Download - Saarni Jenna.word
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
1/79
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
2/79
•
•••••••• HAAGA-HELIAUniversity of Applied Sciences
Financial Fraud - Importance of an Internal Control System
Jenna Saarni
• • • Degree programme in International ••
• Bachelor's ThesisBusiness2!2
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
3/79
•••• •
••• HAAGA-HELIA
"#stract
University of Applied Sciences $ %o& 2!2
International Business
"uthor
Jenna Saarni
roup or year of
entry
loB(S
Title of report
Financial Fraud - Importance of an Internal Control System %um#er of pag-
es and appen-
dices
)$ + )Teacher*s+ or super&isor*s+
J ari ,uomaosi. J aana /elamies. 0li1a#eth San/iguel. Teppo arttala
This thesis tacles the pro#lem of financial fraud. and the goal of the research has #een to
in&estigate the importance and the efficiency of internal control systems3 The precise
research pro#lem is4 ho5 to pre&ent accountants and managers from conducting financial
fraud - importance of ha&ing an internal control system6 The thesis has #een commissioned
#y 7"""-70,I" 8ni&ersity of "pplied Sciences. 5hich e9pects to recei&e &alua#le
research concerning ethics in financial accounting3
To approach the pro#lem. first some theory #ehind fraud. ris management and internal
control 5ill #e looed at3 The t5o of the most famous financial fraud cases. 0nron and the
,ehman Brothers. 5ill #e shortly presented3 These. and an o&er&ie5 of a research on
fraudulent financial reporting in 83S3 pu#lic companies. 5ill gi&e the reader an insight of
the seriousness of the topic3
The research has #een focused on consultants. as e9perts of the topic. representing the Big
Four auditing companies3 In addition to these. a recent fraud case in Company : has #een
e9amined3 The data collection has #een conducted 5ith the use of a ;e#ropol sur&ey and
inter&ie5s3 The research process has taen place during late spring and early autumn 2!23
The collected data has #een analysed 5ith comparison to the theory frame5or3 The C
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
4/79
Table of contents
! Introduction 33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333 !
!3! Thesis topic 3333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333 2
!32 =esearch pro#lem and in&estigati&e ?uestions 33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333332!3@ Demarcation 33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333 @
!3A >ey concepts 33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333A
!3$ Commissioning company 333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333$
2 Theory frame5or 3333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333)
23! Fraud 33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333 )
232 Financial fraud 33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333
23@ 7ighlights in financial reports 33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333(23A Company cases on fraudulent accounting 333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333!@
23A3! 0nron 333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333!@
23A32 ,ehman Brothers 7oldings Inc3 3333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333!$
23A3@ Fraudulent financial reporting in 83S3 pu#lic companies 3333333333333333333333333333!)
23$ Internal control 33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333!
23$3! Internal control frame5or #y C/ 33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333332@@ =esearch methodology 33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333332(
@3! =esearch design 33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333332(
@32 =esearch process 333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333@
@323! Sur&ey 3333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333 @
@3232 Inter&ie5s 33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333@
A Data collection 33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333@2
A3! Sur&ey 3333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333 @2A3!3! =oles. responsi#ilities and decision-maing 333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333@2
A3!32 Controlling the company - Current internal control system 333333333333333333333333@@
A3!3@ Board meetings and relationships 3333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333@)
A3!3A Fraud 333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333@
A32 Inter&ie5s 3333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333@
A323! =is management 33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333A
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
5/79
A3232 Internal control 333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333A!
A323@ Fraud 333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333A)
$ Data =esults and "nalysis 33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333A(
$3! /anagers' &ie5s on internal control 333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333A(
$32 0ffecti&eness of an internal control system 3333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333$
$323! "nalysis according to the eight pillars of C
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
6/79
1 Introduction
"s long as humans ha&e e9isted. fraud and #etrayal ha&e as 5ell3 For some reason. itseems also as though greed for money and success are part of human nature3 During the
past years numerous amounts of corporate accounting scandals ha&e #een in the
headlines. pro#a#ly the most no5n ones ha&e #een the 0nron case in 2! and in 2
the ,ehman Brothers case3
0nron and their accounting firm "rthur "nderson systematically produced fraudulent
financial reports and engaged in unethical accounting #y misrepresenting earnings and
hiding lia#ilities and de#ts *=oger 2!+3 ;hen the depth of the deception came out to the
pu#lic. in&estors and creditors retreated. forcing the company into #anruptcy in Decem#er
2!3 The scandal that happened 5ith ,ehman Brothers 5as similar3 ,ehman Brothers 5as
the fourth largest in&estment #an in the 8S. and the #anruptcy it had to file 5as the
largest e&er made in 8S history3 The company regularly used accounting gimmics at the
end of each ?uarter to mae its finances appear less shay than they really 5ere3 "fter the
fall of ,ehman Brothers. other #ans follo5ed and this is #elie&ed to #e the #eginning of the2 starting glo#al financial crisis3 *Bloom#erg Business ;ee 2( 3+
/. 0rnst & Goung and Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu *;iipedia
2!2+3 This rises up ?uestions on ho5 it has #een possi#le to scam the ones 5ho should #e
there to reassure the relia#ility of the records3
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
7/79
Thomas & Su5ardy 2!!. 2@)+3 If all of three corners of the triangle e9ist a high
possi#ility for a person to commit fraud e9ists3
The thesis 5ill tae a loo at internal control procedures. in theory and in practice3 In order
to get a #etter picture on the topic. the thesis 5ill #egin 5ith fraudulent accounting cases
and continue 5ith theory on internal control 5ith different concepts and models3 =esearch
on 5hat no5 is happening in consulting companies 5ill #e made #y a sur&ey and
inter&ie5s3 The final goal is to find out 5hether implementing an internal control system
can actually pre&ent fraud3
1.1 Thesis topic
"s the name of the report. Fraudulent "ccounting - Importance of an Internal Control
System. suggests the thesis 5ill #e #ased on ethical issues related to accounting. 5hich
include the compliance 5ith international accounting standards. local la5s and regulations.
and the importance of ha&ing an internal control system3 Fraudulent accounting and internal
control fall under the phenomenon of ris and management accounting. 5hich should
no5adays #e a part of all enterprises3 0ffecti&e ris management includes ris assessment.
ris e&aluation. ris treatment. and ris reporting *Collier. Berry & Bure 2. !+3 The
thesis 5ill tae a loo at the importance of internal control and the different possi#ilities of
ho5 companies are a#le to Hcoo the #oosH and in 5hich 5ay this ind of #eha&ior can #e
pre&ented3
The goal is to find out ho5 accountants and managers should #e controlled and or
moti&ated to conduct ethical #eha&iour in financial accounting. so that companies 5ould
produce truthful and relia#le financial records3 The interest is also in 5hy does fraud
happen and ho5 can it #e pre&ented already in the &ery initial stages3
1.2 Research problem and investigative questions
The research pro#lem for the thesis is
7o5 to pre&ent accountants and managers from conducting financial fraud - im-
portance of ha&ing an internal control system6
2
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
8/79
The in&estigati&e ?uestions are *hereinafter IE's+
IE! ;hat are managers' &ie5s on internal control generally and in their company6
09ample of real practice current internal control system3
IE2 7o5 efficiently does an internal control system pre&ent fraud6
IE@ 7o5 to pre&ent fraud in the &ery initial stages6 "nd 5hat are the de&elopment
ideas and suggestions to impro&e internal control6
In addition to researching the in&estigati&e ?uestions. the theoretical #acground 5ill
include research on challenges and pro#lems concerning ethics in accounting and internal
control. as 5ell as Hfailure pointsH on 5hat ha&e happened in the past #y presenting
e9amples of ,ehman Brothers and 0nron3 By doing the #acground and the empirical
research. the final results of the thesis should represent a thorough ans5er for the
research pro#lem3
The o&erlay matri9 includes all the essential information on 5hat the thesis and research at
hand includes *attachment !+3 Starting from the research pro#lem. and then #reaing it
do5n to the in&estigati&e ?uestions. the o&erlay matri9 presents the theoretical frame5or.
