Law & EthicsIn Scholastic Journalism
Media Law & Ethics
What are the five freedoms guaranteed by First Amendment?
How does the First Amendment relate to high school journalism?
What are the ethical standards in professional journalism?
What are the landmark legal cases for high school journalism?
“… were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter.”
-- Thomas Jefferson, 1787
Think:Does freedom of the press exist today?
Yes. Mostly…
But restrictions on the press do exist.Journalists can be brought to court, tried
and fined if convicted.
So who sues journalists?
People who feel damaged in print or broadcast.
Why?
Journalists most often are sued for violating laws applying to
LibelInvasion of privacyObscenity standards
LAWSare what we HAVE TO do.
ETHICSare what we SHOULD do.
POLICYis what the publication decides it will ethically do.
The First Amendmentof the United States Constitution
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. — The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
Defamation
Anything spoken, written or pictured that could damage a person’s reputation.
LibelLibel: a false statement that injures
someone’s reputation. Libel is published defamation. That includes electronic and print media.
Slander: Traditionally slander is spoken libel. Nowadays, with all the new ways to “speak” or “publish,” slander and libel have essentially come to mean same thing.
Libel
But what if the damaging statement is TRUE?
Libel
Then it’s not libelous.
Libel, BTW
You can’t go to jail for libel. Libel is a civil offense (not a criminal one). If you are found guilty, you will be required to pay a damages.
Well… and you may lose your job. Libel damages have gone as high as $20 million in recent history!
Potentially libelous…
Accusing someone of criminal behaviorAttacking someone’s ethicsAccusing someone of being a spy or
traitor, or something generally disapproved of by society, such as the KKK
Accusing someone of immoral conductSuggesting occupational incompetence
Fault
A plaintiff must prove that the publication or broadcast station was at fault in one of two ways: negligence or actual malice.
Negligence
A private figure only has to prove the reporter did a sloppy job of checking facts.
Actual Malice or Reckless Disregard
A public figure has to prove that the reporter KNEW the information was false but went ahead and published it anyway.
The Bottom Line:
Ducks in a Row:
•Check your sources.
•Edit carefully.
•Save all your notes -- keep them organized.
•Don’t allow “off the record” interviews.
•Keep a log of what you have done and who you talked to!
What if it’s a simple mistake?
The newspaper can print a retraction, a statement that corrects the mistake.
Think:
What do we do if the newspaper only comes out weekly, or in our case, monthly?
Some more terms…
Privilege: media are privileged to print FAIR and ACCURATE reports of court proceedings, meetings, etc.
Fair Comment: if clearly labeled as opinion, it is protected from libel. This includes movie reviews, restaurant reviews.
Invasion of Privacy
Intrusion -- if you misrepresent yourself, trespass or surreptitiously use a camera to get the information. Bad idea!
Public Disclosure -- involving printing something that is accurate, but considered private
Invasion of Privacy
False Light -- portraying someone inaccurately to the point that he or she is embarrassed
Appropriation -- commercially exploiting someone’s name or image.
Obscenity
Whether a reasonable person applying community standards:
would find that the item appeals to prurient (sexual) interest.
Obviously offensive (gross, graphic or sleazy)Lacks literary, artistic, political or scientific
value.
Three Ethical Principles
Seek the truth and report it as fully as possible.
Act independently.
Minimize harm.
Careful…
Be careful of the difference between facts and opinion. You can say Suzie gave a poor performance, but you cannot say it was because she was out partying all night before the play.
K?
Legal Troubles!
RARELY do serious problems go so far as court. But when they do, the media lose 70 to 80 percent of the time!
Landmark Court Cases
In Scholastic Journalism
The Tinker Standard
Tinker vs. Des Moines (1969)Mary Beth and Christopher Tinker were
disciplined for wearing black arm bands protesting the Vietnam War to school.
Court ruled students had the right to express themselves as long as it did not “cause a substantial disruption” in school activities.
The Tinker Case
Tinker vs. Des Moines (1969)
Established a public forum role: published news, student editorials, letters, and is distributed outside the classroom.
The Tinker Case
“A student’s First Amendment rights do not stop at the schoolhouse door.”
The Hazelwood Decision
Hazelwood vs. Kuhlmeier (1988)Student editors sued the school
administration over the censorship of stories about teen pregnancy and children of divorced parents.
The Hazelwood Decision
Hazelwood vs. Kuhlmeier (1988)The Supreme Court determined the
school newspaper was NOT a public forum, and so not protected by the Tinker standard.
The Hazelwood Decision
A school-sponsored publication allowed school administration the right of prior review and content control.
The Hazelwood Decision
A School Sponsored Newspaper:
Under faculty supervisionPurpose is to teach skills or knowledgeUses the school’s name and resources
Under Hazelwood, censorship:
“Must reasonably relate to pedagogical concerns”
Back to the earlier question:
So…does freedom of the press exist today?
Wrap-Up
Effective journalism requires that you understand the rights AND responsibilities of the press!
Now -- go plan for your next assignment.