NSO Summer SchoolLecture 1:
Solar Wind Structure and Waves
Charles W. SmithSpace Science Center
University of New [email protected]
Good References:• Space Physics – May-Britt Kallenrode, Springer 2001.
(~ $70)
• Turbulence -- Uriel Frisch, Cambridge University Press 1995. (~ $35 to $55)
• Magnetohydrodynamic Turbulence – Dieter Biskamp, Cambridge 2003. (~ $110)
• The Solar Wind as a Turbulence Laboratory -- Bruno and Carbone, on line @ Living Reviews in Solar Physics (free)
Origin of the Solar Wind
Model drawn from many remote sensing methods:
Note rapid rise in temperature in so-called “transition region” around 2000 km about photosphere.
Source of heat is not known, although widely speculated upon.
Solar Wind Acceleration
Scatter plots of velocity as a function of distance for the emitted plasma puffs and solid line showing best fits to radial profile. These plots show the expected outflow that Solar Probe will encounter during its perihelion pass (Sheeley et al., 1997).
Heating the Solar Wind
1 AU ConditionsSolar wind speed, VSW, varies from 250 to 800 km/s.
(REarth = 6371 km, an 8 second transit at high wind speed.)
At least 2 transients have been observed at 2000 km/s at 1 AU!
Proton density varies, but averages about 10 p+/cm3.
We are unable to achieve these densities on the surface of the Earth.
Proton temperature averages about 105 K. (Vth ~ 50 km/s for ions.)
Magnetic clouds are colder (1/10’th), high speed streams are colder…
Magnetic field averages 6 to 8 nT and 45° from radial direction.
(BEarth = 5.7 x 104 nT at Washington DC.)
Can be just about anything at any time.
Have reached 55 nT during ACE era and << 1 nT.
Heavy ions (He++, He+, Fe?+, C?+, O?+, etc.) provide clues to origins.
Solar Wind Composition• About 96% is p+ and about 4% is He++.• The rest is:
Detailedcompositionmeasurementsattempt torefine physicsof acceleration.
Energy Output of the Sun
VSW ~ 300 to 800 km/s flowing away from sun
(averages ~1,000,000 miles/hr)
Stays ~ constant as it flows from the sun.
Tp ~ 4 x 104 to 2 x 105 K (Vpth ~ 50 km/s ~ Vs)
Np ~ 3 to 10 p+/cm3
Decreases ~ 1/R2 from sun.
|B| ~ 3 to 10 nT (1 nT = 10-5 G, BEarth = 0.5 G)
Decreases ~ 1/R from sun.
Solar output in light:
The solar constant is 135.3 mWatts/cm2 which corresponds to a radiant solar energy of ~1.4 GigaWatts/km2 (1.4 x 109 Watts/km2).
Multiplying by area of sphere 1 AU = 1.49 x 108 km in radius (4R2) gives solar output of light energy at 3.9 x 1026 Watts.
For comparison:
10 protons/cm3 traveling at 450 km/s has an energy flux density of…
(1/2) (MP NP VSW) VSW2 = 7.6 x 102 Watts/km2
Integrating over a 1 AU sphere, the sun’s energy production in the
solar wind is 2.1 x 1020 Watts.
Solar Activity 1992-1999
The Sun through the Eyes of SOHO
SOHO Project Scientist Team
Coronal mass ejections are plasma eruptions from the sun that are fast-moving.
They are predictable, but only approximately.
Some are self-contained magnetic structures called magnetic clouds that are observed to be cold at 1 AU.
Charge-state composition data strongly indicates they originate in hot electron environments.
Overexpansion is largely responsible for observed temperature at 1 AU.
In situ heating rate can be calculated from spectra.
These are Not Rare Events
Earth’s Magnetosphere
CME Interacting with Earth
Transient Arrival of
Bastille Day 2000
Over a week of extensive solar activity 3 shocks and associated ejecta arrived at Earth.
Each resulted in energetic particle enhancements to varying degrees.
Each resulted in magneto-spheric storm activity to varying degrees.
Shock Acceleration
Day 49, 1999 Upstream Waves“Classic” upstream wave spectrum for older, well-developed event (as expected).
Broad spectrum of upstream waves.
Not much polarization.
No real surprises here.