measurement ?uestions used and finally the results3 0ach of the mentioned applied
separately for each in&estigati&e ?uestion3
1.3 Demarcation
This is a #usiness management pro#lem in the field of finance. and more specifically in
accounting and consultation companies3 The focus is on daily 5or. related to control and
moti&ation from the management to the employees3 The focus is #et5een three parties
manager. accountant and outside auditor. #ut this thesis 5ill mainly focus on the
management's point of &ie53 The aspect of control 5ill #e discussed from a company's
internal aspect. and there 5ill #e no focus on e9ternal control presented3
@
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
9/79
%eed for an internal control system
I
;hat is controlled6 ;hy is controlled6 7o5 is controlled6
Figure !3 Demarcation ?uestions
The three ?uestions presented a#o&e 5ill #e the core for the thesis and the ans5ers to these
?uestions 5ill #e deeply discussed *figure 1 ). Similarly ?uestions related to fraud 5ill need
to #e ans5ered3 Conceptuali1ing the research pro#lem to
7o5 to pre&ent accountants and managers from conducting unethical #eha&ior in
financial accounting - importance of ha&ing an internal control system6
"nd
;hat recommendations can #e gi&en #ased on the research findings6
1.4 Ke concepts
This chapter presents the definitions of the ey concepts used throughout the thesis3 The
concepts 5ill #e discussed in more detail in chapter 2. the theory frame5or3
!raud" /isrepresentation of facts. purpose of persuading another party to act in a 5ay
that causes inury or damage to that party *7arrison et al3 2!!. 2@@+3
Internal #ontrol" " system of procedures implemented #y company management3 It is
designed to follo5 o#ecti&es as safeguard assets. encourage employees to follo5company policy. promote operational efficiency. ensure accurate. relia#le accounting
records and comply 5ith legal re?uirements3 *7arrison et al3 2!!. 2@3+ Ris$
management" The process of understanding and managing the riss that the organisation
is ine&ita#ly su#ect to in attempting to achie&e its corporate o#ecti&es *Collier et al3
2. !+3
4
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
10/79
The %ig !our" =efers to the four currently #iggest auditing and consultancy com-
panies >/. 0rnst & Goung. Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu and 5C *rice5ater-
houseCoopers+ *Financial Times ,e9icon 2!2+3
1.& #ommissioning compan
The thesis has #een commissioned #y 7"""-70,I" 8ni&ersity of "pplied Sciences3 "
part of the Degree rogramme in International Business is to educate and guide students to
#ecome ethical thiners. 5ho act in a social responsi#le 5ay *7"""-70,I" 2!2a+3 The
ethical issues related to finance and financial accounting discussed so far during the actual
courses. are ?uite limited3 Therefore. the thesis and research presented here #ring added
&alue to the degree program and pro&ide ne5 insight to fello5 students3
7"""-70,I" 8ni&ersity of "pplied Sciences is part of the Finnish pu#lic educational
system. 5hich is run pri&ately #ut steered and co-funded #y the Finnish /inistry of
0ducation and Culture3 The uni&ersity has around ! $ students and employees. 5ho
#ase their acti&ities on highly ad&anced national and international e9pertise3 The school
pro&ides education on #usiness. hotel. restaurant and tourism management. information
technology. ournalism. management assistant training. sports management and &ocational
teacher education3 *7"""-70,I" 2!2#3+ The author and researcher of this thesis has
studied international #usiness and specialised in finance3
By commissioning this thesis. 7"""-70,I" e9pects the research to pro&ide &alua#le
findings on ethical issues related to finance in an international conte9t3 By lining
theoretical concepts to actual real life practices. the topic of financial fraud 5ill #ecome
more e9plicit for future students and graduates3 Therefore pro&ide added &alue for the
degree program as 5ell as future students3
$
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
11/79
2 Theor frame'or$
First as theoretical #acground on the topic. the #asic concepts related to fraudulentaccounting and the theory around e9isting internal control systems needs to #e e9plained3
This part of the report 5ill mainly ans5er to t5o ?uestions
! ;hat are the challenges and pro#lems concerning ethics in accounting and internal
control6
2 ;hat has happened in the past - Hfailure pointsH of case e9amples ,ehman
Brothers and 0nron3
2.1 !raud
Fraud is one of the top concerns for corporate e9ecuti&es3 During the recent years many
organi1ations ha&e faced corporate scandals due to fraud. maing the e9ecuti&es face the
conse?uences of large fines and prison time *0rnst & Goung 2(+3 The term. fraud. can #e
defined as the misrepresentation of facts. purpose of persuading another party to act in a
5ay that causes inury or damage to that party *7arrison et al3 2!!. 2@@+3 " model. the
Fraud Triangle. created #y criminologist Donald =3 Cressey. represents the three factors that
push an ordinary person to commit fraud *figure 2+3
Opportunity
Motivation
Figure 23 The Fraud Triangle *8C/erced 2!2+
If a person has all the three ingredients. moti&ation. opportunity and rationali1ation. a high
possi#ility to commit fraud e9ists *7arrison et al3 2!!. 2@A+3
)
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
12/79
From these three factors. moti&ation and opportunity are something the organisation can
ha&e an effect on3 These t5o are directly influenced #y the corporate en&ironment and
further more #y management3 The opportunity can arise #y the lac of control and security5ithin the company3 The moti&ation. or pressure *as referred #y 0rnst & Goung+. can #e
created #y demands of higher earnings. or it can also arise from the top of the company3 "
tone that places an impropriate emphasis on financial results or stoc price may send the
message that cutting corners is accepta#le3 *0rnst & Goung 2(. !3+ =ationalisation is
more of a psychological factor. 5hich arises from 5ithin the indi&idual person3 By
rationalising the fraudulent #eha&iour. the person committing the fraud assures him or
herself that it is accepta#le to #e doing so3 *7arrison et al3 2!!. 2@A3+ To gi&e an e9ample. a person could rationalise stealing money. as HI ha&e al5ays 5ored so hard. therefore I
deser&e itH. this 5ay a person maes the act feel as if it 5as ustified3
The common types of corporate fraud are misappropriation of assets. fraudulent financial
reporting and corruption3 From these the first one mentioned is the most common one3
"ccording to the 2 "CF0 =eport to the %ation on
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
13/79
0&en though fraudulent financial reporting seems to #e the least fre?uent form of fraud. it
is #y far the most e9pensi&e. in terms of #oth money and long-term damage3 "ccording to
the same "CF0 report mentioned #efore. the median loss of a fraudulent statement incident5as L2 million. compared 5ith L@$. for corruption and L!$. for asset
misappropriation3 In addition to the monetary losses. the company loses its in&estor
confidents. its reputation is damaged and on top of all high fines and criminal actions are at
hand3 *0rnst & Goung 2(. 23+
The "ssociation of Certified Fraud 09aminers has de&eloped a list of common accounting
fraud schemes and associated red flags. on 5hich managers should #e a5are of3 These
schemes and related red flags mostly happen 5ith o&erstating re&enues. understating
e9penses or improper asset &aluation3 The follo5ing paragraphs 5ill descri#e these and the
related red flags in more detail3
(verstating revenues or incorrectly recogni1ing re&enues are one of the most common
types of fraud on financial statements3 The schemes include recording gross re&enue.
instead of net4 recording re&enues of other companies 5hen acting as a HmiddlemanH4
recording sales that ha&e not happened4 recording future sales in the current period and4
recording sales of products that are out on consignment3 The red flags in these inds of
situations are increased re&enues. 5ithout a corresponding increase in cash flo54 unusual
or highly comple9 transactions. especially ones closed near the end of a financial period4 in
recei&a#les the unusual e9pansion of days' sales4 or high re&enue gro5th 5hen competitors
are e9periencing 5ea sales3 *0rnst & Goung 2(. 23+
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
14/79
S*@.4pS 2.(
!.!$
)@( $).! !.$$
A!A A!A
).2M !$.$(
).( !.)
*))+ $.$!2
S*2.)+ S $.!
and others that are shrining in percentage terms or are other5ise out of line 5ith the
companies from the same industry3 *0rnst & Goung 2(. @3+
Improper asset valuation is also a type of fraud used3 The schemes used are manipulating
reser&es. changing the useful li&es of assets. not maing a 5rite do5n 5hen needed. and
manipulating the fair &alue of assets3 The red flags related to these include repeating
negati&e cash flo5s. #ut reporting of earnings4 noticea#le decrease in customer demand and
increasing #usiness failure in the industry or the economy4 or estimates on assets. lia#ilities.
re&enues and e9penses are #ased on su#ecti&e su#ects and high uncertainties3
Some other schemes related to fraudulent financial reporting can also relate to so called
smoothing of re&enues. so o&erestimating lia#ilities during HgoodH periods. and storing
a5ay funds for future use4 reporting information improperly. especially 5hen it comes to
issues related to HpartyH -transactions and loans to management4 or e9ecuting highly
comple9 transactions3 *0rnst & Goung 2(. A3+
"ccording to the same "CF0's 2 report. as mentioned #efore. ))K of occupational fraud
5as detected #y tips or #y accident3 The sur&ey re&ealed that tips 5ere the most fre?uentlyreported source of initial detection *A)K+. follo5ed #y accident *2K+3 !(K of fraud 5as
unco&ered #y internal audit and 2@K 5as unco&ered #y internal controls3 0&en though the
ad&ancements in technology and the highly regulated climate. it seems that the leading
source of fraud detection is still #y tip or #y accident3 *0rnst & Goung 2(. A3+
2.3 *ighlights in financial reports
This chapter 5ill &isualise the financial reports and pinpoint the specific lines 5ere the
most common types of fraud on financial statements ha&e occurred3 To tae an e9ample.
the chapter 5ill e9amine reports presented #y ,ehman Brothers 7oldings Inc3 deli&ered to
the 8S Securities and 09change Commission the same year the company filed for
#anruptcy3 First to o#ser&e are some e9amples from the ,ehman Brothers ?uarterly
income statement 2. #efore the #anruptcy *figure @+3
(
,07/"% B=
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
15/79
!.2$ 2.
!.2( !.!
