Mentored Research & Professional Development
Eugene P. Orringer, MDApril 14, 2003
New Career Opportunities for Clinician/Scientists
Problems for Clinician-Scientists
“The clinical investigator as an
endangered species”
James Wyngaarden - NEJM, 1979
Problems for Clinician-Scientists
Crisis in Clinical ResearchCrisis in Clinical Research
Ahrens: Oxford Press, 1992
Problems for Clinician-Scientists
“Investigator-initiated applications for patient oriented research (POR) are not reviewed equitably at the NIH………”
Williams et al. - JAMA, 1997.
Problems for Clinician-Scientists
“The four P’s that are relevant to patient-oriented research include: ”
• Patience• Patients• Passion• Poverty
Brown & Goldstein – JCI 1997.
Problems for Clinician-Scientists
“The number of first-time MD applicants for NIH research support has plummeted over the past few years……”
Rosenberg - Science, 1999
Problems for Clinician-Scientists
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006
Year
Nu
mb
er
of
Firs
t T
ime
A
pp
lica
nts
to
NIH
Rosenberg - Science, 1999.
MDs
MD-PhDs
Problems for Clinician-ScientistsReport from the Clinical Research Roundtable
Four key challenges facing the US clinical research enterprise
• Workforce training • Public participation• Information systems• Funding
Sung et al. - JAMA, 2003
Problems for Clinician-Scientists
Translating Biomedical Research to the Bedside: A National Crisis & a Call to Action
Rosenberg – JAMA, 2003
The Promise of Basic Research
• The Human Genome Project
• Stem cell research
• The procurement of suitable organs &/or the development of artificial organs
• Novel, target-based drugs
• New vaccines
Delivering on the Promise
Clinical Research could .…
a) Be a powerful vehicle to deliver to the public the promises of basic science
or alternatively it could ….
b) Emerge as the rate limiting step in the translation of basic science to benefit the greater public health
Problems for Clinician-Scientists
Is there truth to these various predictions of Gloom & Doom?
• Can something be learned from the career of a slightly graying clinican-scientist?
• What has been/is being done to facilitate the efforts of today’s young people?
• How have we at UNC sought to take advantage of these new opportunities?
Eugene P. Orringer
My career – provides evidence that:
• The right mentors &/or role models are critically important to ones future success
• It certainly pays to be at the right place at the right time
Eugene P. OrringerMentors & Role Models
• Medical School - Jack Myers
• Fellowship - John C. Parker
• Junior Faculty - Wendell Rosse
• GCRC Director - Michael Thorner
• MD-PhD Program - Sal Pizzo
• Dean’s Office - Jeff Houpt
John C. Parker, MD: 1935-1993
Eugene P. OrringerFellowship TrainingFellowship Training
• Clinical Hematology
• Red Cell Physiology
Membrane Transport
Volume Regulation
Metabolism
Eugene P. Orringer Initial NIH FundingInitial NIH Funding
Co-I on Dr. John C. Parker’s R01
Eugene P. Orringer Subsequent NIH Funding
• PI: RCDA from NHLBI
• PI: R01 from NHLBI
Eugene P. Orringer Evolution as a Clinical Investigator
• Realized that I was not a basic scientist
• Looked for an opportunity to apply my understanding of RBC membrane transport to an important medical problem
• Identified sickle cell disease as an ideal model of disordered RBC physiology
• Recognized the institutional need for a clinical program that focused on patients with this genetic disorder
The UNC Sickle Cell Program
Identified those sickle cell patients who were receiving their care at UNC
Created an institutional program committed to the comprehensive care of children & adults with sickle cell disease
Started a clinical research program, one that initially relied on industry-supported clinical trials
Used these studies to generate interest among the patients & to recruit and fund the staff needed to begin to build a program
Wendell F. Rosse, MD
The UNC Sickle Cell Program
• Began a long-standing collaboration with Wendell F. Rosse
• The support & encouragement of Dr. Rosse were instrumental in my long-term success as a clinical investigator
The UNC Sickle Cell Program
• Developed a variety of joint efforts with Duke
• Duke & UNC helped to form and became key components of the North Carolina Sickle Cell Consortium
• Built a Duke-UNC database which contains over 1000 sickle cell patients
The UNC Sickle Cell Program
1988 - Prepared our 1st joint Duke-UNC application & received NIH funding for the Duke-UNC Comprehensive Sickle Cell Center
General Clinical Research Center
• 1980’s: As a clinical investigator, I often used our NIH-funded GCRC
• 1988: Invited to serve on the GCRC Study Section
• 1989: Selected to serve as UNC’s GCRC Program Director
General Clinical Research Center
• As Program Director (1989-1999), I took a very institutional approach to the GCRC
