Download - PROMS Monthly Oct 2010
1 PROMs: provisional analysis of the experimental data, April 2009 to October 2010
Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS), Pre and Post Operative Data,
April 2009 to October 2010, West Midlands
Introduction
Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) measure quality from the patient perspective. Initially
the PROMs programmes cover four clinical procedures: groin hernia surgery, hip replacement, knee
replacement and varicose vein surgery. PROMs calculate the health gain (as reported by the patient)
after surgical treatment using pre and post operative surveys.
This report updates PROMs data to October 2010 for all West Midlands’ providers. At this time the data
remains experimental nationally, therefore this report does not draw any conclusions on the variation in
the quality of services. The aim of the report is to keep clinicians and commissioners informed about the
programme and to seek their views on the process and how WMQI can assist in the application of
PROMs in improving the quality of services.
Previous PROMs reports by the WMQI can be accessed from:
http://www.wmqi.westmidlands.nhs.uk/clinical-measures/proms/wmqis-work-on-proms/
Data Collection
Before a patient undergoes one of the four PROMs procedures, the provider should offer the patient a
PROMs questionnaire (i.e. pre-operative questionnaire) for completion. The guidance states that this
should happen in the interval between the patient being passed fit for surgery and the treatment taking
place. Completion of the questionnaire is voluntary for the patient.
The completed pre-operative PROMs questionnaires are then transferred to the DH contractor
responsible for collating the information, where the questionnaires are linked securely to the Hospital
Episode Statistics (HES)1 and National Joint Registry (NJR)2 databases.
After three or six months, depending on procedure, the DH contractor posts out the follow-up post-
operative questionnaire to the patient’s home. Once the form has been completed by the patient and
returned, it is electronically scanned and linked with the pre-operative data along with HES and NJR, if
applicable.
Definition of PROMs Measures
Two types of PROMs measures are reported: (i) the EQ-5D system for general health and (ii) the
condition-specific measures, Oxford hip and knee score and Aberdeen varicose vein score.
1 See http://www.hesonline.nhs.uk/Ease/servlet/ContentServer?siteID=1937 for details of HES. 2 See http://www.njrcentre.org.uk/njrcentre/default.aspx for details of NJR.
2 PROMs: provisional analysis of the experimental data, April 2009 to October 2010
EQ-5D Index Score
The EQ-5D descriptive system comprises the following five dimensions describing the patient’s general
health:
mobility
self-care
usual activities
pain/discomfort
anxiety/depression
Each dimension has three levels: no problems, some problems, and severe problems. EQ-5D health
states are then converted into a single summary index score up to 1(best health) by applying a formula
that essentially attaches weights to each of the levels in each dimension.
Oxford Hip/Knee Score
The Oxford Hip/Knee Score comprise of 12 questions relating to the patient’s experience of pain, ease of
joint movement and ease of undertaking normal domestic activities such as walking or climbing stairs.
All questions are presented denoting least (or no) symptoms scoring 4 and those representing greatest
severity scoring 0. The individual scores are then added together to provide a single score between 0
(worst) and 48 (best).
Aberdeen Varicose Vein Score
The Aberdeen Varicose Veins Questionnaire (AVVQ) is scored from 0 (best quality of life) to 100 (worst
quality of life).
Data Analysis
Case-mix adjusted average health gain in terms of the measures described above is estimated for each
provider. The adjusted measure takes into account the fact that organisations deal with patients with a
differing case-mix, e.g. age, sex, co-morbidity. Further information regarding the methodology can be
found at http://www.northgateproms.co.uk/documents.html
When interpreting the organisational-level results, it is important that the patterns shown are taken to
be a starting point for further investigation rather than giving a definitive conclusion on organisational
performance. Extreme results may not be down to clinical reasons. They could also be caused by
random variation (irregular and erratic fluctuations or chance factors that, in practical terms, cannot be
anticipated, detected, identified, or eliminated); by data quality issues; or by differences.
For further information and a national summary see
http://www.hesonline.nhs.uk/Ease/servlet/ContentServer?siteID=1937&categoryID=1295
3 PROMs: provisional analysis of the experimental data, April 2009 to October 2010
Groin Hernia
Data Completeness
Table 1 shows the statistics on the number of submitted PROMs questionnaires for groin hernia
procedures (both pre and post operative) by provider for the period between April 2009 and October
2010. Please see the ‘Data Collection’ section on Page 1 of the report for details of the ‘eligible HES
episodes’, ‘pre-operative questionnaires (Pre-op Qs)’, ‘linked questionnaires (Qs linked to HES episodes)’
and ‘post-operative questionnaires (Post-op Qs)’.
