Download - Quality Undergraduate Education Geoffrey Habron MSU Sociology Department Retreat May 10, 2006
Quality Undergraduate Education
Geoffrey Habron
MSU Sociology Department Retreat May 10, 2006
Outline
• Office of Faculty and Organizational Development Resources
• What is quality education?
• A concrete assessment example
But first a concern…
“That's a fine idea in practice, but it will never work in theory.” – Harry Perlstadt
A Theoretical Framework for Change: Choices within Constraints
“The new institutionalism that is the focus of this essay is about the body. Its fundamental assertion is that actors pursue their interests by making choices within constraints. This assertion can be expanded to identify three characteristic elements of the theory. First, it holds that actors are boundedly rational in the sense that they pursue a broad set of self interests, but with limited knowledge and cognitive capacity. Second, institutions are defined as the rules, combined with their enforcement mechanisms, that constrain the choices of actors. These rules include the laws of states, the policies of organizations, and the norms of social groups. Third, institutions ideally constrain actors such that their best choices are consistent with the collective good, enabling, for example, mutually profitable exchange between actors.” (Ingram and Clay 2000:525-526)
Ingram, P. And K. Clay. 2000. The choice-within-constraints new institutionalism and implications for sociology. Annual Review Of Sociology 2000. 26:525–46
Office of Faculty and Organizational Development –
Choices…• Dr. Patty Payette• What is quality education? How do we know?
– Literature; research; SoTL
• Resources provided– Seminars/workshops– Fellowships– Assessments– Web links
• Suggestions for retreat follow-up
Quality Education: Levels of Analysis
• General Undergraduate Education
• Sociological Education (ASA)
• MSU Boldness by Design
• MSU Department of Sociology
• Course level (SOC 361)Second, institutions are defined as the rules, combined with their enforcement mechanisms, that constrain the choices of actors. These rules include the laws of states, the policies of organizations, and the norms of social groups. (Ingram and Clay 2000:525-526)
I. General
7 Principles of Undergraduate Education
• Encourage student-faculty contact;• Encourage cooperation among students;• Encourage active learning;• Give prompt feedback;• Emphasize time on task;• Communicate high expectations; and• Respect diverse talents and ways of
learning. Chickering, A. and Z. Gamson. Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education.' American Association for Higher Education, 1986.
http://honolulu.hawaii.edu/intranet/committees/FacDevCom/guidebk/teachtip/7princip.htm
http://www.byu.edu/fc/pages/tchlrnpages/7princip.html
Backward Design
• Stage 1: Identify desired outcomes and results.
• Stage 2: Determine what constitutes acceptable evidence of competency in the outcomes and results (assessment).
• Stage 3: Plan instructional strategies and learning experiences that bring students to these competency levels.
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J.(1998). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
http://pixel.fhda.edu/id/six_facets.html
http://www.ubdexchange.org/resources.html
II. Sociology
Meeting the Challenge of Teaching Sociology in the
Twenty-First Century
Report of the Task Force on the Undergraduate Major:
Liberal Learning and the Sociology Major .
American Sociological Association. January 2005.
<http://www.asanet.org/governance/LiberalLearningUpdate.pdf>
• There is a wealth of research, theory, and practical ideas on important approaches to teaching and learning in higher education should inform discussions about, and choices made for, the sociology major and curricular or pedagogical reforms. Three of these are briefly discussed here:– learning-centered instruction, – deep learning, and – best practices.
Pg. 44
Student-centered Learning (ASA)
• With such an approach, the impact on student learning is the key variable in all course, department, and institutional decisions. From this perspective, we must consider, for example, student variables and diversity, the impact of the environment on learning, learning styles, and the scaffolding for learning. Covering the content is not the important objective in this paradigm; rather, it is nurturing student learning.
Pg. 44
Deep Learning (ASA)• Relates previous knowledge to new knowledge;• Relates knowledge from different courses;• Relates theoretical ideas to everyday experience;• Relates and distinguishes evidence and
argument;• Organizes and structures content into a coherent
whole; and• Emphasis is internal, from within the student• Deep learning clearly implies increasing
integration among topics, courses, and out-of-class experiences.
