PROCESSES OF ABSTRACTION IN CONTEXT
THE NESTED EPISTEMIC ACTIONS MODEL
Tommy DreyfusRina HershkowitzBaruch Schwarz
ISF Jerusalem workshop on Guided Construction of Knowledge in Classrooms
February 5, 2007
February 5, 2007 Nested epistemic actions 2
ABSTRACTION
AS AN ACTIVITY
ACTIONSEPISTEMIC
R B C
NESTED
INTERACTING
social
curr
icul
ar
hist
oric
al
learningcontext
February 5, 2007 Nested epistemic actions 3
An example The task: All questions refer to the following two rectangles:
• Find as many properties as you can• Compare the sums of the diagonals (DSP)
– Will the property always hold?
• Compare the products of the diagonals (DPP)– Will the property always hold?
• Justify your claims
7 13
9 15
3 9
5 11
February 5, 2007 Nested epistemic actions 4
The pair HaNe (Grade 7)
• Had used letters• Had used (a+b)c=ac+bc• Had not used algebra as a tool for justification• Stated the DSP with no urge to justify• Stated the DPP
– Raised the issue of justification
– Justified the DSP!
• Came back to justify DPP when asked to do so.
February 5, 2007 Nested epistemic actions 5
HaNe’s justification of the DPP
1) Did we already prove it?
2) Extending the distributive law
3) Hesitation
4) The difference 12 becomes significant
5) Closure
February 5, 2007 Nested epistemic actions 6
The second segment: (x+6) (x+2)• Ha133 And this [thinks] ...• Ne134 It's impossible to do the distributive law
here. Wait, one can do ...• Ha135 This is 6x.• Ne136 Then this is 6x times x and 6x times 2.• Ha137 Wait, first, no ...• Ne138 Yes.• Ha139 No because this is x plus 6, this is not
6x, it's different. Wait. First one does x; then it's xx plus 2x, and here 6x plus 24. Then
...• In140 Not 24, why 24?• Ha141 Ah, 12.
February 5, 2007 Nested epistemic actions 7
Algebra as a tool for justification
• Together, the five segments constitute a proof of DPP• The girls used algebra as a tool for this proof• This is a new construct for them: Algebra can be used
as a tool to prove general claims• Within this process, they have used the extended
distributive law, another new construct for them• Their knowledge about algebra has (potentially) been
restructured, made more profound
February 5, 2007 Nested epistemic actions 8
ABSTRACTION AS AN ACTIVITY• The new construct arises during mathematical activity• The motivation for the new construct arises out of a
mathematical need for it• The thinking mode is mathematical • Vertical mathematization (Freudenthal school)• Abstraction is an activity of vertically reorganizing
previous mathematical constructs into a new mathematical construct
• Abstraction is not objective and universal• It depends on context
February 5, 2007 Nested epistemic actions 9
THE EPISTEMIC ACTIONS
• Actions used in processes of construction of knowledge
• Observability
• Data-based theory-building led to– Recognizing– Building-with– Constructing
• RBC
February 5, 2007 Nested epistemic actions 10
Recognizing
The 're-cognition' of previously encountered mental structures that are inherent in a given mathematical situation.
• Ha133 And this [thinks] ...• Ne134 It's impossible to do the distributive law
here. Wait, one can do ...• Ha135 This is 6x.• Ne136 This is 6x times x and 6x times 2.• Ha137 Wait, first, no ...• Ne138 Yes.• Ha139 No because this is x plus 6, this is not 6x...
February 5, 2007 Nested epistemic actions 11
Building-With The combination of elements of mental structures in order to achieve a given goal.
• Ne136 This is 6x times x and 6x times 2.• Ha137 Wait, first, no ...• Ne138 Yes.• Ha139 No because this is x plus 6, this is not 6x, it's
different. Wait. First one does x; then it's xx plus 2x, and here 6x plus 24.
Goals:• solving a problem [computing (x+6)(x+2)]• justifying a statement (DPP)
February 5, 2007 Nested epistemic actions 12
Constructing
• ‘Cognizing’ novel constructs• Vertical reorganization of knowledge• Objects to be constructed include:
Methods, strategies, concepts• Process may be slow or sudden, short or long• For example:
– The extended distributive law (short)
– Algebra as a tool for justification (intermediate/long)
February 5, 2007 Nested epistemic actions 13
Dynamic Nesting • In processes of abstraction, the epistemic actions
are dynamically nested.• R nested in B:
• Ha139 First one does x; then it's xx plus 2x, and here 6x plus 24.
• R, B nested in C• Possibly lower level C nested in C.
• C1 - Constructing the extended distributivelaw -consists of R and B actions
• C - Algebra as a tool – consists of C1andmany R and B-actions C
C1
February 5, 2007 Nested epistemic actions 14
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
89
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
C2
C2
C1
C1
C3
C4
C3
InteractingParallel
Constructions
For example:BranchingCombining
Related to context,Specifically tothe way computer tools are used
February 5, 2007 Nested epistemic actions 15
Consolidation
• Constructing– First instance– Awareness?– Fragility of knowledge
• Sequences of activities– Countably infinite sets (Tsamir and Dreyfus)– The probability project (Hershkowitz, Hadas,
Schwarz, Dreyfus)– Algebra/exponential growth (Tabach,
Hershkowitz, Schwarz)
February 5, 2007 Nested epistemic actions 16
Consolidation (cont.)
• Characteristics of consolidation– Awareness– Confidence– Flexibility
• Conducive for consolidation– Problem solving– Reflection– Further constructing
February 5, 2007 Nested epistemic actions 17
In conclusion
The genesis of an abstraction in three stages
• The mathematical need for a new construct
• Constructing – first time emergence
• Consolidating – an indefinite process
The analytical power of the model
• Combining constructions and justification
February 5, 2007 Nested epistemic actions 18
Some uses of the model• Dooley – Multiplication / Whole class interaction • Bikner-Ahsbahs – Fractions / Interest• Hershkowitz Schwarz and Dreyfus – Algebra / Dyadic
interaction• Ron, Dreyfus and Hershkowitz – Probability / Partially correct
knowledge constructs• Ozmantar and Monaghan – Function transformations /
Consolidation• Williams – Calculus / Creativity• Kidron and Dreyfus – Dynamic processes, chaos,
bifurcations / Solitary learner• Stehlikova – Abstract algebra / Solitary learner