-
7/29/2019 Innovation Strategy Visual Mapping Tool-Abstract
1/22
-
7/29/2019 Innovation Strategy Visual Mapping Tool-Abstract
2/22
ABSTRACT
An Innovation Strategy can be a keystone for companies to build competitive
advantage and achieve results through Innovation. In highly competitive
fast-changing environment, typical of some sectors of business like
High-Technology, this process can be even more crucial for organizational
renewal. Despite this importance, there is a shortage of structured methods and
tools to support the creation of an Innovation Strategy. This study, taking in
consideration the organizational context of companies in this type of environment:
High competition, Pressure for Continuous Product Launching, Complexity of
modern issues, Information overload and Time famine, developed a Visual
Strategy tool to facilitate the process of creating an Innovation Strategy. This
study designed this tool by, identifying and selecting, the most appropriate
Innovation and Strategy frameworks for the purpose of creating an Innovation
Strategy. These elements were integrated into Visual Map Template, developed
using Visualization techniques. Along with the Map template a process was
developed aiming to stimulate creativity and collaboration of the participants of this
strategizing process. The main focus of this process was to support the tasks of
Idea Management and Sensemaking. The process developed aims to support the
creation of a big picture scenario of the most interesting paths for innovation.
Looking, particularly, for Innovation Paths which could leverage distinctive
competences of the organization, and explore alternatives to create new markets.
Overall, this study proposes that a process of idea management and sensemaking,
supported by conversations guided by a tool, can be crucial for creating the future
of the organization through Innovation.
-
7/29/2019 Innovation Strategy Visual Mapping Tool-Abstract
3/22
/,672)&217(176
,1752'8&7,21 'HILQLQJWKHSUREOHP 0RWLYDWLRQ &RQWH[W 6WDUWLQJ3RLQW 6FRSH
/,7(5$785(5(9,(: ,QQRYDWLRQ6WUDWHJ\ 6WUDWHJ\7RROV6WUDWHJ\ )RUHVLJKW 9LVXDOL]DWLRQ9LVXDOL]DWLRQWRROV 7KH*DS
5(6($5&+)5$0(:25. 0HWKRGRORJ\ 5HVHDUFK4XHVWLRQV 0HWKRG 8VHUFHQWUHG'HVLJQ $QDORJ\ &RQFHSWXDOIUDPHZRUN
.(
-
7/29/2019 Innovation Strategy Visual Mapping Tool-Abstract
4/22
&RPELQLQJDOOWKHSLHFHVLQWRD0DS 5HOHYDQWDVSHFWVRIWKH0DS7HPSODWHWRWKH7DVNV
'HVLJQLQJWRILWWKH7RRO&RQWH[W ',6&866,21
5HVHDUFK6WUHQJWKV 5HVHDUFK/LPLWDWLRQV 'RHVXVDELOLW\OHDGWRDGRSWLRQ"
&21&/86,216 5()(5(1&(6
-
7/29/2019 Innovation Strategy Visual Mapping Tool-Abstract
5/22
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Defining the problem
Innovation is the most effective process to win a competitive game (Utterback
1994; Hamel&Prahalad 1994; Markides 1997; Kim&Mauborgne 1999), sometimes
it can be the only way for companies to stay in the game (Tushman&Anderson
1986, 1997; Christensen 1997; Christensen et al. 2004). But what is an innovation?
And where does it come from? Innovation is defined as the transformation of an
idea into something of value, e.g. a new product or process (Tidd&Bessant, 2009).
Does that mean that any idea has the same chances of turning into an innovation,
and thus should be pursued? How one could increase the likelihood of success of
a chosen idea? And by this, better exploit limited resources such as time and
money. One known way of having good ideas is by having a lot of them
(Rietzschel et al. 2007). Another way is by exploring new paths and the road less
travelled (Rietzschel et al. 2007).
But how can one increase the number of ideas produced? Brainstorming by
making a list of ideas is a known way of increasing the number of ideas. Another is
to be exposed to fresh stimuli, e.g. novel concepts from another area or person.