Pg. 44
Pop Culture View of Student College Experience Closer to Fine – Indigo Girls
I went to the doctor, I went to the mountainsI looked to the children, I drank from the fountainThere's more than one answer to these questionspointing me in crooked lineThe less I seek my source for some definitiveThe closer I am to fine. I went to see the doctor of philosophyWith a poster of Rasputin and a beard down to his kneeHe never did marry or see a B-grade movieHe graded my performance, he said he could see through meI spent four years prostrate to the higher mind, got my paperAnd I was free.
http://www.indigogirls.com/lyrics/byalbum/indigo.html
Best Practices
• Encourage student-faculty contact;• Encourage cooperation among students;• Encourage active learning;• Give prompt feedback;• Emphasize time on task;• Communicate high expectations; and• Respect diverse talents and ways of learning.
Pg. 45
Refers to 7 principles of undergraduate learning
ASA Senior Survey Findings
• Some ideas for potential outcomes and assessment indicators
Overall Satisfaction with Outcomes of Sociology Programs% Very satisfied
• Note link to best practices
Michigan State
(n=14)
Doctoral Programs(n= 860)
Overall satisfaction with experiences
57.1 69.0
Access to necessary technology
85.7 68.5
Ease in seeing faculty outside class*
50.0 63.4
Quality of teaching* 42.9 60.9
Getting courses needed to graduate
50.0 60.0
Interaction with fellow majors*
28.6 52.8
Undergraduate advising 28.6 46.9
Career advising 28.6 13.4
Graduate school advising 7.1 8.7
Ten learning activities participated in by Graduating Sociology Majors
% Participating as part of Sociology Major
Michigan State
(n=14)
Doctoral Programs(n= 860)
How to work in a group 21.4 32.0
Internship 21.4 29.0
Community Political Volunteer
21.4 26.4
Service Learning 14.3 24.5
Sociology club [AK∆] 21.4 17.2
Career related mentor networking
14.3 16.7
Faculty mentoring 7.1 16.2
Faculty research program 7.1 13.8
Dept honors program 7.1 11.3
Prof sociology meetings 7.1 7.4
Top Eight Skills Gained by Graduating Sociology Majors% Strongly Agreeing
Michigan State
(n=14)
Doctoral Programs(n= 860)
Identify ethical issues in research
64.3 67.5
Develop evidence based arguments
78.6 65.3
Evaluate different research methods
71.4 63.9
Write report for non sociologists
50.0 63.6
Form causal hypotheses 71.4 59.6
Use computer for bib references
50.0 57.9
Interpret results of data gathering
42.9 55.6
Use statistical software SPSS SAS etc
42.9 35.9
Six Conceptual Abilities of Graduating Sociology Majors% Strongly Agreeing
Michigan State
(n=14)
Doctoral Programs(n= 860)
Basic sociological concepts
85.7 86.6
People’s experiences vary 92.9 85.2
Current sociological explanations
85.7 85.5
Society from alternative critical
100.0
80.8
Basic sociological theories/paradigms
85.7 76.2
Social Inst & impact on individuals
71.4 75.4
MSU Boldness by Design
• http://strategicpositioning.msu.edu/default.asp
Boldness Principles
• http://strategicpositioning.msu.edu/Design_Glance.asp
Enhancing the Undergraduate Experience: Task Force Recommendations
1. Enhance the first year experience; assist students in making a strong academic and social transition, and in creating appropriate expectations about their undergraduate education
2. Promote the improvement of and rewards for successful college teaching
3. Articulate, target and expand opportunities for undergraduate students to develop cultural competencies.
4. Promote and integrate more active and applied learning in undergraduate education
5. Modify the undergraduate curriculum and related policies so that our goals for undergraduate liberal learning are met
6. Enhance the physical environment in ways that support learning for the students, faculty and staff at MSU
7. Continue the review of graduate programs and graduate teaching
and the mentoring of graduate students.
G: addresses mostly choices, but few constraints
http://strategicpositioning.msu.edu/documents/BbDImperative1_002.pdf
Report of the Working Group on Improving Undergraduate Education:
Goals for Liberal Learning 1. Integrated Judgment
2. Advanced Communication Skills (both writing and speaking)
3. Cultural Competence (addressed in recommendation 2)
4. Analytical Thinking
5. Literacy in Science and Mathematics
6. Effective Citizenship
III. MSU Sociology
MSU SOC Undergraduate Mission
• Illustrate sociological perspectives
• Help students develop skills in critical thinking
• Introduce and explain strategies and methods for conducting sociological research
GH: Need to reframe in terms of outcomes and add explanation for terms e.g. critical thinking
Gold and Pyle. 2005. MSU Sociology Department assessment plan. January
MSU SOC Undergraduate Principles
• Student responsibility for learning• Active learning and research skills• Doing sociology• Team learning• Computers• Job skills• Life skills• World as a classroom• Integrate graduate and undergraduate education
Gold and Pyle. 2005. MSU Sociology Department assessment plan. January
GH: some of these seem like outcomes e.g. research skills, computers.