Upstream spectrum from prior to the onset of the SEP and ESP.
Power law form has no net polarization and there is a spectral break to form the dissipation range.
This is a typical undisturbed solar wind interval.
f5/3
Energetic Particle Populations Upstream of the Earth’s Bow Shock
Field-aligned beamSpecularly reflected ions
Gyrophase-bunched
Gyrotropic distributionIntermediate
distribution
Diffuse distribution
Quasi-Perpendicular
Quasi-Parallel
Diffuse ions
FAB
Ion
Fore
shoc
k B
ound
ary
B
GyrophaseBunched
I
Electrons
Earth
Proton Distribution Functions
Marsch, Phys. Inner Heliosphere 2, Chapter 8 (1991)
“Among the most typical features are…pronounced total temperature anisotropies with TP > TP|| and anisotropic cores in high-speed [winds] and… TP|| > TP and isotropic cores in low-speed [winds].”
Formalisms of Plasma Physics
• We can build a mathematical formalism for the theory of freely-interacting charged particles– Start with Maxwell’s equations governing E&M– Add the Boltzman equation from statistical
mechanics– Obtain the Maxwell-Vlasov equations of plasma
physics
• We can “simplify” this to a set of fluid equations– Magneto-fluid equations called the MHD equations– Generally applicable to low-frequency phenomena
Vlasov Equation
(Collisionless Boltzman’s Equation)
ss
ss
ss
s
ss
s
fdqt
fdqt
fcm
qf
t
tftc
tc
t
tct
t
t
vvxJ
vx
Bv
Evvx
ExJxB
BxE
xB
xE
),(
),(
0),,(
1),(
4),(
1),(
0),(
4),(
}
} Maxwell’s Equations governing Electro-Magnetic Fields
zyx
zyx
Charge density, currents, etc. are computed from the distribution of particles for all species
0BJB
BBVB
VV
VBBVVV
and 4
4
0or 0
4
1)(
22
2
c
c
t
t
Pt
MM
M
Let’s Do 5 Things Today:
1. Examine global structure of heliosphere
2. Examine properties of fluctuations
3. Compute wave solutions to MHD
4. Ask: Can waves heat the solar wind?• Nope! They can’t without something more.
5. Begin to re-examine properties of fluctuations
1. Global StructureWind speed is independent of heliocentric distance.
Density ~ R2
IMF wound in a spiral
|B| ~ R2 inside 2 AU
~ R1 outside 2 AU
VA = (B02/4NPmP)1/2
~ constant
P = eB0/mPc ~ |B|
1b. VSW is not Function of R
Richardson et al., GRL, 22, 325, 1995.
Density multiplied by R2.
1c. NP Varies as R2
2-2 R ~Density so R ~ surface
constant depth
depth x surface ~ Volume
Volumenumber / total~Density
A1
A2 =
A1 (R2/R1)2
1d. Adiabatic Expansion
s-Joules/kg 106.3 that so
2/33
4
5SWP
BSW
PPP
VTx
kV
m
R
T
dR
dT
4/3P
PP
R~T that so
0R
T
3
4
dR
dT
Vasquez et al., J. Geophys. Res., 112, A07101 (2007).
1e. Radial IMF
2
2
1RR
2R1R
3
R
R1B 2B so
AB AB
xd 0B
Flux of IMF through closed surfaces surrounding the sun is constant.
1f. Azimuthal IMF
RRS
2
0R0
1R
1RS
20R0
1RR0
20
220R0
S00
R000RR
RR
RR
/VBR RR
RBV B
0 /RV :const.RV
momentum,angular by determined is V
RV /RVRB B
RV BR R/RBRV B
R V rotation solar
BVR BVBVR
const. BVBVR
0 BVBVRR
1
0 BV
S-
S
R
Note error in Kallenrode book!
1g. IMF Intensity and Direction
2
SW2
20
022
RR
SWRS
2
0R0R
V
R1
R
RBBB |B| and R ~
B
B
/VBRB and R
RB B
S
Solar Wind Structure (Magnetic)Expanding solar wind draws sun’s magnetic field outward as sun rotates underneath to create a spiral interplanetary magnetic field (IMF).