!.A$ !(.)A
$@ (
!.)! 2(.@M
!$.! !.!$
2.@( !.$$(
M.!)) $.2)
)!2 $$@
$M @($
@@ 2(
!( 2!
!$ !M
2@$ !2
2.( !.$
).2)@ ).(!
*@.A2A+ @.$
*!.!@(+ !.!$(
S*2.2$+ S 2.A!(
S*2.M+ S 2.@$
S *A3@@+ S M3M2
S *A3@@+ S M3!
S 3@M S 3@2.@2$ 2.!
@( 2
2$2 2!
! !$2
! !2
!
$$
(!$
@.A!( @.)@@
*A.+ !.(
*!.@!@+ ))
S*2.M
S !.2@
S*2.@
S !.2$)
%on-Interest 09penses
Compensation and #enefits
Technology and communications Broerage.
clearance and distri#ution fees
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
16/79
%usinessdsrclogrnenr
Total non-personnel e9penses
Total non-interest e9penses
Income #efore ta9es
ro&ision for income ta9es• .et income
%et income applica#le co common stoc
0arnings per common share
Basic
Diluted
Di&idends paid per common share
S
*$3!A+
S
*$3!A+
S 3!
S 23@@ S
232! S
3!$
Sec %otes to Consolidated Financial StatementsN
Figure @3 ,ehman Brothers consolidated income statement *8nited States Securities and
09change Commission 2. A+
"s discussed in the pre&ious chapter. o&erstating re&enues or incorrectly recogni1ing
re&enues are one of the most common types of fraud affecting financial statements3 This can
#e seen in the income statement under different headings. as highlighted in figure @3 "s you
5ill read in the upcoming chapter *23A32+. one of the gimmics used #y
,ehman Brothers 5as to incorrectly recogni1e re&enues3 8nderstating e9penses can also
#e used in maing the operating income and o&erall net income seem higher3 In the %otes
to the statements. ,ehman Brothers descri#es their re&enue recognition policies. under
rincipal transactions. as follo5s
!
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
17/79
23
=eali1ed and unreali1ed gains or losses from Financial instruments and other in&entory
positions o5ned and Financial instruments and other in&entory positions sold #ut not yet
purchased. as 5ell as the gains or losses from certain short- and long-term #orro5ing
o#ligations. principally certain hy#rid financial instruments. and certain deposit lia #ilities at
#ans that the Company measures at fair &alue are reflected in rincipal transactions in the
Consolidated Statement of Income3 *8nited States Securities and 09change Commission2. !!3+
"ccording to this. it can #e interpreted that many complicated financial instruments and
transactions ha&e #een used #y the company. and therefore. in this case. it has #een a#le to
disguise something that should ha&e #een reported as #orro5ings. under
re&enues3
Similarly. the #alance sheet can #e presented in a fraudulent manner3 "s discussed in the
pre&ious chapter. improper asset &aluation is also a type of fraud companies ha&e used3
The possi#le fraudulent procedures can include manipulating reser&es. changing the useful
li&es of assets. not reporting do5n 5hen needed. and manipulating the fair &alue of assets3
Figure A presents some of these points highlighted3 To gi&e an e9ample. ,ehman Brothers'
%otes on ho5 the long-li&ed assets ha&e #een &alued are as follo5s
roperty. e?uipment and leasehold impro&ements are recorded at historical cost. net of
accumulated depreciation and amorti1ation3 Depreciation is recogni1ed using the straight-
line method o&er the estimated useful li&es of the assets3 Buildings are depreci ated up to a
ma9imum of A years3 ,easehold impro&ements are amorti1ed o&er the lesser of their useful
li&es or the terms of the underlying leases. 5hich range up to @ years3 0?uipment. furniture
and fi9tures are depreciated o&er periods of up to ! years3 Internal-use soft5are that
?ualifies for capitali1ation under "I C" Statement of osition (-!. "ccounting for the
Costs of Computer Soft5are De&eloped or
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
18/79
!2A.CA2Securities #orro5ed
=ecei&a#les
Broers. dealers and clearing o3rgani1ations !).B!
Customers 2.BCA
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
19/79
0&en though in ,ehman's case. there hadn't #een any improper asset &aluation. the #alance
sheet and the %otes present an e9ample of 5here fraudulent reporting could tae place3 "s
the %otes e9plain. the property. e?uipment and leasehold impro&ements are &alued athistorical cost. 5hich for e9ample could mean that the inflation or other economic factors
affecting the &alues ha&e not #een taen into consideration3 "s a more detailed e9ample. it
mentions that #uildings are depreciated up to a ma9imum of A years3
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
20/79
5ith the same products and ser&ices3 "s the operations of 0nron e9panded. so did their
performance in the stoc maret3 *alepu & 7ealy 2@. @-$3+
Through years. as 0nron's operations gre5 into different le&els. its #usiness model turned
more comple93 This lead to difficulties 5ith the financial reporting. maing the company
face the limits of accounting3 T5o issues 5here specifically pro#lematic3 First of all. the
trading side of the #usiness in&ol&ed comple9 long-term contracts3 0nron used an approach
called mar-to-maret accounting to recognise income3 This meant that the management 5as
maing forecasts of energy prices and interest rates 5ell into the future. 5hereas current
accounting rules re?uire the use of present &alue calculations3 Secondly. 0nron hea&ily reliedon structured finance transactions. 5hich in&ol&ed setting up special purpose entities3 These
transactions included shared cash flo5s and riss 5ith outside in&estors and lenders3
Traditional accounting faced difficulties in reporting these transactions. and created
differences #et5een economic reality and actual accounting num#ers3 *alepu & 7ealy
2@. !-!!3+
The mar-to-maret accounting used #y the company meant that once a long-term
contract 5as signed. the present &alue of the future cash inflo5s 5ere recognised as
re&enues and the present &alue of the e9pected costs 5ere accounted as e9penses3
8nrealised gains and losses of these long-term contracts that 5ere not hedged 5ere. 5hen
they occurred. then reported as part of the annual earning3 The main pro#lem 5as in
estimating the real maret &alue of the contracts3 Income 5as estimated as the present
&alue of net future cash flo5s. e&en though the related costs and &ia#ility of the contracts
5ere often &ery uncertain3 *alepu & 7ealy 2@. !!3+
Special purpose entities 5ere used to fund or manage riss. 5hich 5ere related to specific
assets3 These special purpose entities are shell companies created #y sponsors and funded #y
e?uity in&estors and de#t financing3 By 2!. 0nron had used hundreds of these entities3
Se&eral of these entities 5ere used to a&oid some essential accounting principles3 For
e9ample. 0nron 5as a#le to a&oid consolidating these special purpose entities to its financial
reports. 5hich resulted in 0nron's #alance sheet to understate its lia#ilities and o&erstate its
e?uity and earnings3 In 2!. 0nron announced that to!A
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
21/79
correct its financial statements through the four year period *from !(( to 2+ it 5ould
reduce its earnings #y L)!@ million *2@K of reported profits+. increase its lia#ilities #y L)2
million *)K of lia#ilities and $3$K of e?uity+ and reduce its e?uity #y L!32 #illion *!K+3 Dueto 0nron's high pu#lic de#t and loss of in&estor confidence. in Decem#er 2! 0nron finally
filed for #anruptcy3 *alepu & 7ealy 2@. !2-!A3+
0nron's auditors. "rthur "ndersen. recei&ed most of the #lame for not recognising the
pro#lems 0nron had in its accounting system3 "rthur "ndersen 5as in charge of re&ie5ing
0nron's compliance 5ith the 8S "" and the company's internal
controls3 Instead. "rthur "ndersen 5as accused of ha&ing shay standards in their 0nronaudits. mainly #ecause it 5as recei&ing significant income on consulting and auditing fees.
therefore ha&ing a conflict of interest3 For e9ample. in 2 "rthur "ndersen earned around
L$2 million from auditing and consulting 0nron3 Finally 5hen the in&estigations of 0nron
came pu#lic. "ndersen attempted to co&er up their in&ol&ement #y shredding up e&idence of
supporting documents3 *alepu & 7ealy 2@. !-!(3+ In 22 "rthur "ndersen 5as con&icted
of o#structing ustice and the company is no longer functioning *Freifeld & Sandler 2!+3
2.4.2 ,ehman %rothers *oldings Inc.
