Download - Sarma V. Pisupati Professor and Chair, Energy Engineering Program The Pennsylvania State University
![Page 1: Sarma V. Pisupati Professor and Chair, Energy Engineering Program The Pennsylvania State University](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022032517/56649caf5503460f949737f1/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Gas Carbon Reactions and Kinetics
Sarma V. Pisupati
Professor and Chair, Energy Engineering Program
The Pennsylvania State University
![Page 2: Sarma V. Pisupati Professor and Chair, Energy Engineering Program The Pennsylvania State University](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022032517/56649caf5503460f949737f1/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Presentation Outline
1 Gas Carbon Reactions
2 Thermodynamic Consideration
3 Reaction Chemistry and Kinetics
4 Influence of other factors
![Page 3: Sarma V. Pisupati Professor and Chair, Energy Engineering Program The Pennsylvania State University](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022032517/56649caf5503460f949737f1/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Gasification Reactions
C + CO2 = 2 CO +172 kJ/mol Reverse disproportionation
Combustion Reactions
Boudouard Reaction
C + O2 = CO2 - 393.5 kJ/mol Practically irreversible
C+ ½ O2 = CO - 110.5 kJ/mol Practically irreversible
CO + ½ O2 = CO2 - 283.0 kJ/mol Practically irreversible
H2 + ½ O2 = H2O - 285.8 kJ/mol Practically irreversible
![Page 4: Sarma V. Pisupati Professor and Chair, Energy Engineering Program The Pennsylvania State University](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022032517/56649caf5503460f949737f1/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Gasification Reactions (reversible)
C + H2O (steam) CO + H2 + 131.3 kJ/mol
CO+ H2O (steam) CO2 + H2 - 41 kJ/mol
C + 2H2 (steam) CH4 -75 kJ/mol
Water Gas Reaction
Shift Reaction
Hydrogasification Reaction
![Page 5: Sarma V. Pisupati Professor and Chair, Energy Engineering Program The Pennsylvania State University](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022032517/56649caf5503460f949737f1/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Feed Constraints
Maximum O2 utilization whenC CO2
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10 90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
Excess Carbon
Excess Oxygen
Carbon C
Oxygen(O2)
Steam H2O
BA
F
Maximum Carbon utilization whenC CO
E
Maximum Carbon utilization when3C + 2 H2O 2 CO + CH4
D
![Page 6: Sarma V. Pisupati Professor and Chair, Energy Engineering Program The Pennsylvania State University](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022032517/56649caf5503460f949737f1/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Equilibrium conversion for the reaction
Pressure T=800 K T=1000 K T=1500 K
1 0.2054 0.8506 0.9992
10 0.0662 0.454 0.9919
34 0.0360 0.2673 0.9732
C(s) + H2O (g) CO (g) + H2 (g)
Fractional Conversion of steam (x)
![Page 7: Sarma V. Pisupati Professor and Chair, Energy Engineering Program The Pennsylvania State University](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022032517/56649caf5503460f949737f1/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Deviations from Ideal Conditions
Coal char is not graphite
Activity of char > activity of graphite; heat of formation of C >0
Coal pyrolysis which precedes changes the product gas. Coals can have up to 50% volatiles
Excess H2O is used to control the temperature (e.g. Lurgi dry ash)
Gasifier will not operate adiabatically.
Kinetics dominate most gasification processes.