IMF winding results from a “connect-the-dots” approach to plasma elements moving outward and sun rotating.
sin)/)(/(),,(
,0),,( ,)/(),,(
110
21
0
rrVrBrB
rBrrBrB
SWSR
RR
The Solar Wind Continues Flowing Outward, Away from the Sun
• Studied by Pioneers 10 & 11– Had enough power to function to 35 AU
• Studied by Voyagers 1 & 2– Still operating at ~100 AU– Recall crossing of termination region crossing
• To a lesser degree:– Cassini, Galileo, and other planetary missions
Solar Wind Properties
• At 1 AU:– VSW ~ 300-800 km/s
– Np ~ 10 p+/cm3
– Tp ~ 105 K
– |B| ~ 6 nT BR ~ 45
• At 100 AU:– VSW ~ 450 km/s
– Np ~ 103 p+/cm3
– Tp ~ 104 K
– |B| ~ 0.06 nT BR ~ 90
By 100 AU: Streams merge, gradients are smoothed, & few shocks remain,
Fluctuations are reduced, but persist,
Interstellar neutrals / pickup ions dominate pressure,
Thermal composition is unchanged.
2a. Properties of Fluctuations
• Low-frequency fluctuations tend to be:– Transverse to the mean magnetic field.
– Have low density compressions (/0~0.1).• Not generally well-correlated with fields.
– Correlated B and V fluctuations.• Indicative of outward propagation.
– Evolution of power consistent with WKB.– Reproducible power spectral form!
• Varying intensity.
Belcher & Davis, J. Geophys. Res., 76, 3534 (1971).
2b. Fluctuation Spectrum
Matthaeus et al., Phys. Res. Lett., 48, 1256 (1982).
The spectrum of magnetic fluctuations follows a predictable and reproducible form (power law with index ~ 5/3).
The magnetic helicity (polarization) is mixed.
2c. Fluctuation Spectrum
Podesta et al., J. Geophys. Res., 111, A10109, 2006.
M
0A
M
202
101
01
0110011
1
0110011
4
BV where
4
Bk
BBik4iBikBi
BVikVBikBVikBi
0Bik 0Vik
ikBBBBik4
1BBik
4
1Vi
M
MM
1
0BJB
BBVB
VV
VBBVVV
and 4
4
0or 0
4
1)(
22
2
c
c
t
t
Pt
MM
M
3a. Low-Frequency Waves
t-xki1
t-xki10
eV V
eBBB
Homework Problem:
• If you haven’t already, explore the MHD wave solutions that give Alfven and fast-mode waves in the fluid approximation.– Obtain dispersion relations, polarization,
fluctuation directions.
• If you haven’t already, review the kinetic theory descriptions of the same waves.– Obtain polarization and dissipation.
3b. Alfven and Fast-Mode Waves
• Alfven waves are:– Noncompressive– Transverse fluctuations– Right-hand polarized– Move energy parallel to
mean field– Decay via cyclotron
damping on ions– Decay via Landau
resonance (ions & electrons)
• Fast-Mode Waves:– Compressive for off-axis
propagation– Not transverse at off-axis
propagation– Left-hand polarized– Move energy across the
mean field for off-axis propagation
– Convert to whistler waves – Decay via cyclotron
damping on electrons– Decay via Landau
resonance (ions & electrons)
3c. So, Life is Good!
…or, is it?
4a. Can Waves Heat the Solar Wind?
In the range 0.3 < R < 1.0 AU, Helios observations demonstrate the following:
For VSW < 300 km/s, T ~ R -1.3 0.13
300 < VSW < 400 km/s, T ~ R -1.2 0.09
400 < VSW < 500 km/s, T ~ R -1.0 0.10
500 < VSW < 600 km/s, T ~ R -0.8 0.10
600 < VSW < 700 km/s, T ~ R -0.8 0.09
700 < VSW < 800 km/s, T ~ R -0.8 0.17
Why is this? It seems distinct from the high-latitude observations.
We can look to explain this through theory and link it to observations of the dissipation range and inferred spectral cascade rates.
Adiabatic expansion yields T ~ R-4/3.
Low speed wind expands without in situ heating!?
High speed wind is heated as it expands.
The slow wind continues to accelerate from 0.3 to 1 AU (due to in situ heating?), which complicated the analysis for years!