,ehman Brothers 5as founded in !$ in the 8S3 "fter the 8S Ci&il ;ar the company mo&ed
into %e5 Gor and soon gre5 into one of ;all Street's in&estment giants3 In Septem#er 2
,ehman Brothers filed for the largest #anruptcy e&er made in 8S history3 The collapse sent
glo#al financial marets into a panic. pushing the glo#al credit marets close to the edge3 In
2!. the accounting firm 0rnst & Goung 5as sued for helping ,ehman Brothers to Hengage in
a massi&e accounting fraudH3 *The %e5Gor Times 2!23+
It is said that the difficulties for ,ehman Brothers #egan in 2. as the mortgage maret
crisis around su#prime and prime mortgages unfolded3 In 2!. a chairman of the la5 firm
Jenner & Bloc and a former federal prosecutor. "nton =3 aluas. pu#lished an e9aminer
report on the #an3 "ccording to the in&estigations. ,ehman Brothers had #een using
accounting gimmic to hide its true financial position3 The!$
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
22/79
company 5as a#le to temporarily shuffle L$ #illion of trou#led assets off its #oos a fe5
months #efore its collapse in 23 This 5as to conceal its dependence on le&erage. or
#orro5ed money3 "ccording to aluas. the company's e9ecuti&es and its accountants at0rnst O Goung 5ere a5are of these transactions3 *The %e5Gor Times 2!23+ In the end of
2!. %e5 Gor "ttorney eneral. "ndre5 Cuomo. sued 0rnst O Goung for helping ,ehman
Brothers in a Hmaor accounting fraudH *Freifeld O Sandler 2!+3
"ccording to Cuomo and aluas. ,ehman Brothers decei&ed in&estors and the pu#lic a#out
its financials #y using so called H=epo !$H transactions3 These transactions are sale and
repurchase agreements. or in other 5ords. a form of short-term financing3 ,ehman used these
to temporary mo&e lia#ilities *in total as much as L $ #illion+ off its #alance sheet to sho5
that it 5as not carrying too much de#t3 Cuomo re&eals that the =epo !$ transactions 5ere
initially reported as #orro5ings. #ut then in 2! according to ne5 accounting rules #y 0rnst
O Goung they 5ere portrayed as sales3 These of course ga&e a fraudulent impression on the
company's le&erage ratios and mislead its in&estors3 *Freifeld O Sandler 2!3+
0rnst O Goung. as the company's accountants. should ha&e ensured that the financial
statements complied 5ith "" and 5ere not misleading the pu#lic3 Instead. according to
Cuomo. 0OG no5ingly helped ,ehman Brothers to Hmanage #alance sheet metricsH3
%e&ertheless. the final responsi#ility should ha&e #een 5ith the company's management. as
e&en though financial reports may not #e &iolating the 8S "" they can still #e
materially misleading3 *Freifeld O Sandler 2!3+ The in&estment #an faced a lot of
la5suits3 For e9ample. in "ugust 2!!. former officials of ,ehman Brothers agreed to pay
L( million to settle a la5suit accusing them of misleading in&estors a#out the company's
financial situation in the months leading up to its fall3 *The %e5Gor Times 2!23+
2.4.3 !raudulent financial reporting in -.. public companies
Fraudulent Financial =eporting !((-2 -"n "nalysis on 83S3 u#lic Companies 5as a
comprehensi&e study. commissioned #y the Committee of Sponsoring!)
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
23/79
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
24/79
committed fraudulent reporting 5ere audited #y the Big Four auditing firms3 *Beasley et al3
2!. @-$3+
"fter the 0nron and ,ehman Brother cases. in 22 as a mean to pre&ent fraudulent
financial reporting a ne5 8S legislation. called the Sar#anes-
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
25/79
The Committee of Sponsoring
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
26/79
During recent years. the concern o&er fraud and the focus on ris management ha&e highly
increased3 C
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
27/79
Figure $3 C
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
28/79
+vent Identification - Internal and e9ternal e&ents affecting achie&ement of o#ecti&es
need to #e identified. and determined as riss and opportunities3
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
29/79
do e9ist3 "s the operators of the system are merely human. mistaes and errors are
naturally a part of so called human failures3 *C
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
30/79
its system control en&ironment. identification and e&aluation of riss and control
o#ecti&es. control acti&ities. information and communication processes. and processes
for monitoring the effecti&eness of the system of internal control3 Figure ) #elo5represents the fi&e different components mentioned. 5ith the #oard as the centre of
all3 *>/ !(((. !(-2!3+
The fi&e common components of control
Figure )3 The fi&e components of control *>/ !(((. 22+
7o5e&er. it is not enough only to ha&e all the components present. it is also important to
understand the nature and the conte9t of the control3 First of all. as control should #e capa#le
of responding ?uicly to e&ol&ing riss. it is important to get the control as close to the ris
as possi#le3 The company needs to ha&e the capacity to respond and adapt to une9pected
riss and situations. and to mae decisions despite ha&ing all the information3 This is 5hy
the control needs to #e close to the associated riss - the shorter the chain. the ?uicer the
reaction3 *>/ !(((. 223+
Secondly. the costs of the control need to #e in #alance against the #enefit of controlling
the ris3 "s it may happen that the cost of additional control #ecomes greater than the
actual #enefit arising from the controlling of the ris3 Thirdly. the control system needs to
include reporting procedures. 5hich communicate immediately to the right management
le&els of any significant control failings or 5eanesses that are identified3 The reporting
should include also details of the actions #eing undertaen3 This also means that the
philosophy of control should come from 2A
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
31/79
@3
the top of the company. 5ith an emphasis on continual learning. instead of a #laming
culture3
0&en though control can minimi1e errors and riss. it cannot for sure pro&ide a#solute
assurance that they 5ill not happen3 %e&ertheless. it 5ould #e important to #lend the control
system in the company's operations and ha&e it as a part of the company's corporate culture3
"s a company is run #y indi&iduals. the control system is affected #y people throughout the
company3 By maing these indi&iduals. so all the people in the company accounta#le. the
lielihood of an effecti&e control system is increased3 *>/ !(((. 22-2A3+
>/ has de&eloped a =is /anagement Diagnostic. to help organisations follo5
5hether all of the necessary components for an efficiently 5oring internal control system
e9ist *figure +3 The diagnostic has #een &isualised as a triangle. representing se&en
components. and rele&ant ?uestions under e&ery title for managers to consider3
2$
hilosophy and policy
Is your organisations ris management philosophy and policy clearly defined. communicated and endorsed
#y the #oard6
"re there clearly defined roles and responsi#ilities for the identification. management and reporting of ris6
Beha&iour
"re those responsi#le for ris pro&ided 5ith appropriate formal training6
Does the organisation learn from the ris e&ents 5hen things go 5rong rather than see retri#ution6
=oles and responsi#ilities
Is the responsi#ility for reporting clearly defined6
"re responsi#ilities 5ritten into all rele&ant employee o# descriptions6
Demonstration of performance and ris effecti&eness
Is the #oard pro&ided 5ith a clear picture of performance6 "re
>l's clearly defined and measured6
Con&erting strategy to #usiness o#ecti&es 3bllosoe5hamd polic
Do #usiness o#ecti&es reflect strategy6
"re #usiness o#ecti&es clearly communicated6
erformance appetite
Is your organisation's ris appetite e9plicitly and
clearly defines6
"re action plans de&eloped to mo&e the organ-
isation to a more desired ris profile6
=is to deli&ering performance
Does the ris information assist man-
tored for the riss6
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
32/79
agement in identifying accumulations
and dependencies6
"re management actions and
controls identified and moni-
Figure 3 =is /anagement Diagnostic *>/ !(((. 2$+
In addition to the =is /anagement Diagnostic. the triangle a#o&e represents the
frame5or companies should use to assess the effecti&eness of their internal control
system3 >/ #elie&es that for any control model to 5or effecti&ely and #e rele&ant to
the performance of the #usiness. it must contain these ey components3
2)
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
33/79
Starting from the tip of the triangle. hilosoph and polic6 represents ho5 the #oard should
mae the ris management e9pectations e9plicit3 0mployees need to no5 5hat is e9pected
from them and 5hat is not3 Roles and responsibilities represent the importance of maingall the roles and responsi#ilities of the ey performers e9plicit3 #onverting strateg to
business o#ecti&es includes the idea of maing strategic and #usiness o#ecti&es e9plicit3
This 5ay the lielihood of o&erlooing significant riss 5ill #e reduced. as the lin #et5een
strategy and #usiness planning is a critical ris management process3 Ris$ to delivering
performance refers to ho5 the significant #usiness riss should #e formally identified #y the
#oard and this 5ay sho5 that they are a5are of the possi#le riss3 In the left #ottom of the
pyramid >/ has erformance appetite. This means that the pro#a#ility of the ris ofoccurring and of the impact of that ris should #e analysed3 The cost and #enefit relations
need to #e analysed as 5ell3 Demonstration of performance and ris$ effectiveness refers
to ho5 performance should #e monitored against targets4 an assessment of the effecti&eness
of the control should periodically #e pro&ided to the #oard3 This process has some circularity.
