1
IIRR 550011
IInntteerrnnaattiioonnaall RReellaattiioonnss TThheeoorryy
Pınar Bilgin A328B
(290) 2164
http://www.bilkent.edu.tr/~pbilgin
by appointment
Aims
This course is designed as a post-graduate level introduction to International
Relations theory. The content and nature of International Relations theory is by no
means fixed. Indeed, International Relations theory has been the subject of intense
academic, intellectual and political debates. The main aim of this course is to
introduce students to main concepts of and major debates in International Relations
theory and deepen their insight into the dynamics of theory/practice.
Objectives
The objectives of this course are both subject-specific and general. General objectives
include the development of oral, written and research skills as the course requires
students to become able to read, absorb and critically assess a significant amount of
complex (and at times contradictory) material. The subject-specific objectives include
developing students’
understanding of what is meant by theory and why theorising is an
important enterprise;
knowledge and understanding of the key literature in the discipline;
knowledge and understanding of International Relations beyond their
immediate area of interest;
ability to locate their area of interest within the discipline;
ability to analyse practices of world politics from a conceptual
perspective;
ability to discuss in depth some of the main issues in International
Relations in theory and practice.
2
Teaching
Since the course is taught as a post-graduate level seminar, the onus is on you to read
widely around the topics. The seminars on occasions may include mini lectures
designed to introduce and/or contextualise that week’s topic, but you will be doing
most of the work. My role will be to provide a basic overview of that week’s topic,
offer you contending perspectives on the issues concerned, and seek to generate a
discussion structured around a set of questions. The aim is to encourage you to think
independently and critically whilst remaining firmly grounded in the knowledge
provided by the readings.
The reading list is by no means exhaustive. It should rather be viewed as a representative
sample of theoretical works. In the pages that follow, you will find a list of required and
further readings for each week. Our discussions will be based mostly on the required
readings. The lists of recommended texts are there to provide a broader context as well as
more detail, which may be useful as a starting point and reference for written assignments or
future studies.
What you should remember at all times is that good discussions depend on serious
preparation by students. You are strongly encouraged to read the texts carefully
and prepare written answers to the questions to ensure thorough preparation
especially in the first few weeks of the course when you are less experienced in
participating in seminars. It is critical that you do all your readings and come in
ready to take active part in class discussions. This is critical not only for your own
intellectual development but also because participation is 30% of your overall grade.
Please be reminded that you will only be in a position to do well in your assignments if you
have attended the classes and read the literature (all of the required texts plus some of the
recommended ones). Coming to the classes prepared is necessary not only because this
constitutes a part of your assessment, but also because this will help you understand the
course material much better so that you would be in a very strong position to do well in your
exams/assignments.
3
Assessment
30% of your assessment will be based on in-class participation. You will be expected
to demonstrate evidence of having read and thought about that week’s topic. Your
participation will be assessed on a weekly basis.
You are required to attend all the classes (in accordance with the University regulations). If
you cannot attend please let me know beforehand, or contact me (immediately) afterwards to
provide a ‘legitimate’ excuse for your absence. Attendance will be taken and absences will be
noted.
70% of your assessment will be based on a written assignment. This assignment will
have two parts, one theory-based, one empirical. The theory-based part (30%) is due
November 15, 2010, 17:30. The empirical part (30%) is due January 3, 2011, 17:30.
There will be a one-day workshop during the week of January 3, where all
assignments will be discussed and peer reviewed. Your participation in and
contributions to this workshop will also be assessed (10%). Revised written
assignments (parts 1 and 2 combined) are due January 10, 2011 17:30.
Since no more than one student will be allowed to sign up for each theory, you are strongly
encouraged to make your choices and e-mail me [email protected]. The theory-part of the
assignment is a literature review of the chosen theory (maximum 1500 words). The empirical
part of the assignment is structured in two parts: 1. A concise literature review of
applications of chosen theory (maximum 1500 words); 2. A short analysis of an empirical case
from the perspective of chosen theory (maximum 1000 words).
