Uni t ed E nerg y P a k is ta n
Lifting Plan
Page 1 of 9
DATE: 14-10-2013 REFERENCE: _______________.
Location: Sheikhano-1
Lifting Description:
Loading of Slug Catcher
Lifting Planned by:
Name: Musawir Abbas (JSL)
Signature: ________________ ___ ________.
Certification: NSL
Lifting Executed by:
NAME POSITION
Safety Watch Supervisor
______________ Banksman
______________ Cr. Operator / Driver
_______________ Riggers 02 No.
Uni t ed E nerg y P a k is ta n
Lifting Plan
Page 2 of 9
EQUIPMENT CHECKLIST – LIFTING APPLIANCES AND ACCESSORIES
MOBILE CRANE PRE-USE INSPECTION CHECK LIST Date: _______________
Make/Model: Type/Capacity:
Crane Operator: Reg. No.:
Owner/Contractor: JSL
STATUS CODE: - Satisfactory; X – Unsatisfactory; R – See Remarks; N/A – Not Applicable
ITEM CODE REMARKS
Valid Third party certification Opt./Driver's License & Certificate Rigger’s certificate Battery installation & Terminals Spark/Flame Arrester on ExhaustBrakes Positive swing lock Hydraulic Reservoir Hydraulic Hoses & Fittings Outriggers & Float Pads Level Indicator Tire Condition & Pressure Wheel Lugs Hooks and Hook Block Pulley and Sheaves Boom & Attachments Boom Angle Indicator Lubrication/Grease or Oil Leaks Wire Rope Kinks or Breaks Wire Rope Dirt & Lube Hoist non rotating wire per manufacturers standard
Slings, belts, shackles, hook, etc. Counterweight & Torque Alarms: Reverse Swing
Limit Switches: Boom limit switch Boom angle Hoist limit switch Lowering limit switch
Load Moment Indicator
Uni t ed E nerg y P a k is ta n
Lifting Plan
Page 3 of 9
Lights (front, reverse, turn signals, cab, boom)
Seat Belt Fire Extinguishers Load Chart & Range Diagram Hand Signal Chart Electrical wiring & fittings Cabin windshield & housekeeping Windshield Wiper GAUGES: Oil, Fuel, Amp Lights & Horn Gearshift Control Foot & Parking Brakes Swing Brake Control Lever Linkage Throttle Linkage Engine RPM / vibration
JSL
OBSERVATIONS & REMARKS:
Musawir Abbas (JSL) ___________________ __________________ Prepared by: JSL Reviewed by: UEP Rep. Approved by: UEP Date: 14-10-2013 Date: Date:
Uni t ed E nerg y P a k is ta n
Lifting Plan
Page 4 of 9
APPENDIX – 3: RISK ASSESSMENT FORM FOR RIGGING & LIFTING OPERATIONS
Risk Assessment No.____________ The object of the risk assessment is to identify and eliminate any hazards in the lifting operation, define the level of difficulty of the task and determine the skill level of the personnel required to perform that particular activity safely. This document will also highlight any need for further training.
Category of lifting operation:
Complicated
Person responsible for Lifting Operation (Performing Authority)
Supervisor
Personnel to be involved:
Safety Watch Supervisor / Banksman / Riggers / Crane Operator / Driver / Helper (lookout)
Date of Lift Please complete the result table below once the relevant parts of the assessment have been completed.
Result of assessment: (tick appropriate box) 1 Stop! - Further engineering input required. 2 Caution! - Rigging Personnel must perform operation. 3 Go - Proceed with lifting operation.
If the lift is to proceed, please enter in the box below, any special instructions and/ or safety measures to be taken:
Name: Musawir Abbas (JSL) Job Title: Supervisor Date: 14-10-2013
Once the lift has been safely completed, please note in the box below any problems encountered and how they were overcome, also any suggestion for doing the lift more efficiently/ safely.