By placing together different perspectives and experiences one might increase the
chances of novel combination of ideas (Johnson, 2010).
Still, are plenty of ideas enough? How can one select the best ideas? How can
one judge ex-ante the quality of an idea? The quality of an idea is usually
measured by its novelty and usefulness, which is defined as creativity (Amabile,
1996). This assessment of quality became even more challenging when one
id th t i ti ti l l th t h l i ht t k l
-
7/29/2019 Innovation Strategy Visual Mapping Tool-Abstract
6/22
increasing the chances of success (Fuglsang&Mattsson, 2011). Imagining different
possible futures, and switching between them, might allow evaluating which idea is
more likely to be fruitful (Fahey&Randall, 1998).
Even considering one have several potentially good ideas. How these ideas are
managed to be transformed into an innovation, particularly in an organizational
context, is still a challenge. The strategizing process will influence heavily on the
results (Hamel&Prahalad 1994; Porter 1985; Mintzberg et al. 2008). Anthony et al.
(2006, p.1) nailed the point: Many companies approach innovation without agame plan [a strategy] that position them for success Their unsystematic efforts
to create growth lead to random and often disappointing results.
1.2 Motivation
There are some key drivers that motivate this study:
Idea management is the most impacting process on results coming from
innovation, such as sales of new products (Arthur D. Little, 2005);
Successful strategies, one that turns an idea into a great innovation, up to
now seems to have had serendipity as the key element (Johnston&Bate,2003). Apart from a few examples like Swatch, NEC and Komatsu there is a
shortage on creative strategy creation;
Industry is left with little help and few tools on how to create strategy, or
how to make it emerge by creating the right conditions (Hamel 1998a;
Johnston& Bate 2003).
1.3 Context
-
7/29/2019 Innovation Strategy Visual Mapping Tool-Abstract
7/22
Mar 2012) reported results of a study indicating that: in 1937 a business that
would have been listed in the S&P 500 could have expected to spend 75 years in
that distinguished index; today, the average stay is down to about 15 years.
Samsung is a clear example of those who are winning in this fast paced game
(Strategic Direction, 2006), and Nokia is an example of those who were left behind.
Even the powerful Apple is starting to struggle to keep up with its pace of new
product launching (Financial Times, July 25 2012).
Complexity: modern products reached a level of complexity unparallel. A
commercial aircraft can have more than 25,000 different parts. Wood (2000)
reported that in 1999 a study in the Citibank showed that the bank had 150,000
different versions of a deposit account.
Time Famine: Whether because the higher competitive world made us more
multitasking on this never ending race, or this is just a consequence of our
perception of time scarcity (now intensified by the increase of economic value of
time as assessed by the opportunity cost), the general feeling is of playing catch-
up (The Wall Street Journal, 22 February 2011 based on the article "Time Is Tight"
of the Journal of Applied Psychology). Weak signals of time famine can be seen
on corporate world by the increasing demand of management pill size theory, now
on visual format, to be quickly digested (reported by Financial Times, 8 February
2012).
Information Overload
The current society lives under enormous strain to cope with the accelerating rate
of information and knowledge. The technological developments of the last 50
years have made more information, more available, to more people than at any
-
7/29/2019 Innovation Strategy Visual Mapping Tool-Abstract
8/22
application of visualization methods, meaningful visual presentation of information,
can help the limited simultaneous cognitive processing of the brain. Research has
showed that Information Visualization has proven to help the cognitive process of
identifying patterns and relations between large amounts of information (Keim et al.
2006).
We see what we believe
But despite any techniques to improve our cognitive capacity, like information
visualization, one still has to rely on a heuristic model (a mental model) to decide
where to look and what to pay to attention. Nonetheless, in an ever changing
environment the rules of the game might be changing faster than one can cope.
