Opportunities for Solar Industrial Process Heat in the United States
Colin McMillan, Carrie Schoeneberger, Parthiv Kurup, and Jingyi Zhang
February 3, 2021NREL/PR-6A20-79083
NREL | 2
Agenda
1. Analysis framing2. Industrial process heat (IPH)3. Solar generation4. Opportunities for solar for IPH5. Conclusions and future
research6. Q&A
Colin McMillan, NREL
Jingyi Zhang, Northwestern University
Parthiv Kurup, NREL
Carrie Schoeneberger, Northwestern University
Colin McMillan, NREL
Robert Margolis, NRELEric Masanet, Northwestern
University/UC Santa BarbaraWilliam Xi, NREL
Analysis Framing
NREL | 4
Analysis Introduction
• Industrial process heat (IPH) is the transfer of heat to a material within a production process by convection, conduction, or radiation
• The potential to use of solar technologies (solar thermal and PV) for meeting IPH in the United States is an understudied and important topic
• The motivating research questions are:1. What are the geographic, temporal, and
operational characteristics of IPH demand in the United States?
2. What is the county-by-county opportunity to meet IPH demand with solar technologies? Adapted from Schoeneberger et al. (2020)
Solar Process Heat Installations (2019)
NREL | 5
Why Industrial Process Heat (IPH)?
• IPH is a major use of energy in the United States– Industry is second-largest user of energy, behind transportation
sector– IPH is the majority of fuel energy use by industry, equivalent to
~40% of transportation sector and ~28% of residential and commercial buildings combined
• Nearly all IPH energy is provided by fuel combustion– Mostly fossil fuels
U.S. DOE. “Manufacturing Energy and Carbon Footprints (2014 MECS),” 2018. https://www.energy.gov/eere/amo/manufacturing-energy-and-carbon-footprints-2014-mecs.EIA. “Monthly Energy Review.” Energy consumption by sector, 2018. http://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/monthly/#consumption.
NREL | 6
Why Solar for IPH?
Adapted from Schoeneberger et al. (2020)
Solar technologies are well-matched to the temperature demands of IPH in the U.S.But, what about temporal and geographic characteristics of IPH demands?
U.S. Cumulative IPH Demand by Temperature in 2014
NREL | 7
Analysis Framework and Approach
Overall approach is to characterize hourly IPH loads and match them with the appropriate hourly supply of solar heat.
Fuel demand for heat at the unit process
Estimated hourly, county-
level fuel use
Technology limitations
Process heat
demand
Supply of solar heat
Geospatial and temporal solar
resource modeling
Process heat generated
End-useefficiency
NREL | 8
Analysis Scope
Opportunity for SIPH is defined as the fraction of process heat demand that can be provided by solar technologies, given available solar resources and land area
Includes Excludes
County-average solar resource County total land availability IPH unit process detail, including
temperature, heat media, and boiler type
Hourly heat load and solar generation Uncertainty ranges of typical operating
schedules
Site-level analysis Economic considerations Battery storage Multiple varieties of a single solar
technology type Emerging solar technologies Hawaii, Alaska, and Puerto Rico
NREL | 9
Analysis Contributions
• Analysis is a first, key step to exploring how solar IPH technologies could be relevant for U.S. industries
• Expand solar for IPH to include PV-connected electrotechnologies
• Results are useful at the national, state, and local levels
• Publicly-available resources for continued analysis– Data sets on IPH characterization, load shapes– Interactive results viewer – Open-source code
https://www.nrel.gov/analysis/solar-industrial-process-heat.html
Industrial Process Heat
NREL | 11
IPH Data Disaggregation
IPH Characteristic Existing Detail New Disaggregation
GeographicCounty (NREL), Census Region
(EIA MECS) County
Temporal Annual Hourly
Operational – Temperature None Process temperature
Operational – ProcessGeneral end use (e.g.,
conventional boiler, process heating)
General end use with equipment efficiencies and
capacities
NREL | 12
Matching Solar Technologies with IPH Applications
Conventional boiler (steam and hot water)
Conventional boiler, CHP, process heat
Conventional boiler, CHP, process heat
Conventional boiler, CHP; hot water (<90°C)
Parabolic trough collector (w/wo 6-hr thermal energy storage)
Flat plate collector (w/ water storage)
Linear Fresnel, direct steam generation
Waste heat recovery HP (WPRHP)Conventional boiler, CHP, process heat
PVResistance heater
Ambient heat pump (HP) (w/ water storage)
Electric boiler