4
Please try to follow the requirements listed below when preparing your
assignments:
Be careful not to copy out great chunks from the assigned text or other articles/books.
This is at best weak and at worst plagiarism. Plagiarism consists of any form of
passing off, or attempting to pass off, the knowledge or work of other people as one's
own. It is a form of cheating and is considered an academic offence. The following
are simple guidelines to help you avoid such problems:
Surround all direct quotations with inverted commas and cite the precise source
(including page numbers) in a footnote.
Use quotations sparingly and make sure that the bulk of the essay is in your own
words.
Remember that it is 'what you say' that gives an essay merit.
Make sure you give references to your source(s) throughout the text, not just
when you give direct quotations but also when you paraphrase or give your
version.
Presentation
Each assignment should be typed.
State the number of words used at the end. The word limit is there to make you
decide what is or is not important to say. The ability to say what you want in a
limited number of words is also a skill you need to gain. Essays that are over
length will be penalised.
Appropriate footnotes and/or bibliography should be supplied.
Do not use single-spacing
Leave a sufficient margin for comments.
Pay attention to how you write the essay (your style) as well as its content. It is
important to develop your 'writing skills' as a student of International Relations.
5
What follows is a list of required/recommended readings for each week. Please
also consider the following studies for further research (in order of date of
publication): (Der Derian and Shapiro, 1989, Hollis and Smith, 1990, Rosenau and
Der Derian, 1993, Booth and Smith, 1995, Lebow and Risse-Kappen, 1995,
Burchill and Linklater, 1996, Smith et al., 1996b, Kubalkova et al., 1998b, Fry and
O'hagan, 2000, Jorgensen, 2000, Linklater, 2000, Chan et al., 2001, Crawford and
Jarvis, 2001, Elman and Elman, 2001, Carlsnaes et al., 2002, Brown, 2007, Devetak
et al., 2007, Chan and Moore, 2009, Tickner and Waever, 2009).1
Course Plan
Week 1
Week 2
Introduction: What is IR Theory (for)?
Required reading: (Sterling-Folker, 2006g, Smith, 2007)
Further reading: (George, 1994, Booth and Smith, 1995, Neufeld, 1995, Smith et al.,
1996a, Woods, 1996, Nicholson, 2000, Buzan and Little, 2001)
Week 3
(Neo)classical realism and its critics
Required reading: (Sterling-Folker, 2006h, Taliaferro, 2006, Lebow, 2007, Steele,
2007)
Further reading: (Carr, 1946, Herz, 1950, Rothstein, 1972, Morgenthau, 1985,
Wilson, 1998, Williams, 2004)
1 All required readings are available at the reserve desk of BU library. For edited books, ask for
the book, not the author of the chapter. All required articles are available on electronic reserve of
BU library. Recommended texts are available at BU Library. Please search the Library catalogue
or Electronic Sources to access them.
6
Week 4
The English School and its critics
Required reading: (Suzuki, 2004, Knudsen, 2006, Sterling-Folker, 2006c, Dunne,
2007)
Further reading: (Bull and Watson, 1984, Gong, 1984a, 1984b, Wight, 1991,
Watson, 1992, Bull, 1995, Dunne, 1995, 1998, Buzan, 2001)
Week 5
Liberalism and its critics
Required reading: (Panke and Risse, 2007, Barkawi and Laffey, 1999, Butler and
Boyer, 2006, Sterling-Folker, 2006f)
Further reading: (Doyle, 1986, Rosenau and Czempiel, 1992, Cohen, 1994,
Moravcsik, 1997)
Week 6
Structural realism and its critics
Required reading: (Adams, 2006, Quackenbush and Zagare, 2006, Mearsheimer,
2007, Williams 2009)
Further reading: (Waltz, 1959, 1979, Mearsheimer, 1990, Wendt, 1992, Baldwin,
1993a, Mearsheimer, 2009, Wæver 2009)
7
Week 7
Neoliberalism and its critics
Required reading: (Kay, 2006, Martin, 2007, Tsygankov and Tsygankov, 2007)
Further reading: (Keohane and Nye, 1987, Keohane, 1988, Keohane and Nye, 1989,
Baldwin, 1993b)
Week 8
Critical theory and its critics
Required reading: (Cafruny, 2006, Freyberg-Inan, 2006, Sterling-Folker, 2006e,
Hobson, 2007, Rupert, 2007)
Further reading: (Cox, 1981, 1987, Linklater, 1990a, 1990b, Cox, 1995, Cox and
Sinclair, 1996, Robinson, 1996, Linklater, 1997, Wallerstein, 2006)
Week 9
Constructivism and beyond?