as monitoring may lead to re-e&aluating the company's o#ecti&es or control3 Finally. the
triangle has %ehaviour6 5hich represents shared ethical &alues3 These &alues. including
integrity. authority. responsi#ility and accounta#ility. should #e esta#lished. communicatedand practiced around the 5hole organisation3 *>/ !(((. )-)3+
Some of the most common 5eanesses in organisations happen 5ith *>/ !(((. 2)+
hilosoph - it is understood. #ut not 5ritten. so it is open for misinterpretation Roles
and responsibilities - the responsi#ilities are not clear throughout the organisation
#onverting strateg to business ob/ectives - strategic o#ecti&es are not directly
#usiness o#ecti&es
Ris$ to delivering performance - a form of ris profiling. #ut often differs from the
reality of doing #usiness
2
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
34/79
erformance appetite - missing the understanding of the organisation's ris
appetite
erformance and ris$ effectiveness - #oards do not recei&e the right
information. so either too little or too much
%ehaviour - disincenti&es e9ist 5hich lead employees to #eha&e in a non-functional
manner3
28
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
35/79
3 Research methodolog
/ostly ?ualitati&e research has #een done3 7istorical data has #een collected #y doingdestop research. as there are a lot of different sources discussing the topic of internal
control3 The field research that 5as done for the report included a sur&ey and inter&ie5s3
3.1 Research design
The research definitely needed to #egin 5ith researching the #acground. different theories
and earlier studies3 This helped to formulate clearly 5hat needs to #e found out from the
sur&ey and inter&ie5s. and therefore ena#led creating the sur&ey and the inter&ie5
frame5or3 First. the ;e#ro#ol sur&ey 5as de&eloped3 The sample selection. so for 5hom
the ?uestionnaire 5ould #e sent to. 5as collected #y contacting the Big Four auditing
companies #y email. and simply asing for suita#le employees' contact information3 It 5as
determined that the respondents should ha&e relati&e no5ledge on internal control. in order
to gi&e insightful ans5ers to the sur&ey3 "fter going through the ?uestionnaire ans5ers and
doing an initial analysis. the research process could continue to the inter&ie5s3 The same four
auditing companies 5ere contacted. after 5hich specific dates 5ith the companies and the
inter&ie5ees could #e agreed upon3 The ne9t step 5as to collect the rele&ant data from the
inter&ie5 records and analy1e it3 Finally conclusions can #e made and a discussion on some
possi#le de&elopment suggestions *figure 3+
Figure 3 Image of research design
2(
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
36/79
3.2 Research process
The research process is di&ided into t5o main parts. #eginning 5ith the sur&ey and then
proceeding to the inter&ie5s3 The actual research process #egan during spring 2!2 and
continued to the #eginning of 2!2 autumn3 The follo5ing chapters 5ill descri#e the
processes in more detail3
3.2.1 urve
The sur&ey on internal control and fraud 5as sent to !( persons 5oring in the Big Four
auditing companies >/. 0rnst & Goung. Deloitte and rice5aterhouseCoopers3 The
sample group represents managers and employees. 5ho ha&e a relati&ely high no5ledge
on internal control3 "nd therefore. should #e a#le to ans5er the sur&ey 5ith deeper
understanding and no5ledge3 The sample selection too place #y first contacting each
company #y email. and in?uiring for possi#le candidates to respond to the sur&ey3 The
initial contact persons from the companies 5ere found from the organisations' Finnish
5e#-pages. and selected #ased on their positions either employees or managers 5oring
5ith ris management and or internal auditing3 The four organisations each pro&ided one
to fi&e possi#le respondents to ans5er the sur&ey3
The sur&ey 5as pu#lished on the !th of /ay 2!2 and sent to the sample group &ia
;e#ropol. 5hich uses emails pro&iding a lin to the sur&ey *attachment !+3 During a one-
month period. despite fi&e reminder emails. only si9 replies for the sur&ey 5ere recei&ed3
7alf of the respondents 5ere senior managers and the rest included a pu#lic accountant.
director and an o5nerpartner3 Due to the lo5 ans5er rate. no &alid conclusions or
generali1ations can #e made only #ased on the sur&ey3 7o5e&er. the ans5ers do gi&e some
direction for the research. and a good source of #acground information for the inter&ie5s
discussed in the ne9t chapter3
3.2.2 Intervie's
The inter&ie5 frame5or 5as de&eloped after collecting the data from the sur&ey ans5ers.
in the late "ugust 2!23 The inter&ie5 ?uestions 5ere de&eloped to gi&e more@
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
37/79
depth and detail to the research. #y eeping the sur&ey results as a #aseline. 5ere could #e
#uilt on3 During Septem#er 2!2 three face-to-face inter&ie5s 5ere conducted3 Due to
pri&acy reasons. the inter&ie5ees 5ill stay anonymous and from here on5ards referred to asInter&ie5ee !. Inter&ie5ee 2. and Inter&ie5ee @3
The most appropriate approach 5as to conduct thematic inter&ie5s3 " thematic inter&ie5.
according to 7irsar&i & 7urme *2. A+. includes ?uestions. determined #y the
inter&ie5er. 5hich ha&e #een formulated prior to the inter&ie53 7o5e&er. the actual
inter&ie5 is freer and more fluent than a structured inter&ie54 as the ?uestions do not need
to follo5 a certain order. and the ans5ers cannot really #e strictly categori1ed into any predetermined options. and therefore the inter&ie5 resem#les a con&ersation3 " thematic
inter&ie5 taes into consideration &ery essential issues. such as the inter&ie5ee's 5ay of
interpreting topics and the focus that they #ring to the different issues3 It can #e said that
the thematic inter&ie5 approach gi&es the inter&ie5ee a &oice3 *7irsar&i & 7urme 2.
A3+
The initial plan 5as that the inter&ie5ees 5ould only include representati&es from the same
Big Four auditing and consulting companies. 5ho had responded to the sur&ey3 7o5e&er. a
good e9ample of a recent fraud case came across. and an opportunity to inter&ie5 the
company's financial manager a#out it3 Therefore the inter&ie5s 5ere conducted as follo5s
t5o inter&ie5s 5ith representati&es from the Big Four and a third inter&ie5. 5hich 5as to
represent a company case of e9perienced financial fraud3 The same inter&ie5 frame5or
5as used in all of the inter&ie5s *attachment 2+3 "ll of the inter&ie5s too place in the
companies' 7elsini offices. and their durations &aried from @ to $ minutes3
@!
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
38/79
4 Data collection
The primary data has #een collected #y a sur&ey and inter&ie5s3 " ;e#ropol sur&ey and athematic inter&ie5 frame5or ha&e #een the tools used for collecting the data3 "s an
addition to the sur&ey. the inter&ie5s gi&e a deeper insight and personal ans5ers. and
therefore pro&ide rele&ant findings concerning the topic3
4.1 urve
To ha&e some structure. the sur&ey 5as di&ided into four sections. #eginning 5ith a fe5
?uestions on the #acground of the ans5erers3 "ll of the respondents ha&e more than fi&e
years of e9periences in the field of financial auditing and fi&e out of the si9 had ten or more
years of e9perience3 8sing a ,iert scale from one to fi&e. one representing poor and fi&e
e9cellent. the respondents graded their o5n no5ledge on internal control 5ith an a&erage
of A3$3 Based on the a#o&e information. it can #e said that the data collected from the
sur&ey is ans5ered 5ith e9perience and therefore is relia#le3
4.1.1 Roles6 responsibilities and decisionma$ing
The actual first part of the sur&ey included ?uestions on roles. responsi#ilities and decision-
maing3 "ll of the respondents 5ere 5ell or &ery 5ell a5are of their o5n role and
responsi#ilities in their company3 7o5e&er. it seems that in most of the cases. no concrete
responsi#ilities are 5ritten to the employees' o# descriptions3 0ither they ha&e #een 5ritten
in general le&el or then there e9ists only proect specific 5ritten o#ecti&es and tass3 ;hen
asing a#out. ho5 often does the respondents' responsi#ilities re?uire only their decision-
maing. it is clear that most of the respondents are higher-le&el managers. as this le&el
decision-maing is re?uired often or e&en daily3 0&en though it seems o#&ious that the
leader. or the person in the position of a manager. is re?uired and e9pected to mae
decisions solely. in terms of internal control it can. ho5e&er. #e ?uestiona#le3
32
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
39/79
4.1.2 #ontrolling the compan #urrent internal control sstem
The timing of implementing internal control systems differs among the four companies. #ut
it seems that policies and guidelines defining aspects of internal control ha&e e9isted from
the start3 "ccording to one of the respondents. the most recent methodology they apply is
a#out 2-@ years old3 "nd as according to most of the guidelines on internal control. this is
under continuous de&elopment to ensure that they also apply the rele&ant guiding principles
in an efficient and effecti&e manner3 "nother respondent ans5ered that their company
implemented their system in 23 These t5o ans5ers 5ould suggest that in the past fe5
years the topic of internal control has #een #rought up again3
To ha&e an effecti&e internal control *IC+ system. the o#ecti&es of the system need to #e
clear and specified3 From the sur&ey 5e can see ho5 companies' IC o#ecti&es &ary from
general to more specific3 "ccording to respondents. their IC o#ecti&es include
compliance. reputational ris management. integrity. financial reporting ensure
compliance 5ith internal policies and procedures. ensure that #rand reputation
is not harmed
1. reaching of o#ecti&es and maing sure strategy is implemented. 23 management of
riss related to the #usiness. @3 securing that la5s and regulations are complied 5ith
protect the firm and its #rand from the riss that arise in its professional practice to
assure that the riss relating lia#ilities are systematically and 5ell managed ensuring
achie&ement of o#ecti&es and 5ith regards to client 5or that the ?uality and integrity
in e&erything 5e do is not compromised and that 5e apply ethical considerations in all
our decisions and actions3
Based on these &ery thorough ans5ers to this ?uestion. it seems the o#ecti&es of the
internal control are clearly defined and understood #y the respondents3
@@
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
40/79
"ccording to the theory. ris management and internal control should #e directed.