Conventional boiler, CHP; hot water (<90°C)
Solar TechnologiesConventional IPH Technologies and Applications
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
Conventional IPH technology and application
Solar technology
IPH electrotechnology
7 solar “technology packages”
NREL | 13
Process Heat Technologies: Electrotechnologies
• In addition to modeling boilers and CHP, electrotechnologies were selected based on criteria for technical potential– PV+ [ambient HP, electric boiler, resistance heating, and waste heat
recovery HP (WHRHP)]– Selection based on weighted scoring of technical potential to replace
conventional technologies, data sufficiency, and market growth potential
NREL | 14
Electrotechnology Screening
Electrotechnologies
Technical Potential for Conventional Fuel Replacement
Weighted Scoreof Technical Potential
Data Availability
Weighted Score of Modeling Confidence
Market Growth Outlook
Weighted Score of Market Growth Outlook
Overall Score
Electric boiler 3 6 3 3 3 3 12Ambient heat pump 3 6 3 3 2 2 11Resistance heating and melting
3 6 3 3 2 2 11
Waste recovery heat pumps
2 4 3 3 3 3 10
Induction heating and melting
2 4 3 3 3 3 10
Infrared processing 2 4 3 3 3 3 10Microwave heating and drying
2 4 3 3 3 3 10
Radio-frequency heating and drying
2 4 3 3 3 3 10
Direct arc melting 2 2 3 3 3 3 10UV (ultraviolet) curing
1 2 3 3 3 3 8
Plasma processing 1 2 3 3 2 2 7Vacuum melting 1 2 2 2 3 3 7Laser processing 1 2 3 3 2 2 7Ladle refining 1 2 1 1 1 1 4
NREL | 15
Technical Potential of Replacing Conventional Boilers with e-Boilers
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
TBtu
Total fuel usage
TBtu replaced
2014 conventional boiler fuel use (TBtu/yr)
Fossil fuel 827
Fossil fuel 827
Other fuel 932
Total 1759
Technical potential
Boiler fuel replacement
52%
TBtureplacement
916
The result assumes single boiler replacement with a maximum e-boiler capacity of 190 MMBtu/hr
NREL | 16
Technical potential of waste heat recovery heat pumps (WHRHPs)
020406080
100120
Food
man
ufac
turin
g
Beve
rage
Text
ile m
ills
Woo
d pr
oduc
tm
anuf
actu
ring
Pape
r man
ufac
turin
g
petro
leum
and
coa
lpr
oduc
tsm
anuf
actu
ring
Che
mic
alm
anuf
actu
ring
Non
met
aalic
min
eral
prod
uct
man
ufac
turin
gFa
bric
ated
Met
alPr
oduc
tM
anuf
actu
ring
311 312 313 321 322 324 325 327 332
Tech
nica
l Pot
entia
l (TB
tu) Waste heat recovery
Input work/heatOutput heat
Waste heat recovery = Input fuel × waste heat fraction × waste heat not recoveredOutput heat = Input work or heat × COP -> Input work or heat = waste heat recovery/(COP-1)
Total
Input work/heat (TWh)
3.60E+01
Waste heat recovery (TBtu)
3.30E+02
Output heat (TBtu)
4.53E+02
Solar Generation
NREL | 18
Solar Resource and Land
• Significant solar resource across the US:– GHI: Range is 1,000 – 2,500 kWh/m2/year– DNI: Range is 1,450 – 2,740 kWh/m2/year
• Solar IPH suitability across the US– Huge potential for PV for heat– For CSP, Southwest, but also across the
country due to decreased resource need compared to electricity
• Land availability for SIPH typically in each state is greater than the land needed to meet all the state’s demands– Modelling using new exclusion criteria
NREL | 19
Solar Technology Packages and Applications
Conventional boiler (steam and hot water)
Conventional boiler, CHP, process heat
Conventional boiler, CHP, process heat
Conventional boiler, CHP; hot water (<90°C)
Parabolic trough collector (w/wo 6-hr thermal energy storage)
Flat plate collector (w/ water storage)
Linear Fresnel, direct steam generation
Waste heat recovery HP (WPRHP)Conventional boiler, CHP, process heat
PVResistance heater
Ambient heat pump (HP) (w/ water storage)
Electric boiler
Conventional boiler, CHP; hot water (<90°C)
Solar TechnologiesConventional IPH Technologies and Applications
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
Solar thermal technologies (1-3) are commercial for low (e.g., <90°C) and medium temperatures (e.g., 100-300° C)
PV-connected heat technologies (4-7) are still early stage• AC based: HP and WHRHP• DC based: eBoiler and
Resistance heater (90-1,800°C)
Conventional IPH technology and application
Solar technology
IPH electrotechnology
NREL | 20
Modelling
• NREL’s System Advisor Model (SAM), 2020.11.29• Technology parameters defined for the technology package
• NREL’s Renewable Energy Potential (reV) Model used to estimate generation by county
• Detailed spatiotemporal modeling assessment tool that calculates renewable energy capacity, generation, and cost based on geospatial intersection with grid infrastructure and land-use characteristics.