Thus, automatically turning to cognitive shortcuts, like mental model, to guide
attention and perception might prove a risk strategy if this mental model is
outdated. The financial crisis of 2008 proved that every model real estate is
always is a good investment has a time and context.
Seeing what others see confers no relative competitive advantage. Instead,
like Sherlock Holmes, we should strive to observe what others merely
see(Neugarten, 2006, p.895).
There is more in the world than the eye would notice. The eye is guided by the
brain on what it should see so that rather than seeing is believing, it appears that
believing is seeingwe see what we expect. (Neugarten, 2006, p.895)
After setting this scenario of interconnected elements: globalization, competition,
complexity, time famine, information-overload, mental models, innovation and
strategy an important reflection comes up:
-
7/29/2019 Innovation Strategy Visual Mapping Tool-Abstract
9/22
How can an organization make sense of this changing environment and devise
renewal strategies (organizational innovation strategies) that increase the
likelihood of success in the future?
1.4 Starting Point
To find the answer for this previous reflection requires evaluating the purpose and
conditions of this mission (as described previously) and what it is available out
there to execute this mission. It certainly there is a lot of research on innovation
(overview at Tidd&Bessant,2009), and similarly there is a well developed body of
research on Strategy mainly clustered around some paradigms (Teece et al. 1997;
Mintzberg et al. 2008; Moussetis 2011). Nonetheless, there is a shortage on the
strategy process theory, particularly on how to create or make one emerge (Hamel,
1998a). This shortage is evident on the lack of clear guidance and tools to put this
crucial task into practice.
There are two key elements that guided the beginning of this search for a more
practical strategy process:
On the conceptual level: Hamel&Prahalad (1994) book.
On the practical level: Osterwalder (2004) tool Business model canvas
1.5 Scope
The ultimate goal of this study is to help organizations to increase the likelihood of
success of innovation by facilitating the innovation strategy process through theuse a visual strategy tool.
To work towards this goal this study aims to identify the most updated methods
-
7/29/2019 Innovation Strategy Visual Mapping Tool-Abstract
10/22
Considering that idea management and sensemaking are becoming crucial tasks
for innovation, particularly in fast changing environments as discussed previously,
the core of the mission is established as:
The core of the mission:
Designing a tool for ideas management and sensemaking with the purpose
of facilitating the innovation strategy process.
Figure 1.1: The core of the mission
The choice of visualization, as the interface between user and the tool, is based
mainly on two aspects:
User requirements: information overload, cognitive limitations, time famine,
d i
-
7/29/2019 Innovation Strategy Visual Mapping Tool-Abstract
11/22
Figure 1.2: The Concept of the Tool
The concept of the tool is based on a template applied to the wall that would allow
collecting and displaying, information and ideas, on a map of context. It is
expected that the visualization would foster creativity, collaboration and also help
sensemaking the big picture by a holistic approach.
The tool is designed based on the premise of the main purpose of an innovation
strategy process being to identify and discuss possible migration paths (in this
case innovation paths) which could lead the present organization into a future
renewed organization. Innovation (e.g. a new product, new process, new
competence) is seen as a source of renewal of the competitive advantage and the
th th ti f i ti il bl t th F thi
-
7/29/2019 Innovation Strategy Visual Mapping Tool-Abstract
12/22
2 LITERATURE REVIEW
Once one take over the mission of designing a tool aimed at facilitating the
innovation strategy process, some elements to build this tool are clearly visible,
others not so much. Sometimes an element can be seen and be composed from
different bodies of research. To guide this process the ultimate goal of this study,
as established on scope section, will direct the selection of elements to compose
this tool.
Table 2.1: Ultimate goals guiding the designing process
Ultimate goalHelp organization to Increase the likelihood of success ofinnovation through the creation of innovation strategy
Goal Facilitate the innovation strategy process
Mission Designing a tool
Type Strategy tool
Channel Visualization
From Table 2.1 it is possible to see this mission involves at least following areas:
Innovation ( Innovation Strategy)
Strategy (Strategy Tools)
Visualization (Visualization Tools)
2.1 Innovation Strategy
Why is Innovation Strategy important?
