1
Introducing…
2
for
3
“To infer as we read is to go
beyond literal interpretation and
to open a world of meaning
deeply connected to our lives.”
~ Ellin Keene
Author of Mosaic of Thought
Elkhart Community Schools 4
Inference
Background
Knowledge
(schema)
Making
Connections
Questioning
Predictions
Imagination/
Visualization
Analysis of Text:
Interpretation/
Judgment
Drawing
Conclusions
5
“Questioning and inferring
work in tandem to enhance
understanding of text.”
~ Harvey & Goudvis
Authors of Strategies That Work
6
Students’ language
provides a clue to
their thinking.
7
Readers are able to think
inferentially when they
connect their background of
information, ideas, and
experiences with the text.
8
It is important for the reader to
have background knowledge
about a text they are reading if
they are expected to read
inferentially.
9
Word Clues
+ Experience
Inference
10
Dorothy Strickland shares, “For struggling
readers, it is critical that we not only activate
their knowledge of topics they must read about
and study, but also be aware of situations in
which they have little or no background
knowledge so that we can build essential
understandings before they begin reading.”
11
Predicting is related
to inferring - - -
BUT
what’s the difference?
12
“When you read, you use all your
senses. You see things in your
‘mind’s eye’ and hear the sounds you
connect to that about which you are
reading.” ~ Guided Reading the Four Blocks Way
13
“Proficient readers use images to
draw conclusions, to create distinct
and unique interpretations of the
text, to recall details significant to the
text, and to recall a text after it has
been read.” ~ Ellin Keene
14
“Inferring is the process of taking
that which is stated in text and
extrapolating it to one’s life to create
a wholly original interpretation that,
in turn, becomes part of one’s beliefs
or knowledge.” ~ Ellin Keene
15
“Proficient readers
make connections
between conclusions
they draw and other
beliefs or knowledge.”
~ Ellin Keene
16
All the processes
work together.
Each works in
concert with
the others to
aid the reader
in comprehending text.
17
18
Step 1 – The teacher explains the strategy (reading between the lines) using short scenarios, riddles, or charades that require students to add up clues and make a conclusion.
Step 2 – The teacher demonstrates how to apply the strategy successfully.
Step 3 – The teacher thinks aloud to model the mental processes he/she uses when he/she reads.
19
• Do several think alouds for this strategy.
• Use picture books for students of all ages.
• Students are only observers at this stage.
• Demonstrate the use of sticky notes to code connections, questions, predictions, conclusions, judgments, etc.
• Allow students to discuss what they observed following the think aloud.
Elkhart Community Schools 20
Use a variety of “lifted text” from different types of books giving everyone a copy or using the document camera.
Use whole group to small group model.
Use short text such as magazine and newspaper articles and poetry.
Encourage students to code their inferences with sticky notes or highlighting.
Use concept maps, two-column notes, and margin writing to record thinking.
Engage students in conversation about their inferences with the text with partners or whole group.
Elkhart Community Schools 21
Guide students’ thinking before reading by using anticipation guides or prediction guides.
Show students how to do a chapter tour or preview of nonfiction text to help them make predictions about the chapter.
Point out connections between inference and the other strategies they’ve learned.
Text sets can be used to have students reflect on inferences and compare them with different books within the set.
Use a book that can create an “anchor” experience for the class.
Elkhart Community Schools 22
The teacher gives the students text that is easy to read on their own.
Students may practice their strategy alone, in pairs, or in small groups such as book clubs or literature circles.
Students can discuss and compare their inferences with other students.
The teacher confers with the students and gives them feedback.
23
Assessing Application of Inference
Keene’s Major Point Interview
Anecdotal Records
Journal Responses
Other Written Responses
Elkhart Community Schools 24
Fiction and Poetry:
Allows a variety of interpretation
Nonfiction/Content Area Text:
Permits a narrow range of interpretation
Best for drawing conclusions, predictions, questioning, and determining importance
25
•Word meanings
•Meanings of text
•Meanings of larger
themes of texts
26
•Predicting Words In Text
(before reading)
•Vocabulary Strategy:
Connect Two
•Cloze Technique
•Guess the Covered Word
Elkhart Community Schools 27
• Anaphoric Inferences: A pronoun or noun-
phrase that refers to a previous text constituent
or to an entity already introduced in the mental
model.
• Bridging Inferences: These are any inferences that a
reader needs to systematically or conceptually relate the
sentence being read with the previous content. These are
sometimes called backward inferences.
Elkhart Community Schools 28
• Explanation Based Inferences: The event being read
about is explained by a causal chain or network of previous
events. These are sometimes called causal antecedent
inferences.
• Goal Inferences: The reader infers that an agent has a
motive that explains an intentional action.
• Elaborative Inferences: These are properties of
entities, facts, and other associations that are not explained
by causal mechanisms.
Elkhart Community Schools 29
• Predictive Inferences: The reader forecasts what
events will causally unfold after the current event that is
being read. These are sometimes called causal consequences or forward references.
• Process Inferences: These inferences specify the
detailed steps, manner, or dynamic characteristics of an
event as it unfolds.
30
Elkhart Community Schools 31
“Art is so much more
interesting if everything
isn’t in the picture.
And so it is with inferring.”
From: I Read It But I Don’t Get It ~ Cris Tovani
32 For more info: http://www.txla.org