• Technology package from SAM run on reV, via high performance computing, for every county e.g., ~3000 times
• PV and Heat Pump• Models developed by Stephen Meyers • Hourly PV-generated electricity (from SAM output and reV JSON) is used to power a
heat pump that “lifts” heat from ambient air into water that is stored and subsequently used to heat a process load at its desired temperature
Opportunities for SIPH
NREL | 22
Process-level Heat Demand by Industrial Subsector
Food
Pulp & Paper
Petroleum products
Chemicals
Metals
Non-metallic minerals
Beverages
Wood products
• Shows how much process-level heat demand each technology could theoretically meet within a given subsector
• Highest potential demand in pulp & paper, chemicals, petroleum, and food
NREL | 23
Opportunities for SIPH by Technology
• Based on hourly calculations of solar fractions• Shows total annual heat potential by solar technology in TBtu and as a fraction of total IPH
demand for the technology• Overall, highest solar heat potential with concentrating collector technologies
Total solar heat potential
• in TBtu (bars)
• as the fraction of total IPH demand calculated for the technology (dots)
NREL | 24
Solar Heat Potential by Industrial Subsector
• Shows total annual solar heat potential within a few subsectors
• In subsectors with medium temp. steam needs, concentrating collectors have high potentials
• In metals, electric resistance heating has high potential
NREL | 25
Flat plate collector, with storage
Frequency of Solar Heat Fully Meeting Process Heat Demand
PV + Electric boiler Parabolic trough collector, with storage
Note: color bins are different per technology
• Based on hourly solar fraction: when the solar fraction is 1 or greater, solar heat can fully meet demand• Maps show how often during the year that solar heat is fully meeting demand in the county
Parabolic trough collector, no storage
NREL | 26
Comparison of Summer and Winter Sizing
• To compare the effect of solar system sizing, solar systems were scaled to meet peak load by county in summer (June) and winter (December)
• With winter sizing, solar technologies can meet heat demand more often
Flat plate collector, with storage
Summer sizing
Flat plate collector, with storage
Winter sizing
SWH = solar water heating; DSG = direct steam generation
NREL | 27
Land Use Requirements
FPC LF DSG PTC no TES PTC w/ TES E-boiler Resistance WHR HPs
Summer sizing 221 2,711 4,515 5,463 3,875 4,958 1,130
Winter sizing 521 7,385 14,620 18,960 6,533 8,127 1,911
Land use, totals in km2 As a comparison, Connecticut, the third smallest state by area, is 14,357 km2
Land use as percentage of available land (bars) & Total load in MW (dots)
• Land use is dependent on total heat load since solar systems were scaled to meet peak load
• More land required for PV electric heating systems
NREL | 28
Fuel Savings
• Amount of fuels displaced for each technology mirrors solar heat potential, with concentrating technologies highest
• Fuels displaced increases in summer months and varies by fuel types for a technology
Monthly total fuels displaced for LF and PV + Resistance heating
Total annual fuels displaced
NREL | 29
Summary Comparison of Technologies
• Shows how often during the year a technology fully meets heat demand and for how many counties where it can meet heat demand at least half the year
• Solar systems with thermal energy storage (PTC with TES and FPC) meet demand most often and for the most counties
Conclusions and Future Research
NREL | 31
Conclusions
• First national level analysis for the U.S., conducted at the county level• Solar thermal and PV heat technologies can meet many temperature
needs; nearly 25% of 2014 IPH demand• Most counties have sufficient available land, although site-specific
details matter– On average only 5% of land is needed– However, site assessment for individual facilities is needed to
determine economic viability
• Key insight: All CONUS states can readily benefit from solar heat technologies, and meet a large portion of their IPH demand
• Key insight: possible for heating technologies to reduce CO2 emissions by ~15%
• Key insight: thermal energy storage is a key for solar IPH success
NREL | 32
Importance of Thermal Energy Storage (TES)
Parabolic trough collector, no storage Parabolic trough collector, with storage
• Comparison of hourly solar fraction, averaged for the month, between PTC with and without TES for Polk County, Iowa
• Large, energy-intensive industries tend to run continuously• TES extends the hours when solar fully meets demand, leading to more fuel savings and emissions reductions
NREL | 33
Future Research
Just the start and more research is needed!• Higher resolution analysis
– Location-specific modeling to match the supply and demand e.g., 500m to the site, land available, heat transport, specific site load demands and integration
• Increased options for energy storage– Thermal batteries e.g., grid tied to pull low-cost renewable electricity– Electric batteries to couple with the PV-based systems
• Increased integration efforts for viability– Unlike electricity, heat is not as fungible, and needs proper integration
• Facility decision support – Solar heat supply side considerations (e.g., different technologies)
coupled to the user inputs e.g., load, natural gas use and land
www.nrel.gov
Thank you! Q&A
https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy21osti/77760.pdf
This work was authored in part by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, operated by Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308. Funding provided by U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Solar Energy Technologies Office. The views expressed in the article do not necessarily represent the views of the DOE or the U.S. Government. The U.S. Government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the U.S. Government retains a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this work, or allow others to do so, for U.S. Government purposes.
