Download - microecnomic theory ch03
![Page 1: microecnomic theory ch03](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051400/552923924a795986158b461a/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
Chapter 3
PREFERENCES AND UTILITY
Copyright ©2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.
![Page 2: microecnomic theory ch03](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051400/552923924a795986158b461a/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Axioms of Rational Choice• Completeness
– if A and B are any two situations, an individual can always specify exactly one of these possibilities:
• A is preferred to B• B is preferred to A• A and B are equally attractive
![Page 3: microecnomic theory ch03](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051400/552923924a795986158b461a/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Axioms of Rational Choice• Transitivity
– if A is preferred to B, and B is preferred to C, then A is preferred to C
– assumes that the individual’s choices are internally consistent
![Page 4: microecnomic theory ch03](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051400/552923924a795986158b461a/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Axioms of Rational Choice• Continuity
– if A is preferred to B, then situations suitably “close to” A must also be preferred to B
– used to analyze individuals’ responses to relatively small changes in income and prices
![Page 5: microecnomic theory ch03](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051400/552923924a795986158b461a/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Utility• Given these assumptions, it is possible to
show that people are able to rank in order all possible situations from least desirable to most
• Economists call this ranking utility– if A is preferred to B, then the utility assigned
to A exceeds the utility assigned to B
U(A) > U(B)
![Page 6: microecnomic theory ch03](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051400/552923924a795986158b461a/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Utility• Utility rankings are ordinal in nature
– they record the relative desirability of commodity bundles
• Because utility measures are not unique, it makes no sense to consider how much more utility is gained from A than from B
• It is also impossible to compare utilities between people
![Page 7: microecnomic theory ch03](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051400/552923924a795986158b461a/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Utility• Utility is affected by the consumption of
physical commodities, psychological attitudes, peer group pressures, personal experiences, and the general cultural environment
• Economists generally devote attention to quantifiable options while holding constant the other things that affect utility– ceteris paribus assumption
![Page 8: microecnomic theory ch03](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051400/552923924a795986158b461a/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Utility• Assume that an individual must choose
among consumption goods x1, x2,…, xn
• The individual’s rankings can be shown by a utility function of the form:
utility = U(x1, x2,…, xn; other things)
– this function is unique up to an order-preserving transformation
![Page 9: microecnomic theory ch03](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051400/552923924a795986158b461a/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Economic Goods• In the utility function, the x’s are assumed
to be “goods”– more is preferred to less
Quantity of x
Quantity of y
x*
y*
Preferred to x*, y*
?
?Worsethanx*, y*
![Page 10: microecnomic theory ch03](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051400/552923924a795986158b461a/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Indifference Curves• An indifference curve shows a set of
consumption bundles among which the individual is indifferent
Quantity of x
Quantity of y
x1
y1
y2
x2
U1
Combinations (x1, y1) and (x2, y2)provide the same level of utility
![Page 11: microecnomic theory ch03](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051400/552923924a795986158b461a/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Marginal Rate of Substitution• The negative of the slope of the
indifference curve at any point is called the marginal rate of substitution (MRS)
Quantity of x
Quantity of y
x1
y1
y2
x2
U1
1
UUdx
dyMRS
![Page 12: microecnomic theory ch03](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051400/552923924a795986158b461a/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Marginal Rate of Substitution• MRS changes as x and y change
– reflects the individual’s willingness to trade y for x
Quantity of x
Quantity of y
x1
y1
y2
x2
U1
At (x1, y1), the indifference curve is steeper.The person would be willing to give up morey to gain additional units of x
At (x2, y2), the indifference curveis flatter. The person would bewilling to give up less y to gainadditional units of x
![Page 13: microecnomic theory ch03](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051400/552923924a795986158b461a/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Indifference Curve Map• Each point must have an indifference curve through it
Quantity of x
Quantity of y
U1 < U2 < U3
U1
U2
U3
Increasing utility
![Page 14: microecnomic theory ch03](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051400/552923924a795986158b461a/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Transitivity• Can any two of an individual’s indifference curves intersect?