Table 1 PROMs data completeness (April 2009 – October 2010) – groin hernia
Providers3
Eligible HES
episodes4
Pre-Op Qs
Qs linked to HES
episodes5
Post-Op Qs
returned to date
6
% Post-Op Qs
returned out of
episodes7
England 108045 57556 40642 34679 32.1%
Burton Hospitals 223 117 85 77 34.5%
Walsall Hospitals 457 302 218 168 36.8%
Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals 764 287 238 153 20.0%
University Hospital of North Staffordshire 734 187 140 136 18.5% The Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals 567 354 273 226 39.9%
Worcestershire Acute Hospitals 1117 460 363 297 26.6%
University Hospital Birmingham 686 293 219 173 25.2%
South Warwickshire General Hospitals 422 305 271 203 48.1%
University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire 853 391 299 260 30.5%
Mid Staffordshire General Hospitals 382 137 100 84 22.0%
Dudley Group of Hospitals 731 345 258 220 30.1%
Shrewsbury & Telford Hospital 1149 867 663 561 48.8%
Heart of England NHS 1194 846 573 426 35.7%
BMI - The Droitwich Spa Hospital 54 69 38 50 92.6%
South Staffordshire PCT 182 101 97 76 41.8%
Hereford Hospitals 324 292 227 158 48.8%
The Midlands NHS Treatment Centre 275 257 162 132 48.0%
Spire South Bank Hospital 64 142 46 98 153.1%
The George Eliot Hospital 357 232 180 144 40.3% Data source: Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) / PROMs, The NHS Information Centre for Health and Social Care
3 Only providers with case-mix adjusted scores calculated are shown in this table. For Other providers, please see Table 5 Appendix. 4 The data from April 2009 to March 2010 has been finalised and will not change. Data from April 2010 onwards is currently provisional. 5 These figures are based on questionnaires linked to HES episodes using an algorithm that compares a number of different combinations of patient identifiers. This methodology may be revised or enhanced for future publications. The counts are based upon the pre-operative questionnaire completion date. 6 The number of records affects the statistical reliability of the PROMs measures and caution should be exercised when looking at data for trust with less than 25 records submitted. 7 The counts are based upon the pre-operative questionnaire completion date.
4 PROMs: provisional analysis of the experimental data, April 2009 to October 2010
EQ-5D Index Score
Figure 1 shows the case mix adjusted change in the average EQ-5D index scores reported (between pre
and post-operation) for each West Midlands’ providers of groin hernia operations. Description of the
EQ-5D index score can be found from the Definition of PROMs Measures section on Page 1 of this
report.
Figure 1
Data source: Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) / PROMs, The NHS Information Centre for Health and Social Care
Figure 1 shows that:
Case-mix adjusted changes in EQ-5D score for all 19 West Midlands’ providers were positive (i.e.
improvement in health). For fifteen of the providers, the improvement was statistically
significant (i.e. confidence intervals do not cross 0);
There was no statistically significant difference between any of the West Midlands’ providers
and the national average on this measure.
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
Case mix adjusted changes (pre and post operation) in average EQ-5D Index Score with confidence intervals, Groin Hernia Operations, PROMs, Apr 2009 - Oct2010
worse
better
5 PROMs: provisional analysis of the experimental data, April 2009 to October 2010
Hip replacement
Data Completeness
Table 2 shows the statistics on the number of submitted PROMs questionnaires for hip replacement
procedures (both pre and post operative) by provider during the period between April 2009 and October
2010. Please see the ‘Data Collection’ section on Page 1 of the report for details of the ‘eligible HES
episodes’, ‘pre-operative questionnaires (Pre-op Qs)’, ‘linked questionnaires (Qs linked to HES episodes)’
and ‘post-operative questionnaires (Post-op Qs)’.