![Page 8: Sarma V. Pisupati Professor and Chair, Energy Engineering Program The Pennsylvania State University](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022032517/56649caf5503460f949737f1/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
KINETICS
![Page 9: Sarma V. Pisupati Professor and Chair, Energy Engineering Program The Pennsylvania State University](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022032517/56649caf5503460f949737f1/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Reaction Steps
1. Diffusion of reactant (s) (steam, carbon dioxide or oxygen) from the bulk to the char surface
2. Diffusion of reactant (s) (steam, carbon dioxide or oxygen) from the surface to the interior of pores of the char
3. Chemisorption of reactant gas(es) on the surface of the char
4. Reaction at the surface
5. Desorption of products from the char surface
6. Diffusion of products to the surface through the pores
7. Diffusion of products from the exterior surface to the bulk of fluid
![Page 10: Sarma V. Pisupati Professor and Chair, Energy Engineering Program The Pennsylvania State University](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022032517/56649caf5503460f949737f1/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Relative Gasification Rates
Reaction Relative Rate at 800 C
C + O2 1 x 105
C + H2O 3
C + CO2 1
C+ H2 1 x 10-3
![Page 11: Sarma V. Pisupati Professor and Chair, Energy Engineering Program The Pennsylvania State University](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022032517/56649caf5503460f949737f1/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Adsorption
• Preferential concentration of ADSORBATE molecules close to surface of the ADSORBENT– Physical adsorption
• Very fast non activated process (Eads 0)
• Involves weak interaction (van der waal forces) between adsorbent and adsorbate
• ΔH≤ 10 kcal/mol
– Chemical adsorption or Chemisorption• Can be activated (Eads)
• Involves valence forces. Chemical reaction at the surface• ΔH ≥20 kcal/mole
![Page 12: Sarma V. Pisupati Professor and Chair, Energy Engineering Program The Pennsylvania State University](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022032517/56649caf5503460f949737f1/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Adsorption and Kinetics
• Reaction rate depends on concentration– RR =f(k, Ci)
In heterogeneous reactions this is surface concentration
Relationship between concentration of reactant in the fluid phase (measurable) and on the surface?From the adsorption isotherm
F(P, adsorbent, adsorbate)
How do we get this?
![Page 13: Sarma V. Pisupati Professor and Chair, Energy Engineering Program The Pennsylvania State University](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022032517/56649caf5503460f949737f1/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Langmuir Isotherm
• Adsorption occurs on specific sites on the surface • One adsorbate molecule (atom) adsorbs on one active site• Adsorption energy is the same for all sites (uniform surface)
1Aads ads AR k p
des des AR k
Fraction of active sites occupied by adsorbate
Fraction of active sites occupied by adsorbateEquilibrium Assumption is that R ads = R des
![Page 14: Sarma V. Pisupati Professor and Chair, Energy Engineering Program The Pennsylvania State University](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022032517/56649caf5503460f949737f1/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Langmuir Expression
(1 )
1
1
ads A A des A
ads AAads A
A des
ads AA
ads A
k p k
k pK p
k
K por
K p
i.e.
Concentration on the surface
Concentration in the fluid phase
![Page 15: Sarma V. Pisupati Professor and Chair, Energy Engineering Program The Pennsylvania State University](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022032517/56649caf5503460f949737f1/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Langmuir Adsorption with Dissociation
• If adsorption involves dissociation of adsorbate molecule into two atoms. For example, O2 2O
22
1
1
ads ads A A
des des A
ads AA
ads A
R k p
R k
K p
K p
Reaction between gas moleculeAnd two active sites
3
3
,
cov
, ( )
Volumeadsorbed cm
Volumeof adsorbatenecessary to er
the surfaceof adsorbent with amonolayer cm STP
dissociative
Non-dissociativeθ
1
0 pA
![Page 16: Sarma V. Pisupati Professor and Chair, Energy Engineering Program The Pennsylvania State University](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022032517/56649caf5503460f949737f1/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Reaction Rate
• Reaction rate of a gas-solid reaction can be represented by
bB
aACCkRateaction Re
scm
Amol
.33cm
Amol
fluid
vScm
cm3
2
Solid, b =1 assumed
).(3
2
cm
g
g
cm
sm
As CkRateaction Re
scm
Amol
.2 3cm
Amol
s
cm
dt
dC
b
a
Sdt
dC
SRate B
v
A
v
11
![Page 17: Sarma V. Pisupati Professor and Chair, Energy Engineering Program The Pennsylvania State University](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022032517/56649caf5503460f949737f1/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Time for Complete Combustion or Gasification of a Solid Particle
• Sv=f(t)
• Key question in kinetics of gasification– Not much of experimental work!
dtSkC
dCvs
A
A
Integration of the rate expression is the challenge!