Job Completion Feedback: Name: Position: Date:
Uni t ed E nerg y P a k is ta n
Lifting Plan
Page 5 of 9
LIFT CATEGORISATION ASSESSMENT PART 1 ROUTINE LIFTING OPERATIONS CHECKLIST
Six Basic Questions Yes No 1 Has this lifting operation been performed before? 2 Is there a documented lifting plan and lifting operation risk assessment in place?
3 Are you experience with all the lifting equipment/gear to be used?
4 Has the load been checked and made ready for lifting (e.g. Hold down bolts released)?
5 Have you the experience to lift a load of this weight? 6 Is the lift in an area free from obstructions and other possible hazards?
If the answer to any of the above is “No”, go to Part 2 of the Lifting Operation Assessment Procedure.
If the answer to all questions above is “yes” proceed with the routine lifting operation in accordance with the relevant lifting plan and/or risk assessment. Assessment Part 1 performed by: Musawir Abbas (JSL) Job Title: Supervisor Date: 14-10-2013
Uni t ed E nerg y P a k is ta n
Lifting Plan
Page 6 of 9
LIFT CATEGORISATION ASSESSMENT PART 2 SIMPLE LIFTING OPERATIONS CHECKLIST
Questions Yes No1 Is the lifting operation to be undertaken by a single lifting appliance only? 2 Do you know the weight of the load and does the lifting operation appear to be straightforward?
3 Is the load heavier than you normally handle, do you have the relevant permission and/or permit?
4 Is there a crane or certified support steelwork (eg runway beam or lifting eye) directly above the load?
N/A
5 Does the load have certified lifting points (lifting eyes/collar eyebolts, etc) fitted and if not, can slings be wrapped around easily (e.g., no sharp edges, load not fragile, etc)
6 Is there ample headroom for the lifting appliance and slings? 7 Is the lift stable (e.g. center of gravity below lifting points)? 8 Is the lift balanced (e.g., center of gravity in the middle) or fitted with special slings to compensate?
9 Is the load free to be lifted (e.g. all hold-down bolts removed, not jammed, etc)?
10 Is the removal route clear of any obstructions? 11 Can the removal (lift, transfer & landing) be performed without cross- hauling?
12 Is there a suitable laydown area and does the load come within the allowable load bearing capacity of the ground/surface?
13 Are you experienced in using all the lifting equipment/gear involved? If the answer to any of the above is “NO” go to Part 3 of the Lifting Operation Assessment Procedure. If you can answer “yes” to all the above, proceed with the lift as per the UEP requirements for simple lifts. Assessment Part 2 performed by: Musawir Abbas (JSL) Job title: Supervisor Date: 14-10-2013 Note to Supervisors: If you can give solutions to the above negatives to allow the lift to proceed safely, write the instructions in the box below and if you cannot supply a solution, seek guidance form the appropriate competent person (s).
Solutions to overcome the above problems:
Uni t ed E nerg y P a k is ta n
Lifting Plan
Page 7 of 9
LIFT CATEGORISATION ASSESSMENT PART 3 COMPLICATED LIFTING OPERATIONS CHECKLIST Complicated lifting operations must be carried out by qualified Riggers, or personnel with similar qualifications and skills in dealing with awkward loads.