Table 2 PROMs data completeness (April 2009 – October 2010) – hip replacement*
Providers3
Eligible HES
episodes4
Pre-Op Qs
Qs linked to HES
episodes5
Post-Op Qs
returned to date
6
% Post-Op Qs
returned out of
episodes7
England 103297 76694 56766 42656 41.3%
Burton Hospitals 410 364 290 209 51.0%
Dudley Group of Hospitals 626 596 440 329 52.6%
Heart of England NHS 1063 746 559 370 34.8%
Hereford Hospitals 525 410 366 252 48.0%
Mid Staffordshire General Hospitals 530 151 90 82 15.5%
Robert Jones & Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic & District Hospital 1702 1602 1288 934 54.9%
Royal Orthopaedic Hospital 1531 1572 1169 804 52.5%
Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals 415 300 268 197 47.5%
Shrewsbury & Telford Hospital 421 330 259 198 47.0%
South Warwickshire General Hospitals 580 445 362 253 43.6%
The George Eliot Hospital 388 370 312 209 53.9%
The Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals 508 370 335 197 38.8%
University Hospital of North Staffordshire 672 770 509 397 59.1%
University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire 870 550 389 322 37.0%
Walsall Hospitals 296 119 99 76 25.7%
Worcestershire Acute Hospitals 1010 644 519 350 34.7% Data source: Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) / PROMs, The NHS Information Centre for Health and Social Care
*Please see Page 3 for all the footnotes in this table
6 PROMs: provisional analysis of the experimental data, April 2009 to October 2010
EQ-5D Index Score
Figure 2 shows the case mix adjusted change in the average EQ-5D index scores reported (from pre-
operation to post-operation) for all West Midlands’ providers. Description of the EQ-5D index score can
be found from the Definition of PROMs Measures section on Page 1 of this report.
Figure 2
Data source: Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) / PROMs, The NHS Information Centre for Health and Social Care
Figure 2 shows that:
Case-mix adjusted changes in the average EQ-5D score for all 16 West Midlands’ providers were
positive (i.e. improvement in health) and the improvement was statistically significant (i.e.
confidence intervals do not cross 0);
There was no statistically significant difference between any of the West Midlands’ providers
and the national average on this measure.
0.200
0.250
0.300
0.350
0.400
0.450
0.500
0.550
Ch
ange
in E
Q-5
D
Changes (pre and post operation) in ADJUSTED EQ-5D Index Scores with confidence intervals, Hip Replacement Operations, PROMs,
Apr 2009 - Oct2010
worse
better
7 PROMs: provisional analysis of the experimental data, April 2009 to October 2010
Oxford Hip Score
Figure 3 shows the adjusted change in the average Oxford Hip Score reported (from pre-operation to
post-operation) for each West Midlands’ providers. Description of the Oxford Hip score can be found
from the section Definition of PROMs Measures on Page 1 of this report.
Figure 3
Data source: Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) / PROMs, The NHS Information Centre for Health and Social Care
Figure 3 shows that:
Case-mix adjusted changes in the average Oxford hip score for all 16 West Midlands’ providers
were positive (i.e. improvement in health) and the improvement was statistically significant (i.e.
confidence intervals do not cross 0);
None of the West Midlands’ providers was significantly different from the national average on
this measure.
12.0
14.0
16.0
18.0
20.0
22.0
24.0
26.0
Ch
ange
in O
xfo
rd H
ip S
core
Changes (pre and post operation) in average Oxford Hip Score with confidence intervals, Hip Replacement Operations, PROMs,
Apr 2009 - Oct2010
worse
better
8 PROMs: provisional analysis of the experimental data, April 2009 to October 2010
Knee replacement
Data Completeness
Table 3 shows the statistics on the number of submitted PROMs questionnaires for knee replacement
procedures (both pre and post operative) by provider during the period between April 2009 and October
2010. Please see the ‘Data Collection’ section on Page 1 of the report for details of the ‘eligible HES
episodes’, ‘pre-operative questionnaires (Pre-op Qs)’, ‘linked questionnaires (Qs linked to HES episodes)’
and ‘post-operative questionnaires (Post-op Qs)’.