![Page 18: Sarma V. Pisupati Professor and Chair, Energy Engineering Program The Pennsylvania State University](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022032517/56649caf5503460f949737f1/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
1
1
2
2 2( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( )
( )
k
f k
k
t
C H O g C O H g
C O CO g
C O
C
Adsorbed oxygen atom on a carbon site
Carbon Steam Gasification Reaction Mechanism
Free ActiveSite
Concentration of sites occupied by adsorbed oxygen
Total concentration ofActive sites [Cf+C(O)]
2
2 2
1 2
1 2 1 2 2
11 23
1 12 2
2 2
0
11
H O
a H b H O
d C O dSSAimplies
dt dtk H O
k H O k H k
k Pk H Oi
k k k P k PH H Ok k
![Page 19: Sarma V. Pisupati Professor and Chair, Energy Engineering Program The Pennsylvania State University](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022032517/56649caf5503460f949737f1/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Reaction mechanism of the Boudouard reaction
1
12 ( )k
fk
C CO C O CO
2
( )k
fC O CO C 3
( )k
fC CO C CO
(Walker et al., 1959; Laurendeau, 1978; Johnson, 1979; Kapteijn et a., 1992)
This is real gasification stepAnd often RDS
Dissociation of CO2 on a carbon active site
![Page 20: Sarma V. Pisupati Professor and Chair, Energy Engineering Program The Pennsylvania State University](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022032517/56649caf5503460f949737f1/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Langmuir Hinshelwood Rate Expression
1 2
2
( )
1 ( ) ( )sa b
k p COr
k p CO k p CO
Where,Rs = rate of consumption of carbon due to oxygen exchange mechanismKa = k -1/k2
Kb = k1/k2
k1 increases with increasing temperature;ka decreases with increasing temperature; andkb decreases with increasing temperature,
Reaction rate is dependent on the CO and CO2 partial pressures and is inhibited by the presence of CO.
Retardation effect of CO is reduced with increasingtemperature
![Page 21: Sarma V. Pisupati Professor and Chair, Energy Engineering Program The Pennsylvania State University](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022032517/56649caf5503460f949737f1/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Conc. at ext. SA of the particle (g gas/cm3)
Rate Constant cm/s if m=1
Surface Area cm2/g
Kinetics
mm m SR S kC
s m
L H
Rate k
mobs SRate k C
More parameters, easier to fit experimental dataReflects mechanismParameters generally valid over a wider T,P range
0< m <1
High p, low TDesorption control
Low p, High TAdsorption control
![Page 22: Sarma V. Pisupati Professor and Chair, Energy Engineering Program The Pennsylvania State University](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022032517/56649caf5503460f949737f1/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Effectiveness Factor
• =? effects of mass transport on kinetics• Heterogeneous reaction involve consecutive (series) and /or
parallel processes (rxns)• Two fundamental issues
– RDS– Effect of Diffusion (mass transport) kinetic parameters?
• Global Kinetics Vs Intrinsic Kinetics
![Page 23: Sarma V. Pisupati Professor and Chair, Energy Engineering Program The Pennsylvania State University](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022032517/56649caf5503460f949737f1/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Zones
• Zone 1– Low temperatures, reaction rate
is relatively slow, fluid reactant penetrates all the way to the center of the particle
• Zone 2– Fluid reactant is consumed
completely before reaching the center of the particle
• Zone 3– Fluid reactant is consumed
completely as soon as it reaches the external surface of the particle
III III
Log Rm
1/T =1<<1
![Page 24: Sarma V. Pisupati Professor and Chair, Energy Engineering Program The Pennsylvania State University](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022032517/56649caf5503460f949737f1/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Effectiveness Factor
• Effectiveness factor (eta) is the actual reaction rate (CA=Cavg)divided by the maximum reaction rate (CA=CA0).
• The reaction rate is lower because not all the surface “sees” the same concentration of oxygen
• is f(De, ,)
![Page 25: Sarma V. Pisupati Professor and Chair, Energy Engineering Program The Pennsylvania State University](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022032517/56649caf5503460f949737f1/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Effectiveness FactorChar- O2 Reaction
500
700
900
1100
1300
1500
1700
1900
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
Temperature (K)
Eff
ecti
ven
ess
fact
or
Char- CO2 Reaction
500
700
900
1100
1300
1500
1700
1900
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
Temperature (K)
Eff
ecti
ven
ess
fact
or
237 μm particle91 μm particle
Dhaneswar, S. R. and S. V. Pisupati (2012)" Fuel Processing Technology 102: 156-165.
