![Page 1: Peer Observer Presentation February 19, 2013 1. 2 *Dropout rate includes grades 7-12](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062322/5697c0101a28abf838ccaee0/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Peer Observer PresentationFebruary 19, 2013
1
![Page 2: Peer Observer Presentation February 19, 2013 1. 2 *Dropout rate includes grades 7-12](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062322/5697c0101a28abf838ccaee0/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2*Dropout rate includes grades 7-12
![Page 3: Peer Observer Presentation February 19, 2013 1. 2 *Dropout rate includes grades 7-12](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062322/5697c0101a28abf838ccaee0/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
![Page 4: Peer Observer Presentation February 19, 2013 1. 2 *Dropout rate includes grades 7-12](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062322/5697c0101a28abf838ccaee0/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4*CDE has not yet published dropout data by ELL status.
![Page 5: Peer Observer Presentation February 19, 2013 1. 2 *Dropout rate includes grades 7-12](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062322/5697c0101a28abf838ccaee0/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
College Remediation rates are calculated by the Colorado Department of Higher Education (CDHE). The rates are based on students who enroll in higher ed. institutions in the state of Colorado.Note: Years represent the school year in which students completed high school.
![Page 6: Peer Observer Presentation February 19, 2013 1. 2 *Dropout rate includes grades 7-12](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062322/5697c0101a28abf838ccaee0/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
![Page 7: Peer Observer Presentation February 19, 2013 1. 2 *Dropout rate includes grades 7-12](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062322/5697c0101a28abf838ccaee0/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Segment Suggested Intervention needed Credits at entry (to IP option, where applicable)
Annual Dropout Rate
#1: 8th graders demonstrating key risk factors (from Hopkins)
- Very clear plan for transition to proper school, likely traditional school
N/A
2a. 9th graders who are slipping: demonstrating key risk factors but are still less than 30 credits off track
Current school: Assessment and intervention needed mid-way through semester 1
2%
2b. 9th graders who are falling: They have risk factors and are more than 30 credits behind
Current school: Assessment needed at semester Intensive Pathway settings: portion will need alternate setting
0-60 13%
3. Young and far: 16-17/ 2 or more years off track Intensive Pathway settings 0-120 37%
4a. Old and very close: 17 and less than 30 credits off track
Finish at current school: Clear plan for each student- Some may need engagement centers
12%
4b. Old and close enough to graduate, but maybe not with their class: (17+, 30 – 120 credits off track)
Finish at current school, though likely with later classIntensive Pathway settings: engagement center
140+ 25%
5. Old and far: 18+/ ≥ 2 years off track Intensive Pathway settings Less than 120 41%
![Page 8: Peer Observer Presentation February 19, 2013 1. 2 *Dropout rate includes grades 7-12](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062322/5697c0101a28abf838ccaee0/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Grouping Age Credits at Entry
Young and Far (segment 3)
16 0-60 credits
17 0-120 credits
18 120-180 credits
Old and Close (segment 4a and 4b)
18+ At least 140 credits
Old and Far (segment 5)
18+ Fewer than 120 credits
![Page 9: Peer Observer Presentation February 19, 2013 1. 2 *Dropout rate includes grades 7-12](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062322/5697c0101a28abf838ccaee0/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
![Page 10: Peer Observer Presentation February 19, 2013 1. 2 *Dropout rate includes grades 7-12](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062322/5697c0101a28abf838ccaee0/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
![Page 11: Peer Observer Presentation February 19, 2013 1. 2 *Dropout rate includes grades 7-12](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062322/5697c0101a28abf838ccaee0/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Determine which appendices may be applicable◦ Use your professional judgment!
Credit Recovery Engagement Center Interventionists Blended learning Affective needs
Have an in depth conversation with your teachers and/or school staff ahead of time so you can better understand what you should expect to see:◦ Schedule◦ Delivery style◦ Curriculum model◦ Student level/academic achievement ◦ Attendance◦ Class size◦ Behavior issues
![Page 12: Peer Observer Presentation February 19, 2013 1. 2 *Dropout rate includes grades 7-12](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062322/5697c0101a28abf838ccaee0/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Reach out to TECs who support each school◦ Betty Inhelder – CLA, Florence Crittenton, ◦ Diane Tribbett – DC21 ◦ Annashay Sutherland – North Engagement Center, Lincoln RESPECT Academy, West Career Academy
◦ Lisa Wolford – Vista Academy, Prep Academy
Other Resources:◦ Katie Boogaard - Director of Student Engagement◦ Randy Johnson - IS Pathway Schools◦ Steve Goldstein - Data Partner, Pathway Schools◦ Oscar Joseph - School Improvement Partner, Pathway Schools