The temperature of all solar wind intervals 0.3 to 1 AU varies as R0.9!
All low-latitude winds are heated inside 1 AU!
Heating rate at 1 AU averages ~ 3 x 103 Joules/kg-s.
See Vasquez, J. Geophys. Res., 112, 2007.
4b. Can Waves Heat the Solar Wind?
Imagine that there is a spectrum of waves originating at the sun and propagating outward.
As the wave gets further from the sun, the mean magnetic field decreases and the cyclotron resonance shifts to lower frequencies (larger scales).
The spectrum of wave energy is slowly consumed from the high-frequency end.
Schwartz et al., JGR, 86, 541 (1981)
Homework Problem:
• Take the energy spectrum of solar wind fluctuations– Magnetic + Velocity
• Compute the rate of P 0 as R .• Compute the rate of energy input to the
solar wind by damping the static spectrum.• What is the local heating rate?• How long before the entire inertial range
energy is consumed?
Newborn Interstellar Pickup Ions
VSW
Interstellar neutral enter the heliosphere at small speeds, are ionized either by charged particle collision or photo-ionization, are “picked up” by the solar wind & IMF, and convected back to termination region.
In the process their circulation of the IMF provides “free energy” for exciting magnetic waves that can provide energy for heating the thermal plasma.
Waves Due to Pickup IonsTraditional plasma theory suggests that wave spectra due to pickup ions will reach LARGE enhancements in the background power levels (left, Lee & Ip, 1987).
They don’t! (below, Murphy et al., 1995)
Wave growth is slow and turbulent processes overwhelm the plasma kinetics of wave excitation (for once).
Pickup Ions Heat the Solar Wind
5a. Re-examine the Observations
• Are the fluctuations really waves at all?
• What is the orientation of k?– …and how did it get there?
• Is VB 0 indication of propagation?
• What happens when we add energy?– …where does it go?– …and how does it get there?
• What about that spectrum?
Summary• The heliosphere is vast, structured, and
containing a broad range of dynamics.– Filled with expanding, supersonic solar wind.– Transients and planetary interactions drive shocks
and particle acceleration.– Interstellar neutrals / ions provide new dynamics.
• Waves may explain (some of?) the fluctuations seen in the solar wind.– We will challenge this claim.
5b. Multi-D Correlation Fn.
Combining analyses of many intervals, adding correlation functions according to mean field direction, can lead to an understanding (statistically):
Matthaeus et al., J. Geophys. Res., 95, 20,673, 1990.
Bieber et al., J. Geophys. Res., 101, 2511, 1996 showed the 2D component dominates.
5c. Multi-D HC = VB
If there is a V and a B so that there is a VB, there must be sufficient energy to support VB.
Define C VB / EV+EB so that1 C +1
Milano et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 93(15), 155005 (2004).
5d. Breaking Apart the Maltese Cross
Combining analyses of many intervals, adding correlation functions according to mean field direction, can lead to an understanding (statistically):
Matthaeus et al., J. Geophys. Res., 95, 20,673, 1990.
Bieber et al., J. Geophys. Res., 101, 2511, 1996 showed the 2D component dominates.
Dasso et al., ApJ, 635, L181-184 (2005).
Slow wind is 2D
Fast wind is 1D
5e. Decay of HC (Cross-Correlation)
HC VB / V2+B2
Strong correlations evident at 1 AU disappear by ~ 4 AU.
Roberts et al., J. Geophys. Res., 92(10), 11021, 1987.
6a. A New View• Coleman, Phys. Rev.
Lett., 17, 207 (1966)
Fluctuations in the wind and IMF are presumed to be waves, most likely Alfven waves, that are remnant signatures propagating out from the solar corona.
• Coleman, Astrophys. J., 153, 371 (1968)
Fluctuations arise in situ as result of large-scale interplanetary sources such as wind shear and evolve non-linearly in a manner analogous to traditional hydro-dynamic turbulence.
6b. A New View
0.5 Hz
If the inertial range is a pipeline, the dissipation range consumes the energy at the end of the process.
f -1 “energy containing range”
f -5/3
“inertial range”
f -3
“dissipation range”
Few hours
Mag
netic
Pow
er
6.1
re whe
3/53/2
K
Kk
C
kCP
= V3/L
This is the essence of hydrodynamic turbulence applied to MHD!
