![Page 1: Paul Stankus Oak Ridge RHIC/AGS Users’ Meeting June 20, 05](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070406/56814122550346895dacf645/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Paul StankusOak Ridge
RHIC/AGS Users’ Meeting June 20, 05
QGP: Perfect Fluid and the Early Universe
Paul StankusOak Ridge Nat’l Lab
Ohio APS, Mar/Apr 06
![Page 2: Paul Stankus Oak Ridge RHIC/AGS Users’ Meeting June 20, 05](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070406/56814122550346895dacf645/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
![Page 3: Paul Stankus Oak Ridge RHIC/AGS Users’ Meeting June 20, 05](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070406/56814122550346895dacf645/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Contents Big Bang Basic Framework �
Nuclear Particles in the Early �Universe; Limiting Temperature?
Thermal Quarks and Gluons; �Experimental Evidence
If I can understand it, so can you!
![Page 4: Paul Stankus Oak Ridge RHIC/AGS Users’ Meeting June 20, 05](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070406/56814122550346895dacf645/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Henrietta Leavitt American
Distances via variable stars
Edwin Hubble American
Galaxies outside Milky Way
The original Hubble Diagram“A Relation Between Distance and Radial Velocity Among Extra-Galactic Nebulae” E.Hubble (1929)
![Page 5: Paul Stankus Oak Ridge RHIC/AGS Users’ Meeting June 20, 05](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070406/56814122550346895dacf645/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
USUS USUS
Now
Slightly Earlier
As seen from our position: As seen from another position:
Recessional velocity distance
Same pattern seen by all observers!
![Page 6: Paul Stankus Oak Ridge RHIC/AGS Users’ Meeting June 20, 05](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070406/56814122550346895dacf645/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Original Hubble diagram
Freedman, et al. Astrophys. J. 553, 47 (2001)
1929: H0 ~500 km/sec/Mpc
2001: H0 = 727 km/sec/Mpc
t
x
UsGalaxies
?
vRecession = H0 d
1/H0 ~ 1010 year ~ Age of the Universe?
1/H
0
W. Freedman American
Modern Hubble constant (2001)
![Page 7: Paul Stankus Oak Ridge RHIC/AGS Users’ Meeting June 20, 05](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070406/56814122550346895dacf645/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
H.P. Robertson American
A.G. Walker British
W. de Sitter Dutch
Albert Einstein German
A. Friedmann Russian
G. LeMaitre Belgian
Formalized most general form of isotropic and homogeneous universe in GR “Robertson-Walker metric” (1935-6)
General Theory of Relativity (1915); Static, closed universe (1917)
Vacuum-energy-filled universes “de Sitter space” (1917)
Evolution of homogeneous, non-static (expanding) universes “Friedmann models” (1922, 1927)
![Page 8: Paul Stankus Oak Ridge RHIC/AGS Users’ Meeting June 20, 05](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070406/56814122550346895dacf645/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
€
dτ 2 = −ds2 = dt 2 − a(t)[ ]2dχ 2
a(t) dimensionless; set a(now) =1
χ has units of length
a(t)Δχ = physical separation at time t
Robertson-Walker Metric€
dτ 2 = −ds2 = dt 2 − dx 2
H. Minkowski German
“Henceforth space by itself, and time by itself, are doomed to fade away into mere shadows, and only a kind of union of the two will preserve an independent reality" (1907)
Minkowski Metric
![Page 9: Paul Stankus Oak Ridge RHIC/AGS Users’ Meeting June 20, 05](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070406/56814122550346895dacf645/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
t
t1
t2
Photons
Us Galaxies at rest in the “Hubble flow”
t
t=now
€
χ = constant
"At rest in the Hubble flow"
Galaxies
€
dτ = 0 ⇒dt
dχ= ±a(t)
Photons€
H(t) =velocity
distance=
d
dta(t)Δχ[ ]
a(t)Δχ=
˙ a (t)
a(t)
Hubble Constant
A photon’s period grows a(t)
Its coordinate wavelength is constant; its physical wavelength a(t) grows a(t)
(t2)/(t1) = a(t2)/a(t1) 1+z
Cosmological Red Shift
Robertson-Walker Coordinates
![Page 10: Paul Stankus Oak Ridge RHIC/AGS Users’ Meeting June 20, 05](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070406/56814122550346895dacf645/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
a(t) a Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) cosmology
Three basic solutions for a(t):
1. Relativistic gas, “radiation dominated”
P/ = 1/3 a-4 a(t)t1/2
2. Non-relativistic gas, “matter dominated”
P/ = 0 a-3 a(t)t2/3
3. “Cosmological-constant-dominated” or “vacuum-energy-dominated”
P/ = -1 constant a(t)eHt “de Sitter space”
![Page 11: Paul Stankus Oak Ridge RHIC/AGS Users’ Meeting June 20, 05](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070406/56814122550346895dacf645/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
The New Standard Cosmology in Four Easy Steps
Inflation, dominated by “inflaton field” vacuum energy
Radiation-dominated thermal equilibrium
Matter-dominated, non-uniformities grow (structure)
Start of acceleration in a(t), return to domination by cosmological constant and/or vacuum energy.