![Page 26: Sarma V. Pisupati Professor and Chair, Energy Engineering Program The Pennsylvania State University](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022032517/56649caf5503460f949737f1/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Reactivity
• Thermal history of the char (pyrolysis)– volatile content, – The temperature at which coal is pyrolysed, – the soak time of the pyrolysis,– heating rate and the gas atmosphere at which the pyrolysis occurs
Therefore, by making the pyrolysis temperature equal to the gasification temperature, laboratory work will become more representative of industrial reactor work.
![Page 27: Sarma V. Pisupati Professor and Chair, Energy Engineering Program The Pennsylvania State University](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022032517/56649caf5503460f949737f1/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Gasification Reactivity of Various Materials
Higman, 2008
![Page 28: Sarma V. Pisupati Professor and Chair, Energy Engineering Program The Pennsylvania State University](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022032517/56649caf5503460f949737f1/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Effect of Coal rank on Steam Gasification
Several authors have concluded that the reactivity of coal increases with decreasing rank
The difference in reactivity decreases with increasing temperature, because the role of pore diffusion becomes more significant at high temperatures
Agglomerating fluidized-bed and entrained flow gasifiers can operate acceptably with coals of any rank.
Yang, Y. and A. P. Watkinson (1994). Fuel 73(11): 1786-1791
![Page 29: Sarma V. Pisupati Professor and Chair, Energy Engineering Program The Pennsylvania State University](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022032517/56649caf5503460f949737f1/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Steam Gasification Rate
• Varies by a factor of 250
• Found to be catalyzed by Na, Ca and K in the char.
• For higher rank coals (C>80%), variation is less.
Generally as Rank Reactivity
![Page 30: Sarma V. Pisupati Professor and Chair, Energy Engineering Program The Pennsylvania State University](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022032517/56649caf5503460f949737f1/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Surface area variation during char gasification
Molina, A., Mondragon, F., Fuel Vol. 77, No. 15, pp. 1831–1839, 1998
SA presents a maximum for conversions between 20-60%
![Page 31: Sarma V. Pisupati Professor and Chair, Energy Engineering Program The Pennsylvania State University](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022032517/56649caf5503460f949737f1/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Effect of Pyrolysis time (Thermal Annealing) on Gasification reactivity
A longer pyrolysis time led to lower reactivity of a char, due to structural changes in the char during pyrolysis
Pyrolysis time represents the duration of thermal treatment on a coal.
Initial reaction rate of char gasification decreased as pyrolysis time increased
Liu, H et al., Fuel, Volume 83, Issues 7-8, May 2004, Pages 1055-1061
![Page 32: Sarma V. Pisupati Professor and Chair, Energy Engineering Program The Pennsylvania State University](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022032517/56649caf5503460f949737f1/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Miura et al., FUEL, 1989, Vol 68, November 1461
Arrhenius plot of O2 gasification rate per unit surface area for various chars and carbons (converted to values at PO, = 1 atm)
![Page 33: Sarma V. Pisupati Professor and Chair, Energy Engineering Program The Pennsylvania State University](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022032517/56649caf5503460f949737f1/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Gasification by CO2
Differed by an order of magnitude depending on the coke or char:
Related to the size of graphite-like structures. This structure develops even at 900°C and seems to be affected catalytically by coal minerals (particularly Ca, Na and K)
Miura et al., FUEL, 1989, Vol 68, November 1461
![Page 34: Sarma V. Pisupati Professor and Chair, Energy Engineering Program The Pennsylvania State University](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022032517/56649caf5503460f949737f1/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Reactivity of Demineralized Chilenean Coals
![Page 35: Sarma V. Pisupati Professor and Chair, Energy Engineering Program The Pennsylvania State University](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022032517/56649caf5503460f949737f1/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Role of Coal minerals for reactivity
• In the case of lignites, the calcium, finely dispersed in the form of salts of humic acids causes higher reactivity than High Rank coals reactivity
• Negligible effect of minerals on hard coals• The prediction of rates depending on reactor conditions especially on
pressure is difficult for high ash coals due to side reactions with gasifying agents and product gases. Needs experimental data.
• Strong deactivating side reactions for potassium catalyzed gasification with clay minerals kaolinite and illite