Required reading: (Hoffmann, 2006, Jackson, 2006, Sterling-Folker, 2006b, Fierke,
2007, Sorensen, 2008)
Further reading: (Kratochwil, 1989, Onuf, 1989, Weldes, 1996, Weldes and Saco,
1996, Kubalkova et al., 1998a, Weldes, 1999, Weldes et al., 1999, Onuf, 2009)
8
Week 10
Feminism in IR
Required reading: (Agathangelou and Ling, 2004, D'amico, 2006, Mertus, 2006,
Sterling-Folker, 2006d, Tickner and Sjoberg, 2007)
Further reading: (Enloe, 1990, Peterson, 1992, Zalewski, 1995, Tickner, 1997, Enloe,
2000, Sylvester, 2002)
Week 11
Postmodernism/poststructuralism and its critics
Required reading: (Spegele, 2002, Falger and Van Der Dennen, 2006, Shinko, 2006,
Sterling-Folker, 2006a, Campbell, 2007)
Further reading: (Campbell, 1992, 1993, Weber, 1998, Edkins, 1999, Weber, 1999)
Week 12
Globalisation and IR theory
Required reading: (Freyberg-Inan, 2006, Hay 2007, Halperin, 2006)
Further reading: (Clark, 1997, Clark, 1998, Held and Mcgrew, 1998, Clark, 1999,
Falk, 2000, Scholte, 2000)
9
Week 13
Political theory, the political and international relations
Required reading: (Brown, 2007, Grovogui, 2007)
Further reading: (Linklater, 1990b, Walker, 1993, Williams et al., 1993, Grovogui,
2006)
Week 13
IR: Still a discipline?
Required reading: (Waever, 2007, Bilgin, 2008)
Further reading: (Lebow and Risse-Kappen, 1995, Tickner, 2003, Tickner and
Wæver, 2008, Agathangelou and Ling, 2009, Ching-Chane Hwang and Ling,
2009, Tickner and Waever, 2009)
Week 14
International Relations and Social Science
Required reading: (Hollis and Smith, 1990, Kurki and Wight, 2007)
Further reading: (Cox, 1981, Waever, 1998, Wendt, 1999, 2000, Wight, 2002,
Guilhot, 2008)
10
Bibliography
Adams, K. R. (2006) Structural Realism: The Consequences of Great Power
Politics. In Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of International Relations
Theory. Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers: 18-37.
Agathangelou, A. & L. H. M. Ling (2004) Power, Borders, Security, Wealth:
Lessons of Violence and Desire from September 11. International Studies
Quarterly 48, 517-538.
Agathangelou, A. M. & L. H. M. Ling (2009) Transforming World Politics from
Empire to Multiple Worlds, Routledge.
Baldwin, D. A. (1993a) Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate,
New York, Columbia University Press.
Baldwin, D. A. E. (1993b) Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate,
New York, Columbia University Press.
Barkawi, T. & M. Laffey (1999) The Imperial Peace: Democracy, Force and
Globalization. European Journal of International Relations, 5, 403-434.