Inertial rangespectrum ~ -5/3
Spectral steepening with dissipation
Grant, Stewart, and Moilliet, J. Fluid Mech., 12, 241-268, 1962.
Spectral steepening with dissipation
Inertial range spectrum ~ 5/3
Ion Inertial Scale
6c. A New View• Complications:
– MHD is not hydrodynamics!– …but it contains hydrodynamics!– There are multiple time scales.– There are wave dynamics.
• The mean field provides a direction of special importance!– The spectra are not isotropic.
• Can we build a theory of MHD turbulence that brings ideas from hydrodynamics into the problem?
• Dissipation is NOT provided by the fluid equation!– Dissipation marks the breakdown of the fluid approximation.– Going to need kinetic physics for dissipation!?!
What is Turbulence?
It is the nonlinear evolution of the fluid away from its initial state and
toward a self-determined state.
Weak Turbulence Theory
• One view, popular in plasma theory, is that turbulence is just the 2nd-order interaction of linear waves.– Oppositely propagating low-frequency waves interact
to produce a “daughter” wave propagating obliquely in a 3rd direction.
• Requires that transfer rates be slow compared with wave periods.
• Traditionally give suspect predictions(in my humble opinion)
Hydrodynamic Turbulence:Laminar vs. Turbulent Flow
Interacting vortices lead to distortion, stretching, and destruction (spawning).
One Example of Turbulence
Contributed by Pablo Dimitric of the Bartol Research Inst.
Navier-Stokes Equation
0V
VνP)V(Vt
Vρ 2
M
Mass DensityFluid Pressure
Dissipation of Energy
Incompressibility
(constant mass)
Convective derivative (time variability following the flow)
Energy Conservation
VνP)V(Vt
Vρ V 2
M
t
E
t
V
2
1
t
VV
2
0
00
VVVVVV
VV2
1V
2
1V)V(VV
222
2
Energy Conserving
Wave Vector Dynamics
VνP)V(Vt
Vρ 2
M
k
xikkeVV(x) If
k2
kkkk
k2kk
M VνkikPVikVt
Vρ
21
21
Dissipation at large wave numbers
MHD Equations
The Navier-Stokes equation represents a system where the nonlinear terms move energy without changing the total energy and viscosity dissipates energy at the smallest scales.
Can the MHD equations do something comparable?
0 and 4
4
0or 0
4
1)(
22
2
BJB
BBVB
VV
VBBVVV
c
c
t
t
Pt
MM
M
zyx
zyx
Over the Next Two Days:
• In Tuesday’s seminar we will explore one very powerful formulation for measuring the rate of energy cascade in the spectrum.
• In Wednesday’s class we will continue to explore the concepts of MHD turbulence.
Extra Slides
Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD)
JB
BBVB
VV
VBBVVV
c
c
t
t
Pt
MM
M
44
0or 0
4
1)(
22
2
zyx
zyx
Spectral steepeningwith dissipation
Ion inertial scaleInertial range spectrum ~ 5/ 3
There is a mathematical formalism that (we believe) describes the low-frequency fluctuations in the solar wind.
It is derived from a combination of Maxwell’s equations for E&M and statistical mechanics.
It attempts to present a fluid description for a plasma without particle collisions.
These equations break down when spatial (temporal) scales become smaller (faster) than the orbit of a proton.
There is a formal description to plasmas under these conditions.
Waves vs. Turbulence and more…
• Can we understand reproducible observations in basic terms?
• What are the universal processes of space physics?
• What can we assume of unmeasured and partially measured physics?
• Can we move toward a predictive understanding that gets dynamics right, or just qualities in general?
…and Why?
• Because waves are a relatively static phenomenon.– The propagate, but are reluctant to give up
their energy.
• Turbulence is an inherently dynamic phenomenon.– Energy moves through the spectrum
continuously and defines EVERYTHING!
Temperature Gradients R < 1 AU
In the range 0.3 < R < 1.0 AU, Helios observations demonstrate the following:
For VSW < 300 km/s, T ~ R -1.3 0.13
300 < VSW < 400 km/s, T ~ R -1.2 0.09
400 < VSW < 500 km/s, T ~ R -1.0 0.10
500 < VSW < 600 km/s, T ~ R -0.8 0.10
600 < VSW < 700 km/s, T ~ R -0.8 0.09
700 < VSW < 800 km/s, T ~ R -0.8 0.17
Why is this? It seems distinct from the high-latitude observations.