Quantity of x
Quantity of y
U1
U2
A
BC
The individual is indifferent between A and C.The individual is indifferent between B and C.Transitivity suggests that the individualshould be indifferent between A and B
But B is preferred to Abecause B contains morex and y than A
![Page 15: microecnomic theory ch03](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051400/552923924a795986158b461a/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Convexity• A set of points is convex if any two points can be joined by a
straight line that is contained completely within the set
Quantity of x
Quantity of y
U1
The assumption of a diminishing MRS isequivalent to the assumption that allcombinations of x and y which are preferred to x* and y* form a convex set
x*
y*
![Page 16: microecnomic theory ch03](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051400/552923924a795986158b461a/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Convexity• If the indifference curve is convex, then the combination (x1 + x2)/2, (y1 + y2)/2
will be preferred to either (x1,y1) or (x2,y2)
Quantity of x
Quantity of y
U1
x2
y1
y2
x1
This implies that “well-balanced” bundles are preferredto bundles that are heavily weighted toward onecommodity
(x1 + x2)/2
(y1 + y2)/2
![Page 17: microecnomic theory ch03](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051400/552923924a795986158b461a/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Utility and the MRS• Suppose an individual’s preferences for
hamburgers (y) and soft drinks (x) can be represented by
yx 10 utility
• Solving for y, we gety = 100/x
• Solving for MRS = -dy/dx:MRS = -dy/dx = 100/x2
![Page 18: microecnomic theory ch03](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051400/552923924a795986158b461a/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
Utility and the MRSMRS = -dy/dx = 100/x2
• Note that as x rises, MRS falls– when x = 5, MRS = 4– when x = 20, MRS = 0.25
![Page 19: microecnomic theory ch03](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051400/552923924a795986158b461a/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
Marginal Utility• Suppose that an individual has a utility
function of the form
utility = U(x,y)
• The total differential of U is
dyy
Udx
x
UdU
• Along any indifference curve, utility is constant (dU = 0)
![Page 20: microecnomic theory ch03](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051400/552923924a795986158b461a/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Deriving the MRS• Therefore, we get:
yUxU
dx
dyMRS
constantU
• MRS is the ratio of the marginal utility of x to the marginal utility of y
![Page 21: microecnomic theory ch03](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051400/552923924a795986158b461a/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
Diminishing Marginal Utility and the MRS
• Intuitively, it seems that the assumption of decreasing marginal utility is related to the concept of a diminishing MRS– diminishing MRS requires that the utility
function be quasi-concave• this is independent of how utility is measured
– diminishing marginal utility depends on how utility is measured
• Thus, these two concepts are different
![Page 22: microecnomic theory ch03](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051400/552923924a795986158b461a/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
Convexity of Indifference Curves
• Suppose that the utility function is
yx utility
• We can simplify the algebra by taking the logarithm of this function
U*(x,y) = ln[U(x,y)] = 0.5 ln x + 0.5 ln y
![Page 23: microecnomic theory ch03](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051400/552923924a795986158b461a/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
Convexity of Indifference Curves
x
y
y
x
yUx
U
MRS
5.0
5.0
*
*
• Thus,
![Page 24: microecnomic theory ch03](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051400/552923924a795986158b461a/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
Convexity of Indifference Curves
• If the utility function is
U(x,y) = x + xy + y
• There is no advantage to transforming this utility function, so
x
y
yUxU
MRS
1
1
![Page 25: microecnomic theory ch03](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051400/552923924a795986158b461a/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
Convexity of Indifference Curves
• Suppose that the utility function is22 utility yx
• For this example, it is easier to use the transformation
U*(x,y) = [U(x,y)]2 = x2 + y2
![Page 26: microecnomic theory ch03](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051400/552923924a795986158b461a/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
Convexity of Indifference Curves
y
x
y
x
yUx
U
MRS
2
2*
*
• Thus,
![Page 27: microecnomic theory ch03](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051400/552923924a795986158b461a/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
Examples of Utility Functions
• Cobb-Douglas Utility
utility = U(x,y) = xy
where and are positive constants
– The relative sizes of and indicate the
relative importance of the goods
![Page 28: microecnomic theory ch03](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051400/552923924a795986158b461a/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
Examples of Utility Functions
• Perfect Substitutes
utility = U(x,y) = x + y
Quantity of x
Quantity of y
U1
U2
U3
The indifference curves will be linear.The MRS will be constant along the indifference curve.