Bilgin, P. (2008) Thinking Past ‘Western’ IR? Third World Quarterly, 29, 5-23.
Booth, K. & S. Smith (1995) International Relations Theory Today, Cambridge, Polity
Press.
Brown, C. (2007) International Relations as Political Theory. in Dunne, T., Kurki,
M. & Smith, S. (Eds.) International Relations Theories: Discipline and
Diversity. New York, Oxford University Press: 34-51.
Bull, H. (1995) The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, London,
Macmillan.
Bull, H. & A. Watson (Eds.) (1984) The Expansion of International Society, Oxford
Clarendon Press.
Burchill, S. & A. Linklater (1996) Theories of International Relations, New York, St.
Martin's Press.
Butler, M. J. & M. A. Boyer (2006) Public Goods Liberalism: The Problems of
Collective Action. in Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of International
Relations Theory. Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers: 75-91.
Buzan, B. (2001) The English School: An Underexploited Resource in IR. Review of
International Studies, 27, 471-488.
Buzan, B. & R. Little (2001) Why International Relations Has Failed as an
Intellectual Project and What to Do About It. Millennium-Journal of
International Studies, 30, 19-+.
Cafruny, A. W. (2006) Historical Materialism: Imperialist Rivalry and the Global
Capitalist Order. in Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of International
Relations Theory. Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers: 209-224.
11
Campbell, D. (1992) Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of
Identity, Manchester, Manchester University Press.
Campbell, D. (1993) Politics without Principle: Sovereignty, Ethics and the Narratives
the Gulf War, Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Campbell, D. (2007) Poststructuralism. in Dunne, T., Kurki, M. & Smith, S. (Eds.)
International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. New York, Oxford
University Press: 203-228.
Carlsnaes, W., T. Risse-Kappen & B. A. Simmons (2002) Handbook of International
Relations, London ; Thousand Oaks, Calif., SAGE Publications.
Carr, E. H. (1946) The Twenty Years' Crisis, 1919-1939: An Introduction to the Study
of International Relations, London, Macmillan.
Chan, S., P. G. Mandaville & R. Bleiker (Eds.) (2001) The Zen of International
Relations: IR Theory from East to West, London, Palgrave Macmillan.
Chan, S. & C. Moore (2009) Approaches to International Relations, Los Angeles ;
London, SAGE.
Ching-Chane Hwang, B. C. & L. H. M. Ling (2009) Lust/Caution in IR:
Democratising World Politics with Culture as a Method. Millennium -
Journal of International Studies, 37, 743-766.
Clark, I. (1997) Globalization and Fragmentation: International Relations in the
Twentieth Century, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Clark, I. (1998) Beyond the Great Divide: Globalization and the Theory of
International Relations. Review of International Studies, 24, 479-498.
Clark, I. (1999) Globalization and International Relations Theory, Oxford, Oxford
University Press.
Cohen, R. (1994) Pacific Unions: A Reappraisal of the Theory That 'Democracies
Do Not Go to War with Each Other'. Review of International Studies, 20, 207-
223.
Cox, R. W. (1981) Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International
Relations Theory. Millennium-Journal of International Studies, 10, 126-155.
Cox, R. W. (1987) Production, Power, and World Order : Social Forces in the Making of
History, New York, Columbia University Press.
Cox, R. W. (1995) Approaches to World Order, New York, Cambridge University
Press.
Cox, R. W. & T. J. Sinclair (1996) Approaches to World Order, Cambridge ; New
York, Cambridge University Press.
Crawford, R. A. & D. S. Jarvis (Eds.) (2001) IR - Still an American Social Science:
Toward Diversity in International Thought, Albany, NY, State University of
New York Press.
12
D'amico, F. (2006) Critical Feminism: Deconstructing Gender, Nationalism, and
War. in Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of International Relations
Theory. Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers: 268-281.
