Download - Quality Management . ppt - GT
![Page 1: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Quality ManagementQuality Management
““It costs a lot to produce a bad product.It costs a lot to produce a bad product.””Norman AugustineNorman Augustine
![Page 2: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Cost of quality
1. Prevention costs
2. Appraisal costs
3. Internal failure costs
4. External failure costs
5. Opportunity costs
![Page 3: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
What is quality management all about?
Try to manage all aspects of the organization in order to excel in all dimensions that are
important to “customers”
Two aspects of quality: features: more features that meet customer needs
= higher qualityfreedom from trouble: fewer defects = higher
quality
![Page 4: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
The Quality Gurus – Edward Deming
1900-1993
1986
Quality is “uniformity and dependability”
Focus on SPC and statistical tools
“14 Points” for management
PDCA method
![Page 5: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
The Quality Gurus – Joseph Juran
1904 - 2008
1951
Quality is “fitness for use”
Pareto Principle
Cost of Quality
General management approach as well as statistics
![Page 6: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
History: how did we get here…
• Deming and Juran outlined the principles of Quality Management.
• Tai-ichi Ohno applies them in Toyota Motors Corp.
• Japan has its National Quality Award (1951).
• U.S. and European firms begin to implement Quality Management programs (1980’s).
• U.S. establishes the Malcolm Baldridge National Quality Award (1987).
• Today, quality is an imperative for any business.
![Page 7: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
What does Total Quality Management encompass?
TQM is a management philosophy:
• continuous improvement
• leadership development
• partnership development
CulturalAlignment
Technical Tools
(Process Analysis, SPC,
QFD)
Customer
![Page 8: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Developing quality specifications
Input Process Output
Design Design quality
Dimensions of quality
Conformance quality
![Page 9: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Six Sigma Quality
• A philosophy and set of methods companies use to eliminate defects in their products and processes
• Seeks to reduce variation in the processes that lead to product defects
• The name “six sigma” refers to the variation that exists within plus or minus six standard deviations of the process outputs
6
![Page 10: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Six Sigma Quality
![Page 11: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Six Sigma Roadmap (DMAIC)
Next ProjectDefine
Customers, Value, Problem StatementScope, Timeline, TeamPrimary/Secondary & OpEx MetricsCurrent Value Stream MapVoice Of Customer (QFD)
MeasureAssess specification / DemandMeasurement Capability (Gage R&R)Correct the measurement systemProcess map, Spaghetti, Time obs.Measure OVs & IVs / Queues
Analyze (and fix the obvious)Root Cause (Pareto, C&E, brainstorm)Find all KPOVs & KPIVsFMEA, DOE, critical Xs, VA/NVAGraphical Analysis, ANOVAFuture Value Stream Map
ImproveOptimize KPOVs & test the KPIVsRedesign process, set pacemaker5S, Cell design, MRSVisual controlsValue Stream Plan
ControlDocument process (WIs, Std Work)Mistake proof, TT sheet, CI ListAnalyze change in metricsValue Stream ReviewPrepare final report
Validate Project $
Validate Project $
Validate Project $
Validate Project $
Celebrate Project $
![Page 12: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Six Sigma Organization
![Page 13: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Quality Improvement
Traditional
Continuous Improvement
Time
Qua
lity
![Page 14: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Continuous improvement philosophy
1. Kaizen: Japanese term for continuous improvement. A step-by-step improvement of business processes.
2. PDCA: Plan-do-check-act as defined by Deming.
Plan Do
Act Check
3. Benchmarking : what do top performers do?
![Page 15: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Tools used for continuous improvement
1. Process flowchart
![Page 16: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Tools used for continuous improvement
2. Run Chart
Performance
Time
![Page 17: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Tools used for continuous improvement
3. Control Charts
Performance Metric
Time
![Page 18: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Tools used for continuous improvement
4. Cause and effect diagram (fishbone)
Environment
Machine Man
Method Material
![Page 19: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Tools used for continuous improvement
5. Check sheet
Item A B C D E F G
---------------------
√ √ √√ √
√ √
√
√
√ √√ √ √
√√√
√√ √
![Page 20: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Tools used for continuous improvement
6. Histogram
Frequency
![Page 21: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Tools used for continuous improvement
7. Pareto Analysis
A B C D E F
Freq
uenc
y
Perc
enta
ge
50%
100%
0%
75%
25%102030405060
![Page 22: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Summary of Tools
1. Process flow chart
2. Run diagram
3. Control charts
4. Fishbone
5. Check sheet
6. Histogram
7. Pareto analysis
![Page 23: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Case: shortening telephone waiting time…
• A bank is employing a call answering service
• The main goal in terms of quality is “zero waiting time” - customers get a bad impression - company vision to be friendly and easy access
• The question is how to analyze the situation and improve quality
![Page 24: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
The current process
Customer B
OperatorCustomer A
ReceivingParty
How can we reduce waiting time?