• Particular emphasis on junior faculty development Training programs focused on both clinical
research & research ethics Institutional clinical research fellowship CAP & M-CAP Programs NIEHS Contract
UNC MD-PhD Program
• In 1995, I agreed to assume the leadership of UNC’s MD-PhD Program
• At that time, this was a modest program recruiting 1-2 students per year without benefit of an MSTP grant
• Based on the substantial support we received from UNC and on two excellent recruiting classes, we wrote a successful MSTP application in mid-1997
• In early 1999, we were able to recruit our initial class of students as an NIH-funded MSTP Program
UNC MD-PhD Program1995 to the Present
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1995 1996 1997 1999 2000 2001 2002
Students
Year
UNC MD-PhD Program
The current year (2003) was an important one for UNC’s MD-PhD Program
• Wrote a renewal application for MSTP award
• Eight of our current students will defend their PhDs
• Four of our current students will graduate
1 going to Stanford in Internal Medicine 1 going to Baylor in Medical Genetics 2 going to Yale in Dermatology
Institutional Philosophy - I
The best medical centers benefit from individuals with varying skills
Superb investigators
Excellent leaders
Effective administrators
Executive Associate Dean
• In 1999, I agreed to give up the GCRC Directorship & assume the role of Executive Associate Dean
• My acceptance of this role was based, in part, on the opportunity to lead the recruitment of numerous chairs and center directors for our clinical and basic science departments
School of Medicine UNC-Chapel Hill
Over the past four years, we have recruited to UNC a cadre of new leaders who have together brought to the School of Medicine a vibrancy and a sense of excitement that is truly palpable
UNC School of Medicine New Chairs & Center Directors
CLINICAL LEADERS
• Runge - Medicine
• Stiles - Pediatrics
• Meyer - Surgery
• Diaz - Dermatology
• Pillsbury - ENT
• Longo - Neurology
• Meredith - Ophthalmology
• Newton - Family Medicine
• Watkins - GCRC
BASIC SCIENCE LEADERS
• Magnuson - Genetics
• Snider - Neuroscience
• Bankaitis - Cell Biology
• Anderson - Physiology
• Johnson - Pharmacology
• Patel - Arthritis Center
Institutional Philosophy - II
At the end of the day, it is really the young people that are absolutely critical to the growth and the ultimate success of a School of Medicine
Executive Associate Dean
• In 1999, I agreed to give up the GCRC Directorship & assume the role of Executive Associate Dean
• Based on my experiences with the GCRC and the MD-PhD Program, I realized how much I enjoyed helping young people succeed
• I felt that this was a particularly good time for young people whose focus was clinical research
NIH Directors Panel(The Nathan Committee)
Key Recommendations
• Creation of several new awards in the “K series” (see K Kiosk Website)
• Re-evaluation of the NIH Review Process
Clinical Research Enhancement ActPublic Law #106-505Public Law #106-505
• Statutory language for the GCRC Program
• Infastructure support for clinical research
• Loan forgiveness for clinical investigators
(http://lrp.info.nih.gov/extramural/FAQ_CRE.htm)http://lrp.info.nih.gov/extramural/FAQ_CRE.htm)
Eugene P. Orringer Executive Associate Dean
In negotiating for this position, I presented the Dean with the concept of developing a new office, the purpose of which would be to enhance the grant portfolio of the School of Medicine
“Office of Research & Faculty Development”
UNC-CH School of Medicine Office of Research & Faculty Development
Using central resources, the School has created an Office of Research & Faculty Development, the primary purpose of which is to assist our faculty and to enhance the grant portfolio in the School of Medicine
Office of Research & Faculty Development
Since its inception, the focus of this office has been two-fold:
• Assist with proposals that are multidisciplinary, multi-school, and/or multi-institutional
• Assist with junior faculty grant proposals
Office of Research & Faculty Development
A few examples of the multidisciplinary and/or multi-institutional proposals include:
• Mutant Mouse Regional Resource Center
• Two NCRR Renovation Grants
• K30 & Two K12 Awards (BIRCWH & MCRSP)
• Neonatal Research Network
• Doris Duke Clinical Research Grant
• Numerous Training Grants
• Joint Duke-UNC Grant Proposals
• Minority Center of Excellence Application
NIH Support UNC School of Medicine
0
50
100
150
200
1970 1980 1990 2000
Year
Do
lla
rs (
Millio
ns
)
Office of Research
Office of Research & Faculty Development
Evidence of its success came in the spring of 2002 when a re-engineering task force was asked by Dean Houpt to review all centrally-funded programs & to recommend specific areas for budget cuts.
The Task Force suggested that the budget of this office should NOT be cut: in fact, they suggested that it be increased!!!
Office of Research & Faculty Development
Work with junior faculty to facilitate the submission of:
K applications (K01, K08, K23)
Career applications to professional societies, foundations, and
other non- governmental organizations (NGOs)
Office of Research & Faculty Development
Over the past 3+ Years, we have also created a “grant library” that has helped to coordinate & facilitate the submission of numerous research grant applications, particularly those of young people
IndependentInvestigatorInternship/Residency SpecialtyMedical
School
Mentored Patient-Oriented Mentored Patient-Oriented Research CDA (K23Research CDA (K23)
K23 - Patient-Oriented Research CDA
NIH Goal for K23: To fund at least 100 new awards/year
Total # of K23 Awards made by the NIH
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
YEARS
NIH Support to UNC# of K23 Awards
K23 Awards to junior faculty members at UNC
Year (#) (%)
1998 0 n/a 1999 2 1.4 2000 8 2.4 2001 15 3.0 2002 22 3.3
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
Total NIH Support to theExtramural Community
NIH Support to UNC
NIH $’s NIH $’s NIH (Millions) (%) Ranking
1999 131 1.02 172000 144 0.98 152001 170 1.08 15
NIH - Total Extramural Awards
05
101520
1999 2000 2001
Year
$ (B
illio
ns)
UNC School of MedicineTotal NIH $’s vs K23 Awards
NIH Grants K23 Awards * (%) (%)
1999 1.02 1.42000 0.98 2.42001 1.08 3.02002 n/a 3.3
* Junior faculty at UNC also still hold 3 CAP awards, there are 6 people on the K12 (BIRCWH) award, & 3 people on the K12 (Clinical Research), and 6 additional pending K23 applications at the NIH
Office of Research & Faculty Development
Assumed a leadership role in a variety of institutional education & training programs:
• Medical Student Research Programs
• K30 Program
• K12: BIRCWH Program
• RWJ Clinical Scholars Program
• K12: Mentored Clinical Research Program
UNC-Chapel HillMedical Student Research Programs
• The School of Medicine at UNC-Chapel Hill enrolls 160 students per year
• Each year, over 50% of these students take part in some form of biomedical research
UNC-Chapel HillMedical Student Research
• Short Term (3 month) Experiences Holderness Foundation ~ 10 Short Term Training Program (NIH) ~ 35
• Year-Long Experiences Doris Duke Clinical Research Program 5 Distinguished Medical Scholars Program 6 NIDDK Minority Fellowship Program (NIH) 3
• Combined Degree Programs MD-PhD (NIH MSTP award) 8 MD-MPH ~ 23
TOTAL # of Students / Year ~ 90
Office of Research & Faculty Development
Contributions to Medical Student Research• NIGMS Short Term Medical Student Training Program
• Doris Duke Clinical Research Scholar Program
• NIDDK Minority Medical Student Research Program
• Individual (F30 & F31) awards to MD-PhD students
• NHLBI Minority Medical Student Short Term Training Program
Doris Duke Medical Student Clinical Research Program
• Five students per year
• Full year of patient-oriented research (POR)
• Solicit applications from student-mentor pairs
• Require a GCRC-based project
• Recruit both UNC & external candidates
• Emphasis on minority candidates
Office of Research & Faculty Development
Contributions to Medical Student Research• NIGMS Short Term Medical Student Training Program
• Doris Duke Clinical Research Scholar Program
• NIDDK Minority Medical Student Research Program
• Individual (F30 & F31) awards to MD-PhD students
• NHLBI Minority Medical Student Short Term Training Program
UNC-Chapel HillUNC-Chapel Hill
Career Development Career Development
for Clinician-Scientistsfor Clinician-Scientists
School of Medicine UNC-Chapel Hill
The School of Medicine at UNC has a passionate commitment to the development of its junior faculty, particularly those with a career focus on translational and patient-oriented research
UNC Seeks to Foster the Development of Clinician-Scientists
Programs for Career Development
• K30 Program
• K12 Awards
• Minority Cohort Program
K30 - Clinical Research Curriculum
• K30 Award
• UNC received funding as 1 of the initial cohort of 35
• This grant provides funds for infrastructure
• No funds for the trainees
K30 - Clinical Research Curriculum
• Most K30 Programs placed emphasis on a new degree-granting program (e.g., MS or an MPH in Clinical Research or the equivalent)
• Typical ‘product’ of our K30 Program is not a degree, but rather a grant (e.g., K23 or the equivalent)
K30 - Clinical Research Curriculum
Broad-Based ProgramSchools of Medicine, Pharmacy, & Public Health
Two-year durationYr 01 = didactics, design the research project,
develop a grant proposal
Yr 02 = Conduct of the research project Submit a grant proposal
K30 - Clinical Research CurriculumStructureStructure
• Coursework
• Seminar Series
• Research Project
• Work-in-Progress Presentations
• Grant Preparation
• Mock Study Section Reviews
• Mentoring Panels
K30 - Clinical Research Curriculum Status of the Trainees
Funding status of the K30 Trainees (n = 13) * who have enrolled between July 2000 & the present
Funded Pending
K23 AwardsK23 Awards 6 6 3 3 * * Note that 2 of these individuals are Professors on sabbatical. The Note that 2 of these individuals are Professors on sabbatical. The
others, fellows in their initial year of the K30 Program, are not yet others, fellows in their initial year of the K30 Program, are not yet ready to write a K23.ready to write a K23.
UNC Seeks to Foster the Development of Clinician-Scientists
Programs for Career Development
• K30 Program
• K12 Awards
• Minority Cohort Program
K12 Award
• A K12 grant is an institutional award designed to provide protected time to a group of scientists committed to academic research careers.
• A K12 Award is very much like a training grant, but one that is designed for junior faculty rather than for post-doctoral fellows
The BIRCWH Program K12 Award
Building
Interdisciplinary
Research
Careers in
Women’s
Health
UNC BIRCWH Program
The BIRCWH Award brought to UNC 5 years of support @ $500,000/year
Almost all $’s are available to support the salary of junior faculty, thereby providing them with 75% protected time for research
Our goal in the BIRCWH is to assist each Scholar obtain an NIH award (e.g., K23, K08, R01) & thus achieve research independence within 2 years
UNC BIRCWH Program
Developed the concept that if funded, the UNC BIRCWH Program would have both:
• BIRCWH Scholars
• BIRCWH Associates
BIRCWH Scholar
An individual who is receiving salary support from the BIRCWH grant
BIRCWH AssociateAn individual who had previously received salary support from the BIRCWH grant but subsequently went on to compete successfully for his/ her own, independent grant support
- or -
An individual who would have been competitive for BIRCWH funding, but simply had too much independent funding
UNC BIRCWH Program
By developing this concept of both Scholars and Associates, the UNC BIRCWH Program has now grown substantially. Upon entering year - 03, we have a
critical masscritical mass of approximately 15 young people with interests and backgrounds that are remarkably diverse.
K12 Awards
A very inexpensive way to fund the next generation of academic research
ExampleExample
Using the BIRCWH model, $5 Million supports 10 Using the BIRCWH model, $5 Million supports 10 programs & 50 Trainees/yearprograms & 50 Trainees/year
K12 AwardsA K12 can have a big multiplier effect
ExampleExampleWe have found that if they are used We have found that if they are used effectively, each K12 slot can be turned effectively, each K12 slot can be turned over 2-3 times in a 5 year cycleover 2-3 times in a 5 year cycle
K12 – BIRCWH ProgramStatus of the Trainees
Status of the BIRCWH Scholars & Associates (n = 15) who have been a part of our Program between October 2000 & the present
Funded Pending
K23 Awards 3 - K08 Awards 3 -
K01 Awards 1 -R01 Awards 2 2R03 Awards 3 -Doris Duke Award 1 -Pfizer Award 1 -Others 8 4
K12 - Mentored Clinical Research Scholars Program (MCRSP)
• A new K12 Program developed by NCRR
• Designed to provide salary support for young people (including many K30 trainees)
• The salary support will bring with it the protected time that is so important for the conduct of patient-oriented research
• NCRR received ~ 45 applications & funded 11
K12 - Mentored Clinical Research Scholars Program (MCRSP)
Structure of UNC’s K12 Application
• Close Linkage to the GCRC, to the K30 Program, & to the Dean’s Office
• Gene Orringer - Principal Investigator
• Paul Watkins - Program Director
K12 - Mentored Clinical Research Scholars Program (MCRSP)
• Extremely pleased with the quality of the initial candiates
• Initially selected three from a total of 15 applicants
• As with the BIRCWH: Each Scholar was promised 2 years of support Require a minimum of 75% protected time
• Too early to say how successful this program will be
Minority Cohort Program (MCP) Scholars
• UNC is fully committed to having a faculty with as much ethnic and gender diversity as possible
• The MCP was established in 1994 by then Dean Michael Simmons
• Each faculty member selected as an MCP awardee receives up to 6 years of support
MCP Scholars
• An Advisory Committee (3 department chairs) selects the awardees and provides guidance re. faculty development
• Each Scholar is expected to: Be a visible and available role model Exhibit progress along an academic path
• Each Department Chair with a Scholar submits an annual report that reviews the Scholar’s progress and summarizes his/her career development
.
MCP Scholars
• Total # of awardees in the program = 10
• # of awardees currently receiving support = 6
• 8 women and 2 men
• 8 African-Americans and 2 Hispanics
• Departments receiving support: Family Medicine (1); Medicine (2); Nutrition (1); Pediatrics (4); Pharmacology (1);Social Medicine (1)
• 16% of School’s URM faculty
• 38% of School’s URM at the Assistant Professor Level
.
MCP Scholars
• MCP has played a major role in increasing the diversity of our junior faculty
• The MCP has had a major impact on the institution by helping to: Build new programs that further increase the
diversity of the School
Provide protected time and thereby enhance the academic development and retention of our junior faculty
MCP ScholarsFunding Status of the Scholars
Independent funding status of the Scholars (n = 10) who have received support from the MCP between 1994 & the present
Award Type Funded
RO1 Awards 3 K23 Awards 1
K01 Awards 1 P60 Project 1 NIH Minority Supplement 2 RWJ Minority Faculty Development Award 3 Other CDA 2 Co-I Research Grant 4 PI: NIH T32 Award 1
Center of Excellence - HRSA • Awarded to UNC in the Fall of 2002
• Among the criteria responsible for UNC’s success in competing for this COE Grant: Rank 9th nationally in number of African-American physicians
graduated
Rank 5th nationally in number of Native American physicians graduated
More than 15% of students are URM
More than 4% of faculty members are URM
• The COE provides funds for two additional URM faculty members each year
• At UNC, we have developed a model that we believe has assisted our faculty and expanded the grant portfolio throughout the School of Medicine
• We are convinced that this is actually a very good time for young people with a career-commitment to clinical & patient-oriented research
• Perhaps the most tangible benefit of this program has been a major increase the number of young people with extramural funding & protected time
New Career Opportunities for Clinician/Scientists