McMillan, Colin, Carrie Schoeneberger, Jingyi Zhang, Parthiv Kurup, Eric Masanet, Robert Margolis, Steven Meyers, Mike Bannister, Evan Rosenlieb, and William Xi. 2021.Opportunities for Solar Industrial Process Heat in the United States. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. NREL/TP-6A20-77760.
Backup
Solar Supply
NREL | 37
Process Heat Technologies
Solar technology Characteristics Applicable end use Limited to
FPC Temperature, 90oCUses: hot water, boiler feedwater preheating Conventional boiler, CHP Hot water only
CSP Temperature, 400oCUses: steam, direct proc. heat Conventional boiler, CHP, PH Process temp <340oC
PV + HP (ambient) Temperature, <90oCUses: hot water Conventional boiler Hot water only
PV + electric boiler Uses: steam, hot water Conventional boiler Capacity<50MW
PV + resistance Temperature, 1800oC Uses: furnaces, ovens, kilns PH, Conventional boiler, CHP
Process temp <1800oC, relevant unit processes and industries
PV + HP (waste heat)
Temperature, 160oCUses: steam, hot water, hot air Conventional Boiler, CHP, PH Relevant unit processes and
industries
NREL | 38
Land Exclusion CriteriaData Set Criteria
SlopeSlopes greater than 3% (for parabolic trough) or 5% (for PV or FPC)
Urban Areas
Suburban areasUrban areas
Land Cover
Open waterWoody wetlandsEmergent herbaceous wetlandsDeciduous forestEvergreen forestMixed forest
BLM ACEC
Bureau of Land Management areas of critical environmental concern
Federal Lands
National battlefieldNational conservation areaNational fish hatcheryNational monumentNational parkNational recreation areaNational scenic areaNational wilderness areaNational wildlife refugeWild and scenic riverWildlife management areaNational forest
Data Set Criteria
Federal Lands (cont.)
National grassland
U.S. Air Force Guard landU.S. Air Force landU.S. Army landU.S. Army Guard landU.S. Coast Guard landU.S. Marine Corps landU.S. Navy landMixed forest
Airports Airports
Protected Areas Database of the United States
Status 1: an area having permanent protection from conversion of natural land cover and a mandated management plan in operation to maintain a natural state within which disturbance events (of natural type, frequency, intensity, and legacy) are allowed to proceed without interference or are mimicked through managementStatus 2: an area having permanent protection from conversion of natural land cover and a mandated management plan in operation to maintain a primarily natural state, but which may receive uses or management practices that degrade the quality of existing natural communities, including suppression of natural disturbance.