As discussed in the introduction, if one understands the importance of innovation
on building competitive advantage and appropriating returns from it (Teece, 1986),
the innovation process (Tidd&Bessant, 2009) is seen through new lens. In this
view the innovation is the prize of the game, the innovation strategy is about
thinking ahead on the options of how you are going to play this game in order to
win (or if you should play at all), and innovation process is how to play once you
-
7/29/2019 Innovation Strategy Visual Mapping Tool-Abstract
13/22
Innovation Strategy Content How to combine the components? And why?
A survey conducted by management consultants Booz Allen Hamilton concluded
that there is no one size fits all best innovation strategy, however there is a best
innovation strategy specific for a company. This specific best strategy will
depend of corporate strategy and competitive environment (Jaruzelski&Dehoff,
2007). Dodgson et al. (2008) argue similarly that organizations should build an
innovation strategy that fit the company size, business life-stage and environment.
Despite the impossibility of an innovation strategy recipe, there is an agreement on
the most important drivers to create an innovation strategy, and capture value from
it, as being: Technology, Customers Needs, and Markets (Anthony et al. 2006;
Jaruzelski&Dehoff 2007; Dodgson et al. 2008; Katz et. al. 2010).
Jaruzelski&Dehoff (2007) defined these drivers as:
1) Technology drivers (scouting and developing new technology);
2) Needs seekers (identifying emerging customers needs);
3) Market readers (strong competitor analysis).
Despite a common agreement on the most important drivers of Innovation
Strategy, how to choose and combine the others components in order to increase
the chances of success, seems to be a case-by-case process. Hess (2010) after
studying several large companies described 4 main innovation strategies that led
those companies to successful results. 1) Good Recruiting and Human Capital
management; 2) Internal R&D investment; 3) Strategic Alliances; 4) Acquisitions.
Similarly, Bowonder et al. (2010), after studying the innovation strategy of 100
innovative global companies identified 3 main dimensions (areas of focus) of these
strategies: 1) Customer Excitement, 2) Competitive Leadership and 3) Portfolio
-
7/29/2019 Innovation Strategy Visual Mapping Tool-Abstract
14/22
3 RESEARCH FRAMEWORK
Before starting the definition of the research framework, it is important to clarify
some points. Despite the core of the mission of this study being to design a
strategy tool focused on supporting the idea management and sensemaking tasks,
the interconnectedness and far-reaching level these tasks will have through the
strategy creation process, required setting a clear picture of the research context.
This research context has been set through the discussions and contextualization
presented in the introduction, and is illustrated on the fig. 3.1.
Figure 3.1: Research Context and Research focus
This research context is crucial to clarify the goals requirements and
-
7/29/2019 Innovation Strategy Visual Mapping Tool-Abstract
15/22
47
Table 5.3: Tool Content - Frameworks and Methods selected
Innovation Strategy
ConstructsKey Definition required Method/Framework Selected
Framework Representative
AuthorsKey elements Selected
Where we are(position)
OrganizationsPosition
Porter 5 forcesEconomic EngineRPV (Resources-Process-Values)Core CompetencesDisruptive innovation
Porter (1985)Hamel&Prahalad(1994)Christensen et al.(2004)Hamel&Prahalad(1990)Christensen (1997)
Suppliers, Customers,Competitors, Competences,Resources, Process,Values, Technology,
Core CompetencesRBV (Resource-based-View)Dynamic Capabilities
Hamel&Prahalad (1990)Teece (1980,1982)Teece (1997)
Core competencesUnique Resources
Strategic innovation Markides(1997) Business Key QuestionsMarket vs. Resources
Environment ScanningSWOT
Aguillar(1967), Choo (2001)Ansoff, (1987)
PEST Trends,Opportunity, Threats
RPV (Resources-Process-Values) Christensen et al.(2004) Resources, Process,Values,
Present vs. future
Foresight : Scenarios Fahey& Randall(1998) Scenarios
Where to look(sources of competitive
advantage)
Internal vs. External
Sources of InnovationBest Idea SourcesPeripheral Vision
Open Innovation
Tidd&Bessant (2009)Cooper& Edgett (2008)Day&Schoemaker (2005)
Chesbrough(2006)
Best Innovation Ideasources,Peripheral Vision,
Open InnovationNew ProductBusiness Model InnovationNon-consumersCompetence Building
Cooper (1990)Teece (2010),Osterwalder(2004)
Anthony et al. (2006)Hamel&Prahalad (1990,1994)
Wherecan we go
(paths)
Innovation Paths
Innovation Process Tidd&Bessant (2009)
New Product/Process,New Business Model,New Market Segment,New Skill
-
7/29/2019 Innovation Strategy Visual Mapping Tool-Abstract
16/22
Stage-Gate process (Cooper, 1990), which is mainly aimed at new product
development. Stage gate process is based on the principle that not all ideas
should be pursued and that they should be assessed at each gate to check if theidea should go forward.