Table 3 PROMs data completeness (April 2009 – October 2010) – knee replacement*
Providers3
Eligible HES
episodes
4
Pre-Op Qs
Qs linked to HES
episodes5
Post-Op Qs
returned to date
6
% Post-Op Qs
returned out of
episodes7
England 116728 91391 62348 48853 41.9%
Burton Hospitals 460 465 333 250 54.3%
Dudley Group of Hospitals 917 833 608 436 47.5%
Heart of England NHS 1550 1045 826 502 32.4%
Hereford Hospitals 494 445 351 258 52.2%
Mid Staffordshire General Hospitals 581 200 114 99 17.0%
Robert Jones & Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic & District Hospital 1709 1648 1241 920 53.8%
Royal Orthopaedic Hospital 1425 1279 1038 632 44.4%
Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals 856 611 541 391 45.7%
Shrewsbury & Telford Hospital 440 376 291 207 47.0%
South Warwickshire General Hospitals 625 572 402 262 41.9%
The George Eliot Hospital 550 528 432 283 51.5%
The Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals 730 631 515 317 43.4%
University Hospital of North Staffordshire 640 694 411 390 60.9%
University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire 1069 778 478 422 39.5%
Walsall Hospitals 462 191 155 136 29.4%
Worcestershire Acute Hospitals 1068 624 462 360 33.7% Data source: Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) / PROMs, The NHS Information Centre for Health and Social Care
*Please see Page 3 for all the footnotes in this table
9 PROMs: provisional analysis of the experimental data, April 2009 to October 2010
EQ-5D Index Score
Figure 4 shows the case mix adjusted change in the average EQ-5D index scores reported (from pre-
operation to post-operation) for each West Midlands’ providers of knee replacement operations.
Description of the EQ-5D index score can be found from the Definition of PROMs Measures section on
Page 1 of this report.
Figure 4
Data source: Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) / PROMs, The NHS Information Centre for Health and Social Care
Figure 4 shows that:
Case-mix adjusted changes in the average EQ-5D score for all 16 West Midlands’ providers were
positive (i.e. improvement in health) and the improvement was statistically significant (i.e.
confidence intervals do not cross 0);
University Hospital of North Staffordshire are significantly worse than the England average
0.100
0.150
0.200
0.250
0.300
0.350
0.400
0.450
0.500
Ch
ange
in E
Q-5
D
Changes (pre and post operation) in ADJUSTED EQ-5D Index Scores with confidence intervals, Knee Replacement Operations, PROMs,
Apr 2009 - Oct2010
worse
better
10 PROMs: provisional analysis of the experimental data, April 2009 to October 2010
Oxford Knee Score
Figure 5 shows the case-mix adjusted change in the average Oxford Knee Score reported (from pre-
operation to post-operation) for each West Midlands’ providers. Description of the Oxford Knee score
can be found from the section Definition of PROMs Measures on Page 1 of this report
Figure 5
Data source: Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) / PROMs, The NHS Information Centre for Health and Social Care
Figure 5 shows that:
Case-mix adjusted changes in the average Oxford knee score for all 16 West Midlands’ providers
were positive (i.e. improvement in health) and the improvement was statistically significant (i.e.
confidence intervals do not cross 0);
University Hospital of North Staffordshire is significantly worse than the England average and
the West Midlands average; Sandwell & West Birmingham are significantly worse than the
England average.
Burton Hospitals are significantly better than the England average and the West Midlands
average.
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
16.0
18.0
20.0
Ch
age
in O
xfo
rd k
nee
sco
re
Changes (pre and post operation) in Oxford Knee Score with confidence intervals, Knee Replacement Operations, PROMs, Apr 2009 - Oct2010
worse
better
11 PROMs: provisional analysis of the experimental data, April 2009 to October 2010
Varicose Vein
Data Completeness
Table 4 shows the statistics on the number of submitted PROMs questionnaires for varicose vein
procedures (both pre and post operative) by provider during the period between April 2009 and October
2010. Please see the ‘Data Collection’ section on Page 1 of the report for details of the ‘eligible HES
episodes’, ‘pre-operative questionnaires (Pre-op Qs)’, ‘linked questionnaires (Qs linked to HES episodes)’
and ‘post-operative questionnaires (Post-op Qs)’.