![Page 29: microecnomic theory ch03](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051400/552923924a795986158b461a/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29
Examples of Utility Functions
• Perfect Complements
utility = U(x,y) = min (x, y)
Quantity of x
Quantity of yThe indifference curves will be L-shaped. Only by choosing more of the two goods together can utility be increased.
U1
U2
U3
![Page 30: microecnomic theory ch03](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051400/552923924a795986158b461a/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30
Examples of Utility Functions• CES Utility (Constant elasticity of
substitution)utility = U(x,y) = x/ + y/
when 0 andutility = U(x,y) = ln x + ln y
when = 0– Perfect substitutes = 1– Cobb-Douglas = 0– Perfect complements = -
![Page 31: microecnomic theory ch03](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051400/552923924a795986158b461a/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31
Examples of Utility Functions• CES Utility (Constant elasticity of
substitution)– The elasticity of substitution () is equal to
1/(1 - )
• Perfect substitutes = • Fixed proportions = 0
![Page 32: microecnomic theory ch03](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051400/552923924a795986158b461a/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
32
Homothetic Preferences• If the MRS depends only on the ratio of
the amounts of the two goods, not on the quantities of the goods, the utility function is homothetic– Perfect substitutes MRS is the same at
every point– Perfect complements MRS = if y/x >
/, undefined if y/x = /, and MRS = 0 if y/x < /
![Page 33: microecnomic theory ch03](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051400/552923924a795986158b461a/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
33
Homothetic Preferences
• For the general Cobb-Douglas function, the MRS can be found as
x
y
yx
yx
yUxU
MRS
1
1
![Page 34: microecnomic theory ch03](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051400/552923924a795986158b461a/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
34
Nonhomothetic Preferences• Some utility functions do not exhibit
homothetic preferences
utility = U(x,y) = x + ln y
y
yyUxU
MRS
11
![Page 35: microecnomic theory ch03](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051400/552923924a795986158b461a/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
35
The Many-Good Case• Suppose utility is a function of n goods
given by
utility = U(x1, x2,…, xn)
• The total differential of U is
nn
dxx
Udx
x
Udx
x
UdU
...22
11
![Page 36: microecnomic theory ch03](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051400/552923924a795986158b461a/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
36
The Many-Good Case• We can find the MRS between any two
goods by setting dU = 0
j
i
i
jji
xUxU
dx
dxxxMRS
) for (
jj
ii
dxx
Udx
x
UdU
0
• Rearranging, we get
![Page 37: microecnomic theory ch03](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051400/552923924a795986158b461a/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
37
Multigood Indifference Surfaces
• We will define an indifference surface as being the set of points in n dimensions that satisfy the equation
U(x1,x2,…xn) = k
where k is any preassigned constant
![Page 38: microecnomic theory ch03](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051400/552923924a795986158b461a/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
38
Multigood Indifference Surfaces
• If the utility function is quasi-concave, the set of points for which U k will be convex– all of the points on a line joining any two
points on the U = k indifference surface will also have U k
![Page 39: microecnomic theory ch03](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051400/552923924a795986158b461a/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
39
Important Points to Note:• If individuals obey certain behavioral
postulates, they will be able to rank all commodity bundles– the ranking can be represented by a utility
function– in making choices, individuals will act as if
they were maximizing this function
• Utility functions for two goods can be illustrated by an indifference curve map
![Page 40: microecnomic theory ch03](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051400/552923924a795986158b461a/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
40
Important Points to Note:• The negative of the slope of the
indifference curve measures the marginal rate of substitution (MRS)– the rate at which an individual would trade
an amount of one good (y) for one more unit of another good (x)
• MRS decreases as x is substituted for y– individuals prefer some balance in their
consumption choices
![Page 41: microecnomic theory ch03](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051400/552923924a795986158b461a/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
41
Important Points to Note:
• A few simple functional forms can capture important differences in individuals’ preferences for two (or more) goods– Cobb-Douglas function– linear function (perfect substitutes)– fixed proportions function (perfect
complements)– CES function
• includes the other three as special cases
![Page 42: microecnomic theory ch03](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022051400/552923924a795986158b461a/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
42
Important Points to Note:
• It is a simple matter to generalize from two-good examples to many goods– studying peoples’ choices among many
goods can yield many insights– the mathematics of many goods is not
especially intuitive, so we will rely on two-good cases to build intuition