Download - Muon (g-2)
![Page 1: Muon (g-2)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062408/5681342a550346895d9b19a9/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June 2005 - p. 1/36
Muon (g-2)
Past, Present and Future
B. Lee RobertsDepartment of Physics
Boston University
[email protected] http://physics.bu.edu/roberts.html
![Page 2: Muon (g-2)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062408/5681342a550346895d9b19a9/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June 2005 - p. 2/36
(in modern language)
673 (1924)
![Page 3: Muon (g-2)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062408/5681342a550346895d9b19a9/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June 2005 - p. 3/36
Dirac + Pauli moment
Schwinger term
![Page 4: Muon (g-2)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062408/5681342a550346895d9b19a9/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June 2005 - p. 4/36
The Muon Trio:• Lepton Flavor Violation
• Muon MDM (g-2) chiral changing
• Muon EDM
![Page 5: Muon (g-2)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062408/5681342a550346895d9b19a9/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June 2005 - p. 5/36
Muon (g-2) : Four Past Experiments
• CERN 1 - 1950s – SC precessed in a gradient field
• CERN 2 - 1960s– Dedicated Storage Ring, p = 1.28 GeV/c
• protons from PS injected into the storage ring
• CERN 3 - 1970s– Dedicated Storage Ring
• used injection + → decay to give the kick, The “magic” p3.09 GeV/c,
• BNL E821– Superconducting “superferric” storage ring
• magic , direct muon injection, fast non-ferric kicker
![Page 6: Muon (g-2)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062408/5681342a550346895d9b19a9/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June 2005 - p. 6/36
Spin Precession Frequencies: in B field
spin difference frequency = s - c
![Page 7: Muon (g-2)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062408/5681342a550346895d9b19a9/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June 2005 - p. 7/36
Use an E field for vertical focusing
spin difference frequency = s - c
0
![Page 8: Muon (g-2)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062408/5681342a550346895d9b19a9/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June 2005 - p. 8/36
Spin Precession Frequencies: in B field with both an MDM and EDM
The EDM causes the spin to precess out of plane.
The motional E - field, β X B, is much stronger than laboratory electric fields.
![Page 9: Muon (g-2)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062408/5681342a550346895d9b19a9/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June 2005 - p. 9/36
Muon (g-2): Store ± in a storage ring
magnetic field averaged over azumuth in the storage ring
![Page 10: Muon (g-2)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062408/5681342a550346895d9b19a9/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June 2005 - p. 10/36
Muon (g-2) Present precision: ± 0.5 ppm
![Page 11: Muon (g-2)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062408/5681342a550346895d9b19a9/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June 2005 - p. 11/36
Theory and Experiment
• Using these hadronic contributions
K. Hagiwara, et al., Phys. Rev. D69, 093003 (2004)
M. Davier et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 31, 503 (2003), A Höcker, hep-ph/0410081
![Page 12: Muon (g-2)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062408/5681342a550346895d9b19a9/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June 2005 - p. 12/36
a with standard model ~2.7
With this discrepancy, a compelling case can be made to do better, and resolve whether this “discrepancy” is significant or not.
![Page 13: Muon (g-2)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062408/5681342a550346895d9b19a9/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June 2005 - p. 13/36
Can we do a more precise measurement?
• Yes– E969 at BNL has scientific approval to reach 0.2ppm– At a more intense muon facility we could do better.
Will Theory Improve?
• Yes• First, let’s look at the pieces which might
contribute to a potential discrepancy.
![Page 14: Muon (g-2)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062408/5681342a550346895d9b19a9/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June 2005 - p. 14/36
Why might this be interesting?
• what sources of new physics are there?
![Page 15: Muon (g-2)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062408/5681342a550346895d9b19a9/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June 2005 - p. 15/36
aμ is sensitive to a wide range of new physics
• muon substructure
• anomalous couplings• SUSY (with large tanβ )
• many other things (extra dimensions, etc.)