Table 4 PROMs data completeness (April 2009 – October 2010) – varicose vein*
Providers3
Eligible HES
episodes4
Pre-Op Qs
Qs linked to HES
episodes5
Post-Op Qs
returned to date
6
% Post-Op Qs
returned out of
episodes7
England 54266 23420 18913 12381 22.8%
Dudley Group of Hospitals 1034 540 510 290 28.0%
Heart of England NHS 1243 603 328 165 13.3%
Hereford Hospitals 181 136 124 81 44.8%
Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals 507 204 197 99 19.5%
Shrewsbury & Telford Hospital 447 321 251 187 41.8%
The Midlands Nhs Treatment Centre 80 50 44 33 n/a
The Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals 722 391 304 183 25.3%
University Hospital Birmingham Nhs Foundation Trust 902 200 172 102 11.3%
University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire 363 90 82 58 16.0%
Walsall Hospitals 278 115 103 59 21.2%
Worcestershire Acute Hospitals 735 168 162 95 12.9% Data source: Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) / PROMs, The NHS Information Centre for Health and Social Care
*Please see Page 3 for all the footnotes in this table
12 PROMs: provisional analysis of the experimental data, April 2009 to October 2010
EQ-5D Index Score
Figure 6 shows the case mix adjusted change in the average EQ-5D index scores reported (from pre-
operation to post-operation) for each West Midlands’ providers of varicose vein operations. Description
of the EQ-5D index score can be found from the Definition of PROMs Measures section on Page 1 of this
report.
Figure 6
Data source: Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) / PROMs, The NHS Information Centre for Health and Social Care
Figure 6 shows that:
Case-mix adjusted changes in EQ-5D score for all of the West Midlands’ providers were positive.
The improvement was statistically significant for nine of the ten providers (i.e. confidence
intervals do not cross 0);
There was no statistically significant difference between any of the West Midlands’ providers
and the national average on this measure.
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
Ch
ange
in E
Q-5
D
Changes (pre and post operation) in ADJUSTED EQ-5D Index Scores with confidence intervals, Varicose Vein Operations, PROMs, Apr 2009 - Oct2010
worse
better
13 PROMs: provisional analysis of the experimental data, April 2009 to October 2010
Aberdeen Varicose Vein Score
Figure 7 shows the case mix adjusted change in the average Aberdeen varicose vein scores reported
(from pre-operation to post-operation) for each West Midlands’ providers. Description of the Aberdeen
varicose vein score can be found from the Definition of PROMs Measures section on Page 1 of this
report.
Figure 7
Data source: Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) / PROMs, The NHS Information Centre for Health and Social Care
Figure 7 shows that:
Case-mix adjusted changes in the average Aberdeen Varicose Vein Score for all 11 of the West
Midlands’ providers were negative (i.e. improvement in health). The improvement was
statistically significant for seven of the providers (i.e. confidence intervals do not cross 0);
There was no statistically significant difference between any of the West Midlands’ providers
and the national average on this measure.
-25.000
-20.000
-15.000
-10.000
-5.000
0.000
5.000
10.000
15.000
Ch
ange
in A
be
rdee
n S
core
Changes (pre and post operation) in Aberdeen Varicose Vein Score with confidence intervals, Varicose Vein Operations, PROMs, Apr 2009 - Oct2010
better
worse
14 PROMs: provisional analysis of the experimental data, April 2009 to October 2010
Next steps
WMQI will be publishing the West Midlands data on a monthly basis on our website
(http://www.wmqi.westmidlands.nhs.uk/clinical-measures/proms/), along with relevant commentary
on the methodologies and the PROM scores.
Please send any comments you have to [email protected] or use the feedback form on our
website (http://www.wmqi.westmidlands.nhs.uk/about-wmqi/feedback/).