Next Steps
• Individual course adjustments– e.g. 7 principles, backward design
• Departmental curriculum adjustments– backward design
SOC 361 example
• Contemporary Communities
• Fall 2005
• Geoffrey Habron
• 68 studentsThird, institutions ideally constrain actors such that their best choices are consistent with the collective good, enabling, for example, mutually profitable exchange between actors.” (Ingram and Clay 2000:525-526)
SOC 361 OutcomesSOC 361 Outcomes
• Approaches to study community
• Levels of complexity
• Community Change
• Community Development
• Links to external institutions and factors
Outcome Proficiency
• Knowledge
• Comprehension
• Application
• Analysis
• Synthesis
• Evaluation
– Define, name, list– describe, explain, arrange– illustrate, demonstrate – diagram, compare, criticize– organize, propose, manage– argue, assess, defend
Portfolio15%
Field Project15%
Lecture
Weekly Assignments
15%
Exams30%
Participation15%
SOC 361 Structure
Group Project10%
Flexible 5%
Outcomes
Approaches
Complexity
Change
Development
External
Doing sociology, research skills, world as classroom
Best Practices
• Encourage student-faculty contact;• Encourage cooperation among students;• Encourage active learning;• Give prompt feedback;• Emphasize time on task;• Communicate high expectations; and• Respect diverse talents and ways of learning.
Pg. 45
(SIRS)(presentations)
(field project, presentations)
(flexible 5%, presentations)
*
*
(final feedback)
* Missing in SOC 361
Deep Learning (ASA)• Relates previous knowledge to new knowledge;• Relates knowledge from different courses;• Relates theoretical ideas to everyday experience;• Relates and distinguishes evidence and
argument;• Organizes and structures content into a coherent
whole; and• Emphasis is internal, from within the student• Deep learning clearly implies increasing
integration among topics, courses, and out-of-class experiences.
Pg. 44
Final Field Project Creativity
• Humorous look at bowling leagues
• Historical and census analysis of hometown
• Fairy tale depicting deeply personal critique of hometown
• “Bridging the gap: the connections between the restaurant community and the field of social work”
Relates previous knowledge to new knowledge
Relates and distinguishes evidence and argument
integration among topics, courses, and out-of-class experiences
Organizes and structures content into a coherent whole
Relates theoretical ideas to everyday experience
Field Project Reflections
• “It was not until I began collecting research for this field project on my own community that I truly understood how to take charge of my education outside of a classroom setting. By making use of the tools that we are all equipped with, I was able to turn my everyday observations into an educational experience” (student a)
Relates theoretical ideas to everyday experience
Field Project Reflections
• “People do not usually process or analyze the information that they gather from their observations and it is simply lost. A major concept behind learning is to be an active learner. Active learning means taking any situation and turning it into a valuable and educational experience on your own terms.” (student a)
Emphasis is internal, from within the student
Needs
• Capacity– Structural– Cultural– Capital:
• Human• Social• Financial• …
Enhancing the Undergraduate Experience: Task Force Recommendations
1. Enhance the first year experience; assist students in making a strong academic and social transition, and in creating appropriate expectations about their undergraduate education
2. Promote the improvement of and rewards for successful college teaching
3. Articulate, target and expand opportunities for undergraduate students to develop cultural competencies.
4. Promote and integrate more active and applied learning in undergraduate education
5. Modify the undergraduate curriculum and related policies so that our goals for undergraduate liberal learning are met
6. Enhance the physical environment in ways that support learning for the students, faculty and staff at MSU
7. Continue the review of graduate programs and graduate
teaching and the mentoring of graduate students.
G: addresses mostly choices, but few constraints
http://strategicpositioning.msu.edu/documents/BbDImperative1_002.pdf
Faculty Startup Costs
• Faculty– Letting go– Diligent monitoring of tension– Organization, instructions– Structure: assignment status; load; teaching style– Culture: routine, expectations, habitus– Agency: choice, decisions, motivation