Der Derian, J. & M. J. Shapiro (1989) International/Intertextual Relations :
Postmodern Readings of World Politics, Lexington, Mass., Lexington Books.
Devetak, R., A. Burke & J. George (2007) Introduction to International Relations :
Australian Perspectives, Cambridge ; New York, Cambridge University
Press.
Doyle, M. (1986) Liberalism and World Politics. American Political Science Review,
80, 1151-1169.
Dunne, T. (1995) The Social Construction of International Society. European
Journal of International Relations, 1, 367-389.
Dunne, T. (1998) Inventing International Society: A History of the English School,
New York, St. Martin's Press.
Dunne, T. (2007) The English School. in Dunne, T., Kurki, M. & Smith, S. (Eds.)
International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. New York, Oxford
University Press: 127-147.
Edkins, J. (1999) Poststructuralism and International Relations: Bringing the Political
Back In, Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Elman, C. & M. F. Elman (Eds.) (2001) Bridges and Boundaries: Historians, Political
Scientists and the Study of International Relations, Cambridge, MA, MIT
Press.
Enloe, C. (1990) Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International
Politics, Berkeley, University of California Press.
Enloe, C. H. (2000) Maneuvers: The International Politics of Militarizing Women's
Lives, Berkeley, University of California Press.
Falger, V. S. E. & J. M. G. Van Der Dennen (2006) Biopolitics: Evolutionary
History and Modern Conflict. in Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of
International Relations Theory. Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers: 288-301.
Falk, R. A. (2000) Predatory Globalization: A Critique, Cambridge, Polity Press.
Fierke, K. M. (2007) Constructivism. in Dunne, T., Kurki, M. & Smith, S. (Eds.)
International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. New York, Oxford
University Press: 166-184.
Freyberg-Inan, A. (2006) World System Theory: A Bird's-Eye View of the World
Capitalist Order. in Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of International
Relations Theory. Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers: 225-241.
Fry, G. & J. O'hagan (Eds.) (2000) Contending Images of World Politics, London,
Macmillan Press.
George, J. (1994) Discourses of Global Politics: Critical (Re)Introduction to
International Relations, Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers.
13
Gong, G. W. (1984a) China's Entry into International Society. in Bull, H. &
Watson, A. (Eds.) The Expansion of International Society. Oxford, Clarendon
Press: 171-183.
Gong, G. W. (1984b) The Standart Of "Civilization" In International Society, Oxford
University Press.
Grovogui, S. N. (2006) Beyond Eurocentrism and Anarchy: Memories of International
Order and Institutions, New York, Palgrave Macmillan.
Grovogui, S. N. (2007) Postcolonialism. in Dunne, T., Kurki, M. & Smith, S. (Eds.)
International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. New York, Oxford
University Press: 229-246.
Guilhot, N. (2008) The Realist Gambit: Postwar American Political Science and
the Birth of Ir Theory. International Political Sociology, 2, 281-396.
Halperin, S. (2006) International Relations Theory and the Hegemony of Western
Conceptions of Modernity. in Jones, B. G. (Ed.) Decolonizing International
Relations. Lanham, Rowman & Littlefield: 43-63.
Hay, C. (2007) International Relations Theory and Globalization. in Dunne, T.,
Kurki, M. & Smith, S. (Eds.) International Relations Theories: Discipline and
Diversity. New York, Oxford University Press: 266-287.
Held, D. & A. Mcgrew (1998) The End of the Old Order? Globalization and the
Prospects for World Order. Review of International Studies, 24, 219-243.
Herz, J. H. (1950) Idealist Internationalism and the Security Dilemma. World
Politics, 2, 157-180.
Hobson, J. M. (2007) Is Critical Theory Always for the White West and Western
Imperialism? Beyond Westphilian Towards a Post-Racist Critical IR.
Review of International Studies, 33, 91-116.
Hoffmann, M. J. (2006) Social (De)Construction: The Failure of a Multinational
State. in Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of International Relations
Theory. Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers: 123-138.