w=P/
-1/3
+1/3
-1
aeHt at1/2 at2/3
t
now
acc
dec
![Page 12: Paul Stankus Oak Ridge RHIC/AGS Users’ Meeting June 20, 05](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070406/56814122550346895dacf645/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
€
dE = TdS − PdVBasic
Thermodynamics
Sudden expansion, fluid fills empty space without loss of energy.
dE = 0 PdV > 0 therefore dS > 0
Gradual expansion (equilibrium maintained), fluid loses energy through PdV work.
dE = -PdV therefore dS = 0Isentropic Adiabatic
Hot
Hot
Hot
Hot
Cool
![Page 13: Paul Stankus Oak Ridge RHIC/AGS Users’ Meeting June 20, 05](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070406/56814122550346895dacf645/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Golden Rule 1: Entropy per co-moving volume is conserved
Golden Rule 3: All chemical potentials are negligible
Golden Rule 2: All entropy is in relativistic species
Expansion covers many decades in T, so typically either T>>m (relativistic) or T<<m (frozen out)
€
Entropy S in co - moving volume Δχ( )3preserved
Relativistic gas S
V≡ s = sParticle Type
Particle Type
∑ =2π 2
45
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟T 3
Particle Type
∑ =2π 2
45
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟g∗S T 3
g∗S ≡ effective number of relativistic species
Entropy density S
V=
S
Δχ( )3
1
a3=
2π 2
45g∗S T 3
€
T ∝ g∗S( )− 1
31
aGolden Rule 4:
![Page 14: Paul Stankus Oak Ridge RHIC/AGS Users’ Meeting June 20, 05](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070406/56814122550346895dacf645/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
g*S1 Billion oK 1 Trillion oK
Start with light particles, no strong nuclear force
![Page 15: Paul Stankus Oak Ridge RHIC/AGS Users’ Meeting June 20, 05](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070406/56814122550346895dacf645/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
g*S1 Billion oK 1 Trillion oK
Previous Plot
Now add hadrons = feel strong nuclear force
![Page 16: Paul Stankus Oak Ridge RHIC/AGS Users’ Meeting June 20, 05](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070406/56814122550346895dacf645/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
g*S1 Billion oK 1 Trillion oK
Previous Plots
Keep adding more hadrons….
![Page 17: Paul Stankus Oak Ridge RHIC/AGS Users’ Meeting June 20, 05](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070406/56814122550346895dacf645/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
How many hadrons?
Density of hadron mass states dN/dM increases exponentially with mass.
Prior to the 1970’s this was explained in several ways theoretically
Statistical Bootstrap Hadrons made of hadrons made of hadrons…
Regge Trajectories Stretchy rotators, first string theory
€
dN
dM~ exp M
TH
⎛ ⎝ ⎜ ⎞
⎠ ⎟
Broniowski, et.al. 2004TH ~ 21012 oK
![Page 18: Paul Stankus Oak Ridge RHIC/AGS Users’ Meeting June 20, 05](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070406/56814122550346895dacf645/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Rolf Hagedorn GermanHadron bootstrap model and limiting temperature (1965)
€
E ~ E i gi
states i
∑ exp −E i /T( ) ~ EdN
dE∫ exp −E /T( ) dE
€
E ~ MdN
dM∫ exp −M /T( ) dM now add in
dN
dM~ exp M /TH( )
~ M∫ exp −M1
T−
1
TH
⎡
⎣ ⎢
⎤
⎦ ⎥
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟ dM
Ordinary statistical mechanics:
For thermal hadron gas (somewhat crudely):
Energy diverges as T --> TH
Maximum achievable temperature?
“…a veil, obscuring our view of the very beginning.” Steven Weinberg, The First Three Minutes (1977)
![Page 19: Paul Stankus Oak Ridge RHIC/AGS Users’ Meeting June 20, 05](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070406/56814122550346895dacf645/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Karsch, Redlich, Tawfik, Eur.Phys.J.C29:549-556,2003
/T4
g*S
D. GrossH.D. PolitzerF. Wilczek
American
QCD Asymptotic Freedom (1973)
“In 1972 the early universe seemed hopelessly opaque…conditions of ultrahigh temperatures…produce a theoretically intractable mess. But asymptotic freedom renders ultrahigh temperatures friendly…” Frank Wilczek, Nobel Lecture (RMP 05)
QCD to the rescue!
