10% • ESR > 20 mm/hr • CRP > 8 mg/L • Procalcitonin > 0.5
Physiologic Response: • HR ≥ 90 • Resp Rate ≥ 20 • Temp ≥ 38 C (100.4 F) • Temp < 36 C (96.8 F)
Infection
Inflammation
Organ Dysfunction
SEPSIS: Operational definition
• Cardiovascular • Metabolic
• Renal • Respiratory • Hematopoietic • Nervous • Gastrointestinal
Organ Dysfunction • The presence of an
abnormality within any of the specified organ systems criteria will define a positive organ failure state
• Each dysfunction is summative representing an organ failure burden.
Hypo-perfusion
End-Organ System Dysfunction
SEPSIS: Operational definition
Cardiovascular: • sBP < 90 mmHg • MAP < 65 mmHg • Shock Index > 1.0 Metabolic: • Lactate > 2.0 mmol/L
Renal: • Creatinine > 1.2 mg/dL • Creatinine increase > 50% from baseline • Urine output = 0 x 12 hours • BUN > 20
Respiratory: • Hypoxia (SpO2 < 95%) • New oxygen requirement (FiO2 > 21%) • Mechanical ventilation • SpO2 / FiO2 ratio < 421
Hematopoietic: • Platelets < 150,000 c/mcL • WBC < 4,000 c/mcL
Nervous: • GCS < 14 or GCSverb <5
Gastrointestinal • Bilirubin > 2 mg/dL
Organ Dysfunction
Hypo-perfusion
End Organ System Dysfunction
Infection
Inflammation
Organ Dysfunction
Septic Shock
SEPSIS: Operational definition
• SBP < 90 mmHg • MAP < 65 mmHg
Hypotension Septic Shock • Hypotension that occurs:
– At any point after 2L intravenous fluid – Persists for ≥ 60 minutes
independent of IVF administration
• Any administration of a vasopressor
– Independent of blood pressure
Infection
Inflammation
Organ Dysfunction
Septic Shock
SEPSIS: Operational definition
Day: 1 2 3 0 4
Infection
Inflammation
Organ Dysfunction
Septic Shock
SEPSIS: Operational definition
Infection
Day: 1 2 3 0 4
Sepsis Septic Shock
Infection
Inflammation
Organ Dysfunction
Septic Shock
SEPSIS: Operational definition
Case #1 • Patient presents with infection identified on arrival • Develops delayed-onset sepsis (e.g. organ failure) on day 1.5 • Developed septic shock • Discharged with new, chronic organ failure
Day: 1 2 3 0 4
Infection
Inflammation
Organ Dysfunction
Septic Shock
SEPSIS: Operational definition
Day: 1 2 3 0 4
Case #2 • Patient presents with infection identified on arrival • Develops sepsis (e.g. organ failure) on day 0.5 (hour 12) • Developed delayed-onset septic shock • Discharged back at baseline health (resolution of organ failure
and shock)
Infection
Inflammation
Organ Dysfunction
Septic Shock
SEPSIS: Operational definition
Day: 1 2 3 0 4
Case #3 • Patient arrives in septic shock (infection + organ failure + shock) • Develops sepsis (e.g. organ failure) on day 0.5 (hour 12) • Recovers from shock or organ failure by day 2.5 • Discharged back at baseline health
Infection
Inflammation
Organ Dysfunction
Septic Shock
SEPSIS: Operational definition
Day: 1 2 3 0 4
Case #4 • Patient arrives in sepsis (infection + organ failure) • Recovers from sepsis-associated organ failure by day 2.5 • Discharged back at baseline health
Infection
Inflammation
Organ Dysfunction
Septic Shock
Day: 1 2 3 0 4
CMS Sepsis
JAMA Sepsis
CMS Septic Shock
JAMA Septic Shock
One patient…many labels....