Hollis, M. & S. Smith (1990) Explaining and Understanding International Relations,
New York, Oxford University Press.
Jackson, P. T. (2006) Relational Constructivism: A War of Words. in Sterling-
Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of International Relations Theory. Boulder,
Lynne Rienner Publishers: 139-155.
Jorgensen, K. E. (2000) Continental IR Theory: The Best Kept Secret. European
Journal of International Relations, 6, 9-42.
Kay, S. (2006) Neoliberalism: Institutions at War. in Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.)
Making Sense of International Relations Theory. Boulder, Lynne Rienner
Publishers: 62-74.
Keohane, R. O. (1988) International Institutions: Two Approaches. International
Studies Quarterly, 32, 379-396
14
Keohane, R. O. & J. S. Nye (1987) Power and Interdependence Revisited.
International Organization, 41, 725-753.
Keohane, R. O. & J. S. Nye (1989) Power and Interdependence, Glenview, Scott,
Foresman/Little Brown College Divison.
Knudsen, T. B. (2006) The English School: Sovereignty and International Law. in
Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of International Relations Theory.
Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers: 311-326.
Kratochwil, F. V. (1989) Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical
and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs,
Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Kubalkova, V., N. G. Onuf & P. Kowert (1998a) International Relations in a
Constructed World, New York, M. E. Sharpe.
Kubalkova, V., N. G. Onuf & P. E. Kowert (1998b) International Relations in a
Constructed World, New York, M. E. Sharpe.
Kurki, M. & C. Wight (2007) International Relations and Social Science. in Dunne,
T., Kurki, M. & Smith, S. (Eds.) International Relations Theories: Discipline
and Diversity. New York, Oxford University Press: 13-33.
Lebow, R. N. (2007) Classical Realism. in Dunne, T., Kurki, M. & Smith, S. (Eds.)
International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. New York, Oxford
University Press: 52-70.
Lebow, R. N. & T. Risse-Kappen (1995) International Relations Theory and the End of
the Cold War, New York, Columbia University Press.
Linklater, A. (1990a) Beyond Realism and Marxism: Critical Theory and International
Relations, Basingstoke, Macmillan.
Linklater, A. (1990b) Men and Citizens in the Theory of International Relations,
London, Macmillan in association with the London School of Economics
and Political Science.
Linklater, A. (1997) The Transformation of Political Community: E.H. Carr,
Critical Theory and International Relations. Review of International Studies,
23, 321-338.
Linklater, A. (2000) International Relations : Critical Concepts in Political Science,
London ; New York, Routledge.
Martin, L. L. (2007) Neoliberalism. in Dunne, T., Kurki, M. & Smith, S. (Eds.)
International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. New York, Oxford
University Press: 109-126.
Mearsheimer, J. J. (1990) Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold
War. International Security, 15, 5-56.
Mearsheimer, J. J. (2007) Structural Realism. in Dunne, T., Kurki, M. & Smith, S.
(Eds.) International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. New York,
Oxford University Press: 71-88.
15
Mearsheimer, J. J. (2009) Reckless States and Realism. International Relations, 23,
241-256.
Mertus, J. (2006) Liberal Feminism: Local Narratives in a Gendered Context. in
Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of International Relations Theory.
Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers: 252-267.
Moravcsik, A. (1997) Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of
International Politics. International Organization, 51, 513-553.
Morgenthau, H. J. (1985) Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace,
New York, Knopf: Distributed by Random House.
Neufeld, M. A. (1995) The Restructuring of International Relations Theory,
Cambridge; New York, Cambridge University Press.
Nicholson, M. (2000) What's the Use of International Relations? Review of
International Studies, 26, 183-198.
Onuf, N. G. (1989) World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and
International Relations, Columbia, University of South Carolina Press.
Onuf, N. G. (2009) Structure? What Structure? International Relations, 23, 183-199.