![Page 25: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Makes customer wait
Absent receiving party
Working system of operators
Customer Operator
Fishbone diagram analysis
Absent
Out of office
Not at desk
Lunchtime
Too many phone calls
Absent
Not giving receiving party’s coordinates
Complaining
Leaving a message
Lengthy talk
Does not know organization well
Takes too much time to explain
Does not understand customer
![Page 26: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Daily average
Total number
A One operator (partner out of office) 14.3 172
B Receiving party not present 6.1 73
C No one present in the section receiving call 5.1 61
D Section and name of the party not given 1.6 19
E Inquiry about branch office locations 1.3 16
F Other reasons 0.8 10
29.2 351
Reasons why customers have to wait(12-day analysis with check sheet)
![Page 27: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Pareto Analysis: reasons why customers have to wait
A B C D E F
Frequency Percentage
0%
49%
71.2%
100
200
300 87.1%
150
250
![Page 28: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Ideas for improvement
1. Taking lunches on three different shifts
2. Ask all employees to leave messages when leaving desks
3. Compiling a directory where next to personnel’s name appears her/his title
![Page 29: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Results of implementing the recommendations
A B C D E F
Frequency Percentage
100%
0%
49%
71.2%
100
200
300 87.1%
100%
B C A D E F
Frequency Percentage
0%
100
200
300
Before… …After
Improvement
![Page 30: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
In general, how can we monitor quality…?
1. Assignable variation: we can assess the cause
2. Common variation: variation that may not be possible to correct (random variation, random noise)
By observingvariation in
output measures!
![Page 31: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Statistical Process Control (SPC)
Every output measure has a target value and a level of “acceptable” variation (upper and lower tolerance limits)
SPC uses samples from output measures to estimate themean and the variation (standard deviation)
Example
We want beer bottles to be filled with 12 FL OZ ± 0.05 FL OZ
Question:
How do we define the output measures?
![Page 32: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
In order to measure variation we need…
The average (mean) of the observations:
N
iix
NX
1
1
The standard deviation of the observations:
N
XxN
ii
1
2)(
![Page 33: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Average & Variation example
Number of pepperoni’s per pizza: 25, 25, 26, 25, 23, 24, 25, 27
Average:
Standard Deviation:
Number of pepperoni’s per pizza: 25, 22, 28, 30, 27, 20, 25, 23
Average:
Standard Deviation:
Which pizza would you rather have?
![Page 34: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
When is a product good enough?
IncrementalCost of Variability
High
Zero
LowerTolerance
TargetSpec
UpperTolerance
Traditional View
The “Goalpost” Mentality
a.k.aUpper/Lower Design Limits
(UDL, LDL)Upper/Lower Spec Limits
(USL, LSL)Upper/Lower Tolerance Limits
(UTL, LTL)
![Page 35: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
But are all ‘good’ products equal?
IncrementalCost of Variability
High
Zero
LowerSpec
TargetSpec
UpperSpec
Taguchi’s View“Quality Loss Function”
(QLF)
LESS VARIABILITY implies BETTER PERFORMANCE !
![Page 36: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Capability Index (Cpk)
It shows how well the performance measure fits the design specification based on a given
tolerance level
A process is k capable if
LTLkXUTLkX and
1and1
kLTLX
kXUTL
![Page 37: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Capability Index (Cpk)
Cpk < 1 means process is not capable at the k level
Cpk >= 1 means process is capable at the k level
k
XUTLk
LTLXC pk ,min
Another way of writing this is to calculate the capability index:
![Page 38: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Accuracy and Consistency
We say that a process is accurate if its mean is close to the target T.
We say that a process is consistent if its standard deviationis low.
X
![Page 39: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Example 1: Capability Index (Cpk)
X = 10 and σ = 0.5LTL = 9UTL = 11
667.05.031011or 5.03
910min
pkC
UTLLTL X
![Page 40: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Example 2: Capability Index (Cpk)
X = 9.5 and σ = 0.5LTL = 9UTL = 11
UTLLTL X
![Page 41: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Example 3: Capability Index (Cpk)
X = 10 and σ = 2LTL = 9UTL = 11
UTLLTL X
![Page 42: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
ExampleConsider the capability of a process that puts pressurized grease in an aerosol can. The design specs call for an average of 60 pounds per square inch (psi) of pressure in each can with an upper tolerance limit of 65psi and a lower tolerance limit of 55psi. A sample is taken from production and it is found that the cans average 61psi with a standard deviation of 2psi.
1. Is the process capable at the 3 level?2. What is the probability of producing a defect?
![Page 43: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
SolutionLTL = 55 UTL = 65 = 2 61X
6667.0)6667.0,1min()6
6165,6
5561min(
)3
,3
min(
pk
pk
C
XUTLLTLXC
No, the process is not capable at the 3 level.