Identified Hazard Yes No 1 Load has Center of Gravity above the lifting points or a high CofG
2 Load has an offset Center of Gravity 3 Load has to be cross-hauled or restrained 4 Load does not have specific lifting attachments
5 Load is fragile 6 Load has a large surface area which may act as a sail
7 Load requires multiple sets of rigging or multiple lifting appliances
8 Load has to be rotated (overturned) 9 Load is equal to or less than 2 tonnes and non-certified steel structural support members are to be used in the lifting operation
If you answer “Yes” to any of the above, go to Part 4 of the Lifting Operations Assessment Procedure
If you have answered “No” to all of the above, proceed with the lift as per the UEP requirements for complicated lifts Assessment Part 3 performed by: Musawir Abbas (JSL) Job title: Supervisor Date: 14-10-2013 Approved/Endorsed by ……………………………………………………………… Note to Supervisors: if you have the experience and can advise personnel involved in the lifting operation how deal with the complication, allow the lifting operation to proceed but only under your guidance. However, if you decide that the lifting operation is outwith the scope of your competence, please indicate the reasons applicable in the table in Part 4 – Complex Lifts below before passing on to the nominated Technical Authority for lifting operations on the site Any comments from Lifting Coordinator of UEP: __________________________________
Uni t ed E nerg y P a k is ta n
Lifting Plan
Page 8 of 9
LIFT CATEGORISATION ASSESSMENT PART 4 COMPLEX LIFTING OPERATIONS CHECKLIST Lifting operations or conditions, which would merit additional engineering input.
Reasons for Requesting Engineering Input Tick Box where Applicable
1 The operation involves lifting people 2 The load will be traveled over unprotected process plant/machinery
3 The load is extremely heavy and/or involves the use of non-certified steel structural support members for loads greater than 2 tonnes
4 The load is very valuable 5 The lift is in a confined space 6 The lift is in an area with very restricted headroom 7 Other reason
Lifting Plan/Method Statement and Risk Assessment Part 4 performed by: Musawir Abbas (JSL) Job Title: Supervisor Date: 14-10-2013 Approved/Endorsed by (delete as applicable) ……………………………………… Date ………………………………………………………………………………………..
Uni t ed E nerg y P a k is ta n
Lifting Plan
Page 9 of 9
Appendix – 4: LIFTING OPERATION PLAN
Description of Load:
Ref. No:
Brief Description of Lifting Operation (including location):
Possible Considerations (not exhaustive) – tick if relevant and address each point in “step-by-step” plan section 1. Weight of load unknown …….. 7. No dedicated rigging …... 13. Lifting thru substantial heights .. 2. High center of gravity ………... 8. Load has sharp edges ….. 14. Dynamic factors involved ……… 3. Unstable load ……….……… 9. Extremely heavy load….. 15. Hazards to personnel ……….. 4. Awkward size / shape ….….. 10. No lift point above load ….. 16. Communications …………….. 5. Fragile load …………………… 11. Restricted headroom ….. 17. Tag lines needed ……………. 6. No dedicated lift points …… 12. Confined work area …. 18. Poor light conditions ……………
Step by step plan of lifting operation (include any site clearance if relevant and sketches as applicable):
(if required use reverse side of this sheet for additional information / sketches etc.)
Route to be traveled & laydown area:1. Has route to be traveled been selected and cleared of obstructions? yes n/a 2. Is laydown/landing area adequate in both size and load bearing capacity? yes n/a 3. Is suitable packing available for protection of load/slings while landing the load (e.g. timber)? yes n/a 4. Has the area been cordoned off to prevent access to unauthorized personnel? yes n/a 5. Have you confirmed that the laydown area is within the operating radius of the crane? yes n/a 6. Will the banksman always be visible to the crane operator or has an alternate method of communication (e.g. radios) been established? yes n/a 7. Have weather conditions been considered for their effect on the safety of the lifting operation yes n/a
Levels of personnel competence and manning levels required
Banksman/Signalman Qty: Riggers Qty:
Rigging Supervisor Qty: other Qty: S. watch
List of Rigging Equipment and Accessories used: (Give complete specs including make, model, type, capacity, etc. and attach load charts and range diagrams for cranes). (Attach sheets): Note: Lifting gear shall be provided by UEP. Levels of Rigging & Lifting Risk Assessment performed: (Attach copy)
1. Lift Categorization Assessment Part:
2. Task Risk Assessment Level:
3. Engineering Study
Ensure all the lifting equipment and accessories are certified and have been inspected before use.
Lifting operation planned by: Date:
Job title: Supervisor Signature: