Transcript
Page 1: Learning Event No. 1, Session 1: Strassburg, ARDD2012 Rio

Bernardo Baeta Neves Strassburg

[email protected]

Instituto Internacional para Sustentabilidade

Rio de Janeiro, Brasil

Mato Grosso: realising the land-sparing potential from increased agricultural productivity

Page 2: Learning Event No. 1, Session 1: Strassburg, ARDD2012 Rio

Mato Grosso Context

•Highest deforestation rates of the Amazon and Cerrado •40% of state natural cover converted •Strong projected increase of soybean for the next decade (up to 3.5 mi ha)

Biome Deforested Area Remaining

Area Total Area

Km2 % Km2 % Km2 %

Amazon 204 39 322 61 526 58

Cerrado 157 42 220 58 377 42

Total 361 40 542 60 903 100 6,0

6,5

7,0

7,5

8,0

8,5

9,0

20102011201220132014201520162017201820192020

Soyb

ean

Are

a (m

i ha)

Page 3: Learning Event No. 1, Session 1: Strassburg, ARDD2012 Rio

Increasing Cattle Ranching Productivity as main option to conciliate conservation and agricultural expansion

•First estimate of the potential to increase productivity of Brazilian pasturelands; •Current Productivity = 32% carrying capacity •Increasing it to 49-51% would suffice to meet all projected land demands up to 2040;

Current Productivity Potential Productivity Alocation in 2040

Improved Use of Existing Lands: Meeting Demands and Sparing Nature in Brazil Strassburg, BBN; Latawiec, AE; Barioni, LG; Assad, E; Valentin, J; Porfirio dos Santos, V; Nobre, C.

under review, Nature Climate Change

Page 4: Learning Event No. 1, Session 1: Strassburg, ARDD2012 Rio

… will land sparing follow cattle ranching intensification ?

But…

Page 5: Learning Event No. 1, Session 1: Strassburg, ARDD2012 Rio

Land Sparing vs. Rebound Effect

Price

Quantity

S1

S2 •Increased Productivity •More production per area •Higher returns per unit produced

•The relative weight of these effects will determine the final impact of increased productivity

1990 2000

Productivity (t/ha) 2.01 3.02

Production (mi t) 3.0 8.7

Area (mi ha) 1.5 2.9

Soybean in Mato Grosso:

Rebound Effect

Demand*

Q1 Q2

* For producers in region under intervention

Page 6: Learning Event No. 1, Session 1: Strassburg, ARDD2012 Rio

… how to realise the potential for land sparing from increased productivity?

So…

Page 7: Learning Event No. 1, Session 1: Strassburg, ARDD2012 Rio

Associate incentives to increase productivity with conservation measures C

hal

len

ge

Co

mp

on

en

ts

Stra

tegi

es

Conciliate conservation and agriculture expansion

Conservation of remaining forests

Restoration of Degraded Forests

Improved Use of Agricultural lands

Control illegal deforestation

Apply market pressure against deforestation

(soy moratorium, sectoral agreements)

Create incentives for the conservation and

sustainable management of the forest

Monitor and strengthen the

compliance with forest code

Provide technical assiatance, credit and

incentives

Increase productivity (Good practices)

Increase area under multiple uses: Crop-

Livestock, Agroforestry, Silvipastoral systems

Implement spatial planning to prioritise

areas

Page 8: Learning Event No. 1, Session 1: Strassburg, ARDD2012 Rio

Associate incentives to increase productivity with land sparing

“Land Neutral Agricultural Expansion”(LNAE*) mechanism •Incentives for cattle ranching intensification associated with the mitigation or compensation of agricultural expansion (soybean);

“Land Neutral Ecological Restoration”(LNER*) mechanism •Incentives for cattle ranching intensification associated with ecological restoration;

* Strassburg, B. (2012) – IIS Working Paper

Page 9: Learning Event No. 1, Session 1: Strassburg, ARDD2012 Rio

1000 Heads in Crop-Livestock System

1000 Heads of Cattle

1000 Heads

Soy

1000 Heads

1000 Heads

1000 Heads

1500 Heads

1500 Heads

Soy

1000 Heads of Cattle

Bef

ore

A

fter

Multiple Uses

In-Farm Mitigation Consortium Compensation

Single Use+Intensification

The “Land Neutral Agricultural Expansion” Mechanism

Page 10: Learning Event No. 1, Session 1: Strassburg, ARDD2012 Rio

Take home messages

•Land sparing does not necessarily follow increased productivity; •Quite often the opposite occurs, due to the “rebound effect” •But increased productivity carries the potential for land sparing, under some circumstances

•Associated with increased costs of forest conversion •It is also possible to condition the incentives for increased productivity to activities that ensure land sparing;

Page 11: Learning Event No. 1, Session 1: Strassburg, ARDD2012 Rio

Bernardo Baeta Neves Strassburg

[email protected]

Instituto Internacional para Sustentabilidade

Rio de Janeiro, Brasil

Thank You


Top Related