Produced by
WMQI
NHS West Midlands
St Chads Court
213 Hagley Road
Edgbaston
Birmingham
B16 9RG
tel: 0121 695 2460
email: [email protected]
web: www.wmqi.westmidlands.nhs.uk
twitter: @wmqi
15 PROMs: provisional analysis of the experimental data, April 2009 to October 2010
Appendix Data quality for providers which are excluded from the case-mix adjusted
analysis Table 5 PROMs data completeness (April 2009 – October 2010) – groin hernia, other providers*
Providers Eligible
HES episodes
4
Pre-Op Qs
Qs linked to HES
episodes4
Post-Op Qs
returned to date
5
% Post-Op Qs
returned out of
episodes6
England 108045 57556 40642 34679 32.1%
West Midlands Hospital 122 39 30 24 19.7%
Rowley Hall Hospital 124 40 30 24 19.4%
BMI - The Meriden Hospital 62 27 19 18 29.0%
Worcestershire PCT 60 36 29 22 36.7%
Spire Little Aston Hospital 58 75 45 48 82.8%
Spire Parkway Hospital 53 74 9 56 105.7%
Shropshire County PCT 43 15 13 12 27.9%
BMI The Edgbaston Hospital 28 30 13 16 57.1%
Nuffield Health, Wolverhampton Hospital 21 88 16 47 n/a
Birmingham Children's Hospital 20 * * * n/a
Nuffield Health, Hereford Hospital 19 79 10 40 210.5%
Nuffield Health, Shrewsbury Hospital 13 50 8 25 192.3%
Table 6 PROMs data completeness (April 2009 – October 2010) – hip replacement, other providers*
Providers Eligible
HES episodes
4
Pre-Op Qs
Qs linked to HES
episodes5
Post-Op Qs
returned to date
6
% Post-Op Qs
returned out of
episodes7
England 103297 76694 56766 42656 41.3%
Spire Little Aston Hospital 72 103 57 44 61.1%
Rowley Hall Hospital 59 36 31 25 n/a
Kidderminster Nhs Treatment Centre 45 0 * n/a n/a
West Midlands Hospital 41 17 15 10 24.4%
West Midlands Hospital 41 17 15 10 24.4%
Spire Parkway Hospital 40 136 35 69 172.5%
Spire South Bank Hospital 32 77 21 58 181.3%
Bmi - The Droitwich Spa Hospital 29 62 23 26 89.7%
Bmi The Edgbaston Hospital 24 33 13 12 50.0%
Bmi - The Meriden Hospital 22 19 14 * n/a
Nuffield Health, Wolverhampton Hospital 10 93 12 50 500.0%
Nuffield Health, Hereford Hospital 8 90 6 62 775.0%
University Hospital Birmingham Nhs Foundation Trust 6 0 0 0 0.0%
16 PROMs: provisional analysis of the experimental data, April 2009 to October 2010
Table 7 PROMs data completeness (April 2009 – October 2010) – knee replacement, other providers*
Providers Eligible
HES episodes
4
Pre-Op Qs
Qs linked to HES
episodes5
Post-Op Qs
returned to date
6
% Post-Op Qs
returned out of
episodes7
England
University Hospital Birmingham Nhs Foundation Trust * 0 0 0 n/a
Nuffield Health, Hereford Hospital * 71 * 45 n/a
Nuffield Health, Shrewsbury Hospital * 46 * 26 n/a
Kidderminster Nhs Treatment Centre 116 0 27 n/a n/a
Spire Little Aston Hospital 63 85 41 34 54.0%
Spire Parkway Hospital 54 131 42 51 94.4%
West Midlands Hospital 53 42 27 18 34.0%
Rowley Hall Hospital 45 33 28 13 28.9%
Spire South Bank Hospital 39 90 33 55 141.0%
Bmi - The Droitwich Spa Hospital 35 77 22 35 100.0%
Bmi - The Meriden Hospital 27 16 11 * n/a
Bmi The Edgbaston Hospital 12 35 6 * n/a
Nuffield Health, Wolverhampton Hospital 6 142 * 40 666.7%
Table 8 PROMs data completeness (April 2009 – October 2010) – varicose vein, other providers*
Providers Eligible
HES episodes
4
Pre-Op Qs
Qs linked to HES
episodes5
Post-Op Qs
returned to date
6
% Post-Op Qs
returned out of
episodes7
England 54266 23420 18913 12381 22.8%
South Staffordshire Pct * * * * n/a
Rowley Hall Hospital * 0 0 0 n/a
University Hospital Of North Staffordshire Nhs Trust 290 51 35 32 11.0%
South Warwickshire Nhs Foundation Trust 98 7 6 * n/a
Mid Staffordshire Nhs Foundation Trust 95 14 12 9 9.5%
George Eliot Hospital Nhs Trust 59 33 26 23 39.0%
Burton Hospitals Nhs Foundation Trust 31 19 10 9 29.0%
Shropshire County Pct 17 8 8 7 41.2%
West Midlands Hospital 9 0 0 0 0.0%
Data source: Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) / PROMs, The NHS Information Centre for Health and Social Care
*Please see Page 3 for all the footnotes in this table