coordinated and monitored #y the #oard3 Euestions nine and ten 5here to find out. 5ho in
practice is in charge of these ris management and internal control operations3 0&enthough the ?uestions are ased separately. the ans5ers seem to repeat their sel&es3 "s a
summary. management and the Board of Directors seem to #e the ones ultimately in
charge3 They are the ones responsi#le for implementing a proper system of internal
control. and the management is then more in charge of ensuring that the system is put into
effect3 7o5e&er. in #oth cases one respondent adds that Hall personnelH is in charge3 This
of course is something that one should also #ear in mind that e&en though the instructions
come from the top. e&eryone is personally in charge of their o5n #eha&ior3
"ll of the respondents 5ere a5are of the nature and e9tent of the riss facing their
organi1ation3 This. according to the guidelines represented #y >/. is one of the first
points that mae an internal control system effecti&e3 This ?uestion and e9amples of riss
5ere also ased during the inter&ie5s. so this 5ill later on #e discussed in more detail3
The o#ecti&ity of an internal controller plays a significant role 5hen it comes to monitoring
and assessing the effecti&eness of the controls *lader. 73 2A "pr 2!2+3 Therefore.
?uestion !2 from the sur&ey ass specifically a#out the internal controller. and 5hom he or
she 5ors for. i3e3 is he an employee from the organi1ations payroll or hired out-side the
company3 The ans5ers &aried a lot3 Three responded 5ith not ha&ing such a specific role at
all. t5o said that the person is hired internally and one responded #y ha&ing #oth3
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
41/79
Internal audits. according to @ $ of the respondents. are held annually3
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
42/79
"s discussed in chapter 23! people conducting fraud can #e o#ser&ed or analy1ed through
the fraud triangle3 For an ordinary person to commit fraud. there needs to #e the three
elements of moti&ation. rationali1ation and opportunity in place3 The internal control
system should #e the procedures. 5hich e9ist in order to pre&ent the element of opportunity
to tae place in this e?uation3 Therefore it 5as rele&ant to add this ?uestion in the sur&ey3
"ccording to the respondents. it seems the opportunities to conduct fraud are the same for
managers and employees3 %one of the respondents ans5ered that no opportunities 5ould
e9ist3 7o5e&er. $K replied that for #oth cases. management and employee. the
opportunities for committing fraud are #elo5 moderate3 This suggests that fraud is
something that can #e done4 ho5e&er the systems are controlled in such that not many
opportunities e9ist3
4.1.3 %oard meetings and relationships
"ccording to most of the respondents. the #oard re&ie5s their company's ris management
and ris analysis annually3 7o5e&er. for 5hat it comes to the actual internal control
system. most of the respondents *))K+ 5ere not a5are of ho5 often this is done3
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
43/79
#ased statement concerning the employee's no5ledge on the rele&ant guiding
principles related to client and staeholder relationships3 "ccording to the same
respondent. all employees ha&e the responsi#ility to apply related principles 5hendealing 5ith clients and other staeholders3
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
44/79
Ta#le 23
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
45/79
Intervie'ed • client riss • continuous re&ie5s and honestfor client engagements • often starts small
• monitoring from In- and escalatesdia • e9ample situation
•follo5ing internal money trou#le +control processes a opportunity "
part of employee re- fraud
muneration
• ris and reputa- • code of ethics. ethical • 5ored 5ith fraudtion manage- instructions & inde- cases
ment pendency regulations • more damage &s3
• &alue control • regular reporting to #enefitIntervie'ee • client riss glo#al group • cases mostly relat-
• employees trained and ed to monetary2 tested on no5ledge transactions
• internal audits e&ery • companies don'tthree years. include realise the riss
?uestion #atteries re- • e9ample situationlated to the glo#al re- cost friendly loan
?uirements decisions for friend
• different ap- • a&oiding dangerous • personal e9peri- proach. as part 5oring com#inations ence of colleague
of the #usiness • controls in IT pro- committing fraudis to tae riss grams. e3g3 user ID's • fraudulent financial
•categorisation
•internal controller & transactions from
under three ti- e9ternal auditors. the company's ac-
Intervie'ee
tles4 operati&e. conduct audits pro- count to personal
reputation. and cesses & financial account
@ strategic riss statements • led to changes in
• #oard meetings & control processescontinuous de&elop- • after5ards loss ofment @ $ retrie&ed
• reporting on Hnear#yH • left colleagues 5ithsituations feelings of #etrayal
• #laming culture slo5- and disappoint-
ing the de&elopment ment
@(
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
46/79
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
47/79
4.2.1 Ris$ management
"ll of the inter&ie5ees emphasi1ed on the comprehensi&eness of their ris management3
The auditing companies #oth had reputational and ?uality issues in high importance. as
they referred to Hcomprehensi&e ?uality ris managementH and Hris and reputationH
management4 5here the ?uality or reputation is already included in their internal
terminology3 This of course seemed to #e #ecause of their delicate #usinesses. and the
re?uirements that ha&e #een set forth #y the companies' glo#al groups3 Both Inter&ie5ee !
and 2 e9plained that most of the ris management aspects are related to so-called client
riss3 The selection of customers seems to #e in #oth of these companies highly regulated
and monitored3 The companies emphasi1e in #ringing &alue to the customers. #ut at the
same time the customers should #e trust5orthy. for e9ample. 5hat if comes to financials
and the a#ility to perform payments3 8ltimately. the #rand and reputation need to #e
protected and ept in high ?uality3
The Inter&ie5ee @ had a ?uite different approach. as the #usiness differs ?uite highly from
the auditing companies3
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
48/79
outside assistance3 This is yet another reason 5hy riss are not only do5nsides. #ut also
opportunities3
Some #usiness le&el riss are mostly related to regulations. 5hich arise mainly from the
0uropean commission or other regulatory #odies3
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
49/79
independent person from the auditing company. so a person 5ho has not #een
engaged in that specific proect3
"ccording to Inter&ie5ee 2. centrali1ed instructions and guidelines on reputation and ris
management come from the group. and need to #e follo5ed 5orld 5idely in all of the
international offices3 These instructions include the code of ethics. ethical instructions. and
independence issues3 "ll of these issues need to #e reported to the higher organ regularly.