![Page 16: Muon (g-2)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062408/5681342a550346895d9b19a9/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June 2005 - p. 16/36
SUSY connection between a , Dμ , μ → e
![Page 17: Muon (g-2)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062408/5681342a550346895d9b19a9/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June 2005 - p. 17/36
SUSY, dark matter, (g-2)
CMSSM
![Page 18: Muon (g-2)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062408/5681342a550346895d9b19a9/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June 2005 - p. 18/36
E969 = now
![Page 19: Muon (g-2)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062408/5681342a550346895d9b19a9/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June 2005 - p. 19/36
E969
![Page 20: Muon (g-2)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062408/5681342a550346895d9b19a9/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June 2005 - p. 20/36
SM value dominated by hadronic issues:
• Lowest order hadronic contribution ( ~ 60 ppm)
• Hadronic light-by-light contribution ( ~ 1 ppm)
The error on these two contributions will ultimately limit the interpretation of a more precise muon (g-2) measurement.
![Page 21: Muon (g-2)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062408/5681342a550346895d9b19a9/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June 2005 - p. 21/36
Lowest Order Hadronic contribution from e+e-
annihilation
![Page 22: Muon (g-2)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062408/5681342a550346895d9b19a9/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June 2005 - p. 22/36
Magnitude of the errors
• present hadronic uncertainty ~0.6 ppm• present experimental uncertainty 0.5 ppm
• theory: better R measurements– KLOE– BaBar– SND and CMD2 at Novosibirsk– More work on the strong interaction
• experiment: E969 @ BNL or elsewhere
How could we do better?
![Page 23: Muon (g-2)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062408/5681342a550346895d9b19a9/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June 2005 - p. 23/36
Recent News from Novosibirsk
• SND has just released their results for the cross section e+e- → + - over the . – Error on dispersion integral 50% higher
than CMD2– Good agreement with CMD2– Completely independent from CMD2
• Preprint should be on the web soon
![Page 24: Muon (g-2)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062408/5681342a550346895d9b19a9/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June 2005 - p. 24/36
How much could the theory improve?
• In their “Annual Reviews” articleDavier and Marciano guess a factor of 2 or so for argument let’s assume theory uncertainty will get to– 0.3 to 0.1 ppm
• Experiment– E969 at BNL (if it runs) could achieve a factor
of 2.5 for a total error of 0.2 ppm– future experiment could reach 0.06 ppm
How much could experiment improve?
![Page 25: Muon (g-2)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062408/5681342a550346895d9b19a9/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June 2005 - p. 25/36
E969 at BNL
• Scientific approval in September 2004– at present: no funds for construction or running
• Goal: total error = 0.2 ppm– lower systematic errors– more beam
![Page 26: Muon (g-2)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062408/5681342a550346895d9b19a9/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June 2005 - p. 26/36
Strategy of the improved experiment
• More muons – E821 was statistics limited stat = 0.46 ppm, syst = 0.3 ppm– Backward-decay, higher-transmission beamline– Double the quadrupoles in the decay line– New, open-end inflector – Upgrade detectors, electronics, DAQ
• Improve knowledge of magnetic field B– Improve calibration, field monitoring and
measurement• Reduce systematic errors on ωa
– Improve the electronics and detectors – New parallel “integration” method of analysis
![Page 27: Muon (g-2)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062408/5681342a550346895d9b19a9/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June 2005 - p. 27/36
Improved transmission into the ring
InflectorInflector aperture
Storage ring aperture
E821 Closed End P969 Proposed Open End
![Page 28: Muon (g-2)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062408/5681342a550346895d9b19a9/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June 2005 - p. 28/36Pedestal vs. Time
Near side Far side
E821: forward decay beam
Pions @ 3.115 GeV/c
Decay muons @ 3.094 GeV/c
This baseline limits how early we can fit data
![Page 29: Muon (g-2)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062408/5681342a550346895d9b19a9/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June 2005 - p. 29/36
E969: backward decay beam
Pions @ 5.32 GeV/c
Decay muons @ 3.094 GeV/c
No hadron-induced prompt flash
Approximately the same muon flux is realized
x 1 more
muons
Expect for both sides
![Page 30: Muon (g-2)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062408/5681342a550346895d9b19a9/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June 2005 - p. 30/36
E969: Systematic Error Goal
• Field improvements will involve better trolley calibrations, better tracking of the field with time, temperature stability of room, improvements in the hardware
• Precession improvements will involve new scraping scheme, lower thresholds, more complete digitization periods, better energy calibration
Systematic uncertainty (ppm)
1998 1999
2000 2001
E969
Goal
Magnetic field – p 0.5 0.4 0.24 0.17 0.1
Anomalous precession – a
0.8 0.3 0.3 0.21 0.1
![Page 31: Muon (g-2)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062408/5681342a550346895d9b19a9/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June 2005 - p. 31/36
Beyond E969?