Panke, D. & T. Risse (2007) Liberalism. in Dunne, T., Kurki, M. & Smith, S. (Eds.)
International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. New York, Oxford
University Press: 89-108.
Peterson, V. S. (1992) Gendered States: Feminist (Re)Visions of International Relations
Theory, Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Quackenbush, S. L. & F. C. Zagare (2006) Game Theory: Modeling Interstate
Conflict. in Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of International Relations
Theory. Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers: 98-114.
Robinson, W. I. (1996) Promoting Polyarchy: Globalization, Us Intervention, and
Hegemony, Cambridge; New York, Cambridge University Press.
Rosenau, J. N. & E.-O. Czempiel (1992) Governance without Government: Order and
Change in World Politics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Rosenau, J. N. & J. Der Derian (1993) Global Voices : Dialogues in International
Relations, Boulder, Westview Press.
Rothstein, R. L. (1972) On the Costs of Realism. Political Science Quarterly, 87, 347-
362.
Rupert, M. (2007) Marxism and Critical Theory. in Dunne, T., Kurki, M. & Smith,
S. (Eds.) International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. New York,
Oxford University Press: 148-165.
Scholte, J. A. (2000) Globalization: A Critical Introduction, New York, St. Martin's
Press.
Shinko, R. E. (2006) Postmodernism: A Genealogy of Humanitarian Intervention.
in Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of International Relations Theory.
Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers: 168-181.
16
Smith, S. (2007) Introduction: Diversity and Disciplinarity in International
Relations Theory. in Dunne, T., Kurki, M. & Smith, S. (Eds.) International
Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. New York, Oxford University
Press: 1-12.
Smith, S., K. Booth & M. Zalewski (1996a) International Theory : Positivism and
Beyond, Cambridge ; New York, Cambridge University Press.
Smith, S., K. Booth & M. E. Zalewski (1996b) International Theory: Positivism and
Beyond, New York, Cambridge University Press.
Sorensen, G. (2008) The Case for Combining Material Forces and Ideas in the
Study of IR. European Journal of International Relations, 14, 5-32.
Spegele, R. D. (2002) Emancipatory International Relations: Good News, Bad
News or No News at All? International Relations, 16, 381-401.
Steele, B. J. (2007) 'Eavesdropping on Honored Ghosts': From Classical to
Reflexive Realism. Journal of International Relations and Development, 10,
272-300.
Sterling-Folker, J. (2006a) Biopolitics. in Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of
International Relations Theory. Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers: 283-287.
Sterling-Folker, J. (2006b) Constructivism. in Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense
of International Relations Theory. Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers: 115-
122.
Sterling-Folker, J. (2006c) The English School. in Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making
Sense of International Relations Theory. Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers:
303-310.
Sterling-Folker, J. (2006d) Feminism. in Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of
International Relations Theory. Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers: 243-251.
Sterling-Folker, J. (2006e) Historical Materialism and World System Theory. in
Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of International Relations Theory.
Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers: 199-208.
Sterling-Folker, J. (2006f) Liberalism. in Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of
International Relations Theory. Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers: 55-61.
Sterling-Folker, J. (2006g) Making Sense of International Relations Theory. in
Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of International Relations Theory.
Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers: 1-11.
Sterling-Folker, J. (2006h) Realism. in Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of
International Relations Theory. Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers: 13-17.
Suzuki, S. (2004) China's Perceptions of International Society in the Nineteenth
Century: Learning More About Power Politics? Asian Perspective, 28, 115-
144.
Sylvester, C. (2002) Feminist International Relations: An Unfinished Journey, New
York, Cambridge University Press.
17
Taliaferro, J. W. (2006) Neoclassical Realism: The Psychology of Great Power
Intervention. in Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of International
Relations Theory. Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers: 38-53.
Tickner, A. & O. Wæver (2008) International Relations Scholarship around the World,
Routledge.
Tickner, A. & O. Waever (2009) Global Scholarship in International Relations:
Worlding Beyond the West, New York, Routledge.