Septic Shock Sepsis Infection
CMS
CMS
SEPSIS-3
SEPSIS-3
Org
an F
ailu
re
0
Omitted population
Goal: CMS compliance
Included Included
Septic Shock Sepsis Infection
CMS
CMS
SEPSIS-3
SEPSIS-3
Org
an F
ailu
re
0
Included Included
Goal: Evidence-based compliance
Omitted population
Objectives:
Preaching to the choir: • Summarize challenges in
sepsis definition misalignment
Caring for actual patients: • Provide an operational
approach for sepsis identification and response
Making sepsis an actual emergency: • Outline an ED-based sepsis
alerting and response effort
System Burden
Disease Severity
Disease Label
Resource support
Clinical vigilance Advocacy
Providers Patients & family
Hospital Administration
Awareness
Response
SEPSIS
ED Sepsis Alert 2017
Feedback
• Immediate - ED Process of Care - CMS compliance • Delayed - Patient-centered outcomes “FUTURE”
FUTURES in Sepsis:
Forecasting the Unexpected Transfer to Upgraded REsources in Sepsis
• Method: Gamification of sepsis awareness through the collection of physician and nursing forecasting of a patient’s hospital course at the time of treatment.
FUTURES in Sepsis: • Objectives: Quality improvement effort to 1) increase sepsis awareness and 2) provide direct feedback to the clinical treatment team as to the outcome of individual sepsis patients.
• Data collection: Resuscitation Science Internship, Department of Emergency Medicine
• Patient Follow-up: Resuscitation Science Internship, Department of Emergency Medicine
• Data analytics: CCHS Value Institute • Reports: Monthly reports of aggregate forecasting success and patient
outcomes 1. ED Nursing 2. DFES 3. Sepsis Value Improvement Team 4. Value Institute.
FUTURES in Sepsis:
Forecasting Assessment
o How long will your patient remain in-hospital? o Will an RRT occur at any time? o Will an unanticipated transfer to a higher level
of care occur? o Will an ICU transfer occur? o Will a Code Blue occur? o Will the patient die? o What is your patient’s chance of in-hospital
death?
FUTURES in Sepsis:
http://www.sepsis.org
Concrete Recommendations: 1. Define sepsis
-Institutional agreement on definitions -Location independent!
Infection
Inflammation
Organ Dysfunction
Septic Shock
Infection
Day: 1 2 3 0 4
Sepsis Septic Shock
Concrete Recommendations:
Sepsis IOS: Infection / Organ dysfunction/ Shock
Concrete Recommendations: 1. Define sepsis
-Institutional agreement on definitions -Location independent!
Concrete Recommendations: 1. Define sepsis
-Institutional agreement on definitions -Location independent!
2. Transparent labeling of sepsis
-Nurses, physicians, patients, families, administrators
Concrete Recommendations: 1. Define sepsis
-Institutional agreement on definitions -Location independent!
2. Transparent labeling of sepsis
-Nurses, physicians, patients, families, administrators
3. Make sepsis an emergency -Establish response protocols -Set expectations of care
88 © 2017 TMIT
National Survey Questions
I am interested in MORE DETAIL ON CYBER-HARM AND PT SAFETY.
Very Strongly
Agree
10
Strongly Agree
9
Agree
8
Agree
7
Very Strongly Disagree
1
Disagree
3
Strongly Disagree
2
Neutral
6
Neutral
5
Negative to Neutral
4
CYBER-HARM AND PT SAFETY topics I would like to be FURTHER covered include:
89 © 2017 TMIT
National Survey Questions
I am interested in MORE DETAIL REGARDING SEPSIS.
Very Strongly
Agree
10
Strongly Agree
9
Agree
8
Agree
7
Very Strongly Disagree
1
Disagree
3
Strongly Disagree
2
Neutral
6
Neutral
5
Negative to Neutral
4
Specific SEPSIS TOPICS I would like to be FURTHER covered include:
90 © 2017 TMIT
National Survey Questions
I am interested in MEDICAL RECORD RECOVERY POST CYBER-HARM.
Very Strongly
Agree
10
Strongly Agree
9
Agree
8
Agree
7
Very Strongly Disagree
1
Disagree
3
Strongly Disagree
2
Neutral
6
Neutral
5
Negative to Neutral
4
MEDICAL RECORD RECOVERY POST CYBER-HARM topics I would like to be covered first include:
91 © 2017 TMIT
Speakers and Reactors
Jeanne Huddleston Ryan Arnold, MD Charles Denham MD