Source: Cooper (1990)
Figure 5.5: Stage-Gate process
Lately, a growing interest has been placed by organizations on the earlier phases
of new projects of Innovation. This new phase is called Fuzzy Front End of
Innovation, and it is mainly focus on ideas and concepts in scenarios of high
uncertainty (Koen&Ajamian, 2002; Frishammar&Floren, 2008). The motivation for
this new phase comes from the growing perception that after an idea gets into thenew product development phase, there is not much that can be changed
(Frishammar&Floren, 2008). One of the main tenets behind this concept is that if
an organization is able to manage properly the ideas it will increase its chance of
success.
The Innovation Strategy process, particularly if the goal is renewal of the
organizational competitive advantage which implies aiming for radical innovation,
involves assessing ideas of paths of innovation (new products, new markets, new
-
7/29/2019 Innovation Strategy Visual Mapping Tool-Abstract
17/22
The process proposed for Idea Management aims to help integrate these two
traditional perspectives in a single structured process. To clarify the underlying
strategy principles that would guide such an effort, a brief discussion is providedsince this is not the focus here. The main strategy principles that guide this
integration are Pathbreaking to Create-the-future (Hamel&Prahalad, 1994) and
Path-Creation (Garud&Karne 2010, 2011). These concepts champion that within
bounded-rationality one could act on the organization present to change the
environment and build the future. Considering that the application of these
principles are guided by the theoretical framework of Dynamic Capabilities (Teece
et al. 1997). This implies a practical effort of integration of polarized strategy
perspectives:
Internal [Resources(Teece,1982), Path-dependence(David:1985,Arthur:1996) ], and
External [Markets(Porter:1985), Foresight (Hamel&Prahalad:1994), Environment(Aguilar:1967, Ansoff:1975)
The idea generation would start from 2 directions:
From the present competences and resources to the future
From the Future scenarios to the present position
-
7/29/2019 Innovation Strategy Visual Mapping Tool-Abstract
18/22
These elements were integrated under the structure provided by the Tidd&Bessant
(2009) innovation process framework. The Figure 5.28 shows how the phases of
the innovation process are represented on map. Theses phases structure thediscussion required for the tasks of Sensemaking and Idea Management. They
provide a frame of reference to help evaluate the possible option of paths that an
organization have to build the future and what is big picture in that. The map also
provides a focal point which helps the development of common ground for
discussions. This is mainly done by categorizing and labelling issues, but alsoproviding exploration of theses issues by in different categories.
Overall, the map incentives the creation of a nurturing area for innovation, inside
the organization, with the proper conditions for strategy creation or emergence.
-
7/29/2019 Innovation Strategy Visual Mapping Tool-Abstract
19/22
7 CONCLUSIONS
This study started with a reflection of the importance of innovation for
organizations, and how the seed of this process lies on ideas. The success of this
process will certainly depend of exploration and hard work, as Thomas Edison
approach to innovation showed. Nonetheless, one has to find ways of increasing
the chances of success by generating creative ideas and properly assessing and
selecting the most interesting ones to follow. The tool proposed here aims to
provide some help on this challenging task.
This study was motivated by the realisation of lack of support for strategy creation.
In particular, a process that could provide the right conditions to create the future.
The search started guided by Hamel&Prahalad(1994) vision, and it is worth to end
with some of their reflection:
Hamel&Prahalad (1994,p.XIV) championing the importance of a practical approach
to management theory points out an important aspect:
Professor Drucker has never lost sight of the fact that, for a theory or
concept to be useful, it must ultimately be translated into language and
context of managers and managerial action
This vision has been the fundamental essence that drove this study: to apply
existing concepts and frameworks of innovation and strategy, in a structure that
could improve their usability, and consequently their usefulness.
In search of a Creative and Practical approach for Strategy Creation this study
proceeded. The approach taken here was to identify, in the foundation of the
-
7/29/2019 Innovation Strategy Visual Mapping Tool-Abstract
20/22
perception of the situation they can grasp, and the options available. If this
perception can find a way to be improved by this tool, at least part of the mission
of this study was accomplished.
The process of idea management and sensemaking designed here improves the
chances of making sense of the big picture, and incentives collaboration and
creativity. These elements will increase the options of paths an organization see to
build the future. This process will increase the chances of success, but will notassure results. Because, as any strategy guru would agree, the journey along the
path to the future always involves some learning and adaptation.
The real world inevitably involves some thinking ahead as well as some
adaptation en route.Mintzberg et al. (2008, p. 16)
One just increases its chances of success by thinking ahead.
The name proposed for the tool is Visual Mapping. This choice aims to emphasize
the key role visualization can play on supporting complex activities, like the
innovation strategy process on the path of creating the future. This role can be
even more crucial for organizations in information rich fast-changing environment.
The main theoretical frameworks that provided support for this study are:
A frame of Reference for Sensemaking (Weick:1995, 2012)
Creativity research findings which showed that some support and structure
for explorative thinking can lead to creative ideas (Santanen et al. 2000;
Friedman et al. 2003; Rietzschel et al. 2007; Hilliges et al. 2007).
Visual Strategy framework (Eppler&Platts,2009)
The Innovation process framework (Tidd&Bessant, 2009)
-
7/29/2019 Innovation Strategy Visual Mapping Tool-Abstract
21/22
The main research studies on innovation strategy identified by this study were:
Dodgson et al. (2008), Katz et al. (2010), Bowonder et al. (2010), Hess (2010).
Building on their work, and on the additional analyses and findings of this study,the Table 7.1 is proposed as a reference of the components, paths and important
discussions for the Innovation Strategy process. This table is the progression of
Table 2.4.
Table 7.1: Innovation Strategy: Components, Paths and Important Discussions
Components Paths&Important Discussions
GoalsRenewal, Differentiation, Growth, Profitability,
Lower Risks, Defend, Efficiency, Reaction
Objectives Leadership, Followership, Observe&Adapt,
React
Why to go
Impact Disruptive to Sustaining
Project Risks High to Low Risk
Howimportant is
to go
DriversMarkets, Resources, Technology, Regulation,
Financial, Political
Where to look
Current PositionIndustry, Customers, Suppliers, Resources,
Process, Values, Core competencesWhere we are
TypeProduct, Process, Business Model, New Mkt.
Segment, Competence building (new skill)
Where can
we go
Level Radical to Incremental
Place Internal R&D, Acquisition, Greenfield,
Collaboration Closed vs. Open Innovation, Co-creationImple
menting
Innov. Process Unsystematic, Evolving, Formalized
How to get
there
-
7/29/2019 Innovation Strategy Visual Mapping Tool-Abstract
22/22
91
Figure 7.1: Visual Mapping Tool Final Map Template