We can look to explain this through theory and link it to observations of the dissipation range and inferred spectral cascade rates.
Adiabatic expansion yields T ~ R-4/3.
Low speed wind expands without in situ heating!?
High speed wind is heated as it expands.
Before There Were Spacecraft…
• There were comet tails.
• Something blows the tailsof comets away from sun.
• Light pressure cannot explain it.
• Sometimes the tailsbecome disconnected.
1 AU Conditions (Near Earth)Solar wind speed, VSW, varies from 250 to 800 km/s.
(REarth = 6371 km, an 8 second transit at high wind speed.)
At least 2 transients have been observed at 2000 km/s at 1 AU!
Proton density varies, but averages about 10 p+/cm3.
We are unable to achieve these densities on the surface of the Earth.
Proton temperature averages about 105 K. (Vth ~ 50 km/s for ions.)
Magnetic clouds are colder (1/10’th).
Interplanetary magnetic field averages 6 to 8 nT and 45° from radial direction.
(BEarth = 5.7 x 104 nT at Boulder, Colorado.)
IMF can be just about anything at any time.
Have reached 55 nT during ACE era and << 1 nT.
Heavy ions (He++, He+, Fe?+, C?+, O?+, etc.) provide clues to origins.
Solar Activity 1992-1999
The Sun through the Eyes of SOHO
SOHO Project Scientist Team
Solar Wind Variability
While we will see there is all sorts of variability from one hour to the next, there is also a systematic variability tied to the solar cycle.
This reflects the Sun’s changing state with high-speed wind sources moving to new latitudes and multiple wind sources interacting.
This variability propagates into the outer heliosphere, forms merged regions of plasma that alter the propagation of galactic cosmic rays Earthward, and effects the acceleration of energetic particles within the heliosphere.
Solar Energetic Particles
Solar flares on Bastille Day 2000 marked the eruption of coronal magnetic fields and associated plasma.
This ejection resulted in the acceleration of ions and electrons via mechanisms still under study.
ACE observed the energetic particles arrived at Earth several days ahead of the ejecta.
Orbiting spacecraft were damaged or destroyed.
Loss of electrical power was threatened.
Astronauts were endangered.
Analysis: Day 49 of 1999“Classic” upstream wave spectrum for older, well-developed event (as expected).
Broad spectrum of upstream waves.
Not much polarization.
No real surprises here.
Upstream spectrum from prior to the onset of the SEP.
Power law form has no net polarization and there is a spectral break to form the dissipation range.
This is a typical undisturbed solar wind interval.
f5/3
Low-Frequency Waves• Alfven waves:
– Transverse magnetic and velocity fluctuations– No density compressions k B0 / (4)
• Fast Mode waves:– Some field-aligned V and B fluctuations– Some compression for off-axis propagation k B0 / (4)
Solar Wind Flow Near Sun
Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD)
JB
BBVB
VV
VBBVVV
c
c
t
t
Pt
MM
M
44
0or 0
4
1)(
22
2
zyx
zyx
Spectral steepeningwith dissipation
Ion inertial scaleInertial range spectrum ~ 5/ 3
There is a mathematical formalism that (we believe) describes the low-frequency fluctuations in the solar wind.
It is derived from a combination of Maxwell’s equations for E&M and statistical mechanics.
It attempts to present a fluid description for a plasma without particle collisions.
These equations break down when spatial (temporal) scales become smaller (faster) than the orbit of a proton.
There is a formal description to plasmas under these conditions.
JB
BBVB
VV
VBBVVV
c
c
t
t
Pt
MM
M
44
0or 0
4
1)(
22
2
zyx
zyx
A Model to Think About:
• All that energy has to go someplace!– All energy goes into heat.
• Will MHD turbulence (in analogy with hydrodynamic turbulence) converts large-scale energy into small-scale energy?
• Will combination of processes (mostly kinetic physics) converts collective motions into heat?– Cyclotron damping, Landau damping, current sheet
formation, etc….