• It’s not clear how far we can push the present technique.
• To get to 0.06 ppm presents many challenges.
• Perhaps a new storage ring design, and a smaller aperture. – detectors for another factor of 4 will be
very challenging.• At a neutrino factory we certainly we
can get more muons
![Page 32: Muon (g-2)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062408/5681342a550346895d9b19a9/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June 2005 - p. 32/36
A new idea (F.J.M. Farley)• Sector focused storage ring, which uses
polarized protons to measure ∫B. dℓ
No need to know / p
Need to know ∫B.dℓ to 20 ppb!!!!! (while E821 already achieved:
Can run well above the magic , so that there are more (g-2) cycles per lifetime.
Many details to be worked out.
![Page 33: Muon (g-2)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062408/5681342a550346895d9b19a9/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June 2005 - p. 33/36
As always, there are questions …
• Will E969 be funded and reach 0.2 ppm?
• How far can theory be improved?
• a observation from history . . . .
![Page 34: Muon (g-2)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062408/5681342a550346895d9b19a9/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June 2005 - p. 34/36
Where we came from:
![Page 35: Muon (g-2)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062408/5681342a550346895d9b19a9/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June 2005 - p. 35/36
Today with e+e- based theory:
All E821 results were obtained with a “blind” analysis.
world average
![Page 36: Muon (g-2)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062408/5681342a550346895d9b19a9/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June 2005 - p. 36/36
Summary
• (g-2) provides a precise check of the standard model, and accesses new physics in a way complementary to other probes.
• (g-2) is dependent on a standard model value, part of which must be taken from data (e+ e- → hadrons )
• The hadronic contribution will eventually set the limit on useful precision, but substantial improvement can be made beyond the present situation.
![Page 37: Muon (g-2)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062408/5681342a550346895d9b19a9/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June 2005 - p. 37/36
![Page 38: Muon (g-2)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062408/5681342a550346895d9b19a9/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June 2005 - p. 38/36
Fourier Transform: residuals to 5-parameter fit
beam motion across a
scintillating fiber – ~15 turn period
![Page 39: Muon (g-2)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062408/5681342a550346895d9b19a9/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June 2005 - p. 39/36
Effects of the CBO on e- spectrum
• CBO causes modulation of N, amplitude ~0.01
• CBO causes modulation of observed energy distribution
• which in turn causes oscillation in A(E), (E), with amplitudes ~0.001, ~1 mrad.
![Page 40: Muon (g-2)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062408/5681342a550346895d9b19a9/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June 2005 - p. 40/36
Functional form of the time spectrum
• A1 and A2 → artificial shifts in a up to 4 ppm in individual detectors when not accounted for.
![Page 41: Muon (g-2)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062408/5681342a550346895d9b19a9/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June 2005 - p. 41/36
Other Systematic Effects: a
• muon losses • gain changes and pedistal shifts• pulse pileup
![Page 42: Muon (g-2)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062408/5681342a550346895d9b19a9/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June 2005 - p. 42/36
E821: Systematic Errors
Systematic uncertainty (ppm)
1998
1999
2000
2001
Spin precession – a 0.8 0.3 0.3 0.21
Systematic uncertainty (ppm)
1998
1999
2000
2001
Magnetic field – p 0.5 0.4 0.24
0.17
Muon spin precession
Magnetic field