National Conservation Easement Database
Status 1: managed for biodiversity: disturbance events proceed or are mimickedStatus 2: managed for biodiversity: disturbance events suppressed
NREL | 39
Solar Technology Packages
Technology Package
MWth of Solar Field
MWth at the Heat
ExchangerHTF
Volume of TES/Hours of Storage
Collector/Type Total Land AreaAperture Area/
Absorption Area (m2)
Solar water heating-FPC
1.0 ~1.27 Glycol 60 m3 Heliodyne Gobi 410 001 ~0.5 acres 2,014 m2
CSP: oil trough, no TES
1.5 1.00 Therminol-VP-1 0 SkyFuel SkyTrough ~2 acres/~8,094 m2
2,624 m2
CSP: oil trough, 6 hours of TES
2.5 1.00 Therminol-VP-1 6 hours SkyFuel SkyTrough ~4 acres/~16,187 m2
5,248 m2
CSP with DSG LF collector, no TES
1.2 1.00 Water/Steam mix
0 Novatec ~1 acre/~3,698 m2
3,082 m2
PV DC for connection to resistive heater and eBoiler
1.2 NA NA NA Standard module from PVWATTs Calculator with fixed open rack
In SAM output In SAM output
For PV AC, the same solar field is used, but 1 MWe is used as the system size. DC : AC inverter ratio = 1.2
Defined as ~1 MW systems; scaled by sizing to winter peak and summer peak, system footprint, and available land area
NREL | 40
SAM Technology Parameters ExamplesDirect Heating - Direct Steam Generation Linear Fresnel CollectorsIndirect Heating - Direct Steam Generation Linear Fresnel Collectors
Unit Process Calculations
NREL | 42
Technical potential of Resistance Heating and Melting
0
100
200
300
400
500
Food
and
bev
erag
e
Beve
rage
Petr
oleu
m a
nd c
oal
prod
ucts
man
ufac
turin
g
Chem
ical
man
ufac
turin
g
Non
met
allic
min
eral
prod
uct m
anuf
actu
ring
Prim
ary
met
alm
anuf
actu
ring
311 312 324 325 327 331
Tech
nica
l pot
entia
l (TB
tu)
Total = 1,834 TBtu
NREL | 43
Calculating Process Heat Demand
Results Backup
NREL | 45
Opportunities: Calculation Framework
IPH Demand
Annual thermal energy demand
County-level energy by fuel type, industry, industry size class, and end use
Process characteristics
- Efficiency of end uses (boiler, CHP)
- Process limitations: temperature, form of heat (steam, hot water, etc.)
Hourly process heat demand
- Thermal energy required by process
- Representative hourly load shape
Solar Generation
Solar heat from reV
Process characteristics
- Heat exchange (HTF from field to process)
- Electrical efficiency of electro-technology
- MWth from solar field
- MWe from PV array
Hourly process heat supply
- Process heat supply, hourly
Opportunity (% fossil fuel replaced) =∑𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒 𝑝𝑝𝑒𝑒𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑒𝑒𝑝𝑝 𝑡𝑡𝑝𝑝 𝑝𝑝𝑒𝑒𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑒𝑒𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝 𝑏𝑏𝑒𝑒 𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑒 𝑡𝑡𝑒𝑒𝑝𝑝𝑡𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐,ℎ𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑜𝑜
𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒 𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑝𝑝𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑝𝑝 𝑓𝑓𝑝𝑝𝑒𝑒 𝑝𝑝𝑒𝑒𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑒𝑒𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝 𝑡𝑒𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑡𝑡𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐,ℎ𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑜𝑜
Opportunity
NREL | 46
Comparison of summer and winter sizing
• Solar technologies meet demand more often with systems sized to meet peak load in winter
Frequency of meeting 100% of demand, all solar technologies
SWH = solar water heating; DSG = direct steam generation
NREL | 47
CO2 emissions savings
• CO2 emissions were calculated based on fuel savings and CO2emissions factors by fuel type
FPC LF DSG PTC no TES PTC w/ TES E-boiler Resistance WHR HPsSummer sizing 26.6 70.3 95.8 136.4 18.3 20.9 4.7Winter sizing 32.2 75.4 106.2 137.4 18.1 18.7 5.3
CO2 emissions savings (million metric tons)
EIA Monthly Energy Review, Table 11.4
• U.S. energy-related CO2 emissions from industry in 2014– 1500 million metric tons
NREL | 48
Land Use Requirements
PV + Electric boiler
Land use as percentage of available land
NREL | 49
Hourly process temperatures and solar supplied temperatures
T,so
lar –
T,pr
oces
s m
in (o C
)
• Colors indicate the temperature difference between the minimum required process temperature in Bee County, TX and the solar supplied heat for an FPC hot water heating system
• FPC achieves the required process temperature during daytime hours and into the night during summer, due to warmer ambient temperatures and the included storage
NREL | 50
Land use as a percentage of available land, histogram of counties
NREL | 51
Additional Electricity needed for PV+electrotechnologieswhen not meeting demand
Resistance WHR HPs
Summer sizing965
(944, 975)225
(221, 228)
Winter sizing642
(613, 659)218
(215, 220)
CHP Calculations
NREL | 53
Efficiency variations with partial thermal
loads of combustion/gas turbine CHPs
NREL | 54
Efficiency variations with partial thermal load of steam turbine CHPs