Replace Hadrons (messy and numerous)
by Quarks and Gluons (simple
and few)
Ha
dro
n g
as
Thermal QCD ”QGP” (Lattice)
![Page 20: Paul Stankus Oak Ridge RHIC/AGS Users’ Meeting June 20, 05](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070406/56814122550346895dacf645/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Kolb & Turner, “The Early Universe”
QC
D T
rans
ition
e+e- A
nnih
ilatio
n
Nuc
leos
ynth
esis
D
ecou
plin
g
Mes
ons
free
ze o
ut
Hea
vy q
uark
s an
d bo
sons
free
ze o
ut
“Before [QCD] we could not go back further than 200,000 years after the Big Bang. Today…since QCD simplifies at high energy, we can extrapolate to very early times when nucleons melted…to form a quark-gluon plasma.” David Gross, Nobel Lecture (RMP 05)
Thermal QCD -- i.e. quarks and
gluons -- makes the very early universe tractable; but where is the experimental
proof?
g*S
![Page 21: Paul Stankus Oak Ridge RHIC/AGS Users’ Meeting June 20, 05](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070406/56814122550346895dacf645/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
National Research Council Report (2003)
Eleven Science Questions for the New
Century
Question 8 is:
![Page 22: Paul Stankus Oak Ridge RHIC/AGS Users’ Meeting June 20, 05](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070406/56814122550346895dacf645/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Also: BNL-AGS, CERN-SPS, CERN-LHC
BNL-RHIC Facility
![Page 23: Paul Stankus Oak Ridge RHIC/AGS Users’ Meeting June 20, 05](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070406/56814122550346895dacf645/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Side-to-beam view
Along-the-beam view
Hot Zone
Au+Au at √sNN = 200 GeV
STAR Experiment at RHIC
![Page 24: Paul Stankus Oak Ridge RHIC/AGS Users’ Meeting June 20, 05](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070406/56814122550346895dacf645/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Low High
Low High
Density, PressurePressure Gradient
Initial (10-24 sec) Thermalized Medium Early
Later
Fast
Slow
€
v2 =px
2 − py2
px2 + py
2
Elliptic momentum anisotropy
![Page 25: Paul Stankus Oak Ridge RHIC/AGS Users’ Meeting June 20, 05](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070406/56814122550346895dacf645/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
PHENIX Data
Fluid dynamics predicts momentum anisotropy correctly for 99% of particles
produced in Au+Au
• Strong self-re-interaction
• Early thermalization (10-24 sec)
• Low dissipation (viscosity)
• Equation of state P/ similar to relativistic gas
What does it mean?
![Page 26: Paul Stankus Oak Ridge RHIC/AGS Users’ Meeting June 20, 05](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070406/56814122550346895dacf645/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Beam energy
• High acceleration requires high P/ pressure/energy density. Hagedorn picture would be softer since massive hadrons are non-relativistic.
• Increase/saturate with higher energy densities. In Hagedorn picture pressure decreases with density.
Momentum anisotropy increases as we increase beam energy & energy density
What does it mean?
![Page 27: Paul Stankus Oak Ridge RHIC/AGS Users’ Meeting June 20, 05](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070406/56814122550346895dacf645/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Thermal photon radiation from
quarks and gluons?
Ti> 500 MeV
Direct photons from nuclear collisions suggest initial temperatures > TH
![Page 28: Paul Stankus Oak Ridge RHIC/AGS Users’ Meeting June 20, 05](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070406/56814122550346895dacf645/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
1. B violation2. C,CP violation
3. Out of equilibrium
Sakharov criteria for baryogenesis
Most of the early universe is QCD!
Dissipation could be relevant here:
Mean Free Path ~ de Broglie
€
η Shear viscosity
s Entropy density< ~ 0.1
Quantum Limit! “Perfect Fluid!”
Ideal gas Ideal fluidLong mfp Short mfp
High dissipation Low dissipation
Data imply (D. Teaney):
![Page 29: Paul Stankus Oak Ridge RHIC/AGS Users’ Meeting June 20, 05](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070406/56814122550346895dacf645/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Conclusions•The early universe is straightforward to describe, given simplifying assumptions of isotropy, homogeneity, and thermal equilibrium.
•Strong interaction/hadron physics made it hard to understand T > 100 MeV ~ 1012 K.
•Transition to thermal QCD makes high temperatures tractable theoretically; but we are only now delivering on a 30-year-old promise to test it experimentally.
![Page 30: Paul Stankus Oak Ridge RHIC/AGS Users’ Meeting June 20, 05](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022070406/56814122550346895dacf645/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
References
Freedman & Turner, “Measuring and understanding the universe”, Rev Mod Phys 75, 1433 (2003)
Kolb & Turner, The Early Universe, Westview (1990)
Dodelson, Modern Cosmology, Academic Press (2003)
Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology, Wiley (1972)
Weinberg, The First Three Minutes, Basic (1977, 1993)
Schutz, A First Course in General Relativity, Cambridge (1985)
Misner, Thorne, Wheeler, Gravitation, W.H.Freeman (1973)