![Page 44: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Solution
P(defect) = P(X<55) + P(X>65) =P(X<55) + 1 – P(X<65) =P(Z<(55-61)/2) + 1 – P(Z<(65-61)/2) =P(Z<-3) + 1 – P(Z<2)
=G(-3)+1-G(2) =0.00135 + 1 – 0.97725 (from standard normal table) = 0.0241
2.4% of the cans are defective.
![Page 45: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Example (contd)Suppose another process has a sample mean of 60.5 anda standard deviation of 3.
Which process is more accurate? This one.Which process is more consistent? The other one.
![Page 46: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Control Charts
Control charts tell you when a process measure is exhibiting abnormal behavior.
Upper Control Limit
Central Line
Lower Control Limit
![Page 47: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Two Types of Control Charts
• X/R Chart
This is a plot of averages and ranges over time (used for performance measures that are variables)
• p Chart
This is a plot of proportions over time (used for performance measures that are yes/no attributes)
![Page 48: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
When should we use p charts?
1. When decisions are simple “yes” or “no” by inspection
2. When the sample sizes are large enough (>50)
Sample (day) Items Defective Percentage
1 200 10 0.050
2 200 8 0.040
3 200 9 0.045
4 200 13 0.065
5 200 15 0.075
6 200 25 0.125
7 200 16 0.080
Statistical Process Control with p Charts
![Page 49: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Statistical Process Control with p Charts
Let’s assume that we take t samples of size n …
size) (samplesamples) ofnumber (defects"" ofnumber total
p
nppsp
)1(
p
p
zspLCL
zspUCL
![Page 50: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
066.0151
200680
p
017.0200
)066.01(066.0
ps
015.0 017.03 066.0117.0 017.03 066.0
LCLUCL
Statistical Process Control with p Charts
![Page 51: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
LCL = 0.015
UCL = 0.117
p = 0.066
Statistical Process Control with p Charts
![Page 52: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
When should we use X/R charts?
1. It is not possible to label “good” or “bad”
2. If we have relatively smaller sample sizes (<20)
Statistical Process Control with X/R Charts
![Page 53: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Take t samples of size n (sample size should be 5 or more)
n
iix
nX
1
1
}{min }{max ii xxR
R is the range between the highest and the lowest for each sample
Statistical Process Control with X/R Charts
X is the mean for each sample
![Page 54: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
t
jjX
tX
1
1
t
jjR
tR
1
1
Statistical Process Control with X/R Charts
X is the average of the averages.
R is the average of the ranges
![Page 55: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
RAXLCL
RAXUCL
X
X
2
2
define the upper and lower control limits…
RDLCL
RDUCL
R
R
3
4
Statistical Process Control with X/R Charts
Read A2, D3, D4 fromTable TN 8.7
![Page 56: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Example: SPC for bottle filling…
Sample Observation (xi) Average Range (R)
1 11.90 11.92 12.09 11.91 12.012 12.03 12.03 11.92 11.97 12.073 11.92 12.02 11.93 12.01 12.074 11.96 12.06 12.00 11.91 11.985 11.95 12.10 12.03 12.07 12.006 11.99 11.98 11.94 12.06 12.067 12.00 12.04 11.92 12.00 12.078 12.02 12.06 11.94 12.07 12.009 12.01 12.06 11.94 11.91 11.9410 11.92 12.05 11.92 12.09 12.07
![Page 57: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Example: SPC for bottle filling…
Sample Observation (xi) Average Range (R)
1 11.90 11.92 12.09 11.91 12.01 11.97 0.192 12.03 12.03 11.92 11.97 12.07 12.00 0.153 11.92 12.02 11.93 12.01 12.07 11.99 0.154 11.96 12.06 12.00 11.91 11.98 11.98 0.155 11.95 12.10 12.03 12.07 12.00 12.03 0.156 11.99 11.98 11.94 12.06 12.06 12.01 0.127 12.00 12.04 11.92 12.00 12.07 12.01 0.158 12.02 12.06 11.94 12.07 12.00 12.02 0.139 12.01 12.06 11.94 11.91 11.94 11.97 0.1510 11.92 12.05 11.92 12.09 12.07 12.01 0.17
Calculate the average and the range for each sample…
![Page 58: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Then…
00.12X
is the average of the averages
15.0R
is the average of the ranges
![Page 59: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Finally…
91.1115.058.000.1209.1215.058.000.12
X
X
LCLUCL
Calculate the upper and lower control limits
015.0022.115.011.2
R
R
LCLUCL
![Page 60: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
LCL = 11.90
UCL = 12.10
The X Chart
X = 12.00
![Page 61: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
The R Chart
LCL = 0.00
R = 0.15
UCL = 0.32
![Page 62: Quality Management . ppt - GT](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051008/58919f441a28abdf048b5564/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
The X/R Chart
LCL
UCL
X
LCL
R
UCL
What can you conclude?