the independence 5hen 5oring 5ith customers in this #usiness is of high concern3 The
regulations also include topics on anti-corruption and money laundering3 In the
inter&ie5ees o5n unit. employees are trained to the topics mentioned a#o&e. and regularlytested on their no5ledge3
Inter&ie5ee @ loos at the topic from the operati&e riss point of &ie5. and finds that
a&oiding dangerous 5oring com#inations is one of their main tools used 5hen it comes to
internal control3 This in practice could mean. for e9ample. regulations on 5ho has the right
to accept different matters3 This can often #e part of the IT programs. for e9ample. the user
identification codes *ID's+ can #e determined so that different employees can access only
selected information3 The user ID's also allo5 the management to follo5 logs. 5here one
can see 5hat a certain employee has #een doing3 "ccording to the CF
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
50/79
engagements are also locally reported on. as reports concerning the status of ?uality and
ris management procedures are o#ligatory3 Inter&ie5ee 2 e9plains ho5 their internal
audits are done e&ery three years3 These audits include ?uestionnaire #atteries related tothe glo#al instructions3 The strictness of the compliancy 5ith the glo#al guidelines is
e&ery time higher. meaning that the company is e9pected to ha&e impro&ed for e&ery
audit3 "fter half a year from the audit. the audited company needs to report its
impro&ements regarding the compliancy 5ith the regulations3
Inter&ie5ee @ e9plains their internal audits as follo5s3 The company has a designated
internal controller. 5ho is independent and 5ors under the C0
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
51/79
%one of the three inter&ie5ed. can straightfor5ard pinpoint any possi#le failure points in
their internal control systems3 7o5e&er. an essential part of the systems is continuous
de&elopment and impro&ement3 /ore and more practical processes and automation ha&e #een included3 "nd as the &alue of the controls is understood. there is less resistance3 It
seems that in the past fe5 years a lot of companies ha&e taen #ig leaps in impro&ing their
control systems3
,egally. none of the companies are o#ligated to report on their internal control in specific3
%e&ertheless. all of these three companies do report on it in one 5ay or another3 "ccording
to Inter&ie5ee !. they are re?uired to report to their India office. 5hich taes care ofmonitoring their processes3 7o5e&er. he adds they could #e more transparent a#out their
internal control procedures. as especially clients often as a#out ho5 riss are managed
5ithin their organisation3 Inter&ie5ee 2 can only say a#out the Sar#anes-/
*!(((. 2$+. the communication and philosophy on ris management as 5ell as internal
control should come from the #oard3 Therefore the inter&ie5s also touched the topics of
communication and organisational philosophy as 5ell as culture3 "ccording to Inter&ie5ee
!. their ?uality ris management *E=/+ co&ers the communication and reasoning on 5hy
certain procedures are done and 5hy they are important4 this is done #y pro&iding a lot of
training material to the employees3 Inter&ie5ee 2 e9plains ho5 a part of their
communication methods includes an 44
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
52/79
annually conducted 5e#-#ased sur&ey regarding the independency of engagements. plus
some compulsory e-learning on ethical issues is re?uired3 The depth of the independency
?uestionnaire and the re?uired learning &ary #ased on the employee's position4 there arehigher re?uirements for the management3 These ans5ers are then reported to the head of
the glo#al organisation3 For 5hat it comes to attitudes. many seem to consider the sur&eys
?uite hea&y and long. #ut understand the importance of them3
In Inter&ie5ee @'s company a ris management plan is updated and pu#lished e&ery year3
/ore detailed ris management education is gi&en for all the super&isors. 5ho should thencommunicate it and the philosophy #ehind it to the rest of the employees3 Currently an
issues under discussion. is 5hich ind of realised riss near#y situations. should #e
reported on. and to 5hom and until 5hat le&el3 The aim 5ould #e that e&erything should #e
reported on. in order to discuss and impro&e the control processes3 The difficulty seems to
come 5ith the optimi1ation. as not e&erything can #e determined in money it maes it hard
to descri#e 5hat ind of issues are rele&ant to report on3 For e9ample. it is difficult to gi&e
monetary &alue for reputation. #ut the riss related to it can create tremendous loss3
For 5hat it comes to the general &ie5 on internal control among the employees. the
inter&ie5ees had ?uite similar ans5ers3 eople are 5ell a5are of the importance and
understand 5hy things are done as they are3 Some negati&e factors relate to the
#ureaucracy often re?uired to fulfil the processes3 Inter&ie5ee ! #rings an interesting fact
a#out their processes related to internal control a part of their remuneration program
in&ol&es the fact of ho5 5ell the ?uality and ris management ha&e #een carried out3 In
other 5ords. follo5ing and reporting on the E=/ is a re?uirement for a #onus4 if not
doing 5ell in these aspects. the employee does not recei&e a #onus3 Inter&ie5ee @ refers to
their corporate culture as careful and responsi#le3 The #ureaucracy and stiffness comes
across 5ith some IT programs and systems3 0mployees sometimes feel these different
controlling methods are often not easy to operate 5ith and they can slo5 do5n the
processes3
A$
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
53/79
The final ?uestion of the inter&ie5s 5as is there a need for an internal control system in
e&ery company. and or could there #e any negati&e factors of ha&ing an internal control
system6 "ll of the inter&ie5ees agreed that an internal control system should #e a part ofe&ery company's ris management3 7o5e&er. the e9tent of the control system should suit
the organisational culture and #e in proportion 5ith the si1e of the company3 For e9ample.
#oth Inter&ie5ee ! and 2 5ould consider the 8S S
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
54/79
Inter&ie5ee @ told in detail a#out a fraud situation his company had e9perienced recently3
The fraud 5as one of the most common types of corporate fraud misappropriation of
assets3 The misappropriation of assets continued for one year. 5ith #uilding to a monetary&alue of around @ $ in total3 The employee 5as a#le to transfer money. intended for
paying the company's #ills. to her o5n account and also to some other account registered
under a Hho##y clu#H3 /onthly the transferred money 5as only around one thousand to up
to fi&e thousand 0uros at a time3 The employee had 5ored in the company for @ years.
#ut something happened during the last year3 There might ha&e #een some personal issues
in the #acground. as according to the inter&ie5ee. the employee had acted strangely for the
last one year. #efore gotten caught3 During that specific year. the actual team leader. under5hom the employee 5ho conducted the fraud had 5ored for. 5as on her maternity lea&e3
This team leader noticed the fraudulent transactions. after she came #ac from her lea&e4
she first 5ondered 5hy some transactions had #een made dou#le. and 5hy some of the
records seemed unclear3 The employee 5as a#le to go around and e9plain some of the
records. #ut finally the person got caught of the 5rongdoings 5hen a customer called and
ased a#out a missing payment that had #een due3 This led to deeper in&estigations. 5hich
re&ealed that the employee indeed had fiddled 5ith the systems and changed some of thecustomers' the #an account information to her o5n account3
The employee got caught on a Tuesday and finally. after 5aterproof e&idence. fired 5ithin
a 5ee3 The final criminal &erdict is yet to #e announced. #ut the monetary losses ha&e
#een retrie&ed3 "s a conse?uence after this case there ha&e #een a lot of changes in the
company's IT processes. settings ha&e especially #een changed so that the person 5ho is
a#le to change the account num#ers. is a different person 5ho fillsin the actual monetary
transactions3 In other 5ords. more #ureaucracy and controls ha&e #een added to the
processes3
In addition to 5hat ha&e #een mentioned. the 5hole situation had a huge effect on the other
employees as 5ell. as it #rought up feelings of disappointment. #etrayal and shoc.
especially as the person had #een a long-lime trusted employee3 To tacle all the4%
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
55/79
personal issues among the colleagues. the company organised a group discussion. plus
personal discussions 5ith a psychiatrist. in order for people to get past the shoc and
continue 5or3 %e&ertheless. the fraud case seemed to #ring dou#t and distrust among therest of the employees3
%one of the inter&ie5ees 5ere a#le to pinpoint some clear reason for people to commit
financial fraud3 "ccording to Inter&ie5ee ! the so-called fraudulent #eha&iour often starts
small and then later on gro5s3 The specific employee might #e e9periencing financial
trou#le and then if an opportunity comes along. the moti&e and reasoning comes easily as
5ell3 Inter&ie5ee 2 ga&e an e9ample of a situation 5here the person committing the fraud.did not actually #enefit anything. instead he 5as ust helping a friend3 In this e9ample of
fraud. the employee 5ored in the financial sector and due to his position. he 5as a#le to
gi&e cost friendly loan decisions for friends. meaning e3g3 longer payment periods3
Inter&ie5ee @ put it simple. #y saying that Hnoone can really #e trustedH3 ossi#le reasons
often seem to come from personal issues. 5hich are ne&er too easily categorised3
A
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
56/79
& Data Results and 0nalsis
To analyse the data. collected from the ?uestionnaire and inter&ie5s. this chapter 5illdiscuss the findings related to the three in&estigati&e ?uestions3 The purpose of this analysis
is to compare the theory #ehind internal control 5ith the actual reality and practical
processes companies' use3 By doing this. some possi#le failure points might #e detected.
from 5here suggestions on ho5 to pre&ent fraud should arise3 The suggestions and possi#le
de&elopment ideas 5ill #e represented in the final part of this chapter3
&.1 anagers7 vie's on internal control
To tacle the research pro#lem. the first in&estigati&e ?uestion that needed to #e ans5ered
5as to find out 5hat are managers' &ie5s on internal control in general and in their
company3 Starting the analysis already from the ?uestionnaire ans5ers. it seems as
managers in consulting companies ha&e a good or e9cellent no5ledge in internal control3
Interpreting the ans5ers concerning the o#ecti&es of internal control. all of the respondents
had ?uite a thorough ans5er to present. gi&ing an impression that the o#ecti&es definitely
are something. 5hich are discussed and considered 5ithin the organisations3 The managers
understand the importance and necessity of the controls. as said #y Inter&ie5ee 1 the
internal control system ensures that the company o#ecti&es are reached3 Therefore it can #e
said that ha&ing an internal control system seems to #e a natural part. and some5hat a
necessity. of the organisations' operations3 The topic on o#ecti&e 5ill still #e discussed in
more detail in the follo5ing chapter. as o#ecti&e setting is also one of the ey components
5hen #uilding an effecti&e internal control system3
"ccording to a definition represented #y lader. a consultant from BD<
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
57/79
eeps employees sharp 5ith internal acti&ities3 In addition. the different control acti&ities
mae accurate. rele&ant and timely reporting possi#le3 7o5e&er. as #rought up #y the
inter&ie5ees. the e9tent of the control system should suit the organisational culture and #ein proportion 5ith the si1e of the company3 For e9ample. the use of the 8S S
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
58/79
The internal en&ironment in Inter&ie5ee @'s company still seems to need impro&ements3
The tone that comes from the management and upper le&el super&isors is clearly something
affecting the 5hole internal en&ironment. 5hich currently is not as open as it could #e3 "sreferred #y Inter&ie5ee @. the #laming culture is something that needs to #e o&ercome. in
order to open up the atmosphere3 By doing this. meaning maing the en&ironment more
open. possi#le riss 5ill #e easier to detect and the o&erall control processes could #e #etter
de&eloped and impro&ed3 %o5. as the communication channels seem to #e e9periencing
#locages. the ris management #oard might #e lacing crucial information. 5hich as a
result slo5s do5n the flo5 of continuous de&elopment3 The phenomenon of a #laming
organisational culture can #e detected from one of the most common 5eanesses inorganisations represented #y the >/'s =is /anagement Diagnostic *chapter 23$32+3 The
aspect of #eha&iour fails. 5hen disincenti&es e9ist 5hich lead employees to #eha&e in a
non-functional manner *>/ !(((. 2)+3 /oreo&er. the philosophy and setting an e9ample
should come from the #oard. management and super&isors3
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
59/79
clearly a#le to categorise the riss into internal and e9ternal3 "s discussed in chapter A323!