Tickner, J. A. (1997) You Just Don't Understand: Troubled Engagements between
Feminists and IR Theorists. International Studies Quarterly, 41, 611-632.
Tickner, J. A. (2003) Seeing IR Differently: Notes from the Third World.
Millennium-Journal of International Studies, 32, 295-324.
Tickner, J. A. & L. Sjoberg (2007) Feminism. In Dunne, T., Kurki, M. & Smith, S.
(Eds.) International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. New York,
Oxford University Press: 185-202.
Tsygankov, A. P. & P. A. Tsygankov (2007) A Sociology of Dependence in
International Relations Theory: A Case of Russian Liberal IR. International
Political Sociology, 1, 307-324.
Waever, O. (1998) The Sociology of a Not So International Discipline: American
and European Developments in International Relations. International
Organization, 52, 687-727.
Wæver, O. (2007) IR: Still a discipline? In Dunne, T., Kurki, M. & Smith, S. (Eds.)
International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. New York, Oxford
University Press:
Waever, O. (2009) Waltz's Theory of Theory. International Relations, 23, 201-222.
Walker, R. B. J. (1993) Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory,
Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Wallerstein, I. M. (2006) World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction, Durham, Duke
University Press.
Waltz, K. N. (1959) Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis, New York,
Columbia University Press.
Waltz, K. N. (1979) Theory of International Politics, New York, Random House.
Watson, A. (1992) The Evolution of International Society : A Comparative Historical
Analysis, London ; New York, Routledge.
Weber, C. (1998) Performative States. Millennium-Journal of International Studies,
27, 77-+.
Weber, C. (1999) IR: The Resurrection or New Frontiers of Incorporation.
European Journal of International Relations, 5, 435-450.
Weldes, J. (1996) Constructing National Interests. European Journal of International
Relations, 2, 275-318.
18
Weldes, J. (1999) Constructing National Interests: The United States and the Cuban
Missile Crisis, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.
Weldes, J., M. Laffey, H. Gusterson & R. Duvall (1999) Introduction:
Constructing Insecurity. in Weldes, J., Laffey, M., Gusterson, H. & Duvall,
R. (Eds.) Cultures of Insecurity: States, Communities, and the Production of
Danger. Minneapolis, MN, University of Minnesota Press: 1-33.
Weldes, J. & D. Saco (1996) Making State Action Possible: The United States and
the Discursive Construction of 'the Cuban Problem', 1960-1994.
Millennium-Journal of International Studies, 25, 361-395.
Wendt, A. (1992) Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of
Power Politics. International Organization, 46, 391-425.
Wendt, A. (1999) Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge; New York,
Cambridge University Press.
Wendt, A. (2000) On the Via Media: A Response to the Critics. Review of
International Studies, 26, 165-180.
Wight, C. (2002) Philosophy of Social Science and International Relations. in
Carlsnaes, W., Risse, T. & Simmons, B. A. (Eds.) Handbook of International
Relations. London, SAGE Publications: 23-51.
Wight, M. (1991) International Theory: The Three Traditions, London, Leicester
University Press for the Royal Institute of International Affairs.
Williams, H., M. Wright & T. Evans (1993) A Reader in International Relations and
Political Theory, Buckingham, Open University Press.
Williams, M. C. (2004) Why Ideas Matter in International Relations: Hans
Morgenthau, Classical Realism, and the Moral Construction of Power
Politics. International Organization, 58, 633-665.
Williams, M. C. (2009) Waltz, Realism and Democracy. International Relations, 23:
328-340.
Wilson, P. (1998) The Myth of the 'First Great Debate'. Review of International
Studies, 24, 1-16.
Woods, N. (1996) Explaining International Relations since 1945, New York, Oxford
University Press.
Zalewski, M. (1995) Well, What Is the Feminist Perspective on Bosnia?
International Affairs, 71, 339-356.