the riss &ary from economic do5nturn to employee no5-ho53 Inter&ie5ee @ categorised
their riss under operati&e. reputation and strategic riss3 The operational riss can further #e di&ided into e9ternal and internal3 The e9ternal riss include maret riss. credit riss and
li?uidity riss. 5hich can arise from client and counter party relations3 The internal riss
5ere more discussed in relation to the internal control. 5hich moreo&er include in-house
procedures and processes3 In all off these researched company cases. it seems that the riss
are 5ell no5n3 7o5e&er. as discussed 5ith Inter&ie5ee @ * chapter A323@+ the topic of fraud
and controls came more e9plicit after the misappropriation of assets - incident. 5hich their
department e9perienced3 This incident lead to tightening of the controls. #ut it seems that theatmosphere of openness should still #e impro&ed. in order to de&elop the procedures to #e
more efficient3 Theoretically this can #e again assessed as one of the 5eanesses under
performance and ris effecti&eness. 5here the #oard does not recei&e the right information
*chapter 23$32+ *>/ !(((. 2)+3
The ne9t t5o components represented #y C
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
60/79
Inter&ie5ee 2's case. ethical and independence issues are of most importance3 The
procedures represented #y Inter&ie5ee @ mainly include the a&oidance of dangerous
5oring com#inations3 In practice this has #een implemented for e9ample in the IT programs. #y ha&ing personal user ID's. 5ith personal settings for different employees3
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
61/79
Ta#le @3
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
62/79
rather than #laming cul-
ture - aspect of #eha&iour
(b/ective etting
resent and functioning3 • Consistency 5ith ris ap-
petite and mission
/ostly functioning. #ut • Impro&ements for per-impro&ements needed3 formance and ris effec-
ti&eness - lac of rele&ant
+vent Identification communication to the
#oard
• P not all possi#le rissare detected
Ris$ 0ssessment %" • Deeper analysis on lieli-hood and impact of riss
resent and functioning3 • ;hen to a&oid. accept.Ris$ Response reduce or share riss6
• Cost of control &s3 #enefitresent and functioning3 • Careful consideration of
all internal riss
#ontrol 0ctivities
• Balance #et5een too in-
tense controls and 5hat is
necessary- e3g3 propor-
tion 5ith the company
si1e
Information and /ostly functioning. #ut • Information flo5 should#ommunication impro&ements needed3 go across. up and do5n
/ostly functioning. #ut • Importance of local moni-onitoring open for interpretation3 to ring6
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
63/79
7o5e&er. as mentioned in chapter 23$3!. the eight components do not function identically in
all organisations3 In smaller organisations they may #e less structured and more informal.
#ut still effecti&e3 "ccording to the analysis presented in the pre&ious chapter. it seems as if
the consulting companies set an e9ample to other companies3 The theoretical components
re?uired for an effecti&e system of internal controls seemed more or less to #e in place3 The
company. represented #y Inter&ie5ee @. on the$$
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
64/79
other hand 5ould need impro&ements to its internal en&ironment. and possi#ly to its
control procedures3 ositi&ely it can #e seen that the topic of implementing. de&eloping
and updating internal control systems is currently discussed in many organisations3
To ans5er ho5 effecti&ely do the internal control systems pre&ent fraud. 5e can reflect on
5hat 5as ans5ered in the sur&eys and 5hat other conclusions can #e made #ased on the
presented data3 "s suggested in chapter A3!32. internal control plays a high role in
pre&enting fraud ho5e&er it cannot fully pre&ent it3 "lready C
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
65/79
4.&.
the top of the company3
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
66/79
Figure (3 Interrelation of components
To tae as an e9ample the company case presented #y Inter&ie5ee @. it could #e
concluded that the information and communication as 5ell as the e&ent identification
components 5ould function #etter if the internal en&ironment 5ould #e more open. and
ha&e a more accessi#le atmosphere3 ;ith an open and functioning internal en&ironment.
the information flo5 5ould #ecome more efficient. and the
communication channels could operate in all necessary directions3 The component of
e&ent identification 5ould function #etter. as if the communication channels 5ere
open. the information 5ould flo5 fluently3 Therefore help the #oard to identify e&ents.
5hich affect the achie&ements of o#ecti&es. and determine these e&ents as riss and
opportunities3
The component of monitoring seems to #e an aspect possi#ly also in need of deeper
consideration3 0&en though. the research findings do not suggest that there are any negati&e
aspects in monitoring happening across #orders. companies should definitely consider the
effecti&eness and relia#ility of distant monitoring3 %o5adays. as the 5orld is full of
international organisations operating in multiple continents. a le&el of monitoring
happening across #orders is ine&ita#le3 Therefore. companies should$
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
67/79
carefully consider the implementation of internal control. and determine the organ that is
ultimately in charge of implementing and carrying-out the processes of their internal control
system3 In addition to 5hat the head?uarters. or the parent company monitors. localmonitoring of control procedures is in place3
&)
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
68/79
: #onclusions
Fraud and deception seem to #e o&erall something that a 5illing and determined person5ill find a 5ay to commit3 Therefore. it is not &alid to say that a corporate internal control
system 5ould pre&ent fraud3 %e&ertheless. internal control is something that minimi1es the
opportunity and in such it is a necessity for all companies to ha&e3 This final chapter
presents the &alidity and usefulness of the discussed results. possi#le recommendations for
future research. and finally the researcher's personal e9perience on professional
de&elopment and learning during the thesis process3
:.1 ;alidit and usefulness of results
The &alidity of the research can #e e9amined through the e9isting data on earlier research
* chapters 232 and 23A+. done #y C
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
69/79
Further research on the topic could include in&estigating the co-operation #et5een
managers. the #oard and the e9ternal auditors3 "s can #e seen in the cases of 0nron and the
,ehman Brothers. the e9ternal auditors 5ere present. #ut still they did not detect thefraudulent reporting. or if they did. they did not act on it3 0&en though the employee le&el
procedures seem to #e highly emphasised in the theoretical models of internal control. could
or should there #e something similar pro&ided for the top of the company6
The research also pro&ides ne5 and interesting learning for fello5 students and educators3
,ining ethical issues 5ith finance #rings out important factors. 5hich too often are left outof the curriculum3 The topic of financial fraud is not easy to tacle. #ut creating a5areness
of the conse?uences and the seriousness of it. can in the long run reduce fraud incidents. and
may#e e&en create a more trust5orthy #usiness society3 Corporate social responsi#ility and
ethical #usiness #eha&iour are something e9pected from all 7"""-70,I" international
#usiness graduates3 This thesis pro&ides good insights in regarding to the mentioned.
especially for students specialising in finance3
)32 ('n professional development and learning
During the thesis process I ha&e learned a multiple different things3 The 5hole process has
taen a #it o&er a year. and for me this has #een the longest period of time I ha&e e&er
focused on 5riting one piece of te9t3 /erely this has re?uired patience and a lot of thining
through3 During the 5hole process. the most difficult thing has #een to stic 5ith the
demarcated topic3 For e9ample e&ery time I ha&e 5ritten something I ha&e had to remind
myself not to go too far. despite interesting findings and facts3 But. I am grateful I started
researching this topic. as throughout the process I ha&e ept my moti&ation. and I am also
glad that I can actually present some findings on it3
Some set#acs that I e9perienced happened firstly 5ith the ;e#ropol - sur&ey. as I had
some minor technical difficulties 5ith it. and therefore pro#a#ly lost a fe5 of the
respondents' ans5ers3 In total I sent the sur&ey fi&e times. ho5e&er only si9 out of !(
people replied3 Successfully. the inter&ie5s compensated this. and I 5as a#le to get)!
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
70/79
interesting ans5ers3 The highest learning pro#a#ly happened 5ith contacting the
different companies and conducting the inter&ie5s3
62
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
71/79
References
"altola. J3 & alli. =3 2!3 Iunoita tutimusmetodeihin II3 %aoulmia aloittele&alle
tutialle tutimusen teoreettisiin lahtoohtiin a analyysimenetelmiin3 S-ustanus3
Jy&asyla3
Beasley. /3. Carcello.J3. 7ermanson. D3 & %eal. T3 2!3 Fraudulent Financial =eporting
!((-23 "n "nalysis on 83S3 u#lic Companies3 8=,
http 5553coso3org documents C
-
8/19/2019 Saarni Jenna.word
72/79
Freifeld. >3 & Sandler. ,3 22 Decem#er 2!3 Bloom#erg %e5s3 Cuomo Sues 0rnst &
Goung for "ssisting ,ehman Brothers in H=epo !$' Fraud3 8=,
http 5553#loom#erg3com ne5s2!-!2-2! ne5-yor-s-cuomo-said-to-planfraud-
suit-against-lehman-s-accounting-firm3html3 "ccessed 2( Jan 2!23
lader. 73 2A "pr 2!23 Sisa